Certain Fabricated Structural Steel From Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 5390-5394 [2020-01722]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 5390 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices traffic signals requirements, or (3) American National Standard Institute (ANSI) C136— American National Standard for Roadway and Area Lighting Equipment standards. The exclusion for steel traffic signal poles, steel roadway lighting poles, steel parking lot lighting poles, and steel sports lighting poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole covers; base plates that connect to either the shaft or the arms; mast arm clamps; mast arm tie rods; transformer base boxes; formed full base covers that hide anchor bolts; step lugs; internal cable guides; lighting cross arms; lighting service platforms; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; stainless steel hand hole door hinges and wind restraints; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. • Communication Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ANSI/TIA–222 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, or (2) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)— Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals. The exclusion for communication poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole covers; base plate that connects the pole to the foundation or arm to the pole; safety climbing cables; ladders; service ground platforms; step lugs; pole steps; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; coax, and safety brackets; subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 lbs. or less; service platforms; ice bridges; stainless steel hand hole door hinges and wind restraints; and steel templates. • OEM Round or Polygonal Tapered Steel Poles, segments or shaft components of such poles, that meet the (1) ASCE 48 or AASHTO, (2) ANSI/TIA 222, (3) ANSI 05.1, (4) RUS bulletin 1724E–204, or (5) RUS bulletin 1724E–214. The exclusion for OEM round or polygonal tapered steel poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 lbs. or less; mounts and platforms; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; bridge kits; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. The inclusion or attachment of one or more of the above-referenced steel poles in a structure containing fabricated structural steel does not remove the fabricated structural steel from the scope of the investigation. No language included in this exclusion should be read or understood to have applicability to any other aspect of this scope or to have applicability to or to exclude any product, part, or component other than those specifically identified in the exclusion. 9. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are Shuttering, Formworks, Propping and Shoring and parts and accessories thereof that comply with ANSI/ ASSE A10.9—Safety Requirements for Concrete and Masonry Work and ACI–347— VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jan 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 Recommended Practice for Concrete Formwork. For Shoring and propping made from tube, the outside diameter of the tubing covered by this exclusion ranges from 48mm to 250mm. For Shuttering and Formworks, the panel sizes covered by this exclusion range from 25mm × 600mm to 3000mm × 3000mm. 10. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are consumer items for do-ityourself assembly that are prepackaged for retail sale. For the purposes of this exclusion, prepackaged for retail sale means that, at the time of importation, all components necessary to assemble the merchandise, including all steel components, all accessory parts (e.g., screws, bolts, washers, nails), and instructions providing guidance on the assembly of the finished merchandise or directions on where to find such instructions, are enclosed in retail packaging, such that an end-use, retail consumer could assemble the completed product with no additional components. The items may enter the United States in one or in multiple retail packages as long as all of the components are imported together. The products subject to the investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings: 7308.90.3000, 7308.90.6000, and 7308.90.9590. The products subject to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS subheadings: 7216.91.0010, 7216.91.0090, 7216.99.0010, 7216.99.0090, 7222.40.6000, 7228.70.6000, 7301.10.0000, 7301.20.1000, 7301.20.5000, 7308.40.0000, 7308.90.9530, and 9406.90.0030. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. Primary and Manufacturing Sectors Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 8: Whether the E´nergir L.P. Efficiency Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 9: Whether the EcoPerformance Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 10: Whether the MEI Audit Industry 4.0 Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 11: Whether the Que´bec Scientific Research and Development Tax Credit is de facto Specific Comment 12: Whether the Tax Credit for Industrial Establishment from Ville de Thetford is de jure Specific Comment 13: Whether E´nergir L.P. is an ‘‘Authority’’ Comment 14: Whether Commerce Should Use Canatal’s Consolidated Sales Value Comment 15: Whether Taxes Should Be Included in the Benefit Amount for the Hydro-Quebec Industrial Systems Program Comment 16: Whether Commerce DoubleCounted Benefit Amounts for Certain Programs Used by Canatal Comment 17: Whether Commerce Correctly Determined that Three Hydro-Que´bec Programs Were Not Used in the POI VIII. Recommendation Appendix II Certain Fabricated Structural Steel From Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Subsidies Valuation Information VI. Analysis of Programs VII. Analysis of Comments Comment 1: Whether There Was Sufficient Industry Support to Initiate this Investigation Comment 2: Whether to Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to the Respondents Comment 3: Whether to Adjust the Respondents’ Denominator Comment 4: Whether the Additional Depreciation for Class 1 and 1B Assets Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 5: Whether the Hydro-Que´bec Industrial Systems (Energy Efficiency) Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 6: Whether the Que´bec Tax Credit for On-the-Job Training Program is Specific and Provides a Countervailable Benefit Comment 7: Whether the Que´bec Additional Reduction in Tax Rate for PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2020–01719 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–850] Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain fabricated structural steel (fabricated structural steel) from Mexico is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018. The final dumping margins of sales at LTFV are shown in the ‘‘Final Determination’’ section of this notice. DATES: Applicable January 30, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill or Aleksandras Nakutis, AD/ CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4037 or (202) 482–3147, respectively. AGENCY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices Background Scope Comments On September 10, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination of sales at LTFV of fabricated structural steel from Mexico, in which we also postponed the final determination to January 23, 2020.1 The petitioner in this investigation is the American Institute of Steel Construction Full Member Subgroup. The mandatory respondents in this investigation are Building Systems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (BSM) and Corey S.A. de C.V. (Corey).2 A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this final determination, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. In accordance with the preamble to Commerce’s regulations,4 the Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).5 Certain interested parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in the Initiation Notice. Commerce addressed these comments in the Preliminary Determination, wherein Commerce preliminarily modified the scope language. In addition, certain interested parties commented on Commerce’s preliminary scope decisions. For a summary of the product coverage comments and rebuttal comments submitted to the record for this final determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.6 Based on the comments received, Commerce is modifying the scope language as it appeared in the Preliminary Determination. See the revised scope in Appendix I to this notice. Scope of the Investigation khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The product covered by this investigation is fabricated structural steel from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix I. 1 See Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 84 FR 47487 (September 10, 2019) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 Corey refers to the collapsed entity consisting of Corey S.A. de C.V. and Industrias Recal S.A. de C.V.; see Preliminary Determination and accompanying PDM; see also Memorandum, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico: Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum for Corey S.A. de C.V.,’’ dated September 3, 2019. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jan 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix II. Verification As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), in September and October 2019, we conducted verifications of the sales and cost information submitted by BSM and Corey for use in our final determination. We used standard verification procedures, including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, and original source documents provided by BSM and Corey.7 4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). 5 See Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada, Mexico, and the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 84 FR 7330, 7331 (March 4, 2019) (Initiation Notice). 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada, Mexico, and the People’s Republic of China: Final Scope Decision Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Final Scope Decision Memorandum). 7 For a discussion of our verification findings, see Memoranda, ‘‘Verification of the Sales Questionnaire Responses of Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,’’ dated October 31, 2019; ‘‘Verification of NCI Group, Inc. and RobertsonCeco II Corporation in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,’’ dated October 31, 2019; PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5391 Changes Since the Preliminary Determination Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at verification, we made certain changes to the dumping margin calculations. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum and Final Calculation Memoranda.8 In addition, we revised the margin calculation for BSM to reflect the application of partial facts available with an adverse inference pursuant to section 776 of the Act. For a discussion of this change, see Comment 16 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum. All-Others Rate Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all-others rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and margins determined entirely under section 776 of the Act. BSM is the only respondent for which Commerce calculated an estimated weightedaverage dumping margin that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Therefore, for purposes of determining the all-others rate, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we are using the estimated weighted-average dumping margin calculated for BSM, as referenced in the ‘‘Final Determination’’ section below. Use of Adverse Facts Available In the Preliminary Determination, we based the dumping margins for certain non-responsive companies on adverse facts available (AFA).9 The AFA rate is ‘‘Verification of the Cost Responses of Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,’’ dated November 1, 2019; ‘‘Verification of the Sales Response of Corey S.A. de C.V. and Industrias Recal S.A. de C.V.’’ dated November 5, 2019; and ‘‘Verification of the Cost Response of Corey S.A. de C.V. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,’’ dated October 31, 2019). 8 See Memoranda, ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel From Mexico: Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.’’; ‘‘Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the Final Determination—Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.’’; ‘‘Analysis Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico: Corey S.A. de C.V.’’; and ‘‘Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the Final Determination—Corey S.A. de C.V.,’’ all dated concurrently with this notice (collectively, Final Calculation Memoranda). 9 See Preliminary Determination and accompanying PDM. E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 5392 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices the only, and therefore, the highest, dumping margin in the petition (i.e., 30.58 percent). We received no comments on our determination to use AFA with respect to these companies. Accordingly, we are continuing to assign a dumping margin based on AFA to the non-responsive companies in this investigation. Final Determination The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as follows: Estimated weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Exporter/producer Building Systems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V .............................................................................................................. Corey S.A. de C.V./Industrias Recal S.A. de C.V ................................................................................................... Acero Technologia, S.A. de C.V ............................................................................................................................. Construcciones Industriales Tapia S.A. de C.V ...................................................................................................... Estructuras Metalicas la Popular S.A. de C.V./MSCI ............................................................................................. Operadora CICSA, S.A. de C.V. Swecomex—Guadalajara ................................................................................... All Others ................................................................................................................................................................. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Disclosure Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in connection with this final determination within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) and C of the Act, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of all appropriate entries of fabricated structural steel from Mexico, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register other than entries of fabricated structural steel produced and exported by Corey, because its rate is zero. These suspension-of-liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. In addition, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit for such entries of merchandise equal to the estimated weighted-average dumping margin as follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the table above will be equal to the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin identified for that company in the table; (2) if the exporter is not a company listed in the table above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to the companyspecific estimated weighted-average dumping margin listed for that producer of the subject merchandise in the above table; and (3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average dumping margin. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jan 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect until further notice. To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export subsidies determined in a companion CVD proceeding when CVD provisional measures are in effect. Accordingly, where Commerce makes an affirmative determination for export subsidies, Commerce offsets the calculated estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the appropriate rate(s). In this case, we have found export subsidies for certain respondents. However, suspension of liquidation for provisional measures in the companion CVD case has been discontinued; therefore, we are not instructing CBP to collect cash deposits based upon the estimated weighted-average dumping margin adjusted for export subsidies at this time. International Trade Commission Notification In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce’s final determination is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of sales) of subject merchandise for importation no later than 45 days after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash deposits posted will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such injury PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Cash deposit rate (adjusted for subsidy offset(s)) (percent) 8.47 0 30.58 30.58 30.58 30.58 8.47 8.47 0 0 0 0 0 0 does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the ‘‘Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation’’ section of this notice. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO) In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, this notice will serve as a final reminder to the parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties This determination is issued and published in accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c). Dated: January 23, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I Scope of the Investigation The merchandise covered by the investigation is carbon and alloy fabricated structural steel. Fabricated structural steel is made from steel in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is two percent or less by weight. Fabricated structural steel products are steel E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices products that have been fabricated for erection or assembly into structures, including, but not limited to, buildings (commercial, office, institutional, and multifamily residential); industrial and utility projects; parking decks; arenas and convention centers; medical facilities; and ports, transportation and infrastructure facilities. Fabricated structural steel is manufactured from carbon and alloy (including stainless) steel products such as angles, columns, beams, girders, plates, flange shapes (including manufactured structural shapes utilizing welded plates as a substitute for rolled wide flange sections), channels, hollow structural section (HSS) shapes, base plates, and plate-work components. Fabrication includes, but is not limited to cutting, drilling, welding, joining, bolting, bending, punching, pressure fitting, molding, grooving, adhesion, beveling, and riveting and may include items such as fasteners, nuts, bolts, rivets, screws, hinges, or joints. The inclusion, attachment, joining, or assembly of non-steel components with fabricated structural steel does not remove the fabricated structural steel from the scope. Fabricated structural steel is covered by the scope of the investigation regardless of whether it is painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other metallic or nonmetallic substances and regardless of whether it is assembled or partially assembled, such as into modules, modularized construction units, or subassemblies of fabricated structural steel. Subject merchandise includes fabricated structural steel that has been assembled or further processed in the subject country or a third country, including but not limited to painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, drilling, welding, joining, bolting, punching, bending, beveling, riveting, galvanizing, coating, and/or slitting or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the country of manufacture of the fabricated structural steel. All products that meet the written physical description of the merchandise covered by the investigation are within the scope of the investigation unless specifically excluded or covered by the scope of an existing antidumping duty order. Specifically excluded from the scope of the investigation are: 1. Fabricated steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) if: (i) It is a unitary piece of fabricated rebar, not joined, welded, or otherwise connected with any other steel product or part; or (ii) it is joined, welded, or otherwise connected only to other rebar. 2. Fabricated structural steel for bridges and bridge sections that meets American Association of State and Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) bridge construction requirements or any state or local derivatives of the AASHTO bridge construction requirements. 3. Pre-engineered metal building systems, which are defined as complete metal buildings that integrate steel framing, roofing and walls to form one, pre-engineered building system, that meet Metal Building Manufacturers Association guide VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jan 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 specifications. Pre-engineered metal building systems are typically limited in height to no more than 60 feet or two stories. 4. Steel roof and floor decking systems that meet Steel Deck Institute standards. 5. Open web steel bar joists and joist girders that meet Steel Joist Institute specifications. 6. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation is scaffolding, and parts and accessories thereof, that comply with ANSI/ ASSE A10.8—2011—Scaffolding Safety Requirements, and/or Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations at 29 CFR part 1926 subpart L—Scaffolds. The outside diameter of the scaffold tubing covered by this exclusion ranges from 25mm to 150mm. 7. Excluded from the scope of the investigation are access flooring systems panels and accessories, where such panels have a total thickness ranging from 0.75 inches to 1.75 inches and consist of concrete, wood, other non-steel materials, or hollow space permanently attached to a top and bottom layer of galvanized or painted steel sheet or formed coil steel, the whole of which has been formed into a square or rectangle having a measurement of 24 inches on each side ± 0.1 inch; 24 inches by 30 inches ± 0.1 inch; or 24 by 36 inches ± 0.1 inch. 8. Excluded from the investigation are the following types of steel poles, segments of steel poles, and steel components of those poles: • Steel Electric Transmission Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)—Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures, ASCE/SEI 48 or (2) the USDA RUS bulletin 1724E–214 Guide specification for standard class Steel Transmission Poles. The exclusion for steel electric transmission poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Transmission arms which attach to poles; pole bases; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; steel vangs, steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. • Steel Electric Substation Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)—Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 113. The exclusion for steel electric substation poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Substation dead end poles; substation bus stands; substation mast poles, arms, and cross-arms; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; pole bases; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. • Steel Electric Distribution Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)—Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures, ASCE/SEI 48, (2) USDA RUS bulletin 1724E–204 Guide specification for steel single pole and H-frame structures, or (3) ANSI 05.1 height and class requirements for steel poles. The exclusion for steel electric distribution poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Distribution arms and cross-arms; pole bases; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; steel vangs, steel brackets, steel flanges, and PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 5393 steel caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. • Steel Traffic Signal Poles, Steel Roadway Lighting Poles, Steel Parking Lot Lighting Poles, and Steel Sports Lighting Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)— Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals, (2) any state or local derivatives of the AASHTO highway sign, luminaries, and traffic signals requirements, or (3) American National Standard Institute (ANSI) C136— American National Standard for Roadway and Area Lighting Equipment standards. The exclusion for steel traffic signal poles, steel roadway lighting poles, steel parking lot lighting poles, and steel sports lighting poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole covers; base plates that connect to either the shaft or the arms; mast arm clamps; mast arm tie