Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 14883-14885 [2020-05311]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473. Dated: March 10, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–05317 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–16–2020] lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 43—Battle Creek, Michigan; Notification of Proposed Production Activity; Zoetis, LLC (Pharmaceutical Products), Kalamazoo, Michigan Zoetis, LLC (Zoetis) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility in Kalamazoo, Michigan. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on March 9, 2020. Zoetis’ facility is located within FTZ 43. The facility is used for the production of pharmaceuticals for the animal pharmaceutical industry. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Zoetis from customs duty payments on the foreign-status components used in export production. On its domestic sales, for the foreignstatus materials/components noted below, Zoetis would be able to choose the duty rates during customs entry procedures that apply to: Apoquel® (atopic dermatitis); Stronghold® Plus (antiparasitic); Revolution Plus ® (antiparasitic); Versatrine® Pron (ectoparasiticide); Spot on Pron (ectoparasiticide); Coopers Spot on Pron (ectoparasiticide); Alphamax Conc Sol (parasiticide) and, Simparica TrioTM (antiparasitic) (duty rate ranges from duty-free to 6.5%). Zoetis would be able to avoid duty on foreign-status components which become scrap/waste. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign-status production equipment. The components and materials sourced from abroad include: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Mar 13, 2020 Jkt 250001 Oclacitinib maleate; saroloner; deltamethrin 1% solution; and, deltamethrin concentrate 10MG/ML (duty rate 6.5%). The request indicates that certain materials/components are subject to special duties Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is April 27, 2020. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov or (202) 482–1963. Dated: March 10, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–05315 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B–15–2020] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 106— Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Notification of Proposed Production Activity; PRO– PIPE USA, LLC (High-Density Polyethylene Pipe), Shawnee, Oklahoma PRO–PIPE USA, LLC (PRO–PIPE USA) submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility in Shawnee, Oklahoma. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on March 5, 2020. The PRO–PIPE USA facility is located within FTZ 106. The facility is used for the production of high-density polyethylene pipe. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material and component and the specific finished product described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt PRO–PIPE USA from customs duty payments on the foreign- PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14883 status component used in export production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status material/component noted below, PRO–PIPE USA would be able to choose the duty rate during customs entry procedures that applies to high-density polyethylene pipe (duty rate 3.1%). PRO–PIPE USA would be able to avoid duty on foreign-status components which become scrap/waste. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or reduced on foreign-status production equipment. The component/material sourced from abroad is resin (black high-density polyethylene) (duty rate 6.5%). The request indicates that the material/ component is subject to special duties under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301), depending on the country of origin. The applicable Section 301 decisions require subject merchandise to be admitted to FTZs in privileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.41). Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is April 27, 2020. A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov or (202) 482–1963. Dated: March 10, 2020. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–05316 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–824] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) (Jindal) made sales of subject merchandise below normal value, but that SRF Limited of India (SRF) did not make sale of subject merchandise below normal value. The AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 14884 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices period of review (POR) is July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. DATES: Applicable March 16, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 12, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 On December 30, 2019, we extended these final results from January 10, 2020 until March 10, 2020.2 Scope Of the Order The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film), whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET Film are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES We addressed all the issues raised in the case brief submitted by Jindal, the sole brief submitted by an interested party, in the the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 We provided a list of all the issues raised by Jindal in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR 48123 (September 12, 2019) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated December 30, 2019. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India; 2017–2018 Administrative Review,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Mar 13, 2020 Jkt 250001 registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our review of the record and comments received from Jindal regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain revisions to the Jindal’s home market and U.S. margin calculations.4 The Issues and Decision Memorandum contains additional details of these revisions. We also updated the export subsidies in the U.S. margin programs to account for changes in the concurrent countervailing duty administrative review for both Jindal and SRF.5 Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Manufacturer/exporter Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) ...... SRF Limited of India ................... Ester Industries Limited .............. Garware Polyester Ltd ................ Polyplex Corporation Ltd ............ Vacmet India Limited .................. WeightedAverage Margin (percent) 4.45 0.00 4.45 4.45 4.45 4.45 Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final results in accordance with section 751(a) and 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) (Jindal),’’ dated concurrently with this memorandum (Jindal Final Calculation Memorandum). 5 See Jindal Final Calculation Memo; see also Memorandum ’’ Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: SRF Limited,’’ dated concurrently with this memorandum. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for an importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondent’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For entries of subject merchandise produced by Jindal or SRF for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate established in the less-than fair value (LTFV) investigation, 5.71 percent,6 if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.7 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries produced and/or exported by SRF during the POR. We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company under review will be the rate established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the LTFV 6 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 44175 (July 1, 2002) (Amended Final Determination). 7 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012). E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices VII. Recommendation investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters is 5.71 percent.8 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. [FR Doc. 2020–05311 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Notification to Interested Parties Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221. Dated: March 10, 2020. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results VI. Discussion of Issues Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Grant All of Jindal’s PostSale Price Adjustments Comment 2: Whether to Revise Jindal’s Home Market and Margin Programs 8 See Amended Final Determination. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Mar 13, 2020 Jkt 250001 Proposed Information Collection; CostEarnings Survey of Mariana Archipelago Small Boat Fleet National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: To ensure consideration, written or on-line comments must be submitted on or before May 15, 2020. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Adrienne Thomas, PRA Officer, NOAA, 151 Patton Avenue, Room 159, Asheville, NC 28801 (or via the internet at PRAcomments@doc.gov). All comments received are part of the public record. Comments will generally be posted without change. All Personally Identifiable Information (for example, name and address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Justin Hospital, Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818, (808) 725–5399 or Justin.Hospital@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Abstract The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) proposes to collect information about fishing expenses and catch distribution (the share of fish that is sold, retained for home consumption, directed to customary exchange, etc.) for the Mariana Archipelago small boatbased reef fish, bottomfish, and pelagics fisheries with which to conduct economic analyses that will improve fishery management in those fisheries; PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14885 satisfy NMFS’ legal mandates under Executive Order 12866, the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act; and quantify achievement of the performance measures in the NMFS Strategic Operating Plans. Respondents will include small boat fishers across the Mariana Archipelago (Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands) and their participation in the economic data collection will be voluntary. These data will be used to assess how fishermen will be impacted by and respond to regulations likely to be considered by fishery managers. II. Method of Collection Paper-based survey forms will be completed by respondents or through in-person interviews. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0648–0755. Form Number(s): None. Type of Review: Regular submission [extension of a current information collection]. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations. Estimated Number of Respondents: 280. Estimated Time per Response: 45 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 210. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0 in recordkeeping/reporting costs. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 51 (Monday, March 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14883-14885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-824]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Jindal 
Poly Films Ltd. (India) (Jindal) made sales of subject merchandise 
below normal value, but that SRF Limited of India (SRF) did not make 
sale of subject merchandise below normal value. The

