Applications for New Awards; Personnel Development To Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities-Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children With Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs, 17556-17565 [2020-06522]
Download as PDF
17556
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
2019 (OMB# 1850–0645 v.11–12), while
the submission describing all aspects of
the field test and recruitment for the
main study was approved in October
2019 (OMB# 1850–0645 v.13). This
submission request is for all aspects of
the PIRLS 2021 main study, including
data collection activities, with an
accompanying 30-day public comment
period. After the international versions
of the main study questionnaires are
released by IEA in September 2020, a
submission for the main study
questionnaires with the proposed U.S.
adaptations in Appendices C1 and C2
will be submitted in October 2020. In
the case that the final approved U.S.
adapted versions of the PIRLS 2021
main study questionnaires differ from
those provided in that October 2020
submission, the final versions will be
submitted to OMB for approval as a
change request in December 2020.
Dated: March 24, 2020.
Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–06485 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2020–SCC–0054]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Special
Education—Individual Reporting on
Regulatory Compliance Related to the
Personnel Development Program’s
Service Obligation and the
Government Performance and Results
Act (GPRA)
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services (OSERS),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before May 29,
2020.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2020–SCC–0054. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
LBJ, Room 6W–208D, Washington, DC
20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Richelle Davis,
202–245–7401.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Special
Education—Individual Reporting on
Regulatory Compliance Related to the
Personnel Development Program’s
Service Obligation and the Government
Performance and Results Act (GPRA).
OMB Control Number: 1820–0686.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Type of Review: A revision of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 34,262.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 8,328.
Abstract: The Office of Special
Education Program’s Personnel
Development Program aims to increase
the supply of qualified personnel in the
field of special education. The program
awards competitive grants to
Institutions of Higher Education to
support scholars who are preparing to
provide special education and related
services to children and youth with
disabilities. Scholars who receive
funding agree to work in the field of
special education or related services for
two years for each year of support they
receive.
The Personnel Development Program
Data Collection System collects data
from grantees, scholars, and employers
who verify that scholars are employed
in the field of special education or
related services. This data collection
serves three program needs. First, data
from grantees, scholars, and employers
are necessary to assess the performance
of the Personnel Development Program
on its Government Performance Results
Act measures. Second, data from all
three sources are necessary to determine
if scholars comply with the service
obligation requirements. And finally,
project-specific performance data are
collected from grantees for project
monitoring and program improvement.
The forms in this package are updates
to existing Office of Management and
Budget approved forms (1820–0686)
which expire on 8/31/2020.
Dated: March 25, 2020.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–06534 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards;
Personnel Development To Improve
Services and Results for Children With
Disabilities—Interdisciplinary
Preparation in Special Education, Early
Intervention, and Related Services for
Personnel Serving Children With
Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity
Needs
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal
year (FY) 2020 for Personnel
Development to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities—
Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special
Education, Early Intervention, and
Related Services for Personnel Serving
Children with Disabilities who have
High-Intensity Needs, Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number
84.325K. This notice relates to the
approved information collection under
OMB control number 1820–0028.
DATES:
Applications Available: March 30,
2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 29, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information:
No later than April 6, 2020, the Office
of Special Education Programs (OSEP)
will post a pre-recorded informational
webinar designed to provide technical
assistance to interested applicants. The
webinar may be found at www2.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osepgrants.html.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Focus Area A: Sunyoung Ahn, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW, Room 5012A, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–
5076. Telephone: (202) 245–6460.
Email: Sunyoung.Ahn@ed.gov.
For Focus Area B: LaTisha Putney,
U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5060D,
Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202–5076. Telephone: (202) 245–
6172. Email: LaTisha.Putney@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purposes of
this program are to (1) help address
State-identified needs for personnel
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
preparation in special education, early
intervention, related services, and
regular education to work with children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth
with disabilities; and (2) ensure that
those personnel have the necessary
skills and knowledge, derived from
practices that have been determined
through scientifically based research, to
be successful in serving those children.
Priorities: This competition includes
one absolute priority. In accordance
with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this
absolute priority is from allowable
activities specified in the statute (see
sections 662 and 681 of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
(20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Interdisciplinary Preparation in
Special Education, Early Intervention,
and Related Services for Personnel
Serving Children with Disabilities who
have High-Intensity Needs.
Background:
The purpose of this priority is to
increase the number and improve the
quality of personnel who are fully
credentialed to serve children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth
with disabilities who have highintensity needs,1 especially in areas of
chronic personnel shortage. Under this
priority, the Department will fund highquality interdisciplinary 2 projects that
1 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-intensity
needs’’ refers to a complex array of disabilities (e.g.,
multiple disabilities, significant cognitive
disabilities, significant physical disabilities,
significant sensory disabilities, significant autism,
significant emotional disabilities, or significant
learning disabilities, including dyslexia) or the
needs of children with these disabilities requiring
intensive, individualized intervention(s) (i.e., that
are specifically designed to address persistent
learning or behavior difficulties, implemented with
greater frequency and for an extended duration than
is commonly available in a typical classroom or
early intervention setting, or which require
personnel to have knowledge and skills in
identifying and implementing multiple evidencebased interventions).
2 For the purposes of this priority,
‘‘interdisciplinary’’ refers to preparing scholars
from two or more graduate degree programs in
either (a) special education or early intervention
and one or more related services through shared
coursework, group assignments, and coordinated
field experiences; or (b) two or more related
services through shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences.
Different graduate degree programs across more
than one institution of higher education may
partner to develop an interdisciplinary project.
For the purpose of this priority,
‘‘interdisciplinary’’ does not include: (a) Individual
scholars who receive two or more graduate degrees;
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17557
prepare special education, early
intervention, and related services 3
personnel at the master’s degree,
educational specialist degree, or clinical
doctoral degree levels for professional
practice in a variety of education
settings, including natural environments
(the home and community settings in
which children with and without
disabilities participate), early learning
programs, classrooms, and school
settings. The competition will also
prepare personnel who have the
knowledge and skills to support each
child with a disability in meeting high
expectations and to partner with other
providers, families, and administrators
in meaningful and effective
collaborations.
State demand for fully credentialed
special education, early intervention,
and related services personnel to serve
children, including infants, toddlers,
and youth with disabilities, exceeds the
available supply, particularly in highneed schools 4 (Boe et al., 2013). These
shortages can negatively affect the
quality of services provided to children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth
with disabilities and their families (Boe
et al., 2013). These shortages limit the
field’s ability to ensure that each child
has the opportunity to meet challenging
objectives and receive an individualized
education program that is both
meaningful and appropriately
ambitious, which is essential for
preparing them for the future.
The need for personnel with the
knowledge and skills to serve children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth
with disabilities who have highintensity needs, is even greater because
specialized or advanced preparation is
(b) one graduate degree program that prepares
scholars with different areas of focus; (c) one
graduate degree program that offers
interdisciplinary content but does not prepare
scholars from two or more degree programs
together; or (d) one graduate degree program in
special education, early intervention, and related
services partnering with a graduate degree program
other than special education, early intervention, or
related services. Programs in which scholars receive
only a certificate or endorsement without a graduate
degree are not eligible.
3 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘related
services’’ includes the following: Speech-language
pathology and audiology services; interpreting
services; psychological services; applied behavior
analysis; physical therapy and occupational
therapy; recreation, including therapeutic
recreation; social work services; counseling
services, including rehabilitation counseling; and
orientation and mobility services.
4 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-need
school’’ refers to a public elementary or secondary
school that is a ‘‘high-need local educational agency
(LEA),’’ ‘‘high-poverty,’’ ‘‘implementing a
comprehensive support and improvement plan,’’ or
‘‘implementing a targeted support and improvement
plan’’ as defined in footnotes 9, 10, 11, and 12,
respectively.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
17558
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
required to collaboratively design and
deliver evidence-based 5 instruction and
intensive individualized intervention(s)
in natural environments, classrooms,
and schools that address the needs of
these individuals (Boe et al., 2013;
Browder et al., 2014; McLeskey &
Brownell, 2015). Although children,
including infants and toddlers, and
youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs may require the
combined expertise of numerous
professionals (including special
education, early intervention, and
related services providers), it is often
difficult for personnel from varied
professional backgrounds to work
together because they lack shared
information, understanding, and
experience.
Interdisciplinary approaches to
personnel preparation provide scholars
with experience working and learning
in team environments similar to those in
which they are likely to work once
employed (Smith, 2010). That is, when
providing early intervention or special
education services under the IDEA,
personnel serving children, including
infants and toddlers, and youth with
disabilities work on interdisciplinary
teams with parents, general and special
education teachers, early
interventionists, and related service
providers with the expertise to design,
implement, and evaluate instruction,
intervention plans, individualized
family service plans, and individualized
education programs based on the unique
learning and developmental needs of
each child. To enable personnel to
provide efficient, high-quality integrated
services, personnel preparation
programs need to embed content,
practices, and field experience into
preservice training that is aligned with
the interdisciplinary team-based
approaches in which graduates are
likely to work. This priority aims to
fund interdisciplinary projects that will
provide such preparation.
The projects must be awarded and
operated in a manner consistent with
nondiscrimination requirements
contained in the U.S. Constitution and
the Federal civil rights laws.
Priority:
The purpose of this priority is to
increase the number and improve the
quality of personnel who are fully
credentialed to serve children,
including infants and toddlers, and
5 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘evidencebased’’ means, at a minimum, evidence that
demonstrates a rationale (as defined in 34 CFR
77.1), where a key project component included in
the project’s logic model is informed by research or
evaluation findings that suggest the project
component is likely to improve relevant outcomes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs—especially in areas of
chronic personnel shortage. The priority
will fund high-quality interdisciplinary
projects that prepare special education,
early intervention, and related services
personnel at the master’s degree,
educational specialist degree, or clinical
doctoral degree levels for professional
practice in natural environments, early
learning programs, classrooms, and
school settings serving children,
including infants and toddlers, and
youth with disabilities.
