Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 26929-26930 [2020-09669]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Notices
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–09670 Filed 5–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–011]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited
sunset review, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on Certain Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Products (certain solar
products) from the People’s Republic of
China (China) would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies as indicated
in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable May 6, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathryn Turlo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 18, 2015, Commerce
published its CVD order on certain solar
products from China in the Federal
Register.1 On January 2, 2020,
Commerce initiated the first sunset
review of the countervailing duty order
covering certain solar products from
China, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 Commerce received notices of
intent to participate in this sunset
review from SunPower Manufacturing
Oregon, LLC (SunPower) and Hanwha Q
CELLS USA, Inc. (Q Cells) (collectively,
the domestic interested parties), within
the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR
1 See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 8592 (February
18, 2015) (Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85
FR 67 (January 2, 2020) (Notice of Initiation).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic
interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of
the Act, as producers of certain solar
products.
Commerce received adequate
substantive responses to the Notice of
Initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4
On February 25, 2020, Commerce
notified the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) that it did not receive
a substantive response from respondent
interested parties.5 In accordance with
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the Order on certain
solar products from China.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order is
certain solar products, which are
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item numbers
8501.61.0000, 8507.20.8030,
8507.20.8040, 8507.20.8060,
8507.20.8090, 8541.40.6020,
8541.40.6030 and 8501.31.8000. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.6
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, including the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies and the net
countervailable subsidy likely to prevail
if the Order were revoked. Parties can
find a complete discussion of all issues
raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
3 See SunPower’s Letter, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Products from China and Taiwan:
Intent to Participate in Sunset Reviews,’’ dated
January 13, 2020; see also Q Cells’ Letter,
‘‘Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
People Republic of China and Taiwan: Hanwha Q
CELLS USA, Inc.’s Notice of Intent to Participate in
Sunset Reviews,’’ dated January 17, 2020.
4 See SunPower’s Letter, ‘‘Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Products from China and Taiwan
Sunset Reviews: Substantive Response of SPMOR,’’
dated February 3, 2020; see also Q Cells’ Letter,
‘‘Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products
from China and Taiwan, Inv. Nos. 701–TA–511 and
731–TA–1246 and 1247 (1st Sunset Review);
Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc.’s Substantive,’’ dated
February 3, 2020.
5 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Review
Initiated on January 2, 2020,’’ dated February 25,
2020.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the First
Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Orders on Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from the People’s Republic of China,’’
dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26929
public memorandum, which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Services System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
A list of the issues discussed in the
decision memorandum is attached at the
Appendix to this notice. The signed and
electronic versions of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(b) of the Act, Commerce determines
that revocation of the countervailing
duty Order on certain solar products
from China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies at the
following rates: 27.65 percent for Wuxi
Suntech Power Co., Ltd. (Wuxi
Suntech); 33.50 percent for Changzhou
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Trina
Solar); and 33.58 percent for all others.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
the final results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218.
Dated: May 1, 2020.
Joseph A. Laroski Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
26930
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 6, 2020 / Notices
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–09669 Filed 5–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–881; C–533–882]
Large Diameter Welded Pipe From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty and Countervailing Duty Changed
Circumstances Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 18, 2019, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published a notice of initiation and
expedited preliminary results of the
changed circumstances reviews (CCR) of
the antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD) orders on
large diameter welded pipe from India
which revoked, in part, these orders as
they relate to certain specific large
diameter welded pipe products.
Commerce has adopted the scope
exclusion language in these final results.
DATES: Applicable May 6, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Johnson or Jaron Moore, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4929 or
(202) 482–3640, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On March 6, 2019, Commerce
published the AD and CVD orders on
large diameter welded pipe from India.1
On December 18, 2019, in response to
a request submitted by members of the
domestic industry, including the
petitioners from the underlying
investigations,2 Commerce published
the Initiation and Preliminary Results,3
1 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India:
Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 8079 (March 6,
2019) and Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India:
Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 8085 (March 6,
2019) (Orders).
