Certain Multi-Stage Fuel Vapor Canister Systems and Activated Carbon Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part, Take No Position on the Issues Under Review, and Affirm in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation, 20299-20300 [2020-07589]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 70 / Friday, April 10, 2020 / Notices
(NC 12) and within adjacent
communities.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the EIS is to develop
a streamlined framework for
implementing sediment management at
the Seashore, including the method,
location, and frequency for sediment
management actions that may be
permitted. We have received various
requests and anticipate future requests
to issue special use permits for
protecting roads, bridges, electrical
transmission facilities, and other public
transportation facilities; repairing island
damages, including breaches that also
affect transportation; and restoring
habitat through the placement of
dredged materials along eroded sections
of barrier islands. A sediment
management framework is needed to
assist the Seashore in addressing these
requests, while avoiding and
minimizing impacts that may be
associated with such actions conducted
by NPS and other agencies to mitigate
shoreline erosion. The framework is
needed to limit impacts to the Seashore
and provide timely response for
localized beach nourishment efforts in
the face of increased storm events and
projected sea-level rise. Similarly,
sediment management strategies may be
used for specific habitat restoration
projects.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Alternatives
The NPS will evaluate alternative
approaches for sediment management at
the Seashore. The NPS is considering
the following alternatives.
Under Alternative A, the no-action
alternative, the NPS would not permit
others to conduct sediment management
activities at the Seashore over the next
two decades. No habitat restoration
projects that include the placement of
sediment would occur. The NCDOT
currently maintains an easement
through the Seashore for NC 12. The noaction alternative would preclude
NCDOT from maintaining NC 12 outside
of its existing easement, potentially
resulting in the loss of the highway.
Under Alternative B, the proposed
action, the NPS could permit other
agencies and municipalities to conduct,
with conditions, sediment management
in the form of ocean- and sound sidebeach nourishment, filling island
breaches, and dune restoration. This
alternative would also recognize that
NPS and others may independently or
in partnership restore beach habitats or
periodically protect specific facilities or
resources through sediment placement
in areas that have been affected by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Apr 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
erosion. The proposed action includes
the following elements:
• Beach nourishment may be used to
mitigate coastal erosion at various sites
along the Seashore, including ocean and
sound-side environments. Beach
nourishment may occur at up to two
locations per year, using between 50–
250 cubic yards of sediment per foot,
placed via dredge or sediment trucking.
Sediment management permitted under
the proposed action would fall within
the general parameters of past beach
nourishment projects.
• The restoration of habitat may occur
in locations such as the southern end of
Hatteras Island and Green Island in
Oregon Inlet. Restored habitat could
benefit nesting shorebirds and sea
turtles. Habitat restoration projects
would include the application of dredge
material and moving/manipulating sand
at the site with heavy machinery.
Dredge material may come from the
pipeline dredging operations or other
sources, provided the sediment is a
close match to the sediment grain size
found at the proposed action site.
• Dune reconstruction and
enhancement, as well as moving or
regrading sediment to protect existing
access and public facilities, may occur.
Actions that promote natural dune
building processes, such as beach grass
planting and sand fencing, are included
in the proposed action and may be
carried out
• Emergency breach fill may occur
under the proposed action. When inlets,
overwash areas, or damaged roadways
are caused by wave, water, and wind
action during storm events, they may be
closed due to roadway reconstruction
activities. These projects may include
trucking, staging, and pumping
sediment in from other locations.
The NPS will not select an alternative
for implementation until after the final
EIS is completed. The NPS will analyze
the impacts of the alternatives on littoral
processes and barrier island
morphology, benthic organisms and
essential fish habitat, sea turtles,
shorebirds, and structures and
infrastructure. Additional alternatives
may be considered during the process of
preparing an EIS.
Public Comment
How to Provide Comments—During
the scoping period, project information
will be available on the project’s website
at https://parkplanning.nps.gov/
CAHASediment. Public open houses
will be conducted to provide an
opportunity for the public to share their
comments and learn more about
activities at the Seashore. Details
regarding the exact times and locations
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20299
of these meetings will be announced on
the project website and through local
and regional media. The meetings will
also be announced through email
notification, press release, and social
media to individuals and organizations.
If you wish to comment on the
purpose, need, preliminary alternatives,
additional alternatives, or on any other
issues associated with development of
the framework and EIS, you may submit
your comments by any one of several
methods. The preferred method for
commenting is online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/CAHASediment.
You may mail or hand deliver
comments to the Superintendent, Cape
Hatteras National Seashore, 1401
National Park Drive, Manteo, North
Carolina, 27954. Written comments will
also be accepted at the public open
houses. Comments will not be accepted
by fax, email, or by any method other
than those specified above. Bulk
comments in any format (hard copy or
electronic) submitted on behalf of others
will not be accepted.
Public Availability of Comments—
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7.
Robert A. Vogel,
Regional Director, Interior Region 2, South
Atlantic-Gulf.