rods; transformer base boxes; formed full base covers that hide anchor bolts; step lugs; internal cable guides; lighting cross arms; lighting service platforms; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; stainless steel hand hole door hinges and wind restraints; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. • Communication Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ANSI/TIA–222 Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, or (2) American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)— Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals. The exclusion for communication poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole covers; base plate that connects the pole to the foundation or arm to the pole; safety climbing cables; ladders; service ground platforms; step lugs; pole steps; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″, coax, and safety brackets; subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 lbs. or less; service platforms; ice bridges; stainless steel hand hole door hinges and wind restraints; and steel templates. • OEM Round or Polygonal Tapered Steel Poles, segments or shaft components of such poles, that meet the (1) ASCE 48 or AASHTO, (2) ANSI/TIA 222, (3) ANSI 05.1, (4) RUS bulletin 1724E–204, or (5) RUS bulletin 1724E–214. The exclusion for OEM round or polygonal tapered steel poles also encompasses the following components thereof: Subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 lbs. or less; mounts and platforms; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; angles that do not exceed 8″ x 8″ x 0.75″; bridge kits; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates. The inclusion or attachment of one or more of the above-referenced steel poles in a structure containing fabricated structural steel (FSS) does not remove the FSS from the scope of the investigation. No language E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 5394 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices included in this exclusion should be read or understood to have applicability to any other aspect of this scope or to have applicability to or to exclude any product, part, or component other than those specifically identified in the exclusion. 9. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are Shuttering, Formworks, Propping and Shoring and parts and accessories thereof that comply with ANSI/ ASSE A10.9—Safety Requirements for Concrete and Masonry Work and ACI–347— Recommended Practice for Concrete Formwork. For Shoring and propping made from tube, the outside diameter of the tubing covered by this exclusion ranges from 48mm to 250mm. For Shuttering and Formworks, the panel sizes covered by this exclusion range from 25mm X 600mm to 3000mm X 3000mm. 10. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are consumer items for do-ityourself assembly that are prepackaged for retail sale. For the purposes of this exclusion, prepackaged for retail sale means that, at the time of importation, all components necessary to assemble the merchandise, including all steel components, all accessory parts (e.g., screws, bolts, washers, nails), and instructions providing guidance on the assembly of the finished merchandise or directions on where to find such instructions, are enclosed in retail packaging, such that an end-use, retail consumer could assemble the completed product with no additional components. The items may enter the United States in one or in multiple retail packages as long as all of the components are imported together. The products subject to the investigation are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings: 7308.90.3000, 7308.90.6000, and 7308.90.9590. The products subject to the investigation may also enter under the following HTSUS subheadings: 7216.91.0010, 7216.91.0090, 7216.99.0010, 7216.99.0090, 7222.40.6000, 7228.70.6000, 7301.10.0000, 7301.20.1000, 7301.20.5000, 7308.40.0000, 7308.90.9530, and 9406.90.0030. The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Appendix II List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of Investigation IV. Scope Comments V. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination VI. Discussion of the Issues General Comment 1: Reporting Requirements for U.S. Sales Comment 2: Remove Home-Market Projects Outside the Reporting Requirements for U.S. Sales in the Constructed Value Profit Calculation BSM Comment 3: Whether BSM Failed To Report Accurate and Reliable U.S. Prices, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:56 Jan 29, 2020 Jkt 250001 and Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available to BSM Comment 4: Whether BSM Should Report the Value of Subject Merchandise Through a Section E Questionnaire Response Comment 5: Valuation of an Order Associated With Two Different Sales Comment 6: Whether BSM Double Counted Revenue for an Order Comment 7: Alternate Differential Pricing Analysis Comment 8: Grant CEP Offset Comment 9: CEP Profit Rate Calculation Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Use BSM’s Reported Date of Sale Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Use the Revised Indirect Selling Expense Ratio for Components Segment Sales Comment 12: BSM’s Affiliated Party Input Purchases Comment 13: CV Profit Rate Used for BSM Comment 14: BSM’s Financial Expense Ratio Comment 15: Adjustments Required by Mexican Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS) Comment 16: Application of Partial Facts Available With Adverse Inferences Corey Comment 17: Whether Corey’s Hudson Yards Tower A Project Sale Fell Within the POI Comment 18: Whether To Rescind Voluntary Respondent Treatment of Corey Comment 19: Adjust Corey’s Report Costs To Account for All Affiliated Purchases Comment 20: Subtract Scrap Revenue From Total Cost of Manufacturing VII. Recommendation Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2623. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 14, 2019, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CVP 23 from India.1 Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal government closure from December 22, 2018 through the resumption of operations on January 29, 2019.2 The revised deadline for the preliminary results in this administrative review was October 3, 2019.3 Subsequently, on August 15, 2019, Commerce postponed the deadline for the preliminary results of this administrative review until January 31, 2020, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).4 Scope of the Order 5 The merchandise covered by the Order is CVP–23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2-b:3′,2′m] 6 triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5, 15-dihydro-, and molecular [FR Doc. 2020–01722 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–838] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite), a producer/exporter of carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India, did not sell subject merchandise at prices below normal value (NV) during the period of review (POR) December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018. DATES: Applicable January 30, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Ayache, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 9297 (March 14, 2019). 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 40 days. 3 See Memorandum to the Record from Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Director, Office VIII, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘December Order Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated August 7, 2019. 4 See Memorandum to James Maeder, Deputy Assistance Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated August 15, 2019. 5 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From India, 69 FR 77988 (December 29, 2004) (Order). 6 The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business proprietary information. In this case, the brackets are simply part of the chemical nomenclature. See ‘‘Amendment to Petition for Antidumping Investigations of China and India and a Countervailing Duty Investigation of India on Imports of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 in the forms of Crude Pigment, Presscake and Dry Color Pigment,’’ dated December 3, 2003, at 8. E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5390-5394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-850]