Specifically, an applicant must
propose an interdisciplinary project
supporting scholars 6 from two or more
graduate degree programs in either (a)
special education or early intervention
and one or more related services; or (b)
two or more related services.
An interdisciplinary project is a
project that delivers core content
through shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field
experiences as part of two or more
master’s degree, educational specialist
degree, or clinical doctoral degree
programs for scholars. Not all
requirements (e.g., courses and field
experiences) of each participating
graduate degree program must be shared
across all degree programs participating
in the interdisciplinary project, but the
interdisciplinary project must: (a)
Identify the competencies needed to
promote high expectations and address
the individualized needs of children
with disabilities who have highintensity needs using an
interdisciplinary approach to service
delivery; (b) outline how the project will
build capacity in those areas through
shared coursework, group assignments,
and coordinated field experiences for
6 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘scholar’’ is
limited to an individual who (a) is pursuing a
master’s, educational specialist degree, or clinical
doctoral graduate degree in special education, early
intervention, or related services (as defined in this
notice); (b) receives scholarship assistance as
authorized under section 662 of IDEA (34 CFR
304.3(g)); (c) will be eligible for a license,
endorsement, or certification from a State or
national credentialing authority following
completion of the graduate degree program
identified in the application; and (d) will be able
to be employed in a position that serves children
with disabilities for either 51 percent of their time
or case load. See https://pdp.ed.gov/OSEP/Home/
Regulation for more information.
Scholars from each graduate degree program
participating in the proposed interdisciplinary
project must receive scholar support and be eligible
to fulfill service obligation requirements following
graduate degree program completion. Scholars from
each graduate degree program participating in this
project must complete the requirements of their
unique graduate degree program and receive
different graduate degrees. Individuals pursuing
degrees in general education or early childhood
education do not qualify as ‘‘scholars’’ eligible for
scholarship assistance.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
scholars supported by the proposed
project; and (c) identify the aspects of
each graduate degree program that are
shared across all participating degree
programs and those that remain unique
to each.
Projects may include individuals who
are in degree programs (e.g., general
education, early childhood education,
administration) and who are
cooperating with, but not funded as
scholars by, the applicant’s proposed
interdisciplinary project. These
individuals may participate in the
shared coursework, group assignments,
coordinated field experiences, and other
opportunities required of scholars and
funded by the project (e.g., speaker
series, monthly seminars) if doing so
does not diminish the benefit for
project-funded scholars (e.g., by
reducing funds available for scholar
support or limiting opportunities for
scholars to participate in project
activities).
Personnel preparation degree
programs that prepare all scholars to be
dually certified can qualify under this
priority by partnering with at least one
additional graduate degree program in
related services.
Personnel preparation programs that
prepare individuals to be educational
interpreters for the deaf at the bachelor’s
degree level can qualify under this
priority and are exempted from (a) the
interdisciplinary requirement and (b)
the requirement for two or more
graduate degree programs. All other
priority requirements specified for
graduate programs will apply to the
bachelor’s program. While
interdisciplinary projects are not
required for educational interpreters,
they are encouraged.
Focus Areas: Within this absolute
priority, the Secretary intends to
support interdisciplinary projects under
the following two focus areas: (A)
Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants,
Toddlers, and Preschool-Age Children
with Disabilities who have HighIntensity Needs; and (B) Preparing
Personnel to Serve School-Age Children
with Disabilities who have HighIntensity Needs.
Applicants must identify the specific
focus area (i.e., A or B) under which
they are applying as part of the
competition title on the application
cover sheet (SF 424, line 12). Applicants
may not submit the same proposal
under more than one focus area.
Applicants may submit different
proposals in different focus areas.
Focus Area A: Preparing Personnel to
Serve Infants, Toddlers, and PreschoolAge Children with Disabilities who have
High-Intensity Needs. This focus area is
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
for interdisciplinary projects that
deliver core content through shared
coursework, group assignments, and
coordinated field experiences for
scholars across two or more graduate
degree programs in either: (a) Early
intervention or early childhood special
education and related services for
infants, toddlers, and preschool-age
children with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more
related services to serve infants,
toddlers, and preschool-age children
with disabilities who have highintensity needs.
Early intervention personnel are those
who are prepared to provide services to
infants and toddlers with disabilities
ages birth to three, and early childhood
personnel are those who are prepared to
provide services to children with
disabilities ages three through five (and
in States where the age range is other
than ages three through five, we defer to
the State’s certification for early
childhood special education). In States
where certification in early intervention
is combined with certification in early
childhood special education, applicants
may propose a combined early
intervention and early childhood
special education personnel preparation
project under this focus area.
Note: OSEP may fund out of rank
order high-quality applications from
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities (HBCUs).7 OSEP also may
fund out of rank order high-quality
applications to ensure that projects are
funded across both Focus Area A and
Focus Area B.
Focus Area B: Preparing Personnel to
Serve School-Age Children with
Disabilities who have High-Intensity
Needs. This focus area is for
interdisciplinary projects that deliver
core content through shared
coursework, group assignments, and
coordinated field experiences to
scholars across two or more graduate
degree programs in either: (a) Special
education and related services for
school-age children with disabilities
who have high-intensity needs; or (b)
two or more related services to serve
school-age children with disabilities
who have high-intensity needs.
Note: OSEP may fund out of rank
order high-quality applications from
HBCUs. OSEP also may fund out of rank
order high-quality applications to
ensure that projects are funded across
both Focus Area A and Focus Area B.
Focus Areas A and B:
7 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘Historically
Black College or University’’ is as defined under
section 322 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as
amended.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Applicants may use up to the first 12
months of the performance period and
up to $100,000 of the first budget period
for planning without enrolling scholars.
Applicants must clearly provide
sufficient justification for requesting
program planning time and include the
goals, objectives, and intended
outcomes of program planning in year
one, a description of the proposed
strategies and activities to be supported,
and a timeline for the work; such as—
(1) Outlining or updating coursework,
group assignments, or coordinated field
experience needed to support
interdisciplinary preparation for special
education, early intervention, or related
services personnel serving children with
disabilities who have high-intensity
needs;
(2) Building capacity (e.g., hiring of a
field supervisor, providing professional
development for field supervisors, and
training for faculty);
(3) Purchasing needed resources (e.g.,
additional teaching supplies or
specialized equipment to enhance
instruction); or
(4) Negotiating agreements with
programs or schools to serve as sites for
coordinated field experience needed to
support delivery of the proposed
interdisciplinary project.
Additional Federal funds may be
requested for scholar support and other
grant activities occurring in year one of
the project, provided that the total
request for year one does not exceed the
maximum award available for one
budget period of 12 months (i.e.,
$250,000).
Note: Applicants proposing projects
to develop, expand, or add a new area
of emphasis to special education, early
intervention, or related services
programs must provide, in their
applications, information on how these
new areas will be sustained once
Federal funding ends.
To be considered for funding under
this absolute priority, all program
applicants must meet the application
requirements contained in this priority.
All projects funded under this absolute
priority also must meet the
programmatic and administrative
requirements specified in this priority.
Note: Applicants are required to meet
the matching support for the proposed
project at 10 percent of the total amount
of the grant as specified in paragraph
(d)(10) of the priority requirements for
an application to be reviewed and be
considered eligible to receive an award.
To meet the requirements of this
priority an applicant must—
(a) Demonstrate, in the narrative
section of the application under
‘‘Significance,’’ how—
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17559
(1) The project addresses national,
State, regional, or district shortages of
personnel who are fully qualified to
serve children with disabilities, ages
birth through 21, who have highintensity needs. To address this
requirement, the applicant must—
(i) Present data on the quality of each
special education, early intervention, or
related services personnel preparation
degree program participating in the
project, in areas such as: The average
amount of time it takes for scholars to
complete the program; the percentage of
program graduates who receive a
license, endorsement, or certification
related to special education, related
services, or early intervention services;
the percentage of program graduates
finding employment related to their
preparation after graduation; the
effectiveness of program graduates in
providing special education, early
intervention, or related services, which
could include data on the learning and
developmental outcomes of children
with disabilities they serve; the
percentage of program graduates who
maintain employment for two or more
years in the area for which they were
prepared; and the percentage of
employers who rate the preparation of
scholars who complete their degree
program as adequate or higher; and
(ii) If available for the degree
programs participating in the proposed
project, present data on the quality of
their interdisciplinary approaches to the
preparation of special education, early
intervention, or related services
personnel; and
Note: Data on the quality of a
personnel preparation program should
be no older than five years prior to the
start date of the project proposed in the
application. When reporting
percentages, the denominator (i.e., total
number of scholars or program
graduates) must be provided.
