Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017-2018, 6911-6915 [2020-02360]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• International Trade Administration

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6911-6915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
New Shipper Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and 
Rescission of Review, in Part; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines 
that certain companies covered by the administrative review and new 
shipper reviews did not make sales of subject merchandise at prices 
below normal value (NV). We invite interested parties to comment on 
these preliminary results.

DATES: Applicable February 6, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin or Alexis Cherry, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6478 or (202) 
482-0607, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce is conducting an administrative review and an aligned new 
shipper review (NSR) of the antidumping duty order on multilayered wood 
flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China (China). The period 
of review (POR) for both reviews is December 1, 2017 through November 
30, 2018. The administrative review covers 99 companies, including two 
mandatory respondents: The Fusong Jinlong Group \1\ (Jinlong) and 
Jiangsu Guyu International Trade Co., Ltd. (Guyu). The new shipper 
review covers Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd. (Muchsee Wood). We 
preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by Jinlong 
and Guyu have not been made at prices below NV.\2\ We also 
preliminarily determine that a single sale of subject merchandise by 
Muchsee Wood has not been made at prices below NV.\3\ In addition, we 
are preliminarily granting separate rates to Jinlong, Guyu, Muchsee 
Wood and 54 producers/exporters, and determine that 21 producer/
exporters made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. 
Finally, we are rescinding the review with respect to

[[Page 6912]]

Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd. (Jinqiao 
Flooring).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commerce has previously indicated that Dalian Qianqiu Wooden 
Product Co., Ltd. (Dalian Qianqiu), Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., 
Ltd. (Fusong Jinlong), Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 
(Fusong Jinqiu), and Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. (Fusong 
Qianqiu) are collectively known as the ``Fusong Jinlong Group.'' See 
e.g., Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 
2011-2012, 79 FR 26712 (May 9, 2014) at n.14. We are addressing the 
status of these companies in a preliminary affiliation and 
collapsing analysis memorandum based on information on the record of 
this administrative review. See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum 
for the Preliminary Results in the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and New Shipper Review: Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China; 2017-2018'' (Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum), dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice, at the ``Affiliation and Single Entity'' section.
    \2\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Amended Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at 
Less than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 76690 
(December 8, 2011), as amended in Multilayered Wood Flooring from 
the People's Republic of China: Amended Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 5484 (February 3, 2012) 
(collectively, Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The product covered by the Order is MLWF from China. For a complete 
description of the scope of this administrative review, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.

Partial Rescission of Review

    Commerce initiated a review of 99 companies in this administrative 
review \5\ and one company in this new shipper review.\6\ Shenzhenshi 
Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd. (Huanwei Woods) and Jinqiao Flooring submitted 
timely requests to withdraw from the administrative review.\7\ No other 
parties requested a review of Jinqiao Flooring; however, the American 
Manufacturers of Multilayered Wood Flooring (the petitioners) requested 
a review of Huanwei Woods.\8\ Accordingly, Commerce is rescinding the 
administrative review only with respect to Jinqiao Flooring.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 9297 (March 14, 2019) (First 
Initiation Notice); see also Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 12200 (April 1, 
2019); Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 18777 (May 2, 2019); and Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 
3014 (January 17, 2020), correcting the First Initiation Notice 
(collectively, Initiation Notices).
    \6\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review; 2017-2018, 
84 FR 9494 (March 15, 2019).
    \7\ See Huanwei Woods' Letter, ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from 
People's Republic of China: Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and 
Withdrawal of Request for 2017-2018 Administrative Review,'' dated 
May 9, 2019; see also Jinqiao Flooring's Letter, ``Multilayered Wood 
Flooring from the People's Republic of China: 7th Administrative 
Review; Withdrawal of Administrative Review Request,'' dated June 
12, 2019.
    \8\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from 
the People's Republic of China: Request for Administrative Review,'' 
dated December 31, 2018.
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    Based on an analysis of information from U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP), no shipment certifications, and other record 
information, we preliminarily determine that 21 companies had no 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.\10\ For additional 
information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum. Consistent with our practice in non-market economy (NME) 
cases, we are not rescinding this administrative review with respect to 
these companies but, rather, intend to complete the review and issue 
appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the 
review.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
    \11\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) (NME 
AD Assessment) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rates

