Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 6, Section 5, Titled Transfer of Positions, 22762-22767 [2020-08591]
Download as PDF
22762
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
under the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 (together with the Trust, the
‘‘Applicants’’).
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on July 16, 2019 and amended on
October 4, 2019 and February 5, 2020.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by emailing the Commission’s
Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov
and serving applicants with a copy of
the request by email. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on May 12, 2020, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under
the Act, hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, any
facts bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
emailing the Commission’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.
ADDRESSES: The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants:
fundops@cornerstonecapinc.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay
M. Williamson, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551–3393, or David Nicolardi, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6825 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file
number, or an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Summary of the Application
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
1. The Adviser serves or will serve as
the investment adviser to the
Subadvised Series pursuant to an
investment advisory agreement with the
Trust (each, an ‘‘Investment
Management Agreement’’ and,
collectively, the ‘‘Investment
Management Agreements’’).1 The
1 Applicants request relief with respect to any
existing or future series of the Trust and any other
existing or future registered open-end management
company or series thereof that intends to rely on the
requested order and that: (a) Is advised by the
Adviser, or any person controlling, controlled by or
under common control with the Adviser or its
successors; (b) uses the multi-manager structure
described in the application; and (c) complies with
the terms and conditions of the application (each,
a ‘‘Subadvised Series’’). For purposes of the
requested order, ‘‘successor’’ is limited to an entity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
Adviser provides or will provide the
Subadvised Series with continuous and
comprehensive investment management
services, subject to the supervision of,
and policies established by, the Trust’s
board of trustees (the ‘‘Board’’). The
Investment Management Agreement
permits the Adviser, subject to the
approval of the Board, to delegate to one
or more Sub-Advisers the responsibility
to provide the day-to-day portfolio
investment management of each
Subadvised Series, subject to the
supervision and direction of the
Adviser.2 The primary responsibility for
managing the Subadvised Series will
remain vested in the Adviser. The
Adviser will hire, evaluate, allocate
assets to and oversee the Sub-Advisers,
including determining whether a SubAdviser should be terminated, at all
times subject to the authority of the
Board.
2. Applicants request an exemption to
permit the Adviser, subject to Board
approval, to enter into investment subadvisory agreements with NonAffiliated Sub-Advisers (each, a ‘‘SubAdvisory Agreement’’) and materially
amend such Sub-Advisory Agreements
without obtaining the shareholder
approval required under section 15(a) of
the Act and rule 18f–2 under the Act.3
Applicants also seek an exemption from
the Disclosure Requirements to permit a
Subadvised Series to disclose (as both a
dollar amount and a percentage of the
Subadvised Series’ net assets): (a) The
aggregate fees paid to the Adviser; (b)
the aggregate fees paid to Non-Affiliated
Sub-Advisers; and (c) the fee paid to
each Affiliated Sub-Adviser.
3. Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the terms and conditions
stated in the application. Such terms
and conditions provide for, among other
safeguards, appropriate disclosure to
Subadvised Series’ shareholders and
notification about sub-advisory changes
and enhanced Board oversight to protect
the interests of the Subadvised Series’
shareholders.
that results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization.
2 A ‘‘Sub-Adviser’’ for a Subadvised Series is an
investment sub-adviser for that Series that is not an
‘‘affiliated person’’ (as such term is defined in
Section 2(a)(3) of the Act) of the Subadvised Series
or the Adviser, except to the extent that an
affiliation arises solely because the Sub-Adviser
serves as a sub-adviser to one or more Subadvised
Series (each a ‘‘Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser’’ and
collectively, the ‘‘Non-Affiliated Sub-Advisers’’).
3 The requested relief will not extend to any subadviser which is an affiliated person, as defined in
section 2(a)(3) of the Act, of the Subadvised Series
or of its Adviser, other than by reason of serving
as a sub-adviser to one or more of the Subadvised
Series (‘‘Affiliated Sub-Adviser’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission may exempt any
person, security, or transaction or any
class or classes of persons, securities, or
transactions from any provisions of the
Act, or any rule thereunder, if such
relief is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act. Applicants
believe that the requested relief meets
this standard because, as further
explained in the application, the
Investment Management Agreements
will remain subject to shareholder
approval while the role of the SubAdvisers is substantially equivalent to
that of individual portfolio managers, so
that requiring shareholder approval of
Sub-Advisory Agreements would
impose unnecessary delays and
expenses on the Subadvised Series.
Applicants believe that the requested
relief from the Disclosure Requirements
meets this standard because it will
improve the Adviser’s ability to
negotiate fees paid to the Sub-Advisers
that are more advantageous for the
Subadvised Series.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–08582 Filed 4–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88676; File No. SR–Phlx–
2020–22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Options 6,
Section 5, Titled Transfer of Positions
April 17, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 16,
2020, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II,
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 6, Section 5, titled ‘‘Transfer of
Positions.’’ The Exchange also proposes
to update certain citations. This
proposed rule would continue to permit
market participants to move positions
from one account to another without
first exposure of the transaction on the
Phlx. The proposed rule change is
similar to Cboe Rule 6.7.3
Options 6, Section 5 specifies the
circumstances under which a member
or member organization may effect
transfers of positions to permit market
participants to move positions from one
account to another and to permit
transfers upon the occurrence of
significant, non-recurring events. The
proposed rule change is similar to Cboe
Rule 6.7.
Current Phlx Options 6, Section 5 lists
the circumstances in which a member or
member organization may transfer
positions off the floor in any class of
options listed on its books. The
circumstances currently listed include:
(1) The dissolution of a joint account in
which the remaining member or
member organization assumes the
positions of the joint account; (2) the
dissolution of a corporation or
partnership in which a former nominee
of that corporation or partnership
assumes the positions; (3) positions
transferred as part of a member or
member organization’s capital
contribution to a new joint account,
partnership, or corporation; (4) the
donation of positions to a not-for-profit
corporation; (5) the transfer of positions
to a minor under the Uniform Gifts to
Minors Act; (6) a merger or acquisition
resulting in a continuity of ownership or
management; or (7) consolidation of
accounts within a member or member
organization.
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 6, Section 5(a) which currently
provides, ‘‘A member or member
organization may transfer positions off
the floor in any class of options listed
on its books if the transfer involves one
or more of the following events. . . .’’
