Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, 11962-11965 [2020-04120]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
11962
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
cutting, notching, punching, drilling,
painting, staining, finishing, assembly, or any
other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of
the investigation if performed in the country
of manufacture of the in-scope product.
Excluded from the scope of this
investigation, if entered separate from a
wooden cabinet or vanity are:
(1) Aftermarket accessory items which may
be added to or installed into an interior of a
cabinet and which are not considered a
structural or core component of a wooden
cabinet or vanity. Aftermarket accessory
items may be made of wood, metal, plastic,
composite material, or a combination thereof
that can be inserted into a cabinet and which
are utilized in the function of organization/
accessibility on the interior of a cabinet; and
include:
• Inserts or dividers which are placed into
drawer boxes with the purpose of organizing
or dividing the internal portion of the drawer
into multiple areas for the purpose of
containing smaller items such as cutlery,
utensils, bathroom essentials, etc.etc.
• Round or oblong inserts that rotate
internally in a cabinet for the purpose of
accessibility to foodstuffs, dishware, general
supplies, etc.
(2) Solid wooden accessories including
corbels and rosettes, which serve the primary
purpose of decoration and personalization.
(3) Non-wooden cabinet hardware
components including metal hinges,
brackets, catches, locks, drawer slides,
fasteners (nails, screws, tacks, staples),
handles, and knobs.
(4) Medicine cabinets that meet all of the
following five criteria are excluded from the
scope: (1) Wall mounted; (2) assembled at the
time of entry into the United States; (3)
contain one or more mirrors; (4) be packaged
for retail sale at time of entry; and (5) have
a maximum depth of seven inches.
Also excluded from the scope of this
investigation are:
(1) All products covered by the scope of
the antidumping duty order on Wooden
Bedroom Furniture from the People’s
Republic of China. See Notice of Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329
(January 4, 2005).
(2) All products covered by the scope of
the antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on Hardwood Plywood from the
People’s Republic of China. See Certain
Hardwood Plywood Products from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
504 (January 4, 2018); Certain Hardwood
Plywood Products from the People’s Republic
of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR.
513 (January 4, 2018).
Imports of subject merchandise are
classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) statistical
numbers 9403.40.9060 and 9403.60.8081.
The subject component parts of wooden
cabinets and vanities may be entered into the
United States under HTSUS statistical
number 9403.90.7080. Although the HTSUS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–107]
Appendix II
Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope of the Investigation
V. Scope Comments
VI. Use of Adverse Facts Available
VII. Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
VIII. Adjustments Under Section 777A(f) of
the Act
IX. Adjustments to Cash Deposit Rates for
Export Subsidies
X. Discussion of the Issues
General Comments
Comment 1: Initiation of the Investigation
Comment 2: Respondent Selection
Comment 3: Separate Rate Applicants
Comment 4: Company Name for Supree
(Fujian) Wood Co., Ltd. (Supree)
Comment 5: Calculation of the Separate
Rate Assigned to Non-Selected
Companies
Surrogate Value (SV) Comments
Comment 6: Surrogate Country
Comment 7: SVs for Birch and Poplar
Comment 8: Calculation of Financial Ratios
Comment 9: Labor Rate Calculation
Company-Specific Comments
Ancientree
Comment 10: Whether to Apply AFA to
Ancientree
Comment 11: Treatment of Jiangsu Hongjia
Wood Ltd. (Jiangsu Hongjia) as an
Affiliate
Comment 12: SV Selections
Foremost
Comment 13: Combination Kits
Comment 14: Exempted Sales
Comment 15: Early Payment Discounts
Comment 16: Section 301 Duties
Comment 17: Foremost’s U.S. Inland
Freight Charges from the Port to the
Warehouse
Comment 18: Foremost’s U.S. Inland
Freight Charges to the Customer
Comment 19: FGI’s Acquisition Costs
Comment 20: Labor Hours
Comment 21: Calculation and Programing
Revisions
Meisen
Comment 22: Total AFA for Meisen
XI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–04121 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and/or exporters
of wooden cabinets and vanities and
componets thereof (wooden cabinets
and vanities) from the People’s Republic
of China (China).
