Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend BOX Rule 7270 (Block Trades) To Add an Automatic Matching Feature to the Facilitation Auction Mechanism, 31265-31267 [2020-11039]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
these Conditions were approved by the
Required Majority under section 57(f).
12. Director Independence. No
Independent Director (including the
non-interested members of any
Independent Party) of a Regulated Fund
will also be a director, general partner,
managing member or principal, or
otherwise be an ‘‘affiliated person’’ (as
defined in the Act) of any Affiliated
Fund.
13. Expenses. The expenses, if any,
associated with acquiring, holding or
disposing of any securities acquired in
a Co-Investment Transaction (including,
without limitation, the expenses of the
distribution of any such securities
registered for sale under the Securities
Act) will, to the extent not payable by
the Advisers under their respective
advisory agreements with the Regulated
Funds and the Affiliated Funds, be
shared by the Regulated Funds and the
participating Affiliated Funds in
proportion to the relative amounts of the
securities held or being acquired or
disposed of, as the case may be.
14. Transaction Fees.30 Any
transaction fee (including break-up,
structuring, monitoring or commitment
fees but excluding brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted
by section 17(e) or 57(k)) received in
connection with any Co-Investment
Transaction will be distributed to the
participants on a pro rata basis based on
the amounts they invested or
committed, as the case may be, in such
Co-Investment Transaction. If any
transaction fee is to be held by an
Adviser pending consummation of the
transaction, the fee will be deposited
into an account maintained by the
Adviser at a bank or banks having the
qualifications prescribed in section
26(a)(1), and the account will earn a
competitive rate of interest that will also
be divided pro rata among the
participants. None of the Advisers, the
Affiliated Funds, the other Regulated
Funds or any affiliated person of the
Affiliated Funds or the Regulated Funds
will receive any additional
compensation or remuneration of any
kind as a result of or in connection with
a Co-Investment Transaction other than
(i) in the case of the Regulated Funds
and the Affiliated Funds, the pro rata
transaction fees described above and
fees or other compensation described in
Condition 2(c)(iii)(B)(z), (ii) brokerage or
underwriting compensation permitted
by section 17(e) or 57(k) or (iii) in the
case of the Advisers, investment
30 Applicants are not requesting and the
Commission is not providing any relief for
transaction fees received in connection with any
Co-Investment Transaction.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
advisory compensation paid in
accordance with investment advisory
agreements between the applicable
Regulated Fund(s) or Affiliated Fund(s)
and its Adviser.
15. Independence. If the Holders own
in the aggregate more than 25 percent of
the Shares of a Regulated Fund, then the
Holders will vote such Shares as
directed by an independent third party
when voting on (1) the election of
directors; (2) the removal of one or more
directors; or (3) any other matter under
either the Act or applicable State law
affecting the Board’s composition, size
or manner of election.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–11035 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88892; File No. SR–BOX–
2020–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend BOX Rule 7270
(Block Trades) To Add an Automatic
Matching Feature to the Facilitation
Auction Mechanism
May 18, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 7,
2020, BOX Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
BOX Rule 7270 (Block Trades) to add an
automatic matching feature to the
Facilitation Auction mechanism. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
31265
Exchange’s internet website at https://
boxoptions.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Rule 7270 to add an
automatic matching feature to the
Facilitation Auction mechanism.
Currently, BOX’s Facilitation Auction
mechanism allows members to enter
two-sided orders for execution with the
possibility of the Agency Order
receiving price improvement.3 In this
mechanism, an Agency Order is
submitted to BOX by the Facilitating
Participant with a matching guaranteed
contra-side order (‘‘Facilitation Order’’)
equal to the full size of the Agency
Order. The agency side of this two-sided
order is then exposed to market
participants during a one-second
auction to give them an opportunity to
compete so that they may participate in
the execution of the Agency Order.
The Exchange now proposes to adopt
auto-match functionality to the
Facilitation Auction mechanism. Upon
entry of an order into the Facilitation
Mechanism, the Facilitating Participant
can elect to automatically match the
price and size of orders, quotes and
responses received during the exposure
period up to a specified limit price or
without specifying a limit price (‘‘automatch’’). In this case, the Facilitating
Participant will be allocated its full size
at each price point, or at each price
point within its limit price if a limit is
specified, until a price point is reached
where the balance of the order can be
fully executed. At such price point, the
Facilitating Participant shall be
allocated at least forty percent (40%) of
the original size of the facilitation order,
but only after Public Customer interest
3 See BOX Rule 7270(a) (Facilitation Auction
mechanism).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31266
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
at such price point. Thereafter, all other
orders, Responses, and quotes at the
facilitation price will participate in the
execution of the Agency Order based
upon price/time priority. Further, the
Exchange proposes that an election to
automatically match better prices
cannot be cancelled or altered during
the exposure period.