The Exchange proposes to instead state,
‘‘Existing positions in options listed on
the Exchange of a member or member
organization or non-member or nonmember organization that are to be
transferred on, from, or to the books of
a Clearing Member may be transferred
off the Exchange if the transfer involves
on or more of the following events.
. . .’’ The proposed rule text intends to
clarify that Options 6, Section 5 does
not apply to products other than options
listed on the Exchange, consistent with
the Exchange’s other trading rules.4 This
new rule text also clarifies that a
member or member organization must
be on at least one side of the transfer.
The proposed rule change also clarifies
that transferred positions must be on,
from, or to the books of a Clearing
Member. This language is consistent
with how transfers are currently
effected. The proposed rule change also
clarifies that existing positions of a
member or member organization or a
non-member or non-member
organization may be subject to a
transfer, except under specified
circumstances in which a transfer may
only be effected for positions of a
member or member organization.5
The Exchange notes transfers of
positions in Exchange-listed options
may also be subject to applicable laws,
3 See Securities and Exchange Act Release No.
88424 (March 19, 2020), 85 FR 16981 (March 25,
2020) (SR–Cboe–2019–035) (Notice of Filing of
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, Regarding
Off-Floor Position Transfers).
4 Proposed paragraph (h) also clarifies that the
transfer procedure only applies to positions in
options listed on the Exchange, and that transfers
of non-Exchange-listed options and other financial
instruments are not governed by Options 6, Section
5.
5 See proposed subparagraphs (a)(5) and (7).
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Options 6, Section 5, titled ‘‘Transfer of
Positions.’’ The Exchange also proposes
to update certain citations.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22763
rules, and regulations, including rules of
other self-regulatory organizations.6
Except as explicitly provided in the
proposed rule text, the proposed rule
change is not intended to exempt
position transfers from any other
applicable rules or regulations, and
proposed paragraph (g) makes this clear
in the rule.
The proposed rule change adds four
events where an transfer would be
permitted to occur.
• Proposed subparagraph (a)(1)
permits an transfer to occur if it,
pursuant to Options 9, Section 1 is an
adjustment or transfer in connection
with the correction of a bona fide error
in the recording of a transaction or the
transferring of a position to another
account, provided that the original trade
documentation confirms the error.
• Proposed subparagraph (a)(2)
permits an transfer if it is a transfer of
positions from one account to another
account where there is no change in
ownership involved (i.e., the accounts
are for the same Person),7 provided the
accounts are not in separate aggregation
units or otherwise subject to
information barrier or account
segregation requirements. The proposed
rule change provides market
participants with flexibility to maintain
positions in accounts used for the same
trading purpose in a manner consistent
with their businesses. Such transfers are
not intended to be transactions among
different market participants, as there
would be no change in ownership
permitted under the provision, and
would also not permit transfers among
different trading units for which
accounts are otherwise required to be
maintained separately.8
• Proposed subparagraph (a)(3)
similarly permits an transfer if it is a
consolidation of accounts 9 where no
change in ownership is involved.
• Proposed subparagraph (a)(10)
permits an transfer if it is a transfer of
positions through operation of law from
death, bankruptcy, or otherwise. This
provision is consistent with applicable
6 See
proposed paragraph (h).
Exchange proposes to define the term
‘‘Person’’ within this proposed Rule 1058 as ‘‘For
purposes of this rule, the term ‘‘Person’’ shall be
defined as an individual, partnership (general or
limited), joint stock company, corporation, limited
liability company, trust or unincorporated
organization, or any governmental entity or agency
or political subdivision thereof.’’ This definition is
identical to Cboe Rule 1.1.
8 Various rules (for example, Regulation SHO in
certain circumstances) require accounts to be
maintained separately, and the proposed rule
change is consistent with those rules.
9 This refers to the consolidation of entire
accounts (e.g., combining two separate accounts
(including the positions in each account into a
single account)).
7 The
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
22764
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
laws, rules, and regulations that legally
require transfers in certain
circumstances. This proposed rule
change is consistent with the purposes
of other circumstances in the current
rule, such as the transfer of positions to
a minor or dissolution of a corporation.
The Exchange believes these proposed
events have similar purposes as those in
current Options 6, Section 5, which is
to permit market participants to move
positions from one account to another
and to permit transfers upon the
occurrence of significant, non-recurring
events.10 As noted above, the proposed
rule change is consistent with current
Exchange guidance or rules of other selfregulatory organizations.
The proposed rule change renumbers
current subparagraphs (a)(1) through (5)
to be proposed subparagraphs (a)(5)
through (9) and moves current
subparagraph (a)(6) to proposed
subparagraph (a)(3), with nonsubstantive changes.
Proposed Options 6, Section (b)
codifies Exchange guidance regarding
certain restrictions on permissible
transfers related to netting of open
positions and to margin and haircut
treatment.11 No position may net against
another position (‘‘netting’’), and no
position transfer may result in
preferential margin or haircut
treatment.12 Netting occurs when long
positions and short positions in the
same series ‘‘offset’’ against each other,
leaving no or a reduced position. For
example, if a member or member
organization wanted to transfer 100 long
calls to another account that contained
short calls of the same options series as
well as other positions, even if the
transfer is permitted pursuant to one of
the 10 permissible events listed in the
proposed Rule, the member or member
organization could not transfer the
offsetting series, as they would net
against each other and close the
positions.13
However, netting is permitted for
transfers on behalf of a Market Maker
account for transactions in multiply
listed options series on different options
exchanges, but only if the Market Maker
nominees are trading for the same
member or member organization, and
the options transactions on the different
options exchanges clear into separate
exchange-specific accounts because they
10 See
proposed paragraph (g).
Phlx Options 6, Section 5(c).
12 For example, positions may not transfer from
a customer, joint back office, or firm account to a
Market Maker account. However, positions may
transfer from a Market Maker account to a customer,
joint back office, or firm account (assuming no
netting of positions occurs).
