Certain Digital Video Receivers and Related Hardware and Software Components; Commission Decision Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation, 23843-23844 [2020-09043]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 29, 2020 / Notices
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of common alloy aluminum sheet from
Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt,
Germany, Greece, India, Indonesia,
Italy, Korea, Oman, Romania, Serbia,
Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan,
and Turkey, provided for in
subheadings 7606.11.30, 7606.11.60,
7606.12.30, 7606.12.60, 7606.91.30,
7606.91.60, 7606.92.30, and 7606.92.60
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that are alleged to be
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’) and to be subsidized by
the governments of Bahrain, Brazil,
India, and Turkey.2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigations
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
investigations under sections 703(b) or
733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary
determinations are negative, upon
notice of affirmative final
determinations in those investigations
under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the
Act. Parties that filed entries of
appearance in the preliminary phase of
the investigations need not enter a
separate appearance for the final phase
of the investigations. Industrial users,
and, if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level,
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping and
countervailing duty investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
Background
On March 9, 2020, The Aluminum
Association Common Alloy Aluminum
Sheet Working Group and its Individual
Members, Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.,
Beachwood, Ohio; Arconic, Inc.,
Bettendorf, Iowa; Constellium Rolled
Products Ravenswood, LLC,
Ravenswood, West Virginia; JW
Aluminum Company, Daniel Island,
2 85 FR 19449 (April 7, 2020) and 85 FR 19444
(April 7, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Apr 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
South Carolina; Novelis Corporation,
Atlanta, Georgia; and Texarkana
Aluminum, Inc., Texarkana, Texas filed
petitions with the Commission and
Commerce, alleging that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
or threatened with material injury by
reason of subsidized imports of common
alloy aluminum sheet from Bahrain,
Brazil, India, and Turkey and LTFV
imports of common alloy aluminum
sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia,
Egypt, Germany, Greece, India,
Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Oman, Romania,
Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain,
Taiwan, and Turkey. Accordingly,
effective March 9, 2020, the
Commission instituted countervailing
duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–639–
642 and antidumping duty investigation
Nos. 731–TA–1475–1492 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of March 13, 2020 (85
FR 14702). In light of the restrictions on
access to the Commission building due
to the COVID–19 pandemic, the
Commission conducted its conference
(originally scheduled for March 30,
2020) through written questions,
submissions of written testimony,
written responses to questions, and
postconference briefs; all persons who
requested the opportunity were
permitted to participate.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to sections
703(a) and 733(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). It completed
and filed its determinations in these
investigations on April 23, 2020. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 5049 (April 2020),
entitled Common Alloy Aluminum
Sheet from Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia,
Egypt, Germany, Greece, India,
Indonesia, Italy, Korea, Oman,
Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South
Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–639–642 and
731–TA–1475–1492 (Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 24, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–09075 Filed 4–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23843
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1103]
Certain Digital Video Receivers and
Related Hardware and Software
Components; Commission Decision
Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order
and Cease and Desist Orders;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, in this investigation and has
issued a limited exclusion order and
cease and desist orders prohibiting
importation of infringing digital video
receivers and related hardware and
software components.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2532. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
16, 2018, the Commission instituted this
investigation based on a supplemented
complaint filed on behalf of Rovi
Corporation of San Jose, California; Rovi
Guides, Inc. of San Jose, California; and
Veveo, Inc. of Andover, Massachusetts
(collectively, ‘‘Rovi’’); as well as Rovi
Technologies Corporation of San Jose,
CA. The supplemented complaint
alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based upon
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain digital video
receivers and related hardware and
software components by reason of
infringement of one or more claims of
U.S. Patent Nos. U.S. Patent No.
7,779,011 (‘‘the ’011 patent’’); 7,937,394
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
23844
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 83 / Wednesday, April 29, 2020 / Notices
(‘‘the ’394 patent’’); 7,827,585 (‘‘the ’585
patent’’); 9,294,799 (‘‘the ’799 patent’’);
9,396,741 (‘‘the ’741 patent’’); 9,578,363
(‘‘the ’363 patent’’); 9,621,956 (‘‘the ’956
patent’’); and 9,668,014 (‘‘the ’014
patent’’). 83 FR 11792 (Mar. 16, 2018).
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Comcast Corporation of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable
Communications, LLC of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable
Communications Management, LLC of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast
Business Communications, LLC of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast
Holdings Corporation of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Comcast Shared
Services, LLC of Chicago, Illinois
(collectively, ‘‘Comcast’’). Id. The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations was also
named as a party in this investigation.
Id.
The Commission previously
terminated the investigation as to
complainant Rovi Technologies
Corporation; as to the ’956, ’394, ’014,
’799, and ’363 patents in their entirety;
and as to certain claims of the ’011,
’585, and ’741 patents. Order No. 12,
unreviewed, Notice (July 24, 2018);
Order No. 33, unreviewed, Notice (Sept.
