Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017-2018, 7282-7286 [2020-02471]

Download as PDF jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 7282 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices diversity of the supply chain sector, including with regard to geographic location and company size. Members of the Committee shall represent companies, organizations, and stakeholders involved in the U.S. supply chain, with at least one individual representing each of the following: Supply chain firms or their associations; users of supply chains (e.g., retailers, distributors, manufacturers or other sectors); freight transportation providers; ports; and academia. Based on the balance of viewpoints currently represented on the Committee, representatives from the trucking, air transport, energy, logistics, supply chain financing, warehousing, terminal operators, retailers, and supply chain compliance sectors are encouraged to apply. Other than the experts from academia, all members shall serve in a representative capacity, expressing the views and interests of a U.S. company or U.S. organization, as well as its particular sector. Members serving in such a representative capacity are not Special Government Employees. The members from academia serve as experts and therefore are Special Government Employees (SGEs) and shall be subject to the ethical standards applicable to SGEs. Members who serve as SGEs must certify that they are not Federally registered lobbyists. Each member of the Committee must be a U.S. citizen and not registered as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act. All appointments are made without regard to political affiliation. Self-nominations will be accepted. Members of the Committee will not be compensated for their services or reimbursed for their travel expenses. The Committee shall meet approximately quarterly, or as determined by the DFO. Members shall serve at the pleasure of the Secretary. All nominations for membership on the Committee should provide the following information: (1) Name, title, and relevant contact information (including phone, fax, and email address) of the individual requesting consideration; and (2) An affirmative statement that the applicant is not required to register as a foreign agent under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938. In addition to the above requirements for all nominations, nominations for representatives of companies, organizations, and stakeholders involved in the U.S. supply chain, including supply chain firms or their associations; users of supply chains VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Feb 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 (e.g., retailers, distributors, manufacturers, or other sectors); freight transportation providers; and ports, should also provide the following information: (1) A sponsor letter on the letterhead of the sponsoring U.S. company or U.S. organization to be represented, containing a brief description why the nominee should be considered for membership; (2) Short biography of nominee including credentials; (3) Brief description of the U.S. company or U.S. organization to be represented and its activities and size (number of employees or members and annual sales, if applicable); and (4) An affirmative statement that the applicant meets all Committee eligibility requirements for representative members, including that the applicant represents a U.S. company or U.S. organization. a. For purposes of Committee eligibility, a U.S. company is at least 51 percent owned by U.S. persons. b. For purposes of Committee eligibility, a U.S. organization is controlled by U.S. persons, as determined based on its board of directors (or comparable governing body), membership, and funding sources, as applicable. In addition to the above requirements for all nominations, nominations for experts from academia should also provide the following information: (1) A description of the nominee’s area(s) of expertise; (2) A concise Curriculum Vitae (CV) or resume that covers education, experience, and relevant publications and summarizes how this expertise addresses supply chain competitiveness; (3) An affirmative statement that the applicant meets all Committee eligibility requirements. Please do not send company or organization brochures. Nominations may be emailed to richard.boll@trade.gov, faxed to the attention of Richard Boll at 202–482– 2669, or mailed to Richard Boll, Office of Supply Chain, Professional & Business Services, Room 11004, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, and must be received on or before February 28, 2020. Nominees selected for appointment to the Committee will be notified. Dated: February 4, 2020. Maureen Smith, Director, Office of Supply Chain and Professional & Business Services. [FR Doc. 2020–02455 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–857] Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada. The period of review (POR) is June 30, 2017 through December 31, 2018. Commerce preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Applicable February 7, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jeff Pederson (Canfor), Stephen Bailey (Resolute), and Thomas Martin (West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2769, (202) 482–0193, and (202) 482–3936, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On April 1, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of an antidumping duty administrative review on softwood lumber from Canada.1 On April 1, 2019, based on timely requests for administrative reviews, Commerce initiated an AD administrative review covering 1,224 companies.2 As discussed below, we have rescinded on all but 257 companies. Thus, the review covers 257 producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, including mandatory respondents Canfor,3 1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 12209 (April 1, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 2 Id. 3 As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have treated Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a single entity. See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2017– E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM 07FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices Resolute,4 and West Fraser.5 The remaining companies were not selected for individual examination and remain subject to this administrative review. The POR is June 30, 2017 through December 31, 2018. On September 6, 2019, we extended the preliminary results until January 31, 2020.6 Scope of the Order The product covered by this review is softwood lumber from Canada. For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.7 Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review. All requests for administrative review were timely withdrawn for certain companies. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to certain companies named in the Initiation Notice.8 For a list of the remaining companies in this review, see Appendix II. Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period June 30, 2017 through December 31, 2018: Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review Weightedaverage margin (percent) Exporter/producer Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd ............................................................... Resolute Growth Canada Inc./Forest Products Mauricie LP, Socie´te´ en commandite Scierie Opitciwan/Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc./Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership/Resolute FP Canada Inc ............................. West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc ............................ All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Rate for Companies Not Individually Examined jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the allothers margin in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when calculating the all-others margin, Commerce will exclude any zero and de minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice has been to average the margins for selected respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available. 2018,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), at 5. 4 As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have treated Resolute Growth Canada Inc., Forest Products Mauricie LP, Socie´te´ en commandite Scierie Opitciwan, Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc., Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership, and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively, Resolute) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Feb 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 7283 In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 2.02 percent for Canfor, 1.18 percent for Resolute, and 1.57 percent for West Fraser. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce assigned the weighted-average of these three calculated weighted-average dumping margins, 1.66 percent, to the non-selected companies in these preliminary results. The rate calculated for the non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin which is calculated based on the U.S. values of the three reviewed companies with an affirmative antidumping duty margin.9 Accordingly, we have applied a rate of 1.66 percent to the non-selected companies.10 5 As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have treated West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, West Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6–7. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review—2017–2018,’’ dated September 6, 2019. 7 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3–5. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2.02 1.18 1.57 1.66 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the interested parties within five days after public announcement of the preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless Commerce alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.11 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this administrative 8 See Initiation Notice, 84 FR at 12209. Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). 10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected Respondents,’’ dated January 31, 2020. 11 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 9 See E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM 07FEN1 7284 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.12 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.13 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless extended. Assessment Rate For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for those companies 15 days after publication of this notice. Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.14 If a respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is above de minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).15 If a respondent’s 12 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 19 CFR 351.310(c). 14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 15 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 13 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Feb 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 weighted-average dumping margin or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.16 The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping duties will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this review for all shipments of softwood lumber from Canada entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be equal to the dumping margin established in the final results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by companies not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 6.58 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.17 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s 16 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8103; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 17 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 51806 (November 8, 2017). PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). Dated: January 31, 2020. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates V. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part VI. Particular Market Situation Allegation VII. Unexamined Respondents VIII. Discussion of the Methodology IX. Recommendation Appendix II Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Not Being Rescinded 1. 1074712 BC Ltd. 2. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd. 3. 752615 B.C Ltd, Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview Cedar Products. 4. 9224–5737 Que´bec inc. (aka, A.G. Bois) 5. A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc. 6. Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd. 7. AJ Forest Products Ltd. 8. Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd. 9. Aler Forest Products, Ltd. 10. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc. 11. American Pacific Wood Products 12. Anbrook Industries Ltd. 13. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd. 14. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd. 15. Anglo-American Cedar Products, LTD. 16. Antrim Cedar Corporation 17. Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd. 18. Arbec Lumber Inc. 19. Aspen Planers Ltd. 20. B&L Forest Products Ltd 21. B.B. Pallets Inc. 22. Babine Forest Products Limited 23. Bakerview Forest Products Inc. 24. Bardobec Inc. 25. Barrette-Chapais Ltee 26. BarretteWood Inc. 27. Benoıˆt & Dionne Produits Forestiers Lte´e 28. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd. 29. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc. 30. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc. 31. Bois Aise´ de Montre´al inc. 32. Bois Bonsaı¨ inc. 33. Bois D’oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka, Cedrico Lumber Inc.) 34. Bois Daaquam inc. 35. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc. 36. Boisaco 37. Boscus Canada Inc. 38. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd. E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM 07FEN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices 39. BPWood Ltd. 40. Bramwood Forest Inc. 41. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc. 42. Busque & Laflamme Inc. 43. C&C Wood Products Ltd. 44. Caledonia Forest Products Inc. 45. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd. 46. Canadian American Forest Products Ltd. 47. Canadian Wood Products Inc. 48. Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products, Ltd./Canfor Wood Products Marketing, Ltd. 49. Canusa cedar inc. 50. Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd. 51. Careau Bois inc. 52. Carrier & Begin Inc. 53. Carrier Forest Products Ltd. 54. Carrier Lumber Ltd. 55. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd. 56. Cedarline Industries, Ltd. 57. Central Cedar Ltd. 58. Centurion Lumber, Ltd. 59. Chaleur Sawmills LP 60. Channel-ex Trading Corporation 61. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd. 62. Clermond Hamel Lte´e 63. Coast Clear Wood Ltd. 64. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd. 65. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. 66. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd. 67. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc. 68. Cowichan Lumber Ltd. 69. CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed 70. CWP—Industriel inc. 71. CWP—Montre´al inc. 72. D & D Pallets, Ltd. 73. Dakeryn Industries Ltd. 74. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd. 75. Delco Forest Products Ltd. 76. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd. 77. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd. 78. DH Manufacturing Inc. 79. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd. 80. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd. 81. Downie Timber Ltd. 82. Dunkley Lumber Ltd. 83. EACOM Timber Corporation 84. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd. 85. Edgewood Forest Products Inc. 86. ER Probyn Export Ltd. 87. Eric Goguen & Sons Ltd. 88. Falcon Lumber Ltd. 89. Fontaine Inc 90. Foothills Forest Products Inc. 91. Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd. 92. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd. 93. Fraserview Cedar Products 94. Furtado Forest Products Ltd. 95. G & R Cedar Ltd. 96. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd. 97. Glandell Enterprises Inc. 98. Goat Lake Forest Products Ltd. 99. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd. 100. Golden Ears Shingle Ltd. 101. Goldwood Industries Ltd. 102. Goodfellow Inc. 103. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd. 104. Groupe Creˆte Chertsey 105. Groupe Creˆte division St-Faustin 106. Groupe Lebel inc. 107. Groupe Lignarex inc. 108. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd. 109. Haida Forest Products Ltd. 110. Harry Freeman & Son Ltd. 111. Hornepayne Lumber LP 112. Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Feb 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 113. Imperial Shake Co. Ltd. 114. Independent Building Materials Dist. 115. Interfor Corporation 116. Island Cedar Products Ltd 117. Ivor Forest Products Ltd. 118. J&G Log Works Ltd. 119. J.D. Irving, Limited 120. J.H. Huscroft Ltd. 121. Jan Woodland (2001) inc. 122. Jhajj Lumber Corporation 123. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd. 124. Kan Wood, Ltd. 125. Kebois Lte´e/Ltd 126. Keystone Timber Ltd. 127. Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd. 128. Lafontaine Lumber Inc. 129. Langevin Forest Products Inc. 130. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited 131. Ledwidge Lumber Co. Ltd. 132. Leisure Lumber Ltd. 133. Les Bois d’oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier inc. 134. Les Bois Martek Lumber 135. Les Bois Traite´s M.G. Inc. 136. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd. 137. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lte´e 138. Leslie Forest Products Ltd. 139. Lignum Forest Products LLP 140. Linwood Homes Ltd. 141. Longlac Lumber Inc. 142. Lulumco inc. 143. Magnum Forest Products, Ltd. 144. Maibec inc. 145. Manitou Forest Products Ltd. 146. Marcel Lauzon Inc. 147. Marwood Ltd. 148. Materiaux Blanchet Inc. 149. Matsqui Management and Consulting Services Ltd., dba Canadian Cedar Roofing Depot 150. Metrie Canada Ltd. 151. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd. 152. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd. 153. Mill & Timber Products Ltd. 154. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. 155. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc. 156. MP Atlantic Wood Ltd. 157. Multicedre Itee 158. Nakina Lumber Inc. 159. National Forest Products Ltd. 160. New Future Lumber Ltd. 161. Nicholson and Cates Ltd 162. Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership 163. North American Forest Products, Ltd. (located in Abbotsford, British Columbia) 164. North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Saint-Quentin, New Brunswick) 165. North Enderby Timber Ltd. 166. Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Codes 167. Olympic Industries ULC 168. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman 169. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code 170. Olympic Industries, Inc. 171. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd. 172. Pacific Pallet, Ltd. 173. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd. 174. Parallel Wood Products Ltd. 175. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation 176. Phoenix Forest Products Inc. 177. Pine Ideas Ltd. 178. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd 179. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. 180. Power Wood Corp. 181. Precision Cedar Products Corp. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7285 182. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora Forest Products) 183. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris 184. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. 185. Produits Matra Inc. 186. Promobois G.D.S. inc. 187. Rayonier A.M. Canada GP 188. Rembos Inc. 189. Rene Bernard Inc. 190. Resolute FP Canada Inc./Resolute Forest Products Inc./Produits Forestiers Mauricie 191. Richard Lutes Cedar Inc. 192. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. 193. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee 194. S & K Cedar Products Ltd. 195. S&R Sawmills Ltd 196. S&W Forest Products Ltd. 197. San Industries Ltd. 198. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. 199. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. 200. Scierie St-Michel inc. 201. Scierie West Brome Inc. 202. Scotsburn Lumber Co. Ltd. 203. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc. 204. Serpentine Cedar Ltd. 205. Serpentine Cedar Roofing Ltd. 206. Sexton Lumber Co. Ltd. 207. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. 208. Silvaris Corporation 209. Silver Creek Premium Products Ltd. 210. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. 211. Skana Forest Products Ltd. 212. Skeena Sawmills Ltd 213. Sound Spars Enterprise Ltd. 214. South Beach Trading Inc. 215. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc 216. Spruceland Millworks Inc. 217. Surrey Cedar Ltd. 218. T.G. Wood Products, Ltd 219. Taan Forest Products 220. Taiga Building Products Ltd. 221. Tall Tree Lumber Company 222. Teal Cedar Products Ltd. 223. Tembec Inc. 224. Terminal Forest Products Ltd. 225. The Teal-Jones Group 226. The Wood Source Inc. 227. Tolko Industries Ltd./Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd./Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd. 228. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. 229. Triad Forest Products Ltd. 230. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 231. Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 232. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd. 233. Usine Sartigan Inc. 234. Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC 235. Valley Cedar 2 ULC 236. Vancouver Island Shingle, Ltd. 237. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. 238. Visscher Lumber Inc 239. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 240. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 241. Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 242. West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 243. West Fraser Mills Ltd. 244. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. 