DATES: Applicable February 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin Neuman or Benito Ballesteros,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0486 or
(202) 482–7425, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 12, 2019, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination in this investigation.1
The petitioner is the American Kitchen
Cabinet Alliance. In addition to the
Government of China (GOC), the
mandatory respondents in this
investigation are The Ancientree
Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), Dalian
Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd.
(Meisen), and Rizhao Foremost
Woodwork Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(Foremost).
A summary of the events that
occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a
full discussion of the issues raised by
parties for this final determination, are
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.2 The Issues and Decision
1 See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof From the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination, and Alignment of Final
Determination With Final Antidumping Duty
Determination, 84 FR 39798 (August 12, 2019)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Certain
Fabricated Structural Steel from the People’s
Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is
July 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are wooden cabinets and
vanities from China. For a complete
description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope
Decision Memorandum.3 Several
interested parties submitted case and
rebuttal briefs concerning the scope of
this investigation. For a summary of the
product coverage comments and
rebuttal comments submitted to the
record for this final determination, and
accompanying discussion and analysis
of all comments timely received, see the
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.4
Based on the comments received,
Commerce is not modifying the scope
language as it appeared in the
Preliminary Determination. The scope
in Appendix I remains unchanged from
that which appeared in the Preliminary
Determination.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation, and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by
parties in this investigation, are
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues that
parties raised is attached to this notice
as Appendix II.
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Wooden Cabinets
and Vanities and Components Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Scope Comments
Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determinations,’’ dated October 2, 2019
(Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Wooden Cabinets and
Vanities and Components Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Scope Comments Decision
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, Commerce determines
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.5 For a
full description of the methodology
underlying our final determination, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
calculated individual estimated subsidy
rates for Ancientree, Foremost and
Meisen. Additionally, consistent with
the Preliminary Determination, we
relied on adverse facts available (AFA)
to assign subsidy rates to Henan AiDiJia
Furniture Co., Ltd (AiDiJia) and Deway
International Trade Co., Ltd (Deway),
because they failed to respond to
Commerce’s requests for information.6
Verification
As provided for under section 782(i)
of the Act, Commerce verified the
information reported by Ancientree,
Foremost, and Meisen. We used
standard verification procedures,
including an examination of relevant
accounting records and original source
documents provided by the
respondents.7
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our review and analysis of
the comments received from parties,
minor corrections presented at
verification, and our verification
findings, we made certain changes to
the subsidy rate calculations for the
respondents. As a result of the changes
to the respondents’ calculated rates,
Commerce has revised the all-others
5 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
6 See Preliminary Determination PDM at 10–11
(noting that Commerce relied on AFA to assign a
subsidy rate to Deway, because it failed to respond
to our quantity and value questionnaire, and also
relied on AFA to assign a subsidy rate to AiDiJia,
because it failed to respond to our full
questionnaire).
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the
Questionnaire Responses of Dalian Meisen
Woodworking Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 3, 2020;
Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty Investigation
of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components
Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of The
Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January 7,
2020; and Memorandum, ‘‘Verification of the
Questionnaire Responses of Rizhao Foremost
Woodwork Manufacturing Co., Ltd.,’’ dated January
7, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11963
rate. Commerce has also revised the
total AFA rate. For a discussion of these
changes, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the Final Calculation
Memoranda.8
Final Determination
As noted above, we calculated
individual estimated subsidy rates for
Ancientree, Foremost and Meisen, and
relied on AFA to assign subsidy rates to
AiDiJia and Deway, because they failed
to respond to Commerce’s requests for
information.
Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act
states that, for companies not
individually investigated, Commerce
will determine an all-others rate equal
to the weighted-average countervailable
subsidy rates established for exporters
and/or producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis countervailable subsidy rates,
and any rates determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. However, as we
do not have publicly-ranged sales data
for all three of the participating
company respondents, we are using a
simple average of the calculated subsidy
rates to establish the all-others rate.