    We preliminarily determine that, in addition to Jinlong and Guyu, 
54 companies not individually examined are eligible for separate rates 
in this administrative review.\12\ We also preliminarily determine that 
Muchsee Wood is eligible for a separate rate in this new shipper 
review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 11-15, for more 
details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a separate rate to be applied to companies not 
selected for individual examination when Commerce limits its 
examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, Commerce 
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for 
calculating the all-others rate in an investigation, for guidance when 
calculating the rate for separate-rate respondents which Commerce did 
not examine individually in an administrative review. For the 
preliminary results of this administrative review, Commerce has 
determined the estimated dumping margins for Jinlong and Guyu to be 
zero.\13\ Because this is the only calculated POR margin available and 
in light of Albemarle Corp. v. United States, we are assigning this 
rate to all eligible non-selected respondents who qualify for a 
separate rate in this administrative review.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Memoranda, ``Preliminary Results Margin Calculation for 
the Fusong Jinlong Group'' and ``Preliminary Results Margin 
Calculation for Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.,'' both 
dated concurrently with this notice; see also Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum.
    \14\ See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. 
Cir. 2016); see also Preliminary Decision Memorandum at the 
``Weighted-Average Dumping Margin for Non-Examined Separate-Rate 
Companies in the Administrative Review'' section, for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The China-Wide Entity

    Commerce's policy regarding conditional review of the China-wide 
entity applies to this administrative review.\15\ Under this policy, 
the China-wide entity will not be under review unless a party 
specifically requests, or Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 
entity. Because no party requested a review of the China-wide entity, 
the entity is not under review, and the entity's rate is not subject to 
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Aside from the companies we preliminarily find made no shipments 
and the company for which the review is being rescinded, Commerce 
considers all other companies for which a review was requested and 
which did not demonstrate separate rate eligibility to be part of the 
China-wide entity.\16\ For the preliminary results of this review, we 
consider 18 companies to be part of the China-wide entity. For 
additional information, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Initiation Notices (``All firms listed below that wish 
to qualify for separate rate status in the administrative reviews 
involving NME countries must complete, as appropriate, either a 
separate rate application or certification, as described below.'') 
Companies that are subject to this administrative review that are 
considered to be part of the China-wide entity are listed in 
Appendix II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    We are conducting these reviews in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 
351.214. We calculated export prices for Jinlong, Guyu, and Muchsee 
Wood in accordance with section 772(a) of the Act. Because China is an 
NME within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, we calculated NV 
in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records 
Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete 
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/

[[Page 6913]]

index.html. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is included as Appendix I to this notice.

Preliminary Results of the Administrative Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the administrative review covering the period 
December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                          Exporters                             dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Fusong Jinlong Group....................................        0.00
Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.................        0.00
A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Benxi Wood Company..........................................        0.00
Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Dalian Shengyu Science And Technology Development Co., Ltd..        0.00
Dalian Shumaike Floor Manufacturing Co., Ltd................        0.00
Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC........................        0.00
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd....................        0.00
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.................        0.00
Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd......................        0.00
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products, Ltd.........................        0.00
Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited..........................        0.00
Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.........................        0.00
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd..............................        0.00
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd............        0.00
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd..............................        0.00
Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd......................        0.00
Karly Wood Product Limited..................................        0.00
Kember Flooring, Inc........................................        0.00
Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, Inc...................        0.00
Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc...........................        0.00
Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Omni Arbor Solutions Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd..............        0.00
Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.................................        0.00
Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd................        0.00
Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd................................        0.00
Yekalon Industry Inc........................................        0.00
Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd, (successor-in-interest         0.00
 to Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd)...............
Zhejiang Dadongwu Green Home Wood Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the New Shipper Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margin exists for the new shipper review covering the period 
December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
              Exporter                       Producer           dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd.....  Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou)        0.00
                                       Co., Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose to interested parties the calculations 
performed for these preliminary results within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after 
the date of publication of these preliminary results of review.\17\ 
Rebuttals to case briefs may be filed no later than five days after the 
written comments are filed, and all rebuttal comments must be limited 
to comments raised in the case briefs.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c).
    \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), parties who submit 
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this review are encouraged to submit 
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary 
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, limited to issues raised in the case and rebuttal 
briefs, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain 
the party's name, address, and telephone number, the number of 
participants, whether any participant is a foreign national, and a list 
of the issues to be discussed. If a request for a hearing is made, we 
intend to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, at a time and date to be 
determined. Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and 
location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date.
    Unless otherwise extended, we intend to issue the final results of 
these reviews, which will include the results of our analysis of the 
issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of 
these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

