Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories; Proposed Policy for Transitioning to Satellite Notification and Acceptance Program (SNAP) Termination, 7606-7610 [2020-02564]
Download as PDF
7606
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Notices
Membership in this group research
project remains open and IMS Global
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR
55283).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on November 5, 2019. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on November 18, 2019 (84 FR
63678).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics Unit,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2020–02544 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
Sunshine Act Meeting
2:00 p.m. Wednesday,
February 19, 2020.
PLACE: U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K
Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Approval of
April, May, June, July, August,
September, October, November and
December 2019 minutes; Reports from
the Vice Chairman, Commissioners and
Senior Staff.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jacqueline Graham, Staff Assistant to
the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission,
90 K Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington,
DC 20530, (202) 346–7010.
TIME AND DATE:
Dated: February 5, 2020.
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Acting Chairperson, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–02666 Filed 2–6–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Senior Executive Service; Appointment
of Members to the Performance
Review Board
Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) provides that
Notice of the Appointment of the
individual to serve as a member of the
Performance Review Board of the Senior
Executive Service shall be published in
the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
The following individuals are hereby
appointed to serve on the Department’s
Performance Review Board:
Permanent Membership
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0053]
Chair—Deputy Secretary
Vice-Chair—Assistant Secretary for
Administration and Management
Alternate Vice-Chair—Chief Human
Capital Officer
Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratories; Proposed Policy for
Transitioning to Satellite Notification
and Acceptance Program (SNAP)
Termination
Rotating Membership—
AGENCY:
Appointments Expire on 09/30/21
BLS Nancy Ruiz De Gamboa, Associate
Commissioner for Administration
EBSA Amy Turner, Deputy Assistant
Secretary
ETA Nicholas Lalpuis, Regional
Administrator, Dallas
ILAB Martha Newton, Deputy
Undersecretary for International
Affairs
MSHA Patricia Silvey, Deputy
Assistant Secretary
OASAM Geoffrey Kenyon, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Budget
OLMS Stephen Willertz, Director,
Office of Field Operations
OSHA Galen Blanton, Regional
Administrator, Boston
OSHA Loren Sweatt, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary
SOL Kate O’Scannlain, Solicitor of
Labor
VETS Ivan Denton, Director, National
Programs
WHD Patrice Torres, Associate
Director, Administrative Operations
Rotating Membership—
Appointment Expires on 09/30/23
ETA Debra Carr, Deputy
Administrator, Office of Job Corps
For Further Information Contact: Mr.
Demeatric Gamble, Chief, Division of
Executive Resources, Room N2453, U.S.
Department of Labor, Frances Perkins
Building, 200 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202)
693–7694.
Signed at Washington, DC, on the 1st day
of February 2020.
Bryan Slater,
Assistant Secretary for Administration and
Management.
[FR Doc. 2020–02525 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
In this notice, OSHA proposes
a policy for transitioning to the
termination of the Satellite Notification
and Acceptance Program (SNAP).
DATES: Submit comments, information,
and documents in response to this
notice, on or before March 11, 2020. All
submissions must bear a postmark or
provide other evidence of the
submission date.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at: https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
using this method, you must submit a
copy of your comments and attachments
to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA–2007–0053, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–3653,
200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries
(hand, express mail, messenger, and
courier service) are accepted during the
Docket Office’s normal business hours,
10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET. Note that
security procedures may result in
significant delays in receiving
comments and other written materials
by regular mail.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the above
address. All documents in the docket
(including this Federal Register notice)
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index under
Docket number OSHA–2007–0053;
however, some information (e.g.,
copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Notices
the website. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA–2007–0053). All
comments, including any personal
information you provide, are placed in
the public docket without change, and
may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank
Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, U.S. Department of
Labor by phone: (202) 693–1999; email:
meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson, Director,
Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, Directorate of
Technical Support and Emergency
Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, phone: (202)
693–2110 or email: robinson.kevin@
dol.gov.
Copies of this Federal Register
notice: Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice are available at https://
www.regulations.gov. This Federal
Register notice, as well as other relevant
information, is also available on OSHA’s
web page at https://www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
A. Nationally Recognized Testing
Laboratories (NRTL) Program
Many of OSHA’s safety standards
require employers to use products tested
and certified as safe (e.g., 29 CFR 1910,
subpart S). In general, testing
laboratories, and not employers,
perform the required testing and
certification. To ensure that the testing
and certification performed on products
is appropriate, OSHA implemented the
NRTL Program. This program
establishes the criteria that a testing
laboratory must meet to achieve, and
retain, NRTL recognition.
OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies
that the organization meets the legal
requirements specified in 29 CFR
1910.7, the regulatory provision
containing the requirements an
organization must meet to become a
NRTL and retain NRTL status.
Recognition is an acknowledgment by
OSHA that the organization can perform
independent safety testing and
certification of the specific products
covered within the organization’s scope
of recognition, and is not a delegation or
grant of government authority.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
Recognition under the NRTL Program,
therefore, enables employers to use
products approved by NRTLs to meet
OSHA standards that require product
testing and certification.
Each NRTL is approved for a scope of
recognition, which identifies: (a) The
type of products the NRTL may
approve; and (b) the NRTL’s
‘‘recognized sites.’’ The requirements for
NRTL recognition are outlined in the
NRTL Program Regulation at 29 CFR
1910.7 and Appendix A to that
regulation.
B. NRTL Program Directive
The NRTL Program Directive sets
forth OSHA policies, procedures, and
interpretations that supplement and
clarify the NRTL Program regulation, 29
CFR 1910.7 and Appendix A (NRTL
Program Policies, Procedures and
Guidelines, CPL 01–00–004, available at
https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/
files/enforcement/directives/CPL_01-00004.pdf). OSHA recently revised the
NRTL Program Directive, on October 1,
2019.