Commerce determines the total
estimated net countervailable subsidy
rates to be the following:
Company
The Ancientree Cabinet Co.,
Ltd 9 ...................................
Dalian Meisen Woodworking
Co., Ltd 10 ..........................
Subsidy rate
(percent)
13.33
18.27
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: Ancientree Final Determination Calculation
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice; Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: Foremost Final Determination Calculation
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice; and Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: Meisen Final Determination Calculation
Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(collectively, Final Calculation Memoranda).
9 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, Commerce has found the following
companies to be cross-owned with Ancientree:
Jiangsu Hongjia Wood Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Hongjia
Wood Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch, and Shanghai
Hongjia Wood Co., Ltd.
10 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, Commerce has found the following
company to be cross-owned with Dalian Meisen:
Dalian Hechang Technology Development Co., Ltd.
11 As discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, Commerce has found the following
companies to be cross-owned with Rizhao
Foremost: Foremost Worldwide Co., Ltd., and
Rizhao Foremost Landbridge Wood Industries Co.,
Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
11964
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
material injury, by reason of imports of
wooden cabinets and vanities from
China no later than 45 days after our
Rizhao Foremost Woodwork
final determination. If the ITC
Manufacturing Company
determines that material injury or threat
11
Ltd
.................................
31.18
of material injury does not exist, the
Deway International Trade
Co., Ltd .............................
293.45 proceeding will be terminated and all
cash deposits will be refunded. If the
Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co.,
Ltd .....................................
293.45 ITC determines that such injury does
All Others ..............................
20.93 exist, Commerce will issue a CVD order
directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce,
Disclosure
countervailing duties on all imports of
We intend to disclose to parties the
the subject merchandise entered, or
calculations performed in this
withdrawn from warehouse, for
proceeding within five days of any
consumption on or after the effective
public announcement of this notice in
date of the suspension of liquidation, as
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
discussed above in the ‘‘Continuation of
Continuation of Suspension of
Suspension of Liquidation’’ section.
Liquidation
Notification Regarding Administrative
As a result of our Preliminary
Protective Order (APO)
Determination and pursuant to sections
In the event that the ITC issues a final
703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act,
negative injury determination, this
Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and
notice will serve as the only reminder
Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
to parties subject to the APO of their
liquidation of entries of subject
responsibility concerning the
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
destruction of proprietary information
from warehouse, for consumption on or
disclosed under APO in accordance
after August 12, 2019, the date of
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
publication of the Preliminary
written notification of the return/
Determination in the Federal Register.
destruction of APO materials or
In accordance with section 703(d) of the
conversion to judicial protective order is
Act, we issued instructions to CBP to
hereby requested. Failure to comply
discontinue the suspension of
with the regulations and terms of an
liquidation for subject merchandise
APO is a violation which is subject to
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
sanction.
on or after December 9, 2019, but to
Notification to Interested Parties
continue the suspension of liquidation
of all entries from August 12, 2019
This determination is issued and
through December 8, 2019.
published pursuant to sections 705(d)
If the U.S. International Trade
and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
Commission (ITC) issues a final
351.210(c).
affirmative injury determination, we
Dated: February 21, 2020.
intend to issue a countervailing duty
(CVD) order, reinstate the suspension of Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
liquidation under section 706(a) of the
Compliance.
Act, and require a cash deposit of
estimated countervailing duties for
Appendix I
entries of subject merchandise in the
Scope of the Investigation
amounts indicated above. If the ITC
The merchandise subject to this
determines that material injury, or
investigation consists of wooden cabinets
threat of material injury, does not exist,
and vanities that are for permanent
this proceeding will be terminated and
installation (including floor mounted, wall
all estimated duties deposited or
mounted, ceiling hung or by attachment of
securities posted as a result of the
plumbing), and wooden components thereof.
suspension of liquidation will be
Wooden cabinets and vanities and wooden
refunded or canceled.
