Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 19729-19730 [2020-07379]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Notices
Dated: April 1, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
26. Justhere Co., Ltd.
27. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co.,
Ltd
28. Kromet International
29. Kromet International Inc.
30. Kromet Intl Inc
31. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd.
32. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd.
33. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd.
34. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd.
35. PanAsia Aluminum (China) Limited
36. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited
37. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd.
38. Popular Plastics Company Limited
39. Precision Metal Works Ltd.
40. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
41. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum
Alloy Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
42. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd.
43. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co.
Ltd.
44. Summit Heat Sinks Metal Co, Ltd
45. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
46. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp.,
Ltd.
47. Tianjin Ruxin Electric Heat Transmission
Technology Co., Ltd.
48. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd.
49. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd.
50. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
51. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum
Industry Co., Ltd.
52. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminum
Factory Ltd.
Appendix
[FR Doc. 2020–07378 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am]
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order (APO)
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to APO of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation. Note that
Commerce has temporarily modified
certain of its requirements for serving
documents containing business
proprietary information, until May 19,
2020, unless extended.8
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a) and
777(i)(1) of the Act.
List of Companies Failing To Demonstrate
Eligibility for a Separate Rate
1. Activa Leisure Inc.
2. Allied Maker Limited
3. Birchwoods (Lin’an) Leisure Products Co.,
Ltd.
4. Changzhou Changzhen Evaporator Co.,
Ltd.
5. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co.,
Ltd.
6. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd.
7. Cosco (JM) Aluminum Development Co.,
Ltd.
8. Dynabright International Group (HK) Ltd.
9. Dynamic Technologies China
10. ETLA Technology (Wuxi) Co. Ltd
11. First Union Property Limited
12. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd.
13. Foshan JinLan Aluminum Co., Ltd.
14. Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminum Co.,
Ltd.
15. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd.
16. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory
Co., Ltd.
17. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminum Co., Ltd.
18. Hanwood Enterprises Limited
19. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
20. Honsense Development Company
21. Innovative Aluminum (Hong Kong)
Limited
22. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co.
23. Jiangyin Trust International Inc.
24. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows
Co., Ltd.
25. JMA (HK) Company Limited
8 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006
(March 26, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Apr 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2017–
2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Pidilite
Industries Limited (Pidilite), a
producer/exporter of carbazole violet
pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not
sell subject merchandise at prices below
normal value (NV) during the period of
review (POR) December 1, 2017 through
November 30, 2018.
DATES: Applicable April 8, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19729
Background
On January 30, 2020, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from
India.1 This review covers one
producer/exporter of the subject
merchandise, Pidilite. We invited
parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results.2 No interested party submitted
comments or a request for a hearing.
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the
Order 3 is CVP–23 identified as Color
Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract
No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name
of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′m] 4 triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,
15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular
formula of C34 H22 Cl2 N4 O2. The
subject merchandise includes the crude
pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder,
paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in
the form of presscake and dry color.
Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g.,
pigments dispersed in oleoresins,
flammable solvents, water) are not
included within the scope of the Order.
The merchandise subject to the Order
is classifiable under subheading
3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Although the HTSUS subheading is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, our written description of the
scope of the Order is dispositive.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
As no parties submitted comments on
the margin calculation methodology
used in the Preliminary Results,
Commerce made no adjustments to that
methodology in the final results of this
review.
1 See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 5394
(January 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 Id.
3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from
India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order).
4 The bracketed section of the product
description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business
proprietary information. In this case, the brackets
are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See
‘‘Amendment to Petition for Antidumping
Investigations of China and India and a
Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on
Imports of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms
of Crude Pigment, Presscake and Dry Color
Pigment,’’ dated December 3, 2003, at 8.
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
19730
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Notices
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, Commerce
determines that a weighted-average
dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists
for entries of subject merchandise that
were produced and/or exported by
Pidilite during the POR.
Assessment Rates
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject
merchandise in accordance with the
final results of this review, pursuant to
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.212(b). Because we calculated
a zero margin for Pidilite in the final
results of this review, we intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
Commerce intends to issue the
appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of these final results of
review.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of these final results for all
shipments of CVP 23 from India
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for Pidilite will be zero; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a completed prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is,
then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently
completed segment for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 27.48
percent, the all-others rate established
in the Order. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in Commerce’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Apr 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties has occurred and
the subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under the APO,
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: April 2, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–07379 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) has received requests to
conduct administrative reviews of
various antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD) orders and
findings with February anniversary
dates. In accordance with Commerce’s
regulations, we are initiating those
administrative reviews.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applicable April 8, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations,
Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone:
(202) 482–4735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
Commerce has received timely
requests, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), for administrative reviews of
various AD and CVD orders and
findings with February anniversary
dates.
All deadlines for the submission of
various types of information,
certifications, or comments or actions by
Commerce discussed below refer to the
number of calendar days from the
applicable starting time.
Notice of No Sales
If a producer or exporter named in
this notice of initiation had no exports,
sales, or entries during the period of
review (POR), it must notify Commerce
within 30 days of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. All
submissions must be filed electronically
at https://access.trade.gov in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such
submissions are subject to verification
in accordance with section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served
on every party on Commerce’s service
list.
Respondent Selection
In the event Commerce limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below, Commerce
intends to select respondents based on
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) data for U.S. imports during the
POR. We intend to place the CBP data
on the record within five days of
publication of the initiation notice and
to make our decision regarding
respondent selection within 30 days of
publication of the initiation Federal
Register notice. Comments regarding the
CBP data and respondent selection
should be submitted within seven days
after the placement of the CBP data on
the record of this review. Parties
wishing to submit rebuttal comments
should submit those comments within
five days after the deadline for the
initial comments.
In the event Commerce decides it is
necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the
following guidelines regarding
collapsing of companies for purposes of
respondent selection will apply. In
1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19729-19730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Pidilite
Industries Limited (Pidilite), a producer/exporter of carbazole violet
pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not sell subject merchandise at
prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR)
December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018.
DATES: Applicable April 8, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2623.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 30, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on CVP 23 from India.\1\ This review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise, Pidilite. We invited parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results.\2\ No interested party submitted
comments or a request for a hearing. Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 85 FR
5394 (January 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the Order \3\ is CVP-23 identified as
Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-1, with the
chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] \4\ triphenodioxazine, 8,18-
dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34 H22
Cl2 N4 O2. The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any
form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the
form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g.,
pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not
included within the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment
23 from India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order).
\4\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business proprietary information. In this case,
the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See
``Amendment to Petition for Antidumping Investigations of China and
India and a Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on Imports of
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms of Crude Pigment, Presscake
and Dry Color Pigment,'' dated December 3, 2003, at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under
subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope
of the Order is dispositive.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
As no parties submitted comments on the margin calculation
methodology used in the Preliminary Results, Commerce made no
adjustments to that methodology in the final results of this review.
[[Page 19730]]
Final Results of the Review
As a result of this review, Commerce determines that a weighted-
average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject
merchandise that were produced and/or exported by Pidilite during the
POR.
Assessment Rates
Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this
review, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b). Because we calculated a zero margin for Pidilite in the
final results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate
the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
Commerce intends to issue the appropriate assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of
CVP 23 from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption
on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Pidilite will be zero; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 27.48 percent, the
all-others rate established in the Order. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement
of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as
a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO)
of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under the APO, which continues to
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
351.221(b)(5).
Dated: April 2, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-07379 Filed 4-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P