245. West Wind Hardwood Inc. 246. Western Forest Products Inc. 247. Western Lumber Sales Limited 248. Western Wood Preservers Ltd. 249. Weston Forest Products Inc. 250. Westrend Exteriors Inc. 251. Weyerhaeuser Co. E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM 07FEN1 7286 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Notices 252. White River Forest Products L.P. 253. Winton Homes Ltd. 254. Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 255. Woodstock Forest Products 256. Woodtone Specialties Inc. 257. Yarrow Wood Ltd. [FR Doc. 2020–02471 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Michael Powell via email at michael.powell@nist.gov; by telephone 301–975–0310; or by mail to National Institute of Standards and Technology, NCCoE; 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville, MD 20850. Additional details about the Manufacturing sector program are available at https:// www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/ Manufacturing. Interested parties must contact NIST to request a letter of interest template to be [Docket No. 200113–0014] completed and submitted to NIST. Letters of interest will be accepted on a National Cybersecurity Center of first come, first served basis. When the Excellence (NCCoE) Protecting use case has been completed, NIST will Information and System Integrity in post a notice on the NCCoE Industrial Control System Manufacturing sector program website Environments for the Manufacturing at https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/ Sector use-cases/manufacturing/integrity-ics AGENCY: National Institute of Standards announcing the completion of the use and Technology, Department of case and informing the public that it Commerce. will no longer accept letters of interest ACTION: Notice. for this use case. Background: The NCCoE, part of SUMMARY: The National Institute of NIST, is a public-private collaboration Standards and Technology (NIST) for accelerating the widespread invites organizations to provide adoption of integrated cybersecurity products and technical expertise to tools and technologies. The NCCoE support and demonstrate security brings together experts from industry, platforms for Protecting Information and government, and academia under one System Integrity in Industrial Control roof to develop practical, interoperable System Environments for the cybersecurity approaches that address Manufacturing sector. This notice is the the real-world needs of complex initial step for the National Information Technology (IT) systems. Cybersecurity Center of Excellence By accelerating dissemination and use (NCCoE) in collaborating with of these integrated tools and technology companies to address technologies for protecting IT assets, the cybersecurity challenges identified NCCoE will enhance trust in U.S. IT under the Manufacturing sector communications, data, and storage program. Participation in the use case is systems; reduce risk for companies and open to all interested organizations. individuals using IT systems; and DATES: Collaborative activities will encourage development of innovative, commence as soon as enough completed job-creating cybersecurity products and and signed letters of interest have been services. returned to address all the necessary Process: NIST is soliciting responses components and capabilities, but no from all sources of relevant security earlier than March 9, 2020. capabilities (see below) to enter into a ADDRESSES: The NCCoE is located at CRADA to provide products and 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Rockville, technical expertise to support and MD 20850. Letters of interest must be demonstrate security platforms for the submitted to Manufacturing_nccoe@ Protecting Information and System nist.gov or via hardcopy to National Integrity in Industrial Control System Institute of Standards and Technology, Environments project for the NCCoE; 9700 Great Seneca Highway, Manufacturing sector. The full use case Rockville, MD 20850. Organizations can be viewed at: https:// whose letters of interest are accepted in www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/ accordance with the process set forth in manufacturing/integrity-ics. Interested parties should contact NIST the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section using the information provided in the of this notice will be asked to sign a consortium Cooperative Research and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Development Agreement (CRADA) with section of this notice. NIST will then NIST. An NCCoE consortium CRADA provide each interested party with a template can be found at: https:// letter of interest template, which the www.nccoe.nist.gov/library/nccoeparty must complete, certify that it is consortium-crada-example. accurate, and submit to NIST. NIST will National Institute of Standards and Technology jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:42 Feb 06, 2020 Jkt 250001 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 contact interested parties if there are questions regarding the responsiveness of the letters of interest to the use case objective or requirements identified below. NIST will select participants who have submitted complete letters of interest on a first come, first served basis within each category of product components or capabilities listed below up to the number of participants in each category necessary to carry out this use case. However, there may be continuing opportunity to participate even after initial activity commences. Selected participants will be required to enter into a consortium CRADA with NIST (for reference, see ADDRESSES section above). NIST published a notice in the Federal Register on October 19, 2012 (77 FR 64314) inviting U.S. companies to enter into National Cybersecurity Excellence Partnerships (NCEPs) in furtherance of the NCCoE. For this demonstration project, NCEP partners will not be given priority for participation. In March 2016, NIST issued a similar call for collaboration for a Securing Manufacturing Industrial Control Systems: Behavioral Anomaly Detection use case which can be found here: https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/ use-cases/manufacturing/integrity-ics. This collaborative project was originally intended to yield a NIST Cybersecurity Practice Guide, but instead resulted in the publication of NISTIR 8219, Securing Manufacturing Industrial Control Systems: Behavioral Anomaly Detection, https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/ sites/default/files/library/mf-ics-nistir8219.pdf. NIST anticipates that the collaborators who contributed to development of NISTIR 8219 will also participate in this use case. Use Case Objective: The objectives of this project are to provide a proposed approach to prevent, mitigate, and detect threats from cyber attacks or insider threats within a Manufacturing industrial control system (ICS) environment, and demonstrate how the commercially available technologies deployed in this build provide cybersecurity capabilities that Manufacturing organizations can use to secure their operational technology (OT) systems. A detailed description of the Protecting Information and System Integrity in Industrial Control System Environments is available at: https:// www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/use-cases/ manufacturing/integrity-ics. Requirements: Each responding organization’s letter of interest should identify which security platform component(s) or capability(ies) it is offering. Letters of interest should not E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM 07FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7282-7286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-857]


Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review, in 
Part; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 
softwood lumber products (softwood lumber) from Canada. The period of 
review (POR) is June 30, 2017 through December 31, 2018. Commerce 
preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this 
review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We 
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable February 7, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Jeff Pederson (Canfor), Stephen Bailey 
(Resolute), and Thomas Martin (West Fraser), AD/CVD Operations, Office 
IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2769, (202) 482-0193, and (202) 482-
3936, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On April 1, 2019, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
notice of initiation of an antidumping duty administrative review on 
softwood lumber from Canada.\1\ On April 1, 2019, based on timely 
requests for administrative reviews, Commerce initiated an AD 
administrative review covering 1,224 companies.\2\ As discussed below, 
we have rescinded on all but 257 companies. Thus, the review covers 257 
producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, including mandatory 
respondents Canfor,\3\

[[Page 7283]]

Resolute,\4\ and West Fraser.\5\ The remaining companies were not 
selected for individual examination and remain subject to this 
administrative review. The POR is June 30, 2017 through December 31, 
2018. On September 6, 2019, we extended the preliminary results until 
January 31, 2020.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Initiation 
of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 
12209 (April 1, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
    \2\ Id.
    \3\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have 
treated Canfor Corporation, Canadian Forest Products Ltd., and 
Canfor Wood Products Marketing Ltd. (collectively, Canfor) as a 
single entity. See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: 
Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada; 2017-2018,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum), at 5.
    \4\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have 
treated Resolute Growth Canada Inc., Forest Products Mauricie LP, 
Soci[eacute]t[eacute] en commandite Scierie Opitciwan, Resolute-LP 
Engineered Wood Larouche Inc., Resolute-LP Engineered Wood St-Prime 
Limited Partnership, and Resolute FP Canada Inc. (collectively, 
Resolute) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 
6.
    \5\ As described in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, we have 
treated West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning 
Forest Products Ltd., and Sundre Forest Products Inc. (collectively, 
West Fraser) as a single entity. See Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
at 6-7.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 
Canada: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review--2017-2018,'' dated September 6, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this review is softwood lumber from Canada. 
For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 3-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a 
full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of the topics included in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this 
notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is 
made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at 
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions 
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Rescission of Administrative Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties 
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the 
publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review. 
All requests for administrative review were timely withdrawn for 
certain companies. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 
we are rescinding this administrative review with respect to certain 
companies named in the Initiation Notice.\8\ For a list of the 
remaining companies in this review, see Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Initiation Notice, 84 FR at 12209.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margin exists for the period June 30, 2017 through December 31, 
2018:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                    Exporter/producer                         margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products Ltd./Canfor             2.02
 Wood Products Marketing Ltd............................
Resolute Growth Canada Inc./Forest Products Mauricie LP,            1.18
 Soci[eacute]t[eacute] en commandite Scierie Opitciwan/
 Resolute-LP Engineered Wood Larouche Inc./Resolute-LP
 Engineered Wood St-Prime Limited Partnership/Resolute
 FP Canada Inc..........................................
West Fraser Mills Ltd., Blue Ridge Lumber Inc./Manning              1.57
 Forest Products Ltd./and Sundre Forest Products Inc....
All Others..............................................            1.66
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Companies Not Individually Examined

    Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents, 
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others margin in an 
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when 
calculating the all-others margin, Commerce will exclude any zero and 
de minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly, 
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected 
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based 
entirely on facts available.
    In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 
2.02 percent for Canfor, 1.18 percent for Resolute, and 1.57 percent 
for West Fraser. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 
Commerce assigned the weighted-average of these three calculated 
weighted-average dumping margins, 1.66 percent, to the non-selected 
companies in these preliminary results. The rate calculated for the 
non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin which is 
calculated based on the U.S. values of the three reviewed companies 
with an affirmative antidumping duty margin.\9\ Accordingly, we have 
applied a rate of 1.66 percent to the non-selected companies.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, 
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 
(September 1, 2010).
    \10\ See Memorandum, ``Calculation of the Rate for Non-Selected 
Respondents,'' dated January 31, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these 
preliminary results to the interested parties within five days after 
public announcement of the preliminary results in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.224(b).

Public Comment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance not 
later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless 
Commerce alters the time limit. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 
raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after 
the date for filing case briefs.\11\ Parties who submit case briefs or 
rebuttal briefs in this administrative

[[Page 7284]]

review are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of 
the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of 
authorities.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for general 
filing requirements).
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully 
in its entirety via ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice.\13\ Requests should 
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the 
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the 
respective case briefs. Commerce intends to issue the final results of 
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of 
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after 
the date of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal 
Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, unless extended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rate

    For the companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping 
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of 
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for those companies 15 days 
after publication of this notice.
    Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and 
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered 
by this review.\14\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin 
is above de minimis in the final results of this review, we will 
calculate an importer-specific assessment rate based on the ratio of 
the total amount of dumping calculated for each importer's examined 
sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.212(b)(1).\15\ If a respondent's weighted-average dumping 
margin or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis in 
the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 
appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance 
with the Final Modification for Reviews.\16\ The final results of this 
administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of 
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for 
future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. We intend to 
issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the 
final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    \15\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 
Reviews).
    \16\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8103; see also 
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements for estimated antidumping 
duties will be effective upon publication of the notice of final 
results of this review for all shipments of softwood lumber from Canada 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 
The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be 
equal to the dumping margin established in the final results of the 
review; (2) for merchandise exported by companies not covered in this 
review but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered 
in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate established for the most recently completed segment for the 
producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 6.58 percent, the all-others 
rate established in the LTFV investigation.\17\ These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada: Final 
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Affirmative Final Determination of Critical Circumstances, 82 FR 
51806 (November 8, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this period of review. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    Commerce is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: January 31, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing of Affiliates
V. Rescission of Administrative Review, In Part
VI. Particular Market Situation Allegation
VII. Unexamined Respondents
VIII. Discussion of the Methodology
IX. Recommendation