components are made substantially of wood
Company
Subsidy rate
(percent)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
determination. Because the final
determination in this proceeding is
affirmative, in accordance with section
705(b) of the Act, the ITC will make its
final determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States
is materially injured, or threatened with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
products, including solid wood and
engineered wood products (including those
made from wood particles, fibers, or other
wooden materials such as plywood, strand
board, block board, particle board, or
fiberboard), or bamboo. Wooden cabinets and
vanities consist of a cabinet box (which
typically includes a top, bottom, sides, back,
base blockers, ends/end panels, stretcher
rails, toe kicks, and/or shelves) and may or
may not include a frame, door, drawers and/
or shelves. Subject merchandise includes
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
wooden cabinets and vanities with or
without wood veneers, wood, paper or other
overlays, or laminates, with or without nonwood components or trim such as metal,
marble, glass, plastic, or other resins,
whether or not surface finished or
unfinished, and whether or not completed.
Wooden cabinets and vanities are covered
by the investigation whether or not they are
imported attached to, or in conjunction with,
faucets, metal plumbing, sinks and/or sink
bowls, or countertops. If wooden cabinets or
vanities are imported attached to, or in
conjunction with, such merchandise, only
the wooden cabinet or vanity is covered by
the scope.
Subject merchandise includes the
following wooden component parts of
cabinets and vanities: (1) Wooden cabinet
and vanity frames (2) wooden cabinet and
vanity boxes (which typically include a top,
bottom, sides, back, base blockers, ends/end
panels, stretcher rails, toe kicks, and/or
shelves), (3) wooden cabinet or vanity doors,
(4) wooden cabinet or vanity drawers and
drawer components (which typically include
sides, backs, bottoms, and faces), (5) back
panels and end panels, (6) and desks,
shelves, and tables that are attached to or
incorporated in the subject merchandise.
Subject merchandise includes all
unassembled, assembled and/or ‘‘ready to
assemble’’ (RTA) wooden cabinets and
vanities, also commonly known as ‘‘flat
packs,’’ except to the extent such
merchandise is already covered by the scope
of antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on Hardwood Plywood from the
People’s Republic of China. See Certain
Hardwood Plywood Products from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
504 (January 4, 2018); Certain Hardwood
Plywood Products from the People’s Republic
of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR
513 (January 4, 2018). RTA wooden cabinets
and vanities are defined as cabinets or
vanities packaged so that at the time of
importation they may include: (1) Wooden
components required to assemble a cabinet or
vanity (including drawer faces and doors);
and (2) parts (e.g., screws, washers, dowels,
nails, handles, knobs, adhesive glues)
required to assemble a cabinet or vanity.
RTAs may enter the United States in one or
in multiple packages.
Subject merchandise also includes wooden
cabinets and vanities and in-scope
components that have been further processed
in a third country, including but not limited
to one or more of the following: trimming,
cutting, notching, punching, drilling,
painting, staining, finishing, assembly, or any
other processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope of
the investigation if performed in the country
of manufacture of the in-scope product.
Excluded from the scope of this
investigation, if entered separate from a
wooden cabinet or vanity are:
(1) Aftermarket accessory items which may
be added to or installed into an interior of a
cabinet and which are not considered a
structural or core component of a wooden
cabinet or vanity. Aftermarket accessory
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 40 / Friday, February 28, 2020 / Notices
items may be made of wood, metal, plastic,
composite material, or a combination thereof
that can be inserted into a cabinet and which
are utilized in the function of organization/
accessibility on the interior of a cabinet; and
include:
• Inserts or dividers which are placed into
drawer boxes with the purpose of organizing
or dividing the internal portion of the drawer
into multiple areas for the purpose of
containing smaller items such as cutlery,
utensils, bathroom essentials, etc.
• Round or oblong inserts that rotate
internally in a cabinet for the purpose of
accessibility to foodstuffs, dishware, general
supplies, etc.
(2) Solid wooden accessories including
corbels and rosettes, which serve the primary
purpose of decoration and personalization.
(3) Non-wooden cabinet hardware
components including metal hinges,
brackets, catches, locks, drawer slides,
fasteners (nails, screws, tacks, staples),
handles, and knobs.