13 See Cboe Rule 6.7(b).
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
cannot easily clear into the same Market
Maker account at the Clearing
Corporation. In such instances, all
Market Maker positions in the
exchange-specific accounts for the
multiply listed class would be
automatically transferred on their trade
date into one central Market Maker
account (commonly referred to as a
‘‘universal account’’) at the Clearing
Corporation. Positions cleared into a
universal account would automatically
net against each other. Options
exchanges permit different naming
conventions with respect to Market
Maker account acronyms (for example,
lettering versus numbering and number
of characters), which are used for
accounts at the Clearing Corporation. A
Market Maker may have a nominee with
an appointment in class XYZ on Phlx,
and have another nominee with an
appointment in class XYZ on ISE, but
due to account acronym naming
conventions, those nominees may need
to clear their transactions into separate
accounts (one for Phlx transactions and
another for ISE transactions) at the
Clearing Corporation rather into a
universal account (in which account the
positions may net). The proposed rule
change permits transfers from these
separate exchange-specific accounts into
the Market Maker’s universal account in
this circumstance to achieve this
purpose.
Transfer Price
Currently Options 6, Section 5(c)
provides, in part, that ‘‘members and
member organizations must transfer
positions pursuant to this Rule at the
same prices that appear on the books of
the transferring member or member
organization, and the transfer must
indicate the date when the original trade
was made. In the course of transferring
positions, no position shall net itself
against another position.’’ The Exchange
instead proposes to state within Options
6, Section 5(c) that the transfer price, to
the extent it is consistent with
applicable laws, rules, and regulations,
including rules of other self-regulatory
organizations, and tax and accounting
rules and regulations, at which an
transfer is effected may be: (1) The
original trade prices of the positions that
appear on the books of the trading
Clearing Member, in which case the
records of the transfer must indicate the
original trade dates for the positions;
provided, transfers to correct bona fide
errors pursuant to proposed
subparagraph (a)(1) must be transferred
at the correct original trade prices; (2)
mark-to-market prices of the positions at
the close of trading on the transfer date;
(3) mark-to-market prices of the
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
positions at the close of trading on the
trade date prior to the transfer date; 14 or
(4) the then-current market price of the
positions at the time the transfer is
effected.15 The proposed rule text
regarding permissible transfer prices
provides market participants with
flexibility to determine the transfer
price at which the transfer may be
effected. The Exchange proposes the
four options noted above with respect to
the transfer price.
This proposed rule change provides
market participants that effect
transactions with flexibility to select a
transfer price based on circumstances of
the transfer and their business.
However, for corrections of bona fide
errors, because those transfers are
necessary to correct processing errors
that occurred at the time of transaction,
those transfers would occur at the
original transaction price, as the
purpose of the transfer is to create the
originally intended result of the
transaction.
Prior Written Notice
Current Phlx Options 6, Section 5(b)
provides, ‘‘members and member
organizations must notify the Exchange
in writing prior to effecting an off the
floor transfer. The written notification
must indicate the positions to be
transferred and the reason for the
transfer.’’ Proposed Options 6, Section
5(d) requires a member or member
organization and its Clearing Member
(to the extent that the member or
member organization is not selfclearing) to submit to the Exchange, in
a manner determined by the Exchange,
written notice prior to effecting an
transfer from or to the account of a
member or member organization(s).16
The notice must indicate: The
Exchange-listed options positions to be
transferred; the nature of the
transaction; the enumerated provision(s)
under proposed paragraph (a) pursuant
to which the positions are being
transferred; the name of the
counterparty(ies); the anticipated
transfer date; the method for
determining the transfer price; and any
other information requested by the
Exchange.17 The proposed notice will
continue to ensure the Exchange is
14 For example, for a transfer that occurs on a
Tuesday, the transfer price may be based on the
closing market price on Monday.
15 See Cboe Rule 6.7(c).
16 This notice provision applies only to transfers
involving a member’s or member organization’s
positions and not to positions of non-member and
non-member organization parties, as they are not
subject to the Rules. In addition, no notice would
be required to effect transfers to correct bona fide
errors pursuant to proposed subparagraph (a)(1).
17 See Cboe Rule 6.7(d).
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
aware of all transfers so that it can
monitor and review them (including the
records that must be retained pursuant
to proposed paragraph (e)) to determine
whether they are effected in accordance
with the Rules. The proposed rule text
requires additional information with
respect to the prior written notification
that is required to effect a transfer.
Additionally, requiring notice from
the member or member organization(s)
and its Clearing Member(s) will ensure
both parties are in agreement with
respect to the terms of the transfer. As
noted in proposed subparagraph (d)(2),
receipt of notice of an transfer does not
constitute a determination by the
Exchange that the transfer was effected
or reported in conformity with the
requirements of proposed Section 10(b).
Notwithstanding submission of written
notice to the Exchange, member or
member organizations and Clearing
Members that effect transfers that do not
conform to the requirements of
proposed Section 10(b) will be subject
to appropriate disciplinary action in
accordance with the Rules.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Records
Current Phlx Rule at Options 6,
Section 5(c) provides, in part, Each
member or member organization that is
a party to a transfer of positions must
make and retain records stating the
nature of the transaction, the name of
the counter-party, and any other
information required by the Exchange.
Proposed Options 6, Section 5(e)
requires each member or member
organization and each Clearing Member
that is a party to a transfer must make
and retain records of the information
provided in the written notice to the
Exchange pursuant to proposed
subparagraph (e)(1), as well as
information on the actual Exchangelisted options that are ultimately
transferred, the actual transfer date, and
the actual transfer price (and the
original trade dates, if applicable), and
any other information the Exchange may
request the member or member
organization or Clearing Member
provide.18 The records requirement is
enhanced to require additional
information that must be maintained by
members, member organizations and
each Clearing Member that is a party to
a transfer.
Presidential Exemption
Proposed paragraph (f) provides
exemptions approved by the Exchange’s
Chief Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee). Specifically, this
provision is in addition to the
18 See
Cboe Rule 6.7(e).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
exemptions set forth in proposed
paragraph (a). The Exchange proposes
that the Exchange Chief Executive
Officer or President (or senior-level
designee) may grant an exemption from
the requirement of this proposed Rule,
on his or her own motion or upon
application of the member or member
organization (with respect to the
member’s or member organization’s
positions) or a Clearing Member (with
respect to positions carried and cleared
by the Clearing Members). The Chief
Executive Officer, the President or his or
her designee, may permit an a transfer
if necessary or appropriate for the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and the protection of investors
and is in the public interest, including
due to unusual or extraordinary
circumstances. For example, an
exemption may be granted if the market
value of the Person’s positions would be
compromised by having to comply with
the requirement to trade on the
Exchange pursuant to the normal
auction process or when, in the
judgment of the Chief Executive Officer,
President or his or her designee, market
conditions make trading on the
Exchange impractical.19
Routine, Recurring Transfers
The Exchange proposes within
Options 6, Section 5(g) that that the
transfer procedure set forth in Options
6, Section 5 is intended to facilitate nonroutine, nonrecurring movements of
positions.20 The transfer procedure is
not to be used repeatedly or routinely in
circumvention of the normal auction
market process.