The revised NRTL Program Directive
contains a revised definition of
‘‘recognized site.’’ To be recognized, ‘‘a
site must be administratively and
operationally controlled by the NRTL
and must perform at least one of the
following functions: Testing and
inspection (and/or accepting test data or
inspections), performing reviews, or
making certification decisions with the
NRTL management system’’ (NRTL
Program Directive, Annex C). In revising
the definition, OSHA eliminated
ownership requirements contained in
the prior definition of recognized site
(Id., Ch. 1.IX.D). Thus, to be a
recognized site, the site no longer has to
be owned by the NRTL.
Prior to issuing the revised NRTL
Program Directive (CPL–01–004), OSHA
permitted NRTLs use a number of
different supplemental programs in
order to use the services of other
facilities to test and certify products
used in the workplace (60 FR 12980, 74
FR 923). One of these supplemental
programs was Supplemental Program
10, SNAP, that was implemented on
May 11, 2009 (74 FR 923) and permitted
NRTLs to perform certain functions to
support testing and certification
operations at ‘‘SNAP sites.’’ Under
SNAP, a NRTL had to have
administrative and operational control
over the NRTL’s SNAP sites. However,
the majority of SNAP sites could not be
‘‘recognized sites’’ because of the
ownership requirements that were then
contained in the definition of
recognized sites in the old NRTL
Directive (i.e., a majority of the sites
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7607
could not be ‘‘recognized sites’’ because
they were not owned by the NTRLs).
OSHA terminated all the
supplemental programs, including
SNAP, in the revised NRTL Program
Directive (Ch. 1.IX.B, D). SNAP is no
longer necessary because the revised
definition of ‘‘recognized site’’ permits
OSHA to recognize sites that are
administratively and operationally
controlled by the NRTL but not
necessarily owned by the NRTL. As
OSHA noted in the revised Directive,
NRTLs will now be able to apply to
OSHA to make existing SNAP sites
recognized sites (Id.).
C. Revised NRTL Program Directive
Implementation Memorandum
After issuing the revised NRTL
Program Directive, OSHA issued a
policy memorandum on the transition
from the prior version to the current
version of the NRTL Program Directive
(available at https://www.osha.gov/dts/
otpca/nrtl/NRTLDirectiveTransition
Memo.html). A portion of that policy
memorandum pertains to existing
NRTLs applying for expansion of
recognition and provides:
• Existing NRTLs (each organization
OSHA recognized as a NRTL on October
1, 2019) must comply with the
requirements of the revised NRTL
Program Directive no later than October
1, 2020. Existing NRTLs may comply
with the requirements of the prior NRTL
Directive (CPL–01–00–003) until
September 30, 2020.
• OSHA will evaluate pending
expansion applications for existing
NRTLs under the prior NRTL Program
Directive to the extent final decisions on
those applications are published in the
Federal Register prior to October 1,
2020. Assuming OSHA grants the
expansion application, the NRTL will
need to be in full compliance with the
revised NRTL Program Directive, with
respect to the NRTL’s entire scope of
recognition, no later than October 1,
2020. For example, if OSHA publishes
a final decision on an expansion
application in the Federal Register on
September 30, 2020, then the NRTL will
have to be in full compliance with the
revised NRTL Program Directive, with
respect to the NRTL’s entire scope of
recognition, no later than October 1,
2020.
• OSHA will evaluate pending
expansion applications for existing
NRTLs under the revised NRTL Program
Directive to the extent final decisions on
those applications are published in the
Federal Register on or after October 1,
2020. Depending on the status of the
application, OSHA may, in the
discretion of the agency, waive certain
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7608
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
fees associated with the application to
the extent accrual of those fees are due
solely to OSHA’s transition to the
revised NRTL Program Directive.
Assuming OSHA grants the expansion
application, the NRTL will need to be in
compliance with the revised NRTL
Program Directive with respect to the
NRTL’s expanded scope immediately
(i.e., on the date the final decision on
the expansion application is published
in the Federal Register).
• Audits and assessments of existing
NRTLs conducted on or after October 1,
2019, will be conducted under the
revised NRTL Program Directive.
However, until October 1, 2020, items
that OSHA would normally note as
nonconformances with the revised
NRTL Program Directive requiring
timely response and correction will be
noted as observations or long term
corrective actions. While such
observations and long term corrective
actions will not require a response and
correction in connection with the
relevant audit or assessment, existing
NRTLs will need to comply with the
revised NRTL Program Directive no later
than October 1, 2020.
II. OSHA’s Proposed Transition Policy
OSHA recognizes that immediate
termination of the SNAP may cause an
undue burden on some NRTLs with
existing SNAP sites. OSHA therefore
proposes the following policy to permit
a smooth transition to SNAP
termination for NRTLs with existing
SNAP sites. Although OSHA is not
required by the Administrative
Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, et seq., to
engage in notice and comment
rulemaking procedures prior to the
adoption and implementation of this
proposed policy, OSHA is requesting
public comment regarding the proposed
policy in order to gain input and insight
from interested parties.
OSHA notes that, as of October 1,
2019 (the date OSHA issued the revised
NRTL Program Directive), in accordance
with current OSHA policy, OSHA will
reject any application submitted by a
NRTL or NRTL applicant-organization
to be recognized for any of the previous
supplemental programs, including
SNAP. Under the proposed policy,
SNAP would be entirely terminated one
year after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy. Prior to that time, if a NRTL with
existing SNAP sites followed the
proposed procedures described in this
Notice, that NRTL could continue to
perform SNAP activities at the NRTL’s
existing SNAP sites (for a period, or
periods, that would be established by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
this proposed policy, and ending no
later than one year after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy).
