Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017-2018, 7282-7286 [2020-02471]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
7282
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices
diversity of the supply chain sector,
including with regard to geographic
location and company size.
Members of the Committee shall
represent companies, organizations, and
stakeholders involved in the U.S.
supply chain, with at least one
individual representing each of the
following: Supply chain firms or their
associations; users of supply chains
(e.g., retailers, distributors,
manufacturers or other sectors); freight
transportation providers; ports; and
academia. Based on the balance of
viewpoints currently represented on the
Committee, representatives from the
trucking, air transport, energy, logistics,
supply chain financing, warehousing,
terminal operators, retailers, and supply
chain compliance sectors are
encouraged to apply.
Other than the experts from academia,
all members shall serve in a
representative capacity, expressing the
views and interests of a U.S. company
or U.S. organization, as well as its
particular sector. Members serving in
such a representative capacity are not
Special Government Employees. The
members from academia serve as
experts and therefore are Special
Government Employees (SGEs) and
shall be subject to the ethical standards
applicable to SGEs. Members who serve
as SGEs must certify that they are not
Federally registered lobbyists.
Each member of the Committee must
be a U.S. citizen and not registered as
a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents
Registration Act. All appointments are
made without regard to political
affiliation. Self-nominations will be
accepted.
Members of the Committee will not be
compensated for their services or
reimbursed for their travel expenses.
The Committee shall meet
approximately quarterly, or as
determined by the DFO.
Members shall serve at the pleasure of
the Secretary.
All nominations for membership on
the Committee should provide the
following information:
(1) Name, title, and relevant contact
information (including phone, fax, and
email address) of the individual
requesting consideration; and
(2) An affirmative statement that the
applicant is not required to register as
a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents
Registration Act of 1938.
In addition to the above requirements
for all nominations, nominations for
representatives of companies,
organizations, and stakeholders
involved in the U.S. supply chain,
including supply chain firms or their
associations; users of supply chains
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
(e.g., retailers, distributors,
manufacturers, or other sectors); freight
transportation providers; and ports,
should also provide the following
information:
(1) A sponsor letter on the letterhead
of the sponsoring U.S. company or U.S.
organization to be represented,
containing a brief description why the
nominee should be considered for
membership;
(2) Short biography of nominee
including credentials;
(3) Brief description of the U.S.
company or U.S. organization to be
represented and its activities and size
(number of employees or members and
annual sales, if applicable); and
(4) An affirmative statement that the
applicant meets all Committee
eligibility requirements for
representative members, including that
the applicant represents a U.S. company
or U.S. organization.
a. For purposes of Committee
eligibility, a U.S. company is at least 51
percent owned by U.S. persons.
b. For purposes of Committee
eligibility, a U.S. organization is
controlled by U.S. persons, as
determined based on its board of
directors (or comparable governing
body), membership, and funding
sources, as applicable.
In addition to the above requirements
for all nominations, nominations for
experts from academia should also
provide the following information:
(1) A description of the nominee’s
area(s) of expertise;
(2) A concise Curriculum Vitae (CV)
or resume that covers education,
experience, and relevant publications
and summarizes how this expertise
addresses supply chain
competitiveness;
(3) An affirmative statement that the
applicant meets all Committee
eligibility requirements.
Please do not send company or
organization brochures.
Nominations may be emailed to
richard.boll@trade.gov, faxed to the
attention of Richard Boll at 202–482–
2669, or mailed to Richard Boll, Office
of Supply Chain, Professional &
Business Services, Room 11004, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, and must be received on or
before February 28, 2020. Nominees
selected for appointment to the
Committee will be notified.
Dated: February 4, 2020.
Maureen Smith,
Director, Office of Supply Chain and
Professional & Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–02455 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–857]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products
From Canada: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Rescission of Review, in
Part; 2017–2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
softwood lumber products (softwood
lumber) from Canada. The period of
review (POR) is June 30, 2017 through
December 31, 2018. Commerce
preliminarily determines that the
producers/exporters subject to this
review made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value.
