Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From People's Republic of China, Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan: Final Results of Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders, 11337-11338 [2020-03999]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2020 / Notices
Dated: February 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
complete notices of intent to participate
in these sunset reviews from AK Steel
Corporation (AK Steel) (domestic
interested party), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).3
[FR Doc. 2020–04002 Filed 2–26–20; 8:45 am]
The domestic interested party claimed
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
interested party status within the
meaning of section 771(9)(C) of the Act
as a manufacturer in the United States
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
of the domestic like product.4
On November 27, 2019, the domestic
International Trade Administration
interested party filed timely and
[A–570–996, A–428–843, A–588–872, A–580–
adequate substantive responses, within
872, A–401–809, A–583–851]
the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From
receive substantive responses from any
People’s Republic of China, Germany,
Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, and respondent interested party, with
respect to any of the orders covered by
Taiwan: Final Results of Expedited
First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping
3 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letters, ‘‘FiveDuty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset
reviews, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on nonoriented electrical steel (NOES) from
People’s Republic of China (China),
Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea
(Korea), Sweden, and Taiwan would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, at the levels
identified in the ‘‘Final Results of
Sunset Reviews’’ section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable February 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Abdul Alnoor, Eva Kim, Paola AlemanOrdaz, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4554,
(202) 482–8283, or (202) 482–4031,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Background
On December 3, 2014, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
notices of the antidumping duty orders
on NOES from China, Germany, Japan,
Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.1 On
November 1, 2019, Commerce published
the initiation of the first sunset reviews
of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).2 On November 15, 2019,
Commerce received timely and
1 See Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from the
People’s Republic of China, Germany, Japan, the
Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 71741 (December
3, 2014) (Orders).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84
FR 58687 (November 1, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Feb 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order
On Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From The
People’s Republic Of China: Domestic Interested
Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated
November 15, 2019 (AK Steel’s Intent to Participate
for China); ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Germany: Domestic Interested
Party Notice Of Intent To Participate,’’ dated
November 15, 2019 (AK Steel’s Intent to Participate
for Germany); ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Japan: Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated November 15, 2019 (AK Steel’s
Intent to Participate for Japan); ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’)
Review of Antidumping Duty Order On NonOriented Electrical Steel From The Republic of
Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated
November 1, 2019 (AK Steel’s Intent to Participate
for Korea); ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Sweden: Domestic Interested
Party Notice of Intent To Participate,’’ dated
November 15, 2019 (AK Steel’s Intent to Participate
for Sweden); and ‘‘Five-Year (‘Sunset’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Taiwan: Domestic Interested
Party Notice of Intent to Participate,’’ dated
November 15, 2019 (AK Steel’s Intent to Participate
for Taiwan).
4 See AK Steel’s Intent to Participate for China at
2; see also AK Steel’s Intent to Participate for
Germany; AK Steel’s Intent to Participate for Japan;
AK Steel’s Intent to Participate for Korea; AK Steel’s
Intent to Participate for Sweden; and AK Steel’s
Intent to Participate for Taiwan at 2.
5 See Domestic Interested Party’s Letters, ‘‘Five
Year (‘Sunset’) Review of Antidumping Duty Order
on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From the People’s
Republic of China: Domestic Interested Party
Substantive Response,’’ dated November 27, 2019;
‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty
Order On Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From
Germany: Domestic Interested Party Substantive
Response,’’ dated November 27, 2019; ‘‘Five-Year
(‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From The Republic of
Korea: Domestic Interested Party Substantive
Response,’’ dated November 27, 2019; ‘‘Five-Year
(‘Sunset’) Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From Japan: Domestic
Interested Party Substantive Response,’’ dated
November 27, 2019; ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) Review
Of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Sweden: Domestic Interested
Party Substantive Response,’’ dated November 27,
2019; and ‘‘Five Year (‘Sunset’) Review of
Antidumping Duty Order on Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Taiwan: Domestic Interested
Party Substantive Response,’’ dated November 27,
2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11337
these sunset reviews. As a result,
pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2),
Commerce conducted expedited (120day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these
orders is NOES from China, Germany,
Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. The
subject merchandise is provided for in
subheadings 7225.19.0000,
7226.19.1000, and 7226.19.9000 of the
HTSUS. Subject merchandise may also
be entered under subheadings
7225.50.8085, 7225.99.0090,
7226.92.5000, 7226.92.7050,
7226.92.8050, 7226.99.0180 of the
HTSUS. Although HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written
description of the scope is dispositive.
