Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Add New Rule 46B To Permit the Appointment of Regulatory Trading Officials and Amend Rules 47 and 75, 5511-5513 [2020-01646]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
Commission believes that the
information provided by OCC provides
a comprehensive and sufficient
response to the FIA’s request for
clarification.
The Commission believes that OCC’s
proposal with respect to the Operational
Loss Fee will permit OCC to raise
additional equity in the event that its
equity falls close to or below the Target
Capital Requirement and therefore finds
that it is consistent with Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(15)(iii) of the Exchange Act. The
Commission finds, therefore, that
adoption of these aspects of the
proposed Capital Management Policy
and supporting rule changes are
consistent with Exchange Act Rule
17Ad–22(e)(15).127
V. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act, and
in particular, the requirements of
Section 17A of the Exchange Act 128 and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,129
that the Proposed Rule Change (SR–
OCC–2019–007), as modified by Partial
Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is,
approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.130
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01643 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88033; File No. SR–NYSE–
2020–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Add New Rule 46B To Permit the
Appointment of Regulatory Trading
Officials and Amend Rules 47 and 75
January 24, 2020.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
127 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(15).
approving this Proposed Rule Change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rules’
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
129 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
130 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
128 In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
notice is hereby given that, on January
14, 2020, New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes a new Rule
46B to permit the appointment of
Regulatory Trading Officials and
corresponding amendments to Rules 47
and 75 to permit Regulatory Trading
Officials to review whether a bid or offer
was verbalized at the point of sale in
time to be eligible for inclusion in the
Closing Auction. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes a new Rule
46B to permit the appointment of
Regulatory Trading Officials and
corresponding amendments to Rules 47
and 75 to permit Regulatory Trading
Officials to review whether a bid or offer
was verbalized at the point of sale in
time to be eligible for inclusion in the
Closing Auction.
Background
Rule 46 permits the Exchange to
appoint active NYSE members 4 as Floor
4 Rule 2(a) states that the term ‘‘member,’’ when
referring to a natural person, means a natural
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5511
Officials. Rule 46 also permits the
Exchange to appoint ‘‘qualified’’ 5 ICE
employees to act as Floor Governors,
one of the more senior types of Floor
Officials (‘‘Staff Governors’’).6 Floor
Officials are delegated certain authority
from the Board of Directors of the
Exchange to supervise and regulate
active openings and unusual situations
that arise in connection with the making
of bids, offers or transactions on the
Trading Floor,7 and to review and
approve certain trading actions.
Currently, only Floor Officials are
authorized to act under the Exchange’s
rules in connection with certain
situations involving bids, offers or
transactions on the Trading Floor.
Specifically, Rule 75 (Disputes as to
Bids and Offers) mandates that disputes
arising on bids or offers that are not
settled by agreement between the
interested members shall be settled by a
Floor Official. Under Rule 47 (Floor
Officials—Unusual Situations), Floor
Officials have the authority to
‘‘supervise and regulate active openings
and unusual situations that may arise in
connection with the making of bids,
offers or transactions on the Floor.’’
Unusual situations may arise that
could impede or prevent Floor brokers
from representing customer interest
before the end of Core Trading Hours.8
In the event of such a potentially
unusual situation,9 a Floor broker may
person associated with a member organization who
has been approved by the Exchange and designated
by such member organization to effect transactions
on the Exchange Trading Floor or any facility
thereof. See also note 7, infra.
5 Supplementary Material .10 defines ‘‘qualified’’
employees as ‘‘employees of ICE or any of its
subsidiaries, excluding employees of NYSE
Regulation, Inc., who shall have satisfied any
applicable testing or qualification required by the
NYSE for all Floor Governors.’’
6 Pursuant to Rules 46 and 46A, Floor Governors
are one of several ranks of the broader category of
Floor Officials, including, in order of increasing
seniority, Floor Officials, Senior Floor Officials,
Executive Floor Officials, Floor Governors and
Executive Floor Governors. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 57627 (April 4, 2008), 73 FR 19919
(April 11, 2008) (SR–NYSE–2008–19).
7 The term ‘‘Trading Floor’’ is defined in Rule 6A
to mean the restricted-access physical areas
designated by the Exchange for the trading of
securities, commonly known as the ‘‘Main Room’’
and the ‘‘Buttonwood Room.’’
8 See NYSE Rule 52. Core Trading Hours are
defined in Rule 1.1(d) to mean the hours of 9:30
a.m. ET through 4:00 p.m. ET, or such other hours
as may be determined by the Exchange, for
example, an early scheduled closing time.