Under the proposal, if a Facilitating
Participant elects to use the auto-match
feature, the Facilitation Order will be
allocated its full size at each price level
where there are competing quotes or
orders, up to the auto-match limit if one
is specified, until a price level is
reached where the balance of the
Agency Order can be fully executed. At
such price level, the Facilitation order
will be allocated the greater of one
contract or 40% of the size of the
Agency Order after Public Customers.
The following examples illustrate how
the proposed auto-match feature will
operate in the Facilitation Auction
mechanism.
Assume the NBBO is $10.60 bid and
$10.70 offered. An Agency Order to sell
50 contracts at $10.65 is entered into the
Facilitation Mechanism by the
Facilitating Participant with a
Facilitation Order that has an automatch limit of $10.70:
• If one Response is received for 20
contracts to buy at $10.70, the Agency
Order will execute against 40 contracts
at $10.70 (20 against the Response and
20 against the Facilitation Order) and 10
contracts at $10.65 (against the
Facilitation Order).
In the same scenario above, with
multiple Responses, the Facilitating
Participant will be allocated its full size
at each price point, or at each price
point within its limit price if a limit is
specified, until a price point is reached
where the balance of the order can be
fully executed. At such price point, the
facilitating Participant shall be allocated
at least forty percent (40%) of the
original size of the facilitation order, but
only after Public Customer interest at
such price point.4
• If Response 1 is for 20 contracts to
buy at $10.70 and Response 2 and
Response 3 are for 5 contracts (each
respectively) to buy at $10.65 (Response
2 is a Broker Dealer and Response 3 is
a Market Maker), the Agency Order will
execute against 40 contracts at $10.70
(20 against Response 1 and 20 contracts
against the Facilitation Order) and 10
contracts at $10.65 against the
Facilitation Order.
• If Response 1 is for 20 contracts to
buy at $10.70 and Response 2 and
Response 3 are for 5 contracts (each
4 See
Proposed Rule 7270(a)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
respectively) to buy at $10.65 (Response
2 is a Public Customer and Response 3
is a Broker Dealer), the Agency Order
will execute against: 40 Contracts at
$10.70 (20 contracts against Response 1
and 20 contracts against the Facilitation
Order), 5 contracts at $10.65 against
Response 2 (Public Customer Response),
and then the remaining 5 contracts at
$10.65 against the Facilitation Order.
Under the current rules, the Agency
Order in the examples would sell 20
contracts at $10.70 and the remaining
contracts at $10.65. Thus, the proposed
auto-match feature will benefit the
Agency Order because it sells an
additional 20 contracts at the better
price.
The Exchange notes that the
Facilitation Auction mechanism allows
for broad participation in its
competitive auctions by all types of
market participants (e.g., Public
Customers, Broker-Dealers, and Market
Makers). All market participants are
able to receive the auction broadcast
and may respond by submitting
competing interest (i.e., responses,
orders and quotes). All Agency Orders
entered into the mechanisms will
continue to be broadly exposed in the
auction before the Facilitating
Participant can execute against the
Agency Order via the auto-match
feature.
The Exchange notes that when the
Facilitating Participant selects the automatch feature prior to the start of an
auction, the available liquidity at
improved prices is increased and
competitive final pricing is out of the
Facilitating Participant’s control. The
Exchange believes that the proposal will
increase competition in the auctions,
will provide more options contracts
with price improvement and incent
market participants to initiate more
auctions with the auto-match feature.
Increases in the number of auctions
initiated on the Exchange using the
Facilitation Auction mechanism will
directly correlate with an increase in the
number of Agency Orders that are
provided with the opportunity to
receive price improvement over the
NBBO.
The Exchange also notes that this
auto-match feature has been
implemented by another options
exchange with respect to their
facilitation auction mechanism.5
5 See Nasdaq ISE (‘‘ISE’’) Rule Options 3, Section
11(b)(C). The Exchange notes a minor difference
between the proposed rule discussed herein and
ISE’s rule. ISE’s rule states that ‘‘. . . thereafter, all
other orders, Responses, and quotes at the price
point will participate in the execution of the
facilitation order based upon the percentage of the
total number of contracts available at the facilitation
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,6
in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,7 in particular, that an exchange
have rules that are designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism for a free and
open market and a national market
system, and in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Exchange believes that
the proposal will result in additional
liquidity available at improved prices
with competitive final pricing out of the
Facilitating Participant’s control, thus
increasing competition in the
Facilitation auctions and providing
more options contracts with price
improvement. As a result of the
increased opportunity for price
improvement, the Exchange believes
that market participants will be
incented to initiate more Facilitation
auctions. Increases in the number of
auctions will directly correlate with an
increase in the number of customer
orders that are provided with the
opportunity to receive price
improvement over the NBBO. Further,
the Exchange notes that similar
functionality currently exists at another
options exchange in the industry.8
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
This proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The proposed functionality, which is
similar to functionality offered on
another exchange, is voluntary and the
Exchange therefore does not believe that
providing this functionality will have
any significant impact on competition.