We invite interested parties to comment
on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable February 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jeff Pederson
(Canfor), Stephen Bailey (Resolute), and
Thomas Martin (West Fraser), AD/CVD
Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2769, (202) 482–0193, and
(202) 482–3936, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 1, 2019, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of an antidumping
duty administrative review on softwood
lumber from Canada.1 On April 1, 2019,
based on timely requests for
administrative reviews, Commerce
initiated an AD administrative review
covering 1,224 companies.2 As
discussed below, we have rescinded on
all but 257 companies. Thus, the review
covers 257 producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise, including
mandatory respondents Canfor,3
1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
12209 (April 1, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
2 Id.
3 As described in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, we have treated Canfor Corporation,
Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood
Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a
single entity. See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain
Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2017–
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices
Resolute,4 and West Fraser.5 The
remaining companies were not selected
for individual examination and remain
subject to this administrative review.
The POR is June 30, 2017 through
December 31, 2018. On September 6,
2019, we extended the preliminary
results until January 31, 2020.6
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this review is
softwood lumber from Canada. For a full
description of the scope, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.7
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of the
topics included in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is included as
Appendix I to this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed and electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party or parties that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. All
requests for administrative review were
timely withdrawn for certain
companies. Therefore, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are
rescinding this administrative review
with respect to certain companies
named in the Initiation Notice.8 For a
list of the remaining companies in this
review, see Appendix II.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in
Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
We preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the period June 30,
2017 through December 31, 2018:
Preliminary Results of the
Administrative Review
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Exporter/producer
Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd ...............................................................
Resolute Growth Canada Inc./Forest Products Mauricie LP, Socie´te´ en commandite Scierie Opitciwan/Resolute-LP Engineered
Wood Larouche Inc./Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership/Resolute FP Canada Inc .............................
West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc ............................
All Others .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Rate for Companies Not Individually
Examined
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Generally, when calculating margins
for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act for guidance, which provides
instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation.
Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides
that when calculating the all-others
margin, Commerce will exclude any
zero and de minimis weighted-average
dumping margins, as well as any
weighted-average dumping margins
based on total facts available.
Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice
has been to average the margins for
selected respondents, excluding margins
that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available.
2018,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), at 5.
4 As described in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, we have treated Resolute Growth
Canada Inc., Forest Products Mauricie LP, Socie´te´
en commandite Scierie Opitciwan, Resolute-LP
Engineered Wood Larouche Inc., Resolute-LP
Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership,
and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively, Resolute)
as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
7283
In this review, we calculated a
weighted-average dumping margin of
2.02 percent for Canfor, 1.18 percent for
Resolute, and 1.57 percent for West
Fraser. In accordance with section
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce
assigned the weighted-average of these
three calculated weighted-average
dumping margins, 1.66 percent, to the
non-selected companies in these
preliminary results. The rate calculated
for the non-selected companies is a
weighted-average percentage margin
which is calculated based on the U.S.
values of the three reviewed companies
with an affirmative antidumping duty
margin.9 Accordingly, we have applied
a rate of 1.66 percent to the non-selected
companies.10
5 As described in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, we have treated West Fraser Mills
Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest
Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc.
(collectively, West Fraser) as a single entity. See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6–7.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Softwood Lumber
Products from Canada: Extension of Deadline for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review—2017–2018,’’ dated
September 6, 2019.
7 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–5.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2.02
1.18
1.57
1.66
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these preliminary results
to the interested parties within five days
after public announcement of the
preliminary results in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance not later
than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice, unless
Commerce alters the time limit. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
five days after the date for filing case
briefs.11 Parties who submit case briefs
or rebuttal briefs in this administrative
8 See
Initiation Notice, 84 FR at 12209.
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United
Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order
in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010).
10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for
Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated January 31,
2020.
11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
9 See
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
7284
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices
review are encouraged to submit with
each argument: (1) A statement of the
issue, (2) a brief summary of the
argument, and (3) a table of
authorities.12
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, must submit a written request
to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety via
ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.13 Requests
should contain: (1) The party’s name,
address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs.
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of these preliminary results
in the Federal Register, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless
extended.
Assessment Rate
For the companies for which this
review is rescinded, antidumping duties
shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends
to issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
for those companies 15 days after
publication of this notice.