9 Unusual situations may arise, for example, if the
Floor broker hand-held device malfunctions or
ceases to work or if a Floor broker is physically
impeded, as a result of a crowd condition beyond
that of normal traffic flow on the Exchange’s trading
Floor or some other circumstance beyond the Floor
broker’s control, in his or her ability to be present
at a post before the DMM closes the security. See
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
Continued
30JAN1
5512
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
consult with a Floor Official and the
Designated Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’) in
the relevant security regarding whether
and how that customer interest can be
represented so that it is eligible to
participate in the Closing Auction.10
The Floor Official’s role in this
consultation is to provide an impartial
professional assessment of the situation
consistent with NYSE Rule 47.
Currently, the DMM makes the final
determination whether to include or
exclude Floor broker verbal interest in
the Closing Auction.
Proposed Rule Change
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange proposes a new
‘‘Regulatory Trading Official’’ that may
be consulted regarding whether a bid or
offer was verbalized at the point of sale
in time to be eligible for inclusion in the
Closing Auction by the DMM.
Under proposed Rule 46B, Regulatory
Trading Officials would be an Exchange
employee or officer designated by the
Chief Regulatory Officer or its designee
to perform the functions specified in
Exchange rules. As proposed,
Regulatory Trading Officials would have
the authority to review whether a bid or
offer was verbalized at the point of sale
in time to be eligible for inclusion in the
Closing Auction. The final
determination to include or exclude
verbal interest from the Closing Auction
will be made by the DMM pursuant to
Rule 104. Floor Officials would retain
the authority to settle disputes arising
on bids or offers for all transactions on
the Exchange other than the Closing
Auction.
The Exchange believes that it is more
appropriate for a regulatory employee to
consult with a Floor broker and DMM
relating to the timely entry of verbal
interest in the Closing Auction. Whether
a bid or offer was verbalized at the point
of sale in time to be eligible for
inclusion in the Closing Auction will
often require assessing whether a Floor
broker complied with the rules for entry
of verbal interest prior to the Closing
NYSE Member Education Bulletin 19–01 (June 21,
2019).
10 Floor broker buy and sell interest is eligible to
participate in the Closing Auction if, by the end of
Core Trading Hours, such interest is (1) entered into
an Exchange system and recorded in accordance
with Rule 123(e), and (2) either entered
electronically or verbally represented at the point
of sale. When verbally representing customer
interest, Floor brokers must bid or offer by
articulating the following elements: Symbol, side
(buy or sell), size, and, if the order is a limit order,
the price. See Member Education Bulletin 19–01
(June 21, 2019); see generally Rule 123(b) (record of
orders must contain the required terms of the order,
including the name and amount of the security, the
terms of the order and the time when such order
was received).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
Auction.11 The Exchange believes that
having a regulatory employee involved
in such discussions will emphasize the
importance of including verbal interest
entered in a timely manner in the
closing auction.
To effectuate these changes, the
Exchange proposes a new Rule 46B that
would provide that a Regulatory
Trading Official would be an Exchange
employee or officer designated by the
Chief Regulatory Officer or its designee
to perform those functions specified in
Exchange rules.
The Exchange further proposes to
amend Rule 47 to specify that, whether
a bid or offer was verbalized at the point
of sale in time to be eligible for
inclusion in the Closing Auction by a
DMM, would be governed by Rule 75(b).
The proposed changes to Rule 75 would
separate the current rule text into two
sections. First, the existing text of Rule
75 relating to the authority of Floor
Officials to resolve disputes between
members arising on bids or offers would
be renumbered as new subsection (a)(1)
and the existing text of Supplementary
Material .10 would be renumbered as
new subsection (a)(2). The Exchange
proposes no substantive changes to the
existing text of Rule 75 or current
Supplementary Material .10.
The proposed authority of Regulatory
Trading Officials would be set forth in
a new subsection (b) to Rule 75.
Proposed Rule 75(b) would provide that
a Regulatory Trading Official may be
consulted regarding whether a bid or
offer was verbalized at the point of sale
in time to be eligible for inclusion in the
Closing Auction by the DMM. The
proposed rule would provide that either
the Floor broker with the verbal interest
or the DMM responsible for the Closing
Auction in the relevant security may
request Regulatory Trading Official
review. Proposed Rule 75(b) would also
provide that if such a request has been
made, the DMM will not facilitate the
Closing Auction until a Regulatory
Trading Official has completed his or
her review. Finally, the proposed rule
would provide, consistent with current
rules, that the final determination to
include or exclude verbal interest from
the Closing Auction will be made by the
DMM pursuant to Rule 104.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,12 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,13 in particular, because it is
11 See
note 10, supra.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
14 For example, the pricing and valuation of
certain indices, funds, and derivative products
require primary market prints.
12 15
PO 00000
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest.
