Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Renewal of Generic Clearance; Comment Request, 27761 [2020-09986]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 91 / Monday, May 11, 2020 / Notices
Commission, its employees and Offices,
and contract personnel (a) for
developing or maintaining the records
of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in
internal investigations, audits, reviews,
and evaluations relating to the
programs, personnel, and operations of
the Commission including under 5
U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S.
government employees and contract
personnel,1 solely for cybersecurity
purposes. All nonconfidential written
submissions will be available for public
inspection at the Office of the Secretary
and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and in Part 210 of the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 6, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–10017 Filed 5–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Renewal of Generic
Clearance; Comment Request
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice and comment request.
AGENCY:
Consistent with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. International Trade Commission
(Commission) has submitted a proposal
for the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for approval. The proposed
information collection is a three-year
extension of the current generic
clearance (approved by OMB under
Control No. 3117–0016) under which
the Commission can issue information
collections for import injury
investigations and reviews that it is
required to conduct under the Tariff Act
of 1930, the Trade Act of 1974, and
other trade remedy statutes that require
or authorize the Commission to make
findings or determinations. These
investigations and reviews include:
Antidumping duty, countervailing duty,
global safeguard, United States-MexicoCanada Agreement safeguard, market
disruption, interference with programs
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
1 All contract personnel will sign appropriate
nondisclosure agreements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 May 08, 2020
Jkt 250001
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
and bilateral safeguard. Any comments
submitted to OMB on the proposed
information collection should be
specific, indicating which part of the
questionnaires or study plan are
objectionable, describing the issue in
detail, and including specific revisions
or language changes.
The Commission did not receive any
comments in response to the 60-day
notice that it published in the Federal
Register on January 29, 2020.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before June 10, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged
to submit comments by email. Submit
any comments about the proposal to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Sam Wice, Desk
Officer for U.S. International Trade
Commission at Samuel.L.Wice@
omb.eop.gov. Provide copies of any
comments that you submit to OMB to
Jeremy Wise, Director, Office of
Analysis and Research Services, U.S.
International Trade Commission at
Jeremy.Wise@usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You
may obtain copies of the proposed
collection of information and
supporting documentation from
Nathanael Comly, Supervisory
Investigator, U.S. International Trade
Commission at Nathanael.Comly@
usitc.gov or 202–205–3174. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal at 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. You
may obtain general information about
the Commission at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(1) The proposed information
collection consists of six forms, namely
the Sample Producers’, Sample
Importers’, Sample Purchasers’, and
Sample Foreign Producers’
questionnaires (separate forms are
provided for questionnaires issued for
the five-year reviews), Sample
Administrative Protective Order
Application Form, and Sample Notice of
Institution for Five-Year Reviews.
(2) The types of items contained
within the sample questionnaires,
administrative protective order
application, and institution notice are
largely determined by statute. Actual
questions formulated for use in a
specific investigation depend upon such
factors as the nature of the industry, the
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27761
relevant issues, the ability of
respondents to supply the data, and the
availability of data from secondary
sources.
(3) Commission staff consolidates the
information collected through
questionnaires issued under the generic
clearance for trade remedy
investigations, and this information
forms much of the statistical base for the
Commission’s determinations.
Affirmative Commission determinations
in antidumping and countervailing duty
investigations result in the imposition of
duties on imports entering the United
States, as determined by the U.S.
Department of Commerce, which are in
addition to any normal customs duties.
If the Commission makes an affirmative
determination in a five-year review, the
existing antidumping or countervailing
duty order remains in place. The
president or the U.S. Trade
Representative use the data developed
in global safeguard, market disruption,
and interference with U.S. Department
of Agriculture program investigations (if
the Commission finds affirmatively) to
determine the type of relief, if any, to be
provided to domestic industries.
The submissions made to the
Commission of the administrative
protective order application form is the
basis on which parties are granted
disclosure of business proprietary
information. The submissions made to
the Commission in response to the
notices of institution of five-year
reviews are the basis for the
Commission’s determination whether to
conduct a full or expedited review.