A full description of the scope of the
Orders is contained in the
accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.6
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues
raised in these sunset reviews,
including the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping in the event
of revocation of the Orders and the
magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the Orders were to be revoked,
is provided in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum, which is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of
the topics discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is attached as an
Appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on NonOriented Electrical Steel from People’s Republic of
China, Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden,
and Taiwan’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum),
dated concurrently with this notice.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
11338
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2020 / Notices
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Orders
on NOES from China, Germany, Japan,
Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins of up to 407.52 percent
for China, 98.84 percent for Germany,
204.79 percent for Japan, 6.88 percent
for Korea, 126.72 percent for Sweden,
and 52.23 percent for Taiwan.
International Trade Administration
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective, orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: February 20, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
A. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
B. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–03999 Filed 2–26–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Feb 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
[A–201–842]
Large Residential Washers From
Mexico: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that the producer/exporter subject to
this administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value (NV). Interested parties are invited
to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable February 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Janz or William Miller, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2972 or (202) 482–3906,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On May 2, 2019, based on a timely
request for review, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on large
residential washers from Mexico, for
one company, Electrolux Home
Products Corp. N.V. and Electrolux
Home Products de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(collectively, Electrolux).1 The period of
review (POR) is February 1, 2018
through January 31, 2019. In October
2019, we extended the preliminary
results of this review to no later than
February 28, 2020.2 For a complete
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the order are
all large residential washers and certain
1 See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
18777 (May 2, 2019).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Large Residential Washers
from Mexico: Extension of the Deadline for
Preliminary Results of the 2018–2019 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated October 21,
2019.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the 2018–2019
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Large Residential Washers from Mexico,’’
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
subassemblies thereof from Mexico.4
The products are currently classifiable
under subheadings 8450.20.0040 and
8450.20.0080 of the Harmonized Tariff
System of the United States (HTSUS).
Products subject to this order may also
enter under HTSUS subheadings
8450.11.0040, 8450.11.0080,
8450.90.2000, and 8450.90.6000.
Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
merchandise subject to this scope is
dispositive.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Constructed export price is calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
NV is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology
underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
summary/mexico/mexico-fr.htm. The
signed and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content. A list of the topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average margin of 3.53 percent
exists for Electrolux for the period
February 1, 2018 through January 31,
2019.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of this
administrative review, Commerce shall
determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries.5
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
4 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
5 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11337-11338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03999]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-996, A-428-843, A-588-872, A-580-872, A-401-809, A-583-851]
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From People's Republic of China,
Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan: Final Results of
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on non-oriented electrical steel (NOES) from People's Republic
of China (China), Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea (Korea), Sweden,
and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, at the levels identified in the ``Final Results of Sunset
Reviews'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable February 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abdul Alnoor, Eva Kim, Paola Aleman-
Ordaz, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4554, (202) 482-8283, or (202) 482-4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 3, 2014, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
notices of the antidumping duty orders on NOES from China, Germany,
Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan.\1\ On November 1, 2019, Commerce
published the initiation of the first sunset reviews of the Orders,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).\2\ On November 15, 2019, Commerce received timely and complete
notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from AK Steel
Corporation (AK Steel) (domestic interested party), within the deadline
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).\3\ The domestic interested party
claimed interested party status within the meaning of section 771(9)(C)
of the Act as a manufacturer in the United States of the domestic like
product.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from the People's Republic
of China, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 71741 (December 3, 2014) (Orders).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 58687
(November 1, 2019).