(4) Medicine cabinets that meet all of the
following five criteria are excluded from the
scope: (1) Wall mounted; (2) assembled at the
time of entry into the United States; (3)
contain one or more mirrors; (4) be packaged
for retail sale at time of entry; and (5) have
a maximum depth of seven inches.
Also excluded from the scope of this
investigation are:
(1) All products covered by the scope of
the antidumping duty order on Wooden
Bedroom Furniture from the People’s
Republic of China. See Notice of Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329
(January 4, 2005).
(2) All products covered by the scope of
the antidumping and countervailing duty
orders on Hardwood Plywood from the
People’s Republic of China. See Certain
Hardwood Plywood Products from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR
504 (January 4, 2018); Certain Hardwood
Plywood Products from the People’s Republic
of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR.
513 (January 4, 2018).
Imports of subject merchandise are
classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) statistical
numbers 9403.40.9060 and 9403.60.8081.
The subject component parts of wooden
cabinets and vanities may be entered into the
United States under HTSUS statistical
number 9403.90.7080. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Use of Adverse Facts Available
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Feb 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Initiation of the Investigation
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to the Provision of
Electricity for Less than Adequate
Remuneration (LTAR) Program
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to Find the Export Buyer’s
Credit (EBC) Program Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether the Policy Loans to
the Wooden Cabinet and Vanity Industry
Program Is Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Land Prices in
Thailand Provide a Suitable Benchmark
for Land Prices in China
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to the Provision of Inputs for
LTAR
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to Self-Reported Subsidies
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust Its Plywood Benchmark
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Apply AFA to Meisen
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should
Continue to Find that Meisen Was
Uncreditworthy
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail Subsidies Received by
Foremost’s Tolling Companies
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should
Continue to Find that Foremost Was
Uncreditworthy
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–04120 Filed 2–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–891, A–580–904]
Forged Steel Fittings From India and
the Republic of Korea: Postponement
of Preliminary Determinations in the
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable February 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caitlin Monks at (202) 482–2670, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 12, 2019, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
initiated less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigations of imports of forged steel
fittings from India and the Republic of
Korea.1 Currently, the preliminary
1 See Forged Steel Fittings from India and the
Republic of Korea: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11965
determinations are due no later than
March 31, 2020.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
Commerce to issue the preliminary
determination in an LTFV investigation
within 140 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation.
However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act
permits Commerce to postpone the
preliminary determination until no later
than 190 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation if:
(A) The petitioner makes a timely
request for a postponement; or (B)
Commerce concludes that the parties
concerned are cooperating, that the
investigation is extraordinarily
complicated, and that additional time is
necessary to make a preliminary
determination. Under 19 CFR
351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a
request for postponement 25 days or
more before the scheduled date of the
preliminary determination and must
state the reasons for the request.
Commerce will grant the request unless
it finds compelling reasons to deny the
request.
On February 5, 2020, the petitioners 2
submitted timely requests that
Commerce postpone the preliminary
determinations in these LTFV
investigations.3 The petitioners request
postponement because ‘‘based on the
complexity of the process for selecting
mandatory respondents in this
investigation, Commerce will not have
complete questionnaire responses and
sufficient information to issue
preliminary determinations if the
deadlines are not extended.’’ 4
For the reasons stated above and
because there are no compelling reasons
to deny the request, Commerce, in
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of
the Act, is postponing the deadline for
the preliminary determinations by 50
days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
which these investigations were
initiated). As a result, Commerce will
issue its preliminary determinations no
later than May 20, 2020. In accordance
with section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the
Value Investigations, 84 FR 64265 (November 21,
2019).
2 The petitioners are Bonney Forge Corporation
and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and
Service Workers International Union (USW).
3 See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Forged Steel Fittings
from India: Request for Extension of Preliminary
Determination,’’ and ‘‘Forged Steel Fittings from
Korea: Request for Extension of Preliminary
Determination,’’ both dated February 5, 2020.