Appendix II

Companies for Which This Administrative Review Is Not Being Rescinded

1. 1074712 BC Ltd.
2. 5214875 Manitoba Ltd.
3. 752615 B.C Ltd, Fraserview Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview 
Cedar Products.
4. 9224-5737 Qu[eacute]bec inc. (aka, A.G. Bois)
5. A.B. Cedar Shingle Inc.
6. Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd.
7. AJ Forest Products Ltd.
8. Alberta Spruce Industries Ltd.
9. Aler Forest Products, Ltd.
10. Alpa Lumber Mills Inc.
11. American Pacific Wood Products
12. Anbrook Industries Ltd.
13. Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd.
14. Anglo American Cedar Products Ltd.
15. Anglo-American Cedar Products, LTD.
16. Antrim Cedar Corporation
17. Aquila Cedar Products, Ltd.
18. Arbec Lumber Inc.
19. Aspen Planers Ltd.
20. B&L Forest Products Ltd
21. B.B. Pallets Inc.
22. Babine Forest Products Limited
23. Bakerview Forest Products Inc.
24. Bardobec Inc.
25. Barrette-Chapais Ltee
26. BarretteWood Inc.
27. Beno[icirc]t & Dionne Produits Forestiers Lt[eacute]e
28. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd.
29. Blanchet Multi Concept Inc.
30. Blanchette & Blanchette Inc.
31. Bois Ais[eacute] de Montr[eacute]al inc.
32. Bois Bonsa[iuml] inc.
33. Bois D'oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka, Cedrico Lumber Inc.)
34. Bois Daaquam inc.
35. Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc.
36. Boisaco
37. Boscus Canada Inc.
38. Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd.

[[Page 7285]]