Further, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change is evidence of the
competitive environment in the options
industry where exchanges must
continually improve their offerings to
maintain competitive standing. As such,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
price that is represented by the size of the order,
Response or quote.’’ The Exchange notes that ISE
is a pro-rata allocation exchange which is reflected
by the rule text discussed above. Further, BOX is
a price/time priority exchange. As such, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to reflect the use
of price/time priority, not pro-rata, in the proposed
change.
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
8 See supra note 5.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 9 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.10
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not
become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing. However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 11 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Commission notes that waiver of the
operative delay would allow the
Exchange to provide the auto-match
functionality immediately available to
Participants. The Commission also notes
that the proposed rule change is
substantially similar to functionality on
another options exchange.12 For these
reasons, the Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission waives
the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
12 See supra note 5.
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
10 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BOX–2020–12 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2020–12. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31267
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2020–12, and should
be submitted on or before June 12, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–11039 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88894; File No. SR–BOX–
2020–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend IM–3120–2 to
BOX Rule 3120 (‘‘Position Limits’’) To
Increase Position Limits for Options on
Certain Exchange-Traded Funds
(‘‘ETFs’’), and Thereby Similarly
Increase Exercise Limits Under IM–
3140–1 for Certain ETFs
May 18, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 7,
2020, BOX Exchange LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend IM–
3120–2 to BOX Rule 3120 (‘‘Position
Limits’’) to increase position limits for
options on certain exchange-traded
funds (‘‘ETFs’’), and thereby similarly
increase exercise limits under IM–3140–
1 for certain ETFs. The text of the
proposed rule change is available from
the principal office of the Exchange, at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room and also on the Exchange’s
internet website at https://
boxoptions.com.
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 100 (Friday, May 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31265-31267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11039]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88892; File No. SR-BOX-2020-12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend BOX Rule
7270 (Block Trades) To Add an Automatic Matching Feature to the
Facilitation Auction Mechanism
May 18, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 7, 2020, BOX Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 7270 (Block Trades) to add
an automatic matching feature to the Facilitation Auction mechanism.
The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal
office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and
also on the Exchange's internet website at https://boxoptions.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 7270 to
add an automatic matching feature to the Facilitation Auction
mechanism.
Currently, BOX's Facilitation Auction mechanism allows members to
enter two-sided orders for execution with the possibility of the Agency
Order receiving price improvement.\3\ In this mechanism, an Agency
Order is submitted to BOX by the Facilitating Participant with a
matching guaranteed contra-side order (``Facilitation Order'') equal to
the full size of the Agency Order. The agency side of this two-sided
order is then exposed to market participants during a one-second
auction to give them an opportunity to compete so that they may
participate in the execution of the Agency Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See BOX Rule 7270(a) (Facilitation Auction mechanism).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to adopt auto-match functionality to the
Facilitation Auction mechanism. Upon entry of an order into the
Facilitation Mechanism, the Facilitating Participant can elect to
automatically match the price and size of orders, quotes and responses
received during the exposure period up to a specified limit price or
without specifying a limit price (``auto-match''). In this case, the
Facilitating Participant will be allocated its full size at each price
point, or at each price point within its limit price if a limit is
specified, until a price point is reached where the balance of the
order can be fully executed. At such price point, the Facilitating
Participant shall be allocated at least forty percent (40%) of the
original size of the facilitation order, but only after Public Customer
interest
[[Page 31266]]
at such price point. Thereafter, all other orders, Responses, and
quotes at the facilitation price will participate in the execution of
the Agency Order based upon price/time priority. Further, the Exchange
proposes that an election to automatically match better prices cannot
be cancelled or altered during the exposure period.
Under the proposal, if a Facilitating Participant elects to use the
auto-match feature, the Facilitation Order will be allocated its full
size at each price level where there are competing quotes or orders, up
to the auto-match limit if one is specified, until a price level is
reached where the balance of the Agency Order can be fully executed. At
such price level, the Facilitation order will be allocated the greater
of one contract or 40% of the size of the Agency Order after Public
Customers. The following examples illustrate how the proposed auto-
match feature will operate in the Facilitation Auction mechanism.
Assume the NBBO is $10.60 bid and $10.70 offered. An Agency Order
to sell 50 contracts at $10.65 is entered into the Facilitation
Mechanism by the Facilitating Participant with a Facilitation Order
that has an auto-match limit of $10.70:
If one Response is received for 20 contracts to buy at
$10.70, the Agency Order will execute against 40 contracts at $10.70
(20 against the Response and 20 against the Facilitation Order) and 10
contracts at $10.65 (against the Facilitation Order).