(2) The project will increase the
number of personnel who demonstrate
the competencies 8 needed to—
(i) Promote high expectations;
(ii) Differentiate instruction;
(iii) Provide intensive individualized
instruction and intervention(s); and
(iv) Collaborate with diverse
stakeholders using an interdisciplinary
8 For the purposes of this priority,
‘‘competencies’’ means what a person knows and
can do—the knowledge, skills, and dispositions
necessary to effectively function in a role (National
Professional Development Center on Inclusion,
2011). These competencies should ensure that
personnel are able to use challenging academic
standards, child achievement and functional
standards, and assessments to improve instructional
practices, services, learning and developmental
outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional,
behavioral), and college- and career-readiness of
children with disabilities.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
17560
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
team-based approach to address the
individualized needs of children with
disabilities who have high-intensity
needs, ages birth through 21, and
designed to achieve improvements in
learning or developmental outcomes
(e.g., academic, social, emotional,
behavioral), or successful transition to
postsecondary education and the
workforce. To address this requirement,
the applicant must—
(A) Identify the competencies that
special education, early intervention, or
related services personnel need to—
(1) Promote high expectations;
(2) Differentiate instruction;
(3) Provide intensive individualized
instruction and intervention(s); and
(4) Collaborate with parents, families,
and diverse stakeholders using an
interdisciplinary team-based approach
designed to lead to improved learning
and developmental outcomes; ensure
access to and progress in academic
achievement standards or alternate
academic achievement standards, as
appropriate; lead to successful
transition to college and career for
children with disabilities, including
children with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs; and maximize the
use of effective technology, including
assistive technology, to deliver
instruction, interventions, and services;
(B) Identify the competencies needed
by members of interdisciplinary teams
to promote high expectations and
improve early childhood, educational,
and employment outcomes for children
with disabilities who have highintensity needs;
(C) Identify the competencies that
personnel need to support inclusion of
children with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs in the least
restrictive and natural environments to
the maximum extent appropriate by
intentionally promoting high
expectations and participation in
learning and social activities to foster
development, learning, academic
achievement, friendships with peers,
and sense of belonging;
(D) Identify how scholars will be
prepared to develop, implement, and
evaluate evidence-based instruction and
evidence-based interventions that
improve outcomes for children with
disabilities who have high-intensity
needs in a variety of settings (e.g.,
natural environments; public schools,
including charter schools; private
schools, including parochial schools;
and other nonpublic education settings,
including home education); and
(E) Provide a conceptual framework
for the proposed interdisciplinary
personnel preparation project, including
any empirical support for project
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
activities designed to promote the
acquisition of the identified
competencies (see paragraph (a)(2) of
the requirements for this priority)
needed by special education, early
intervention, or related services
personnel, and how these competencies
relate to the proposed project;
(b) Demonstrate, in the narrative
section of the application under
‘‘Quality of project services,’’ how the
project—
(1) Will conduct its planning
activities, if the applicant will use any
of the allowable first 12 months of the
project period for planning;
(2) Will recruit and retain high-quality
scholars into each of the graduate degree
programs participating in the project
and ensure equal access and treatment
for eligible project participants who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability. To meet this
requirement, the applicant must
describe—
(i) Criteria the applicant will use to
identify high-quality applicants for
admission into each of the graduate
degree programs participating in the
project;
(ii) Recruitment strategies the
applicant will use to attract high-quality
applicants and any specific recruitment
strategies targeting high-quality
applicants from traditionally
underrepresented groups, including
individuals with disabilities; and
(iii) The approach, including
mentoring, monitoring, and
accommodations, the applicant will use
to support scholars to complete their
respective degree programs;
(3) Reflects current evidence-based
practices, including practices in the
areas of literacy and numeracy
development, assessment, behavior,
instructional practices, and inclusive
strategies, as appropriate, and is
designed to prepare scholars in the
identified competencies. To address this
requirement, the applicant must
describe how the project will—
(i) Incorporate current evidence-based
practices (including relevant research
citations) that improve outcomes for
children with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs into (a) the
required coursework and field
experiences for each graduate degree
program participating in the project; and
(b) the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field
experiences required for the
interdisciplinary portions of the project;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ii) Use evidence-based professional
development practices for adult learners
to instruct scholars;
(4) Is of sufficient quality, intensity,
and duration to prepare scholars in the
identified competencies. To address this
requirement, the applicant must
describe how—
(i) The components of (a) each
graduate degree program participating
in the project; and (b) the shared
coursework, group assignments, and
coordinated field experiences required
for the interdisciplinary portions of the
proposed project will support scholars’
acquisition and enhancement of the
identified competencies;
(ii) The components of (a) each
graduate degree program participating
in the project; and (b) the shared
coursework, group assignments, and
coordinated field experiences required
for the interdisciplinary portions of the
proposed project will be integrated to
allow scholars, in collaboration with
other team members, to use their
knowledge and skills in designing,
implementing, and evaluating practices
supported by evidence to address the
learning and developmental needs of
children with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs;
(iii) Scholars will be provided with
ongoing guidance and feedback during
training; and
(iv) The proposed project will provide
ongoing induction opportunities and
mentoring support to graduates of each
graduate degree program participating
in the project;
(5) Will engage in meaningful and
effective collaboration with appropriate
partners representing diverse
stakeholders, including—
(i) High-need schools, which may
include high-need local educational
agencies (LEAs),9 high-poverty
schools,10 schools identified for
comprehensive support and
improvement,11 and schools
9 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-need
LEA’’ means an LEA (a) that serves not fewer than
10,000 children from families with incomes below
the poverty line; or (b) for which not less than 20
percent of the children are from families with
incomes below the poverty line.
10 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-poverty
school’’ means a school in which at least 50 percent
of students are from low-income families as
determined using one of the measures of poverty
specified under section 1113(a)(5) of the Elementary
and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA). For middle and high schools, eligibility
may be calculated on the basis of comparable data
from feeder schools. Eligibility as a high-poverty
school under this definition is determined on the
basis of the most currently available data.
11 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘school
implementing a comprehensive support and
improvement plan’’ means a school identified for
comprehensive support and improvement by a State
under section 1111(c)(4)(D) of the ESEA that
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
implementing a targeted support and
improvement plan 12 for children with
disabilities; early childhood and early
intervention programs located within
the geographic boundaries of a highneed LEA; and early childhood and
early intervention programs located
within the geographical boundaries of
an LEA serving the highest percentage
of schools identified for comprehensive
support and improvement or
implementing targeted support and
improvement plans in the State. The
purpose of these partnerships is to
provide field practice for scholars aimed
at developing the identified
competencies as members of
interdisciplinary teams; and
(ii) Other personnel preparation
programs on campus or at partnering
universities for the purpose of sharing
resources, supporting program
development and delivery, and
addressing personnel shortages;
(6) Will use technology, as
appropriate, to promote scholar learning
and professional practice, enhance the
efficiency of the project, collaborate
with partners, and facilitate ongoing
mentoring and support for scholars;
(7) Will ensure that scholars
understand how to use technology to
support student learning and students’
use of educational and assistive
technology; and
(8) Will align with and use resources,
as appropriate, available through
technical assistance centers, which may
include centers funded by the
Department;
Note: Use the ‘‘Find a Center or
Grant’’ link at https://
osepideasthatwork.org for information
about OSEP-funded technical assistance
centers.
(c) Demonstrate, in the narrative
section of the application under
‘‘Quality of the project evaluation,’’
how—
(1) The applicant will use
comprehensive and appropriate
methodologies to evaluate how well the
goals or objectives of the proposed
project have been met, including the
project processes and outcomes;
includes (a) not less than the lowest performing 5
percent of all schools in the State receiving funds
under Title I, Part A of the ESEA; (b) all public high
schools in the State failing to graduate one third or
more of their students; and (c) public schools in the
State described under section 1111(d)(3)(A)(i)(II) of
the ESEA.
12 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘school
implementing a targeted support and improvement
plan’’ means a school identified for targeted support
and improvement by a State that has developed and
is implementing a school-level targeted support and
improvement plan to improve student outcomes
based on the indicators in the statewide
accountability system as defined in section
1111(d)(2) of the ESEA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
(2) The applicant will collect, analyze,
and use data related to specific and
measurable goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the project. To address this
requirement, the applicant must
describe how—
(i) Scholar competencies and other
project processes and outcomes will be
measured for formative evaluation
purposes, including proposed
instruments, data collection methods,
and possible analyses; and
(ii) It will collect and analyze data on
the quality of services provided by
scholars who complete the graduate
degree programs involved in this
interdisciplinary project and are
employed in the field for which they
were trained, including data on the
learning and developmental outcomes
(e.g., academic, social, emotional,
behavioral, meeting college- and careerready standards), and on growth toward
these outcomes, of the children with
disabilities who have high-intensity
needs;
Note: Following the completion of the
project period, grantees are encouraged
to engage in ongoing data collection
activities.
(3) The methods of evaluation will
produce quantitative and qualitative
data for objective performance measures
that are related to the outcomes of the
proposed project; and
(4) The methods of evaluation will
provide performance feedback and
allow for periodic assessment of
progress towards meeting the project
outcomes. To address this requirement,
the applicant must describe how—
(i) Results of the evaluation will be
used as a basis for improving the
proposed project to prepare special
education, early intervention, or related
services personnel to provide (a)
focused instruction; and (b) intensive
individualized intervention(s) in an
interdisciplinary team-based approach
to improve outcomes of children with
disabilities who have high-intensity
needs; and
(ii) The grantee will report the
evaluation results to OSEP in its annual
and final performance reports;
(d) Demonstrate, in the narrative
under ‘‘Project Assurances’’ or in the
applicable appendices, that the
following program requirements are
met. The applicant must—
(1) Provide scholar support for
participants from two or more graduate
degree programs partnering in the
proposed interdisciplinary personnel
preparation project. Consistent with 34
CFR 304.30, each scholar must (a)
receive support for no less than one
academic year, and (b) be eligible to
fulfill service obligation requirements
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17561
following degree program completion.