OSHA notes that the policies proposed
in this Notice would supersede the
policies contained in the Revised NRTL
Program Directive Implementation
Memorandum (discussed above), to the
extent there is a conflict.
Proposed Procedures for the
Conversion of Existing SNAP Sites to
Recognized Sites and the Interim
Performance of SNAP Activities at
SNAP Sites. OSHA proposes the
following procedures to allow for the
conversion of existing SNAP sites to
NRTL-recognized sites under 29 CFR
1910.7 and the interim performance of
SNAP activities at SNAP sites:
1. Preconditions of Eligibility. To meet
the preconditions of eligibility, a NRTL
would need to:
a. Submit to OSHA a list of the
NRTL’s existing SNAP sites no later
than the 30th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy. For
each SNAP site listed, a NRTL would
need to include the date the SNAP site
was approved by the NRTL.
b. Not designate any new SNAP sites
after submitting to OSHA the list of
existing SNAP sites.
c. Submit to OSHA an application for
scope expansion (i.e., to convert existing
SNAP sites to recognized sites) no later
than the 60th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy.
d. Include in the scope expansion
application a list of the SNAP sites the
NRTL wants converted to recognized
sites. The NRTL would be permitted to
include in the scope expansion
application list only those SNAP sites
the NRTL also included in the list of
SNAP sites it submitted to OSHA by the
30th day after the date of publication of
the Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy.
e. Specify that it wants the scope
expansion application processed under
the proposed procedures described here.
f. Submit to OSHA all required
application fees as outlined in the
Revised NRTL Schedule of Fees. See
https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/
nrtlfees.html. The following fees would
need to accompany the scope expansion
application: $2,490 for the Expansion
application—Limited review; and
$2,490 for each site for which the NRTL
seeks recognition. (Other fees would be
invoiced as necessary (for example the
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$3,180 fee for a Federal Register notice
application, and fees for onsite
assessments, if conducted)).
g. At a minimum, submit to OSHA,
for each SNAP site listed in the
application, the following historical
assessment records and supporting
documentation:
i. The NRTL functions performed at
the SNAP site (testing, certification—
audits of testing laboratories);
ii. Copies of any audit or other reports
of, or about, the SNAP site generated
(either internally (e.g., by the NRTL) or
externally (e.g., by OSHA or other
accreditor)) in connection with any
audits, assessments, or other
investigations conducted (a) by OSHA,
the NRTL, any other entity, and (b)
within the 30 months preceding the date
of publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy;
iii. Supporting Documentation that
shows (a) what was reviewed during
any audits, assessments, or other
investigations of the SNAP site
conducted by OSHA, the NRTL, any
other entity within the NRTL’s
organizational structure, or any other
investigative body, and within the 30
months preceding the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy, (b)
any nonconformances identified during
these audits, assessments, or
investigations, and (c) a root cause
analysis of these nonconformances; and
iv. An organizational chart for the
SNAP site identifying leadership and
employees involved with NRTL-related
work activities.
2. Continued Performance of SNAP
Activities at Existing SNAP Sites
Contingent on Timely Submission of
Documents.
a. If a NRTL fails to timely submit to
OSHA a list of the NRTL’s existing
SNAP sites (by the 30th day after the
date of publication of the Federal
Register notice announcing OSHA’s
final decision on this proposed policy),
the NRTL would be required to cease
performing SNAP activities at all of the
NRTL’s existing SNAP sites on the 31st
day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy.
b. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA
a list of the NRTL’s existing SNAP sites
(by the 30th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy), but
that list does not contain all of the
NRTL’s existing SNAP sites, the NRTL
would be required to cease performing
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Notices
SNAP activities at existing SNAP sites
not contained in the list on the 31st day
after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy.
c. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA
a list of the NRTL’s existing SNAP sites
(by the 30th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy), but
does not submit to OSHA a timely
application to convert the existing
SNAP sites in the list to recognized sites
(by the 60th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy), then
the NRTL would be required to cease
performing SNAP activities at all of the
NRTL’s existing SNAP sites no later
than the 61st day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy.
d. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA
a list of the NRTL’s existing SNAP sites
(by the 30th day after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy), and
then submits to OSHA a timely
application to convert only some of the
existing SNAP sites in the list to
recognized sites (by the 60th day after
the date of publication of the Federal
Register notice announcing OSHA’s
final decision on this proposed policy),
then the NRTL would be required to
cease performing SNAP activities at
SNAP sites that the NRTL did not list
in the application no later than the 61st
day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy.
e. OSHA might allow for short
extensions of these time limits, at the
discretion of the agency, and if good
cause is shown by the NRTL.
3. Effect of Meeting the Preconditions
of Eligibility. If a NRTL meets all the
preconditions of eligibility for a SNAP
site, it would be entitled to the
following:
a. Potential Streamlined Conversion.
OSHA typically performs onsite
assessments in connection with site
expansion requests. However, OSHA
might, at the discretion of the agency,
opt not to do so with respect to SNAP
sites that meet the preconditions of
eligibility. Appendix A to the NRTL
Program Regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7,
provides that, in reviewing expansion
applications, OSHA shall, as necessary,
conduct an on-site review of the testing
facilities of the applicant, and may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
decide not to conduct an on-site review,
where the substantive scope of the
request to expand recognition is closely
related to the current area of
recognition. Consistent with Appendix
A, OSHA would make determinations as
to whether on-site reviews are necessary
on a case-by-case basis.
b. Interim Performance of SNAP
Activities at SNAP Sites. NRTLs would
be permitted to continue performing
SNAP functions, but only at the SNAP
sites that are listed in the NRTL’s
application and that meet the
preconditions of eligibility, and only for
the time period(s) permitted by these
proposed procedures.
