Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Assume Operational Responsibility for Certain Enforcement Functions Currently Performed by FINRA Under the Exchanges Authority and Supervision, 9870-9872 [2020-03322]
Download as PDF
9870
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2020 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88209; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2020–007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Assume Operational Responsibility for
Certain Enforcement Functions
Currently Performed by FINRA Under
the Exchanges Authority and
Supervision
February 13, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
3, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to assume
operational responsibility for certain
enforcement functions currently
performed by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) under
the Exchange’s authority and
supervision. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to assume operational
responsibility for litigating contested
disciplinary proceedings arising out of
Nasdaq Regulation-led investigation and
enforcement activities. In carrying out
that responsibility, the Exchange plans
to engage a third party, such as a law
firm or another self-regulatory
organization. Nasdaq Rule General 1,
Section 7 3 requires Commission
approval for this proposal.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Formally Nasdaq Rule 0150.
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:48 Feb 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Section 6 of the Act requires that
national securities exchanges enforce
their members’ compliance with federal
securities laws and rules as well as the
exchanges’ own rules.4 As a selfregulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’),
Nasdaq must have a comprehensive
regulatory program that includes
investigation and prosecution of
violative activity. Since it became a
national securities exchange, Nasdaq
has contracted with FINRA through
various regulatory services agreements
(‘‘RSAs’’) to perform certain of these
regulatory functions on its behalf.
However, as the Commission has made
clear, ‘‘the Nasdaq Exchange bears the
responsibility for self-regulatory
conduct and primary liability for selfregulatory failures, not the SRO retained
to perform regulatory functions on the
Exchange’s behalf.’’ 5
In April 2019, Nasdaq received
Commission approval to reallocate
operational responsibility from FINRA
to Nasdaq Regulation 6 for certain
investigation and enforcement activity,7
namely:
• Investigation and enforcement
responsibilities for conduct occurring
on The Nasdaq Options Market,8 and
• investigation and enforcement
responsibilities for conduct occurring
on Nasdaq’s equity market only, i.e., not
also on non-Nasdaq-affiliated equities
markets.9
4 15
U.S.C. 78(f).
Exchange Act Release No. 53128
(January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550, 3556 (January 23,
2006).
6 Under Nasdaq Rule 9120(t), Nasdaq Regulation
includes the Nasdaq Enforcement Department.
7 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85505
(April 3, 2019), 84 FR 14170, 14171 (April 9, 2016).
8 As appropriate, Nasdaq Regulation coordinates
with other SROs to the extent it is investigating
activity occurring on non-Nasdaq options markets
to ensure no regulatory duplication occurs.
9 With respect to the operational responsibilities
described, Nasdaq Regulation already performed
these functions for the Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’),
Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’), Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(‘‘GEMX’’), and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (‘‘MRX’’)
because there is no comparable rule to Rule General
1, Section 7 on those markets. Nasdaq BX, Inc.
5 Securities
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notwithstanding that approval,
FINRA continues to perform certain
functions pursuant to a RSA,10
including, among other things, the
handling of contested disciplinary
proceedings arising out of Nasdaq
Regulation-led investigation and
enforcement activities.11 Nasdaq now
requests Commission approval to
reallocate operational responsibility
from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation for
certain enforcement activity, namely the
handling of contested disciplinary
proceedings through the use a third
party, not just FINRA.12
In its prior request for Commission
approval to reallocate operational
responsibility from FINRA to Nasdaq
Regulation for certain investigation and
enforcement functions, the Exchange
noted that its expertise in its own
market structure coupled with its
expertise in surveillance activities will
enable it to conduct investigation and
enforcement responsibilities for the
Exchange effectively, efficiently and
with immediacy.13 The Exchange
believes that assuming responsibility for
litigating contested disciplinary
proceedings through the use of more
than one third party will similarly
ensure that matters are handled
effectively, efficiently and with
immediacy. As it does with FINRA, the
Exchange would directly oversee the
work performed by the third party. This
will ensure that the Exchange continues
to bring to bear its overall market and
surveillance expertise throughout the
disciplinary proceedings. Moreover, the
Exchange will only use third parties that
(‘‘BX’’), which does have a comparable rule to Rule
General 1, Section 7, received Commission approval
to perform these functions in June 2019. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86051 (June 6,
2019), 84 FR 27387 (June 22, 2019).