Funding across degree programs may be
applied differently;
(2) Include in Appendix B of the
application—
(i) Table(s) that summarize the
required program of study for each
degree program and that clearly
delineate the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field
experiences required of all project
scholars to support interdisciplinary
practice;
(ii) Course syllabi for all coursework
in the major of each degree program and
all shared courses, group assignments,
and coordinated field experiences
required of project scholars; and
(iii) Learning outcomes for proposed
coursework;
(3) Ensure that a comprehensive set of
completed syllabi, including syllabi
created or revised as part of a project
planning year, are submitted to OSEP by
the end of year one of the grant;
(4) Ensure scholars will not be
selected based on race, ethnicity, or
national origin. Per the Supreme Court’s
decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc.
v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), the
Department does not allow the selection
of individuals on the basis of race,
ethnicity, or national origin. For this
reason, grantees must ensure that any
discussion of the recruitment of scholars
based on race, ethnicity, or national
origin distinguishes between increasing
the pool of applicants and actually
selecting scholars;
(5) Ensure that the project will meet
all requirements in 34 CFR 304.23,
particularly those related to (a)
informing all scholarship recipients of
their service obligation commitment and
(b) disbursing scholar support. Failure
by a grantee to properly meet these
requirements would be a violation of the
grant award that could result in
sanctions, including the grantee being
liable for returning any misused funds
to the Department;
(6) Ensure that prior approval from
the OSEP project officer will be
obtained before admitting additional
scholars beyond the number of scholars
proposed in the application and before
transferring a scholar to another OSEPfunded grant;
(7) Ensure that the project will meet
the statutory requirements in section
662(e) through (h) of IDEA;
(8) Ensure that at least 65 percent of
the total award over the project period
(i.e., up to 5 years) will be used for
scholar support. Applicants proposing
to use year one for program
development may budget for less than
65 percent of the total requested budget
over the 5 years for scholar support;
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
17562
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
such applicants must ensure that 65
percent of the total award minus funds
allocated for program development will
be used for scholar support;
(9) Ensure that the institution of
higher education (IHE) at which
scholars are enrolled in the program
will not require those scholars to work
(e.g., as graduate assistants) as a
condition of receiving support (e.g.,
tuition, stipends) from the proposed
project, unless the work is specifically
related to the acquisition of scholars’
competencies or the requirements for
completion of their personnel
preparation program. This prohibition
on work as a condition of receiving
support does not apply to the service
obligation requirements in section
662(h) of IDEA;
(10) Demonstrate, in the budget
information (ED 524, Section B) and
budget narrative, matching support for
the proposed project at 10 percent of the
total amount of the grant. Applicants
must propose the amount of cash or inkind resources;
Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562,
educational training grants under this
program have an 8 percent limit on
indirect costs. The difference between a
grantee’s negotiated indirect cost rate
and the 8 percent limit cannot be used
to meet this absolute priority.
Matching support can be either cash
or in-kind donations. Under 2 CFR
200.306, a cash expenditure or outlay of
cash with respect to the matching
budget by the grantee is considered a
cash contribution. Certain cash
contributions that the organization
normally considers an indirect cost
should not be counted as a direct cost
for the purposes of meeting matching
support. Unrecovered indirect costs
cannot be used to meet the non-Federal
matching support. Under 2 CFR
200.434, third-party in-kind
contributions are services or property
(e.g., land, buildings, equipment,
materials, supplies) that are contributed
by a non-Federal third party at no
charge to the grantee.
To the maximum extent possible,
OSEP encourages matching support be
used toward scholar support.
(11) Ensure that the budget includes
attendance of the project director at a
three-day project directors’ meeting in
Washington, DC, during each year of the
project;
(12) Ensure that the project director,
key personnel, and, as appropriate,
scholars will actively participate in the
cross-project collaboration, advanced
trainings, and cross-site learning
opportunities (e.g., webinars, briefings)
organized by OSEP. This partnership
will be used to build capacity of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
participants, increase the impact of
funding, and promote innovative and
interdisciplinary service delivery
models across projects;
(13) Ensure that if the project
maintains a website, relevant
information and documents are in a
format that meets government or
industry-recognized standards for
accessibility; and
(14) Ensure that annual data will be
submitted on each scholar who receives
grant support (OMB Control Number
1820–0686). The primary purposes of
the data collection are to track the
service obligation fulfillment of scholars
who receive funds from OSEP grants
and to collect data for program
performance measure reporting under
the Government Performance and
Results Modernization Act of 2010
(GPRA). Applicants are encouraged to
visit the Personnel Development
Program Data Collection System (DCS)
website at https://pdp.ed.gov/osep for
further information about this data
collection requirement. Typically, data
collection begins in January of each
year, and grantees are notified by email
about the data collection period for their
grant, although grantees may submit
data as needed, year round. This data
collection must be submitted
electronically by the grantee and does
not supplant the annual grant
performance report required of each
grantee for continuation funding (see 34
CFR 75.590). Data collection includes
the submission of a signed, completed
Pre-Scholarship Agreement and Exit
Certification for each scholar funded
under an OSEP grant (see paragraph (5)
of this section).
Competitive Preference Priorities:
Within this absolute priority, we give
competitive preference to applications
that address the following priorities.
In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(v), Competitive Preference
Priority 1 is from allowable activities
specified in the statute (see sections 662
and 681 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1462 and
1481)). Competitive Preference Priority
2 is from the Department’s
Administrative Priorities for
Discretionary Grant Programs published
in the Federal Register on March 9,
2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative
Priorities).
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we
award up to an additional 5 points to an
application, depending on how well the
application meets Competitive
Preference Priority 1, and an additional
7 points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2.
Applicants should indicate in the
abstract which, if any, competitive
preference priorities are addressed.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1 (0 to
5 points).
Applicants that demonstrate matching
support 13 for the proposed project at—
(i) 20 percent of the total amount of
the grant (2 points);
(ii) 30 percent of the total amount of
the grant (3 points);
(iii) 40 percent of the total amount of
the grant (4 points); or
(iv) 50 percent of the total amount of
the grant (5 points).
Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562,
educational training grants under this
program have an 8 percent limit on
indirect costs. The difference between
an applicant’s negotiated indirect cost
rate (e.g., 40 percent) and the 8 percent
limit cannot be used to meet any portion
of the competitive preference priority.
Note: Applicants must address this
competitive preference priority, if
applicable, in the budget information
(ED 524, Section B) and the budget
narrative. The applicant must propose
the amount of cash or in-kind resources
to be contributed for each year of the
grant.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
Applications from New Potential
Grantees (0 or 7 points).
(a) Under this priority, an applicant
must demonstrate that the applicant has
not had an active discretionary grant
under the program from which it seeks
funds, including through membership
in a group application submitted in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.127–75.129,
five years before the deadline date for
submission of applications under the
program.
(b) For the purpose of this priority, a
grant or contract is active until the end
of the grant’s or contract’s project or
funding period, including any
extensions of those periods that extend
the grantee’s or contractor’s authority to
obligate funds.
References
Boe, E. E., deBettencourt, L., Dewey, J. F.,
Rosenberg, M. S., Sindelar, P. T., & Leko,
C. D. (2013). Variability in demand for
special education teachers: Indicators,
explanations, and impacts.
Exceptionality, 21(2), 103–125.
13 For the purposes of this priority, matching
support can be either cash or in-kind donations.
According to 2 CFR 200.306, a cash expenditure or
an outlay of cash with respect to the matching
budget by the grantee is considered a cash
contribution. Certain cash contributions that the
organization normally considers an indirect cost
should not be counted as a direct cost for the
purposes of meeting matching support. According
to 2 CFR 200.434, third-party in-kind contributions
are services or property (e.g., land, buildings,
equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed
by a non-Federal third-party at no charge to the
grantee.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., &
Ribuffo, C. (2014). Evidence-based
practices for students with severe
disabilities (Document No. IC–3). https://
ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tool/
innovation-configurations/.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq. (2004).
McLeskey, J., & Brownell, M. (2015). Highleverage practices and teacher
preparation in special education
(Document No. PR–1). https://
ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/
uploads/2016/05/High-LeveragePractices-and-Teacher-Preparation-inSpecial-Education.pdf.
National Professional Development Center on
Inclusion. (August, 2011). Competencies
for early childhood educators in the
context of inclusion: Issues and guidance
for States. The University of North
Carolina, FPG Child Development
Institute.
Smith, J. (2010). An interdisciplinary
approach to preparing early intervention
professionals: A university and
community collaborative initiative.
Teacher Education and Special
Education, 33(2), 131–142.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department
generally offers interested parties the
opportunity to comment on proposed
priorities. Section 681(d) of IDEA,
however, makes the public comment
requirements of the APA inapplicable to
the absolute priority and Competitive
Preference Priority 1 in this notice.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1462 and
1481.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98,
and 99. (b) The Office of Management
and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
The regulations for this program in 34
CFR part 304. (e) The Administrative
Priorities.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$1,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
2021 from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$200,000–$250,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$225,000.
Maximum Award: We will not make
an award exceeding $250,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs and
private nonprofit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Cost
sharing or matching is required for this
competition. See the absolute priority.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this
competition may not award subgrants to
entities to directly carry out project
activities described in its application.
Under 34 CFR 75.708(e), a grantee may
contract for supplies, equipment, and
other services in accordance with 2 CFR
part 200.
4. Other General Requirements: (a)
Recipients of funding under this
competition must make positive efforts
to employ and advance in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities
(see section 606 of IDEA).
(b) Applicants for, and recipients of,
funding must, with respect to the
aspects of their proposed project
relating to the absolute priority, involve
individuals with disabilities, or parents
of individuals with disabilities ages
birth through 26, in planning,
implementing, and evaluating the
project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of
IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an
application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
competition.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17563
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative (Part III of the
application) is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the application narrative to no
more than 50 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double-space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
reference citations, and captions, as well
as all text in charts, tables, figures,
graphs, and screen shots.
• Use a font that is 12 point or larger.