Certain Fabricated Structural Steel From Mexico: Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
fabricated structural steel (fabricated structural steel) from Mexico 
is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than 
fair value (LTFV). The period of investigation (POI) is January 1, 2018 
through December 31, 2018. The final dumping margins of sales at LTFV 
are shown in the ``Final Determination'' section of this notice.

DATES: Applicable January 30, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krisha Hill or Aleksandras Nakutis, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4037 or (202) 
482-3147, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

[[Page 5391]]

Background

    On September 10, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary 
Determination of sales at LTFV of fabricated structural steel from 
Mexico, in which we also postponed the final determination to January 
23, 2020.\1\ The petitioner in this investigation is the American 
Institute of Steel Construction Full Member Subgroup. The mandatory 
respondents in this investigation are Building Systems de Mexico, S.A. 
de C.V. (BSM) and Corey S.A. de C.V. (Corey).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico: 
Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 84 FR 47487 
(September 10, 2019) (Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ Corey refers to the collapsed entity consisting of Corey 
S.A. de C.V. and Industrias Recal S.A. de C.V.; see Preliminary 
Determination and accompanying PDM; see also Memorandum, 
``Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fabricated Structural Steel from 
Mexico: Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum for Corey 
S.A. de C.V.,'' dated September 3, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the 
Preliminary Determination, as well as a full discussion of the issues 
raised by parties for this final determination, are discussed in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this 
notice.\3\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, 
and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main 
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Affirmative Determination in the Less-Than-Fair-Value 
Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,'' 
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is fabricated structural 
steel from Mexico. For a complete description of the scope of this 
investigation, see Appendix I.

Scope Comments

    In accordance with the preamble to Commerce's regulations,\4\ the 
Initiation Notice set aside a period of time for parties to raise 
issues regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).\5\ Certain interested 
parties commented on the scope of the investigation as it appeared in 
the Initiation Notice. Commerce addressed these comments in the 
Preliminary Determination, wherein Commerce preliminarily modified the 
scope language.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
    \5\ See Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada, Mexico, 
and the People's Republic of China: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-
Value Investigations, 84 FR 7330, 7331 (March 4, 2019) (Initiation 
Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, certain interested parties commented on Commerce's 
preliminary scope decisions. For a summary of the product coverage 
comments and rebuttal comments submitted to the record for this final 
determination, and accompanying discussion and analysis of all comments 
timely received, see the Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\6\ Based on 
the comments received, Commerce is modifying the scope language as it 
appeared in the Preliminary Determination. See the revised scope in 
Appendix I to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Fabricated Structural Steel from Canada, 
Mexico, and the People's Republic of China: Final Scope Decision 
Memorandum,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice (Final Scope Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 
this investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 
A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix II.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), in September and October 2019, we conducted verifications of 
the sales and cost information submitted by BSM and Corey for use in 
our final determination. We used standard verification procedures, 
including an examination of relevant accounting and production records, 
and original source documents provided by BSM and Corey.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For a discussion of our verification findings, see 
Memoranda, ``Verification of the Sales Questionnaire Responses of 
Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V. in the Antidumping Duty 
Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,'' 
dated October 31, 2019; ``Verification of NCI Group, Inc. and 
Robertson-Ceco II Corporation in the Antidumping Duty Investigation 
of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,'' dated October 
31, 2019; ``Verification of the Cost Responses of Building Systems 
de Mexico S.A. de C.V. in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of 
Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from Mexico,'' dated November 1, 
2019; ``Verification of the Sales Response of Corey S.A. de C.V. and 
Industrias Recal S.A. de C.V.'' dated November 5, 2019; and 
``Verification of the Cost Response of Corey S.A. de C.V. in the 
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Fabricated Structural Steel from 
Mexico,'' dated October 31, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at 
verification, we made certain changes to the dumping margin 
calculations. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum and Final Calculation Memoranda.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Memoranda, ``Analysis Memorandum for the Final 
Determination in the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain 
Fabricated Structural Steel From Mexico: Building Systems de Mexico 
S.A. de C.V.''; ``Constructed Value Calculation Adjustments for the 
Final Determination--Building Systems de Mexico S.A. de C.V.''; 
``Analysis Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Antidumping 
Duty Investigation of Certain Fabricated Structural Steel from 
Mexico: Corey S.A. de C.V.''; and ``Constructed Value Calculation 
Adjustments for the Final Determination--Corey S.A. de C.V.,'' all 
dated concurrently with this notice (collectively, Final Calculation 
Memoranda).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we revised the margin calculation for BSM to reflect 
the application of partial facts available with an adverse inference 
pursuant to section 776 of the Act. For a discussion of this change, 
see Comment 16 of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

All-Others Rate

    Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that the estimated all-
others rate shall be an amount equal to the weighted average of the 
estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters 
and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de 
minimis margins, and margins determined entirely under section 776 of 
the Act. BSM is the only respondent for which Commerce calculated an 
estimated weighted-average dumping margin that is not zero, de minimis, 
or based entirely on facts otherwise available. Therefore, for purposes 
of determining the all-others rate, pursuant to section 735(c)(5)(A) of 
the Act, we are using the estimated weighted-average dumping margin 
calculated for BSM, as referenced in the ``Final Determination'' 
section below.

