Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Rules Related to the Complex Order Auction, 14984-14986 [2020-05234]
Download as PDF
14984
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices
ADMINISTRATIVE, TECHNICAL, AND PHYSICAL
SAFEGUARDS:
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
Paper records, computers, and
computer storage media are located in
controlled-access areas under
supervision of program personnel.
Access to these areas is limited to
authorized personnel, who must be
identified with a badge.
Access to records is limited to
individuals whose official duties require
such access. Contractors and licensees
are subject to contract controls and
unannounced on-site audits and
inspections.
Computers are protected by
mechanical locks, card key systems, or
other physical access control methods.
The use of computer systems is
regulated with installed security
software, computer logon
identifications, and operating system
controls including access controls,
terminal and transaction logging, and
file management software.
Key pairs are protected against
cryptanalysis by encrypting the private
key and by using a shared secret
algorithm to protect the encryption key,
and the certificate authority key is
stored in a separate, tamperproof,
hardware device. Activities are audited,
and archived information is protected
from corruption, deletion, and
modification.
For authentication services and
electronic postmark, electronic data is
transmitted via secure socket layer (SSL)
encryption to a secured data center.
Computer media are stored within a
secured, locked room within the facility.
Access to the database is limited to the
system administrator, database
administrator, and designated support
personnel. Paper forms are stored
within a secured area within locked
cabinets.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Requests for access must be made in
accordance with the Notification
Procedure above and USPS Privacy Act
regulations regarding access to records
and verification of identity under 39
CFR 266.5.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
See Notification Procedure and
Record Access Procedures above.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
Customers wanting to know if other
information about them is maintained in
this system of records must address
inquiries in writing to the system
manager. Inquiries must contain name,
address, email, and other identifying
information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
HISTORY:
December 13, 2018, 83 FR 64164;
December 22, 2017, 82 FR 60776;
August 29, 2014, 79 FR 51627; October
24, 2011, 76 FR 65756
*
*
*
*
*
Joshua J. Hofer,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–05232 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88348; File No. SR–CBOE–
2020–016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Its Rules
Related to the Complex Order Auction
March 10, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 6,
2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
its rules related to the Complex Order
Auction. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rule related to the Complex Order
Auction (‘‘COA’’) to (1) to add rule text
that was unintentionally omitted from
the post-migration Rulebook and (2)
increase the maximum Response Time
Interval period.
By way of background, On October 7,
2019, Cboe Options migrated its trading
platform to the same system used by its
affiliated exchanges 3 (the ‘‘migration’’).
In connection with this technology
migration, Cboe Options updated and
reorganized its entire Rulebook (the
‘‘post-migration Rulebook’’), including
rules related to COA,4 which became
effective upon the technology migration.
Current Subparagraph (3) of Rule
5.33(d) governs the Response Time
Interval, which is the period of time
during which Users may submit
responses to a COA auction message
(‘‘COA Responses’’). Rule 5.33(d)(3)
currently provides that ‘‘the Exchange
determines the duration of the Response
Time Interval, which may not exceed
500 milliseconds.’’ The Exchange notes
that the corresponding rule that was in
place just prior to migration, Rule
6.53C(d)(iii)(2), provided that the
Exchange ‘‘will determine the length of
the Response Time Interval on a classby-class basis; provided, however, that
the duration shall not exceed three (3)
seconds’’.5
3 For purposes of this rule filing, the Exchange’s
affiliated exchanges are Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘C2’’), acquired Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘EDGA’’), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’ or
‘‘EDGX Options’’), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘BZX Options’’), and Cboe BYX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX’’ and, together with Cboe
Options, C2, EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ‘‘Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges’’).
4 Current Rule 5.33(d) describes the COA process
for COA-eligible orders. Orders in all classes are
eligible to participate in COA. Upon receipt of a
COA-eligible order, the System initiates the COA
process by sending a COA auction message to all
subscribers to the Exchange’s data feeds that deliver
COA auction messages.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87015
(September 19, 2019), 84 FR 50504 (September 25,
2019)(SR–CBOE–2019–060).