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11962-11965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04120]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-107]
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From the
People's Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and/or
exporters of wooden cabinets and vanities and componets thereof (wooden
cabinets and vanities) from the People's Republic of China (China).
DATES: Applicable February 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Neuman or Benito Ballesteros,
AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0486 or (202)
482-7425, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 12, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary
Determination in this investigation.\1\ The petitioner is the American
Kitchen Cabinet Alliance. In addition to the Government of China (GOC),
the mandatory respondents in this investigation are The Ancientree
Cabinet Co., Ltd. (Ancientree), Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd.
(Meisen), and Rizhao Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(Foremost).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof From
the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment of Final
Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 84 FR 39798
(August 12, 2019) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues
raised by parties for this final determination, are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice.\2\ The Issues and Decision
[[Page 11963]]
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from the People's Republic of
China,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation (POI) is July 1, 2018 through December
31, 2018.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this investigation are wooden cabinets and
vanities from China. For a complete description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Scope Comments
Commerce issued a Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum.\3\ Several
interested parties submitted case and rebuttal briefs concerning the
scope of this investigation. For a summary of the product coverage
comments and rebuttal comments submitted to the record for this final
determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments
timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\4\ Based on
the comments received, Commerce is not modifying the scope language as
it appeared in the Preliminary Determination. The scope in Appendix I
remains unchanged from that which appeared in the Preliminary
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Determinations,''
dated October 2, 2019 (Preliminary Scope Decision Memorandum).
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and
Components Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Final Scope
Comments Decision Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice
(Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
The subsidy programs under investigation, and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs submitted by parties in this
investigation, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues that parties raised is attached to this notice as
Appendix II.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found countervailable, Commerce determines that there
is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.\5\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our
final determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
calculated individual estimated subsidy rates for Ancientree, Foremost
and Meisen. Additionally, consistent with the Preliminary
Determination, we relied on adverse facts available (AFA) to assign
subsidy rates to Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co., Ltd (AiDiJia) and Deway
International Trade Co., Ltd (Deway), because they failed to respond to
Commerce's requests for information.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Preliminary Determination PDM at 10-11 (noting that
Commerce relied on AFA to assign a subsidy rate to Deway, because it
failed to respond to our quantity and value questionnaire, and also
relied on AFA to assign a subsidy rate to AiDiJia, because it failed
to respond to our full questionnaire).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
As provided for under section 782(i) of the Act, Commerce verified
the information reported by Ancientree, Foremost, and Meisen. We used
standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant
accounting records and original source documents provided by the
respondents.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire
Responses of Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd.,'' dated January 3,
2020; Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Wooden
Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof from the People's
Republic of China: Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of
The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd.,'' dated January 7, 2020; and
Memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Rizhao
Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Co., Ltd.,'' dated January 7, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our review and analysis of the comments received from
parties, minor corrections presented at verification, and our
verification findings, we made certain changes to the subsidy rate
calculations for the respondents. As a result of the changes to the
respondents' calculated rates, Commerce has revised the all-others
rate. Commerce has also revised the total AFA rate. For a discussion of
these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum and the Final
Calculation Memoranda.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof from the
People's Republic of China: Ancientree Final Determination
Calculation Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice;
Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Wooden Cabinets
and Vanities and Components Thereof from the People's Republic of
China: Foremost Final Determination Calculation Memorandum,'' dated
concurrently with this notice; and Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components Thereof
from the People's Republic of China: Meisen Final Determination
Calculation Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with this notice
(collectively, Final Calculation Memoranda).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
As noted above, we calculated individual estimated subsidy rates
for Ancientree, Foremost and Meisen, and relied on AFA to assign
subsidy rates to AiDiJia and Deway, because they failed to respond to
Commerce's requests for information.
Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that, for companies not
individually investigated, Commerce will determine an all-others rate
equal to the weighted-average countervailable subsidy rates established
for exporters and/or producers individually investigated, excluding any
zero and de minimis countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates
determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. However, as we do not
have publicly-ranged sales data for all three of the participating
company respondents, we are using a simple average of the calculated
subsidy rates to establish the all-others rate.