Use of Adverse Facts Available

    In the Preliminary Determination, we based the dumping margins for 
certain non-responsive companies on adverse facts available (AFA).\9\ 
The AFA rate is

[[Page 5392]]

the only, and therefore, the highest, dumping margin in the petition 
(i.e., 30.58 percent). We received no comments on our determination to 
use AFA with respect to these companies. Accordingly, we are continuing 
to assign a dumping margin based on AFA to the non-responsive companies 
in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Preliminary Determination and accompanying PDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination

    The final estimated weighted-average dumping margins are as 
follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Estimated     Cash deposit
                                             weighted-    rate (adjusted
            Exporter/producer                 average       for subsidy
                                          dumping margin    offset(s))
                                             (percent)       (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Building Systems de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.            8.47            8.47
Corey S.A. de C.V./Industrias Recal S.A.               0               0
 de C.V.................................
Acero Technologia, S.A. de C.V..........           30.58               0
Construcciones Industriales Tapia S.A.             30.58               0
 de C.V.................................
Estructuras Metalicas la Popular S.A. de           30.58               0
 C.V./MSCI..............................
Operadora CICSA, S.A. de C.V. Swecomex--           30.58               0
 Guadalajara............................
All Others..............................            8.47               0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations performed in 
connection with this final determination within five days of the date 
of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) and C of the Act, Commerce 
will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend 
liquidation of all appropriate entries of fabricated structural steel 
from Mexico, as described in Appendix I of this notice, which are 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register other than 
entries of fabricated structural steel produced and exported by Corey, 
because its rate is zero. These suspension-of-liquidation instructions 
will remain in effect until further notice.
    In addition, pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.210(d), Commerce will instruct CBP to require a cash deposit 
for such entries of merchandise equal to the estimated weighted-average 
dumping margin as follows: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies 
listed in the table above will be equal to the company-specific 
estimated weighted-average dumping margin identified for that company 
in the table; (2) if the exporter is not a company listed in the table 
above, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be equal to 
the company-specific estimated weighted-average dumping margin listed 
for that producer of the subject merchandise in the above table; and 
(3) the cash deposit rate for all other producers and exporters will be 
equal to the all-others estimated weighted-average dumping margin. 
These suspension of liquidation instructions will remain in effect 
until further notice.
    To determine the cash deposit rate, Commerce normally adjusts the 
estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the amount of export 
subsidies determined in a companion CVD proceeding when CVD provisional 
measures are in effect. Accordingly, where Commerce makes an 
affirmative determination for export subsidies, Commerce offsets the 
calculated estimated weighted-average dumping margin by the appropriate 
rate(s). In this case, we have found export subsidies for certain 
respondents. However, suspension of liquidation for provisional 
measures in the companion CVD case has been discontinued; therefore, we 
are not instructing CBP to collect cash deposits based upon the 
estimated weighted-average dumping margin adjusted for export subsidies 
at this time.

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, Commerce will notify 
the International Trade Commission (ITC) of its final affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV. Because Commerce's final determination 
is affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the 
ITC will make its final determination as to whether the domestic 
industry in the United States is materially injured, or threatened with 
material injury, by reason of imports or sales (or the likelihood of 
sales) of subject merchandise for importation no later than 45 days 
after this final determination. If the ITC determines that such injury 
does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated, and all cash 
deposits posted will be refunded. If the ITC determines that such 
injury does exist, Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order 
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, 
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective 
date of the suspension of liquidation, as discussed above in the 
``Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation'' section of this notice.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury 
determination, this notice will serve as a final reminder to the 
parties subject to APO of their responsibility concerning the 
disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of return 
or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective 
order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This determination is issued and published in accordance with 
sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.210(c).

    Dated: January 23, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by the investigation is carbon and alloy 
fabricated structural steel. Fabricated structural steel is made 
from steel in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is two 
percent or less by weight. Fabricated structural steel products are 
steel

[[Page 5393]]