In the same scenario above, with multiple Responses, the
Facilitating Participant will be allocated its full size at each price
point, or at each price point within its limit price if a limit is
specified, until a price point is reached where the balance of the
order can be fully executed. At such price point, the facilitating
Participant shall be allocated at least forty percent (40%) of the
original size of the facilitation order, but only after Public Customer
interest at such price point.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Proposed Rule 7270(a)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Response 1 is for 20 contracts to buy at $10.70 and
Response 2 and Response 3 are for 5 contracts (each respectively) to
buy at $10.65 (Response 2 is a Broker Dealer and Response 3 is a Market
Maker), the Agency Order will execute against 40 contracts at $10.70
(20 against Response 1 and 20 contracts against the Facilitation Order)
and 10 contracts at $10.65 against the Facilitation Order.
If Response 1 is for 20 contracts to buy at $10.70 and
Response 2 and Response 3 are for 5 contracts (each respectively) to
buy at $10.65 (Response 2 is a Public Customer and Response 3 is a
Broker Dealer), the Agency Order will execute against: 40 Contracts at
$10.70 (20 contracts against Response 1 and 20 contracts against the
Facilitation Order), 5 contracts at $10.65 against Response 2 (Public
Customer Response), and then the remaining 5 contracts at $10.65
against the Facilitation Order.
Under the current rules, the Agency Order in the examples would
sell 20 contracts at $10.70 and the remaining contracts at $10.65.
Thus, the proposed auto-match feature will benefit the Agency Order
because it sells an additional 20 contracts at the better price.
The Exchange notes that the Facilitation Auction mechanism allows
for broad participation in its competitive auctions by all types of
market participants (e.g., Public Customers, Broker-Dealers, and Market
Makers). All market participants are able to receive the auction
broadcast and may respond by submitting competing interest (i.e.,
responses, orders and quotes). All Agency Orders entered into the
mechanisms will continue to be broadly exposed in the auction before
the Facilitating Participant can execute against the Agency Order via
the auto-match feature.
The Exchange notes that when the Facilitating Participant selects
the auto-match feature prior to the start of an auction, the available
liquidity at improved prices is increased and competitive final pricing
is out of the Facilitating Participant's control. The Exchange believes
that the proposal will increase competition in the auctions, will
provide more options contracts with price improvement and incent market
participants to initiate more auctions with the auto-match feature.
Increases in the number of auctions initiated on the Exchange using the
Facilitation Auction mechanism will directly correlate with an increase
in the number of Agency Orders that are provided with the opportunity
to receive price improvement over the NBBO.
The Exchange also notes that this auto-match feature has been
implemented by another options exchange with respect to their
facilitation auction mechanism.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Nasdaq ISE (``ISE'') Rule Options 3, Section 11(b)(C).
The Exchange notes a minor difference between the proposed rule
discussed herein and ISE's rule. ISE's rule states that ``. . .
thereafter, all other orders, Responses, and quotes at the price
point will participate in the execution of the facilitation order
based upon the percentage of the total number of contracts available
at the facilitation price that is represented by the size of the
order, Response or quote.'' The Exchange notes that ISE is a pro-
rata allocation exchange which is reflected by the rule text
discussed above. Further, BOX is a price/time priority exchange. As
such, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to reflect the use of
price/time priority, not pro-rata, in the proposed change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, that an exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes
that the proposal will result in additional liquidity available at
improved prices with competitive final pricing out of the Facilitating
Participant's control, thus increasing competition in the Facilitation
auctions and providing more options contracts with price improvement.
As a result of the increased opportunity for price improvement, the
Exchange believes that market participants will be incented to initiate
more Facilitation auctions. Increases in the number of auctions will
directly correlate with an increase in the number of customer orders
that are provided with the opportunity to receive price improvement
over the NBBO. Further, the Exchange notes that similar functionality
currently exists at another options exchange in the industry.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
This proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The proposed functionality, which is similar to functionality
offered on another exchange, is voluntary and the Exchange therefore
does not believe that providing this functionality will have any
significant impact on competition. Further, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change is evidence of the competitive environment in the
options industry where exchanges must continually improve their
offerings to maintain competitive standing. As such, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition not necessary or
[[Page 31267]]
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing. However, Rule
19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \11\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the
30-day operative delay. The Commission notes that waiver of the
operative delay would allow the Exchange to provide the auto-match
functionality immediately available to Participants. The Commission
also notes that the proposed rule change is substantially similar to
functionality on another options exchange.\12\ For these reasons, the
Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\12\ See supra note 5.
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2020-12 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2020-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2020-12, and should be submitted on
or before June 12, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-11039 Filed 5-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P