10 In addition to work performed pursuant to a
RSA, FINRA also performs work for matters covered
by agreements to allocate regulatory responsibility
under Rule 17d–2 of the Act.
11 For example, pursuant to Rule 9216, if at the
conclusion of a Nasdaq Regulation-led
investigation, Nasdaq Regulation has reason to
believe that a violation occurred but the
Respondent disputes the violation and therefore
does not execute an Acceptance, Waiver, and
Consent (‘‘AWC’’) letter, or if the Respondent
executes the AWC letter but the Nasdaq Review
Council, Review Subcommittee or FINRA’s Office
of Disciplinary Affairs does not accept the executed
letter, the Exchange may decide to pursue formal
disciplinary proceedings. In such a case, the
Exchange would refer the matter to FINRA to
handle the formal disciplinary proceedings on its
behalf. FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers
continues to be responsible for the administration
of the hearing process.
12 A third party may include a law firm or another
self-regulatory organization. The Exchange will
continue to use FINRA’s Office of Hearing Officers
to administer the hearing process.
13 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85153
(February 15, 2019), 84 FR 5748, 5752 (February 22,
2019).
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
have the requisite legal experience,
ensuring that only those third parties
with the appropriate qualifications
handle contested matters on the
Exchange’s behalf. Having the option to
use a third party other than FINRA will
also ensure that contested cases are
handled promptly when, for example,
FINRA’s litigation resources are strained
or when it is otherwise unable to handle
a particular matter.14 The Exchange
notes that this proposal would not
change or alter in any way the
disciplinary processes around how
contested matters are handled.
Nasdaq Rule General 1, Section 7
requires that Nasdaq obtain Commission
approval if regulatory functions subject
to RSAs in effect at the time that Nasdaq
began to operate as a national securities
exchange are no longer performed by
FINRA or an affiliate thereof, or by
another independent self-regulatory
organization. Nasdaq believes that
assuming operational responsibility for
contested disciplinary proceedings by
using more than one third party to
litigate such matters will further its
regulatory program and benefit investors
and the markets. Commission approval
of the proposal would allow Nasdaq to
deliver increased efficiencies in the
regulation of its market and to act
promptly and provide more effective
regulation.15
Finally, Nasdaq notes that its proposal
is consistent with work performed by
other national securities exchanges. For
example, in 2015, the SEC approved the
New York Stock Exchange’s (‘‘NYSE’’)
application whereby NYSE amended
certain of its disciplinary rules to
facilitate the reintegration of certain
market surveillance, investigation and
enforcement functions performed on
behalf of NYSE by FINRA.16 That
reintegration also included the handling
of contested disciplinary proceedings.
14 The Exchange intends to continue to use
FINRA to handle contested disciplinary
proceedings. The Exchange is requesting
permission to have the option to use a third party
other than FINRA when it believes that doing so is
consistent with ensuring prompt resolution of
regulatory matters.
15 BX, which has a comparable rule to Rule
General 1, Section 7, will file a similar rule filing
to request Commission approval to use a third party
to handle contested disciplinary proceedings.
16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75721
(August 18, 2015), 80 FR 51334 (August 24, 2015)
and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
Nos. 1, 3 and 5, Amending Exchange Disciplinary
Rules to Facilitate the Reintegration of Certain
Regulatory Functions from Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc., Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 76436 (November 13, 2015), 80 FR
72460 (November 19, 2015) (SR–NYSE–2015–35).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:48 Feb 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,17 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,18
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest. In
addition, the Exchange believes that the
proposal furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(7) of the Act,19 in
particular, in that these changes will
continue to provide for fair procedures
for the disciplining of members and
persons associated with members, the
denial of membership to any person
seeking membership therein, the barring
of any person from becoming associated
with a member thereof, and the
prohibition or limitation by the
Exchange of any person with respect to
access to services offered by the
Exchange or a member thereof.
The Exchange believes that this
proposal is in keeping with those
principles because it will ensure that
contested matters are handled
effectively, efficiently and with
immediacy. The ability to assume
responsibility for this function by using
more than one party to handle contested
matters will ensure that contested cases
are handled promptly when, for
example, FINRA’s litigation resources
are strained or when it is otherwise
unable to handle a particular matter.