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the
narrative budget justification; Part IV,
the assurances and certifications; or the
abstract (follow the guidance provided
in the application package for
completing the abstract), the table of
contents, the list of priority
requirements, the resumes, the reference
list, the letters of support, or the
appendices. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative,
including all text in charts, tables,
figures, graphs, and screen shots.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this competition are from 34
CFR 75.210 and are as follows:
(a) Significance (10 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
significance of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the significance of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed
project will prepare personnel for fields
in which shortages have been
demonstrated; and
(ii) The importance or magnitude of
the results or outcomes likely to be
attained by the proposed project,
especially improvements in teaching
and student achievement.
(b) Quality of project services (45
points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
services to be provided by the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
17564
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
quality and sufficiency of strategies for
ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(3) In determining the quality of the
project services, the Secretary considers
the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the services to
be provided by the proposed project
reflect up-to-date knowledge from
research and effective practice;
(ii) The extent to which the training
or professional development services to
be provided by the proposed project are
of sufficient quality, intensity, and
duration to lead to improvements in
practice among the recipients of those
services;
(iii) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
involve the collaboration of appropriate
partners for maximizing the
effectiveness of project services; and
(iv) The extent to which the proposed
activities constitute a coherent,
sustained program of training in the
field.
(c) Quality of the project evaluation
(25 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the
evaluation, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
outcomes of the proposed project;
(ii) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable;
(iii) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation include the use of
objective performance measures that are
clearly related to the intended outcomes
of the project and will produce
quantitative and qualitative data to the
extent possible; and
(iv) The extent to which the methods
of evaluation will provide performance
feedback and permit periodic
assessment of progress toward achieving
intended outcomes.
(d) Quality of project personnel,
quality of the management plan, and
adequacy of resources (20 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project personnel, the
quality of the management plan, and the
adequacy of resources for the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the quality of
project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel;
(ii) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks;
(iii) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
principal investigator and other key
project personnel are appropriate and
adequate to meet the objectives of the
proposed project;
(iv) The adequacy of support,
including facilities, equipment,
supplies, and other resources, from the
applicant organization or the lead
applicant organization; and
(v) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the objectives,
design, and potential significance of the
proposed project.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection
Process Factors: In the past, the
Department has had difficulty finding
peer reviewers for certain competitions
because so many individuals who are
eligible to serve as peer reviewers have
conflicts of interest. The standing panel
requirements under section 682(b) of
IDEA also have placed additional
constraints on the availability of
reviewers. Therefore, the Department
has determined that for some
discretionary grant competitions,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
applications may be separated into two
or more groups and ranked and selected
for funding within specific groups. This
procedure will make it easier for the
Department to find peer reviewers by
ensuring that greater numbers of
individuals who are eligible to serve as
reviewers for any particular group of
applicants will not have conflicts of
interest. It also will increase the quality,
independence, and fairness of the
review process, while permitting panel
members to review applications under
discretionary grant competitions for
which they also have submitted
applications.
4. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the
Secretary may impose specific
conditions and, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
5. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management. You may review
and comment on any information about
yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently
in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee that is
awarded competitive grant funds must
have a plan to disseminate these public
grant deliverables. This dissemination
plan can be developed and submitted
after your application has been
reviewed and selected for funding. For
additional information on the open
licensing requirements please refer to 2
CFR 3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Mar 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
5. Performance Measures: Under
GPRA, the Department has established a
set of performance measures, including
long-term measures, that are designed to
yield information on various aspects of
the effectiveness and quality of the
Personnel Development to Improve
Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities program. These measures
include: (1) The percentage of
preparation programs that incorporate
scientifically or evidence-based
practices into their curricula; (2) the
percentage of scholars completing
preparation programs who are
knowledgeable and skilled in evidencebased practices that improve outcomes
for children with disabilities; (3) the
percentage of scholars who exit
preparation programs prior to
completion due to poor academic
performance; (4) the percentage of
scholars completing preparation
programs who are working in the area(s)
in which they were prepared upon
program completion; and (5) the Federal
cost per scholar who completed the
preparation program.
In addition, the Department will
gather information on the following
outcome measures: (1) The percentage
of scholars who completed the
preparation program and are employed
in high-need districts; (2) the percentage
of scholars who completed the
preparation program and are employed
in the field of special education for at
least two years; and (3) the percentage
of scholars who completed the
preparation program and who are rated
effective by their employers.
Grantees may be asked to participate
in assessing and providing information
on these aspects of program quality.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17565
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact persons
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services
Administration. Delegated the authority to
perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–06522 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0055]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Loan
Discharge Application: Forgery
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 61 (Monday, March 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17556-17565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06522]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Personnel Development To Improve
Services and Results for Children With Disabilities--Interdisciplinary
Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related
Services for Personnel Serving Children With Disabilities Who Have
High-Intensity Needs
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
[[Page 17557]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for
Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities--Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early
Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.325K. This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB control number 1820-0028.
DATES:
Applications Available: March 30, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 29, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information: No later than April 6, 2020,
the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) will post a pre-
recorded informational webinar designed to provide technical assistance
to interested applicants. The webinar may be found at www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osep-grants.html.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Focus Area A: Sunyoung Ahn, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5012A, Potomac
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6460.
Email: [email protected].
For Focus Area B: LaTisha Putney, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5060D, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6172. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purposes of this program are to (1) help
address State-identified needs for personnel preparation in special
education, early intervention, related services, and regular education
to work with children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with
disabilities; and (2) ensure that those personnel have the necessary
skills and knowledge, derived from practices that have been determined
through scientifically based research, to be successful in serving
those children.
Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority. In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this absolute priority is from
allowable activities specified in the statute (see sections 662 and 681
of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C.
1462 and 1481)).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
This priority is:
Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early
Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs.
Background:
The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve
the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs,\1\ especially in areas of chronic personnel shortage.
Under this priority, the Department will fund high-quality
interdisciplinary \2\ projects that prepare special education, early
intervention, and related services \3\ personnel at the master's
degree, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree
levels for professional practice in a variety of education settings,
including natural environments (the home and community settings in
which children with and without disabilities participate), early
learning programs, classrooms, and school settings. The competition
will also prepare personnel who have the knowledge and skills to
support each child with a disability in meeting high expectations and
to partner with other providers, families, and administrators in
meaningful and effective collaborations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-intensity needs''
refers to a complex array of disabilities (e.g., multiple
disabilities, significant cognitive disabilities, significant
physical disabilities, significant sensory disabilities, significant
autism, significant emotional disabilities, or significant learning
disabilities, including dyslexia) or the needs of children with
these disabilities requiring intensive, individualized
intervention(s) (i.e., that are specifically designed to address
persistent learning or behavior difficulties, implemented with
greater frequency and for an extended duration than is commonly
available in a typical classroom or early intervention setting, or
which require personnel to have knowledge and skills in identifying
and implementing multiple evidence-based interventions).
\2\ For the purposes of this priority, ``interdisciplinary''
refers to preparing scholars from two or more graduate degree
programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and
one or more related services through shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences; or (b) two or more
related services through shared coursework, group assignments, and
coordinated field experiences. Different graduate degree programs
across more than one institution of higher education may partner to
develop an interdisciplinary project.
For the purpose of this priority, ``interdisciplinary'' does not
include: (a) Individual scholars who receive two or more graduate
degrees; (b) one graduate degree program that prepares scholars with
different areas of focus; (c) one graduate degree program that
offers interdisciplinary content but does not prepare scholars from
two or more degree programs together; or (d) one graduate degree
program in special education, early intervention, and related
services partnering with a graduate degree program other than
special education, early intervention, or related services. Programs
in which scholars receive only a certificate or endorsement without
a graduate degree are not eligible.
\3\ For the purposes of this priority, ``related services''
includes the following: Speech-language pathology and audiology
services; interpreting services; psychological services; applied
behavior analysis; physical therapy and occupational therapy;
recreation, including therapeutic recreation; social work services;
counseling services, including rehabilitation counseling; and
orientation and mobility services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
State demand for fully credentialed special education, early
intervention, and related services personnel to serve children,
including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities, exceeds the
available supply, particularly in high-need schools \4\ (Boe et al.,
2013). These shortages can negatively affect the quality of services
provided to children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with
disabilities and their families (Boe et al., 2013). These shortages
limit the field's ability to ensure that each child has the opportunity
to meet challenging objectives and receive an individualized education
program that is both meaningful and appropriately ambitious, which is
essential for preparing them for the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-need school''
refers to a public elementary or secondary school that is a ``high-
need local educational agency (LEA),'' ``high-poverty,''
``implementing a comprehensive support and improvement plan,'' or
``implementing a targeted support and improvement plan'' as defined
in footnotes 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The need for personnel with the knowledge and skills to serve
children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who
have high-intensity needs, is even greater because specialized or
advanced preparation is
[[Page 17558]]
required to collaboratively design and deliver evidence-based \5\
instruction and intensive individualized intervention(s) in natural
environments, classrooms, and schools that address the needs of these
individuals (Boe et al., 2013; Browder et al., 2014; McLeskey &
Brownell, 2015). Although children, including infants and toddlers, and
youth with disabilities who have high-intensity needs may require the
combined expertise of numerous professionals (including special
education, early intervention, and related services providers), it is
often difficult for personnel from varied professional backgrounds to
work together because they lack shared information, understanding, and
experience.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For the purposes of this priority, ``evidence-based'' means,
at a minimum, evidence that demonstrates a rationale (as defined in
34 CFR 77.1), where a key project component included in the
project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation findings
that suggest the project component is likely to improve relevant
outcomes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interdisciplinary approaches to personnel preparation provide
scholars with experience working and learning in team environments
similar to those in which they are likely to work once employed (Smith,
2010). That is, when providing early intervention or special education
services under the IDEA, personnel serving children, including infants
and toddlers, and youth with disabilities work on interdisciplinary
teams with parents, general and special education teachers, early
interventionists, and related service providers with the expertise to
design, implement, and evaluate instruction, intervention plans,
individualized family service plans, and individualized education
programs based on the unique learning and developmental needs of each
child. To enable personnel to provide efficient, high-quality
integrated services, personnel preparation programs need to embed
content, practices, and field experience into preservice training that
is aligned with the interdisciplinary team-based approaches in which
graduates are likely to work. This priority aims to fund
interdisciplinary projects that will provide such preparation.