[[Page 14884]]

period of review (POR) is July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018.

DATES: Applicable March 16, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On September 12, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Results.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from 
India: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 84 FR 48123 (September 12, 
2019) (Preliminary Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 30, 2019, we extended these final results from January 
10, 2020 until March 10, 2020.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and 
Strip from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated December 30, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope Of the Order

    The products covered by the order are all gauges of raw, 
pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip 
(PET Film), whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metallized 
films and other finished films that have had at least one of their 
surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing 
resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports 
of PET Film are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. 
The written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    We addressed all the issues raised in the case brief submitted by 
Jindal, the sole brief submitted by an interested party, in the the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ We provided a list of all the issues 
raised by Jindal in the appendix to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film from India; 2017-2018 Administrative 
Review,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from Jindal 
regarding the Preliminary Results, we made certain revisions to the 
Jindal's home market and U.S. margin calculations.\4\ The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum contains additional details of these revisions. We 
also updated the export subsidies in the U.S. margin programs to 
account for changes in the concurrent countervailing duty 
administrative review for both Jindal and SRF.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review of Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip from India: Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India) (Jindal),'' dated 
concurrently with this memorandum (Jindal Final Calculation 
Memorandum).
    \5\ See Jindal Final Calculation Memo; see also Memorandum '' 
Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: SRF 
Limited,'' dated concurrently with this memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we determine the following weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period July 1, 2017 through June 
30, 2018.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                Average
                    Manufacturer/exporter                       Margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jindal Poly Films Ltd. (India)..............................        4.45
SRF Limited of India........................................        0.00
Ester Industries Limited....................................        4.45
Garware Polyester Ltd.......................................        4.45
Polyplex Corporation Ltd....................................        4.45
Vacmet India Limited........................................        4.45
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final 
results in accordance with section 751(a) and 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's 
weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less 
than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will 
calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates on the basis of 
the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for an importer's 
examined sales and the total entered value of such sales in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where either the respondent's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 
CFR 351.106(c), or an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard 
to antidumping duties.
    For entries of subject merchandise produced by Jindal or SRF for 
which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate established in the less-than fair value (LTFV) 
investigation, 5.71 percent,\6\ if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\7\ Pursuant to 
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard 
to antidumping duties any entries produced and/or exported by SRF 
during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR 
44175 (July 1, 2002) (Amended Final Determination).
    \7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET Film from India entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the company 
under review will be the rate established in the final results of this 
review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash deposit will 
be required); (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not 
listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter 
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the LTFV

[[Page 14885]]

investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of 
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters is 5.71 percent.\8\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Amended Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties Regarding the Reimbursement of 
Duties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: March 10, 2020.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. List of Issues
III. Background
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Changes Made Since the Preliminary Results
VI. Discussion of Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Grant All of 
Jindal's Post-Sale Price Adjustments
    Comment 2: Whether to Revise Jindal's Home Market and Margin 
Programs
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2020-05311 Filed 3-13-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P