Certain Glass Containers From the People's Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 9458-9459 [2020-03227]
Download as PDF
9458
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2020 / Notices
AFA in the First Remand Results was
neither supported by substantial
evidence, nor in accordance with law.9
Specifically, the CIT held that ‘‘neither
the law nor the facts support the
Department’s findings that: (1) None of
Oriental Cherry’s factors of production
or its U.S. sales information was usable;
(2) Oriental Cherry failed to comply
with Commerce’s requests for
production and sales information to the
best of its ability; and (3) a rate of 118.04
percent was legally and factually
justified.’’ 10 As such, the CIT ordered
that: (1) Commerce calculate a rate for
Oriental Cherry using the factors of
production and U.S. sales information
submitted by Oriental Cherry in the
underlying review; 11 and (2) with
respect to shooting nails supplied by
Oriental Cherry’s affiliate, Jining
Dragon, Commerce use facts available in
filling in missing necessary information,
and (3) Commerce may draw an adverse
inference with respect to information
regarding the sales of shooting nails
during the period of review.12 On
September 5, 2019, Commerce issued its
Second Remand Results.13
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,14 as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,15 the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(CAFC) held that, pursuant to section
516A of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce must
publish a notice of a court decision that
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
October 18, 2019, judgment sustaining
the Second Remand Results constitutes
a final decision of the Court that is not
in harmony with Commerce’s Final
Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, Commerce is amending the
Final Results with respect to Oriental
Cherry. The revised weighted-average
17:51 Feb 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter
The Shandong Oriental Cherry
Entity .......................................
61.05
The CIT’s ruling was not appealed
and thus represents a final and
conclusive court decision. Commerce
will therefore instruct U.S. Customs and
Border Protection to assess antidumping
duties on unliquidated entries of subject
merchandise exported by Oriental
Cherry using the appropriate assessment
rates.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The cash deposit rate for Oriental
Cherry has been superseded by cash
deposit rates calculated in intervening
administrative reviews of the
antidumping duty order on certain steel
nails from China. Thus, we will not alter
its cash deposit rate.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e),
751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 11, 2020.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–03215 Filed 2–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–114]
Certain Glass Containers From the
People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination in the Less-Than-FairValue Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
9 See National Nail Corp. et al. v. United States,
Slip Op. 19–71 (June 12, 2019), CIT Court No. 16–
00052 (Second Remand Order) at 32–42 and 47.
10 Id. at 6 and 47.
11 Id. at 47–48.
12 Id. at 48.
13 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Remand Order in National Nail Corp. v. United
States, Consol. Ct. No. 16–00052 (September 5,
2019) (Second Remand Results).
14 See Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
15 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
dumping margin for Oriental Cherry for
the period August 1, 2013 through July
31, 2014 is as follows:
Applicable February 19, 2020.
Lilit
Astvatsatrian or Aleksandras Nakutis,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6412 or
(202) 482–3147, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
On October 15, 2019, the Department
of Commerce (Commerce) initiated a
less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation
of imports of certain glass containers
(glass containers) from the People’s
Republic of China.1 Currently, the
preliminary determination is due no
later than March 3, 2020.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
Commerce to issue the preliminary
determination in an LTFV investigation
within 140 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation.
However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act
permits Commerce to postpone the
preliminary determination until no later
than 190 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation if:
(A) The petitioner makes a timely
request for a postponement; or (B)
Commerce concludes that the parties
concerned are cooperating, that the
investigation is extraordinarily
complicated, and that additional time is
necessary to make a preliminary
determination. Under 19 CFR
351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a
request to postpone 25 days or more
before the scheduled date of the
preliminary determination and must
state the reasons for postponement.
Commerce will grant the request unless
it finds compelling reasons to deny the
request.
On February 3, 2020, the petitioner 2
submitted a timely request that
Commerce postpone the preliminary
determination in this LTFV
investigation.3 The petitioner stated that
it requests postponement ‘‘to allow all
parties ample time to fully analyze the
enormous volume of critical information
relevant prior to the preliminary
determination in this case.’’ 4
For the reasons stated above and
because there are no compelling reasons
to deny the request, Commerce, in
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of
the Act, is postponing the deadline for
the preliminary determination by 50
days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
which this investigation was initiated).
As a result, Commerce will issue its
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Certain Glass Containers from the People’s
Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-FairValue Investigation, 84 FR 56174 (October 21,
2019).
2 The petitioner is the American Glass Packaging
Coalition.
3 See Petitioner’s Letter ‘‘Certain Glass Containers
from the People’s Republic of China: Request to
Postpone Preliminary Determination,’’ dated
February 3, 2020.
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 2020 / Notices
preliminary determination no later than
April 22, 2020. In accordance with
section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final
determination in this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of
the preliminary determination, unless
postponed.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: February 12, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–03227 Filed 2–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts
Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results and Partial Rescission of
Review; 2017–2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that it is
appropriate to rescind this
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on tapered
roller bearings and parts thereof,
finished and unfinished (TRBs), from
the People’s Republic of China (China)
with respect to three of the four
companies involved in this review
because they had no bona fide (i.e.,
reviewable) sales to the United States
during the period of review (POR), June
1, 2017 through May 31, 2018. Further,
Commerce finds that the fourth
respondent is not eligible for a separate
rate.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable February 19, 2020.