4. Review of Applications.
a. To the extent SNAP sites in an
application meet the preconditions of
eligibility, OSHA would review that
application, or portion of application, in
accordance with the NRTL Program
regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7, Appendix A
to that regulation, the Revised NRTL
Program Directive Implementation
Memorandum, discussed above, and
these proposed SNAP conversion
procedures, to determine the capability
of the SNAP site to operate as a NRTLrecognized site. OSHA would base this
determination on the documentation
submitted with the application,
historical on-site assessments of the
NRTL’s SNAP Sites and SNAP
Headquarters, and any other factors it
deems relevant, including, for example,
the conduct of an on-site assessment(s),
if deemed necessary.
b. In reviewing applications, or
portions of applications, concerning
SNAP sites that do not meet the
preconditions of eligibility, OSHA
would follow normal site expansion
procedures, including the conduct of
on-site assessments. NRTLs should
consult the NRTL Program regulation,
29 CFR 1910.7, Appendix A to that
regulation, and the Revised NRTL
Program Directive Implementation
Memorandum, discussed above, for the
procedures that OSHA would follow
with respect to these SNAP sites.
5. Opportunity to Respond
(Discretionary) for NRTLs That Specify
in Their Scope Expansion Applications
That They Want Their Applications
Processed Under the Proposed
Procedures Described. Although a NRTL
timely submits to OSHA a list of the
NRTL’s existing SNAP sites (by the 30th
day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy), and then submits to OSHA a
timely application to convert all or some
of the NRTL’s existing SNAP sites in the
list to recognized sites (by the 60th day
after the date of publication of the
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7609
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy), the NRTL might not meet one
or more of the other preconditions of
eligibility for some or all of the SNAP
sites listed in the application. For
example, a NRTL might fail to submit to
OSHA the required historical
assessments or supporting
documentation for one or more of the
SNAP sites listed in an application. In
addition, to make a determination on an
application, OSHA might require further
information or clarification, in addition
to the information that would be
required by the preconditions of
eligibility. Therefore, after conducting a
review of a scope expansion application
in which a NRTL specifies that it wants
the application processed under the
proposed procedures described here
(Precondition of Eligibility (e)), OSHA
might, at the discretion of the agency,
give the NRTL 15 days to provide
clarification or missing information.
a. If OSHA receives a timely response
from the applicant (within 15 days), or
a timely written request for an extension
(within 15 days) and subsequent
response within the time permitted for
extension (if the request for extension is
granted), OSHA would recommend a
positive or negative finding on the
application.
b. Alternatively, OSHA would treat
the application as a normal site
expansion application, outside of these
proposed procedures, if the NRTL
requested in a timely-filed response that
the application be treated as such. At
this point (when the NRTL made the
request), the NRTL would be required to
immediately cease performing SNAP
activities at the SNAP sites listed in the
application.
c. If OSHA does not receive a timely
response, or a timely request for an
extension and subsequent response
within the time permitted for extension
(if granted), it would consider the
application withdrawn.
6. Effect of a Negative Finding on an
Application. If a negative finding is
issued, the NRTL would have an
opportunity (a) to withdraw the
application, (b) revise the application
(for example, to remove from the
application those sites OSHA staff
considers non-compliant, or to indicate
that OSHA should process the
application as a traditional application
for site expansion rather than under
these proposed procedures), or (c)
request that the original application be
forwarded to the Assistant Secretary for
Occupational Safety and Health, as
outlined in Appendix A to the NRTL
Program regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
7610
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Notices
7. Effect of Withdrawal of an
Application Meeting the Preconditions
of Eligibility. If the application is
withdrawn by the applicant or
considered withdrawn by OSHA, the
NRTL would be required to immediately
cease performing SNAP activities at the
SNAP sites that were listed in the
withdrawn application and met the
preconditions of eligibility. While the
NRTL could still apply to have these
sites included in the NRTL’s scope of
recognition, OSHA would follow
normal site expansion procedures,
including the conduct of on-site
assessments, for any such applications.
8. Effect of the Revision of an
Application Meeting the Preconditions
of Eligibility. If the applicant revises the
application to remove from the
application individual SNAP sites listed
in the application, the NRTL would be
permitted to continue to perform SNAP
activities only at those SNAP sites that
remain in the application and meet the
preconditions of eligibility. The
applicant would be required to
immediately cease performing SNAP
activities at SNAP sites no longer in the
application. While the NRTL could still
apply for recognition of any sites
removed from the application, OSHA
would follow normal site expansion
procedures, including the conduct of
on-site assessments, for any such
applications.
9. Effect of Final Decision on
Application Meeting the Preconditions
of Eligibility. Once a final decision is
made regarding the capability of a SNAP
site to operate as a NRTL-recognized
site, this decision would be published
in the Federal Register, upon which
time the NRTL would be required to
immediately cease performing SNAP
activities at the SNAP sites that were
listed in the application and met the
preconditions of eligibility.
10. Termination of the SNAP Entirely.
A NRTL would be required to cease
performing SNAP activities at existing
SNAP sites that were listed in the
application and met the preconditions
of eligibility one year after the date of
publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA’s final
decision on this proposed policy. This
would be the case even if OSHA does
not issue a final decision on the NRTL’s
application by that date. The SNAP
would be entirely terminated one year
after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA’s final decision on this proposed
policy.