Exchange-Listed Options
The Exchange proposes within
Options 6, Section 5(h) notes that the
transfer procedure set forth in Options
6, Section 5 is only applicable to
positions in options listed on the
Exchange. Transfers of positions in
Exchange-listed options may also be
subject to applicable laws, rules, and
regulations, including rules of other
self-regulatory organizations. Transfers
of non-Exchange listed options and
other financial instruments are not
governed by this Rule.21
Updating Citations
The Exchange recently relocated its
rules into a new Rulebook Shell.22
Certain rule citations within General 2,
19 See
Cboe Rule 6.7(f).
20 See Cboe Rule 6.7(g).
21 See Cboe Rule 6.7(h).
22 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88213
(February 14, 2020), 85 FR 9859 (February 20, 2020)
(SR–Phlx–2020–03) (‘‘Phlx Rulebook Relocation
Rule Change’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22765
Section 4; Options 2, Section 6; Options
7, Section 4; Options 8, Section 28;
Section 39, B–6 and C–2 were
inadvertently not updated. The
Exchange proposes to update those
citations and also remove an
unnecessary header within General 9,
Section 58.23
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,24 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,25
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes
the proposed transfer rule is consistent
with the Section 6(b)(5) 26 requirements
that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Additionally, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 27 requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that permitting
the transfers in very limited
circumstances, such as where there is
no change in beneficial ownership, a
transfer by operation of law or an
adjustment or transfer in connection
with the correction of a bona fide error,
is reasonable to allow a member or
member organization to accomplish
certain goals efficiently. The Exchange
currently permits transfers in situations
involving dissolutions of entities or
accounts, for purposes of donations or
mergers. For example, a member or
member organization that is undergoing
a structural change and a one-time
movement of positions may require a
23 The header ‘‘SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION REGARDING RULE 605’’ is
unnecessary as the language which follows explains
the text.
24 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
25 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
26 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
27 Id.
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
22766
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
transfer of positions or a member or
member organization that is leaving a
firm that will no longer be in business
may require a transfer of positions to
another firm. Also, a member or member
organization may require a transfer of
positions to make a capital contribution.
The above-referenced circumstances are
non-recurring situations where the
transferor continues to maintain some
ownership interest or manage the
positions transferred. By contrast,
repeated or routine transfers between
entities or accounts—even if there is no
change in beneficial ownership as a
result of the transfer—is inconsistent
with the purposes for which the
proposed rule was adopted.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
such activity should not be permitted
under the rules and thus, seeks to adopt
language in proposed paragraph (f) to
proposed Options 6, Section 5 that the
transfer of positions procedures set forth
the proposed rule are intended to
facilitate non-recurring movements of
positions.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change benefits investors, as it adds
transparency to the Rules. The purpose
of the additional circumstances in
which market participants may conduct
transfers is consistent with the purpose
of the circumstances currently
permitted in the proposed rule.
Therefore, the proposed rule change
will provide market participants that
experience these limited, non-recurring
events with an efficient and effective
means to transfer positions in these
situations. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change regarding
permissible transfer prices provides
market participants with flexibility to
determine the price appropriate for their
business, which maintain cost bases in
accordance with normal accounting
practices and removes impediments to a
free and open market.
The proposed rule change which
requires notice and maintenance of
records will ensure the Exchange is able
to review transfers for compliance with
the Rules, which prevents fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices.
The requirement to retain records is
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17a–3 and 17a–4 under the Act.
Similar to Cboe Rule 6.7, the
Exchange would permit a presidential
exemption. The Exchange believes that
this exemption is consistent with the
Act because the Exchange’s Chief
Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee) would consider
an exemption in very limited
circumstances. The transfer process is
intended to facilitate non-routine,
nonrecurring movements of positions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
and, therefore, is not to be used
repeatedly or routinely in
circumvention of the normal auction
market process. Proposed Options 6,
Section 5(f) specifically provides within
the rule text that the Exchange’s Chief
Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee) may in his or her
judgment allow a transfer if it is
necessary or appropriate for the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market and the protection of investors
and is in the public interest, including
due to unusual or extraordinary
circumstances such as the market value
of the Person’s positions will be
comprised by having to comply with the
requirement to trade on the Exchange
pursuant to the normal auction process
or, when in the judgment of President
or his or her designee, market
conditions make trading on the
Exchange impractical. These standards
within proposed Options 6, Section 5(f)
are intended to provide guidance
concerning the use of this exemption
which is intended to provide the
Exchange with the ability to utilize the
exemption for the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market and the protection of
investors and is in the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
exemption is consistent with the Act
because it would allow the Exchange’s
Chief Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee) to act in certain
situations which comply with the
guidance within Options 6, Section 5(f)
which are intended to protect investors
and the general public. While Cboe
grants an exemption to the President (or
senior-level designee),28 the Exchange
has elected to grant an exemption to
Exchange’s Chief Executive Officer or
President (or senior-level designee),
who are similarly situated with the
organization as senior-level individuals.
Updating Citations
Updating rule citations and removing
unnecessary text will bring greater
clarity to the Rulebook.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe the
proposed rule change will impose an
undue burden on intra-market
competition as the transfer procedure
may be utilized by any member or
member organization and the rule will
apply uniformly to all members or
28 See
PO 00000
Cboe Rule 6.7(f).
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
member organizations. Use of the
transfer procedure is voluntary, and all
members or member organizations may
use the procedure to transfer positions
as long as the criteria in the proposed
rule are satisfied. With this change, a
member or member organization that
experiences limited permissible, nonrecurring events would have an efficient
and effective means to transfer positions
in these situations. The Exchange
believes the proposed rule change
regarding permissible transfer prices
provides market participants with
flexibility to determine the price
appropriate for their business, which
determine prices in accordance with
normal accounting practices and
removes impediments to a free and open
market. The Exchange does not believe
the proposed notice and record
requirements are unduly burdensome to
market participants. The Exchange
believes the proposed requirements are
reasonable and will ensure the
Exchange is aware of transfers and
would be able to monitor and review the
transfers to ensure the transfer falls
within the proposed rule.