In particular, the Exchange believes
that creating a new category of trading
official to review whether a bid or offer
was verbalized in time to be included in
the Closing Auction would promote just
and equitable principles of trade and
remove impediments to a free and open
market by providing additional certainty
to the Closing Auction when a dispute
arises, thereby facilitating fair
competition among brokers and dealers
and among exchange markets. The
Exchange’s Closing Auction is a
recognized industry reference point,14
and the Exchange believes that having a
regulatory employee review whether
verbal interest was correctly and timely
entered at the end of the trading day
would promote the efficient execution
of the Closing Auction, thereby
contributing to fair and orderly markets
and strengthening investor confidence
in the market.
The Exchange believes that assigning
responsibility for reviewing whether
verbal interest was eligible for inclusion
in the Closing Auction to a regulatory
employee designated by the Chief
Regulatory Officer will contribute to the
protection of investors and the public
interest. As noted above, the Exchange
believes that regulatory employees are
appropriately suited to the role of
consultation regarding entry of verbal
interest in time to participate in the
Closing Auction. The Exchange also
believes the proposed amendments
further the goal of transparency and add
clarity to the Exchange’s rules, which
would not be inconsistent with the
public interest and the protection of
investors because investors would not
be harmed and in fact would benefit
from the increased transparency and
clarity in the Exchange’s rules, thereby
reducing potential confusion.
For the foregoing reasons, the
Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
proposed rule change is not designed to
address and competitive issues, but
rather assign responsibility for
reviewing eligibility of verbal interest
for inclusion in the Closing Auction to
a regulatory employee. Since the
proposal does not substantively modify
the Closing Auction or system
functionality, the proposed changes will
not impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, or such longer period up to 90
days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2020–03 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2020–03. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2020–03 and should
be submitted on or before February 20,
2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01646 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. SIPA–180A; File No. SIPC–
2019–01]
Securities Investor Protection
Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Bylaw Change, as Revised
by Amendment No. 1, Relating to SIPC
Board Compensation; Correction
Pursuant to Section 3(e)(1) of the
Securities Investor Protection Act of
1970 (‘‘SIPA’’),1 on October 8, 2019 the
Securities Investor Protection
Corporation (‘‘SIPC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed bylaw
change relating to the SIPC Board of
Directors’ (‘‘Board’’) compensation. On
October 24, 2019, SIPC consented to a
90-day extension of time before the
proposed bylaw change would take
effect pursuant to section 3(e)(1) of
15 17
1 15
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
SIPA.2 On November 19, 2019, SIPC
filed a revised version of the proposed
bylaw change, which replaced and
superseded the original proposed bylaw
change in its entirety. On December 10,
2019, SIPC consented to a 90-day
extension of time before the proposed
bylaw change, as revised by
Amendment No. 1, would take effect
pursuant to section 3(e)(1) of SIPA.3
Pursuant to section 3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA,
the Commission finds that the proposed
bylaw change, as revised by
Amendment No. 1, involves a matter of
such significant public interest that
public comment should be obtained.4
Therefore, pursuant to section 3(e)(2)(A)
of SIPA,5 the Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comment from
interested persons on the proposed
bylaw change, as revised by
Amendment No. 1.6
In its filing with the Commission,
SIPC included statements concerning
the purpose of and statutory basis for
the proposed bylaw change, as revised
by Amendment No. 1, as described
below, which description has been
substantially prepared by SIPC.
I. SIPC’s Statement of the Purpose of,
and Statutory Basis for, Proposed SIPC
Bylaw Change Relating to SIPC Board
Compensation
On October 7, 2019, pursuant to
Section 3(e)(1) of SIPA, 15 U.S.C.
78ccc(e)(1),7 SIPC submitted for filing
with the Commission a proposed
amendment to Article 2, Section 6, of
the SIPC Bylaws. On November 18,
2019, SIPC submitted a revised version
of the proposed amendment to Article 2,
Section 6, of the SIPC Bylaws. Article 2,
Section 6, of the Bylaws relates to the
honoraria paid to non-Governmental
members of the Board.
As amended, Article 2, Section 6,
would: (1) Change the Board
Chairperson’s yearly honorarium from
2 Id.
3 Id.
4 15
January 24, 2020.
Sfmt 4703
5513
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2)(A).
6 This notice of SIPC’s filing of a proposed bylaw
change, as revised by Amendment No. 1, relating
to SIPC Board compensation, supersedes the notice
originally published in the Federal Register on
January 23, 2020. See Securities Investor Protection
Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Bylaw
Change, as Revised by Amendment No. 1, Relating
to SIPC Board Compensation, Release No. SIPA–180
(Jan. 16, 2020), 85 FR 3960 (Jan. 23, 2020). The
notice published on January 23, 2020 inadvertently
referenced a provision from the original version of
the proposed bylaw change that would have
provided for a re-evaluation of Board honoraria
every ten years. SIPC’s proposed bylaw change, as
revised by Amendment No. 1, does not propose a
re-evaluation of Board honoraria every ten years.