products that have been fabricated for erection or assembly into 
structures, including, but not limited to, buildings (commercial, 
office, institutional, and multi-family residential); industrial and 
utility projects; parking decks; arenas and convention centers; 
medical facilities; and ports, transportation and infrastructure 
facilities. Fabricated structural steel is manufactured from carbon 
and alloy (including stainless) steel products such as angles, 
columns, beams, girders, plates, flange shapes (including 
manufactured structural shapes utilizing welded plates as a 
substitute for rolled wide flange sections), channels, hollow 
structural section (HSS) shapes, base plates, and plate-work 
components. Fabrication includes, but is not limited to cutting, 
drilling, welding, joining, bolting, bending, punching, pressure 
fitting, molding, grooving, adhesion, beveling, and riveting and may 
include items such as fasteners, nuts, bolts, rivets, screws, 
hinges, or joints.
    The inclusion, attachment, joining, or assembly of non-steel 
components with fabricated structural steel does not remove the 
fabricated structural steel from the scope.
    Fabricated structural steel is covered by the scope of the 
investigation regardless of whether it is painted, varnished, or 
coated with plastics or other metallic or non-metallic substances 
and regardless of whether it is assembled or partially assembled, 
such as into modules, modularized construction units, or sub-
assemblies of fabricated structural steel.
    Subject merchandise includes fabricated structural steel that 
has been assembled or further processed in the subject country or a 
third country, including but not limited to painting, varnishing, 
trimming, cutting, drilling, welding, joining, bolting, punching, 
bending, beveling, riveting, galvanizing, coating, and/or slitting 
or any other processing that would not otherwise remove the 
merchandise from the scope of the investigation if performed in the 
country of manufacture of the fabricated structural steel.
    All products that meet the written physical description of the 
merchandise covered by the investigation are within the scope of the 
investigation unless specifically excluded or covered by the scope 
of an existing antidumping duty order.
    Specifically excluded from the scope of the investigation are:
    1. Fabricated steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) if: (i) It 
is a unitary piece of fabricated rebar, not joined, welded, or 
otherwise connected with any other steel product or part; or (ii) it 
is joined, welded, or otherwise connected only to other rebar.
    2. Fabricated structural steel for bridges and bridge sections 
that meets American Association of State and Highway and 
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) bridge construction requirements 
or any state or local derivatives of the AASHTO bridge construction 
requirements.
    3. Pre-engineered metal building systems, which are defined as 
complete metal buildings that integrate steel framing, roofing and 
walls to form one, pre-engineered building system, that meet Metal 
Building Manufacturers Association guide specifications. Pre-
engineered metal building systems are typically limited in height to 
no more than 60 feet or two stories.
    4. Steel roof and floor decking systems that meet Steel Deck 
Institute standards.
    5. Open web steel bar joists and joist girders that meet Steel 
Joist Institute specifications.
    6. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation is 
scaffolding, and parts and accessories thereof, that comply with 
ANSI/ASSE A10.8--2011--Scaffolding Safety Requirements, and/or 
Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations at 29 CFR 
part 1926 subpart L--Scaffolds. The outside diameter of the scaffold 
tubing covered by this exclusion ranges from 25mm to 150mm.
    7. Excluded from the scope of the investigation are access 
flooring systems panels and accessories, where such panels have a 
total thickness ranging from 0.75 inches to 1.75 inches and consist 
of concrete, wood, other non-steel materials, or hollow space 
permanently attached to a top and bottom layer of galvanized or 
painted steel sheet or formed coil steel, the whole of which has 
been formed into a square or rectangle having a measurement of 24 
inches on each side  0.1 inch; 24 inches by 30 inches 
 0.1 inch; or 24 by 36 inches  0.1 inch.
    8. Excluded from the investigation are the following types of 
steel poles, segments of steel poles, and steel components of those 
poles:
     Steel Electric Transmission Poles, or segments of such 
poles, that meet (1) the American Society of Civil Engineers 
(ASCE)--Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures, ASCE/SEI 48 or 
(2) the USDA RUS bulletin 1724E-214 Guide specification for standard 
class Steel Transmission Poles. The exclusion for steel electric 
transmission poles also encompasses the following components 
thereof: Transmission arms which attach to poles; pole bases; angles 
that do not exceed 8'' x 8'' x 0.75''; steel vangs, steel brackets, 
steel flanges, and steel caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and 
steel templates.
     Steel Electric Substation Poles, or segments of such 
poles, that meet the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)--
Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 113. The exclusion 
for steel electric substation poles also encompasses the following 
components thereof: Substation dead end poles; substation bus 
stands; substation mast poles, arms, and cross-arms; steel brackets, 
steel flanges, and steel caps; pole bases; safety climbing cables; 
ladders; and steel templates.
     Steel Electric Distribution Poles, or segments of such 
poles, that meet (1) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)--
Design of Steel Transmission Pole Structures, ASCE/SEI 48, (2) USDA 
RUS bulletin 1724E-204 Guide specification for steel single pole and 
H-frame structures, or (3) ANSI 05.1 height and class requirements 
for steel poles. The exclusion for steel electric distribution poles 
also encompasses the following components thereof: Distribution arms 
and cross-arms; pole bases; angles that do not exceed 8'' x 8'' x 
0.75''; steel vangs, steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel caps; 
safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates.
     Steel Traffic Signal Poles, Steel Roadway Lighting 
Poles, Steel Parking Lot Lighting Poles, and Steel Sports Lighting 
Poles, or segments of such poles, that meet (1) the American 
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)--
Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, 
Luminaires, and Traffic Signals, (2) any state or local derivatives 
of the AASHTO highway sign, luminaries, and traffic signals 
requirements, or (3) American National Standard Institute (ANSI) 
C136--American National Standard for Roadway and Area Lighting 
Equipment standards. The exclusion for steel traffic signal poles, 
steel roadway lighting poles, steel parking lot lighting poles, and 
steel sports lighting poles also encompasses the following 
components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole 
covers; base plates that connect to either the shaft or the arms; 
mast arm clamps; mast arm tie rods; transformer base boxes; formed 
full base covers that hide anchor bolts; step lugs; internal cable 
guides; lighting cross arms; lighting service platforms; angles that 
do not exceed 8'' x 8'' x 0.75''; stainless steel hand hole door 
hinges and wind restraints; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel 
caps; safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates.
     Communication Poles, or segments of such poles, that 
meet (1) Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ANSI/TIA-222 
Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting 
Structures, or (2) American Association of State Highway and 
Transportation Officials (AASHTO)--Specifications for Structural 
Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals. The 
exclusion for communication poles also encompasses the following 
components thereof: Luminaire arms; hand hole rims; hand hole 
covers; base plate that connects the pole to the foundation or arm 
to the pole; safety climbing cables; ladders; service ground 
platforms; step lugs; pole steps; steel brackets, steel flanges, and 
steel caps; angles that do not exceed 8'' x 8'' x 0.75'', coax, and 
safety brackets; subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 
lbs. or less; service platforms; ice bridges; stainless steel hand 
hole door hinges and wind restraints; and steel templates.
     OEM Round or Polygonal Tapered Steel Poles, segments or 
shaft components of such poles, that meet the (1) ASCE 48 or AASHTO, 
(2) ANSI/TIA 222, (3) ANSI 05.1, (4) RUS bulletin 1724E-204, or (5) 
RUS bulletin 1724E-214. The exclusion for OEM round or polygonal 
tapered steel poles also encompasses the following components 
thereof: Subcomponent kits for antenna mounts weighing 80 lbs. or 
less; mounts and platforms; steel brackets, steel flanges, and steel 
caps; angles that do not exceed 8'' x 8'' x 0.75''; bridge kits; 
safety climbing cables; ladders; and steel templates.
    The inclusion or attachment of one or more of the above-
referenced steel poles in a structure containing fabricated 
structural steel (FSS) does not remove the FSS from the scope of the 
investigation. No language