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange first proposes to clarify
and explicitly provide in current Rule
5.33(d)(3) that the Exchange determines
the duration of the Response Time
Interval on a ‘‘class-by-class basis’’. As
indicated above, the proposed
clarification is consistent with the
Exchange’s rule governing Response
Time Intervals that was in place prior to
the technology migration on October 7,
2019. When the Exchange proposed
Rule 5.33(d) and incorporated it into the
post-migration Rulebook, it
inadvertently did not include the ‘‘classby-class basis’’ language, which the
Exchange now proposes to include.6
The Exchange believes it is appropriate
to add clarity back in the rules to avoid
potential confusion.
The Exchange next proposes to amend
the maximum duration of the Response
Time Interval. As indicated above, the
Response Time Interval cannot
currently exceed 500 milliseconds. Also
as mentioned above, pre-migration, the
Exchange’s rule provided for a
maximum Response Time Interval of 3
seconds. The Exchange believes that it
is in TPHs’ best interest to minimize the
response timer to a time frame that
continues to allow adequate time for the
TPHs to respond to a COA auction
message, as both the order being
exposed and the TPHs responding are
subject to market risk during the
response timer period. Indeed, the
Exchange had reduced the maximum
time period from 3 seconds to 500
milliseconds as the Exchange’s timer
was (and currently still is) set at 100
milliseconds, and the Exchange
therefore didn’t believe it was necessary
to maintain a maximum of 3 seconds.7
After further evaluation however, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to
reinstate the 3 second maximum. For
example, during times of extreme
market volatility, there may be
increased message traffic, which could
potentially result in a delay of
processing of COA responses. In such
instances, the Exchange believes a
response timer of 500 milliseconds may
be inadequate. As such, to ensure
participants can respond to, and the
system can process, COA responses in a
sufficient amount of time, the Exchange
proposes to reinstate the maximum
Response Time Interval period to 3
seconds (i.e., 3000 milliseconds).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposed rule change to add rule
text that was inadvertently omitted from
the post-migration Rulebook is designed
to protect investors by ensuring that its
rule relating to COA accurately
references and reflects the current, postmigration Rules in place, thereby
mitigating any potential investor
confusion. The Exchange believes this
change will have no impact on trading
on the Exchange, as it is merely
clarifying that the Exchange can
determine the duration of a Response
Time Interval on a class-by-class basis,
notwithstanding its inadvertent
omission to carry over such language in
the relocated COA rules post-migration.
Indeed, the proposed rule change
provides clarity and transparency in the
rules, which may alleviate potential
confusion, thereby protecting investors
by removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanisms of a free and
open market and a national market
system.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
reinstate the Response Time Interval
maximum period to 3 seconds promotes
just and equitable principles of trade
and removes impediments to a free and
open market because it allows the
Exchange to provide increased time for
Trading Permit Holders participating in
a COA to submit COA responses and
have such responses processed by the
Exchange in a timely manner, and could
encourage competition among
participants, thereby enhancing the
potential for price improvement for
complex orders in the COA to the
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 Id.
6 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
benefit of investors and public interest.
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is not unfairly
discriminatory because it establishes a
maximum Response Time Interval
period applicable to all Exchange
participants participating in a COA. The
Exchange also notes the proposed
maximum timer is the same as the timer
previously allowed by the Exchange
premigration, just six months ago.11
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended as
a competitive filing. Rather, the
proposed rule change to clarify that the
Response Time Interval may be set on
a class-by-class basis is corrective in
nature and merely updates a rule to add
language it inadvertently omitted in
connection with its migration-related
rulebook change. The proposed change
to reinstate the pre-migration maximum
Response Time Interval period is also
not designed to address any aspect of
competition, but instead would
continue to provide market participants
with sufficient time to respond,
compete, and provide price
improvement for orders entered into
COA. The proposed rule change merely
reinstates the pre-migration maximum
to provide the Exchange further
flexibility to ensure Trading Permit
Holders have sufficient time to submit,
and the Exchange has sufficient time to
process, COA responses. The proposed
rule change also offers the same
response timer period to all TPHs and
would not impose a competitive burden
on any particular participant.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87015
(September 19, 2019), 84 FR 50504 (September 25,
2019)(SR–CBOE–2019–060).