11. Potential Extension of SNAP
Termination Date. OSHA might, at the
discretion of the agency, extend the
SNAP termination date. OSHA notes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
that it would not extend the termination
date because final decisions on some
applications could not be issued on a
streamlined basis. OSHA would not be
able to issue a final decision on a
streamlined basis, for example, if it
determines that it needs to conduct an
on-site assessment or a negative finding
is issued in connection with an
application. An extension of the SNAP
termination date based on these timeintensive issues would not be justified.
OSHA requests comment on this
proposed policy. Comments should
consist of pertinent written documents
and exhibits. OSHA will review all
comments submitted to the docket in a
timely manner, and, after considering
the issues raised by these comments,
will make a recommendation to the
Assistant Secretary for Occupational
Safety and Health regarding this
proposed policy for transitioning to the
termination of SNAP, who will then
make a final decision.
OSHA will publish a public notice of
this final decision in the Federal
Register.
IV. Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health,
authorized the preparation of this
notice. Accordingly, the agency is
issuing this notice pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
657(g)(2)), Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912, Jan. 25, 2012),
and 29 CFR 1910.7.
Signed at Washington, DC, on February 4,
2020.
Loren Sweatt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor
for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2020–02564 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Sunshine Act Meeting
9:30am, Tuesday,
February 25, 2020
PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429
L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC
20594.
STATUS: The one item is open to the
public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
59775 Highway Accident Report—
Collision Between a Sport Utility
Vehicle Operating With Partial
Driving Automation and a Crash
Attenuator, Mountain View,
California, March 23, 2018
(HWY18FH011)
TIME AND DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Candi Bing at (202) 314–6403 or by
email at bingc@ntsb.gov.
Media Information Contact:
Christopher O’Neil by email at
christopher.oneil@ntsb.gov or at (202)
314–6100.
The press and public may enter the
NTSB Conference Center one hour prior
to the meeting for set up and seating.
Individuals requesting specific
accommodations should contact
Rochelle McCallister at (202) 314–6305
or by email at Rochelle.McCallister@
ntsb.gov by Wednesday, February 19,
2020.
The public may view the meeting via
a live or archived webcast by accessing
a link under ‘‘News & Events’’ on the
NTSB home page at www.ntsb.gov.
Schedule updates, including weatherrelated cancellations, are also available
at www.ntsb.gov.
The National Transportation Safety
Board is holding this meeting under the
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5
U.S.C. 552(b).
Dated: February 6, 2020.
LaSean R. McCray,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–02722 Filed 2–6–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2020–93 and CP2020–92]
New Postal Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing for the
Commission’s consideration concerning
negotiated service agreements. This
notice informs the public of the filing,
invites public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: February 12,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7606-7610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02564]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. OSHA-2007-0053]
Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories; Proposed Policy for
Transitioning to Satellite Notification and Acceptance Program (SNAP)
Termination
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA proposes a policy for transitioning to
the termination of the Satellite Notification and Acceptance Program
(SNAP).
DATES: Submit comments, information, and documents in response to this
notice, on or before March 11, 2020. All submissions must bear a
postmark or provide other evidence of the submission date.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at: https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2007-0053,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-3653, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the Docket Office's normal business hours, 10:00 a.m.
to 3:00 p.m., ET. Note that security procedures may result in
significant delays in receiving comments and other written materials by
regular mail.
Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index
under Docket number OSHA-2007-0053; however, some information (e.g.,
copyrighted material) is not publicly available to read or download
through
[[Page 7607]]
the website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are
available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA-2007-0053). All comments, including any personal
information you provide, are placed in the public docket without
change, and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor by phone: (202) 693-1999;
email: [email protected].
General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, phone: (202) 693-2110 or email:
[email protected].
Copies of this Federal Register notice: Electronic copies of this
Federal Register notice are available at https://www.regulations.gov.
This Federal Register notice, as well as other relevant information, is
also available on OSHA's web page at https://www.osha.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTL) Program
Many of OSHA's safety standards require employers to use products
tested and certified as safe (e.g., 29 CFR 1910, subpart S). In
general, testing laboratories, and not employers, perform the required
testing and certification. To ensure that the testing and certification
performed on products is appropriate, OSHA implemented the NRTL
Program. This program establishes the criteria that a testing
laboratory must meet to achieve, and retain, NRTL recognition.
OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the legal requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7, the regulatory
provision containing the requirements an organization must meet to
become a NRTL and retain NRTL status. Recognition is an acknowledgment
by OSHA that the organization can perform independent safety testing
and certification of the specific products covered within the
organization's scope of recognition, and is not a delegation or grant
of government authority. Recognition under the NRTL Program, therefore,
enables employers to use products approved by NRTLs to meet OSHA
standards that require product testing and certification.
Each NRTL is approved for a scope of recognition, which identifies:
(a) The type of products the NRTL may approve; and (b) the NRTL's
``recognized sites.'' The requirements for NRTL recognition are
outlined in the NRTL Program Regulation at 29 CFR 1910.7 and Appendix A
to that regulation.
B. NRTL Program Directive
The NRTL Program Directive sets forth OSHA policies, procedures,
and interpretations that supplement and clarify the NRTL Program
regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7 and Appendix A (NRTL Program Policies,
Procedures and Guidelines, CPL 01-00-004, available at https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/directives/CPL_01-00-004.pdf). OSHA recently revised the NRTL Program Directive, on October
1, 2019.
The revised NRTL Program Directive contains a revised definition of
``recognized site.'' To be recognized, ``a site must be
administratively and operationally controlled by the NRTL and must
perform at least one of the following functions: Testing and inspection
(and/or accepting test data or inspections), performing reviews, or
making certification decisions with the NRTL management system'' (NRTL
Program Directive, Annex C). In revising the definition, OSHA
eliminated ownership requirements contained in the prior definition of
recognized site (Id., Ch. 1.IX.D). Thus, to be a recognized site, the
site no longer has to be owned by the NRTL.
