Applications for New Awards; Personnel Development To Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities-Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children With Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs, 17556-17565 [2020-06522]

Download as PDF 17556 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices 2019 (OMB# 1850–0645 v.11–12), while the submission describing all aspects of the field test and recruitment for the main study was approved in October 2019 (OMB# 1850–0645 v.13). This submission request is for all aspects of the PIRLS 2021 main study, including data collection activities, with an accompanying 30-day public comment period. After the international versions of the main study questionnaires are released by IEA in September 2020, a submission for the main study questionnaires with the proposed U.S. adaptations in Appendices C1 and C2 will be submitted in October 2020. In the case that the final approved U.S. adapted versions of the PIRLS 2021 main study questionnaires differ from those provided in that October 2020 submission, the final versions will be submitted to OMB for approval as a change request in December 2020. Dated: March 24, 2020. Stephanie Valentine, PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division, Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. [FR Doc. 2020–06485 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [Docket No. ED–2020–SCC–0054] Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Special Education—Individual Reporting on Regulatory Compliance Related to the Personnel Development Program’s Service Obligation and the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS), Department of Education (ED). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is proposing a revision of an existing information collection. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before May 29, 2020. ADDRESSES: To access and review all the documents related to the information collection listed in this notice, please use https://www.regulations.gov by searching the Docket ID number ED– 2020–SCC–0054. Comments submitted in response to this notice should be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov by selecting the lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 Docket ID number or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. If the regulations.gov site is not available to the public for any reason, ED will temporarily accept comments at ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the docket ID number and the title of the information collection request when requesting documents or submitting comments. Please note that comments submitted by fax or email and those submitted after the comment period will not be accepted. Written requests for information or comments submitted by postal mail or delivery should be addressed to the Director of the Strategic Collections and Clearance Governance and Strategy Division, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW, LBJ, Room 6W–208D, Washington, DC 20202–4537. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For specific questions related to collection activities, please contact Richelle Davis, 202–245–7401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Education (ED), in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department’s information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed information collection request (ICR) that is described below. The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) Is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. Title of Collection: Special Education—Individual Reporting on Regulatory Compliance Related to the Personnel Development Program’s Service Obligation and the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). OMB Control Number: 1820–0686. PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Type of Review: A revision of an existing information collection. Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals or Households. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 34,262. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 8,328. Abstract: The Office of Special Education Program’s Personnel Development Program aims to increase the supply of qualified personnel in the field of special education. The program awards competitive grants to Institutions of Higher Education to support scholars who are preparing to provide special education and related services to children and youth with disabilities. Scholars who receive funding agree to work in the field of special education or related services for two years for each year of support they receive. The Personnel Development Program Data Collection System collects data from grantees, scholars, and employers who verify that scholars are employed in the field of special education or related services. This data collection serves three program needs. First, data from grantees, scholars, and employers are necessary to assess the performance of the Personnel Development Program on its Government Performance Results Act measures. Second, data from all three sources are necessary to determine if scholars comply with the service obligation requirements. And finally, project-specific performance data are collected from grantees for project monitoring and program improvement. The forms in this package are updates to existing Office of Management and Budget approved forms (1820–0686) which expire on 8/31/2020. Dated: March 25, 2020. Kate Mullan, PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance Governance and Strategy Division, Office of Chief Data Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–06534 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Applications for New Awards; Personnel Development To Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities—Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children With Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Department of Education. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices ACTION: Notice. The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities— Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number 84.325K. This notice relates to the approved information collection under OMB control number 1820–0028. DATES: Applications Available: March 30, 2020. Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 29, 2020. Pre-Application Webinar Information: No later than April 6, 2020, the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) will post a pre-recorded informational webinar designed to provide technical assistance to interested applicants. The webinar may be found at www2.ed.gov/ fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osepgrants.html. Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 28, 2020. ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Focus Area A: Sunyoung Ahn, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5012A, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202– 5076. Telephone: (202) 245–6460. Email: Sunyoung.Ahn@ed.gov. For Focus Area B: LaTisha Putney, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5060D, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–5076. Telephone: (202) 245– 6172. Email: LaTisha.Putney@ed.gov. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877– 8339. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: Full Text of Announcement I. Funding Opportunity Description Purpose of Program: The purposes of this program are to (1) help address State-identified needs for personnel VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 preparation in special education, early intervention, related services, and regular education to work with children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities; and (2) ensure that those personnel have the necessary skills and knowledge, derived from practices that have been determined through scientifically based research, to be successful in serving those children. Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this absolute priority is from allowable activities specified in the statute (see sections 662 and 681 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481)). Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority. This priority is: Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. Background: The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs,1 especially in areas of chronic personnel shortage. Under this priority, the Department will fund highquality interdisciplinary 2 projects that 1 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-intensity needs’’ refers to a complex array of disabilities (e.g., multiple disabilities, significant cognitive disabilities, significant physical disabilities, significant sensory disabilities, significant autism, significant emotional disabilities, or significant learning disabilities, including dyslexia) or the needs of children with these disabilities requiring intensive, individualized intervention(s) (i.e., that are specifically designed to address persistent learning or behavior difficulties, implemented with greater frequency and for an extended duration than is commonly available in a typical classroom or early intervention setting, or which require personnel to have knowledge and skills in identifying and implementing multiple evidencebased interventions). 2 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘interdisciplinary’’ refers to preparing scholars from two or more graduate degree programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and one or more related services through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences; or (b) two or more related services through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences. Different graduate degree programs across more than one institution of higher education may partner to develop an interdisciplinary project. For the purpose of this priority, ‘‘interdisciplinary’’ does not include: (a) Individual scholars who receive two or more graduate degrees; PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17557 prepare special education, early intervention, and related services 3 personnel at the master’s degree, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree levels for professional practice in a variety of education settings, including natural environments (the home and community settings in which children with and without disabilities participate), early learning programs, classrooms, and school settings. The competition will also prepare personnel who have the knowledge and skills to support each child with a disability in meeting high expectations and to partner with other providers, families, and administrators in meaningful and effective collaborations. State demand for fully credentialed special education, early intervention, and related services personnel to serve children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities, exceeds the available supply, particularly in highneed schools 4 (Boe et al., 2013). These shortages can negatively affect the quality of services provided to children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities and their families (Boe et al., 2013). These shortages limit the field’s ability to ensure that each child has the opportunity to meet challenging objectives and receive an individualized education program that is both meaningful and appropriately ambitious, which is essential for preparing them for the future. The need for personnel with the knowledge and skills to serve children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs, is even greater because specialized or advanced preparation is (b) one graduate degree program that prepares scholars with different areas of focus; (c) one graduate degree program that offers interdisciplinary content but does not prepare scholars from two or more degree programs together; or (d) one graduate degree program in special education, early intervention, and related services partnering with a graduate degree program other than special education, early intervention, or related services. Programs in which scholars receive only a certificate or endorsement without a graduate degree are not eligible. 3 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘related services’’ includes the following: Speech-language pathology and audiology services; interpreting services; psychological services; applied behavior analysis; physical therapy and occupational therapy; recreation, including therapeutic recreation; social work services; counseling services, including rehabilitation counseling; and orientation and mobility services. 4 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-need school’’ refers to a public elementary or secondary school that is a ‘‘high-need local educational agency (LEA),’’ ‘‘high-poverty,’’ ‘‘implementing a comprehensive support and improvement plan,’’ or ‘‘implementing a targeted support and improvement plan’’ as defined in footnotes 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively. E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 17558 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices required to collaboratively design and deliver evidence-based 5 instruction and intensive individualized intervention(s) in natural environments, classrooms, and schools that address the needs of these individuals (Boe et al., 2013; Browder et al., 2014; McLeskey & Brownell, 2015). Although children, including infants and toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs may require the combined expertise of numerous professionals (including special education, early intervention, and related services providers), it is often difficult for personnel from varied professional backgrounds to work together because they lack shared information, understanding, and experience. Interdisciplinary approaches to personnel preparation provide scholars with experience working and learning in team environments similar to those in which they are likely to work once employed (Smith, 2010). That is, when providing early intervention or special education services under the IDEA, personnel serving children, including infants and toddlers, and youth with disabilities work on interdisciplinary teams with parents, general and special education teachers, early interventionists, and related service providers with the expertise to design, implement, and evaluate instruction, intervention plans, individualized family service plans, and individualized education programs based on the unique learning and developmental needs of each child. To enable personnel to provide efficient, high-quality integrated services, personnel preparation programs need to embed content, practices, and field experience into preservice training that is aligned with the interdisciplinary team-based approaches in which graduates are likely to work. This priority aims to fund interdisciplinary projects that will provide such preparation. The projects must be awarded and operated in a manner consistent with nondiscrimination requirements contained in the U.S. Constitution and the Federal civil rights laws. Priority: The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children, including infants and toddlers, and 5 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘evidencebased’’ means, at a minimum, evidence that demonstrates a rationale (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1), where a key project component included in the project’s logic model is informed by research or evaluation findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve relevant outcomes. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 youth with disabilities who have highintensity needs—especially in areas of chronic personnel shortage. The priority will fund high-quality interdisciplinary projects that prepare special education, early intervention, and related services personnel at the master’s degree, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree levels for professional practice in natural environments, early learning programs, classrooms, and school settings serving children, including infants and toddlers, and youth with disabilities. Specifically, an applicant must propose an interdisciplinary project supporting scholars 6 from two or more graduate degree programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and one or more related services; or (b) two or more related services. An interdisciplinary project is a project that delivers core content through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences as part of two or more master’s degree, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree programs for scholars. Not all requirements (e.g., courses and field experiences) of each participating graduate degree program must be shared across all degree programs participating in the interdisciplinary project, but the interdisciplinary project must: (a) Identify the competencies needed to promote high expectations and address the individualized needs of children with disabilities who have highintensity needs using an interdisciplinary approach to service delivery; (b) outline how the project will build capacity in those areas through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for 6 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘scholar’’ is limited to an individual who (a) is pursuing a master’s, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral graduate degree in special education, early intervention, or related services (as defined in this notice); (b) receives scholarship assistance as authorized under section 662 of IDEA (34 CFR 304.3(g)); (c) will be eligible for a license, endorsement, or certification from a State or national credentialing authority following completion of the graduate degree program identified in the application; and (d) will be able to be employed in a position that serves children with disabilities for either 51 percent of their time or case load. See https://pdp.ed.gov/OSEP/Home/ Regulation for more information. Scholars from each graduate degree program participating in the proposed interdisciplinary project must receive scholar support and be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements following graduate degree program completion. Scholars from each graduate degree program participating in this project must complete the requirements of their unique graduate degree program and receive different graduate degrees. Individuals pursuing degrees in general education or early childhood education do not qualify as ‘‘scholars’’ eligible for scholarship assistance. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 scholars supported by the proposed project; and (c) identify the aspects of each graduate degree program that are shared across all participating degree programs and those that remain unique to each. Projects may include individuals who are in degree programs (e.g., general education, early childhood education, administration) and who are cooperating with, but not funded as scholars by, the applicant’s proposed interdisciplinary project. These individuals may participate in the shared coursework, group assignments, coordinated field experiences, and other opportunities required of scholars and funded by the project (e.g., speaker series, monthly seminars) if doing so does not diminish the benefit for project-funded scholars (e.g., by reducing funds available for scholar support or limiting opportunities for scholars to participate in project activities). Personnel preparation degree programs that prepare all scholars to be dually certified can qualify under this priority by partnering with at least one additional graduate degree program in related services. Personnel preparation programs that prepare individuals to be educational interpreters for the deaf at the bachelor’s degree level can qualify under this priority and are exempted from (a) the interdisciplinary requirement and (b) the requirement for two or more graduate degree programs. All other priority requirements specified for graduate programs will apply to the bachelor’s program. While interdisciplinary projects are not required for educational interpreters, they are encouraged. Focus Areas: Within this absolute priority, the Secretary intends to support interdisciplinary projects under the following two focus areas: (A) Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and Preschool-Age Children with Disabilities who have HighIntensity Needs; and (B) Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with Disabilities who have HighIntensity Needs. Applicants must identify the specific focus area (i.e., A or B) under which they are applying as part of the competition title on the application cover sheet (SF 424, line 12). Applicants may not submit the same proposal under more than one focus area. Applicants may submit different proposals in different focus areas. Focus Area A: Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and PreschoolAge Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. This focus area is E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices for interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a) Early intervention or early childhood special education and related services for infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related services to serve infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with disabilities who have highintensity needs. Early intervention personnel are those who are prepared to provide services to infants and toddlers with disabilities ages birth to three, and early childhood personnel are those who are prepared to provide services to children with disabilities ages three through five (and in States where the age range is other than ages three through five, we defer to the State’s certification for early childhood special education). In States where certification in early intervention is combined with certification in early childhood special education, applicants may propose a combined early intervention and early childhood special education personnel preparation project under this focus area. Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).7 OSEP also may fund out of rank order high-quality applications to ensure that projects are funded across both Focus Area A and Focus Area B. Focus Area B: Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. This focus area is for interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences to scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a) Special education and related services for school-age children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related services to serve school-age children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs. Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications from HBCUs. OSEP also may fund out of rank order high-quality applications to ensure that projects are funded across both Focus Area A and Focus Area B. Focus Areas A and B: 7 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘Historically Black College or University’’ is as defined under section 322 of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 Applicants may use up to the first 12 months of the performance period and up to $100,000 of the first budget period for planning without enrolling scholars. Applicants must clearly provide sufficient justification for requesting program planning time and include the goals, objectives, and intended outcomes of program planning in year one, a description of the proposed strategies and activities to be supported, and a timeline for the work; such as— (1) Outlining or updating coursework, group assignments, or coordinated field experience needed to support interdisciplinary preparation for special education, early intervention, or related services personnel serving children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; (2) Building capacity (e.g., hiring of a field supervisor, providing professional development for field supervisors, and training for faculty); (3) Purchasing needed resources (e.g., additional teaching supplies or specialized equipment to enhance instruction); or (4) Negotiating agreements with programs or schools to serve as sites for coordinated field experience needed to support delivery of the proposed interdisciplinary project. Additional Federal funds may be requested for scholar support and other grant activities occurring in year one of the project, provided that the total request for year one does not exceed the maximum award available for one budget period of 12 months (i.e., $250,000). Note: Applicants proposing projects to develop, expand, or add a new area of emphasis to special education, early intervention, or related services programs must provide, in their applications, information on how these new areas will be sustained once Federal funding ends. To be considered for funding under this absolute priority, all program applicants must meet the application requirements contained in this priority. All projects funded under this absolute priority also must meet the programmatic and administrative requirements specified in this priority. Note: Applicants are required to meet the matching support for the proposed project at 10 percent of the total amount of the grant as specified in paragraph (d)(10) of the priority requirements for an application to be reviewed and be considered eligible to receive an award. To meet the requirements of this priority an applicant must— (a) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under ‘‘Significance,’’ how— PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17559 (1) The project addresses national, State, regional, or district shortages of personnel who are fully qualified to serve children with disabilities, ages birth through 21, who have highintensity needs. To address this requirement, the applicant must— (i) Present data on the quality of each special education, early intervention, or related services personnel preparation degree program participating in the project, in areas such as: The average amount of time it takes for scholars to complete the program; the percentage of program graduates who receive a license, endorsement, or certification related to special education, related services, or early intervention services; the percentage of program graduates finding employment related to their preparation after graduation; the effectiveness of program graduates in providing special education, early intervention, or related services, which could include data on the learning and developmental outcomes of children with disabilities they serve; the percentage of program graduates who maintain employment for two or more years in the area for which they were prepared; and the percentage of employers who rate the preparation of scholars who complete their degree program as adequate or higher; and (ii) If available for the degree programs participating in the proposed project, present data on the quality of their interdisciplinary approaches to the preparation of special education, early intervention, or related services personnel; and Note: Data on the quality of a personnel preparation program should be no older than five years prior to the start date of the project proposed in the application. When reporting percentages, the denominator (i.e., total number of scholars or program graduates) must be provided. (2) The project will increase the number of personnel who demonstrate the competencies 8 needed to— (i) Promote high expectations; (ii) Differentiate instruction; (iii) Provide intensive individualized instruction and intervention(s); and (iv) Collaborate with diverse stakeholders using an interdisciplinary 8 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘competencies’’ means what a person knows and can do—the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to effectively function in a role (National Professional Development Center on Inclusion, 2011). These competencies should ensure that personnel are able to use challenging academic standards, child achievement and functional standards, and assessments to improve instructional practices, services, learning and developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral), and college- and career-readiness of children with disabilities. E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 17560 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices team-based approach to address the individualized needs of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs, ages birth through 21, and designed to achieve improvements in learning or developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral), or successful transition to postsecondary education and the workforce. To address this requirement, the applicant must— (A) Identify the competencies that special education, early intervention, or related services personnel need to— (1) Promote high expectations; (2) Differentiate instruction; (3) Provide intensive individualized instruction and intervention(s); and (4) Collaborate with parents, families, and diverse stakeholders using an interdisciplinary team-based approach designed to lead to improved learning and developmental outcomes; ensure access to and progress in academic achievement standards or alternate academic achievement standards, as appropriate; lead to successful transition to college and career for children with disabilities, including children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; and maximize the use of effective technology, including assistive technology, to deliver instruction, interventions, and services; (B) Identify the competencies needed by members of interdisciplinary teams to promote high expectations and improve early childhood, educational, and employment outcomes for children with disabilities who have highintensity needs; (C) Identify the competencies that personnel need to support inclusion of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs in the least restrictive and natural environments to the maximum extent appropriate by intentionally promoting high expectations and participation in learning and social activities to foster development, learning, academic achievement, friendships with peers, and sense of belonging; (D) Identify how scholars will be prepared to develop, implement, and evaluate evidence-based instruction and evidence-based interventions that improve outcomes for children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs in a variety of settings (e.g., natural environments; public schools, including charter schools; private schools, including parochial schools; and other nonpublic education settings, including home education); and (E) Provide a conceptual framework for the proposed interdisciplinary personnel preparation project, including any empirical support for project VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 activities designed to promote the acquisition of the identified competencies (see paragraph (a)(2) of the requirements for this priority) needed by special education, early intervention, or related services personnel, and how these competencies relate to the proposed project; (b) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under ‘‘Quality of project services,’’ how the project— (1) Will conduct its planning activities, if the applicant will use any of the allowable first 12 months of the project period for planning; (2) Will recruit and retain high-quality scholars into each of the graduate degree programs participating in the project and ensure equal access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. To meet this requirement, the applicant must describe— (i) Criteria the applicant will use to identify high-quality applicants for admission into each of the graduate degree programs participating in the project; (ii) Recruitment strategies the applicant will use to attract high-quality applicants and any specific recruitment strategies targeting high-quality applicants from traditionally underrepresented groups, including individuals with disabilities; and (iii) The approach, including mentoring, monitoring, and accommodations, the applicant will use to support scholars to complete their respective degree programs; (3) Reflects current evidence-based practices, including practices in the areas of literacy and numeracy development, assessment, behavior, instructional practices, and inclusive strategies, as appropriate, and is designed to prepare scholars in the identified competencies. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how the project will— (i) Incorporate current evidence-based practices (including relevant research citations) that improve outcomes for children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs into (a) the required coursework and field experiences for each graduate degree program participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the interdisciplinary portions of the project; and PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (ii) Use evidence-based professional development practices for adult learners to instruct scholars; (4) Is of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration to prepare scholars in the identified competencies. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how— (i) The components of (a) each graduate degree program participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will support scholars’ acquisition and enhancement of the identified competencies; (ii) The components of (a) each graduate degree program participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will be integrated to allow scholars, in collaboration with other team members, to use their knowledge and skills in designing, implementing, and evaluating practices supported by evidence to address the learning and developmental needs of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; (iii) Scholars will be provided with ongoing guidance and feedback during training; and (iv) The proposed project will provide ongoing induction opportunities and mentoring support to graduates of each graduate degree program participating in the project; (5) Will engage in meaningful and effective collaboration with appropriate partners representing diverse stakeholders, including— (i) High-need schools, which may include high-need local educational agencies (LEAs),9 high-poverty schools,10 schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement,11 and schools 9 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-need LEA’’ means an LEA (a) that serves not fewer than 10,000 children from families with incomes below the poverty line; or (b) for which not less than 20 percent of the children are from families with incomes below the poverty line. 10 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘high-poverty school’’ means a school in which at least 50 percent of students are from low-income families as determined using one of the measures of poverty specified under section 1113(a)(5) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). For middle and high schools, eligibility may be calculated on the basis of comparable data from feeder schools. Eligibility as a high-poverty school under this definition is determined on the basis of the most currently available data. 11 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘school implementing a comprehensive support and improvement plan’’ means a school identified for comprehensive support and improvement by a State under section 1111(c)(4)(D) of the ESEA that E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES implementing a targeted support and improvement plan 12 for children with disabilities; early childhood and early intervention programs located within the geographic boundaries of a highneed LEA; and early childhood and early intervention programs located within the geographical boundaries of an LEA serving the highest percentage of schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement or implementing targeted support and improvement plans in the State. The purpose of these partnerships is to provide field practice for scholars aimed at developing the identified competencies as members of interdisciplinary teams; and (ii) Other personnel preparation programs on campus or at partnering universities for the purpose of sharing resources, supporting program development and delivery, and addressing personnel shortages; (6) Will use technology, as appropriate, to promote scholar learning and professional practice, enhance the efficiency of the project, collaborate with partners, and facilitate ongoing mentoring and support for scholars; (7) Will ensure that scholars understand how to use technology to support student learning and students’ use of educational and assistive technology; and (8) Will align with and use resources, as appropriate, available through technical assistance centers, which may include centers funded by the Department; Note: Use the ‘‘Find a Center or Grant’’ link at https:// osepideasthatwork.org for information about OSEP-funded technical assistance centers. (c) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under ‘‘Quality of the project evaluation,’’ how— (1) The applicant will use comprehensive and appropriate methodologies to evaluate how well the goals or objectives of the proposed project have been met, including the project processes and outcomes; includes (a) not less than the lowest performing 5 percent of all schools in the State receiving funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA; (b) all public high schools in the State failing to graduate one third or more of their students; and (c) public schools in the State described under section 1111(d)(3)(A)(i)(II) of the ESEA. 12 For the purposes of this priority, ‘‘school implementing a targeted support and improvement plan’’ means a school identified for targeted support and improvement by a State that has developed and is implementing a school-level targeted support and improvement plan to improve student outcomes based on the indicators in the statewide accountability system as defined in section 1111(d)(2) of the ESEA. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 (2) The applicant will collect, analyze, and use data related to specific and measurable goals, objectives, and outcomes of the project. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how— (i) Scholar competencies and other project processes and outcomes will be measured for formative evaluation purposes, including proposed instruments, data collection methods, and possible analyses; and (ii) It will collect and analyze data on the quality of services provided by scholars who complete the graduate degree programs involved in this interdisciplinary project and are employed in the field for which they were trained, including data on the learning and developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral, meeting college- and careerready standards), and on growth toward these outcomes, of the children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; Note: Following the completion of the project period, grantees are encouraged to engage in ongoing data collection activities. (3) The methods of evaluation will produce quantitative and qualitative data for objective performance measures that are related to the outcomes of the proposed project; and (4) The methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and allow for periodic assessment of progress towards meeting the project outcomes. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how— (i) Results of the evaluation will be used as a basis for improving the proposed project to prepare special education, early intervention, or related services personnel to provide (a) focused instruction; and (b) intensive individualized intervention(s) in an interdisciplinary team-based approach to improve outcomes of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; and (ii) The grantee will report the evaluation results to OSEP in its annual and final performance reports; (d) Demonstrate, in the narrative under ‘‘Project Assurances’’ or in the applicable appendices, that the following program requirements are met. The applicant must— (1) Provide scholar support for participants from two or more graduate degree programs partnering in the proposed interdisciplinary personnel preparation project. Consistent with 34 CFR 304.30, each scholar must (a) receive support for no less than one academic year, and (b) be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17561 following degree program completion. Funding across degree programs may be applied differently; (2) Include in Appendix B of the application— (i) Table(s) that summarize the required program of study for each degree program and that clearly delineate the shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences required of all project scholars to support interdisciplinary practice; (ii) Course syllabi for all coursework in the major of each degree program and all shared courses, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences required of project scholars; and (iii) Learning outcomes for proposed coursework; (3) Ensure that a comprehensive set of completed syllabi, including syllabi created or revised as part of a project planning year, are submitted to OSEP by the end of year one of the grant; (4) Ensure scholars will not be selected based on race, ethnicity, or national origin. Per the Supreme Court’s decision in Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), the Department does not allow the selection of individuals on the basis of race, ethnicity, or national origin. For this reason, grantees must ensure that any discussion of the recruitment of scholars based on race, ethnicity, or national origin distinguishes between increasing the pool of applicants and actually selecting scholars; (5) Ensure that the project will meet all requirements in 34 CFR 304.23, particularly those related to (a) informing all scholarship recipients of their service obligation commitment and (b) disbursing scholar support. Failure by a grantee to properly meet these requirements would be a violation of the grant award that could result in sanctions, including the grantee being liable for returning any misused funds to the Department; (6) Ensure that prior approval from the OSEP project officer will be obtained before admitting additional scholars beyond the number of scholars proposed in the application and before transferring a scholar to another OSEPfunded grant; (7) Ensure that the project will meet the statutory requirements in section 662(e) through (h) of IDEA; (8) Ensure that at least 65 percent of the total award over the project period (i.e., up to 5 years) will be used for scholar support. Applicants proposing to use year one for program development may budget for less than 65 percent of the total requested budget over the 5 years for scholar support; E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 17562 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices such applicants must ensure that 65 percent of the total award minus funds allocated for program development will be used for scholar support; (9) Ensure that the institution of higher education (IHE) at which scholars are enrolled in the program will not require those scholars to work (e.g., as graduate assistants) as a condition of receiving support (e.g., tuition, stipends) from the proposed project, unless the work is specifically related to the acquisition of scholars’ competencies or the requirements for completion of their personnel preparation program. This prohibition on work as a condition of receiving support does not apply to the service obligation requirements in section 662(h) of IDEA; (10) Demonstrate, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and budget narrative, matching support for the proposed project at 10 percent of the total amount of the grant. Applicants must propose the amount of cash or inkind resources; Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference between a grantee’s negotiated indirect cost rate and the 8 percent limit cannot be used to meet this absolute priority. Matching support can be either cash or in-kind donations. Under 2 CFR 200.306, a cash expenditure or outlay of cash with respect to the matching budget by the grantee is considered a cash contribution. Certain cash contributions that the organization normally considers an indirect cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes of meeting matching support. Unrecovered indirect costs cannot be used to meet the non-Federal matching support. Under 2 CFR 200.434, third-party in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land, buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a non-Federal third party at no charge to the grantee. To the maximum extent possible, OSEP encourages matching support be used toward scholar support. (11) Ensure that the budget includes attendance of the project director at a three-day project directors’ meeting in Washington, DC, during each year of the project; (12) Ensure that the project director, key personnel, and, as appropriate, scholars will actively participate in the cross-project collaboration, advanced trainings, and cross-site learning opportunities (e.g., webinars, briefings) organized by OSEP. This partnership will be used to build capacity of VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 participants, increase the impact of funding, and promote innovative and interdisciplinary service delivery models across projects; (13) Ensure that if the project maintains a website, relevant information and documents are in a format that meets government or industry-recognized standards for accessibility; and (14) Ensure that annual data will be submitted on each scholar who receives grant support (OMB Control Number 1820–0686). The primary purposes of the data collection are to track the service obligation fulfillment of scholars who receive funds from OSEP grants and to collect data for program performance measure reporting under the Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRA). Applicants are encouraged to visit the Personnel Development Program Data Collection System (DCS) website at https://pdp.ed.gov/osep for further information about this data collection requirement. Typically, data collection begins in January of each year, and grantees are notified by email about the data collection period for their grant, although grantees may submit data as needed, year round. This data collection must be submitted electronically by the grantee and does not supplant the annual grant performance report required of each grantee for continuation funding (see 34 CFR 75.590). Data collection includes the submission of a signed, completed Pre-Scholarship Agreement and Exit Certification for each scholar funded under an OSEP grant (see paragraph (5) of this section). Competitive Preference Priorities: Within this absolute priority, we give competitive preference to applications that address the following priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), Competitive Preference Priority 1 is from allowable activities specified in the statute (see sections 662 and 681 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481)). Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Department’s Administrative Priorities for Discretionary Grant Programs published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative Priorities). Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points to an application, depending on how well the application meets Competitive Preference Priority 1, and an additional 7 points to an application that meets Competitive Preference Priority 2. Applicants should indicate in the abstract which, if any, competitive preference priorities are addressed. PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 These priorities are: Competitive Preference Priority 1 (0 to 5 points). Applicants that demonstrate matching support 13 for the proposed project at— (i) 20 percent of the total amount of the grant (2 points); (ii) 30 percent of the total amount of the grant (3 points); (iii) 40 percent of the total amount of the grant (4 points); or (iv) 50 percent of the total amount of the grant (5 points). Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference between an applicant’s negotiated indirect cost rate (e.g., 40 percent) and the 8 percent limit cannot be used to meet any portion of the competitive preference priority. Note: Applicants must address this competitive preference priority, if applicable, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and the budget narrative. The applicant must propose the amount of cash or in-kind resources to be contributed for each year of the grant. Competitive Preference Priority 2— Applications from New Potential Grantees (0 or 7 points). (a) Under this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that the applicant has not had an active discretionary grant under the program from which it seeks funds, including through membership in a group application submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127–75.129, five years before the deadline date for submission of applications under the program. (b) For the purpose of this priority, a grant or contract is active until the end of the grant’s or contract’s project or funding period, including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee’s or contractor’s authority to obligate funds. References Boe, E. E., deBettencourt, L., Dewey, J. F., Rosenberg, M. S., Sindelar, P. T., & Leko, C. D. (2013). Variability in demand for special education teachers: Indicators, explanations, and impacts. Exceptionality, 21(2), 103–125. 13 For the purposes of this priority, matching support can be either cash or in-kind donations. According to 2 CFR 200.306, a cash expenditure or an outlay of cash with respect to the matching budget by the grantee is considered a cash contribution. Certain cash contributions that the organization normally considers an indirect cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes of meeting matching support. According to 2 CFR 200.434, third-party in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land, buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a non-Federal third-party at no charge to the grantee. E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., & Ribuffo, C. (2014). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities (Document No. IC–3). https:// ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tool/ innovation-configurations/. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq. (2004). McLeskey, J., & Brownell, M. (2015). Highleverage practices and teacher preparation in special education (Document No. PR–1). https:// ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/ uploads/2016/05/High-LeveragePractices-and-Teacher-Preparation-inSpecial-Education.pdf. National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (August, 2011). Competencies for early childhood educators in the context of inclusion: Issues and guidance for States. The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. Smith, J. (2010). An interdisciplinary approach to preparing early intervention professionals: A university and community collaborative initiative. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(2), 131–142. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Section 681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment requirements of the APA inapplicable to the absolute priority and Competitive Preference Priority 1 in this notice. Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481. Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 304. (e) The Administrative Priorities. lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only. II. Award Information Type of Award: Discretionary grants. Estimated Available Funds: $1,000,000. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make additional awards in FY VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 2021 from the list of unfunded applications from this competition. Estimated Range of Awards: $200,000–$250,000. Estimated Average Size of Awards: $225,000. Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $250,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. Estimated Number of Awards: 4. Project Period: Up to 60 months. Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice. III. Eligibility Information 1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs and private nonprofit organizations. 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Cost sharing or matching is required for this competition. See the absolute priority. 3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities described in its application. Under 34 CFR 75.708(e), a grantee may contract for supplies, equipment, and other services in accordance with 2 CFR part 200. 4. Other General Requirements: (a) Recipients of funding under this competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of IDEA). (b) Applicants for, and recipients of, funding must, with respect to the aspects of their proposed project relating to the absolute priority, involve individuals with disabilities, or parents of individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26, in planning, implementing, and evaluating the project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of IDEA). IV. Application and Submission Information 1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which contain requirements and information on how to submit an application. 2. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this competition. 3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17563 restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. 4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages and (2) use the following standards: • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom, and both sides. • Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, reference citations, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, and screen shots. • Use a font that is 12 point or larger. • Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the abstract (follow the guidance provided in the application package for completing the abstract), the table of contents, the list of priority requirements, the resumes, the reference list, the letters of support, or the appendices. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the application narrative, including all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, and screen shots. V. Application Review Information 1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are as follows: (a) Significance (10 points). (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project. (2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The extent to which the proposed project will prepare personnel for fields in which shortages have been demonstrated; and (ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in teaching and student achievement. (b) Quality of project services (45 points). (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed project. (2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed project, the Secretary considers the E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES 17564 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. (3) In determining the quality of the project services, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice; (ii) The extent to which the training or professional development services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice among the recipients of those services; (iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for maximizing the effectiveness of project services; and (iv) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a coherent, sustained program of training in the field. (c) Quality of the project evaluation (25 points). (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be conducted of the proposed project. (2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed project; (ii) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable; (iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and qualitative data to the extent possible; and (iv) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended outcomes. (d) Quality of project personnel, quality of the management plan, and adequacy of resources (20 points). (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the project personnel, the quality of the management plan, and the adequacy of resources for the proposed project. (2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary considers the extent to which the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 applicant encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors: (i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of key project personnel; (ii) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks; (iii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project; (iv) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the lead applicant organization; and (v) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project. 2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the applicant’s use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable quality. In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). 3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past, the Department has had difficulty finding peer reviewers for certain competitions because so many individuals who are eligible to serve as peer reviewers have conflicts of interest. The standing panel requirements under section 682(b) of IDEA also have placed additional constraints on the availability of reviewers. Therefore, the Department has determined that for some discretionary grant competitions, PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 applications may be separated into two or more groups and ranked and selected for funding within specific groups. This procedure will make it easier for the Department to find peer reviewers by ensuring that greater numbers of individuals who are eligible to serve as reviewers for any particular group of applicants will not have conflicts of interest. It also will increase the quality, independence, and fairness of the review process, while permitting panel members to review applications under discretionary grant competitions for which they also have submitted applications. 4. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible. 5. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this competition to receive an award that over the course of the project period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal awards—that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant—before we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS. Please note that, if the total value of your currently active grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the Federal government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal funds you receive exceed $10,000,000. E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 61 / Monday, March 30, 2020 / Notices lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES VI. Award Administration Information 1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, also. If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, we notify you. 2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify administrative and national policy requirements in the application package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also incorporates your approved application as part of your binding commitments under the grant. 3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. Additionally, a grantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 3474.20. 4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b). (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final performance report, including financial information, as directed by the Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual performance report that provides the most current performance and financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Mar 27, 2020 Jkt 250001 under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/ fund/grant/apply/appforms/ appforms.html. (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period. 5. Performance Measures: Under GPRA, the Department has established a set of performance measures, including long-term measures, that are designed to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness and quality of the Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities program. These measures include: (1) The percentage of preparation programs that incorporate scientifically or evidence-based practices into their curricula; (2) the percentage of scholars completing preparation programs who are knowledgeable and skilled in evidencebased practices that improve outcomes for children with disabilities; (3) the percentage of scholars who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance; (4) the percentage of scholars completing preparation programs who are working in the area(s) in which they were prepared upon program completion; and (5) the Federal cost per scholar who completed the preparation program. In addition, the Department will gather information on the following outcome measures: (1) The percentage of scholars who completed the preparation program and are employed in high-need districts; (2) the percentage of scholars who completed the preparation program and are employed in the field of special education for at least two years; and (3) the percentage of scholars who completed the preparation program and who are rated effective by their employers. Grantees may be asked to participate in assessing and providing information on these aspects of program quality. 6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the Secretary has established performance measurement PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17565 requirements, the performance targets in the grantee’s approved application. In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23). VII. Other Information Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the Federal Register by using the article search feature at www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. Mark Schultz, Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. Delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. [FR Doc. 2020–06522 Filed 3–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0055] Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; Loan Discharge Application: Forgery Federal Student Aid (FSA), Department of Education (ED). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is proposing an extension of an existing information collection. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM 30MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 61 (Monday, March 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17556-17565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