[FR Doc. 2020–07426 Filed 4–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–52–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1140]
Certain Multi-Stage Fuel Vapor
Canister Systems and Activated
Carbon Components Thereof;
Commission Determination To Review
in Part, Take No Position on the Issues
Under Review, and Affirm in Part a
Final Initial Determination Finding No
Violation of Section 337; Termination
of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
20300
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 70 / Friday, April 10, 2020 / Notices
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined to review in part the final
initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) on January 28, 2020, finding no
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘section 337’’), in
connection with the asserted patent.
The Commission has determined to take
no position on the issues under review.
The Commission has also determined to
affirm the ID’s findings that the asserted
patent claims are invalid. This
investigation is terminated with a
finding of no violation of section 337.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
Traud, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20436, telephone 202–205–3427. Copies
of non-confidential documents filed in
connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS,
please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at https://
www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal, telephone 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on December 14, 2018, based on a
complaint filed by Ingevity Corp. and
Ingevity South Carolina, LLC, both of
North Charleston, South Carolina
(together, ‘‘Ingevity’’). 83 FR 64356. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleged
violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain multi-stage fuel vapor canister
systems and activated carbon
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. RE38,844 (‘‘the ’844 patent’’).
Id. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
MAHLE Filter Systems North America,
Inc. of Murfreesboro, Tennessee;
MAHLE Filter Systems Japan Corp. of
Saitama, Japan; MAHLE Sistemas de
Filtracion de Mexico de C.V. of
Monterrey, Mexico; MAHLE Filter
Systems Canada, ULC of Tilbury,
Canada (altogether, ‘‘MAHLE’’); Kuraray
Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan (‘‘Kuraray’’);
Kuraray America, Inc. of Houston,
Texas; and Nagamine Manufacture Co.,
Ltd. of Manno, Japan (‘‘Nagamine’’). Id.
The Commission subsequently amended
the complaint and notice of
investigation to add Calgon Carbon
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Apr 09, 2020
Jkt 250001
Corporation (‘‘Calgon’’) as a respondent
and to remove Kuraray America, Inc. as
a respondent. 84 FR 11555 (Mar. 27,
2019). The remaining respondents are
collectively referred to herein as
‘‘Respondents.’’ The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations is not
participating in this investigation. 83 FR
64356.
On January 28, 2020, the ALJ issued
the final ID, which finds that
Respondents did not violate section 337.
More particularly, the final ID found,
inter alia: (1) Ingevity, its customers,
and operators of the domestic industry
articles have been shown to practice the
asserted claims of the ’844 patent; (2)
the domestic industry requirement is
satisfied with respect to the ’844 patent;
(3) Respondent MAHLE directly and/or
indirectly infringes the asserted claims
of the ’844 patent; (4) Respondents
Kuraray and Nagamine indirectly
infringe the asserted claims; (5) the
asserted claims of the ’844 patent have
been shown to be invalid under 35
U.S.C. 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. 103 over the
Delphi prior invention, or the
combination of the Delphi prior
invention with other references; (6) the
asserted claims of the ’844 patent have
been shown to be invalid under 35
U.S.C. 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. 103 over
Meiller and/or Park and other
references; (7) independent claim 18 of
the ’844 patent, and those depending
therefrom, have been shown to be
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for
indefiniteness, but independent claims
1, 31, and 43, and those depending
therefrom, have not been shown to be
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for
indefiniteness; and (8) patent
exhaustion does not bar Ingevity’s
sought relief.
On February 10, 2020, the private
parties filed petitions for review of the
final ID, and on February 18, 2020, the
private parties filed responses.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, including the final ID, the
petitions for review, and the responses
thereto, the Commission has determined
to review the final ID in part. In
particular, the Commission has
determined to review the following
issues:
(1) Whether the asserted claims are
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Meiller
and/or Park and other references.
(2) Whether the asserted claims are
invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for
indefiniteness related to the claim terms
identified by the parties as the Volume
Terms, including the final ID’s
discussion of the scope of the Volume
Terms.
(3) Whether the accused products
infringe the asserted claims of the ’844
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
patent, and whether Respondents
indirectly infringe the asserted claims of
the ’844 patent.
(4) Whether Ingevity’s sale of its HCA
carbons to MAHLE that are later
incorporated into a subset of Accused
Canisters that also contain BAX carbons
exhausts Ingevity’s patent rights as to
those Accused Canisters.
(5) Whether Ingevity satisfied the
domestic industry requirement of
section 337.
(6) Whether Ingevity demonstrated
satisfaction of the importation
requirement of section 337, as set forth
in the final ID beginning on page 34
through the carryover paragraph on page
35.
(7) Whether Ingevity illegally tied the
sales of its products to allowing its
customers to practice the ’844 patent.
The Commission has determined to
not review the remainder of the final ID.
