Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15) To Shorten the Holding Period Requirements for Midpoint Extended Life Orders and Midpoint Extended Life Orders Plus Continuous Book, 24068-24069 [2020-09123]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24068
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 84 / Thursday, April 30, 2020 / Notices
Applicant’s Address: Lucia.Williams@
aig.com.
This order approves the proposed rule
change.
Variable Annuity Account Two [File
No. 811–08626]
II. Description of the Proposal
M–ELO is an order type with a nondisplay order attribute that is priced at
the midpoint between the national best
bid and national best offer (‘‘NBBO’’)
and that will not be eligible to execute
until a holding period of one-half
second (‘‘Holding Period’’) has passed
after acceptance of the order by the
system.4 Once a M–ELO becomes
eligible to execute, the order may only
execute against other eligible M–ELOs
and M–ELO+CBs.5
M–ELO+CB is an order type that has
all of the characteristics and attributes
of a M–ELO, except that after satisfying
its Holding Period, in addition to
executing against other eligible M–
ELO+CBs and M–ELOs, it may also
execute against certain orders on the
Exchange’s continuous book.6
Specifically, a M–ELO+CB may execute
against non-displayed orders with
midpoint pegging and midpoint peg
post-only orders (collectively,
‘‘Midpoint Orders’’) resting on the
Exchange’s continuous book, if: (1) The
Midpoint Order has the midpoint trade
now order attribute enabled; (2) the
Midpoint Order has rested on the
continuous book for at least one-half
second (‘‘Resting Period’’) after the
NBBO midpoint falls within the limit
price set by the participant; (3) no other
order is resting on the continuous book
that has a more aggressive price than the
current NBBO midpoint; and (4) the
Midpoint Order satisfies any minimum
quantity requirement of the M–
ELO+CB.7
The Exchange now proposes to
shorten the Holding Period for M–ELOs
and M–ELO+CBs from one-half second
to ten milliseconds.8 The Exchange also
proposes to shorten the corresponding
Resting Period for Midpoint Orders from
one-half second to ten milliseconds.9
According to the Exchange, after
observing M–ELO and M–ELO+CB
trading over the past two years and
gathering feedback from market
participants (in particular, those that
trade with a longer time horizon and are
concerned with market impact), it has
determined that the length of the
Holding Period should be recalibrated.10
Summary: Applicant, a unit
investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. The applicant has
transferred its assets to Variable
Separate Account. Expenses of less than
$10,000 incurred in connection with the
reorganization were paid by American
General Life Insurance Company.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on December 19, 2019.
Applicant’s Address: Lucia.Williams@
aig.com.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–09142 Filed 4–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88743; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2020–011]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15)
To Shorten the Holding Period
Requirements for Midpoint Extended
Life Orders and Midpoint Extended Life
Orders Plus Continuous Book
April 24, 2020.
I. Introduction
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
On February 26, 2020, The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or
‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to amend Nasdaq
Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15) to shorten
the holding period requirements for
Midpoint Extended Life Orders (‘‘M–
ELOs’’) and Midpoint Extended Life
Orders Plus Continuous Book (‘‘M–
ELO+CBs’’). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on March 10, 2020.3
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88320
(March 4, 2020), 85 FR 13962 (‘‘Notice’’). Comments
on the proposed rule change can be found at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2020011/srnasdaq2020011.htm.
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Apr 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
4 See
Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(14).
id.
6 See Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(15).
7 See id.
8 See proposed Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(14).
9 See proposed Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(15).
10 See Notice, supra note 3, at 13963. The
Exchange also states that participants have
informed the Exchange that in certain
circumstances, such as when they seek to trade
5 See
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange states that reducing the
Holding Period to ten milliseconds
would not compromise the purpose of
the M–ELO and M–ELO+CB order
types.11 In particular, the Exchange
states that it examined historical M–
ELO executions and found that reducing
the Holding Period to ten milliseconds
would not have a material impact on its
protective effect.12
The Exchange states that it will
continue to conduct real-time
surveillance to monitor the use of M–
ELOs and M–ELO+CBs to ensure that
such usage remains appropriately tied to
the intent of the order types.13 If, as a
result of such surveillance, the
Exchange determines that the shortened
Holding Period does not serve its
intended purpose or adversely impacts
market quality, the Exchange would
seek to make further recalibrations.14
The Exchange intends to make the
proposed changes effective in the
second quarter of 2020 and will publish
a trader alert at least 14 days in advance
of making the proposed changes
effective.15
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.16 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,17 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
symbols that on average have a lower time-toexecution than one-half second, they are reticent to
enter M–ELOs and M–ELO+CBs because the
Holding Period is too long and presents
countervailing risks (i.e., the Holding Period is
longer than necessary and participants risk losing
out on favorable execution opportunities that would
otherwise be available to them had they placed a
non-M–ELO or M–ELO+CB order). See id. In
addition, the Exchange states that many
institutional routing strategies recalibrate and will
route an order based on where trading activity is
occurring, and this recalibration could occur before
the completion of the Holding Period. See id.