19, 2018); Order 39, unreviewed, Notice
(Oct. 25, 2018).
On June 3, 2019, the presiding ALJ
issued Order No. 47, a summary
determination (‘‘SD’’), which, inter alia,
granted Rovi’s motions for summary
determination as to importation and sale
after importation. On June 11, 2019,
Comcast filed a petition for review of
the SD. On June 18, 2019, Rovi
responded to Comcast’s petition. On
June 25, 2019, the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) responded
to Comcast’s petition.
On June 4, 2019, the ALJ issued the
final initial determination (‘‘final ID’’).
On June 17, 2019, Comcast and Rovi
each filed a petition for review of the
final ID. On June 25, 2019, Comcast and
Rovi responded to each other’s petition,
and the IA responded to both.
In addition, the Commission received
comments from Rovi on the public
interest pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(a)(4). The Commission also
received comments from the following
organizations in response to the
Commission’s notice soliciting public
interest comments, 84 FR 27804 (June
14, 2019): Tea Party Patriots Action;
Americans for Limited Government;
Frontiers of Freedom Institute; Market
Institute; and Conservatives for Property
Rights (joined by 60 Plus Association,
and Americans for Limited
Government). The Commission also
received correspondence from Rep.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Apr 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Peter King (R–N.Y.) (Sept. 19, 2019),
Rep. Jackie Speier (D–Cal.) (Sept. 6,
2019), and Rep. Steve Stivers (R–Ohio)
(Aug. 27, 2019).
On August 15, 2019, the Commission
determined to review in part the SD as
to reimportation, and not to review the
remainder of the SD. Notice at 3 (Aug.
15, 2019) (‘‘Notice of Review’’). As to
the final ID, in relevant part the
Commission terminated the
investigation with a finding of no
violation as to the ’585 and ’741 patents,
but determined to review infringement
of the ’011 patent. Id. The Commission
solicited briefing on certain questions
pertaining to infringement of the ’011
patent. Id. at 4.
On August 29, 2019, the parties filed
responses to the Commission notice,
and on September 10, 2019, Comcast
and Rovi filed replies.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the final ID and
the parties’ submissions, the
Commission has determined that
Comcast’s X1 set-top boxes are used by
Comcast’s users to directly infringe
claim 9 of the ’011 patent at Comcast’s
inducement. Thus, Comcast violated
section 337 with regard to claim 9 of the
’011 patent. The Commission declines
to reach the issue of whether there has
been a section 337 violation as to claim
1 of the ’011 patent because of the delay
and burden associated with deciding the
issue and because such a finding would
not afford any additional relief to Rovi.
Thus, the Commission need not decide
the issue. See Yingbin-Nature
(Guangdong) Wood Indus. Co. v. Int’l
Trade Comm’n, 535 F.3d 1322, 1331–32
(Fed. Cir. 2008).
The Commission has further
determined that the appropriate remedy
is: (1) A limited exclusion order
prohibiting the entry of infringing
digital video receivers and related
hardware and software components; and
(2) cease and desist orders directed to
respondents. The Commission has
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(d)
and (f), 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), do not
preclude the issuance of the limited
exclusion order or the cease and desist
orders. The Commission has determined
that a bond in the amount of zero
percent of entered value is required
during the period of Presidential review.
19 U.S.C. 1337(j)(3).
The investigation is terminated. The
Commission’s reasoning in support of
its determinations is set forth more fully
in its opinion. The Commission’s orders
and opinion were delivered to the
President and the United States Trade
Representative on the day of their
issuance.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 23, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–09043 Filed 4–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1171]
Certain Child Resistant Closures With
Slider Devices Having a User Actuated
Insertable Torpedo for Selectively
Opening the Closures and Slider
Devices Therefor; Notice of Request
for Statements on the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that,
on April 21, 2020, the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) issued
an Initial Determination Granting
Summary Determination on Violation of
Section 337 and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding
in the above-captioned investigation. On
April 22, 2020, the ALJ issued a Notice
of Errata thereto. The Commission is
soliciting comments on public interest
issues raised by the recommended
relief, should the Commission find a
violation. This notice is soliciting public
interest comments from the public only.