This will enable the Exchange to take
timely action when appropriate to
enforce its rules, hold bad actors
accountable, and protect investors and
market integrity. This proposal,
however, would not change or alter in
any way the disciplinary processes
around how contested matters are
handled. Rather, it will result in more
effective regulation because it will
facilitate timely and more efficient
action. Internalizing the litigation
function through the use of a third party
other than FINRA will also enhance
regulation because the Exchange will
continue to bring to bear its overall
market and surveillance expertise
throughout the disciplinary
proceedings. Moreover, the Exchange,
consistent with its statutory obligations,
will only use third parties that have the
requisite legal experience, ensuring that
only those third parties with the
appropriate qualifications handle
17 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
19 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
18 15
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9871
contested matters on the Exchange’s
behalf.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather to
enable the Exchange to have the option
to use a third party other than FINRA
to litigate contested matters on the
Exchange’s behalf.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the Exchange consents,
the Commission shall: (a) By order
approve or disapprove such proposed
rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2020–007 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2020–007. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
9872
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 34 / Thursday, February 20, 2020 / Notices
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2020–007 and
should be submitted on or before March
12, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–03322 Filed 2–19–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–88219; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2020–008]
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
February 14, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
4, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:48 Feb 19, 2020
Jkt 250001
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’
or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule
change to introduce a Small Retail
Broker Distribution Program. The text of
the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Introduce a
Small Retail Broker Distribution
Program
1 15
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
20 17
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to introduce a pricing program
that would allow small retail brokers
that purchase top of book market data
from the Exchange to benefit from
discounted fees for access to such
market data. The Small Retail Broker
Distribution Program (the ‘‘Program’’)
would reduce the distribution and
consolidation fees paid by small brokerdealers that operate a retail business. In
turn, the Program may increase retail
investor access to real-time U.S. equity
quote and trade information, and allow
the Exchange to better compete for this
business with competitors that offer
similar optional products.
The Exchange initially filed to
introduce the Program on August 1,
2019 (‘‘Initial Proposal’’) to further
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ensure that retail investors served by
smaller firms have cost effective access
to its market data products, and as part
of its ongoing efforts to improve the
retail investor experience in the public
markets. The Initial Proposal was
published in the Federal Register on
August 20, 2019,3 and the Commission
received no comment letters on the
Initial Proposal. The Program remained
in effect until the fee change was
temporarily suspended pursuant to a
suspension order (the ‘‘Initial
Suspension Order’’).4 The Initial
Suspension Order also instituted
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the Initial
Proposal.5 On October 1, 2019, the
Exchange re-filed its proposed rule
change with additional information
about the basis for the proposed fee
change (‘‘Second Proposal’’). The
Second Proposal was published in the
Federal Register on October 15, 2019,6
and the Commission received no
comment letters on the Second
Proposal. The Program again remained
in effect until the fee change was
temporarily suspended pursuant to a
suspension order (the ‘‘Second
Suspension Order’’).7 The Second
Suspension Order also instituted
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the Second
Proposal.8 On November 27, 2019, the
Exchange re-filed its proposed rule
change a third time with one revision to
the requirements for participating in the
Program and additional information
about the basis for the proposed fee
change (‘‘Third Proposal’’). The Third
Proposal was published in the Federal
Register on December 16, 2019.9 Today,
the Exchange is withdrawing the Third
Proposal, and replacing it with this
proposed fee change as part of its
ongoing efforts to continue to facilitate
retail investor access to reasonably
priced market data.
Current Fees
Today, the Exchange offers two top of
book data feeds that provide real-time
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86678
(August 14, 2019), 84 FR 43246 (August 20, 2019)
(SR–CboeEDGX–2019–048).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87172
(September 30, 2019), 84 FR 53192 (October 4,
2019) (SR–CboeEDGX–2019–048).
5 Id.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87295
(October 11, 2019), 84 FR 55624 (October 17, 2019)
(SR–boeEDGX–2019–059).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87635
(November 26, 2019), 84 FR 66242 (December 3,
2019) (SR–CboeEDGX–2019–059).
8 Id.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87711
(December 10, 2019), 84 FR 68501 (December 16,
2019) (SR–CboeEDGX–2019–071).