Prior to issuing the revised NRTL Program Directive (CPL-01-004),
OSHA permitted NRTLs use a number of different supplemental programs in
order to use the services of other facilities to test and certify
products used in the workplace (60 FR 12980, 74 FR 923). One of these
supplemental programs was Supplemental Program 10, SNAP, that was
implemented on May 11, 2009 (74 FR 923) and permitted NRTLs to perform
certain functions to support testing and certification operations at
``SNAP sites.'' Under SNAP, a NRTL had to have administrative and
operational control over the NRTL's SNAP sites. However, the majority
of SNAP sites could not be ``recognized sites'' because of the
ownership requirements that were then contained in the definition of
recognized sites in the old NRTL Directive (i.e., a majority of the
sites could not be ``recognized sites'' because they were not owned by
the NTRLs).
OSHA terminated all the supplemental programs, including SNAP, in
the revised NRTL Program Directive (Ch. 1.IX.B, D). SNAP is no longer
necessary because the revised definition of ``recognized site'' permits
OSHA to recognize sites that are administratively and operationally
controlled by the NRTL but not necessarily owned by the NRTL. As OSHA
noted in the revised Directive, NRTLs will now be able to apply to OSHA
to make existing SNAP sites recognized sites (Id.).
C. Revised NRTL Program Directive Implementation Memorandum
After issuing the revised NRTL Program Directive, OSHA issued a
policy memorandum on the transition from the prior version to the
current version of the NRTL Program Directive (available at https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/NRTLDirectiveTransition Memo.html). A
portion of that policy memorandum pertains to existing NRTLs applying
for expansion of recognition and provides:
Existing NRTLs (each organization OSHA recognized as a
NRTL on October 1, 2019) must comply with the requirements of the
revised NRTL Program Directive no later than October 1, 2020. Existing
NRTLs may comply with the requirements of the prior NRTL Directive
(CPL-01-00-003) until September 30, 2020.
OSHA will evaluate pending expansion applications for
existing NRTLs under the prior NRTL Program Directive to the extent
final decisions on those applications are published in the Federal
Register prior to October 1, 2020. Assuming OSHA grants the expansion
application, the NRTL will need to be in full compliance with the
revised NRTL Program Directive, with respect to the NRTL's entire scope
of recognition, no later than October 1, 2020. For example, if OSHA
publishes a final decision on an expansion application in the Federal
Register on September 30, 2020, then the NRTL will have to be in full
compliance with the revised NRTL Program Directive, with respect to the
NRTL's entire scope of recognition, no later than October 1, 2020.
OSHA will evaluate pending expansion applications for
existing NRTLs under the revised NRTL Program Directive to the extent
final decisions on those applications are published in the Federal
Register on or after October 1, 2020. Depending on the status of the
application, OSHA may, in the discretion of the agency, waive certain
[[Page 7608]]
fees associated with the application to the extent accrual of those
fees are due solely to OSHA's transition to the revised NRTL Program
Directive. Assuming OSHA grants the expansion application, the NRTL
will need to be in compliance with the revised NRTL Program Directive
with respect to the NRTL's expanded scope immediately (i.e., on the
date the final decision on the expansion application is published in
the Federal Register).
Audits and assessments of existing NRTLs conducted on or
after October 1, 2019, will be conducted under the revised NRTL Program
Directive. However, until October 1, 2020, items that OSHA would
normally note as nonconformances with the revised NRTL Program
Directive requiring timely response and correction will be noted as
observations or long term corrective actions. While such observations
and long term corrective actions will not require a response and
correction in connection with the relevant audit or assessment,
existing NRTLs will need to comply with the revised NRTL Program
Directive no later than October 1, 2020.
II. OSHA's Proposed Transition Policy
OSHA recognizes that immediate termination of the SNAP may cause an
undue burden on some NRTLs with existing SNAP sites. OSHA therefore
proposes the following policy to permit a smooth transition to SNAP
termination for NRTLs with existing SNAP sites. Although OSHA is not
required by the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. 551, et seq.,
to engage in notice and comment rulemaking procedures prior to the
adoption and implementation of this proposed policy, OSHA is requesting
public comment regarding the proposed policy in order to gain input and
insight from interested parties.
OSHA notes that, as of October 1, 2019 (the date OSHA issued the
revised NRTL Program Directive), in accordance with current OSHA
policy, OSHA will reject any application submitted by a NRTL or NRTL
applicant-organization to be recognized for any of the previous
supplemental programs, including SNAP. Under the proposed policy, SNAP
would be entirely terminated one year after the date of publication of
the Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy. Prior to that time, if a NRTL with existing SNAP sites
followed the proposed procedures described in this Notice, that NRTL
could continue to perform SNAP activities at the NRTL's existing SNAP
sites (for a period, or periods, that would be established by this
proposed policy, and ending no later than one year after the date of
publication of the Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final
decision on this proposed policy). OSHA notes that the policies
proposed in this Notice would supersede the policies contained in the
Revised NRTL Program Directive Implementation Memorandum (discussed
above), to the extent there is a conflict.