Upon issuance of the final results,
Commerce will determine, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.14 If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is above de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate based on the
ratio of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of the
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).15 If a respondent’s
12 See
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
19 CFR 351.310(c).
14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
15 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
13 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
weighted-average dumping margin or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis in the final results of
review, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties in
accordance with the Final Modification
for Reviews.16 The final results of this
administrative review shall be the basis
for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise under
review and for future deposits of
estimated duties, where applicable. We
intend to issue liquidation instructions
to CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements for estimated antidumping
duties will be effective upon publication
of the notice of final results of this
review for all shipments of softwood
lumber from Canada entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for companies subject to
this review will be equal to the dumping
margin established in the final results of
the review; (2) for merchandise exported
by companies not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but
the producer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recently completed segment for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will continue to be 6.58
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.17 These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this period
of review. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
16 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at
8103; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
17 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products From
Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
51806 (November 8, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: January 31, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates
V. Rescission of Administrative Review, In
Part
VI. Particular Market Situation Allegation
VII. Unexamined Respondents
VIII. Discussion of the Methodology
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies for Which This Administrative
Review Is Not Being Rescinded
1. 1074712 BC Ltd.
2. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
3. 752615 B.C Ltd, Fraserview
Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview
Cedar Products.
4. 9224–5737 Que´bec inc. (aka, A.G. Bois)
5. A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc.
6. Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd.
7. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8. Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd.
9. Aler Forest Products, Ltd.
10. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
11. American Pacific Wood Products
12. Anbrook Industries Ltd.
13. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
14. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.
15. Anglo-American Cedar Products, LTD.
16. Antrim Cedar Corporation
17. Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd.
18. Arbec Lumber Inc.
19. Aspen Planers Ltd.
20. B&L Forest Products Ltd
21. B.B. Pallets Inc.
22. Babine Forest Products Limited
23. Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
24. Bardobec Inc.
25. Barrette-Chapais Ltee
26. BarretteWood Inc.
27. Benoıˆt & Dionne Produits Forestiers Lte´e
28. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
29. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
30. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
31. Bois Aise´ de Montre´al inc.
32. Bois Bonsaı¨ inc.
33. Bois D’oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka, Cedrico
Lumber Inc.)
34. Bois Daaquam inc.
35. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc.
36. Boisaco
37. Boscus Canada Inc.
38. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices
39. BPWood Ltd.
40. Bramwood Forest Inc.
41. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
42. Busque & Laflamme Inc.
43. C&C Wood Products Ltd.
44. Caledonia Forest Products Inc.
45. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd.
46. Canadian American Forest Products Ltd.
47. Canadian Wood Products Inc.
48. Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest
Products, Ltd./Canfor Wood Products
Marketing, Ltd.
49. Canusa cedar inc.
50. Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd.
51. Careau Bois inc.
52. Carrier & Begin Inc.
53. Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
54. Carrier Lumber Ltd.
55. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
56. Cedarline Industries, Ltd.
57. Central Cedar Ltd.
58. Centurion Lumber, Ltd.
59. Chaleur Sawmills LP
60. Channel-ex Trading Corporation
61. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
62. Clermond Hamel Lte´e
63. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
64. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
65. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
66. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd.
67. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
68. Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
69. CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed
70. CWP—Industriel inc.
71. CWP—Montre´al inc.
72. D & D Pallets, Ltd.
73. Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
74. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
75. Delco Forest Products Ltd.
76. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
77. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
78. DH Manufacturing Inc.
79. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
80. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
81. Downie Timber Ltd.
82. Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
83. EACOM Timber Corporation
84. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
85. Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
86. ER Probyn Export Ltd.
87. Eric Goguen & Sons Ltd.
88. Falcon Lumber Ltd.
89. Fontaine Inc
90. Foothills Forest Products Inc.
91. Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd.
92. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
93. Fraserview Cedar Products
94. Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
95. G & R Cedar Ltd.
96. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
97. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
98. Goat Lake Forest Products Ltd.
99. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
100. Golden Ears Shingle Ltd.
101. Goldwood Industries Ltd.
102. Goodfellow Inc.
103. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
104. Groupe Creˆte Chertsey
105. Groupe Creˆte division St-Faustin
106. Groupe Lebel inc.
107. Groupe Lignarex inc.
108. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
109. Haida Forest Products Ltd.
110. Harry Freeman & Son Ltd.
111. Hornepayne Lumber LP
112. Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
113. Imperial Shake Co. Ltd.
114. Independent Building Materials Dist.
115. Interfor Corporation
116. Island Cedar Products Ltd
117. Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
118. J&G Log Works Ltd.
119. J.D. Irving, Limited
120. J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
121. Jan Woodland (2001) inc.
122. Jhajj Lumber Corporation
123. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
124. Kan Wood, Ltd.
125. Kebois Lte´e/Ltd
126. Keystone Timber Ltd.
127. Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd.
128. Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
129. Langevin Forest Products Inc.
130. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
131. Ledwidge Lumber Co. Ltd.
132. Leisure Lumber Ltd.
133. Les Bois d’oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier
inc.
134. Les Bois Martek Lumber
135. Les Bois Traite´s M.G. Inc.
136. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd.
137. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lte´e
138. Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
139. Lignum Forest Products LLP
140. Linwood Homes Ltd.
141. Longlac Lumber Inc.
142. Lulumco inc.
143. Magnum Forest Products, Ltd.
144. Maibec inc.
145. Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
146. Marcel Lauzon Inc.
147. Marwood Ltd.
148. Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
149. Matsqui Management and Consulting
Services Ltd., dba Canadian Cedar
Roofing Depot
150. Metrie Canada Ltd.
151. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd.
152. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
153. Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
154. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
155. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
156. MP Atlantic Wood Ltd.
157. Multicedre Itee
158. Nakina Lumber Inc.
159. National Forest Products Ltd.
160. New Future Lumber Ltd.
161. Nicholson and Cates Ltd
162. Norsask Forest Products Limited
Partnership
163. North American Forest Products, Ltd.
(located in Abbotsford, British Columbia)
164. North American Forest Products Ltd.
(located in Saint-Quentin, New
Brunswick)
165. North Enderby Timber Ltd.
166. Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Codes
167. Olympic Industries ULC
168. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman
169. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code
170. Olympic Industries, Inc.
171. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
172. Pacific Pallet, Ltd.
173. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
174. Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
175. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
176. Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
177. Pine Ideas Ltd.
178. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd
179. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
180. Power Wood Corp.
181. Precision Cedar Products Corp.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7285
182. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora
Forest Products)
183. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris
184. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c.
185. Produits Matra Inc.
186. Promobois G.D.S. inc.
187. Rayonier A.M. Canada GP
188. Rembos Inc.
189. Rene Bernard Inc.
190. Resolute FP Canada Inc./Resolute Forest
Products Inc./Produits Forestiers
Mauricie
191. Richard Lutes Cedar Inc.
192. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
193. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee
194. S & K Cedar Products Ltd.
195. S&R Sawmills Ltd
196. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
197. San Industries Ltd.
198. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
199. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
200. Scierie St-Michel inc.
201. Scierie West Brome Inc.
202. Scotsburn Lumber Co. Ltd.
203. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
204. Serpentine Cedar Ltd.
205. Serpentine Cedar Roofing Ltd.
206. Sexton Lumber Co. Ltd.
207. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
208. Silvaris Corporation
209. Silver Creek Premium Products Ltd.
210. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
211. Skana Forest Products Ltd.
212. Skeena Sawmills Ltd
213. Sound Spars Enterprise Ltd.
214. South Beach Trading Inc.
215. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc
216. Spruceland Millworks Inc.
217. Surrey Cedar Ltd.
218. T.G. Wood Products, Ltd
219. Taan Forest Products
220. Taiga Building Products Ltd.
221. Tall Tree Lumber Company
222. Teal Cedar Products Ltd.
223. Tembec Inc.
224. Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
225. The Teal-Jones Group
226. The Wood Source Inc.
227. Tolko Industries Ltd./Tolko Marketing
and Sales Ltd./Gilbert Smith Forest
Products Ltd.
228. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
229. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
230. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
231. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
232. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
233. Usine Sartigan Inc.
234. Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC
235. Valley Cedar 2 ULC
236. Vancouver Island Shingle, Ltd.
237. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products
Ltd.
238. Visscher Lumber Inc
239. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
240. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
241. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
242. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
243. West Fraser Mills Ltd.
244. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
245. West Wind Hardwood Inc.
246. Western Forest Products Inc.
247. Western Lumber Sales Limited
248. Western Wood Preservers Ltd.
249. Weston Forest Products Inc.
250. Westrend Exteriors Inc.
251. Weyerhaeuser Co.
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
7286
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices
252. White River Forest Products L.P.
253. Winton Homes Ltd.
254. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
255. Woodstock Forest Products
256. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
257. Yarrow Wood Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2020–02471 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Michael Powell via email at
michael.powell@nist.gov; by telephone
301–975–0310; or by mail to National
Institute of Standards and Technology,
NCCoE; 9700 Great Seneca Highway,
Rockville, MD 20850. Additional details
about the Manufacturing sector program
are available at https://
www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/
Manufacturing.