Assessment Rates

    Upon issuance of the final results, Commerce will determine, and 
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered 
by these reviews, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). For the 
companies for which the administrative review is rescinded, antidumping 
duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of 
estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or 
withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i). We intend to issue appropriate assessment 
instructions

[[Page 6914]]

with respect to the companies for which this administrative review is 
rescinded to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice.
    For any individually examined respondent whose (estimated) ad 
valorem weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis 
(i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, 
Commerce will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis 
of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the 
importer's examined sales and the total quantity of those sales, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\19\ Commerce will also calculate 
(estimated) ad valorem importer-specific assessment rates with which to 
assess whether the per-unit assessment rate is de minimis. We will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review when the importer-specific ad valorem assessment 
rate calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de 
minimis. If the individually examined respondents' ad valorem weighted-
average dumping margins continue to be zero or de minimis in the final 
results, or an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or 
de minimis,\20\ we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ In these preliminary results, Commerce applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
    \20\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the respondents that were not selected for individual 
examination in this administrative review that qualified for a separate 
rate, the assessment rate will be the separate rate established in the 
final results of this administrative review. If, in the final results, 
this rate continues to be zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 
percent), Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties.
    For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases 
submitted by the individually examined respondent, and for the 18 
companies that did not qualify for a separate rate in the 
administrative review, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate such 
entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 85.13 percent).\21\ In addition, 
if we continue to find in the final results no shipments of subject 
merchandise for the companies for which we preliminarily find no such 
shipments during the POR,\22\ Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 
any suspended entries of subject merchandise from those companies at 
the China-wide rate, with the exception of certain entries from Yingyi-
Nature and Changzhou Hawd that Commerce will identify in appropriate 
instructions to CBP.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016-2017, 84 FR 38002, 
38003 (August 5, 2019).
    \22\ See Appendix II for a list of these companies.
    \23\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65695 (October 24, 2011); see 
also Preliminary Determination Memorandum at the ''Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments'' section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of these reviews for all shipments of 
the subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies 
listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
the established in the final results; (2) for previously investigated 
or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters for which a review was 
not requested and that received a separate rate in a prior segment of 
this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing 
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, 
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the China-wide entity (i.e., 
85.13 percent); and (4) for all non-China exporters of subject 
merchandise that have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to Chinese exporter that supplied that 
non-Chinese exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.
    We are issuing and publishing the preliminary results of these 
reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(l), 751(a)(2)(B)(iv), 
751(a)(3), and 777(i)(l) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214 and 
351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: January 31, 2020.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Review
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Selection of Respondents
VI. Partial Rescission of Review
VII. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
VIII. Bona Fide Sale Analysis
IX. Discussion of the Methodology
X. Recommendation

Appendix II

No shipments

Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood Products Co. Ltd.
Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.
Benxi Flooring Factory (General Partnership)
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd.
Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Fine Furniture (Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited and Double F 
Limited) \24\
Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd.
Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., Ltd.
Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd.
Innomaster Home (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.
Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.
Kingman Floors Co., Ltd.
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd.
Shandong Longteng Wood Co., Ltd.
Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Xuzhou Antop International Trade Co., Ltd.
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
     
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Commerce is only reviewing entries where Fine Furniture 
(Shanghai) Limited and/or Double F Limited was the exporter but Fine 
Furniture (Shanghai) Limited was not the producer of subject 
merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entities

Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd.
Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd.
Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd.
Dalian Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd.
Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.
Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Guangzhou Homebon Timber Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

[[Page 6915]]

Houzhou Chenchang Wood Co., Ltd.
Jiafeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Power Dekor North America Inc.
Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd.
Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd.
Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd
Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd.

Rescissions

Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.

[FR Doc. 2020-02360 Filed 2-5-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P