Proposed Procedures for the Conversion of Existing SNAP Sites to
Recognized Sites and the Interim Performance of SNAP Activities at SNAP
Sites. OSHA proposes the following procedures to allow for the
conversion of existing SNAP sites to NRTL-recognized sites under 29 CFR
1910.7 and the interim performance of SNAP activities at SNAP sites:
1. Preconditions of Eligibility. To meet the preconditions of
eligibility, a NRTL would need to:
a. Submit to OSHA a list of the NRTL's existing SNAP sites no later
than the 30th day after the date of publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy. For
each SNAP site listed, a NRTL would need to include the date the SNAP
site was approved by the NRTL.
b. Not designate any new SNAP sites after submitting to OSHA the
list of existing SNAP sites.
c. Submit to OSHA an application for scope expansion (i.e., to
convert existing SNAP sites to recognized sites) no later than the 60th
day after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy.
d. Include in the scope expansion application a list of the SNAP
sites the NRTL wants converted to recognized sites. The NRTL would be
permitted to include in the scope expansion application list only those
SNAP sites the NRTL also included in the list of SNAP sites it
submitted to OSHA by the 30th day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy.
e. Specify that it wants the scope expansion application processed
under the proposed procedures described here.
f. Submit to OSHA all required application fees as outlined in the
Revised NRTL Schedule of Fees. See https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtlfees.html. The following fees would need to accompany the scope
expansion application: $2,490 for the Expansion application--Limited
review; and $2,490 for each site for which the NRTL seeks recognition.
(Other fees would be invoiced as necessary (for example the $3,180 fee
for a Federal Register notice application, and fees for onsite
assessments, if conducted)).
g. At a minimum, submit to OSHA, for each SNAP site listed in the
application, the following historical assessment records and supporting
documentation:
i. The NRTL functions performed at the SNAP site (testing,
certification--audits of testing laboratories);
ii. Copies of any audit or other reports of, or about, the SNAP
site generated (either internally (e.g., by the NRTL) or externally
(e.g., by OSHA or other accreditor)) in connection with any audits,
assessments, or other investigations conducted (a) by OSHA, the NRTL,
any other entity, and (b) within the 30 months preceding the date of
publication of the Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final
decision on this proposed policy;
iii. Supporting Documentation that shows (a) what was reviewed
during any audits, assessments, or other investigations of the SNAP
site conducted by OSHA, the NRTL, any other entity within the NRTL's
organizational structure, or any other investigative body, and within
the 30 months preceding the date of publication of the Federal Register
notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy, (b)
any nonconformances identified during these audits, assessments, or
investigations, and (c) a root cause analysis of these nonconformances;
and
iv. An organizational chart for the SNAP site identifying
leadership and employees involved with NRTL-related work activities.
2. Continued Performance of SNAP Activities at Existing SNAP Sites
Contingent on Timely Submission of Documents.
a. If a NRTL fails to timely submit to OSHA a list of the NRTL's
existing SNAP sites (by the 30th day after the date of publication of
the Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy), the NRTL would be required to cease performing SNAP
activities at all of the NRTL's existing SNAP sites on the 31st day
after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice announcing
OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy.
b. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA a list of the NRTL's existing
SNAP sites (by the 30th day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy), but that list does not contain all of the NRTL's
existing SNAP sites, the NRTL would be required to cease performing
[[Page 7609]]
SNAP activities at existing SNAP sites not contained in the list on the
31st day after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy.
c. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA a list of the NRTL's existing
SNAP sites (by the 30th day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy), but does not submit to OSHA a timely application to
convert the existing SNAP sites in the list to recognized sites (by the
60th day after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy), then the
NRTL would be required to cease performing SNAP activities at all of
the NRTL's existing SNAP sites no later than the 61st day after the
date of publication of the Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's
final decision on this proposed policy.
d. If a NRTL timely submits to OSHA a list of the NRTL's existing
SNAP sites (by the 30th day after the date of publication of the
Federal Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this
proposed policy), and then submits to OSHA a timely application to
convert only some of the existing SNAP sites in the list to recognized
sites (by the 60th day after the date of publication of the Federal
Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed
policy), then the NRTL would be required to cease performing SNAP
activities at SNAP sites that the NRTL did not list in the application
no later than the 61st day after the date of publication of the Federal
Register notice announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed
policy.
e. OSHA might allow for short extensions of these time limits, at
the discretion of the agency, and if good cause is shown by the NRTL.
3. Effect of Meeting the Preconditions of Eligibility. If a NRTL
meets all the preconditions of eligibility for a SNAP site, it would be
entitled to the following:
a. Potential Streamlined Conversion. OSHA typically performs onsite
assessments in connection with site expansion requests. However, OSHA
might, at the discretion of the agency, opt not to do so with respect
to SNAP sites that meet the preconditions of eligibility. Appendix A to
the NRTL Program Regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7, provides that, in reviewing
expansion applications, OSHA shall, as necessary, conduct an on-site
review of the testing facilities of the applicant, and may decide not
to conduct an on-site review, where the substantive scope of the
request to expand recognition is closely related to the current area of
recognition. Consistent with Appendix A, OSHA would make determinations
as to whether on-site reviews are necessary on a case-by-case basis.
b. Interim Performance of SNAP Activities at SNAP Sites. NRTLs
would be permitted to continue performing SNAP functions, but only at
the SNAP sites that are listed in the NRTL's application and that meet
the preconditions of eligibility, and only for the time period(s)
permitted by these proposed procedures.
4. Review of Applications.
a. To the extent SNAP sites in an application meet the
preconditions of eligibility, OSHA would review that application, or
portion of application, in accordance with the NRTL Program regulation,
29 CFR 1910.7, Appendix A to that regulation, the Revised NRTL Program
Directive Implementation Memorandum, discussed above, and these
proposed SNAP conversion procedures, to determine the capability of the
SNAP site to operate as a NRTL-recognized site. OSHA would base this
determination on the documentation submitted with the application,
historical on-site assessments of the NRTL's SNAP Sites and SNAP
Headquarters, and any other factors it deems relevant, including, for
example, the conduct of an on-site assessment(s), if deemed necessary.
b. In reviewing applications, or portions of applications,
concerning SNAP sites that do not meet the preconditions of
eligibility, OSHA would follow normal site expansion procedures,
including the conduct of on-site assessments. NRTLs should consult the
NRTL Program regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7, Appendix A to that regulation,
and the Revised NRTL Program Directive Implementation Memorandum,
discussed above, for the procedures that OSHA would follow with respect
to these SNAP sites.