Applications for New Awards; Personnel Development To Improve 
Services and Results for Children With Disabilities--Interdisciplinary 
Preparation in Special Education, Early Intervention, and Related 
Services for Personnel Serving Children With Disabilities Who Have 
High-Intensity Needs

AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 
Department of Education.

[[Page 17557]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice 
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for 
Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with 
Disabilities--Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early 
Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with 
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs, Catalog of Federal Domestic 
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.325K. This notice relates to the approved 
information collection under OMB control number 1820-0028.

DATES: 
    Applications Available: March 30, 2020.
    Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 29, 2020.
    Pre-Application Webinar Information: No later than April 6, 2020, 
the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) will post a pre-
recorded informational webinar designed to provide technical assistance 
to interested applicants. The webinar may be found at www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/osep/new-osep-grants.html.
    Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 28, 2020.

ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an 
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to 
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the 
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at 
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Focus Area A: Sunyoung Ahn, U.S. 
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5012A, Potomac 
Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6460. 
Email: [email protected].
    For Focus Area B: LaTisha Putney, U.S. Department of Education, 400 
Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5060D, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 
20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6172. Email: [email protected].
    If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text 
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Full Text of Announcement

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    Purpose of Program: The purposes of this program are to (1) help 
address State-identified needs for personnel preparation in special 
education, early intervention, related services, and regular education 
to work with children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with 
disabilities; and (2) ensure that those personnel have the necessary 
skills and knowledge, derived from practices that have been determined 
through scientifically based research, to be successful in serving 
those children.
    Priorities: This competition includes one absolute priority. In 
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), this absolute priority is from 
allowable activities specified in the statute (see sections 662 and 681 
of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. 
1462 and 1481)).
    Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we 
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this 
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR 
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet this priority.
    This priority is:
    Interdisciplinary Preparation in Special Education, Early 
Intervention, and Related Services for Personnel Serving Children with 
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs.
    Background:
    The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve 
the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children, 
including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs,\1\ especially in areas of chronic personnel shortage. 
Under this priority, the Department will fund high-quality 
interdisciplinary \2\ projects that prepare special education, early 
intervention, and related services \3\ personnel at the master's 
degree, educational specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree 
levels for professional practice in a variety of education settings, 
including natural environments (the home and community settings in 
which children with and without disabilities participate), early 
learning programs, classrooms, and school settings. The competition 
will also prepare personnel who have the knowledge and skills to 
support each child with a disability in meeting high expectations and 
to partner with other providers, families, and administrators in 
meaningful and effective collaborations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-intensity needs'' 
refers to a complex array of disabilities (e.g., multiple 
disabilities, significant cognitive disabilities, significant 
physical disabilities, significant sensory disabilities, significant 
autism, significant emotional disabilities, or significant learning 
disabilities, including dyslexia) or the needs of children with 
these disabilities requiring intensive, individualized 
intervention(s) (i.e., that are specifically designed to address 
persistent learning or behavior difficulties, implemented with 
greater frequency and for an extended duration than is commonly 
available in a typical classroom or early intervention setting, or 
which require personnel to have knowledge and skills in identifying 
and implementing multiple evidence-based interventions).
    \2\ For the purposes of this priority, ``interdisciplinary'' 
refers to preparing scholars from two or more graduate degree 
programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and 
one or more related services through shared coursework, group 
assignments, and coordinated field experiences; or (b) two or more 
related services through shared coursework, group assignments, and 
coordinated field experiences. Different graduate degree programs 
across more than one institution of higher education may partner to 
develop an interdisciplinary project.
    For the purpose of this priority, ``interdisciplinary'' does not 
include: (a) Individual scholars who receive two or more graduate 
degrees; (b) one graduate degree program that prepares scholars with 
different areas of focus; (c) one graduate degree program that 
offers interdisciplinary content but does not prepare scholars from 
two or more degree programs together; or (d) one graduate degree 
program in special education, early intervention, and related 
services partnering with a graduate degree program other than 
special education, early intervention, or related services. Programs 
in which scholars receive only a certificate or endorsement without 
a graduate degree are not eligible.
    \3\ For the purposes of this priority, ``related services'' 
includes the following: Speech-language pathology and audiology 
services; interpreting services; psychological services; applied 
behavior analysis; physical therapy and occupational therapy; 
recreation, including therapeutic recreation; social work services; 
counseling services, including rehabilitation counseling; and 
orientation and mobility services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    State demand for fully credentialed special education, early 
intervention, and related services personnel to serve children, 
including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities, exceeds the 
available supply, particularly in high-need schools \4\ (Boe et al., 
2013). These shortages can negatively affect the quality of services 
provided to children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with 
disabilities and their families (Boe et al., 2013). These shortages 
limit the field's ability to ensure that each child has the opportunity 
to meet challenging objectives and receive an individualized education 
program that is both meaningful and appropriately ambitious, which is 
essential for preparing them for the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-need school'' 
refers to a public elementary or secondary school that is a ``high-
need local educational agency (LEA),'' ``high-poverty,'' 
``implementing a comprehensive support and improvement plan,'' or 
``implementing a targeted support and improvement plan'' as defined 
in footnotes 9, 10, 11, and 12, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The need for personnel with the knowledge and skills to serve 
children, including infants, toddlers, and youth with disabilities who 
have high-intensity needs, is even greater because specialized or 
advanced preparation is

[[Page 17558]]

required to collaboratively design and deliver evidence-based \5\ 
instruction and intensive individualized intervention(s) in natural 
environments, classrooms, and schools that address the needs of these 
individuals (Boe et al., 2013; Browder et al., 2014; McLeskey & 
Brownell, 2015). Although children, including infants and toddlers, and 
youth with disabilities who have high-intensity needs may require the 
combined expertise of numerous professionals (including special 
education, early intervention, and related services providers), it is 
often difficult for personnel from varied professional backgrounds to 
work together because they lack shared information, understanding, and 
experience.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For the purposes of this priority, ``evidence-based'' means, 
at a minimum, evidence that demonstrates a rationale (as defined in 
34 CFR 77.1), where a key project component included in the 
project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation findings 
that suggest the project component is likely to improve relevant 
outcomes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interdisciplinary approaches to personnel preparation provide 
scholars with experience working and learning in team environments 
similar to those in which they are likely to work once employed (Smith, 
2010). That is, when providing early intervention or special education 
services under the IDEA, personnel serving children, including infants 
and toddlers, and youth with disabilities work on interdisciplinary 
teams with parents, general and special education teachers, early 
interventionists, and related service providers with the expertise to 
design, implement, and evaluate instruction, intervention plans, 
individualized family service plans, and individualized education 
programs based on the unique learning and developmental needs of each 
child. To enable personnel to provide efficient, high-quality 
integrated services, personnel preparation programs need to embed 
content, practices, and field experience into preservice training that 
is aligned with the interdisciplinary team-based approaches in which 
graduates are likely to work. This priority aims to fund 
interdisciplinary projects that will provide such preparation.
    The projects must be awarded and operated in a manner consistent 
with nondiscrimination requirements contained in the U.S. Constitution 
and the Federal civil rights laws.
    Priority:
    The purpose of this priority is to increase the number and improve 
the quality of personnel who are fully credentialed to serve children, 
including infants and toddlers, and youth with disabilities who have 
high-intensity needs--especially in areas of chronic personnel 
shortage. The priority will fund high-quality interdisciplinary 
projects that prepare special education, early intervention, and 
related services personnel at the master's degree, educational 
specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree levels for professional 
practice in natural environments, early learning programs, classrooms, 
and school settings serving children, including infants and toddlers, 
and youth with disabilities.
    Specifically, an applicant must propose an interdisciplinary 
project supporting scholars \6\ from two or more graduate degree 
programs in either (a) special education or early intervention and one 
or more related services; or (b) two or more related services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For the purposes of this priority, ``scholar'' is limited to 
an individual who (a) is pursuing a master's, educational specialist 
degree, or clinical doctoral graduate degree in special education, 
early intervention, or related services (as defined in this notice); 
(b) receives scholarship assistance as authorized under section 662 
of IDEA (34 CFR 304.3(g)); (c) will be eligible for a license, 
endorsement, or certification from a State or national credentialing 
authority following completion of the graduate degree program 
identified in the application; and (d) will be able to be employed 
in a position that serves children with disabilities for either 51 
percent of their time or case load. See https://pdp.ed.gov/OSEP/Home/Regulation for more information.
    Scholars from each graduate degree program participating in the 
proposed interdisciplinary project must receive scholar support and 
be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements following 
graduate degree program completion. Scholars from each graduate 
degree program participating in this project must complete the 
requirements of their unique graduate degree program and receive 
different graduate degrees. Individuals pursuing degrees in general 
education or early childhood education do not qualify as 
``scholars'' eligible for scholarship assistance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An interdisciplinary project is a project that delivers core 
content through shared coursework, group assignments, and coordinated 
field experiences as part of two or more master's degree, educational 
specialist degree, or clinical doctoral degree programs for scholars. 
Not all requirements (e.g., courses and field experiences) of each 
participating graduate degree program must be shared across all degree 
programs participating in the interdisciplinary project, but the 
interdisciplinary project must: (a) Identify the competencies needed to 
promote high expectations and address the individualized needs of 
children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs using an 
interdisciplinary approach to service delivery; (b) outline how the 
project will build capacity in those areas through shared coursework, 
group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for scholars 
supported by the proposed project; and (c) identify the aspects of each 
graduate degree program that are shared across all participating degree 
programs and those that remain unique to each.
    Projects may include individuals who are in degree programs (e.g., 
general education, early childhood education, administration) and who 
are cooperating with, but not funded as scholars by, the applicant's 
proposed interdisciplinary project. These individuals may participate 
in the shared coursework, group assignments, coordinated field 
experiences, and other opportunities required of scholars and funded by 
the project (e.g., speaker series, monthly seminars) if doing so does 
not diminish the benefit for project-funded scholars (e.g., by reducing 
funds available for scholar support or limiting opportunities for 
scholars to participate in project activities).
    Personnel preparation degree programs that prepare all scholars to 
be dually certified can qualify under this priority by partnering with 
at least one additional graduate degree program in related services.
    Personnel preparation programs that prepare individuals to be 
educational interpreters for the deaf at the bachelor's degree level 
can qualify under this priority and are exempted from (a) the 
interdisciplinary requirement and (b) the requirement for two or more 
graduate degree programs. All other priority requirements specified for 
graduate programs will apply to the bachelor's program. While 
interdisciplinary projects are not required for educational 
interpreters, they are encouraged.
    Focus Areas: Within this absolute priority, the Secretary intends 
to support interdisciplinary projects under the following two focus 
areas: (A) Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and 
Preschool-Age Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs; 
and (B) Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with 
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs.
    Applicants must identify the specific focus area (i.e., A or B) 
under which they are applying as part of the competition title on the 
application cover sheet (SF 424, line 12). Applicants may not submit 
the same proposal under more than one focus area. Applicants may submit 
different proposals in different focus areas.
    Focus Area A: Preparing Personnel to Serve Infants, Toddlers, and 
Preschool-Age Children with Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. 
This focus area is