Interested
parties must contact NIST to request a
letter of interest template to be
[Docket No. 200113–0014]
completed and submitted to NIST.
Letters of interest will be accepted on a
National Cybersecurity Center of
first come, first served basis. When the
Excellence (NCCoE) Protecting
use case has been completed, NIST will
Information and System Integrity in
post a notice on the NCCoE
Industrial Control System
Manufacturing sector program website
Environments for the Manufacturing
at https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/
Sector
use-cases/manufacturing/integrity-ics
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards
announcing the completion of the use
and Technology, Department of
case and informing the public that it
Commerce.
will no longer accept letters of interest
ACTION: Notice.
for this use case.
Background: The NCCoE, part of
SUMMARY: The National Institute of
NIST, is a public-private collaboration
Standards and Technology (NIST)
for accelerating the widespread
invites organizations to provide
adoption of integrated cybersecurity
products and technical expertise to
tools and technologies. The NCCoE
support and demonstrate security
brings together experts from industry,
platforms for Protecting Information and government, and academia under one
System Integrity in Industrial Control
roof to develop practical, interoperable
System Environments for the
cybersecurity approaches that address
Manufacturing sector. This notice is the the real-world needs of complex
initial step for the National
Information Technology (IT) systems.
Cybersecurity Center of Excellence
By accelerating dissemination and use
(NCCoE) in collaborating with
of these integrated tools and
technology companies to address
technologies for protecting IT assets, the
cybersecurity challenges identified
NCCoE will enhance trust in U.S. IT
under the Manufacturing sector
communications, data, and storage
program. Participation in the use case is systems; reduce risk for companies and
open to all interested organizations.
individuals using IT systems; and
DATES: Collaborative activities will
encourage development of innovative,
commence as soon as enough completed job-creating cybersecurity products and
and signed letters of interest have been
services.
returned to address all the necessary
Process: NIST is soliciting responses
components and capabilities, but no
from all sources of relevant security
earlier than March 9, 2020.
capabilities (see below) to enter into a
ADDRESSES: The NCCoE is located at
CRADA to provide products and
9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville,
technical expertise to support and
MD 20850. Letters of interest must be
demonstrate security platforms for the
submitted to Manufacturing_nccoe@
Protecting Information and System
nist.gov or via hardcopy to National
Integrity in Industrial Control System
Institute of Standards and Technology,
Environments project for the
NCCoE; 9700 Great Seneca Highway,
Manufacturing sector. The full use case
Rockville, MD 20850. Organizations
can be viewed at: https://
whose letters of interest are accepted in
www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/
accordance with the process set forth in manufacturing/integrity-ics.
Interested parties should contact NIST
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
using the information provided in the
of this notice will be asked to sign a
consortium Cooperative Research and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Development Agreement (CRADA) with section of this notice. NIST will then
NIST. An NCCoE consortium CRADA
provide each interested party with a
template can be found at: https://
letter of interest template, which the
www.nccoe.nist.gov/library/nccoeparty must complete, certify that it is
consortium-crada-example.
accurate, and submit to NIST. NIST will
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contact interested parties if there are
questions regarding the responsiveness
of the letters of interest to the use case
objective or requirements identified
below. NIST will select participants
who have submitted complete letters of
interest on a first come, first served
basis within each category of product
components or capabilities listed below
up to the number of participants in each
category necessary to carry out this use
case. However, there may be continuing
opportunity to participate even after
initial activity commences. Selected
participants will be required to enter
into a consortium CRADA with NIST
(for reference, see ADDRESSES section
above). NIST published a notice in the
Federal Register on October 19, 2012
(77 FR 64314) inviting U.S. companies
to enter into National Cybersecurity
Excellence Partnerships (NCEPs) in
furtherance of the NCCoE. For this
demonstration project, NCEP partners
will not be given priority for
participation.
In March 2016, NIST issued a similar
call for collaboration for a Securing
Manufacturing Industrial Control
Systems: Behavioral Anomaly Detection
use case which can be found here:
https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/
use-cases/manufacturing/integrity-ics.