Commerce determines the total estimated net countervailable subsidy
rates to be the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with
Ancientree: Jiangsu Hongjia Wood Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Hongjia Wood
Co., Ltd. Shanghai Branch, and Shanghai Hongjia Wood Co., Ltd.
\10\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
Commerce has found the following company to be cross-owned with
Dalian Meisen: Dalian Hechang Technology Development Co., Ltd.
\11\ As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum,
Commerce has found the following companies to be cross-owned with
Rizhao Foremost: Foremost Worldwide Co., Ltd., and Rizhao Foremost
Landbridge Wood Industries Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd \9\..................... 13.33
Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd \10\................. 18.27
[[Page 11964]]
Rizhao Foremost Woodwork Manufacturing Company Ltd \11\. 31.18
Deway International Trade Co., Ltd...................... 293.45
Henan AiDiJia Furniture Co., Ltd........................ 293.45
All Others.............................................. 20.93
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose to parties the calculations performed in this
proceeding within five days of any public announcement of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary Determination and pursuant to
sections 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, Commerce instructed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries
of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after August 12, 2019, the date of publication of the
Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register. In accordance with
section 703(d) of the Act, we issued instructions to CBP to discontinue
the suspension of liquidation for subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after December 9, 2019, but to continue
the suspension of liquidation of all entries from August 12, 2019
through December 8, 2019.
If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we intend to issue a countervailing
duty (CVD) order, reinstate the suspension of liquidation under section
706(a) of the Act, and require a cash deposit of estimated
countervailing duties for entries of subject merchandise in the amounts
indicated above. If the ITC determines that material injury, or threat
of material injury, does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated
and all estimated duties deposited or securities posted as a result of
the suspension of liquidation will be refunded or canceled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our determination. Because the final determination in this
proceeding is affirmative, in accordance with section 705(b) of the
Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the
domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or
threatened with material injury, by reason of imports of wooden
cabinets and vanities from China no later than 45 days after our final
determination. If the ITC determines that material injury or threat of
material injury does not exist, the proceeding will be terminated and
all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such
injury does exist, Commerce will issue a CVD order directing CBP to
assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, countervailing duties on
all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the
suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of
Suspension of Liquidation'' section.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)
In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury
determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties
subject to the APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction
of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).
Dated: February 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise subject to this investigation consists of wooden
cabinets and vanities that are for permanent installation (including
floor mounted, wall mounted, ceiling hung or by attachment of
plumbing), and wooden components thereof. Wooden cabinets and
vanities and wooden components are made substantially of wood
products, including solid wood and engineered wood products
(including those made from wood particles, fibers, or other wooden
materials such as plywood, strand board, block board, particle
board, or fiberboard), or bamboo. Wooden cabinets and vanities
consist of a cabinet box (which typically includes a top, bottom,
sides, back, base blockers, ends/end panels, stretcher rails, toe
kicks, and/or shelves) and may or may not include a frame, door,
drawers and/or shelves. Subject merchandise includes wooden cabinets
and vanities with or without wood veneers, wood, paper or other
overlays, or laminates, with or without non-wood components or trim
such as metal, marble, glass, plastic, or other resins, whether or
not surface finished or unfinished, and whether or not completed.
Wooden cabinets and vanities are covered by the investigation
whether or not they are imported attached to, or in conjunction
with, faucets, metal plumbing, sinks and/or sink bowls, or
countertops. If wooden cabinets or vanities are imported attached
to, or in conjunction with, such merchandise, only the wooden
cabinet or vanity is covered by the scope.
Subject merchandise includes the following wooden component
parts of cabinets and vanities: (1) Wooden cabinet and vanity frames
(2) wooden cabinet and vanity boxes (which typically include a top,
bottom, sides, back, base blockers, ends/end panels, stretcher
rails, toe kicks, and/or shelves), (3) wooden cabinet or vanity
doors, (4) wooden cabinet or vanity drawers and drawer components
(which typically include sides, backs, bottoms, and faces), (5) back
panels and end panels, (6) and desks, shelves, and tables that are
attached to or incorporated in the subject merchandise.