The projects must be awarded and operated in a manner consistent
with nondiscrimination requirements contained in the U.S. Constitution
and the Federal civil rights laws.
Priority:
The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve
the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children,
including infants and toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have
high-intensity needs--especially in areas of chronic personnel
shortage. The priority will fund high-quality interdisciplinary
projects that prepare special education, early intervention, and
related services personnel at the master's degree, educational
specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree levels for professional
practice in natural environments, early learning programs, classrooms,
and school settings serving children, including infants and toddlers,
and youth with disabilities.
Specifically, an applicant must propose an interdisciplinary
project supporting scholars \6\ from two or more graduate degree
programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and one
or more related services; or (b) two or more related services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For the purposes of this priority, ``scholar'' is limited to
an individual who (a) is pursuing a master's, educational specialist
degree, or clinical doctoral graduate degree in special education,
early intervention, or related services (as defined in this notice);
(b) receives scholarship assistance as authorized under section 662
of IDEA (34 CFR 304.3(g)); (c) will be eligible for a license,
endorsement, or certification from a State or national credentialing
authority following completion of the graduate degree program
identified in the application; and (d) will be able to be employed
in a position that serves children with disabilities for either 51
percent of their time or case load. See https://pdp.ed.gov/OSEP/Home/Regulation for more information.
Scholars from each graduate degree program participating in the
proposed interdisciplinary project must receive scholar support and
be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements following
graduate degree program completion. Scholars from each graduate
degree program participating in this project must complete the
requirements of their unique graduate degree program and receive
different graduate degrees. Individuals pursuing degrees in general
education or early childhood education do not qualify as
``scholars'' eligible for scholarship assistance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An interdisciplinary project is a project that delivers core
content through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated
field experiences as part of two or more master's degree, educational
specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree programs for scholars.
Not all requirements (e.g., courses and field experiences) of each
participating graduate degree program must be shared across all degree
programs participating in the interdisciplinary project, but the
interdisciplinary project must: (a) Identify the competencies needed to
promote high expectations and address the individualized needs of
children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs using an
interdisciplinary approach to service delivery; (b) outline how the
project will build capacity in those areas through shared coursework,
group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for scholars
supported by the proposed project; and (c) identify the aspects of each
graduate degree program that are shared across all participating degree
programs and those that remain unique to each.
Projects may include individuals who are in degree programs (e.g.,
general education, early childhood education, administration) and who
are cooperating with, but not funded as scholars by, the applicant's
proposed interdisciplinary project. These individuals may participate
in the shared coursework, group assignments, coordinated field
experiences, and other opportunities required of scholars and funded by
the project (e.g., speaker series, monthly seminars) if doing so does
not diminish the benefit for project-funded scholars (e.g., by reducing
funds available for scholar support or limiting opportunities for
scholars to participate in project activities).
Personnel preparation degree programs that prepare all scholars to
be dually certified can qualify under this priority by partnering with
at least one additional graduate degree program in related services.
Personnel preparation programs that prepare individuals to be
educational interpreters for the deaf at the bachelor's degree level
can qualify under this priority and are exempted from (a) the
interdisciplinary requirement and (b) the requirement for two or more
graduate degree programs. All other priority requirements specified for
graduate programs will apply to the bachelor's program. While
interdisciplinary projects are not required for educational
interpreters, they are encouraged.
Focus Areas: Within this absolute priority, the Secretary intends
to support interdisciplinary projects under the following two focus
areas: (A) Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and
Preschool-Age Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs;
and (B) Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs.
Applicants must identify the specific focus area (i.e., A or B)
under which they are applying as part of the competition title on the
application cover sheet (SF 424, line 12). Applicants may not submit
the same proposal under more than one focus area. Applicants may submit
different proposals in different focus areas.
Focus Area A: Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and
Preschool-Age Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs.
This focus area is
[[Page 17559]]
for interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared
coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for
scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a)
Early intervention or early childhood special education and related
services for infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with
disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related
services to serve infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with
disabilities who have high-intensity needs.
Early intervention personnel are those who are prepared to provide
services to infants and toddlers with disabilities ages birth to three,
and early childhood personnel are those who are prepared to provide
services to children with disabilities ages three through five (and in
States where the age range is other than ages three through five, we
defer to the State's certification for early childhood special
education). In States where certification in early intervention is
combined with certification in early childhood special education,
applicants may propose a combined early intervention and early
childhood special education personnel preparation project under this
focus area.
Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications
from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).\7\ OSEP also
may fund out of rank order high-quality applications to ensure that
projects are funded across both Focus Area A and Focus Area B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For the purposes of this priority, ``Historically Black
College or University'' is as defined under section 322 of the
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Area B: Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. This focus area is for
interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared
coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences to
scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a)
Special education and related services for school-age children with
disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related
services to serve school-age children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs.
Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications
from HBCUs. OSEP also may fund out of rank order high-quality
applications to ensure that projects are funded across both Focus Area
A and Focus Area B.
Focus Areas A and B:
Applicants may use up to the first 12 months of the performance
period and up to $100,000 of the first budget period for planning
without enrolling scholars. Applicants must clearly provide sufficient
justification for requesting program planning time and include the
goals, objectives, and intended outcomes of program planning in year
one, a description of the proposed strategies and activities to be
supported, and a timeline for the work; such as--
(1) Outlining or updating coursework, group assignments, or
coordinated field experience needed to support interdisciplinary
preparation for special education, early intervention, or related
services personnel serving children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
(2) Building capacity (e.g., hiring of a field supervisor,
providing professional development for field supervisors, and training
for faculty);
(3) Purchasing needed resources (e.g., additional teaching supplies
or specialized equipment to enhance instruction); or
(4) Negotiating agreements with programs or schools to serve as
sites for coordinated field experience needed to support delivery of
the proposed interdisciplinary project.
Additional Federal funds may be requested for scholar support and
other grant activities occurring in year one of the project, provided
that the total request for year one does not exceed the maximum award
available for one budget period of 12 months (i.e., $250,000).
Note: Applicants proposing projects to develop, expand, or add a
new area of emphasis to special education, early intervention, or
related services programs must provide, in their applications,
information on how these new areas will be sustained once Federal
funding ends.
To be considered for funding under this absolute priority, all
program applicants must meet the application requirements contained in
this priority. All projects funded under this absolute priority also
must meet the programmatic and administrative requirements specified in
this priority.
Note: Applicants are required to meet the matching support for the
proposed project at 10 percent of the total amount of the grant as
specified in paragraph (d)(10) of the priority requirements for an
application to be reviewed and be considered eligible to receive an
award.
To meet the requirements of this priority an applicant must--
(a) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Significance,'' how--
(1) The project addresses national, State, regional, or district
shortages of personnel who are fully qualified to serve children with
disabilities, ages birth through 21, who have high-intensity needs. To
address this requirement, the applicant must--
(i) Present data on the quality of each special education, early
intervention, or related services personnel preparation degree program
participating in the project, in areas such as: The average amount of
time it takes for scholars to complete the program; the percentage of
program graduates who receive a license, endorsement, or certification
related to special education, related services, or early intervention
services; the percentage of program graduates finding employment
related to their preparation after graduation; the effectiveness of
program graduates in providing special education, early intervention,
or related services, which could include data on the learning and
developmental outcomes of children with disabilities they serve; the
percentage of program graduates who maintain employment for two or more
years in the area for which they were prepared; and the percentage of
employers who rate the preparation of scholars who complete their
degree program as adequate or higher; and
(ii) If available for the degree programs participating in the
proposed project, present data on the quality of their
interdisciplinary approaches to the preparation of special education,
early intervention, or related services personnel; and
Note: Data on the quality of a personnel preparation program should
be no older than five years prior to the start date of the project
proposed in the application. When reporting percentages, the
denominator (i.e., total number of scholars or program graduates) must
be provided.