This collaborative project was originally
intended to yield a NIST Cybersecurity
Practice Guide, but instead resulted in
the publication of NISTIR 8219,
Securing Manufacturing Industrial
Control Systems: Behavioral Anomaly
Detection, https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/
sites/default/files/library/mf-ics-nistir8219.pdf. NIST anticipates that the
collaborators who contributed to
development of NISTIR 8219 will also
participate in this use case.
Use Case Objective: The objectives of
this project are to provide a proposed
approach to prevent, mitigate, and
detect threats from cyber attacks or
insider threats within a Manufacturing
industrial control system (ICS)
environment, and demonstrate how the
commercially available technologies
deployed in this build provide
cybersecurity capabilities that
Manufacturing organizations can use to
secure their operational technology (OT)
systems.
A detailed description of the
Protecting Information and System
Integrity in Industrial Control System
Environments is available at: https://
www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/
manufacturing/integrity-ics.
Requirements: Each responding
organization’s letter of interest should
identify which security platform
component(s) or capability(ies) it is
offering. Letters of interest should not
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7282-7286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02471]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-122-857]
Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in
Part; 2017-2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada. The period of
review (POR) is June 30, 2017 through December 31, 2018. Commerce
preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this
review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable February 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jeff Pederson (Canfor), Stephen Bailey
(Resolute), and Thomas Martin (West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769, (202) 482-0193, and (202) 482-
3936, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 1, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
notice of initiation of an antidumping duty administrative review on
softwood lumber from Canada.\1\ On April 1, 2019, based on timely
requests for administrative reviews, Commerce initiated an AD
administrative review covering 1,224 companies.\2\ As discussed below,
we have rescinded on all but 257 companies. Thus, the review covers 257
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, including mandatory
respondents Canfor,\3\
[[Page 7283]]
Resolute,\4\ and West Fraser.\5\ The remaining companies were not
selected for individual examination and remain subject to this
administrative review. The POR is June 30, 2017 through December 31,
2018. On September 6, 2019, we extended the preliminary results until
January 31, 2020.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
12209 (April 1, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
\2\ Id.
\3\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have
treated Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and
Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a
single entity. See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review:
Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2017-2018,'' dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum), at 5.
\4\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have
treated Resolute Growth Canada Inc., Forest Products Mauricie LP,
Soci[eacute]t[eacute] en commandite Scierie Opitciwan, Resolute-LP
Engineered Wood Larouche Inc., Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime
Limited Partnership, and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively,
Resolute) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at
6.
\5\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have
treated West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning
Forest Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively,
West Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum
at 6-7.
\6\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review--2017-2018,'' dated September 6, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this review is softwood lumber from Canada.
For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
All requests for administrative review were timely withdrawn for
certain companies. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to certain
companies named in the Initiation Notice.\8\ For a list of the
remaining companies in this review, see Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Initiation Notice, 84 FR at 12209.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review
We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average
dumping margin exists for the period June 30, 2017 through December 31,
2018:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter/producer margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor 2.02
Wood Products Marketing Ltd............................
Resolute Growth Canada Inc./Forest Products Mauricie LP, 1.18
Soci[eacute]t[eacute] en commandite Scierie Opitciwan/
Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc./Resolute-LP
Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership/Resolute
FP Canada Inc..........................................
West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning 1.57
Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc....
All Others.............................................. 1.66
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rate for Companies Not Individually Examined
Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which
provides instructions for calculating the all-others margin in an
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when
calculating the all-others margin, Commerce will exclude any zero and
de minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly,
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based
entirely on facts available.
In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of
2.02 percent for Canfor, 1.18 percent for Resolute, and 1.57 percent
for West Fraser. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act,
Commerce assigned the weighted-average of these three calculated
weighted-average dumping margins, 1.66 percent, to the non-selected
companies in these preliminary results. The rate calculated for the
non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin which is
calculated based on the U.S. values of the three reviewed companies
with an affirmative antidumping duty margin.\9\ Accordingly, we have
applied a rate of 1.66 percent to the non-selected companies.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany,
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663
(September 1, 2010).
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected
Respondents,'' dated January 31, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the interested parties within five days after
public announcement of the preliminary results in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
Public Comment
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance not
later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless
Commerce alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after
the date for filing case briefs.\11\ Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this administrative
[[Page 7284]]
review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of
authorities.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general
filing requirements).
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully
in its entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days
after the date of publication of this notice.\13\ Requests should
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs. Commerce intends to issue the final results of
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after
the date of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless extended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rate
For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for those companies 15 days
after publication of this notice.
Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review.\14\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin
is above de minimis in the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific assessment rate based on the ratio of
the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined
sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1).\15\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping
margin or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis in
the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance
with the Final Modification for Reviews.\16\ The final results of this
administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for
future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. We intend to
issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
\15\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
\16\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8103; see also
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping
duties will be effective upon publication of the notice of final
results of this review for all shipments of softwood lumber from Canada
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be
equal to the dumping margin established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by companies not covered in this
review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published
for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered
in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recently completed segment for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other
producers or exporters will continue to be 6.58 percent, the all-others
rate established in the LTFV investigation.\17\ These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR
51806 (November 8, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: January 31, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates
V. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part
VI. Particular Market Situation Allegation
VII. Unexamined Respondents
VIII. Discussion of the Methodology
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II
Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Not Being Rescinded
1. 1074712 BC Ltd.
2. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
3. 752615 B.C Ltd, Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview
Cedar Products.
4. 9224-5737 Qu[eacute]bec inc. (aka, A.G. Bois)
5. A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc.
6. Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd.
7. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8. Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd.
9. Aler Forest Products, Ltd.
10. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
11. American Pacific Wood Products
12. Anbrook Industries Ltd.
13. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
14. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.
15. Anglo-American Cedar Products, LTD.
16. Antrim Cedar Corporation
17. Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd.
18. Arbec Lumber Inc.
19. Aspen Planers Ltd.
20. B&L Forest Products Ltd
21. B.B. Pallets Inc.
22. Babine Forest Products Limited
23. Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
24. Bardobec Inc.
25. Barrette-Chapais Ltee
26. BarretteWood Inc.
27. Beno[icirc]t & Dionne Produits Forestiers Lt[eacute]e
28. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
29. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
30. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
31. Bois Ais[eacute] de Montr[eacute]al inc.
32. Bois Bonsa[iuml] inc.
33. Bois D'oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka, Cedrico Lumber Inc.)
34. Bois Daaquam inc.
35. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc.
36. Boisaco
37. Boscus Canada Inc.
38. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.
[[Page 7285]]
39. BPWood Ltd.
40. Bramwood Forest Inc.
41. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
42. Busque & Laflamme Inc.
43. C&C Wood Products Ltd.
44. Caledonia Forest Products Inc.
45. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd.
46. Canadian American Forest Products Ltd.
47. Canadian Wood Products Inc.
48. Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products, Ltd./Canfor Wood
Products Marketing, Ltd.
49. Canusa cedar inc.
50. Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd.
51. Careau Bois inc.
52. Carrier & Begin Inc.
53. Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
54. Carrier Lumber Ltd.
55. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
56. Cedarline Industries, Ltd.
57. Central Cedar Ltd.
58. Centurion Lumber, Ltd.
59. Chaleur Sawmills LP
60. Channel-ex Trading Corporation
61. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
62. Clermond Hamel Lt[eacute]e
63. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
64. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
65. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
66. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd.
67. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
68. Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
69. CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed
70. CWP--Industriel inc.
71. CWP--Montr[eacute]al inc.
72. D & D Pallets, Ltd.
73. Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
74. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
75. Delco Forest Products Ltd.
76. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
77. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
78. DH Manufacturing Inc.
79. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
80. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
81. Downie Timber Ltd.
82. Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
83. EACOM Timber Corporation
84. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
85. Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
86. ER Probyn Export Ltd.
87. Eric Goguen & Sons Ltd.
88. Falcon Lumber Ltd.
89. Fontaine Inc
90. Foothills Forest Products Inc.
91. Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd.
92. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
93. Fraserview Cedar Products
94. Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
95. G & R Cedar Ltd.
96. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
97. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
98. Goat Lake Forest Products Ltd.
99. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
100. Golden Ears Shingle Ltd.
101. Goldwood Industries Ltd.
102. Goodfellow Inc.
103. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
104. Groupe Cr[ecirc]te Chertsey
105. Groupe Cr[ecirc]te division St-Faustin
106. Groupe Lebel inc.
107. Groupe Lignarex inc.
108. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
109. Haida Forest Products Ltd.
110. Harry Freeman & Son Ltd.
111. Hornepayne Lumber LP
112. Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd.
