Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018, 21826-21827 [2020-08299]
Download as PDF
21826
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 76 / Monday, April 20, 2020 / Notices
investigation.7 Additionally, in
accordance with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s
decision in Albemarle Corp. v. United
States,8 we are applying to the nonselected companies a rate based on the
simple average of the individual rates
applied to ASFO and Forgital in this
administrative review.9 This is the only
rate determined in this review for
individual respondents and, thus,
should be applied to the 25 non-selected
companies under section 735(c)(5)(B) of
the Act. For a detailed discussion, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
As a result of this review, Commerce
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the
POR:
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer/exporter
ASFO S.p.A ...........................................
Forgital Italy S.p.A .................................
ASFO S.p.A.—FOMAS Group ..............
Assotherm srl ........................................
Bifrangi S.p.A ........................................
CAT Carpenteria Metallica srl ...............
Costruzione Ricambi Machine
Industriali ...........................................
Filmag Italia S.r.l ...................................
FOC Ciscato S.p.Ar ..............................
FOMAS ..................................................
Forgia Di Bollate S.p.A .........................
Forgiatura A. Vienna diAntonio Vienna
Franchini Acciai S.p.A ...........................
Galperti Forged Products ......................
Inox Laghi S.r.l ......................................
KIASMA SRL .........................................
Iml Industria Meccanica Ligure .............
Martin Valmore srl .................................
M.E.G.A. S.p.A ......................................
Metalfar Prodotti Industriali, S.p.A ........
Officine Ambrogio Melesi & C. S.R.L ....
Officine di Cortabbio s.r.l .......................
OFFICINE MECCANICHE CIOCCA
S.p.A ..................................................
Office SANTAFEDE ..............................
Siderforgerossi Group S.p.A .................
UNIGEN Steel Engineering ...................
VALVITALIA S.p.A ................................
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
204.53
Assessment Rates
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protections (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with these
7 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges from India
and Italy: Antidumping Duty Orders, 82 FR 40136
(August 24, 2017) (Order).
8 See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d
1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
9 See, e.g., Certain Small Diameter Carbon and
Alloy Seamless Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe
(Under 4\1/2\ Inches) from Japan: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2015,
81 FR 80640, 80641 (November 16, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Apr 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
final results of review.10 Thus, we will
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem
assessment rate of 204.53 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during
the period of review which were
produced and/or exported by ASFO,
Forgital and the aforementioned
companies which were not selected for
individual examination. We intend to
issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15
days after publication of the final results
of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for ASFO, Forgital and
the other companies listed above will be
equal to the weighted-average dumping
margin established in the final results of
this administrative review; (2) for
previously reviewed or investigated
companies not listed above, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or in the original investigation,
but the producer is, then the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established
for the most recently completed segment
of this proceeding for the producer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be the allothers rate of 79.17 percent, the rate
established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation.11 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1) and section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
11 See Order, 82 FR at 40138.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: April 14, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
1. Whether To Continue To Apply Total
Adverse Facts Available to Forgital
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–08301 Filed 4–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–549–820]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand From Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) has completed its
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on prestressed
concrete steel wire strand (PC strand)
from Thailand for the period of review
(POR) January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018. We continue to find
that that The Siam Industrial Wire Co.,
Ltd. (SIW) did not make sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
(NV) during the POR.
DATES: Applicable April 20, 2020.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 76 / Monday, April 20, 2020 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: 202–482–1766 or
202–482–2285, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 5, 2020, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results in the
Federal Register.1 We invited interested
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. No interested parties submitted
comments or a request for a hearing.
Commerce conducted this review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
Order 2 is prestressed concrete steel wire
strand produced from wire of nonstainless, non-galvanized steel, which is
suitable for use in prestressed concrete
(both pre-tensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition
encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and
diameters of PC strand. The
merchandise subject to the Order is
currently classifiable under subheadings
7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
subject to the scope is dispositive.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
As no parties submitted comments on
the margin calculation methodology
used in the Preliminary Results,
Commerce made no adjustments to that
methodology in the final results of this
review.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of the Review
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
determined that SIW did not make sales
of subject merchandise at less than NV
during the POR. As we have not
1 See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from
Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018, 85 FR 6501 (February
5, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
from Thailand, 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004)
(Order); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from Brazil, India, Japan, the Republic of
Korea, Mexico, and Thailand: Continuation of the
Antidumping Duty Finding/Orders and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 22708 (April 23,
2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:34 Apr 17, 2020
Jkt 250001
received any information to contradict
our preliminary finding, we continue to
determine in the final results that SIW
did not make sales of subject
merchandise at less than NV during the
POR. Accordingly, Commerce
determines that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
for entries of subject merchandise that
were produced and/or exported by SIW.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce
has determined, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with these final results of
administrative review. Because we
calculated a zero margin for SIW in the
final results of this review, we intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from
Thailand entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date, as provided by
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for SIW will be equal
to zero; (2) for previously investigated
companies not covered in this review
but covered in a completed prior
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company was
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, a previous
review, or the original investigation, but
the producer is, then the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding for the producer of subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 12.91 percent, the
all-others rate established in the
investigation.3 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
3 See
PO 00000
Order, 69 FR at 4111.
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21827
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: April 7, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–08299 Filed 4–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–867]
Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017–2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Hyosung
Heavy Industries Corporation (Hyosung)
and Hyundai Electric & Energy Systems
Co. (Hyundai) made sales of large power
transformers from the Republic of Korea
(Korea) at less than normal value during
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 76 (Monday, April 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21826-21827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08299]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-549-820]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From Thailand: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has completed its
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on prestressed
concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from Thailand for the period of
review (POR) January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. We continue to
find that that The Siam Industrial Wire Co., Ltd. (SIW) did not make
sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value (NV) during the
POR.
DATES: Applicable April 20, 2020.
[[Page 21827]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Smith or Samantha Kinney, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1766 or 202-482-
2285, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 5, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results in
the Federal Register.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on
the Preliminary Results. No interested parties submitted comments or a
request for a hearing. Commerce conducted this review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from Thailand:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018,
85 FR 6501 (February 5, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this Order \2\ is prestressed concrete
steel wire strand produced from wire of non-stainless, non-galvanized
steel, which is suitable for use in prestressed concrete (both pre-
tensioned and post-tensioned) applications. The product definition
encompasses covered and uncovered strand and all types, grades, and
diameters of PC strand. The merchandise subject to the Order is
currently classifiable under subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the
scope is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete
Steel Wire Strand from Thailand, 69 FR 4111 (January 28, 2004)
(Order); see also Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from
Brazil, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, and Thailand:
Continuation of the Antidumping Duty Finding/Orders and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 22708 (April 23, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
As no parties submitted comments on the margin calculation
methodology used in the Preliminary Results, Commerce made no
adjustments to that methodology in the final results of this review.
Final Results of the Review
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that SIW did not
make sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR. As we
have not received any information to contradict our preliminary
finding, we continue to determine in the final results that SIW did not
make sales of subject merchandise at less than NV during the POR.
Accordingly, Commerce determines that a weighted-average dumping margin
of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject merchandise that were
produced and/or exported by SIW.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b),
Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with these final results of administrative
review. Because we calculated a zero margin for SIW in the final
results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these final results of administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from Thailand entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for SIW will be equal to zero; (2) for previously
investigated companies not covered in this review but covered in a
completed prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
previous review, or the original investigation, but the producer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 12.91 percent, the all-
others rate established in the investigation.\3\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Order, 69 FR at 4111.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: April 7, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-08299 Filed 4-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P