Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 19434-19436 [2020-07312]

Download as PDF 19434 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices containing business proprietary information, until May 19, 2020, unless extended.19 Dated: March 30, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Appendix I—Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by this investigation is ceramic flooring tile, wall tile, paving tile, hearth tile, porcelain tile, mosaic tile, flags, finishing tile, and the like (hereinafter ceramic tile). Ceramic tiles are articles containing a mixture of minerals including clay (generally hydrous silicates of alumina or magnesium) that are fired so the raw materials are fused to produce a finished good that is less than 3.2 cm in actual thickness. All ceramic tile is subject to the scope regardless of end use, surface area, and weight, regardless of whether the tile is glazed or unglazed, regardless of the water absorption coefficient by weight, regardless of the extent of vitrification, and regardless of whether or not the tile is on a backing. Subject merchandise includes ceramic tile with decorative features that may in spots exceed 3.2 cm in thickness and includes ceramic tile ‘‘slabs’’ or ‘‘panels’’ (tiles that are larger than 1 meter2 (11 ft.2)). Subject merchandise includes ceramic tile that undergoes minor processing in a third country prior to importation into the United States. Similarly, subject merchandise includes ceramic tile produced that undergoes minor processing after importation into the United States. Such minor processing includes, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: Beveling, cutting, trimming, staining, painting, polishing, finishing, additional firing, or any other processing that would otherwise not remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope product. Subject merchandise is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under the following subheadings of heading 6907: 6907.21.1005, 6907.21.1011, 6907.21.1051, 6907.21.2000, 6907.21.3000, 6907.21.4000, 6907.21.9011, 6907.21.9051, 6907.22.1005, 6907.22.1011, 6907.22.1051, 6907.22.2000, 6907.22.3000, 6907.22.4000, 6907.22.9011, 6907.22.9051, 6907.23.1005, 6907.23.1011, 6907.23.1051, 6907.23.2000, 6907.23.3000, 6907.23.4000, 6907.23.9011, 6907.23.9051, 6907.30.1005, 6907.30.1011, 6907.30.1051, 6907.30.2000, 6907.30.3000, 6907.30.4000, 6907.30.9011, 6907.30.9051, 6907.40.1005, 6907.40.1011, 6907.40.1051, 6907.40.2000, 6907.40.3000, 6907.40.4000, 6907.40.9011, and 6907.40.9051. Subject merchandise may also enter under subheadings of headings 6914 and 6905: 6914.10.8000, 6914.90.8000, 6905.10.0000, and 6905.90.0050. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive. 19 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 17006 (March 26, 2020). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 Appendix II—Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope Comments IV. Scope of the Investigation V. China-Wide Rate VI. Adjustment to Cash Deposit Rate for Export Subsidies VII. Critical Circumstances VIII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Separate Rate Status of Belite Comment 2: Separate Rate Status of Foshan Sanfi Comment 3: Calculation of the Separate Rate Comment 4: Other Issues IX. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–07188 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–843] Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017– 2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products (CLPP) from India below normal value (NV), and SAB International (SAB) did not, during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2017 through August 31, 2018. DATES: Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–3797, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results on November 14, 2019.1 On February 28, 2020, Commerce extended the deadline for these final results until 1 See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 84 FR 61887 (November 14, 2019) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 May 12, 2020.2 For a complete description of events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper products from India. For a complete description of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Lodha Offset Limited, Pioneer Stationery Private Limited, and Marisa International had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding these companies, nor has any party submitted record evidence which would call our preliminary determination of no shipments into question. Therefore, for the final results, we continue to find that these three companies had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce’s practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by these three companies, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.4 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The list of issues that interested parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, are identified in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 2017–2018,’’ dated February 28, 2020. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 4 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain revisions to the preliminary margin calculations for Navneet and SAB.5 For Navneet, we used Navneet’s comparison market sales to calculate NV rather than relying on constructed value.6 For SAB, we (1) revised SAB’s rent payment to an affiliated party; (2) recalculated SAB’s reported scrap offset, and (3) reversed the incorrect conversion for credit expenses from positive to negative.7 Final Results of the Review We have determined the following weighted-average dumping margins for the exporters or producers listed below for the POR: 8 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Producer/exporter Cellpage Ventures Private Limited .......................................... Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited ..................................... Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd .................................... Lotus Global Private Limited ...... Magic International Pvt. Ltd ........ Navneet Education Ltd ............... PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited .......................................... SAB International ........................ SGM Paper Products ................. Super Impex ............................... 5 See 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93 1.93 0.00 1.93 1.93 Issues and Decision Memorandum. Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India (2017–2018): Sales and Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for the Final Results of Navneet Education Limited (Navneet),’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Lined Paper Products from India (2017–2018): Sales and Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for the Final Results of SAB International (SAB),’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 8 For the companies that were not selected for individual review, we assigned a rate based on the rates for the respondents that were selected for individual review, excluding any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 6 See khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 1.93 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with these final results within five days after publication of these final results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For any individually-examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), Commerce will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of the sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- or customerspecific ad valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. As indicated above, for the companies that had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by these companies, but exported by other parties, at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19435 review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.9 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 9 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products form the People’s Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949, 56952 (September 28, 2006). E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 19436 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 7, 2020 / Notices 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: April 1, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Comments III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results VI. Analysis of Comments Comments Concerning Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet) Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Navneet Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Adjust Navneet’s General and Administrative Expenses Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the SAS Programs to Use Navneet’s Comparison Market Sales for Normal Value (NV) Instead of Constructed Value (CV) Comments Concerning SAB International (SAB) Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial AFA to SAB’s Classification of Certain Sales as Canadian Sales Rather than U.S. Sales Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Adjust SAB’s Calculations of Rent Paid to an Affiliated Party Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Recalculate SAB’s Reported Scrap Offset Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Adjust SAB’s Treatment of Certain Costs Comment 8: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Converted Negative Credit Expenses into Positive Credit Expenses VII. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–07312 Filed 4–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–853] Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Jungbunzlauer Canada, Inc. (JBL Canada), a producer/exporter of citric acid and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from Canada, did not sell subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Apr 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 (POR) May 1, 2018 through April 30, 2019. DATES: Applicable April 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Dowling or George Ayache, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1646 or (202) 482–2623, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 22, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register the Preliminary Results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on citric acid from Canada.1 This review covers one producer/exporter of the subject merchandise, JBL Canada. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.2 No interested party submitted comments.3 On February 11, 2020, JBL Canada submitted a request to participate in a hearing in the event that Commerce held a hearing.4 No other party submitted a request for a hearing in the instant review; therefore, Commerce did not hold a hearing. Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the Order is citric acid from Canada.5 The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 2918.14.0000, 2918.15.1000, 2918.15.5000, and 3824.90.9290. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product 1 See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts from Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019, 85 FR 3611 (January 22, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 Id. 3 JBL Canada submitted a case brief stating: ‘‘Respondent JBL has no comments on Commerce’s Preliminary Results. JBL reserves the right to submit a rebuttal brief in response to any issue(s) which may be raised by Petitioners in their case brief.’’ See JBL Canada’s Letter, ‘‘Tenth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Sales from Canada—Case Brief on Behalf of JBL Canada,’’ dated February 11, 2020. 4 See JBL Canada’s Letter, ‘‘Tenth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Order on Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Sales from Canada—JBL Canada’s Comments regarding Hearing,’’ dated February 11, 2020. 5 See Citric Acid and Citrate Salts from Canada and the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 25703 (May 29, 2009) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 description, available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, remains dispositive.6 Changes Since the Preliminary Results As no parties submitted comments on the margin calculation methodology used in the Preliminary Results, Commerce made no adjustments to that methodology in the final results of this review. Final Results of the Review As a result of this review, Commerce determines that a weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or exported by JBL Canada during the POR. Assessment Rates Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). Because we calculated a zero margin for JBL Canada in the final results of this review, we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. Commerce intends to issue the appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of these final results of review, in accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of these final results for all shipments of citric acid from Canada entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for JBL Canada will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a completed prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers 6 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3. E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19434-19436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-07312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Navneet 
Education Ltd. (Navneet) made sales of certain lined paper products 
(CLPP) from India below normal value (NV), and SAB International (SAB) 
did not, during the period of review (POR) September 1, 2017 through 
August 31, 2018.

