Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 15763-15764 [2020-05756]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 54 / Thursday, March 19, 2020 / Notices Estimated Number of Respondents: 488. Estimated Time per Response: 10 hours. Needs and Uses: This collection of information is needed to detect violations of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and determine if an investigation or prosecution is necessary and to reach a settlement with violators. Voluntary self-disclosure of EAR violations strengthens BIS’s enforcement efforts by allowing BIS to conduct investigations of the disclosed incidents faster than would be the case if BIS had to detect the violations without such disclosures. BIS evaluates the seriousness of the violation and either (1) Informs the person making the disclosure that no action is warranted; (2) issues a warning letter; (3) issues a proposed charging letter and attempts to settle the matter; (4) issues a charging letter if settlement is not reached; and/ or (5) refers the matter to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Frequency: On Occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Dated: March 16, 2020. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2020–05716 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Voluntary SelfDisclosure of Antiboycott Violations The Department of Commerce will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), on or after the date of publication of this notice. The public is invited to submit comments on this request. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Mar 18, 2020 Jkt 250001 by using the search function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number 0694–0132. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [A–533–838] Copies of this submission may be obtained from Mark Crace, Bureau of Industry and Security, 1401 Constitution Avenue, Suite 2099B, Washington, DC 20233, or viewing the entire information collection request at www.reginfo.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) if the information will be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) the accuracy of the agency’s estimates of the burden and cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (4) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security. Title: Voluntary Self-Disclosure of Antiboycott Violations. Form Number(s): N/A. OMB Control Number: 0694–0132. Type of Review: Regular submission. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,220. Estimated Number of Respondents: 9. Estimated Time per Response: 10 to 600 hours. Needs and Uses: This collection of information supports enforcement of the Antiboycott provisions of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) by providing a method for industry to voluntarily self-disclose Antiboycott violations. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Frequency: On Occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Dated: March 13, 2020. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2020–05719 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am] International Trade Administration Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India for the period December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019. DATES: Applicable March 19, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2623. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On December 6, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from India for the period of review (POR) December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019.1 On December 31, 2019, Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite), an Indian producer and exporter of CVP 23, requested an administrative review of the order of CVP 23 from India with respect to its entries of subject merchandise during the POR.2 No other party requested an administrative review of this order. On February 6, 2020, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published the notice of initiation of an administrative review of the order on CVP 23 from India with respect to Pidilite.3 On March 3, 2020, Pidilite withdrew its request for an administrative review.4 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 66880 (December 6, 2019). 2 See Pidilite’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India—Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated December 31, 2019. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 6896 (February 6, 2020). 4 See Pidilite’s Letter, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India—Withdrawal of Request for Continued BILLING CODE 3510–33–P PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 15763 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1 15764 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 54 / Thursday, March 19, 2020 / Notices Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. In this case, Pidilite timely withdrew its request by the 90-day deadline, and no other party requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order. Therefore, we are rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from India for the period December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019, in its entirety, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Assessment Commerce intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of CVP 23 from India during the POR at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an Administrative Review and Request for Rescission,’’ dated March 3, 2020. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:05 Mar 18, 2020 Jkt 250001 APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We intend to issue and publish this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: March 16, 2020. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2020–05756 Filed 3–18–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–489–830] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Turkey: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey), covering the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. DATES: Applicable March 19, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathryn Turlo, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3870. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On July 1, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the CVD order on rebar from Turkey.1 On July 30, 2019, the Rebar Trade Action Coalition (the petitioner) timely requested that Commerce conduct an administrative review of Habas Sinai ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endustrisi A.S. (Habas).2 We received no other requests for review. On September 9, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register a 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 31296, 31296 (July 1, 2019). 2 See The petitioner’s letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated July 30, 2019. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 notice of initiation with respect to Habas, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).3 On September 11, 2019, Habas notified Commerce that it had no sales, shipments, or entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (POR).4 On October 31, 2019, Commerce issued a no shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to corroborate Habas’ claim.5 On March 2, 2020, Commerce notified all interested parties that CBP found no evidence of shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Habas during the POR.6 On March 5, 2020, Commerce established a period for comments regarding CBP’s findings.7 No parties submitted comments. Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce’s practice to rescind an administrative review of a CVD order where it concludes that there were no reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR.8 Normally, upon completion of an administrative review, the suspended entries are liquidated at the CVD assessment rate for the review period. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). Therefore, for an administrative review to be conducted, there must be a reviewable, suspended entry that Commerce can instruct CBP to liquidate at the calculated CVD assessment rate for the review period.9 As noted above, the CBP confirmed that there were no entries of subject merchandise during the POR with respect to Habas, the only exporter or producer subject to this administrative review.10 Accordingly, in 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 47242, 47254 (September 9, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 4 See Habas’ letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Turkey; Habas¸ no shipment letter,’’ dated September 11, 2019. 5 See Customs Instructions Message 9304317, dated October 31, 2019. 6 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Results of No Shipment Inquiry,’’ dated March 2, 2020. 7 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Deadline for Comments on Results of No Shipment Inquiry,’’ dated March 5, 2020. 8 See, e.g., Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017– 2018, 84 FR 54844, 54845 & n.8 (October 11, 2019) (citing Lightweight Thermal Paper from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017)). 9 See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 10 See, e.g., Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Results of E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM 19MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 54 (Thursday, March 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15763-15764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-838]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet 
pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India for the period December 1, 2018 through 
November 30, 2019.

DATES: Applicable March 19, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2623.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On December 6, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to 
request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 
23 from India for the period of review (POR) December 1, 2018 through 
November 30, 2019.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative 
Review, 84 FR 66880 (December 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 31, 2019, Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite), an 
Indian producer and exporter of CVP 23, requested an administrative 
review of the order of CVP 23 from India with respect to its entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR.\2\ No other party requested an 
administrative review of this order. On February 6, 2020, in accordance 
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published the notice of initiation of an 
administrative review of the order on CVP 23 from India with respect to 
Pidilite.\3\ On March 3, 2020, Pidilite withdrew its request for an 
administrative review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Pidilite's Letter, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from 
India--Request for Administrative Review,'' dated December 31, 2019.
    \3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 6896 (February 6, 2020).
    \4\ See Pidilite's Letter, ``Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from 
India--Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review and Request 
for Rescission,'' dated March 3, 2020.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 15764]]

Rescission of Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested 
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. In 
this case, Pidilite timely withdrew its request by the 90-day deadline, 
and no other party requested an administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order. Therefore, we are rescinding the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from India for the 
period December 1, 2018 through November 30, 2019, in its entirety, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).

Assessment

    Commerce intends to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of CVP 23 
from India during the POR at rates equal to the cash deposit of 
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this 
notice in the Federal Register.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We intend to issue and publish this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: March 16, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020-05756 Filed 3-18-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P