2 The companies composing the ‘‘domestic
industry’’ are: American Cast Iron Pipe Company;
Berg Steel Pipe Corp./Berg Spiral Pipe Corp.; DuraBond Industries; Stupp Corporation; (individually
and as members of the American Line Pipe
Producers Association); Greens Bayou Pipe Mill,
LP; JSW Steel (USA) Inc.; Skyline Steel; and Trinity
Products LLC (collectively the petitioners in the
less-than-fair-value investigation) and Welspun
Global Trade LLC.
3 See Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India:
Initiation and Expedited Preliminary Results of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 May 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
in which Commerce preliminarily
revoked, in part, the Orders with respect
to certain large diameter welded pipe
products with specific combinations of
grades, diameters and wall thicknesses.
These products have been incorporated
into the exclusion language of the scope,
below in bold.
The petitioners, representing
‘‘substantially all’’ of the domestic
industry,4 demonstrated ‘‘good cause’’
to conduct the CCRs less than 24
months after the date of publication of
notices of the final determinations in
the investigations.5 Specifically, the
domestic industry does not currently
produce the particular large diameter
welded pipe products subject to this
partial revocation request, and the
investment needed to do so far exceeds
the potential benefit of such investment.
In addition, the domestic producers
provided an explanation indicating that
the commercial reality has changed
since the Orders were put in place.
In the Initiation and Preliminary
Results, we provided all interested
parties an opportunity to comment and
to request a public hearing regarding our
preliminary findings.6 On January 2,
2020, SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH)
commented on the Initiation and
Preliminary Results.7 The domestic
industry submitted rebuttal comments
on January 9, 2020.8
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these
Orders is welded carbon and alloy steel
line pipe (other than stainless steel
pipe), more than 406.4 mm (16 inches)
in nominal outside diameter (large
diameter welded line pipe), regardless
of wall thickness, length, surface finish,
grade, end finish, or stenciling. Large
diameter welded pipe may be used to
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Changed Circumstances Reviews, 84 FR 69356
(December 18, 2019) (Initiation and Preliminary
Results).
4 Id., 84 FR at 65357. Commerce has interpreted
‘‘substantially all’’ to mean at least 85 percent of the
total production of the domestic like product
covered by the order. See, e.g., Supercalendered
Paper From Canada: Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review and Revocation of
Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 32268 (July 12,
2018).
5 See 19 CFR 351.216(c).
6 See Initiation and Preliminary Results, 84 FR at
65357.
7 See SeAH’s Letter, ‘‘Changed Circumstances
Review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Large Diameter Welded Pipe from
India—Comments on Preliminary Results of
Review,’’ dated January 2, 2020 (SeAH Comments).
8 See the Domestic Industry’s Letter, ‘‘Large
Diameter Welded Pipe from India: Response to
SeAH’s Comments on Preliminary Results of
Review,’’ dated January 9, 2020 (Petitioners’
Rebuttal Comments).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
transport oil, gas, slurry, steam, or other
fluids, liquids, or gases.
Large diameter welded line pipe is
used to transport oil, gas, or natural gas
liquids and is normally produced to the
American Petroleum Institute (API)
specification 5L. Large diameter welded
line pipe can be produced to
comparable foreign specifications,
grades and/or standards or to
proprietary specifications, grades and/or
standards, or can be non-graded
material. All line pipe meeting the
physical description set forth above,
including any dual- or multiplecertified/stenciled pipe with an API (or
comparable) welded line pipe
certification/stencil, is covered by the
scope of the Orders.
Subject merchandise also includes
large diameter welded line pipe that has
been further processed in a third
country, including but not limited to
coating, painting, notching, beveling,
cutting, punching, welding, or any other
processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope
of the Orders if performed in the
country of manufacture of the in-scope
large diameter welded line pipe.
Excluded from the scope of the Orders
is structural pipe, which is produced
only to American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) standards A500,
A252, or A53, or other relevant
domestic specifications, or comparable
foreign specifications, grades and/or
standards or to proprietary
specifications, grades and/or standards.