\3\ See Domestic Interested Party's Letters, ``Five-Year
(`Sunset') Review of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From The People's Republic Of China: Domestic
Interested Party Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated November
15, 2019 (AK Steel's Intent to Participate for China); ``Five Year
(`Sunset') Review of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Germany: Domestic Interested Party Notice Of
Intent To Participate,'' dated November 15, 2019 (AK Steel's Intent
to Participate for Germany); ``Five-Year (`Sunset') Review of
Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From Japan:
Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated November 15, 2019 (AK
Steel's Intent to Participate for Japan); ``Five-Year (`Sunset')
Review of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented Electrical Steel
From The Republic of Korea: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated
November 1, 2019 (AK Steel's Intent to Participate for Korea);
``Five-Year (`Sunset') Review of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-
Oriented Electrical Steel From Sweden: Domestic Interested Party
Notice of Intent To Participate,'' dated November 15, 2019 (AK
Steel's Intent to Participate for Sweden); and ``Five-Year
(`Sunset') Review of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Taiwan: Domestic Interested Party Notice of
Intent to Participate,'' dated November 15, 2019 (AK Steel's Intent
to Participate for Taiwan).
\4\ See AK Steel's Intent to Participate for China at 2; see
also AK Steel's Intent to Participate for Germany; AK Steel's Intent
to Participate for Japan; AK Steel's Intent to Participate for
Korea; AK Steel's Intent to Participate for Sweden; and AK Steel's
Intent to Participate for Taiwan at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 27, 2019, the domestic interested party filed timely
and adequate substantive responses, within the deadline specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ Commerce did not receive substantive responses
from any respondent interested party, with respect to any of the orders
covered by these sunset reviews. As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Domestic Interested Party's Letters, ``Five Year
(`Sunset') Review of Antidumping Duty Order on Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From the People's Republic of China: Domestic
Interested Party Substantive Response,'' dated November 27, 2019;
``Five Year (`Sunset') Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-
Oriented Electrical Steel From Germany: Domestic Interested Party
Substantive Response,'' dated November 27, 2019; ``Five-Year
(`Sunset') Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From The Republic of Korea: Domestic Interested
Party Substantive Response,'' dated November 27, 2019; ``Five-Year
(`Sunset') Review Of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented
Electrical Steel From Japan: Domestic Interested Party Substantive
Response,'' dated November 27, 2019; ``Five Year (`Sunset') Review
Of Antidumping Duty Order On Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From
Sweden: Domestic Interested Party Substantive Response,'' dated
November 27, 2019; and ``Five Year (`Sunset') Review of Antidumping
Duty Order on Non-Oriented Electrical Steel From Taiwan: Domestic
Interested Party Substantive Response,'' dated November 27, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these orders is NOES from China,
Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan. The subject merchandise is
provided for in subheadings 7225.19.0000, 7226.19.1000, and
7226.19.9000 of the HTSUS. Subject merchandise may also be entered
under subheadings 7225.50.8085, 7225.99.0090, 7226.92.5000,
7226.92.7050, 7226.92.8050, 7226.99.0180 of the HTSUS. Although HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope is dispositive. A full description of
the scope of the Orders is contained in the accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited First Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from People's Republic of China,
Germany, Japan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan'' (Issues and
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews,
including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in
the event of revocation of the Orders and the magnitude of the margins
likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked, is provided in the
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by
this notice. A list of the topics discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
[[Page 11338]]
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
Commerce determines that revocation of the Orders on NOES from China,
Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the
dumping margins likely to prevail would be weighted-average margins of
up to 407.52 percent for China, 98.84 percent for Germany, 204.79
percent for Japan, 6.88 percent for Korea, 126.72 percent for Sweden,
and 52.23 percent for Taiwan.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective, orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and
19 CFR 351.218 and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: February 20, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
A. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
B. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020-03999 Filed 2-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P