[[Page 5394]]

included in this exclusion should be read or understood to have 
applicability to any other aspect of this scope or to have 
applicability to or to exclude any product, part, or component other 
than those specifically identified in the exclusion.
    9. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are 
Shuttering, Formworks, Propping and Shoring and parts and 
accessories thereof that comply with ANSI/ASSE A10.9--Safety 
Requirements for Concrete and Masonry Work and ACI-347--Recommended 
Practice for Concrete Formwork. For Shoring and propping made from 
tube, the outside diameter of the tubing covered by this exclusion 
ranges from 48mm to 250mm. For Shuttering and Formworks, the panel 
sizes covered by this exclusion range from 25mm X 600mm to 3000mm X 
3000mm.
    10. Also excluded from the scope of the investigation are 
consumer items for do-it-yourself assembly that are prepackaged for 
retail sale. For the purposes of this exclusion, prepackaged for 
retail sale means that, at the time of importation, all components 
necessary to assemble the merchandise, including all steel 
components, all accessory parts (e.g., screws, bolts, washers, 
nails), and instructions providing guidance on the assembly of the 
finished merchandise or directions on where to find such 
instructions, are enclosed in retail packaging, such that an end-
use, retail consumer could assemble the completed product with no 
additional components. The items may enter the United States in one 
or in multiple retail packages as long as all of the components are 
imported together.
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under subheadings: 7308.90.3000, 7308.90.6000, and 
7308.90.9590.
    The products subject to the investigation may also enter under 
the following HTSUS subheadings: 7216.91.0010, 7216.91.0090, 
7216.99.0010, 7216.99.0090, 7222.40.6000, 7228.70.6000, 
7301.10.0000, 7301.20.1000, 7301.20.5000, 7308.40.0000, 
7308.90.9530, and 9406.90.0030.
    The HTSUS subheadings above are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes only. The written description of the scope of the 
investigation is dispositive.

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of Investigation
IV. Scope Comments
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
VI. Discussion of the Issues
    General
    Comment 1: Reporting Requirements for U.S. Sales
    Comment 2: Remove Home-Market Projects Outside the Reporting 
Requirements for U.S. Sales in the Constructed Value Profit 
Calculation
    BSM
    Comment 3: Whether BSM Failed To Report Accurate and Reliable 
U.S. Prices, and Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available to BSM
    Comment 4: Whether BSM Should Report the Value of Subject 
Merchandise Through a Section E Questionnaire Response
    Comment 5: Valuation of an Order Associated With Two Different 
Sales
    Comment 6: Whether BSM Double Counted Revenue for an Order
    Comment 7: Alternate Differential Pricing Analysis
    Comment 8: Grant CEP Offset
    Comment 9: CEP Profit Rate Calculation
    Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should Use BSM's Reported Date of 
Sale
    Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Use the Revised Indirect 
Selling Expense Ratio for Components Segment Sales
    Comment 12: BSM's Affiliated Party Input Purchases
    Comment 13: CV Profit Rate Used for BSM
    Comment 14: BSM's Financial Expense Ratio
    Comment 15: Adjustments Required by Mexican Financial Reporting 
Standards (MFRS)
    Comment 16: Application of Partial Facts Available With Adverse 
Inferences
    Corey
    Comment 17: Whether Corey's Hudson Yards Tower A Project Sale 
Fell Within the POI
    Comment 18: Whether To Rescind Voluntary Respondent Treatment of 
Corey
    Comment 19: Adjust Corey's Report Costs To Account for All 
Affiliated Purchases
    Comment 20: Subtract Scrap Revenue From Total Cost of 
Manufacturing
VII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2020-01722 Filed 1-29-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.