(2) The project will increase the number of personnel who
demonstrate the competencies \8\ needed to--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ For the purposes of this priority, ``competencies'' means
what a person knows and can do--the knowledge, skills, and
dispositions necessary to effectively function in a role (National
Professional Development Center on Inclusion, 2011). These
competencies should ensure that personnel are able to use
challenging academic standards, child achievement and functional
standards, and assessments to improve instructional practices,
services, learning and developmental outcomes (e.g., academic,
social, emotional, behavioral), and college- and career-readiness of
children with disabilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Promote high expectations;
(ii) Differentiate instruction;
(iii) Provide intensive individualized instruction and
intervention(s); and
(iv) Collaborate with diverse stakeholders using an
interdisciplinary
[[Page 17560]]
team-based approach to address the individualized needs of children
with disabilities who have high-intensity needs, ages birth through 21,
and designed to achieve improvements in learning or developmental
outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral), or successful
transition to postsecondary education and the workforce. To address
this requirement, the applicant must--
(A) Identify the competencies that special education, early
intervention, or related services personnel need to--
(1) Promote high expectations;
(2) Differentiate instruction;
(3) Provide intensive individualized instruction and
intervention(s); and
(4) Collaborate with parents, families, and diverse stakeholders
using an interdisciplinary team-based approach designed to lead to
improved learning and developmental outcomes; ensure access to and
progress in academic achievement standards or alternate academic
achievement standards, as appropriate; lead to successful transition to
college and career for children with disabilities, including children
with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; and maximize the use
of effective technology, including assistive technology, to deliver
instruction, interventions, and services;
(B) Identify the competencies needed by members of
interdisciplinary teams to promote high expectations and improve early
childhood, educational, and employment outcomes for children with
disabilities who have high-intensity needs;
(C) Identify the competencies that personnel need to support
inclusion of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs
in the least restrictive and natural environments to the maximum extent
appropriate by intentionally promoting high expectations and
participation in learning and social activities to foster development,
learning, academic achievement, friendships with peers, and sense of
belonging;
(D) Identify how scholars will be prepared to develop, implement,
and evaluate evidence-based instruction and evidence-based
interventions that improve outcomes for children with disabilities who
have high-intensity needs in a variety of settings (e.g., natural
environments; public schools, including charter schools; private
schools, including parochial schools; and other nonpublic education
settings, including home education); and
(E) Provide a conceptual framework for the proposed
interdisciplinary personnel preparation project, including any
empirical support for project activities designed to promote the
acquisition of the identified competencies (see paragraph (a)(2) of the
requirements for this priority) needed by special education, early
intervention, or related services personnel, and how these competencies
relate to the proposed project;
(b) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Quality of project services,'' how the project--
(1) Will conduct its planning activities, if the applicant will use
any of the allowable first 12 months of the project period for
planning;
(2) Will recruit and retain high-quality scholars into each of the
graduate degree programs participating in the project and ensure equal
access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members
of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. To meet this
requirement, the applicant must describe--
(i) Criteria the applicant will use to identify high-quality
applicants for admission into each of the graduate degree programs
participating in the project;
(ii) Recruitment strategies the applicant will use to attract high-
quality applicants and any specific recruitment strategies targeting
high-quality applicants from traditionally underrepresented groups,
including individuals with disabilities; and
(iii) The approach, including mentoring, monitoring, and
accommodations, the applicant will use to support scholars to complete
their respective degree programs;
(3) Reflects current evidence-based practices, including practices
in the areas of literacy and numeracy development, assessment,
behavior, instructional practices, and inclusive strategies, as
appropriate, and is designed to prepare scholars in the identified
competencies. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe
how the project will--
(i) Incorporate current evidence-based practices (including
relevant research citations) that improve outcomes for children with
disabilities who have high-intensity needs into (a) the required
coursework and field experiences for each graduate degree program
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the
interdisciplinary portions of the project; and
(ii) Use evidence-based professional development practices for
adult learners to instruct scholars;
(4) Is of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration to prepare
scholars in the identified competencies. To address this requirement,
the applicant must describe how--
(i) The components of (a) each graduate degree program
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the
interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will support
scholars' acquisition and enhancement of the identified competencies;
(ii) The components of (a) each graduate degree program
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the
interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will be integrated
to allow scholars, in collaboration with other team members, to use
their knowledge and skills in designing, implementing, and evaluating
practices supported by evidence to address the learning and
developmental needs of children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
(iii) Scholars will be provided with ongoing guidance and feedback
during training; and
(iv) The proposed project will provide ongoing induction
opportunities and mentoring support to graduates of each graduate
degree program participating in the project;
(5) Will engage in meaningful and effective collaboration with
appropriate partners representing diverse stakeholders, including--
(i) High-need schools, which may include high-need local
educational agencies (LEAs),\9\ high-poverty schools,\10\ schools
identified for comprehensive support and improvement,\11\ and schools
[[Page 17561]]
implementing a targeted support and improvement plan \12\ for children
with disabilities; early childhood and early intervention programs
located within the geographic boundaries of a high-need LEA; and early
childhood and early intervention programs located within the
geographical boundaries of an LEA serving the highest percentage of
schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement or
implementing targeted support and improvement plans in the State. The
purpose of these partnerships is to provide field practice for scholars
aimed at developing the identified competencies as members of
interdisciplinary teams; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-need LEA'' means
an LEA (a) that serves not fewer than 10,000 children from families
with incomes below the poverty line; or (b) for which not less than
20 percent of the children are from families with incomes below the
poverty line.
\10\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-poverty school''
means a school in which at least 50 percent of students are from
low-income families as determined using one of the measures of
poverty specified under section 1113(a)(5) of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). For middle and
high schools, eligibility may be calculated on the basis of
comparable data from feeder schools. Eligibility as a high-poverty
school under this definition is determined on the basis of the most
currently available data.
\11\ For the purposes of this priority, ``school implementing a
comprehensive support and improvement plan'' means a school
identified for comprehensive support and improvement by a State
under section 1111(c)(4)(D) of the ESEA that includes (a) not less
than the lowest performing 5 percent of all schools in the State
receiving funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA; (b) all public
high schools in the State failing to graduate one third or more of
their students; and (c) public schools in the State described under
section 1111(d)(3)(A)(i)(II) of the ESEA.
\12\ For the purposes of this priority, ``school implementing a
targeted support and improvement plan'' means a school identified
for targeted support and improvement by a State that has developed
and is implementing a school-level targeted support and improvement
plan to improve student outcomes based on the indicators in the
statewide accountability system as defined in section 1111(d)(2) of
the ESEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Other personnel preparation programs on campus or at
partnering universities for the purpose of sharing resources,
supporting program development and delivery, and addressing personnel
shortages;
(6) Will use technology, as appropriate, to promote scholar
learning and professional practice, enhance the efficiency of the
project, collaborate with partners, and facilitate ongoing mentoring
and support for scholars;
(7) Will ensure that scholars understand how to use technology to
support student learning and students' use of educational and assistive
technology; and
(8) Will align with and use resources, as appropriate, available
through technical assistance centers, which may include centers funded
by the Department;
Note: Use the ``Find a Center or Grant'' link at https://osepideasthatwork.org for information about OSEP-funded technical
assistance centers.
(c) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under
``Quality of the project evaluation,'' how--
(1) The applicant will use comprehensive and appropriate
methodologies to evaluate how well the goals or objectives of the
proposed project have been met, including the project processes and
outcomes;
(2) The applicant will collect, analyze, and use data related to
specific and measurable goals, objectives, and outcomes of the project.
To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how--
(i) Scholar competencies and other project processes and outcomes
will be measured for formative evaluation purposes, including proposed
instruments, data collection methods, and possible analyses; and
(ii) It will collect and analyze data on the quality of services
provided by scholars who complete the graduate degree programs involved
in this interdisciplinary project and are employed in the field for
which they were trained, including data on the learning and
developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral,
meeting college- and career-ready standards), and on growth toward
these outcomes, of the children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
Note: Following the completion of the project period, grantees are
encouraged to engage in ongoing data collection activities.
(3) The methods of evaluation will produce quantitative and
qualitative data for objective performance measures that are related to
the outcomes of the proposed project; and
(4) The methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and
allow for periodic assessment of progress towards meeting the project
outcomes. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe
how--
(i) Results of the evaluation will be used as a basis for improving
the proposed project to prepare special education, early intervention,
or related services personnel to provide (a) focused instruction; and
(b) intensive individualized intervention(s) in an interdisciplinary
team-based approach to improve outcomes of children with disabilities
who have high-intensity needs; and
(ii) The grantee will report the evaluation results to OSEP in its
annual and final performance reports;
(d) Demonstrate, in the narrative under ``Project Assurances'' or
in the applicable appendices, that the following program requirements
are met. The applicant must--
(1) Provide scholar support for participants from two or more
graduate degree programs partnering in the proposed interdisciplinary
personnel preparation project. Consistent with 34 CFR 304.30, each
scholar must (a) receive support for no less than one academic year,
and (b) be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements
following degree program completion. Funding across degree programs may
be applied differently;
(2) Include in Appendix B of the application--
(i) Table(s) that summarize the required program of study for each
degree program and that clearly delineate the shared coursework, group
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required of all project
scholars to support interdisciplinary practice;
(ii) Course syllabi for all coursework in the major of each degree
program and all shared courses, group assignments, and coordinated
field experiences required of project scholars; and
(iii) Learning outcomes for proposed coursework;
(3) Ensure that a comprehensive set of completed syllabi, including
syllabi created or revised as part of a project planning year, are
submitted to OSEP by the end of year one of the grant;
(4) Ensure scholars will not be selected based on race, ethnicity,
or national origin. Per the Supreme Court's decision in Adarand
Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), the Department does
not allow the selection of individuals on the basis of race, ethnicity,
or national origin. For this reason, grantees must ensure that any
discussion of the recruitment of scholars based on race, ethnicity, or
national origin distinguishes between increasing the pool of applicants
and actually selecting scholars;
(5) Ensure that the project will meet all requirements in 34 CFR
304.23, particularly those related to (a) informing all scholarship
recipients of their service obligation commitment and (b) disbursing
scholar support. Failure by a grantee to properly meet these
requirements would be a violation of the grant award that could result
in sanctions, including the grantee being liable for returning any
misused funds to the Department;
(6) Ensure that prior approval from the OSEP project officer will
be obtained before admitting additional scholars beyond the number of
scholars proposed in the application and before transferring a scholar
to another OSEP-funded grant;
(7) Ensure that the project will meet the statutory requirements in
section 662(e) through (h) of IDEA;
(8) Ensure that at least 65 percent of the total award over the
project period (i.e., up to 5 years) will be used for scholar support.