9 15
7 Id.
14985
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
14986
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 51 / Monday, March 16, 2020 / Notices
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 12 and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.13
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 14 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 15
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange represents that waiver of the
operative delay would add rule text that
was omitted from the post-migration
Rulebook and reinstate a maximum
Response Time Interval that was in
place pre-migration. The Exchange
states that in times of extreme market
volatility, there may be increased
message traffic which could potentially
result in a delay of processing of COA
responses, and the proposed change
would help ensure that participants can
respond to (and the exchange’s systems
can process) COA responses in a
sufficient amount of time. The
Commission notes that the proposed
rule change does not present any unique
or novel regulatory issues. Accordingly,
the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission has waived the fiveday prefiling requirement in this case.
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
13 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Mar 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number
SR–CBOE–2020–016 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2020–016. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2020–016 and
should be submitted on or before April
6, 2020.
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2020–05234 Filed 3–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88351; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2019–076]
Electronic Comments
PO 00000
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
Sfmt 4703
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To
List and Trade Shares of the
Clearbridge Small Cap Value ETF
Under BZX Rule 14.11(k)
March 10, 2020.
On September 26, 2019, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder, 2 a
proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of the Clearbridge Small Cap
Value ETF under BZX Rule 14.11(k)
(Managed Portfolio Shares). On October
9, 2019, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change,
which amended and replaced the rule
change in its entirety.
The proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on October 17, 2019.3 On
November 21, 2019, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.5 On January 13,
2020, the Commission instituted
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Exchange Act 6 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.7 The Commission
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87286
(Oct. 10, 2019), 84 FR 55608.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87581,
84 FR 65434 (Nov. 27, 2019). The Commission
designated January 15, 2020, as the date by which
the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87951,
85 FR 3099 (Jan. 17, 2020).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 51 (Monday, March 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14984-14986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05234]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88348; File No. SR-CBOE-2020-016]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Its Rules Related to the Complex Order Auction
March 10, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 6, 2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend its rules related to the Complex Order Auction. The text of
the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its rule related to the Complex
Order Auction (``COA'') to (1) to add rule text that was
unintentionally omitted from the post-migration Rulebook and (2)
increase the maximum Response Time Interval period.
By way of background, On October 7, 2019, Cboe Options migrated its
trading platform to the same system used by its affiliated exchanges
\3\ (the ``migration''). In connection with this technology migration,
Cboe Options updated and reorganized its entire Rulebook (the ``post-
migration Rulebook''), including rules related to COA,\4\ which became
effective upon the technology migration. Current Subparagraph (3) of
Rule 5.33(d) governs the Response Time Interval, which is the period of
time during which Users may submit responses to a COA auction message
(``COA Responses''). Rule 5.33(d)(3) currently provides that ``the
Exchange determines the duration of the Response Time Interval, which
may not exceed 500 milliseconds.'' The Exchange notes that the
corresponding rule that was in place just prior to migration, Rule
6.53C(d)(iii)(2), provided that the Exchange ``will determine the
length of the Response Time Interval on a class-by-class basis;
provided, however, that the duration shall not exceed three (3)
seconds''.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For purposes of this rule filing, the Exchange's affiliated
exchanges are Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), acquired Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or
``EDGX Options''), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or ``BZX
Options''), and Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'' and, together with
Cboe Options, C2, EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ``Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges'').
\4\ Current Rule 5.33(d) describes the COA process for COA-
eligible orders. Orders in all classes are eligible to participate
in COA. Upon receipt of a COA-eligible order, the System initiates
the COA process by sending a COA auction message to all subscribers
to the Exchange's data feeds that deliver COA auction messages.