[[Page 17559]]

for interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared 
coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences for 
scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a) 
Early intervention or early childhood special education and related 
services for infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with 
disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related 
services to serve infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children with 
disabilities who have high-intensity needs.
    Early intervention personnel are those who are prepared to provide 
services to infants and toddlers with disabilities ages birth to three, 
and early childhood personnel are those who are prepared to provide 
services to children with disabilities ages three through five (and in 
States where the age range is other than ages three through five, we 
defer to the State's certification for early childhood special 
education). In States where certification in early intervention is 
combined with certification in early childhood special education, 
applicants may propose a combined early intervention and early 
childhood special education personnel preparation project under this 
focus area.
    Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications 
from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs).\7\ OSEP also 
may fund out of rank order high-quality applications to ensure that 
projects are funded across both Focus Area A and Focus Area B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For the purposes of this priority, ``Historically Black 
College or University'' is as defined under section 322 of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Focus Area B: Preparing Personnel to Serve School-Age Children with 
Disabilities who have High-Intensity Needs. This focus area is for 
interdisciplinary projects that deliver core content through shared 
coursework, group assignments, and coordinated field experiences to 
scholars across two or more graduate degree programs in either: (a) 
Special education and related services for school-age children with 
disabilities who have high-intensity needs; or (b) two or more related 
services to serve school-age children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs.
    Note: OSEP may fund out of rank order high-quality applications 
from HBCUs. OSEP also may fund out of rank order high-quality 
applications to ensure that projects are funded across both Focus Area 
A and Focus Area B.
    Focus Areas A and B:
    Applicants may use up to the first 12 months of the performance 
period and up to $100,000 of the first budget period for planning 
without enrolling scholars. Applicants must clearly provide sufficient 
justification for requesting program planning time and include the 
goals, objectives, and intended outcomes of program planning in year 
one, a description of the proposed strategies and activities to be 
supported, and a timeline for the work; such as--
    (1) Outlining or updating coursework, group assignments, or 
coordinated field experience needed to support interdisciplinary 
preparation for special education, early intervention, or related 
services personnel serving children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
    (2) Building capacity (e.g., hiring of a field supervisor, 
providing professional development for field supervisors, and training 
for faculty);
    (3) Purchasing needed resources (e.g., additional teaching supplies 
or specialized equipment to enhance instruction); or
    (4) Negotiating agreements with programs or schools to serve as 
sites for coordinated field experience needed to support delivery of 
the proposed interdisciplinary project.
    Additional Federal funds may be requested for scholar support and 
other grant activities occurring in year one of the project, provided 
that the total request for year one does not exceed the maximum award 
available for one budget period of 12 months (i.e., $250,000).
    Note: Applicants proposing projects to develop, expand, or add a 
new area of emphasis to special education, early intervention, or 
related services programs must provide, in their applications, 
information on how these new areas will be sustained once Federal 
funding ends.
    To be considered for funding under this absolute priority, all 
program applicants must meet the application requirements contained in 
this priority. All projects funded under this absolute priority also 
must meet the programmatic and administrative requirements specified in 
this priority.
    Note: Applicants are required to meet the matching support for the 
proposed project at 10 percent of the total amount of the grant as 
specified in paragraph (d)(10) of the priority requirements for an 
application to be reviewed and be considered eligible to receive an 
award.
    To meet the requirements of this priority an applicant must--
    (a) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under 
``Significance,'' how--
    (1) The project addresses national, State, regional, or district 
shortages of personnel who are fully qualified to serve children with 
disabilities, ages birth through 21, who have high-intensity needs. To 
address this requirement, the applicant must--
    (i) Present data on the quality of each special education, early 
intervention, or related services personnel preparation degree program 
participating in the project, in areas such as: The average amount of 
time it takes for scholars to complete the program; the percentage of 
program graduates who receive a license, endorsement, or certification 
related to special education, related services, or early intervention 
services; the percentage of program graduates finding employment 
related to their preparation after graduation; the effectiveness of 
program graduates in providing special education, early intervention, 
or related services, which could include data on the learning and 
developmental outcomes of children with disabilities they serve; the 
percentage of program graduates who maintain employment for two or more 
years in the area for which they were prepared; and the percentage of 
employers who rate the preparation of scholars who complete their 
degree program as adequate or higher; and
    (ii) If available for the degree programs participating in the 
proposed project, present data on the quality of their 
interdisciplinary approaches to the preparation of special education, 
early intervention, or related services personnel; and
    Note: Data on the quality of a personnel preparation program should 
be no older than five years prior to the start date of the project 
proposed in the application. When reporting percentages, the 
denominator (i.e., total number of scholars or program graduates) must 
be provided.
    (2) The project will increase the number of personnel who 
demonstrate the competencies \8\ needed to--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For the purposes of this priority, ``competencies'' means 
what a person knows and can do--the knowledge, skills, and 
dispositions necessary to effectively function in a role (National 
Professional Development Center on Inclusion, 2011). These 
competencies should ensure that personnel are able to use 
challenging academic standards, child achievement and functional 
standards, and assessments to improve instructional practices, 
services, learning and developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, 
social, emotional, behavioral), and college- and career-readiness of 
children with disabilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (i) Promote high expectations;
    (ii) Differentiate instruction;
    (iii) Provide intensive individualized instruction and 
intervention(s); and
    (iv) Collaborate with diverse stakeholders using an 
interdisciplinary

[[Page 17560]]

team-based approach to address the individualized needs of children 
with disabilities who have high-intensity needs, ages birth through 21, 
and designed to achieve improvements in learning or developmental 
outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral), or successful 
transition to postsecondary education and the workforce. To address 
this requirement, the applicant must--
    (A) Identify the competencies that special education, early 
intervention, or related services personnel need to--
    (1) Promote high expectations;
    (2) Differentiate instruction;
    (3) Provide intensive individualized instruction and 
intervention(s); and
    (4) Collaborate with parents, families, and diverse stakeholders 
using an interdisciplinary team-based approach designed to lead to 
improved learning and developmental outcomes; ensure access to and 
progress in academic achievement standards or alternate academic 
achievement standards, as appropriate; lead to successful transition to 
college and career for children with disabilities, including children 
with disabilities who have high-intensity needs; and maximize the use 
of effective technology, including assistive technology, to deliver 
instruction, interventions, and services;
    (B) Identify the competencies needed by members of 
interdisciplinary teams to promote high expectations and improve early 
childhood, educational, and employment outcomes for children with 
disabilities who have high-intensity needs;
    (C) Identify the competencies that personnel need to support 
inclusion of children with disabilities who have high-intensity needs 
in the least restrictive and natural environments to the maximum extent 
appropriate by intentionally promoting high expectations and 
participation in learning and social activities to foster development, 
learning, academic achievement, friendships with peers, and sense of 
belonging;
    (D) Identify how scholars will be prepared to develop, implement, 
and evaluate evidence-based instruction and evidence-based 
interventions that improve outcomes for children with disabilities who 
have high-intensity needs in a variety of settings (e.g., natural 
environments; public schools, including charter schools; private 
schools, including parochial schools; and other nonpublic education 
settings, including home education); and
    (E) Provide a conceptual framework for the proposed 
interdisciplinary personnel preparation project, including any 
empirical support for project activities designed to promote the 
acquisition of the identified competencies (see paragraph (a)(2) of the 
requirements for this priority) needed by special education, early 
intervention, or related services personnel, and how these competencies 
relate to the proposed project;
    (b) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under 
``Quality of project services,'' how the project--
    (1) Will conduct its planning activities, if the applicant will use 
any of the allowable first 12 months of the project period for 
planning;
    (2) Will recruit and retain high-quality scholars into each of the 
graduate degree programs participating in the project and ensure equal 
access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members 
of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, 
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. To meet this 
requirement, the applicant must describe--
    (i) Criteria the applicant will use to identify high-quality 
applicants for admission into each of the graduate degree programs 
participating in the project;
    (ii) Recruitment strategies the applicant will use to attract high-
quality applicants and any specific recruitment strategies targeting 
high-quality applicants from traditionally underrepresented groups, 
including individuals with disabilities; and
    (iii) The approach, including mentoring, monitoring, and 
accommodations, the applicant will use to support scholars to complete 
their respective degree programs;
    (3) Reflects current evidence-based practices, including practices 
in the areas of literacy and numeracy development, assessment, 
behavior, instructional practices, and inclusive strategies, as 
appropriate, and is designed to prepare scholars in the identified 
competencies. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe 
how the project will--
    (i) Incorporate current evidence-based practices (including 
relevant research citations) that improve outcomes for children with 
disabilities who have high-intensity needs into (a) the required 
coursework and field experiences for each graduate degree program 
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group 
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the 
interdisciplinary portions of the project; and
    (ii) Use evidence-based professional development practices for 
adult learners to instruct scholars;
    (4) Is of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration to prepare 
scholars in the identified competencies. To address this requirement, 
the applicant must describe how--
    (i) The components of (a) each graduate degree program 
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group 
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the 
interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will support 
scholars' acquisition and enhancement of the identified competencies;
    (ii) The components of (a) each graduate degree program 
participating in the project; and (b) the shared coursework, group 
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required for the 
interdisciplinary portions of the proposed project will be integrated 
to allow scholars, in collaboration with other team members, to use 
their knowledge and skills in designing, implementing, and evaluating 
practices supported by evidence to address the learning and 
developmental needs of children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
    (iii) Scholars will be provided with ongoing guidance and feedback 
during training; and
    (iv) The proposed project will provide ongoing induction 
opportunities and mentoring support to graduates of each graduate 
degree program participating in the project;
    (5) Will engage in meaningful and effective collaboration with 
appropriate partners representing diverse stakeholders, including--
    (i) High-need schools, which may include high-need local 
educational agencies (LEAs),\9\ high-poverty schools,\10\ schools 
identified for comprehensive support and improvement,\11\ and schools