DATES: Applicable April 7, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt (for Navneet) and 
Cindy Robinson (for SAB), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 
and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-7851 or (202) 482-3797, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results on November 14, 2019.\1\ 
On February 28, 2020, Commerce extended the deadline for these final 
results until May 12, 2020.\2\ For a complete description of events 
that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 84 FR 61887 (November 14, 
2019) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review: 2017-2018,'' dated February 28, 2020.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018,'' dated concurrently with, 
and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order is certain lined paper 
products from India. For a complete description of the scope of this 
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found that Lodha 
Offset Limited, Pioneer Stationery Private Limited, and Marisa 
International had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. 
Following the publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no 
comments from interested parties regarding these companies, nor has any 
party submitted record evidence which would call our preliminary 
determination of no shipments into question. Therefore, for the final 
results, we continue to find that these three companies had no 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, 
consistent with Commerce's practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of 
merchandise produced by these three companies, but exported by other 
parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at 
the all-others rate.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested 
parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The list 
of issues that interested parties raised, and to which we responded in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, are identified in the appendix to 
this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS).

[[Page 19435]]

ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, 
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the 
main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic 
versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in 
content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on a review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we made certain 
revisions to the preliminary margin calculations for Navneet and 
SAB.\5\ For Navneet, we used Navneet's comparison market sales to 
calculate NV rather than relying on constructed value.\6\ For SAB, we 
(1) revised SAB's rent payment to an affiliated party; (2) recalculated 
SAB's reported scrap offset, and (3) reversed the incorrect conversion 
for credit expenses from positive to negative.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India 
(2017-2018): Sales and Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for 
the Final Results of Navneet Education Limited (Navneet),'' dated 
concurrently with this notice.
    \7\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Lined Paper Products from India 
(2017-2018): Sales and Cost of Production Calculation Memorandum for 
the Final Results of SAB International (SAB),'' dated concurrently 
with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    We have determined the following weighted-average dumping margins 
for the exporters or producers listed below for the POR: \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For the companies that were not selected for individual 
review, we assigned a rate based on the rates for the respondents 
that were selected for individual review, excluding any rates that 
are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. See 
section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act).

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Producer/exporter                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cellpage Ventures Private Limited...........................        1.93
Goldenpalm Manufacturers PVT Limited........................        1.93
Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd.......................        1.93
Lotus Global Private Limited................................        1.93
Magic International Pvt. Ltd................................        1.93
Navneet Education Ltd.......................................        1.93
PP Bafna Ventures Private Limited...........................        1.93
SAB International...........................................        0.00
SGM Paper Products..........................................        1.93
Super Impex.................................................        1.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed in connection with 
these final results within five days after publication of these final 
results in the Federal Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review. For any individually-
examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is above de 
minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), Commerce will calculate importer-specific 
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of 
antidumping duties calculated for each importer's examined sales and 
the total entered value of the sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Where either a respondent's weighted-average dumping 
margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- or customer-specific ad 
valorem rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each 
respondent for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for 
the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction. As indicated above, for the 
companies that had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR, 
we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise 
produced by these companies, but exported by other parties, at the all-
others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction. We intend to issue liquidation 
instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of 
this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate 
for the respondents noted above will be the rate established in the 
final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this 
administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; 
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior 
review, or the original investigation, but the producer is, then the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 
completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject 
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or 
exporters will continue to be 3.91 percent, the all-others rate 
established in the less-than-fair-value investigation.\9\ These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products form the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949, 56952 (September 28, 
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to 
liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and 
the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections

[[Page 19436]]

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: April 1, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Comments
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Analysis of Comments
    Comments Concerning Navneet Education Ltd. (Navneet)
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial 
Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to Navneet
    Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Adjust Navneet's General and 
Administrative Expenses
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the SAS Programs to 
Use Navneet's Comparison Market Sales for Normal Value (NV) Instead 
of Constructed Value (CV)
    Comments Concerning SAB International (SAB)
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Apply Total or Partial AFA to 
SAB's Classification of Certain Sales as Canadian Sales Rather than 
U.S. Sales
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should Adjust SAB's Calculations of 
Rent Paid to an Affiliated Party
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Recalculate SAB's Reported 
Scrap Offset
    Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Adjust SAB's Treatment of 
Certain Costs
    Comment 8: Whether Commerce Incorrectly Converted Negative 
Credit Expenses into Positive Credit Expenses
    VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2020-07312 Filed 4-6-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P