113. Imperial Shake Co. Ltd.
114. Independent Building Materials Dist.
115. Interfor Corporation
116. Island Cedar Products Ltd
117. Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
118. J&G Log Works Ltd.
119. J.D. Irving, Limited
120. J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
121. Jan Woodland (2001) inc.
122. Jhajj Lumber Corporation
123. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
124. Kan Wood, Ltd.
125. Kebois Lt[eacute]e/Ltd
126. Keystone Timber Ltd.
127. Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd.
128. Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
129. Langevin Forest Products Inc.
130. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
131. Ledwidge Lumber Co. Ltd.
132. Leisure Lumber Ltd.
133. Les Bois d'oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier inc.
134. Les Bois Martek Lumber
135. Les Bois Trait[eacute]s M.G. Inc.
136. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd.
137. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lt[eacute]e
138. Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
139. Lignum Forest Products LLP
140. Linwood Homes Ltd.
141. Longlac Lumber Inc.
142. Lulumco inc.
143. Magnum Forest Products, Ltd.
144. Maibec inc.
145. Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
146. Marcel Lauzon Inc.
147. Marwood Ltd.
148. Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
149. Matsqui Management and Consulting Services Ltd., dba Canadian
Cedar Roofing Depot
150. Metrie Canada Ltd.
151. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd.
152. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
153. Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
154. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
155. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
156. MP Atlantic Wood Ltd.
157. Multicedre Itee
158. Nakina Lumber Inc.
159. National Forest Products Ltd.
160. New Future Lumber Ltd.
161. Nicholson and Cates Ltd
162. Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership
163. North American Forest Products, Ltd. (located in Abbotsford,
British Columbia)
164. North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Saint-Quentin,
New Brunswick)
165. North Enderby Timber Ltd.
166. Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Codes
167. Olympic Industries ULC
168. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman
169. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code
170. Olympic Industries, Inc.
171. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
172. Pacific Pallet, Ltd.
173. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
174. Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
175. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
176. Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
177. Pine Ideas Ltd.
178. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd
179. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
180. Power Wood Corp.
181. Precision Cedar Products Corp.
182. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora Forest Products)
183. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris
184. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c.
185. Produits Matra Inc.
186. Promobois G.D.S. inc.
187. Rayonier A.M. Canada GP
188. Rembos Inc.
189. Rene Bernard Inc.
190. Resolute FP Canada Inc./Resolute Forest Products Inc./Produits
Forestiers Mauricie
191. Richard Lutes Cedar Inc.
192. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
193. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee
194. S & K Cedar Products Ltd.
195. S&R Sawmills Ltd
196. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
197. San Industries Ltd.
198. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
199. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
200. Scierie St[hyphen]Michel inc.
201. Scierie West Brome Inc.
202. Scotsburn Lumber Co. Ltd.
203. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
204. Serpentine Cedar Ltd.
205. Serpentine Cedar Roofing Ltd.
206. Sexton Lumber Co. Ltd.
207. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
208. Silvaris Corporation
209. Silver Creek Premium Products Ltd.
210. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
211. Skana Forest Products Ltd.
212. Skeena Sawmills Ltd
213. Sound Spars Enterprise Ltd.
214. South Beach Trading Inc.
215. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc
216. Spruceland Millworks Inc.
217. Surrey Cedar Ltd.
218. T.G. Wood Products, Ltd
219. Taan Forest Products
220. Taiga Building Products Ltd.
221. Tall Tree Lumber Company
222. Teal Cedar Products Ltd.
223. Tembec Inc.
224. Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
225. The Teal-Jones Group
226. The Wood Source Inc.
227. Tolko Industries Ltd./Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd./Gilbert
Smith Forest Products Ltd.
228. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
229. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
230. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
231. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
232. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
233. Usine Sartigan Inc.
234. Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC
235. Valley Cedar 2 ULC
236. Vancouver Island Shingle, Ltd.
237. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd.
238. Visscher Lumber Inc
239. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
240. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
241. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
242. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
243. West Fraser Mills Ltd.
244. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
245. West Wind Hardwood Inc.
246. Western Forest Products Inc.
247. Western Lumber Sales Limited
248. Western Wood Preservers Ltd.
249. Weston Forest Products Inc.
250. Westrend Exteriors Inc.
251. Weyerhaeuser Co.
[[Page 7286]]
252. White River Forest Products L.P.
253. Winton Homes Ltd.
254. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
255. Woodstock Forest Products
256. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
257. Yarrow Wood Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2020-02471 Filed 2-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