Parties are to file public interest
submissions pursuant to Commission
rules.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Hadorn, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3179. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 83 (Wednesday, April 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23843-23844]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-09043]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1103]
Certain Digital Video Receivers and Related Hardware and Software
Components; Commission Decision Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, in this investigation and has issued a limited
exclusion order and cease and desist orders prohibiting importation of
infringing digital video receivers and related hardware and software
components.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Esq., Office of
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 16, 2018, the Commission instituted
this investigation based on a supplemented complaint filed on behalf of
Rovi Corporation of San Jose, California; Rovi Guides, Inc. of San
Jose, California; and Veveo, Inc. of Andover, Massachusetts
(collectively, ``Rovi''); as well as Rovi Technologies Corporation of
San Jose, CA. The supplemented complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``section
337''), based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain digital video receivers and related hardware and software
components by reason of infringement of one or more claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. U.S. Patent No. 7,779,011 (``the '011 patent''); 7,937,394
[[Page 23844]]
(``the '394 patent''); 7,827,585 (``the '585 patent''); 9,294,799
(``the '799 patent''); 9,396,741 (``the '741 patent''); 9,578,363
(``the '363 patent''); 9,621,956 (``the '956 patent''); and 9,668,014
(``the '014 patent''). 83 FR 11792 (Mar. 16, 2018). The Commission's
notice of investigation named as respondents Comcast Corporation of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable Communications, LLC of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast Cable Communications Management,
LLC of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast Business Communications, LLC
of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Comcast Holdings Corporation of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Comcast Shared Services, LLC of
Chicago, Illinois (collectively, ``Comcast''). Id. The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations was also named as a party in this investigation.
Id.
The Commission previously terminated the investigation as to
complainant Rovi Technologies Corporation; as to the '956, '394, '014,
'799, and '363 patents in their entirety; and as to certain claims of
the '011, '585, and '741 patents. Order No. 12, unreviewed, Notice
(July 24, 2018); Order No. 33, unreviewed, Notice (Sept. 19, 2018);
Order 39, unreviewed, Notice (Oct. 25, 2018).
On June 3, 2019, the presiding ALJ issued Order No. 47, a summary
determination (``SD''), which, inter alia, granted Rovi's motions for
summary determination as to importation and sale after importation. On
June 11, 2019, Comcast filed a petition for review of the SD. On June
18, 2019, Rovi responded to Comcast's petition. On June 25, 2019, the
Commission investigative attorney (``IA'') responded to Comcast's
petition.
On June 4, 2019, the ALJ issued the final initial determination
(``final ID''). On June 17, 2019, Comcast and Rovi each filed a
petition for review of the final ID. On June 25, 2019, Comcast and Rovi
responded to each other's petition, and the IA responded to both.
In addition, the Commission received comments from Rovi on the
public interest pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4). The
Commission also received comments from the following organizations in
response to the Commission's notice soliciting public interest
comments, 84 FR 27804 (June 14, 2019): Tea Party Patriots Action;
Americans for Limited Government; Frontiers of Freedom Institute;
Market Institute; and Conservatives for Property Rights (joined by 60
Plus Association, and Americans for Limited Government). The Commission
also received correspondence from Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) (Sept. 19,
2019), Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Cal.) (Sept. 6, 2019), and Rep. Steve
Stivers (R-Ohio) (Aug. 27, 2019).
On August 15, 2019, the Commission determined to review in part the
SD as to reimportation, and not to review the remainder of the SD.
Notice at 3 (Aug. 15, 2019) (``Notice of Review''). As to the final ID,
in relevant part the Commission terminated the investigation with a
finding of no violation as to the '585 and '741 patents, but determined
to review infringement of the '011 patent. Id. The Commission solicited
briefing on certain questions pertaining to infringement of the '011
patent. Id. at 4.
On August 29, 2019, the parties filed responses to the Commission
notice, and on September 10, 2019, Comcast and Rovi filed replies.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
final ID and the parties' submissions, the Commission has determined
that Comcast's X1 set-top boxes are used by Comcast's users to directly
infringe claim 9 of the '011 patent at Comcast's inducement. Thus,
Comcast violated section 337 with regard to claim 9 of the '011 patent.
The Commission declines to reach the issue of whether there has been a
section 337 violation as to claim 1 of the '011 patent because of the
delay and burden associated with deciding the issue and because such a
finding would not afford any additional relief to Rovi. Thus, the
Commission need not decide the issue. See Yingbin-Nature (Guangdong)
Wood Indus. Co. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 535 F.3d 1322, 1331-32 (Fed.
Cir. 2008).
The Commission has further determined that the appropriate remedy
is: (1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the entry of infringing
digital video receivers and related hardware and software components;
and (2) cease and desist orders directed to respondents. The Commission
has determined that the public interest factors enumerated in section
337(d) and (f), 19 U.S.C. 1337(d), (f), do not preclude the issuance of
the limited exclusion order or the cease and desist orders. The
Commission has determined that a bond in the amount of zero percent of
entered value is required during the period of Presidential review. 19
U.S.C. 1337(j)(3).
The investigation is terminated. The Commission's reasoning in
support of its determinations is set forth more fully in its opinion.
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President and
the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 23, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-09043 Filed 4-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P