11 See id.
12 See id.
13 See id. at 13964.
14 See id.
15 See id.
16 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 84 / Thursday, April 30, 2020 / Notices
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
In its original order approving M–ELO
on the Exchange, the Commission noted
its belief that the M–ELO order type
could create additional and more
efficient trading opportunities on the
Exchange for investors with longer
investment time horizons, including
institutional investors, and could
provide these investors with an ability
to limit the information leakage and the
market impact that could result from
their orders.18 In its order approving M–
ELO+CB, the Commission noted its
belief that, as with M–ELOs, M–
ELO+CBs represent a reasonable effort
to further enhance the ability of longerterm trading interest to participate
effectively on an exchange.19 A
commenter expressed concern that the
proposal would defeat the original
intent of M–ELOs and that M–ELOs
would lose a significant amount of
protection as a result of the shortened
Holding Period.20 The commenter asked
how the Exchange determined to
propose the ten-millisecond Holding
Period, and expressed its belief that the
proposal would result in more
information leakage and therefore most
long-term investors would decide to no
longer use M–ELOs.21 In response, the
Exchange disagreed that the proposal
would cause M–ELOs and M–ELO+CBs
to lose a significant amount of
protection to the detriment of long-term
investors and referenced the discussion
in the Notice regarding how the
Exchange selected the proposed tenmillisecond Holding Period.22 The
Exchange also stated that even if the
commenter was correct in asserting that
the proposal would diminish the
protective power of M–ELOs and M–
ELO+CBs, that conclusion should have
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
18 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82825
(March 7, 2018), 83 FR 10937, 10938–39 (March 13,
2018) (order approving SR–NASDAQ–2017–074).
19 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86938
(September 11, 2019), 84 FR 48978, 48980–81
(September 17, 2019) (order approving SR–
NASDAQ–2019–048).
20 See letter from Sal Arnuk and Joseph Saluzzi,
Partners and Co-Founders, Themis Trading LLC, to
Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission, dated
April 14, 2020 (‘‘Themis Letter’’).
21 See id. at 3. The commenter further believes
that, if the proposal is approved by the
Commission, brokers that utilize M–ELOs should
notify their clients of the change. See id.
22 See letter from Brett M. Kitt, Associate Vice
President and Principal Senior Associate General
Counsel, Nasdaq, to Vanessa Countryman,
Secretary, Commission, dated April 21, 2020
(‘‘Nasdaq Response Letter’’). See also Notice, supra
note 3, at 13963.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Apr 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
no bearing on whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act.23
The Commission notes that, with the
proposed ten-millisecond Holding
Period and Resting Period, M–ELOs and
M–ELO+CBs would continue to be
optional order types that are available to
investors with longer investment time
horizons, including institutional
investors. The Commission also believes
that the proposal could make M–ELOs
and M–ELO+CBs more attractive for
securities that on average have a timeto-execution of less than one-half
second and, for investors who currently
do not use M–ELOs and M–ELO+CBs
for these securities, provide optional
order types that could enhance their
ability to participate effectively on the
Exchange. The Commission notes that,
if market participants determine that the
proposal would make M–ELOs and M–
ELO+CBs less attractive for their
particular investment objectives, such
market participants may elect to reduce
or eliminate their use of these optional
order types. Moreover, as noted above,
the Exchange will continue to conduct
real-time surveillance to monitor the use
of M–ELOs and M–ELO+CBs to ensure
that such usage remains appropriately
tied to the intent of the order types.24 If,
as a result of such surveillance, the
Exchange determines that the shortened
Holding Period does not serve its
intended purpose or adversely impacts
market quality, the Exchange would
seek to make further recalibrations.25
Based on the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,26 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2020–011) be, and hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–09123 Filed 4–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
23 See Nasdaq Response Letter, supra note 22, at
2. The Exchange also sought to correct certain M–
ELO trading volume statistics included in the
Themis Letter. See id.