[[Page 17561]]

implementing a targeted support and improvement plan \12\ for children 
with disabilities; early childhood and early intervention programs 
located within the geographic boundaries of a high-need LEA; and early 
childhood and early intervention programs located within the 
geographical boundaries of an LEA serving the highest percentage of 
schools identified for comprehensive support and improvement or 
implementing targeted support and improvement plans in the State. The 
purpose of these partnerships is to provide field practice for scholars 
aimed at developing the identified competencies as members of 
interdisciplinary teams; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-need LEA'' means 
an LEA (a) that serves not fewer than 10,000 children from families 
with incomes below the poverty line; or (b) for which not less than 
20 percent of the children are from families with incomes below the 
poverty line.
    \10\ For the purposes of this priority, ``high-poverty school'' 
means a school in which at least 50 percent of students are from 
low-income families as determined using one of the measures of 
poverty specified under section 1113(a)(5) of the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA). For middle and 
high schools, eligibility may be calculated on the basis of 
comparable data from feeder schools. Eligibility as a high-poverty 
school under this definition is determined on the basis of the most 
currently available data.
    \11\ For the purposes of this priority, ``school implementing a 
comprehensive support and improvement plan'' means a school 
identified for comprehensive support and improvement by a State 
under section 1111(c)(4)(D) of the ESEA that includes (a) not less 
than the lowest performing 5 percent of all schools in the State 
receiving funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA; (b) all public 
high schools in the State failing to graduate one third or more of 
their students; and (c) public schools in the State described under 
section 1111(d)(3)(A)(i)(II) of the ESEA.
    \12\ For the purposes of this priority, ``school implementing a 
targeted support and improvement plan'' means a school identified 
for targeted support and improvement by a State that has developed 
and is implementing a school-level targeted support and improvement 
plan to improve student outcomes based on the indicators in the 
statewide accountability system as defined in section 1111(d)(2) of 
the ESEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (ii) Other personnel preparation programs on campus or at 
partnering universities for the purpose of sharing resources, 
supporting program development and delivery, and addressing personnel 
shortages;
    (6) Will use technology, as appropriate, to promote scholar 
learning and professional practice, enhance the efficiency of the 
project, collaborate with partners, and facilitate ongoing mentoring 
and support for scholars;
    (7) Will ensure that scholars understand how to use technology to 
support student learning and students' use of educational and assistive 
technology; and
    (8) Will align with and use resources, as appropriate, available 
through technical assistance centers, which may include centers funded 
by the Department;
    Note: Use the ``Find a Center or Grant'' link at https://osepideasthatwork.org for information about OSEP-funded technical 
assistance centers.
    (c) Demonstrate, in the narrative section of the application under 
``Quality of the project evaluation,'' how--
    (1) The applicant will use comprehensive and appropriate 
methodologies to evaluate how well the goals or objectives of the 
proposed project have been met, including the project processes and 
outcomes;
    (2) The applicant will collect, analyze, and use data related to 
specific and measurable goals, objectives, and outcomes of the project. 
To address this requirement, the applicant must describe how--
    (i) Scholar competencies and other project processes and outcomes 
will be measured for formative evaluation purposes, including proposed 
instruments, data collection methods, and possible analyses; and
    (ii) It will collect and analyze data on the quality of services 
provided by scholars who complete the graduate degree programs involved 
in this interdisciplinary project and are employed in the field for 
which they were trained, including data on the learning and 
developmental outcomes (e.g., academic, social, emotional, behavioral, 
meeting college- and career-ready standards), and on growth toward 
these outcomes, of the children with disabilities who have high-
intensity needs;
    Note: Following the completion of the project period, grantees are 
encouraged to engage in ongoing data collection activities.
    (3) The methods of evaluation will produce quantitative and 
qualitative data for objective performance measures that are related to 
the outcomes of the proposed project; and
    (4) The methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and 
allow for periodic assessment of progress towards meeting the project 
outcomes. To address this requirement, the applicant must describe 
how--
    (i) Results of the evaluation will be used as a basis for improving 
the proposed project to prepare special education, early intervention, 
or related services personnel to provide (a) focused instruction; and 
(b) intensive individualized intervention(s) in an interdisciplinary 
team-based approach to improve outcomes of children with disabilities 
who have high-intensity needs; and
    (ii) The grantee will report the evaluation results to OSEP in its 
annual and final performance reports;
    (d) Demonstrate, in the narrative under ``Project Assurances'' or 
in the applicable appendices, that the following program requirements 
are met. The applicant must--
    (1) Provide scholar support for participants from two or more 
graduate degree programs partnering in the proposed interdisciplinary 
personnel preparation project. Consistent with 34 CFR 304.30, each 
scholar must (a) receive support for no less than one academic year, 
and (b) be eligible to fulfill service obligation requirements 
following degree program completion. Funding across degree programs may 
be applied differently;
    (2) Include in Appendix B of the application--
    (i) Table(s) that summarize the required program of study for each 
degree program and that clearly delineate the shared coursework, group 
assignments, and coordinated field experiences required of all project 
scholars to support interdisciplinary practice;
    (ii) Course syllabi for all coursework in the major of each degree 
program and all shared courses, group assignments, and coordinated 
field experiences required of project scholars; and
    (iii) Learning outcomes for proposed coursework;
    (3) Ensure that a comprehensive set of completed syllabi, including 
syllabi created or revised as part of a project planning year, are 
submitted to OSEP by the end of year one of the grant;
    (4) Ensure scholars will not be selected based on race, ethnicity, 
or national origin. Per the Supreme Court's decision in Adarand 
Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995), the Department does 
not allow the selection of individuals on the basis of race, ethnicity, 
or national origin. For this reason, grantees must ensure that any 
discussion of the recruitment of scholars based on race, ethnicity, or 
national origin distinguishes between increasing the pool of applicants 
and actually selecting scholars;
    (5) Ensure that the project will meet all requirements in 34 CFR 
304.23, particularly those related to (a) informing all scholarship 
recipients of their service obligation commitment and (b) disbursing 
scholar support. Failure by a grantee to properly meet these 
requirements would be a violation of the grant award that could result 
in sanctions, including the grantee being liable for returning any 
misused funds to the Department;
    (6) Ensure that prior approval from the OSEP project officer will 
be obtained before admitting additional scholars beyond the number of 
scholars proposed in the application and before transferring a scholar 
to another OSEP-funded grant;
    (7) Ensure that the project will meet the statutory requirements in 
section 662(e) through (h) of IDEA;
    (8) Ensure that at least 65 percent of the total award over the 
project period (i.e., up to 5 years) will be used for scholar support. 
Applicants proposing to use year one for program development may budget 
for less than 65 percent of the total requested budget over the 5 years 
for scholar support;

[[Page 17562]]

such applicants must ensure that 65 percent of the total award minus 
funds allocated for program development will be used for scholar 
support;
    (9) Ensure that the institution of higher education (IHE) at which 
scholars are enrolled in the program will not require those scholars to 
work (e.g., as graduate assistants) as a condition of receiving support 
(e.g., tuition, stipends) from the proposed project, unless the work is 
specifically related to the acquisition of scholars' competencies or 
the requirements for completion of their personnel preparation program. 
This prohibition on work as a condition of receiving support does not 
apply to the service obligation requirements in section 662(h) of IDEA;
    (10) Demonstrate, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and 
budget narrative, matching support for the proposed project at 10 
percent of the total amount of the grant. Applicants must propose the 
amount of cash or in-kind resources;
    Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this 
program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference 
between a grantee's negotiated indirect cost rate and the 8 percent 
limit cannot be used to meet this absolute priority.
    Matching support can be either cash or in-kind donations. Under 2 
CFR 200.306, a cash expenditure or outlay of cash with respect to the 
matching budget by the grantee is considered a cash contribution. 
Certain cash contributions that the organization normally considers an 
indirect cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes 
of meeting matching support. Unrecovered indirect costs cannot be used 
to meet the non-Federal matching support. Under 2 CFR 200.434, third-
party in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land, 
buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a 
non-Federal third party at no charge to the grantee.
    To the maximum extent possible, OSEP encourages matching support be 
used toward scholar support.
    (11) Ensure that the budget includes attendance of the project 
director at a three-day project directors' meeting in Washington, DC, 
during each year of the project;
    (12) Ensure that the project director, key personnel, and, as 
appropriate, scholars will actively participate in the cross-project 
collaboration, advanced trainings, and cross-site learning 
opportunities (e.g., webinars, briefings) organized by OSEP. This 
partnership will be used to build capacity of participants, increase 
the impact of funding, and promote innovative and interdisciplinary 
service delivery models across projects;
    (13) Ensure that if the project maintains a website, relevant 
information and documents are in a format that meets government or 
industry-recognized standards for accessibility; and
    (14) Ensure that annual data will be submitted on each scholar who 
receives grant support (OMB Control Number 1820-0686). The primary 
purposes of the data collection are to track the service obligation 
fulfillment of scholars who receive funds from OSEP grants and to 
collect data for program performance measure reporting under the 
Government Performance and Results Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRA). 
Applicants are encouraged to visit the Personnel Development Program 
Data Collection System (DCS) website at https://pdp.ed.gov/osep for 
further information about this data collection requirement. Typically, 
data collection begins in January of each year, and grantees are 
notified by email about the data collection period for their grant, 
although grantees may submit data as needed, year round. This data 
collection must be submitted electronically by the grantee and does not 
supplant the annual grant performance report required of each grantee 
for continuation funding (see 34 CFR 75.590). Data collection includes 
the submission of a signed, completed Pre-Scholarship Agreement and 
Exit Certification for each scholar funded under an OSEP grant (see 
paragraph (5) of this section).
    Competitive Preference Priorities: Within this absolute priority, 
we give competitive preference to applications that address the 
following priorities.
    In accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(v), Competitive Preference 
Priority 1 is from allowable activities specified in the statute (see 
sections 662 and 681 of the IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481)). 
Competitive Preference Priority 2 is from the Department's 
Administrative Priorities for Discretionary Grant Programs published in 
the Federal Register on March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative 
Priorities).
    Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional 5 points 
to an application, depending on how well the application meets 
Competitive Preference Priority 1, and an additional 7 points to an 
application that meets Competitive Preference Priority 2. Applicants 
should indicate in the abstract which, if any, competitive preference 
priorities are addressed.
    These priorities are:
    Competitive Preference Priority 1 (0 to 5 points).
    Applicants that demonstrate matching support \13\ for the proposed 
project at--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For the purposes of this priority, matching support can be 
either cash or in-kind donations. According to 2 CFR 200.306, a cash 
expenditure or an outlay of cash with respect to the matching budget 
by the grantee is considered a cash contribution. Certain cash 
contributions that the organization normally considers an indirect 
cost should not be counted as a direct cost for the purposes of 
meeting matching support. According to 2 CFR 200.434, third-party 
in-kind contributions are services or property (e.g., land, 
buildings, equipment, materials, supplies) that are contributed by a 
non-Federal third-party at no charge to the grantee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (i) 20 percent of the total amount of the grant (2 points);
    (ii) 30 percent of the total amount of the grant (3 points);
    (iii) 40 percent of the total amount of the grant (4 points); or
    (iv) 50 percent of the total amount of the grant (5 points).
    Note: Under 34 CFR 75.562, educational training grants under this 
program have an 8 percent limit on indirect costs. The difference 
between an applicant's negotiated indirect cost rate (e.g., 40 percent) 
and the 8 percent limit cannot be used to meet any portion of the 
competitive preference priority.
    Note: Applicants must address this competitive preference priority, 
if applicable, in the budget information (ED 524, Section B) and the 
budget narrative. The applicant must propose the amount of cash or in-
kind resources to be contributed for each year of the grant.
    Competitive Preference Priority 2--Applications from New Potential 
Grantees (0 or 7 points).
    (a) Under this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that the 
applicant has not had an active discretionary grant under the program 
from which it seeks funds, including through membership in a group 
application submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, five 
years before the deadline date for submission of applications under the 
program.
    (b) For the purpose of this priority, a grant or contract is active 
until the end of the grant's or contract's project or funding period, 
including any extensions of those periods that extend the grantee's or 
contractor's authority to obligate funds.