The Commission has determined to
take no position on the issues under
review. Accordingly, this investigation
is terminated with a finding of no
violation of section 337 based on the
unreviewed findings of the final ID that
the asserted claims have been shown to
be invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102 and/or
35 U.S.C. 103 over the Delphi prior
invention, or the combination of the
Delphi prior invention with other
references. This investigation is hereby
terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 7, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–07589 Filed 4–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Amended Receipt of
Complaint; Solicitation of Comments
Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received an amended
complaint entitled Certain Spa Pumps,
Jet Pump Housings, Pedicure Spas,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same, DN 3432; the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 70 (Friday, April 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20299-20300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07589]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1140]
Certain Multi-Stage Fuel Vapor Canister Systems and Activated
Carbon Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part,
Take No Position on the Issues Under Review, and Affirm in Part a Final
Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination
of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
[[Page 20300]]
Commission (``Commission'') has determined to review in part the final
initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative
law judge (``ALJ'') on January 28, 2020, finding no violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``section 337''), in
connection with the asserted patent. The Commission has determined to
take no position on the issues under review. The Commission has also
determined to affirm the ID's findings that the asserted patent claims
are invalid. This investigation is terminated with a finding of no
violation of section 337.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Traud, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3427. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone 202-205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on December 14, 2018, based on a complaint filed by Ingevity Corp. and
Ingevity South Carolina, LLC, both of North Charleston, South Carolina
(together, ``Ingevity''). 83 FR 64356. The complaint, as supplemented,
alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain multi-stage fuel vapor canister systems
and activated carbon components thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. RE38,844 (``the '844 patent''). Id.
The Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents MAHLE
Filter Systems North America, Inc. of Murfreesboro, Tennessee; MAHLE
Filter Systems Japan Corp. of Saitama, Japan; MAHLE Sistemas de
Filtracion de Mexico de C.V. of Monterrey, Mexico; MAHLE Filter Systems
Canada, ULC of Tilbury, Canada (altogether, ``MAHLE''); Kuraray Co.,
Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan (``Kuraray''); Kuraray America, Inc. of Houston,
Texas; and Nagamine Manufacture Co., Ltd. of Manno, Japan
(``Nagamine''). Id. The Commission subsequently amended the complaint
and notice of investigation to add Calgon Carbon Corporation
(``Calgon'') as a respondent and to remove Kuraray America, Inc. as a
respondent. 84 FR 11555 (Mar. 27, 2019). The remaining respondents are
collectively referred to herein as ``Respondents.'' The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in this
investigation. 83 FR 64356.
On January 28, 2020, the ALJ issued the final ID, which finds that
Respondents did not violate section 337. More particularly, the final
ID found, inter alia: (1) Ingevity, its customers, and operators of the
domestic industry articles have been shown to practice the asserted
claims of the '844 patent; (2) the domestic industry requirement is
satisfied with respect to the '844 patent; (3) Respondent MAHLE
directly and/or indirectly infringes the asserted claims of the '844
patent; (4) Respondents Kuraray and Nagamine indirectly infringe the
asserted claims; (5) the asserted claims of the '844 patent have been
shown to be invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. 103 over the
Delphi prior invention, or the combination of the Delphi prior
invention with other references; (6) the asserted claims of the '844
patent have been shown to be invalid under 35 U.S.C. 102 and/or 35
U.S.C. 103 over Meiller and/or Park and other references; (7)
independent claim 18 of the '844 patent, and those depending therefrom,
have been shown to be invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for indefiniteness,
but independent claims 1, 31, and 43, and those depending therefrom,
have not been shown to be invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for
indefiniteness; and (8) patent exhaustion does not bar Ingevity's
sought relief.
On February 10, 2020, the private parties filed petitions for
review of the final ID, and on February 18, 2020, the private parties
filed responses.
Having examined the record in this investigation, including the
final ID, the petitions for review, and the responses thereto, the
Commission has determined to review the final ID in part. In
particular, the Commission has determined to review the following
issues:
(1) Whether the asserted claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 103
over Meiller and/or Park and other references.
(2) Whether the asserted claims are invalid under 35 U.S.C. 112 for
indefiniteness related to the claim terms identified by the parties as
the Volume Terms, including the final ID's discussion of the scope of
the Volume Terms.
(3) Whether the accused products infringe the asserted claims of
the '844 patent, and whether Respondents indirectly infringe the
asserted claims of the '844 patent.
(4) Whether Ingevity's sale of its HCA carbons to MAHLE that are
later incorporated into a subset of Accused Canisters that also contain
BAX carbons exhausts Ingevity's patent rights as to those Accused
Canisters.
(5) Whether Ingevity satisfied the domestic industry requirement of
section 337.
(6) Whether Ingevity demonstrated satisfaction of the importation
requirement of section 337, as set forth in the final ID beginning on
page 34 through the carryover paragraph on page 35.
(7) Whether Ingevity illegally tied the sales of its products to
allowing its customers to practice the '844 patent.
The Commission has determined to not review the remainder of the
final ID.
The Commission has determined to take no position on the issues
under review. Accordingly, this investigation is terminated with a
finding of no violation of section 337 based on the unreviewed findings
of the final ID that the asserted claims have been shown to be invalid
under 35 U.S.C. 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. 103 over the Delphi prior
invention, or the combination of the Delphi prior invention with other
references. This investigation is hereby terminated.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 7, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-07589 Filed 4-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P