Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan; Notice of Commission Determinations To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews, 8325 [2020-02854]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 2020 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–506 and 508 and 731–TA–1238–1243 (Review)] Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan; Notice of Commission Determinations To Conduct Full Five-Year Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether revocation of countervailing duty orders on nonoriented electrical steel (‘‘NOES’’) from China and Taiwan and the antidumping duty orders on NOES from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. DATES: February 4, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abu B. Kanu (202–205–2597), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 4, 2020, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (84 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:34 Feb 12, 2020 Jkt 250001 FR 58743, November 1, 2019) was adequate. The Commission also found that the respondent interested party group response to its notice of institution concerning the antidumping duty order on imports from Germany was adequate and, therefore, determined to proceed with a full review of that order. The Commission determined that the respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution concerning the countervailing duty orders on imports from China and Taiwan, and the antidumping duty orders on imports from China, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan were inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct full reviews of those orders in order to promote administrative efficiency considering its determination to conduct a full review of the antidumping duty order on imports from Germany. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 7, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–02854 Filed 2–12–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1121–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection; eComments Requested; New Collection: Criminal Cases in State Courts (CCSC), Previously Posted as Analysis of Publicly Available Court Data (APACD) Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-Day notice. AGENCY: Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed information collection was previously published, allowing for a 60 day comment period. Seven comments from SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 8325 the public were received during this period and are thoroughly addressed in the supporting statement for this collection. Three comments requested that information on interpreters be added. The requesters sought data elements reflecting for whom the interpreter was ordered (defendant, witness, victim), whether the interpreter was present for all hearings, and the qualifications of the interpreter. BJS added data elements asking courts to provide whether an interpreter was ordered for the case and for which party(ies) to the case the interpreter was ordered. BJS does not expect these changes to impact the estimated respondent burden. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 day until March 16, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Suzanne M. Strong, Statistician, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh Street NW, Washington, DC 20531 (email: Suzanne.M.Strong@usdoj.gov; telephone: 202–616–3666). Written comments and/or suggestions can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_ submissions@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: — Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; — Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; — Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and — Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM 13FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 8325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02854]



[[Page 8325]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-506 and 508 and 731-TA-1238-1243 (Review)]


Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, 
Sweden, and Taiwan; Notice of Commission Determinations To Conduct Full 
Five-Year Reviews

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with 
full reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 to determine whether 
revocation of countervailing duty orders on non-oriented electrical 
steel (``NOES'') from China and Taiwan and the antidumping duty orders 
on NOES from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and Taiwan would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within 
a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be 
established and announced at a later date.

DATES: February 4, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Abu B. Kanu (202-205-2597), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
    For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and 
rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 4, 2020, the Commission 
determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-
year reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)). The Commission found that the domestic interested 
party group response to its notice of institution (84 FR 58743, 
November 1, 2019) was adequate. The Commission also found that the 
respondent interested party group response to its notice of institution 
concerning the antidumping duty order on imports from Germany was 
adequate and, therefore, determined to proceed with a full review of 
that order. The Commission determined that the respondent interested 
party group responses to its notice of institution concerning the 
countervailing duty orders on imports from China and Taiwan, and the 
antidumping duty orders on imports from China, Japan, Korea, Sweden, 
and Taiwan were inadequate. However, the Commission determined to 
conduct full reviews of those orders in order to promote administrative 
efficiency considering its determination to conduct a full review of 
the antidumping duty order on imports from Germany. A record of the 
Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on adequacy, and any 
individual Commissioner's statements will be available from the Office 
of the Secretary and at the Commission's website.

    Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 7, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-02854 Filed 2-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P