Adopting an exemption, similar to
Cboe Rule 6.7, to permit the Exchange’s
Chief Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee) to grant an
exemption to Options 6, Section 5(a)
prohibition if, in his or her judgment,
does not impose an undue burden on
competition. Circumstances where, due
to unusual or extraordinary
circumstances such as the market value
of the Person’s positions would be
comprised by having to comply with the
requirement to trade on the Exchange
pursuant to the normal auction process
or, would be taken into consideration in
each case where, in the judgment of the
Exchange’s Chief Executive Officer or
President (or senior-level designee),
market conditions make trading on the
Exchange impractical.
The Exchange does not believe the
proposed rule change will impose an
undue burden on inter-market
competition. The proposed position
transfer procedure is not intended to be
a competitive trading tool. The
proposed rule change permits, in
limited circumstances, a transfer to
facilitate non-routine, nonrecurring
movements of positions. As provided
for in proposed Options 6, Section 5(g),
it would not be used repeatedly or
routinely in circumvention of the
normal auction market process.
Proposed Options 6, Section 5(a)
specifically provides within the rule
text that the Exchange’s Chief Executive
Officer or President (or senior-level
designee) may in his or her judgment
allow a transfer for the maintenance of
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 79 / Thursday, April 23, 2020 / Notices
a fair and orderly market and the
protection of investors and is in the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that the exemption does not impose an
undue burden on competition as the
Exchange’s Chief Executive Officer or
President (or senior-level designee)
would apply the exemption consistent
with the guidance within Options 6,
Section 5(f). Additionally, as discussed
above, the proposed rule change is
similar to Cboe Rule 6.7. The Exchange
believes having similar rules related to
transfer positions to those of other
options exchanges will reduce the
administrative burden on market
participants of determining whether
their transfers comply with multiple
sets of rules.
Updating Citations
The updates to the rule citations and
removal of unnecessary rule text are
non-substantive rule changes.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 29 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.30
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not
become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing. However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 31 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Commission notes that waiver of the
operative delay would provide members
with the ability to request a transfer, for
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
29 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
31 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
30 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:28 Apr 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
22767
limited, non-recurring types of transfers,
without the need for exposing those
orders on the Exchange, similar to
Cboe.32 The Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission waives
the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.33
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2020–22 and should
be submitted on or before May 14, 2020.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.34
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
Phlx–2020–22 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2020–22. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
32 See
CBOE Rule 6.7.
purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
33 For
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2020–08591 Filed 4–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–88677; File No. SR–NYSE–
2019–54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change
To Permit the Exchange To List and
Trade Exchange Traded Products
April 17, 2020.
On October 3, 2019, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to list and trade Exchange
Traded Products that have a component
NMS Stock listed on the Exchange or
that are based on, or represent an
interest in, an underlying index or
reference asset that includes an NMS
Stock listed on the Exchange. The
proposed rule change was published for
34 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 79 (Thursday, April 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22762-22767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88676; File No. SR-Phlx-2020-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 6,
Section 5, Titled Transfer of Positions
April 17, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 16, 2020, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 22763]]
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 6, Section 5, titled
``Transfer of Positions.'' The Exchange also proposes to update certain
citations.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 6, Section 5, titled
``Transfer of Positions.'' The Exchange also proposes to update certain
citations. This proposed rule would continue to permit market
participants to move positions from one account to another without
first exposure of the transaction on the Phlx. The proposed rule change
is similar to Cboe Rule 6.7.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 88424 (March 19,
2020), 85 FR 16981 (March 25, 2020) (SR-Cboe-2019-035) (Notice of
Filing of Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1
and 2, Regarding Off-Floor Position Transfers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Options 6, Section 5 specifies the circumstances under which a
member or member organization may effect transfers of positions to
permit market participants to move positions from one account to
another and to permit transfers upon the occurrence of significant,
non-recurring events. The proposed rule change is similar to Cboe Rule
6.7.
Current Phlx Options 6, Section 5 lists the circumstances in which
a member or member organization may transfer positions off the floor in
any class of options listed on its books. The circumstances currently
listed include: (1) The dissolution of a joint account in which the
remaining member or member organization assumes the positions of the
joint account; (2) the dissolution of a corporation or partnership in
which a former nominee of that corporation or partnership assumes the
positions; (3) positions transferred as part of a member or member
organization's capital contribution to a new joint account,
partnership, or corporation; (4) the donation of positions to a not-
for-profit corporation; (5) the transfer of positions to a minor under
the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act; (6) a merger or acquisition resulting
in a continuity of ownership or management; or (7) consolidation of
accounts within a member or member organization.
The Exchange proposes to amend Options 6, Section 5(a) which
currently provides, ``A member or member organization may transfer
positions off the floor in any class of options listed on its books if
the transfer involves one or more of the following events. . . .'' The
Exchange proposes to instead state, ``Existing positions in options
listed on the Exchange of a member or member organization or non-member
or non-member organization that are to be transferred on, from, or to
the books of a Clearing Member may be transferred off the Exchange if
the transfer involves on or more of the following events. . . .'' The
proposed rule text intends to clarify that Options 6, Section 5 does
not apply to products other than options listed on the Exchange,
consistent with the Exchange's other trading rules.\4\ This new rule
text also clarifies that a member or member organization must be on at
least one side of the transfer. The proposed rule change also clarifies
that transferred positions must be on, from, or to the books of a
Clearing Member. This language is consistent with how transfers are
currently effected. The proposed rule change also clarifies that
existing positions of a member or member organization or a non-member
or non-member organization may be subject to a transfer, except under
specified circumstances in which a transfer may only be effected for
positions of a member or member organization.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Proposed paragraph (h) also clarifies that the transfer
procedure only applies to positions in options listed on the
Exchange, and that transfers of non-Exchange-listed options and
other financial instruments are not governed by Options 6, Section
5.