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87015 (September 19,
2019), 84 FR 50504 (September 25, 2019)(SR-CBOE-2019-060).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 14985]]
The Exchange first proposes to clarify and explicitly provide in
current Rule 5.33(d)(3) that the Exchange determines the duration of
the Response Time Interval on a ``class-by-class basis''. As indicated
above, the proposed clarification is consistent with the Exchange's
rule governing Response Time Intervals that was in place prior to the
technology migration on October 7, 2019. When the Exchange proposed
Rule 5.33(d) and incorporated it into the post-migration Rulebook, it
inadvertently did not include the ``class-by-class basis'' language,
which the Exchange now proposes to include.\6\ The Exchange believes it
is appropriate to add clarity back in the rules to avoid potential
confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange next proposes to amend the maximum duration of the
Response Time Interval. As indicated above, the Response Time Interval
cannot currently exceed 500 milliseconds. Also as mentioned above, pre-
migration, the Exchange's rule provided for a maximum Response Time
Interval of 3 seconds. The Exchange believes that it is in TPHs' best
interest to minimize the response timer to a time frame that continues
to allow adequate time for the TPHs to respond to a COA auction
message, as both the order being exposed and the TPHs responding are
subject to market risk during the response timer period. Indeed, the
Exchange had reduced the maximum time period from 3 seconds to 500
milliseconds as the Exchange's timer was (and currently still is) set
at 100 milliseconds, and the Exchange therefore didn't believe it was
necessary to maintain a maximum of 3 seconds.\7\ After further
evaluation however, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to
reinstate the 3 second maximum. For example, during times of extreme
market volatility, there may be increased message traffic, which could
potentially result in a delay of processing of COA responses. In such
instances, the Exchange believes a response timer of 500 milliseconds
may be inadequate. As such, to ensure participants can respond to, and
the system can process, COA responses in a sufficient amount of time,
the Exchange proposes to reinstate the maximum Response Time Interval
period to 3 seconds (i.e., 3000 milliseconds).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change to add rule text that was inadvertently
omitted from the post-migration Rulebook is designed to protect
investors by ensuring that its rule relating to COA accurately
references and reflects the current, post-migration Rules in place,
thereby mitigating any potential investor confusion. The Exchange
believes this change will have no impact on trading on the Exchange, as
it is merely clarifying that the Exchange can determine the duration of
a Response Time Interval on a class-by-class basis, notwithstanding its
inadvertent omission to carry over such language in the relocated COA
rules post-migration. Indeed, the proposed rule change provides clarity
and transparency in the rules, which may alleviate potential confusion,
thereby protecting investors by removing impediments to and perfecting
the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system.
The Exchange believes the proposal to reinstate the Response Time
Interval maximum period to 3 seconds promotes just and equitable
principles of trade and removes impediments to a free and open market
because it allows the Exchange to provide increased time for Trading
Permit Holders participating in a COA to submit COA responses and have
such responses processed by the Exchange in a timely manner, and could
encourage competition among participants, thereby enhancing the
potential for price improvement for complex orders in the COA to the
benefit of investors and public interest. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is not unfairly discriminatory because it
establishes a maximum Response Time Interval period applicable to all
Exchange participants participating in a COA. The Exchange also notes
the proposed maximum timer is the same as the timer previously allowed
by the Exchange premigration, just six months ago.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87015 (September
19, 2019), 84 FR 50504 (September 25, 2019)(SR-CBOE-2019-060).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended as a competitive filing. Rather, the proposed rule change
to clarify that the Response Time Interval may be set on a class-by-
class basis is corrective in nature and merely updates a rule to add
language it inadvertently omitted in connection with its migration-
related rulebook change. The proposed change to reinstate the pre-
migration maximum Response Time Interval period is also not designed to
address any aspect of competition, but instead would continue to
provide market participants with sufficient time to respond, compete,
and provide price improvement for orders entered into COA. The proposed
rule change merely reinstates the pre-migration maximum to provide the
Exchange further flexibility to ensure Trading Permit Holders have
sufficient time to submit, and the Exchange has sufficient time to
process, COA responses. The proposed rule change also offers the same
response timer period to all TPHs and would not impose a competitive
burden on any particular participant.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on
[[Page 14986]]
which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii)
of the Act \12\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Commission has waived the five-day prefiling requirement in this
case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \14\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \15\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
The Exchange represents that waiver of the operative delay would add
rule text that was omitted from the post-migration Rulebook and
reinstate a maximum Response Time Interval that was in place pre-
migration. The Exchange states that in times of extreme market
volatility, there may be increased message traffic which could
potentially result in a delay of processing of COA responses, and the
proposed change would help ensure that participants can respond to (and
the exchange's systems can process) COA responses in a sufficient
amount of time. The Commission notes that the proposed rule change does
not present any unique or novel regulatory issues. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2020-016 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-016. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-016 and should be submitted on
or before April 6, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-05234 Filed 3-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P