39. BPWood Ltd.
40. Bramwood Forest Inc.
41. Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc.
42. Busque & Laflamme Inc.
43. C&C Wood Products Ltd.
44. Caledonia Forest Products Inc.
45. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd.
46. Canadian American Forest Products Ltd.
47. Canadian Wood Products Inc.
48. Canfor Corporation/Canadian Forest Products, Ltd./Canfor Wood 
Products Marketing, Ltd.
49. Canusa cedar inc.
50. Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd.
51. Careau Bois inc.
52. Carrier & Begin Inc.
53. Carrier Forest Products Ltd.
54. Carrier Lumber Ltd.
55. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd.
56. Cedarline Industries, Ltd.
57. Central Cedar Ltd.
58. Centurion Lumber, Ltd.
59. Chaleur Sawmills LP
60. Channel-ex Trading Corporation
61. Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd.
62. Clermond Hamel Lt[eacute]e
63. Coast Clear Wood Ltd.
64. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd.
65. Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd.
66. Comox Valley Shakes Ltd.
67. Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc.
68. Cowichan Lumber Ltd.
69. CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed
70. CWP--Industriel inc.
71. CWP--Montr[eacute]al inc.
72. D & D Pallets, Ltd.
73. Dakeryn Industries Ltd.
74. Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd.
75. Delco Forest Products Ltd.
76. Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd.
77. Devon Lumber Co. Ltd.
78. DH Manufacturing Inc.
79. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd.
80. Doubletree Forest Products Ltd.
81. Downie Timber Ltd.
82. Dunkley Lumber Ltd.
83. EACOM Timber Corporation
84. East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd.
85. Edgewood Forest Products Inc.
86. ER Probyn Export Ltd.
87. Eric Goguen & Sons Ltd.
88. Falcon Lumber Ltd.
89. Fontaine Inc
90. Foothills Forest Products Inc.
91. Fornebu Lumber Co. Ltd.
92. Fraser Specialty Products Ltd.
93. Fraserview Cedar Products
94. Furtado Forest Products Ltd.
95. G & R Cedar Ltd.
96. Galloway Lumber Company Ltd.
97. Glandell Enterprises Inc.
98. Goat Lake Forest Products Ltd.
99. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd.
100. Golden Ears Shingle Ltd.
101. Goldwood Industries Ltd.
102. Goodfellow Inc.
103. Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd.
104. Groupe Cr[ecirc]te Chertsey
105. Groupe Cr[ecirc]te division St-Faustin
106. Groupe Lebel inc.
107. Groupe Lignarex inc.
108. H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd.
109. Haida Forest Products Ltd.
110. Harry Freeman & Son Ltd.
111. Hornepayne Lumber LP
112. Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd.
113. Imperial Shake Co. Ltd.
114. Independent Building Materials Dist.
115. Interfor Corporation
116. Island Cedar Products Ltd
117. Ivor Forest Products Ltd.
118. J&G Log Works Ltd.
119. J.D. Irving, Limited
120. J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
121. Jan Woodland (2001) inc.
122. Jhajj Lumber Corporation
123. Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd.
124. Kan Wood, Ltd.
125. Kebois Lt[eacute]e/Ltd
126. Keystone Timber Ltd.
127. Kootenay Innovative Wood Ltd.
128. Lafontaine Lumber Inc.
129. Langevin Forest Products Inc.
130. Lecours Lumber Co. Limited
131. Ledwidge Lumber Co. Ltd.
132. Leisure Lumber Ltd.
133. Les Bois d'oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier inc.
134. Les Bois Martek Lumber
135. Les Bois Trait[eacute]s M.G. Inc.
136. Les Chantiers de Chibougamau ltd.
137. Les Produits Forestiers D&G Lt[eacute]e
138. Leslie Forest Products Ltd.
139. Lignum Forest Products LLP
140. Linwood Homes Ltd.
141. Longlac Lumber Inc.
142. Lulumco inc.
143. Magnum Forest Products, Ltd.
144. Maibec inc.
145. Manitou Forest Products Ltd.
146. Marcel Lauzon Inc.
147. Marwood Ltd.
148. Materiaux Blanchet Inc.
149. Matsqui Management and Consulting Services Ltd., dba Canadian 
Cedar Roofing Depot
150. Metrie Canada Ltd.
151. Mid Valley Lumber Specialties, Ltd.
152. Midway Lumber Mills Ltd.
153. Mill & Timber Products Ltd.
154. Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.
155. Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.
156. MP Atlantic Wood Ltd.
157. Multicedre Itee
158. Nakina Lumber Inc.
159. National Forest Products Ltd.
160. New Future Lumber Ltd.
161. Nicholson and Cates Ltd
162. Norsask Forest Products Limited Partnership
163. North American Forest Products, Ltd. (located in Abbotsford, 
British Columbia)
164. North American Forest Products Ltd. (located in Saint-Quentin, 
New Brunswick)
165. North Enderby Timber Ltd.
166. Olympic Industries Inc-Reman Codes
167. Olympic Industries ULC
168. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman
169. Olympic Industries ULC-Reman Code
170. Olympic Industries, Inc.
171. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd.
172. Pacific Pallet, Ltd.
173. Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd.
174. Parallel Wood Products Ltd.
175. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation
176. Phoenix Forest Products Inc.
177. Pine Ideas Ltd.
178. Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd
179. Porcupine Wood Products Ltd.
180. Power Wood Corp.
181. Precision Cedar Products Corp.
182. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka, Kenora Forest Products)
183. Produits Forestiers Petit Paris
184. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c.
185. Produits Matra Inc.
186. Promobois G.D.S. inc.
187. Rayonier A.M. Canada GP
188. Rembos Inc.
189. Rene Bernard Inc.
190. Resolute FP Canada Inc./Resolute Forest Products Inc./Produits 
Forestiers Mauricie
191. Richard Lutes Cedar Inc.
192. Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc.
193. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee
194. S & K Cedar Products Ltd.
195. S&R Sawmills Ltd
196. S&W Forest Products Ltd.
197. San Industries Ltd.
198. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd.
199. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc.
200. Scierie St[hyphen]Michel inc.
201. Scierie West Brome Inc.
202. Scotsburn Lumber Co. Ltd.
203. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc.
204. Serpentine Cedar Ltd.
205. Serpentine Cedar Roofing Ltd.
206. Sexton Lumber Co. Ltd.
207. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd.
208. Silvaris Corporation
209. Silver Creek Premium Products Ltd.
210. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd.
211. Skana Forest Products Ltd.
212. Skeena Sawmills Ltd
213. Sound Spars Enterprise Ltd.
214. South Beach Trading Inc.
215. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc
216. Spruceland Millworks Inc.
217. Surrey Cedar Ltd.
218. T.G. Wood Products, Ltd
219. Taan Forest Products
220. Taiga Building Products Ltd.
221. Tall Tree Lumber Company
222. Teal Cedar Products Ltd.
223. Tembec Inc.
224. Terminal Forest Products Ltd.
225. The Teal-Jones Group
226. The Wood Source Inc.
227. Tolko Industries Ltd./Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd./Gilbert 
Smith Forest Products Ltd.
228. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd.
229. Triad Forest Products Ltd.
230. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc.
231. Tyee Timber Products Ltd.
232. Universal Lumber Sales Ltd.
233. Usine Sartigan Inc.
234. Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC
235. Valley Cedar 2 ULC
236. Vancouver Island Shingle, Ltd.
237. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd.
238. Visscher Lumber Inc
239. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc.
240. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd.
241. Watkins Sawmills Ltd.
242. West Bay Forest Products Ltd.
243. West Fraser Mills Ltd.
244. West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
245. West Wind Hardwood Inc.
246. Western Forest Products Inc.
247. Western Lumber Sales Limited
248. Western Wood Preservers Ltd.
249. Weston Forest Products Inc.
250. Westrend Exteriors Inc.
251. Weyerhaeuser Co.

[[Page 7286]]

252. White River Forest Products L.P.
253. Winton Homes Ltd.
254. Woodline Forest Products Ltd.
255. Woodstock Forest Products
256. Woodtone Specialties Inc.
257. Yarrow Wood Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2020-02471 Filed 2-6-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P