5. Opportunity to Respond (Discretionary) for NRTLs That Specify in
Their Scope Expansion Applications That They Want Their Applications
Processed Under the Proposed Procedures Described. Although a NRTL
timely submits to OSHA a list of the NRTL's existing SNAP sites (by the
30th day after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy), and then
submits to OSHA a timely application to convert all or some of the
NRTL's existing SNAP sites in the list to recognized sites (by the 60th
day after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy), the NRTL
might not meet one or more of the other preconditions of eligibility
for some or all of the SNAP sites listed in the application. For
example, a NRTL might fail to submit to OSHA the required historical
assessments or supporting documentation for one or more of the SNAP
sites listed in an application. In addition, to make a determination on
an application, OSHA might require further information or
clarification, in addition to the information that would be required by
the preconditions of eligibility. Therefore, after conducting a review
of a scope expansion application in which a NRTL specifies that it
wants the application processed under the proposed procedures described
here (Precondition of Eligibility (e)), OSHA might, at the discretion
of the agency, give the NRTL 15 days to provide clarification or
missing information.
a. If OSHA receives a timely response from the applicant (within 15
days), or a timely written request for an extension (within 15 days)
and subsequent response within the time permitted for extension (if the
request for extension is granted), OSHA would recommend a positive or
negative finding on the application.
b. Alternatively, OSHA would treat the application as a normal site
expansion application, outside of these proposed procedures, if the
NRTL requested in a timely-filed response that the application be
treated as such. At this point (when the NRTL made the request), the
NRTL would be required to immediately cease performing SNAP activities
at the SNAP sites listed in the application.
c. If OSHA does not receive a timely response, or a timely request
for an extension and subsequent response within the time permitted for
extension (if granted), it would consider the application withdrawn.
6. Effect of a Negative Finding on an Application. If a negative
finding is issued, the NRTL would have an opportunity (a) to withdraw
the application, (b) revise the application (for example, to remove
from the application those sites OSHA staff considers non-compliant, or
to indicate that OSHA should process the application as a traditional
application for site expansion rather than under these proposed
procedures), or (c) request that the original application be forwarded
to the Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health, as
outlined in Appendix A to the NRTL Program regulation, 29 CFR 1910.7.
[[Page 7610]]
7. Effect of Withdrawal of an Application Meeting the Preconditions
of Eligibility. If the application is withdrawn by the applicant or
considered withdrawn by OSHA, the NRTL would be required to immediately
cease performing SNAP activities at the SNAP sites that were listed in
the withdrawn application and met the preconditions of eligibility.
While the NRTL could still apply to have these sites included in the
NRTL's scope of recognition, OSHA would follow normal site expansion
procedures, including the conduct of on-site assessments, for any such
applications.
8. Effect of the Revision of an Application Meeting the
Preconditions of Eligibility. If the applicant revises the application
to remove from the application individual SNAP sites listed in the
application, the NRTL would be permitted to continue to perform SNAP
activities only at those SNAP sites that remain in the application and
meet the preconditions of eligibility. The applicant would be required
to immediately cease performing SNAP activities at SNAP sites no longer
in the application. While the NRTL could still apply for recognition of
any sites removed from the application, OSHA would follow normal site
expansion procedures, including the conduct of on-site assessments, for
any such applications.
9. Effect of Final Decision on Application Meeting the
Preconditions of Eligibility. Once a final decision is made regarding
the capability of a SNAP site to operate as a NRTL-recognized site,
this decision would be published in the Federal Register, upon which
time the NRTL would be required to immediately cease performing SNAP
activities at the SNAP sites that were listed in the application and
met the preconditions of eligibility.
10. Termination of the SNAP Entirely. A NRTL would be required to
cease performing SNAP activities at existing SNAP sites that were
listed in the application and met the preconditions of eligibility one
year after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy. This would be
the case even if OSHA does not issue a final decision on the NRTL's
application by that date. The SNAP would be entirely terminated one
year after the date of publication of the Federal Register notice
announcing OSHA's final decision on this proposed policy.
11. Potential Extension of SNAP Termination Date. OSHA might, at
the discretion of the agency, extend the SNAP termination date. OSHA
notes that it would not extend the termination date because final
decisions on some applications could not be issued on a streamlined
basis. OSHA would not be able to issue a final decision on a
streamlined basis, for example, if it determines that it needs to
conduct an on-site assessment or a negative finding is issued in
connection with an application. An extension of the SNAP termination
date based on these time-intensive issues would not be justified.
OSHA requests comment on this proposed policy. Comments should
consist of pertinent written documents and exhibits. OSHA will review
all comments submitted to the docket in a timely manner, and, after
considering the issues raised by these comments, will make a
recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and
Health regarding this proposed policy for transitioning to the
termination of SNAP, who will then make a final decision.
OSHA will publish a public notice of this final decision in the
Federal Register.
IV. Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this
notice. Accordingly, the agency is issuing this notice pursuant to 29
U.S.C. 657(g)(2)), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912,
Jan. 25, 2012), and 29 CFR 1910.7.
Signed at Washington, DC, on February 4, 2020.
Loren Sweatt,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2020-02564 Filed 2-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P