\5\ See proposed subparagraphs (a)(5) and (7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes transfers of positions in Exchange-listed
options may also be subject to applicable laws, rules, and regulations,
including rules of other self-regulatory organizations.\6\ Except as
explicitly provided in the proposed rule text, the proposed rule change
is not intended to exempt position transfers from any other applicable
rules or regulations, and proposed paragraph (g) makes this clear in
the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See proposed paragraph (h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change adds four events where an transfer would
be permitted to occur.
Proposed subparagraph (a)(1) permits an transfer to occur
if it, pursuant to Options 9, Section 1 is an adjustment or transfer in
connection with the correction of a bona fide error in the recording of
a transaction or the transferring of a position to another account,
provided that the original trade documentation confirms the error.
Proposed subparagraph (a)(2) permits an transfer if it is
a transfer of positions from one account to another account where there
is no change in ownership involved (i.e., the accounts are for the same
Person),\7\ provided the accounts are not in separate aggregation units
or otherwise subject to information barrier or account segregation
requirements. The proposed rule change provides market participants
with flexibility to maintain positions in accounts used for the same
trading purpose in a manner consistent with their businesses. Such
transfers are not intended to be transactions among different market
participants, as there would be no change in ownership permitted under
the provision, and would also not permit transfers among different
trading units for which accounts are otherwise required to be
maintained separately.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Exchange proposes to define the term ``Person'' within
this proposed Rule 1058 as ``For purposes of this rule, the term
``Person'' shall be defined as an individual, partnership (general
or limited), joint stock company, corporation, limited liability
company, trust or unincorporated organization, or any governmental
entity or agency or political subdivision thereof.'' This definition
is identical to Cboe Rule 1.1.
\8\ Various rules (for example, Regulation SHO in certain
circumstances) require accounts to be maintained separately, and the
proposed rule change is consistent with those rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed subparagraph (a)(3) similarly permits an transfer
if it is a consolidation of accounts \9\ where no change in ownership
is involved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ This refers to the consolidation of entire accounts (e.g.,
combining two separate accounts (including the positions in each
account into a single account)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed subparagraph (a)(10) permits an transfer if it is
a transfer of positions through operation of law from death,
bankruptcy, or otherwise. This provision is consistent with applicable
[[Page 22764]]
laws, rules, and regulations that legally require transfers in certain
circumstances. This proposed rule change is consistent with the
purposes of other circumstances in the current rule, such as the
transfer of positions to a minor or dissolution of a corporation.
The Exchange believes these proposed events have similar purposes
as those in current Options 6, Section 5, which is to permit market
participants to move positions from one account to another and to
permit transfers upon the occurrence of significant, non-recurring
events.\10\ As noted above, the proposed rule change is consistent with
current Exchange guidance or rules of other self-regulatory
organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See proposed paragraph (g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change renumbers current subparagraphs (a)(1)
through (5) to be proposed subparagraphs (a)(5) through (9) and moves
current subparagraph (a)(6) to proposed subparagraph (a)(3), with non-
substantive changes.
Proposed Options 6, Section (b) codifies Exchange guidance
regarding certain restrictions on permissible transfers related to
netting of open positions and to margin and haircut treatment.\11\ No
position may net against another position (``netting''), and no
position transfer may result in preferential margin or haircut
treatment.\12\ Netting occurs when long positions and short positions
in the same series ``offset'' against each other, leaving no or a
reduced position. For example, if a member or member organization
wanted to transfer 100 long calls to another account that contained
short calls of the same options series as well as other positions, even
if the transfer is permitted pursuant to one of the 10 permissible
events listed in the proposed Rule, the member or member organization
could not transfer the offsetting series, as they would net against
each other and close the positions.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Phlx Options 6, Section 5(c).
\12\ For example, positions may not transfer from a customer,
joint back office, or firm account to a Market Maker account.
However, positions may transfer from a Market Maker account to a
customer, joint back office, or firm account (assuming no netting of
positions occurs).
\13\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
However, netting is permitted for transfers on behalf of a Market
Maker account for transactions in multiply listed options series on
different options exchanges, but only if the Market Maker nominees are
trading for the same member or member organization, and the options
transactions on the different options exchanges clear into separate
exchange-specific accounts because they cannot easily clear into the
same Market Maker account at the Clearing Corporation. In such
instances, all Market Maker positions in the exchange-specific accounts
for the multiply listed class would be automatically transferred on
their trade date into one central Market Maker account (commonly
referred to as a ``universal account'') at the Clearing Corporation.
Positions cleared into a universal account would automatically net
against each other. Options exchanges permit different naming
conventions with respect to Market Maker account acronyms (for example,
lettering versus numbering and number of characters), which are used
for accounts at the Clearing Corporation. A Market Maker may have a
nominee with an appointment in class XYZ on Phlx, and have another
nominee with an appointment in class XYZ on ISE, but due to account
acronym naming conventions, those nominees may need to clear their
transactions into separate accounts (one for Phlx transactions and
another for ISE transactions) at the Clearing Corporation rather into a
universal account (in which account the positions may net). The
proposed rule change permits transfers from these separate exchange-
specific accounts into the Market Maker's universal account in this
circumstance to achieve this purpose.
Transfer Price
Currently Options 6, Section 5(c) provides, in part, that ``members
and member organizations must transfer positions pursuant to this Rule
at the same prices that appear on the books of the transferring member
or member organization, and the transfer must indicate the date when
the original trade was made. In the course of transferring positions,
no position shall net itself against another position.'' The Exchange
instead proposes to state within Options 6, Section 5(c) that the
transfer price, to the extent it is consistent with applicable laws,
rules, and regulations, including rules of other self-regulatory
organizations, and tax and accounting rules and regulations, at which
an transfer is effected may be: (1) The original trade prices of the
positions that appear on the books of the trading Clearing Member, in
which case the records of the transfer must indicate the original trade
dates for the positions; provided, transfers to correct bona fide
errors pursuant to proposed subparagraph (a)(1) must be transferred at
the correct original trade prices; (2) mark-to-market prices of the
positions at the close of trading on the transfer date; (3) mark-to-
market prices of the positions at the close of trading on the trade
date prior to the transfer date; \14\ or (4) the then-current market
price of the positions at the time the transfer is effected.\15\ The
proposed rule text regarding permissible transfer prices provides
market participants with flexibility to determine the transfer price at
which the transfer may be effected. The Exchange proposes the four
options noted above with respect to the transfer price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For example, for a transfer that occurs on a Tuesday, the
transfer price may be based on the closing market price on Monday.