(4) Likely respondents are businesses
(including foreign businesses) or farms
that produce, import, or purchase
products under investigation. The
Commission estimates that information
collections issued under the requested
generic clearance will impose an
average annual burden of 409,250 hours
on 12,935 respondents (i.e., recipients
that provide a response to the
Commission’s questionnaires, notices of
institution of five-year reviews, and
other investigations and forms).
(5) No record keeping burden is
known to result from the proposed
collection of information.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 5, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–09986 Filed 5–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 91 (Monday, May 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 27761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09986]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Renewal of Generic Clearance; Comment Request
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice and comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Consistent with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the U.S.
International Trade Commission (Commission) has submitted a proposal
for the collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for approval. The proposed information collection is a
three-year extension of the current generic clearance (approved by OMB
under Control No. 3117-0016) under which the Commission can issue
information collections for import injury investigations and reviews
that it is required to conduct under the Tariff Act of 1930, the Trade
Act of 1974, and other trade remedy statutes that require or authorize
the Commission to make findings or determinations. These investigations
and reviews include: Antidumping duty, countervailing duty, global
safeguard, United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement safeguard, market
disruption, interference with programs of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, and bilateral safeguard. Any comments submitted to OMB on
the proposed information collection should be specific, indicating
which part of the questionnaires or study plan are objectionable,
describing the issue in detail, and including specific revisions or
language changes.
The Commission did not receive any comments in response to the 60-
day notice that it published in the Federal Register on January 29,
2020.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 10, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Commenters are encouraged to submit comments by email.
Submit any comments about the proposal to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Sam
Wice, Desk Officer for U.S. International Trade Commission at
[email protected]. Provide copies of any comments that you
submit to OMB to Jeremy Wise, Director, Office of Analysis and Research
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission at [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You may obtain copies of the proposed
collection of information and supporting documentation from Nathanael
Comly, Supervisory Investigator, U.S. International Trade Commission at
[email protected] or 202-205-3174. Hearing-impaired persons can
obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal at 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should
contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. You may obtain
general information about the Commission at https://www.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(1) The proposed information collection consists of six forms,
namely the Sample Producers', Sample Importers', Sample Purchasers',
and Sample Foreign Producers' questionnaires (separate forms are
provided for questionnaires issued for the five-year reviews), Sample
Administrative Protective Order Application Form, and Sample Notice of
Institution for Five-Year Reviews.
(2) The types of items contained within the sample questionnaires,
administrative protective order application, and institution notice are
largely determined by statute. Actual questions formulated for use in a
specific investigation depend upon such factors as the nature of the
industry, the relevant issues, the ability of respondents to supply the
data, and the availability of data from secondary sources.
(3) Commission staff consolidates the information collected through
questionnaires issued under the generic clearance for trade remedy
investigations, and this information forms much of the statistical base
for the Commission's determinations. Affirmative Commission
determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations
result in the imposition of duties on imports entering the United
States, as determined by the U.S. Department of Commerce, which are in
addition to any normal customs duties. If the Commission makes an
affirmative determination in a five-year review, the existing
antidumping or countervailing duty order remains in place. The
president or the U.S. Trade Representative use the data developed in
global safeguard, market disruption, and interference with U.S.
Department of Agriculture program investigations (if the Commission
finds affirmatively) to determine the type of relief, if any, to be
provided to domestic industries.
The submissions made to the Commission of the administrative
protective order application form is the basis on which parties are
granted disclosure of business proprietary information. The submissions
made to the Commission in response to the notices of institution of
five-year reviews are the basis for the Commission's determination
whether to conduct a full or expedited review.
(4) Likely respondents are businesses (including foreign
businesses) or farms that produce, import, or purchase products under
investigation. The Commission estimates that information collections
issued under the requested generic clearance will impose an average
annual burden of 409,250 hours on 12,935 respondents (i.e., recipients
that provide a response to the Commission's questionnaires, notices of
institution of five-year reviews, and other investigations and forms).
(5) No record keeping burden is known to result from the proposed
collection of information.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: May 5, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-09986 Filed 5-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P