24 See supra note 13 and accompanying text.
25 See supra note 14 and accompanying text.
26 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
27 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24069
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88737; File No. SR–
NYSEArca-2020–31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 2, To Modify Rule
6.60–O Regarding the Treatment of
Orders Subject to Trade Collar
Protection
April 24, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on April 9,
2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. On April 22, 2020, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change. On April 23,
2020, the Exchange withdrew
Amendment No. 1 and filed
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change, which superseded and replaced
the proposed rule change in its entirety.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 2, from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
6.60–O (Price Protection—Orders)
regarding the treatment of orders subject
to Trade Collar Protection. This
Amendment No. 2 supersedes
Amendment No. 1 and the original
filing (SR–NYSEArca-2020–31) in its
entirety. The proposed change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 84 (Thursday, April 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24068-24069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09123]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88743; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-011]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15)
To Shorten the Holding Period Requirements for Midpoint Extended Life
Orders and Midpoint Extended Life Orders Plus Continuous Book
April 24, 2020.
I. Introduction
On February 26, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Nasdaq Rules 4702(b)(14) and (b)(15) to
shorten the holding period requirements for Midpoint Extended Life
Orders (``M-ELOs'') and Midpoint Extended Life Orders Plus Continuous
Book (``M-ELO+CBs''). The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on March 10, 2020.\3\ This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88320 (March 4,
2020), 85 FR 13962 (``Notice''). Comments on the proposed rule
change can be found at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2020-011/srnasdaq2020011.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
M-ELO is an order type with a non-display order attribute that is
priced at the midpoint between the national best bid and national best
offer (``NBBO'') and that will not be eligible to execute until a
holding period of one-half second (``Holding Period'') has passed after
acceptance of the order by the system.\4\ Once a M-ELO becomes eligible
to execute, the order may only execute against other eligible M-ELOs
and M-ELO+CBs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(14).
\5\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
M-ELO+CB is an order type that has all of the characteristics and
attributes of a M-ELO, except that after satisfying its Holding Period,
in addition to executing against other eligible M-ELO+CBs and M-ELOs,
it may also execute against certain orders on the Exchange's continuous
book.\6\ Specifically, a M-ELO+CB may execute against non-displayed
orders with midpoint pegging and midpoint peg post-only orders
(collectively, ``Midpoint Orders'') resting on the Exchange's
continuous book, if: (1) The Midpoint Order has the midpoint trade now
order attribute enabled; (2) the Midpoint Order has rested on the
continuous book for at least one-half second (``Resting Period'') after
the NBBO midpoint falls within the limit price set by the participant;
(3) no other order is resting on the continuous book that has a more
aggressive price than the current NBBO midpoint; and (4) the Midpoint
Order satisfies any minimum quantity requirement of the M-ELO+CB.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(15).
\7\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange now proposes to shorten the Holding Period for M-ELOs
and M-ELO+CBs from one-half second to ten milliseconds.\8\ The Exchange
also proposes to shorten the corresponding Resting Period for Midpoint
Orders from one-half second to ten milliseconds.\9\ According to the
Exchange, after observing M-ELO and M-ELO+CB trading over the past two
years and gathering feedback from market participants (in particular,
those that trade with a longer time horizon and are concerned with
market impact), it has determined that the length of the Holding Period
should be recalibrated.\10\ The Exchange states that reducing the
Holding Period to ten milliseconds would not compromise the purpose of
the M-ELO and M-ELO+CB order types.\11\ In particular, the Exchange
states that it examined historical M-ELO executions and found that
reducing the Holding Period to ten milliseconds would not have a
material impact on its protective effect.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(14).
\9\ See proposed Nasdaq Rule 4702(b)(15).
\10\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 13963. The Exchange also
states that participants have informed the Exchange that in certain
circumstances, such as when they seek to trade symbols that on
average have a lower time-to-execution than one-half second, they
are reticent to enter M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs because the Holding
Period is too long and presents countervailing risks (i.e., the
Holding Period is longer than necessary and participants risk losing
out on favorable execution opportunities that would otherwise be
available to them had they placed a non-M-ELO or M-ELO+CB order).
