Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 19729-19730 [2020-07379]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Notices Dated: April 1, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 26. Justhere Co., Ltd. 27. Kanal Precision Aluminum Product Co., Ltd 28. Kromet International 29. Kromet International Inc. 30. Kromet Intl Inc 31. Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd. 32. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd. 33. Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd. 34. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd. 35. PanAsia Aluminum (China) Limited 36. Pingguo Aluminum Company Limited 37. Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd. 38. Popular Plastics Company Limited 39. Precision Metal Works Ltd. 40. Shangdong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd. 41. Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 42. Shenzhen Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. 43. Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. 44. Summit Heat Sinks Metal Co, Ltd 45. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 46. Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd. 47. Tianjin Ruxin Electric Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd. 48. Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd. 49. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd. 50. Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd. 51. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. 52. Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminum Factory Ltd. Appendix [FR Doc. 2020–07378 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am] Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO) This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Note that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving documents containing business proprietary information, until May 19, 2020, unless extended.8 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. List of Companies Failing To Demonstrate Eligibility for a Separate Rate 1. Activa Leisure Inc. 2. Allied Maker Limited 3. Birchwoods (Lin’an) Leisure Products Co., Ltd. 4. Changzhou Changzhen Evaporator Co., Ltd. 5. Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd. 6. Cosco (J.M.) Aluminum Co., Ltd. 7. Cosco (JM) Aluminum Development Co., Ltd. 8. Dynabright International Group (HK) Ltd. 9. Dynamic Technologies China 10. ETLA Technology (Wuxi) Co. Ltd 11. First Union Property Limited 12. Foshan Jinlan Aluminum Co. Ltd. 13. Foshan JinLan Aluminum Co., Ltd. 14. Foshan Shanshui Fenglu Aluminum Co., Ltd. 15. Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminum Co., Ltd. 16. Guangdong Weiye Aluminum Factory Co., Ltd. 17. Guangdong Xingfa Aluminum Co., Ltd. 18. Hanwood Enterprises Limited 19. Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 20. Honsense Development Company 21. Innovative Aluminum (Hong Kong) Limited 22. Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co. 23. Jiangyin Trust International Inc. 24. Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd. 25. JMA (HK) Company Limited 8 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:37 Apr 07, 2020 Jkt 250001 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–838] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite), a producer/exporter of carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not sell subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018. DATES: Applicable April 8, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2623. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19729 Background On January 30, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from India.1 This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, Pidilite. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.2 No interested party submitted comments or a request for a hearing. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order 3 is CVP–23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′m] 4 triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34 H22 Cl2 N4 O2. The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the scope of the Order. The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the Order is dispositive. Changes Since the Preliminary Results As no parties submitted comments on the margin calculation methodology used in the Preliminary Results, Commerce made no adjustments to that methodology in the final results of this review. 1 See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 5394 (January 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 Id. 3 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order). 4 The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business proprietary information. In this case, the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See ‘‘Amendment to Petition for Antidumping Investigations of China and India and a Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on Imports of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms of Crude Pigment, Presscake and Dry Color Pigment,’’ dated December 3, 2003, at 8. E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1 19730 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 68 / Wednesday, April 8, 2020 / Notices Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, Commerce determines that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or exported by Pidilite during the POR. Assessment Rates Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). Because we calculated a zero margin for Pidilite in the final results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce intends to issue the appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of CVP 23 from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Pidilite will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 27.48 percent, the all-others rate established in the Order. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:37 Apr 07, 2020 Jkt 250001 presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under the APO, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5). Dated: April 2, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–07379 Filed 4–7–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders and findings with February anniversary dates. In accordance with Commerce’s regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews. SUMMARY: DATES: Applicable April 8, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Background Commerce has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various AD and CVD orders and findings with February anniversary dates. All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, certifications, or comments or actions by Commerce discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting time. Notice of No Sales If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (POR), it must notify Commerce within 30 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically at https://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1 Such submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served on every party on Commerce’s service list. Respondent Selection In the event Commerce limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, Commerce intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the POR. We intend to place the CBP data on the record within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 30 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection should be submitted within seven days after the placement of the CBP data on the record of this review. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal comments should submit those comments within five days after the deadline for the initial comments. In the event Commerce decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act, the following guidelines regarding collapsing of companies for purposes of respondent selection will apply. In 1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM 08APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 68 (Wednesday, April 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19729-19730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07379]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-838]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Pidilite 
Industries Limited (Pidilite), a producer/exporter of carbazole violet 
pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not sell subject merchandise at 
prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) 
December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018.

DATES: Applicable April 8, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2623.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On January 30, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on CVP 23 from India.\1\ This review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise, Pidilite. We invited parties to 
comment on the Preliminary Results.\2\ No interested party submitted 
comments or a request for a hearing. Commerce conducted this 
administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff 
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 85 FR 
5394 (January 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the Order \3\ is CVP-23 identified as 
Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-1, with the 
chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] \4\ triphenodioxazine, 8,18-
dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34 H22 
Cl2 N4 O2. The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any 
form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the 
form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., 
pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not 
included within the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 
23 from India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order).
    \4\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business proprietary information. In this case, 
the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See 
``Amendment to Petition for Antidumping Investigations of China and 
India and a Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on Imports of 
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms of Crude Pigment, Presscake 
and Dry Color Pigment,'' dated December 3, 2003, at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The merchandise subject to the Order is classifiable under 
subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope 
of the Order is dispositive.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    As no parties submitted comments on the margin calculation 
methodology used in the Preliminary Results, Commerce made no 
adjustments to that methodology in the final results of this review.

[[Page 19730]]

Final Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, Commerce determines that a weighted-
average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject 
merchandise that were produced and/or exported by Pidilite during the 
POR.

Assessment Rates

    Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of 
subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this 
review, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b). Because we calculated a zero margin for Pidilite in the 
final results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 
the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    Commerce intends to issue the appropriate assessment instructions 
to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of 
review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of 
CVP 23 from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption 
on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of 
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Pidilite will be zero; (2) for 
merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original 
investigation but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will 
be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the 
manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all 
other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 27.48 percent, the 
all-others rate established in the Order. These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent assessment of 
double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice also serves as 
a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) 
of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under the APO, which continues to 
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 
351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: April 2, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-07379 Filed 4-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P