Also excluded is large diameter welded
pipe produced only to specifications of
the American Water Works Association
(AWWA) for water and sewage pipe.
Also excluded is large diameter welded
pipe in the following combinations of
grades, outside diameters, and wall
thicknesses:
• Grade X60, X65, or X70, 18 inches
outside diameter, 0.688 inches or greater
wall thickness;
• Grade X60, X65, or X70, 20 inches
outside diameter, 0.688 inches or greater
wall thickness;
• Grade X60, X65, X70, or X80, 22
inches outside diameter, 0.750 inches or
greater wall thickness; and
• Grade X60, X65, or X70, 24 inches
outside diameter, 0.750 inches or greater
wall thickness.
The large diameter welded line pipe
that is subject to these Orders is
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under subheadings
7305.11.1030, 7305.11.1060,
7305.11.5000, 7305.12.1030,
7305.12.1060, 7305.12.5000,
7305.19.1030, 7305.19.1060, and
7305.19.5000. Merchandise currently
E:\FR\FM\06MYN1.SGM
06MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26929-26930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-011]
Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products From the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited sunset review, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the countervailing duty
order on Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products (certain
solar products) from the People's Republic of China (China) would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of countervailable
subsidies as indicated in the ``Final Results of Sunset Review''
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable May 6, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Turlo, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3870.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 18, 2015, Commerce published its CVD order on certain
solar products from China in the Federal Register.\1\ On January 2,
2020, Commerce initiated the first sunset review of the countervailing
duty order covering certain solar products from China, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
Commerce received notices of intent to participate in this sunset
review from SunPower Manufacturing Oregon, LLC (SunPower) and Hanwha Q
CELLS USA, Inc. (Q Cells) (collectively, the domestic interested
parties), within the 15-day period specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ The domestic interested parties claimed interested
party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as producers of
certain solar products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 8592 (February 18, 2015) (Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 85 FR 67
(January 2, 2020) (Notice of Initiation).
\3\ See SunPower's Letter, ``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from China and Taiwan: Intent to Participate in Sunset
Reviews,'' dated January 13, 2020; see also Q Cells' Letter,
``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from People Republic of
China and Taiwan: Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc.'s Notice of Intent to
Participate in Sunset Reviews,'' dated January 17, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce received adequate substantive responses to the Notice of
Initiation from the domestic interested parties within the 30-day
period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\4\ On February 25, 2020,
Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it
did not receive a substantive response from respondent interested
parties.\5\ In accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the Order on certain solar products from China.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See SunPower's Letter, ``Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from China and Taiwan Sunset Reviews: Substantive Response
of SPMOR,'' dated February 3, 2020; see also Q Cells' Letter,
``Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from China and
Taiwan, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-511 and 731-TA-1246 and 1247 (1st Sunset
Review); Hanwha Q CELLS USA, Inc.'s Substantive,'' dated February 3,
2020.
\5\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Review Initiated on January
2, 2020,'' dated February 25, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the Order is certain solar products, which
are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item numbers 8501.61.0000, 8507.20.8030,
8507.20.8040, 8507.20.8060, 8507.20.8090, 8541.40.6020, 8541.40.6030
and 8501.31.8000. A full description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the First Expedited Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic
Products from the People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently
with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of countervailable subsidies and the net countervailable
subsidy likely to prevail if the Order were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Services System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A
list of the issues discussed in the decision memorandum is attached at
the Appendix to this notice. The signed and electronic versions of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(b) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the countervailing duty Order on certain
solar products from China would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of countervailable subsidies at the following rates: 27.65
percent for Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd. (Wuxi Suntech); 33.50 percent
for Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. (Trina Solar); and 33.58
percent for all others.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of
the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective
order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing the final results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: May 1, 2020.
Joseph A. Laroski Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. History of the Order
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
[[Page 26930]]
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020-09669 Filed 5-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P