References

Boe, E. E., deBettencourt, L., Dewey, J. F., Rosenberg, M. S., 
Sindelar, P. T., & Leko, C. D. (2013). Variability in demand for 
special education teachers: Indicators, explanations, and impacts. 
Exceptionality, 21(2), 103-125.

[[Page 17563]]

Browder, D. M., Wood, L., Thompson, J., & Ribuffo, C. (2014). 
Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities 
(Document No. IC-3). https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tool/innovation-configurations/.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1400, et seq. 
(2004).
McLeskey, J., & Brownell, M. (2015). High-leverage practices and 
teacher preparation in special education (Document No. PR-1). https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/High-Leverage-Practices-and-Teacher-Preparation-in-Special-Education.pdf.
National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (August, 
2011). Competencies for early childhood educators in the context of 
inclusion: Issues and guidance for States. The University of North 
Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
Smith, J. (2010). An interdisciplinary approach to preparing early 
intervention professionals: A university and community collaborative 
initiative. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(2), 131-142.

    Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure 
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested 
parties the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities. Section 
681(d) of IDEA, however, makes the public comment requirements of the 
APA inapplicable to the absolute priority and Competitive Preference 
Priority 1 in this notice.

    Program Authority:  20 U.S.C. 1462 and 1481.
    Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General 
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to 
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department 
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR 
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 304. (e) 
The Administrative Priorities.

    Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
    Estimated Available Funds: $1,000,000.
    Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of 
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2021 from the list of 
unfunded applications from this competition.
    Estimated Range of Awards: $200,000-$250,000.
    Estimated Average Size of Awards: $225,000.
    Maximum Award: We will not make an award exceeding $250,000 for a 
single budget period of 12 months.
    Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
    Project Period: Up to 60 months.

    Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this 
notice.

III. Eligibility Information

    1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs and private nonprofit organizations.
    2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Cost sharing or matching is required 
for this competition. See the absolute priority.
    3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award 
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities 
described in its application. Under 34 CFR 75.708(e), a grantee may 
contract for supplies, equipment, and other services in accordance with 
2 CFR part 200.
    4. Other General Requirements: (a) Recipients of funding under this 
competition must make positive efforts to employ and advance in 
employment qualified individuals with disabilities (see section 606 of 
IDEA).
    (b) Applicants for, and recipients of, funding must, with respect 
to the aspects of their proposed project relating to the absolute 
priority, involve individuals with disabilities, or parents of 
individuals with disabilities ages birth through 26, in planning, 
implementing, and evaluating the project (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of 
IDEA).

IV. Application and Submission Information

    1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to 
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of 
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal 
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at 
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which 
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
    2. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to 
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. 
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under 
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this 
competition.
    3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding 
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
    4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of 
the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection 
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend 
that you (1) limit the application narrative to no more than 50 pages 
and (2) use the following standards:
     A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1'' 
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
     Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) 
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, 
footnotes, quotations, reference citations, and captions, as well as 
all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs, and screen shots.
     Use a font that is 12 point or larger.
     Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, 
Courier New, or Arial.
    The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover 
sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget 
justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the 
abstract (follow the guidance provided in the application package for 
completing the abstract), the table of contents, the list of priority 
requirements, the resumes, the reference list, the letters of support, 
or the appendices. However, the recommended page limit does apply to 
all of the application narrative, including all text in charts, tables, 
figures, graphs, and screen shots.

V. Application Review Information

    1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition 
are from 34 CFR 75.210 and are as follows:
    (a) Significance (10 points).
    (1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed 
project.
    (2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the proposed project will prepare personnel 
for fields in which shortages have been demonstrated; and
    (ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely 
to be attained by the proposed project, especially improvements in 
teaching and student achievement.
    (b) Quality of project services (45 points).
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be 
provided by the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by 
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the

[[Page 17564]]

quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and 
treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups 
that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, 
national origin, gender, age, or disability.
    (3) In determining the quality of the project services, the 
Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed 
project reflect up-to-date knowledge from research and effective 
practice;
    (ii) The extent to which the training or professional development 
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient 
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice 
among the recipients of those services;
    (iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the 
proposed project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for 
maximizing the effectiveness of project services; and
    (iv) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained program of training in the field.
    (c) Quality of the project evaluation (25 points).
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be 
conducted of the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary 
considers the following factors:
    (i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, 
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the 
proposed project;
    (ii) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be 
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable;
    (iii) The extent to which the methods of evaluation include the use 
of objective performance measures that are clearly related to the 
intended outcomes of the project and will produce quantitative and 
qualitative data to the extent possible; and
    (iv) The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide 
performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward 
achieving intended outcomes.
    (d) Quality of project personnel, quality of the management plan, 
and adequacy of resources (20 points).
    (1) The Secretary considers the quality of the project personnel, 
the quality of the management plan, and the adequacy of resources for 
the proposed project.
    (2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary 
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for 
employment from persons who are members of groups that have 
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability.
    (3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
    (i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, 
of key project personnel;
    (ii) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives 
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly 
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing 
project tasks;
    (iii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project 
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are 
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed 
project;
    (iv) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, 
supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the 
lead applicant organization; and
    (v) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the 
objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project.
    2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants 
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition, 
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past 
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as 
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and 
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider 
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or 
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
    In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary 
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal 
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or 
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department 
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
    3. Additional Review and Selection Process Factors: In the past, 
the Department has had difficulty finding peer reviewers for certain 
competitions because so many individuals who are eligible to serve as 
peer reviewers have conflicts of interest. The standing panel 
requirements under section 682(b) of IDEA also have placed additional 
constraints on the availability of reviewers. Therefore, the Department 
has determined that for some discretionary grant competitions, 
applications may be separated into two or more groups and ranked and 
selected for funding within specific groups. This procedure will make 
it easier for the Department to find peer reviewers by ensuring that 
greater numbers of individuals who are eligible to serve as reviewers 
for any particular group of applicants will not have conflicts of 
interest. It also will increase the quality, independence, and fairness 
of the review process, while permitting panel members to review 
applications under discretionary grant competitions for which they also 
have submitted applications.
    4. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR 
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department 
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR 
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in 
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the 
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of 
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system 
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not 
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not 
responsible.
    5. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this 
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project 
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently 
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your 
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal 
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make 
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that 
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as 
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may 
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal 
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
    Please note that, if the total value of your currently active 
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the 
Federal government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity 
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2 
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal 
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.

[[Page 17565]]

VI. Award Administration Information

    1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your 
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award 
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to 
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally, 
also.
    If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding, 
we notify you.
    2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify 
administrative and national policy requirements in the application 
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable 
Regulations section of this notice.
    We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of 
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and 
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also 
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding 
commitments under the grant.
    3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you 
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to 
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in 
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of 
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those 
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent 
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or 
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works. 
Additionally, a grantee that is awarded competitive grant funds must 
have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables. This 
dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your 
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional 
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR 
3474.20.
    4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, 
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and 
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply 
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
    (b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final 
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the 
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual 
performance report that provides the most current performance and 
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34 
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance 
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting, 
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
    (c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee 
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In 
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
    5. Performance Measures: Under GPRA, the Department has established 
a set of performance measures, including long-term measures, that are 
designed to yield information on various aspects of the effectiveness 
and quality of the Personnel Development to Improve Services and 
Results for Children with Disabilities program. These measures include: 
(1) The percentage of preparation programs that incorporate 
scientifically or evidence-based practices into their curricula; (2) 
the percentage of scholars completing preparation programs who are 
knowledgeable and skilled in evidence-based practices that improve 
outcomes for children with disabilities; (3) the percentage of scholars 
who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic 
performance; (4) the percentage of scholars completing preparation 
programs who are working in the area(s) in which they were prepared 
upon program completion; and (5) the Federal cost per scholar who 
completed the preparation program.
    In addition, the Department will gather information on the 
following outcome measures: (1) The percentage of scholars who 
completed the preparation program and are employed in high-need 
districts; (2) the percentage of scholars who completed the preparation 
program and are employed in the field of special education for at least 
two years; and (3) the percentage of scholars who completed the 
preparation program and who are rated effective by their employers.
    Grantees may be asked to participate in assessing and providing 
information on these aspects of program quality.
    6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR 
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee 
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is 
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the 
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the 
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
    In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers 
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in 
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil 
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities 
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR 
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).

VII. Other Information

    Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this 
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format 
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to 
the program contact persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.
    Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this 
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may 
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of 
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this 
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published 
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To 
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at 
the site.
    You may also access documents of the Department published in the 
Federal Register by using the article search feature at 
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search 
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published 
by the Department.

Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration. Delegated the 
authority to perform the functions and duties of the Assistant 
Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative 
Services.
[FR Doc. 2020-06522 Filed 3-27-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4000-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.