Subject merchandise includes all unassembled, assembled and/or
``ready to assemble'' (RTA) wooden cabinets and vanities, also
commonly known as ``flat packs,'' except to the extent such
merchandise is already covered by the scope of antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on Hardwood Plywood from the People's
Republic of China. See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January
4, 2018); Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 513 (January 4,
2018). RTA wooden cabinets and vanities are defined as cabinets or
vanities packaged so that at the time of importation they may
include: (1) Wooden components required to assemble a cabinet or
vanity (including drawer faces and doors); and (2) parts (e.g.,
screws, washers, dowels, nails, handles, knobs, adhesive glues)
required to assemble a cabinet or vanity. RTAs may enter the United
States in one or in multiple packages.
Subject merchandise also includes wooden cabinets and vanities
and in-scope components that have been further processed in a third
country, including but not limited to one or more of the following:
trimming, cutting, notching, punching, drilling, painting, staining,
finishing, assembly, or any other processing that would not
otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation
if performed in the country of manufacture of the in-scope product.
Excluded from the scope of this investigation, if entered
separate from a wooden cabinet or vanity are:
(1) Aftermarket accessory items which may be added to or
installed into an interior of a cabinet and which are not considered
a structural or core component of a wooden cabinet or vanity.
Aftermarket accessory
[[Page 11965]]
items may be made of wood, metal, plastic, composite material, or a
combination thereof that can be inserted into a cabinet and which
are utilized in the function of organization/accessibility on the
interior of a cabinet; and include:
Inserts or dividers which are placed into drawer boxes
with the purpose of organizing or dividing the internal portion of
the drawer into multiple areas for the purpose of containing smaller
items such as cutlery, utensils, bathroom essentials, etc.
Round or oblong inserts that rotate internally in a
cabinet for the purpose of accessibility to foodstuffs, dishware,
general supplies, etc.
(2) Solid wooden accessories including corbels and rosettes,
which serve the primary purpose of decoration and personalization.
(3) Non-wooden cabinet hardware components including metal
hinges, brackets, catches, locks, drawer slides, fasteners (nails,
screws, tacks, staples), handles, and knobs.
(4) Medicine cabinets that meet all of the following five
criteria are excluded from the scope: (1) Wall mounted; (2)
assembled at the time of entry into the United States; (3) contain
one or more mirrors; (4) be packaged for retail sale at time of
entry; and (5) have a maximum depth of seven inches.
Also excluded from the scope of this investigation are:
(1) All products covered by the scope of the antidumping duty
order on Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of
China. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture
from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005).
(2) All products covered by the scope of the antidumping and
countervailing duty orders on Hardwood Plywood from the People's
Republic of China. See Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order, 83 FR 504 (January
4, 2018); Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's
Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR. 513 (January 4,
2018).
Imports of subject merchandise are classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) statistical numbers
9403.40.9060 and 9403.60.8081. The subject component parts of wooden
cabinets and vanities may be entered into the United States under
HTSUS statistical number 9403.90.7080. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of this investigation is
dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Use of Adverse Facts Available
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Analysis of Programs
VIII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Initiation of the Investigation
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to the Provision of
Electricity for Less than Adequate Remuneration (LTAR) Program
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to Find the Export
Buyer's Credit (EBC) Program Countervailable
Comment 4: Whether the Policy Loans to the Wooden Cabinet and
Vanity Industry Program Is Countervailable
Comment 5: Whether Land Prices in Thailand Provide a Suitable
Benchmark for Land Prices in China
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to the Provision of
Inputs for LTAR
Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to Self-Reported
Subsidies
Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should Adjust Its Plywood Benchmark
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Apply AFA to Meisen
Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find that Meisen
Was Uncreditworthy
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Countervail Subsidies
Received by Foremost's Tolling Companies
Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should Continue to Find that
Foremost Was Uncreditworthy
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020-04120 Filed 2-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P