\15\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule change provides market participants that effect
transactions with flexibility to select a transfer price based on
circumstances of the transfer and their business. However, for
corrections of bona fide errors, because those transfers are necessary
to correct processing errors that occurred at the time of transaction,
those transfers would occur at the original transaction price, as the
purpose of the transfer is to create the originally intended result of
the transaction.
Prior Written Notice
Current Phlx Options 6, Section 5(b) provides, ``members and member
organizations must notify the Exchange in writing prior to effecting an
off the floor transfer. The written notification must indicate the
positions to be transferred and the reason for the transfer.'' Proposed
Options 6, Section 5(d) requires a member or member organization and
its Clearing Member (to the extent that the member or member
organization is not self-clearing) to submit to the Exchange, in a
manner determined by the Exchange, written notice prior to effecting an
transfer from or to the account of a member or member
organization(s).\16\ The notice must indicate: The Exchange-listed
options positions to be transferred; the nature of the transaction; the
enumerated provision(s) under proposed paragraph (a) pursuant to which
the positions are being transferred; the name of the counterparty(ies);
the anticipated transfer date; the method for determining the transfer
price; and any other information requested by the Exchange.\17\ The
proposed notice will continue to ensure the Exchange is
[[Page 22765]]
aware of all transfers so that it can monitor and review them
(including the records that must be retained pursuant to proposed
paragraph (e)) to determine whether they are effected in accordance
with the Rules. The proposed rule text requires additional information
with respect to the prior written notification that is required to
effect a transfer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ This notice provision applies only to transfers involving a
member's or member organization's positions and not to positions of
non-member and non-member organization parties, as they are not
subject to the Rules. In addition, no notice would be required to
effect transfers to correct bona fide errors pursuant to proposed
subparagraph (a)(1).
\17\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, requiring notice from the member or member
organization(s) and its Clearing Member(s) will ensure both parties are
in agreement with respect to the terms of the transfer. As noted in
proposed subparagraph (d)(2), receipt of notice of an transfer does not
constitute a determination by the Exchange that the transfer was
effected or reported in conformity with the requirements of proposed
Section 10(b). Notwithstanding submission of written notice to the
Exchange, member or member organizations and Clearing Members that
effect transfers that do not conform to the requirements of proposed
Section 10(b) will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action in
accordance with the Rules.
Records
Current Phlx Rule at Options 6, Section 5(c) provides, in part,
Each member or member organization that is a party to a transfer of
positions must make and retain records stating the nature of the
transaction, the name of the counter-party, and any other information
required by the Exchange. Proposed Options 6, Section 5(e) requires
each member or member organization and each Clearing Member that is a
party to a transfer must make and retain records of the information
provided in the written notice to the Exchange pursuant to proposed
subparagraph (e)(1), as well as information on the actual Exchange-
listed options that are ultimately transferred, the actual transfer
date, and the actual transfer price (and the original trade dates, if
applicable), and any other information the Exchange may request the
member or member organization or Clearing Member provide.\18\ The
records requirement is enhanced to require additional information that
must be maintained by members, member organizations and each Clearing
Member that is a party to a transfer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presidential Exemption
Proposed paragraph (f) provides exemptions approved by the
Exchange's Chief Executive Officer or President (or senior-level
designee). Specifically, this provision is in addition to the
exemptions set forth in proposed paragraph (a). The Exchange proposes
that the Exchange Chief Executive Officer or President (or senior-level
designee) may grant an exemption from the requirement of this proposed
Rule, on his or her own motion or upon application of the member or
member organization (with respect to the member's or member
organization's positions) or a Clearing Member (with respect to
positions carried and cleared by the Clearing Members). The Chief
Executive Officer, the President or his or her designee, may permit an
a transfer if necessary or appropriate for the maintenance of a fair
and orderly market and the protection of investors and is in the public
interest, including due to unusual or extraordinary circumstances. For
example, an exemption may be granted if the market value of the
Person's positions would be compromised by having to comply with the
requirement to trade on the Exchange pursuant to the normal auction
process or when, in the judgment of the Chief Executive Officer,
President or his or her designee, market conditions make trading on the
Exchange impractical.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Routine, Recurring Transfers
The Exchange proposes within Options 6, Section 5(g) that that the
transfer procedure set forth in Options 6, Section 5 is intended to
facilitate non-routine, nonrecurring movements of positions.\20\ The
transfer procedure is not to be used repeatedly or routinely in
circumvention of the normal auction market process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exchange-Listed Options
The Exchange proposes within Options 6, Section 5(h) notes that the
transfer procedure set forth in Options 6, Section 5 is only applicable
to positions in options listed on the Exchange. Transfers of positions
in Exchange-listed options may also be subject to applicable laws,
rules, and regulations, including rules of other self-regulatory
organizations. Transfers of non-Exchange listed options and other
financial instruments are not governed by this Rule.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updating Citations
The Exchange recently relocated its rules into a new Rulebook
Shell.\22\ Certain rule citations within General 2, Section 4; Options
2, Section 6; Options 7, Section 4; Options 8, Section 28; Section 39,
B-6 and C-2 were inadvertently not updated. The Exchange proposes to
update those citations and also remove an unnecessary header within
General 9, Section 58.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88213 (February 14,
2020), 85 FR 9859 (February 20, 2020) (SR-Phlx-2020-03) (``Phlx
Rulebook Relocation Rule Change'').
\23\ The header ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REGARDING RULE 605''
is unnecessary as the language which follows explains the text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\24\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\25\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed transfer rule is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \26\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \27\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that permitting the transfers in very limited
circumstances, such as where there is no change in beneficial
ownership, a transfer by operation of law or an adjustment or transfer
in connection with the correction of a bona fide error, is reasonable
to allow a member or member organization to accomplish certain goals
efficiently. The Exchange currently permits transfers in situations
involving dissolutions of entities or accounts, for purposes of
donations or mergers. For example, a member or member organization that
is undergoing a structural change and a one-time movement of positions
may require a
[[Page 22766]]
transfer of positions or a member or member organization that is
leaving a firm that will no longer be in business may require a
transfer of positions to another firm. Also, a member or member
organization may require a transfer of positions to make a capital
contribution. The above-referenced circumstances are non-recurring
situations where the transferor continues to maintain some ownership
interest or manage the positions transferred. By contrast, repeated or
routine transfers between entities or accounts--even if there is no
change in beneficial ownership as a result of the transfer--is
inconsistent with the purposes for which the proposed rule was adopted.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that such activity should not be
permitted under the rules and thus, seeks to adopt language in proposed
paragraph (f) to proposed Options 6, Section 5 that the transfer of
positions procedures set forth the proposed rule are intended to
facilitate non-recurring movements of positions.