Applicants proposing to use year one for program development may budget
for less than 65 percent of the total requested budget over the 5 years
for scholar support;
[[Page 17562]]
such applicants must ensure that 65 percent of the total award minus
funds allocated for program development will be used for scholar
support;
(9) Ensure that the institution of higher education (IHE) at which
scholars are enrolled in the program will not require those scholars to
work (e.g., as graduate assistants) as a condition of receiving support
(e.g., tuition, stipends) from the proposed project, unless the work is
specifically related to the acquisition of scholars' competencies or
the requirements for completion of their personnel preparation program.
This prohibition on work as a condition of receiving support does not
apply to the service obligation requirements in section 662(h) of IDEA;
(10) Demonstrate, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and
budget narrative, matching support for the proposed project at 10
percent of the total amount of the grant. Applicants must propose the
amount of cash or in-kind resources;
Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this
program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference
between a grantee's negotiated indirect cost rate and the 8 percent
limit cannot be used to meet this absolute priority.
Matching support can be either cash or in-kind donations. Under 2
CFR 200.306, a cash expenditure or outlay of cash with respect to the
matching budget by the grantee is considered a cash contribution.
Certain cash contributions that the organization normally considers an
indirect cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes
of meeting matching support. Unrecovered indirect costs cannot be used
to meet the non-Federal matching support. Under 2 CFR 200.434, third-
party in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land,
buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a
non-Federal third party at no charge to the grantee.
To the maximum extent possible, OSEP encourages matching support be
used toward scholar support.
(11) Ensure that the budget includes attendance of the project
director at a three-day project directors' meeting in Washington, DC,
during each year of the project;
(12) Ensure that the project director, key personnel, and, as
appropriate, scholars will actively participate in the cross-project
collaboration, advanced trainings, and cross-site learning
opportunities (e.g., webinars, briefings) organized by OSEP. This
partnership will be used to build capacity of participants, increase
the impact of funding, and promote innovative and interdisciplinary
service delivery models across projects;
(13) Ensure that if the project maintains a website, relevant
information and documents are in a format that meets government or
industry-recognized standards for accessibility; and
(14) Ensure that annual data will be submitted on each scholar who
receives grant support (OMB Control Number 1820-0686). The primary
purposes of the data collection are to track the service obligation
fulfillment of scholars who receive funds from OSEP grants and to
collect data for program performance measure reporting under the
Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRA).
Applicants are encouraged to visit the Personnel Development Program
Data Collection System (DCS) website at https://pdp.ed.gov/osep for
further information about this data collection requirement. Typically,
data collection begins in January of each year, and grantees are
notified by email about the data collection period for their grant,
although grantees may submit data as needed, year round. This data
collection must be submitted electronically by the grantee and does not
supplant the annual grant performance report required of each grantee
for continuation funding (see 34 CFR 75.590). Data collection includes
the submission of a signed, completed Pre-Scholarship Agreement and
Exit Certification for each scholar funded under an OSEP grant (see
paragraph (5) of this section).
Competitive Preference Priorities: Within this absolute priority,
we give competitive preference to applications that address the
following priorities.
In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), Competitive Preference
Priority 1 is from allowable activities specified in the statute (see
sections 662 and 681 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481)).
Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Department's
Administrative Priorities for Discretionary Grant Programs published in
the Federal Register on March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative
Priorities).
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points
to an application, depending on how well the application meets
Competitive Preference Priority 1, and an additional 7 points to an
application that meets Competitive Preference Priority 2. Applicants
should indicate in the abstract which, if any, competitive preference
priorities are addressed.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1 (0 to 5 points).
Applicants that demonstrate matching support \13\ for the proposed
project at--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For the purposes of this priority, matching support can be
either cash or in-kind donations. According to 2 CFR 200.306, a cash
expenditure or an outlay of cash with respect to the matching budget
by the grantee is considered a cash contribution. Certain cash
contributions that the organization normally considers an indirect
cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes of
meeting matching support. According to 2 CFR 200.434, third-party
in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land,
buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a
non-Federal third-party at no charge to the grantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 20 percent of the total amount of the grant (2 points);
(ii) 30 percent of the total amount of the grant (3 points);
(iii) 40 percent of the total amount of the grant (4 points); or
(iv) 50 percent of the total amount of the grant (5 points).
Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this
program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference
between an applicant's negotiated indirect cost rate (e.g., 40 percent)
and the 8 percent limit cannot be used to meet any portion of the
competitive preference priority.
Note: Applicants must address this competitive preference priority,
if applicable, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and the
budget narrative. The applicant must propose the amount of cash or in-
kind resources to be contributed for each year of the grant.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Applications from New Potential
Grantees (0 or 7 points).
(a) Under this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that the
applicant has not had an active discretionary grant under the program
from which it seeks funds, including through membership in a group
application submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, five
years before the deadline date for submission of applications under the
program.
(b) For the purpose of this priority, a grant or contract is active
until the end of the grant's or contract's project or funding period,
including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee's or
contractor's authority to obligate funds.
References
Boe, E. E., deBettencourt, L., Dewey, J. F., Rosenberg, M. S.,
Sindelar, P. T., & Leko, C. D. (2013). Variability in demand for
special education teachers: Indicators, explanations, and impacts.
Exceptionality, 21(2), 103-125.
[[Page 17563]]
Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., & Ribuffo, C. (2014).
Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities
(Document No. IC-3). https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tool/innovation-configurations/.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq.
(2004).
McLeskey, J., & Brownell, M. (2015). High-leverage practices and
teacher preparation in special education (Document No. PR-1). https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/High-Leverage-Practices-and-Teacher-Preparation-in-Special-Education.pdf.
National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (August,
2011). Competencies for early childhood educators in the context of
inclusion: Issues and guidance for States. The University of North
Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
Smith, J. (2010). An interdisciplinary approach to preparing early
intervention professionals: A university and community collaborative
initiative. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(2), 131-142.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested
parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Section
681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment requirements of the
APA inapplicable to the absolute priority and Competitive Preference
Priority 1 in this notice.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 304. (e)
The Administrative Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $1,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2021 from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $200,000-$250,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $225,000.
Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $250,000 for a
single budget period of 12 months.
Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs and private nonprofit organizations.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Cost sharing or matching is required
for this competition. See the absolute priority.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application. Under 34 CFR 75.708(e), a grantee may
contract for supplies, equipment, and other services in accordance with
2 CFR part 200.
4. Other General Requirements: (a) Recipients of funding under this
competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in
employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of
IDEA).
(b) Applicants for, and recipients of, funding must, with respect
to the aspects of their proposed project relating to the absolute
priority, involve individuals with disabilities, or parents of
individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26, in planning,
implementing, and evaluating the project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of
IDEA).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this
competition.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of
the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend
that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages
and (2) use the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, reference citations, and captions, as well as
all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, and screen shots.
Use a font that is 12 point or larger.
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover
sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the
abstract (follow the guidance provided in the application package for
completing the abstract), the table of contents, the list of priority
requirements, the resumes, the reference list, the letters of support,
or the appendices. However, the recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative, including all text in charts, tables,
figures, graphs, and screen shots.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are as follows:
(a) Significance (10 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project will prepare personnel
for fields in which shortages have been demonstrated; and
(ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely
to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in
teaching and student achievement.
(b) Quality of project services (45 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be
provided by the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the
[[Page 17564]]
quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and
treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups
that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In determining the quality of the project services, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and effective
practice;
(ii) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services;
(iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for
maximizing the effectiveness of project services; and
(iv) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a
coherent, sustained program of training in the field.
(c) Quality of the project evaluation (25 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project;
(ii) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable;
(iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and
qualitative data to the extent possible; and
(iv) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward
achieving intended outcomes.
(d) Quality of project personnel, quality of the management plan,
and adequacy of resources (20 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the project personnel,
the quality of the management plan, and the adequacy of resources for
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel;
(ii) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks;
(iii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project;
(iv) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment,
supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the
lead applicant organization; and
(v) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past,
the Department has had difficulty finding peer reviewers for certain
competitions because so many individuals who are eligible to serve as
peer reviewers have conflicts of interest. The standing panel
requirements under section 682(b) of IDEA also have placed additional
constraints on the availability of reviewers. Therefore, the Department
has determined that for some discretionary grant competitions,
applications may be separated into two or more groups and ranked and
selected for funding within specific groups. This procedure will make
it easier for the Department to find peer reviewers by ensuring that
greater numbers of individuals who are eligible to serve as reviewers
for any particular group of applicants will not have conflicts of
interest. It also will increase the quality, independence, and fairness
of the review process, while permitting panel members to review
applications under discretionary grant competitions for which they also
have submitted applications.
4. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
5. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
[[Page 17565]]
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must
have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This
dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
5. Performance Measures: Under GPRA, the Department has established
a set of performance measures, including long-term measures, that are
designed to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness
and quality of the Personnel Development to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities program. These measures include:
(1) The percentage of preparation programs that incorporate
scientifically or evidence-based practices into their curricula; (2)
the percentage of scholars completing preparation programs who are
knowledgeable and skilled in evidence-based practices that improve
outcomes for children with disabilities; (3) the percentage of scholars
who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic
performance; (4) the percentage of scholars completing preparation
programs who are working in the area(s) in which they were prepared
upon program completion; and (5) the Federal cost per scholar who
completed the preparation program.
In addition, the Department will gather information on the
following outcome measures: (1) The percentage of scholars who
completed the preparation program and are employed in high-need
districts; (2) the percentage of scholars who completed the preparation
program and are employed in the field of special education for at least
two years; and (3) the percentage of scholars who completed the
preparation program and who are rated effective by their employers.
Grantees may be asked to participate in assessing and providing
information on these aspects of program quality.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. Delegated the
authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services.
[FR Doc. 2020-06522 Filed 3-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P