See id. In addition, the Exchange states that many institutional
routing strategies recalibrate and will route an order based on
where trading activity is occurring, and this recalibration could
occur before the completion of the Holding Period. See id.
\11\ See id.
\12\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange states that it will continue to conduct real-time
surveillance to monitor the use of M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs to ensure that
such usage remains appropriately tied to the intent of the order
types.\13\ If, as a result of such surveillance, the Exchange
determines that the shortened Holding Period does not serve its
intended purpose or adversely impacts market quality, the Exchange
would seek to make further recalibrations.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See id. at 13964.
\14\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange intends to make the proposed changes effective in the
second quarter of 2020 and will publish a trader alert at least 14 days
in advance of making the proposed changes effective.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\16\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to
[[Page 24069]]
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its original order approving M-ELO on the Exchange, the
Commission noted its belief that the M-ELO order type could create
additional and more efficient trading opportunities on the Exchange for
investors with longer investment time horizons, including institutional
investors, and could provide these investors with an ability to limit
the information leakage and the market impact that could result from
their orders.\18\ In its order approving M-ELO+CB, the Commission noted
its belief that, as with M-ELOs, M-ELO+CBs represent a reasonable
effort to further enhance the ability of longer-term trading interest
to participate effectively on an exchange.\19\ A commenter expressed
concern that the proposal would defeat the original intent of M-ELOs
and that M-ELOs would lose a significant amount of protection as a
result of the shortened Holding Period.\20\ The commenter asked how the
Exchange determined to propose the ten-millisecond Holding Period, and
expressed its belief that the proposal would result in more information
leakage and therefore most long-term investors would decide to no
longer use M-ELOs.\21\ In response, the Exchange disagreed that the
proposal would cause M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs to lose a significant amount
of protection to the detriment of long-term investors and referenced
the discussion in the Notice regarding how the Exchange selected the
proposed ten-millisecond Holding Period.\22\ The Exchange also stated
that even if the commenter was correct in asserting that the proposal
would diminish the protective power of M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs, that
conclusion should have no bearing on whether the proposal is consistent
with the Act.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82825 (March 7,
2018), 83 FR 10937, 10938-39 (March 13, 2018) (order approving SR-
NASDAQ-2017-074).
\19\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86938 (September
11, 2019), 84 FR 48978, 48980-81 (September 17, 2019) (order
approving SR-NASDAQ-2019-048).
\20\ See letter from Sal Arnuk and Joseph Saluzzi, Partners and
Co-Founders, Themis Trading LLC, to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission, dated April 14, 2020 (``Themis Letter'').
\21\ See id. at 3. The commenter further believes that, if the
proposal is approved by the Commission, brokers that utilize M-ELOs
should notify their clients of the change. See id.
\22\ See letter from Brett M. Kitt, Associate Vice President and
Principal Senior Associate General Counsel, Nasdaq, to Vanessa
Countryman, Secretary, Commission, dated April 21, 2020 (``Nasdaq
Response Letter''). See also Notice, supra note 3, at 13963.
\23\ See Nasdaq Response Letter, supra note 22, at 2. The
Exchange also sought to correct certain M-ELO trading volume
statistics included in the Themis Letter. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission notes that, with the proposed ten-millisecond
Holding Period and Resting Period, M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs would continue
to be optional order types that are available to investors with longer
investment time horizons, including institutional investors. The
Commission also believes that the proposal could make M-ELOs and M-
ELO+CBs more attractive for securities that on average have a time-to-
execution of less than one-half second and, for investors who currently
do not use M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs for these securities, provide optional
order types that could enhance their ability to participate effectively
on the Exchange. The Commission notes that, if market participants
determine that the proposal would make M-ELOs and M-ELO+CBs less
attractive for their particular investment objectives, such market
participants may elect to reduce or eliminate their use of these
optional order types. Moreover, as noted above, the Exchange will
continue to conduct real-time surveillance to monitor the use of M-ELOs
and M-ELO+CBs to ensure that such usage remains appropriately tied to
the intent of the order types.\24\ If, as a result of such
surveillance, the Exchange determines that the shortened Holding Period
does not serve its intended purpose or adversely impacts market
quality, the Exchange would seek to make further recalibrations.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See supra note 13 and accompanying text.
\25\ See supra note 14 and accompanying text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\26\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2020-011) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-09123 Filed 4-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