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change benefits investors,
as it adds transparency to the Rules. The purpose of the additional
circumstances in which market participants may conduct transfers is
consistent with the purpose of the circumstances currently permitted in
the proposed rule. Therefore, the proposed rule change will provide
market participants that experience these limited, non-recurring events
with an efficient and effective means to transfer positions in these
situations. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change regarding
permissible transfer prices provides market participants with
flexibility to determine the price appropriate for their business,
which maintain cost bases in accordance with normal accounting
practices and removes impediments to a free and open market.
The proposed rule change which requires notice and maintenance of
records will ensure the Exchange is able to review transfers for
compliance with the Rules, which prevents fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices. The requirement to retain records is consistent
with the requirements of Rule 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the Act.
Similar to Cboe Rule 6.7, the Exchange would permit a presidential
exemption. The Exchange believes that this exemption is consistent with
the Act because the Exchange's Chief Executive Officer or President (or
senior-level designee) would consider an exemption in very limited
circumstances. The transfer process is intended to facilitate non-
routine, nonrecurring movements of positions and, therefore, is not to
be used repeatedly or routinely in circumvention of the normal auction
market process. Proposed Options 6, Section 5(f) specifically provides
within the rule text that the Exchange's Chief Executive Officer or
President (or senior-level designee) may in his or her judgment allow a
transfer if it is necessary or appropriate for the maintenance of a
fair and orderly market and the protection of investors and is in the
public interest, including due to unusual or extraordinary
circumstances such as the market value of the Person's positions will
be comprised by having to comply with the requirement to trade on the
Exchange pursuant to the normal auction process or, when in the
judgment of President or his or her designee, market conditions make
trading on the Exchange impractical. These standards within proposed
Options 6, Section 5(f) are intended to provide guidance concerning the
use of this exemption which is intended to provide the Exchange with
the ability to utilize the exemption for the maintenance of a fair and
orderly market and the protection of investors and is in the public
interest. The Exchange believes that the exemption is consistent with
the Act because it would allow the Exchange's Chief Executive Officer
or President (or senior-level designee) to act in certain situations
which comply with the guidance within Options 6, Section 5(f) which are
intended to protect investors and the general public. While Cboe grants
an exemption to the President (or senior-level designee),\28\ the
Exchange has elected to grant an exemption to Exchange's Chief
Executive Officer or President (or senior-level designee), who are
similarly situated with the organization as senior-level individuals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See Cboe Rule 6.7(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updating Citations
Updating rule citations and removing unnecessary text will bring
greater clarity to the Rulebook.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose
an undue burden on intra-market competition as the transfer procedure
may be utilized by any member or member organization and the rule will
apply uniformly to all members or member organizations. Use of the
transfer procedure is voluntary, and all members or member
organizations may use the procedure to transfer positions as long as
the criteria in the proposed rule are satisfied. With this change, a
member or member organization that experiences limited permissible,
non-recurring events would have an efficient and effective means to
transfer positions in these situations. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change regarding permissible transfer prices provides
market participants with flexibility to determine the price appropriate
for their business, which determine prices in accordance with normal
accounting practices and removes impediments to a free and open market.
The Exchange does not believe the proposed notice and record
requirements are unduly burdensome to market participants. The Exchange
believes the proposed requirements are reasonable and will ensure the
Exchange is aware of transfers and would be able to monitor and review
the transfers to ensure the transfer falls within the proposed rule.
Adopting an exemption, similar to Cboe Rule 6.7, to permit the
Exchange's Chief Executive Officer or President (or senior-level
designee) to grant an exemption to Options 6, Section 5(a) prohibition
if, in his or her judgment, does not impose an undue burden on
competition. Circumstances where, due to unusual or extraordinary
circumstances such as the market value of the Person's positions would
be comprised by having to comply with the requirement to trade on the
Exchange pursuant to the normal auction process or, would be taken into
consideration in each case where, in the judgment of the Exchange's
Chief Executive Officer or President (or senior-level designee), market
conditions make trading on the Exchange impractical.
The Exchange does not believe the proposed rule change will impose
an undue burden on inter-market competition. The proposed position
transfer procedure is not intended to be a competitive trading tool.
The proposed rule change permits, in limited circumstances, a transfer
to facilitate non-routine, nonrecurring movements of positions. As
provided for in proposed Options 6, Section 5(g), it would not be used
repeatedly or routinely in circumvention of the normal auction market
process. Proposed Options 6, Section 5(a) specifically provides within
the rule text that the Exchange's Chief Executive Officer or President
(or senior-level designee) may in his or her judgment allow a transfer
for the maintenance of
[[Page 22767]]
a fair and orderly market and the protection of investors and is in the
public interest. The Exchange believes that the exemption does not
impose an undue burden on competition as the Exchange's Chief Executive
Officer or President (or senior-level designee) would apply the
exemption consistent with the guidance within Options 6, Section 5(f).
Additionally, as discussed above, the proposed rule change is similar
to Cboe Rule 6.7. The Exchange believes having similar rules related to
transfer positions to those of other options exchanges will reduce the
administrative burden on market participants of determining whether
their transfers comply with multiple sets of rules.
Updating Citations
The updates to the rule citations and removal of unnecessary rule
text are non-substantive rule changes.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \29\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\30\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing. However, Rule
19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \31\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the
30-day operative delay. The Commission notes that waiver of the
operative delay would provide members with the ability to request a
transfer, for limited, non-recurring types of transfers, without the
need for exposing those orders on the Exchange, similar to Cboe.\32\
The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Accordingly, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\32\ See CBOE Rule 6.7.
\33\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2020-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2020-22. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2020-22 and should be submitted on
or before May 14, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-08591 Filed 4-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P