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9870-9872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03322]
[[Page 9870]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88209; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Assume Operational
Responsibility for Certain Enforcement Functions Currently Performed by
FINRA Under the Exchanges Authority and Supervision
February 13, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 3, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to assume operational responsibility for
certain enforcement functions currently performed by the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') under the Exchange's
authority and supervision. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
assume operational responsibility for litigating contested disciplinary
proceedings arising out of Nasdaq Regulation-led investigation and
enforcement activities. In carrying out that responsibility, the
Exchange plans to engage a third party, such as a law firm or another
self-regulatory organization. Nasdaq Rule General 1, Section 7 \3\
requires Commission approval for this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Formally Nasdaq Rule 0150.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Section 6 of the Act requires that national securities exchanges
enforce their members' compliance with federal securities laws and
rules as well as the exchanges' own rules.\4\ As a self-regulatory
organization (``SRO''), Nasdaq must have a comprehensive regulatory
program that includes investigation and prosecution of violative
activity. Since it became a national securities exchange, Nasdaq has
contracted with FINRA through various regulatory services agreements
(``RSAs'') to perform certain of these regulatory functions on its
behalf. However, as the Commission has made clear, ``the Nasdaq
Exchange bears the responsibility for self-regulatory conduct and
primary liability for self-regulatory failures, not the SRO retained to
perform regulatory functions on the Exchange's behalf.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f).
\5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (January 13,
2006), 71 FR 3550, 3556 (January 23, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In April 2019, Nasdaq received Commission approval to reallocate
operational responsibility from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation \6\ for
certain investigation and enforcement activity,\7\ namely:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Under Nasdaq Rule 9120(t), Nasdaq Regulation includes the
Nasdaq Enforcement Department.
\7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85505 (April 3, 2019),
84 FR 14170, 14171 (April 9, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investigation and enforcement responsibilities for conduct
occurring on The Nasdaq Options Market,\8\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As appropriate, Nasdaq Regulation coordinates with other
SROs to the extent it is investigating activity occurring on non-
Nasdaq options markets to ensure no regulatory duplication occurs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
investigation and enforcement responsibilities for conduct
occurring on Nasdaq's equity market only, i.e., not also on non-Nasdaq-
affiliated equities markets.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ With respect to the operational responsibilities described,
Nasdaq Regulation already performed these functions for the Nasdaq
PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE''), Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(``GEMX''), and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') because there is no
comparable rule to Rule General 1, Section 7 on those markets.
Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX''), which does have a comparable rule to Rule
General 1, Section 7, received Commission approval to perform these
functions in June 2019. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
86051 (June 6, 2019), 84 FR 27387 (June 22, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notwithstanding that approval, FINRA continues to perform certain
functions pursuant to a RSA,\10\ including, among other things, the
handling of contested disciplinary proceedings arising out of Nasdaq
Regulation-led investigation and enforcement activities.\11\ Nasdaq now
requests Commission approval to reallocate operational responsibility
from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation for certain enforcement activity,
namely the handling of contested disciplinary proceedings through the
use a third party, not just FINRA.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In addition to work performed pursuant to a RSA, FINRA also
performs work for matters covered by agreements to allocate
regulatory responsibility under Rule 17d-2 of the Act.
\11\ For example, pursuant to Rule 9216, if at the conclusion of
a Nasdaq Regulation-led investigation, Nasdaq Regulation has reason
to believe that a violation occurred but the Respondent disputes the
violation and therefore does not execute an Acceptance, Waiver, and
Consent (``AWC'') letter, or if the Respondent executes the AWC
letter but the Nasdaq Review Council, Review Subcommittee or FINRA's
Office of Disciplinary Affairs does not accept the executed letter,
the Exchange may decide to pursue formal disciplinary proceedings.
In such a case, the Exchange would refer the matter to FINRA to
handle the formal disciplinary proceedings on its behalf. FINRA's
Office of Hearing Officers continues to be responsible for the
administration of the hearing process.