Alex
Wood or Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–1959 or (202) 482–6274,
respectively.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Feb 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results on August 15, 2019.1
Subsequent to the Preliminary Results,
we received a case brief from Shandong
Aokai Bearing Co., Ltd. (Aokai), a
mandatory respondent in this review.
On December 10, 2019, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
Commerce extended the deadline for
issuing the final results until February
11, 2020.2
Scope of the Order
Imports covered by the order are
shipments of tapered roller bearings and
parts thereof, finished and unfinished,
from China; flange, take up cartridge,
and hanger units incorporating tapered
roller bearings; and tapered roller
housings (except pillow blocks)
incorporating tapered rollers, with or
without spindles, whether or not for
automotive use. These products are
currently classifiable under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) item numbers 8482.20.00,
8482.91.00.50, 8482.99.15, 8482.99.45,
8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.30.80,
8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 8483.90.80,
8708.70.6060, 8708.99.2300,
8708.99.4850, 8708.99.6890,
8708.99.8115, and 8708.99.8180.
Although the HTSUS item numbers are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
In the Issues and Decision
Memorandum,3 we address the issues
raised in Aokai’s case brief. The
Appendix to this notice includes a list
of the issues Aokai raised. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and ACCESS is
1 See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof,
Finished and Unfinished, from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Intent
to Rescind the Review in Part; 2017–2018, 84 FR
41701 (August 15, 2019) (Preliminary Results) and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tapered Roller Bearings
and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from
the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative,’’ dated December 10, 2019.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Tapered Roller Bearings
and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished, from
the People’s Republic of China; 2017–2018,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9459
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed Issues and
Decision Memorandum and the
electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Partial Rescission of the Review
We received no comments from
Hangzhou Xiaoshan Dingli Machinery
Co., Ltd. (Dingli) or Zhejiang Jingli
Bearing Technology Co. Ltd. (Jingli).
Further, with respect to Aokai, as
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, we continue to find that
it did not have a bona fide sale to serve
as the basis for our review. Thus,
consistent with our preliminary
determination, we find that Aokai,
Dingli, and Jingli did not have bona fide
sales during the POR and we are
rescinding this administrative review
with respect to all three companies.
Final Results of Review
We also received no comments
pertaining to Taizhou Zson Bearing
Technology Co., Ltd. (Zson), and
therefore we continue to find Zson to be
ineligible for a separate rate and, thus,
Zson is part of the China-wide entity.
The rate previously established for the
China-wide entity is 92.84 percent and
is not subject to change as a result of
this review, as no party requested a
review of the China-wide entity.
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
Commerce has determined, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review.
Because Commerce determined that
Zson did not qualify for a separate rate,
we will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on Zson’s entries of
subject merchandise at the rate of 92.84
percent, the current rate established for
the China-wide entity. Because
Commerce is rescinding this
administrative for Aokai, Dingli, and
Jingli, we will instruct CBP to assess
their entries at the rate entered.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9458-9459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03227]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-114]
Certain Glass Containers From the People's Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable February 19, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lilit Astvatsatrian or Aleksandras
Nakutis, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6412
or (202) 482-3147, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 15, 2019, the Department of Commerce (Commerce)
initiated a less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of imports of
certain glass containers (glass containers) from the People's Republic
of China.\1\ Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later
than March 3, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Glass Containers from the People's Republic of
China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation, 84 FR 56174
(October 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postponement of Preliminary Determination
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires Commerce to issue the preliminary determination in an
LTFV investigation within 140 days after the date on which Commerce
initiated the investigation. However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act
permits Commerce to postpone the preliminary determination until no
later than 190 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the
investigation if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely request for a
postponement; or (B) Commerce concludes that the parties concerned are
cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and
that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination.
Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request to
postpone 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary
determination and must state the reasons for postponement. Commerce
will grant the request unless it finds compelling reasons to deny the
request.
On February 3, 2020, the petitioner \2\ submitted a timely request
that Commerce postpone the preliminary determination in this LTFV
investigation.\3\ The petitioner stated that it requests postponement
``to allow all parties ample time to fully analyze the enormous volume
of critical information relevant prior to the preliminary determination
in this case.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The petitioner is the American Glass Packaging Coalition.
\3\ See Petitioner's Letter ``Certain Glass Containers from the
People's Republic of China: Request to Postpone Preliminary
Determination,'' dated February 3, 2020.
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons stated above and because there are no compelling
reasons to deny the request, Commerce, in accordance with section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing the deadline for the preliminary
determination by 50 days (i.e., 190 days after the date on which this
investigation was initiated). As a result, Commerce will issue its
[[Page 9459]]
preliminary determination no later than April 22, 2020. In accordance
with section 735(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the
deadline for the final determination in this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination,
unless postponed.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: February 12, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-03227 Filed 2-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P