\12\ A third party may include a law firm or another self-
regulatory organization. The Exchange will continue to use FINRA's
Office of Hearing Officers to administer the hearing process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its prior request for Commission approval to reallocate
operational responsibility from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation for certain
investigation and enforcement functions, the Exchange noted that its
expertise in its own market structure coupled with its expertise in
surveillance activities will enable it to conduct investigation and
enforcement responsibilities for the Exchange effectively, efficiently
and with immediacy.\13\ The Exchange believes that assuming
responsibility for litigating contested disciplinary proceedings
through the use of more than one third party will similarly ensure that
matters are handled effectively, efficiently and with immediacy. As it
does with FINRA, the Exchange would directly oversee the work performed
by the third party. This will ensure that the Exchange continues to
bring to bear its overall market and surveillance expertise throughout
the disciplinary proceedings. Moreover, the Exchange will only use
third parties that
[[Page 9871]]
have the requisite legal experience, ensuring that only those third
parties with the appropriate qualifications handle contested matters on
the Exchange's behalf. Having the option to use a third party other
than FINRA will also ensure that contested cases are handled promptly
when, for example, FINRA's litigation resources are strained or when it
is otherwise unable to handle a particular matter.\14\ The Exchange
notes that this proposal would not change or alter in any way the
disciplinary processes around how contested matters are handled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85153 (February 15,
2019), 84 FR 5748, 5752 (February 22, 2019).
\14\ The Exchange intends to continue to use FINRA to handle
contested disciplinary proceedings. The Exchange is requesting
permission to have the option to use a third party other than FINRA
when it believes that doing so is consistent with ensuring prompt
resolution of regulatory matters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nasdaq Rule General 1, Section 7 requires that Nasdaq obtain
Commission approval if regulatory functions subject to RSAs in effect
at the time that Nasdaq began to operate as a national securities
exchange are no longer performed by FINRA or an affiliate thereof, or
by another independent self-regulatory organization. Nasdaq believes
that assuming operational responsibility for contested disciplinary
proceedings by using more than one third party to litigate such matters
will further its regulatory program and benefit investors and the
markets. Commission approval of the proposal would allow Nasdaq to
deliver increased efficiencies in the regulation of its market and to
act promptly and provide more effective regulation.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ BX, which has a comparable rule to Rule General 1, Section
7, will file a similar rule filing to request Commission approval to
use a third party to handle contested disciplinary proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, Nasdaq notes that its proposal is consistent with work
performed by other national securities exchanges. For example, in 2015,
the SEC approved the New York Stock Exchange's (``NYSE'') application
whereby NYSE amended certain of its disciplinary rules to facilitate
the reintegration of certain market surveillance, investigation and
enforcement functions performed on behalf of NYSE by FINRA.\16\ That
reintegration also included the handling of contested disciplinary
proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75721 (August 18,
2015), 80 FR 51334 (August 24, 2015) and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1,
3 and 5, Amending Exchange Disciplinary Rules to Facilitate the
Reintegration of Certain Regulatory Functions from Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 76436 (November 13, 2015), 80 FR 72460 (November 19, 2015) (SR-
NYSE-2015-35).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposal furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(7) of the Act,\19\ in particular, in
that these changes will continue to provide for fair procedures for the
disciplining of members and persons associated with members, the denial
of membership to any person seeking membership therein, the barring of
any person from becoming associated with a member thereof, and the
prohibition or limitation by the Exchange of any person with respect to
access to services offered by the Exchange or a member thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that this proposal is in keeping with those
principles because it will ensure that contested matters are handled
effectively, efficiently and with immediacy. The ability to assume
responsibility for this function by using more than one party to handle
contested matters will ensure that contested cases are handled promptly
when, for example, FINRA's litigation resources are strained or when it
is otherwise unable to handle a particular matter. This will enable the
Exchange to take timely action when appropriate to enforce its rules,
hold bad actors accountable, and protect investors and market
integrity. This proposal, however, would not change or alter in any way
the disciplinary processes around how contested matters are handled.
Rather, it will result in more effective regulation because it will
facilitate timely and more efficient action. Internalizing the
litigation function through the use of a third party other than FINRA
will also enhance regulation because the Exchange will continue to
bring to bear its overall market and surveillance expertise throughout
the disciplinary proceedings. Moreover, the Exchange, consistent with
its statutory obligations, will only use third parties that have the
requisite legal experience, ensuring that only those third parties with
the appropriate qualifications handle contested matters on the
Exchange's behalf.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not
intended to address competitive issues but rather to enable the
Exchange to have the option to use a third party other than FINRA to
litigate contested matters on the Exchange's behalf.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use
[[Page 9872]]
only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007 and should be submitted
on or before March 12, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-03322 Filed 2-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P