7 For convenience, reference hereinafter to
provisions of SIPA shall be to the United States
Code and shall omit ‘‘15 U.S.C.’’.
5 15
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5511-5513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01646]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88033; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Add New Rule 46B To Permit
the Appointment of Regulatory Trading Officials and Amend Rules 47 and
75
January 24, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby given
that, on January 14, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes a new Rule 46B to permit the appointment of
Regulatory Trading Officials and corresponding amendments to Rules 47
and 75 to permit Regulatory Trading Officials to review whether a bid
or offer was verbalized at the point of sale in time to be eligible for
inclusion in the Closing Auction. The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes a new Rule 46B to permit the appointment of
Regulatory Trading Officials and corresponding amendments to Rules 47
and 75 to permit Regulatory Trading Officials to review whether a bid
or offer was verbalized at the point of sale in time to be eligible for
inclusion in the Closing Auction.
Background
Rule 46 permits the Exchange to appoint active NYSE members \4\ as
Floor Officials. Rule 46 also permits the Exchange to appoint
``qualified'' \5\ ICE employees to act as Floor Governors, one of the
more senior types of Floor Officials (``Staff Governors'').\6\ Floor
Officials are delegated certain authority from the Board of Directors
of the Exchange to supervise and regulate active openings and unusual
situations that arise in connection with the making of bids, offers or
transactions on the Trading Floor,\7\ and to review and approve certain
trading actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Rule 2(a) states that the term ``member,'' when referring to
a natural person, means a natural person associated with a member
organization who has been approved by the Exchange and designated by
such member organization to effect transactions on the Exchange
Trading Floor or any facility thereof. See also note 7, infra.
\5\ Supplementary Material .10 defines ``qualified'' employees
as ``employees of ICE or any of its subsidiaries, excluding
employees of NYSE Regulation, Inc., who shall have satisfied any
applicable testing or qualification required by the NYSE for all
Floor Governors.''
\6\ Pursuant to Rules 46 and 46A, Floor Governors are one of
several ranks of the broader category of Floor Officials, including,
in order of increasing seniority, Floor Officials, Senior Floor
Officials, Executive Floor Officials, Floor Governors and Executive
Floor Governors. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57627
(April 4, 2008), 73 FR 19919 (April 11, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-19).
\7\ The term ``Trading Floor'' is defined in Rule 6A to mean the
restricted-access physical areas designated by the Exchange for the
trading of securities, commonly known as the ``Main Room'' and the
``Buttonwood Room.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, only Floor Officials are authorized to act under the
Exchange's rules in connection with certain situations involving bids,
offers or transactions on the Trading Floor. Specifically, Rule 75
(Disputes as to Bids and Offers) mandates that disputes arising on bids
or offers that are not settled by agreement between the interested
members shall be settled by a Floor Official. Under Rule 47 (Floor
Officials--Unusual Situations), Floor Officials have the authority to
``supervise and regulate active openings and unusual situations that
may arise in connection with the making of bids, offers or transactions
on the Floor.''
Unusual situations may arise that could impede or prevent Floor
brokers from representing customer interest before the end of Core
Trading Hours.\8\ In the event of such a potentially unusual
situation,\9\ a Floor broker may
[[Page 5512]]
consult with a Floor Official and the Designated Market Maker (``DMM'')
in the relevant security regarding whether and how that customer
interest can be represented so that it is eligible to participate in
the Closing Auction.\10\ The Floor Official's role in this consultation
is to provide an impartial professional assessment of the situation
consistent with NYSE Rule 47. Currently, the DMM makes the final
determination whether to include or exclude Floor broker verbal
interest in the Closing Auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See NYSE Rule 52. Core Trading Hours are defined in Rule
1.1(d) to mean the hours of 9:30 a.m. ET through 4:00 p.m. ET, or
such other hours as may be determined by the Exchange, for example,
an early scheduled closing time.
\9\ Unusual situations may arise, for example, if the Floor
broker hand-held device malfunctions or ceases to work or if a Floor
broker is physically impeded, as a result of a crowd condition
beyond that of normal traffic flow on the Exchange's trading Floor
or some other circumstance beyond the Floor broker's control, in his
or her ability to be present at a post before the DMM closes the
security. See NYSE Member Education Bulletin 19-01 (June 21, 2019).
\10\ Floor broker buy and sell interest is eligible to
participate in the Closing Auction if, by the end of Core Trading
Hours, such interest is (1) entered into an Exchange system and
recorded in accordance with Rule 123(e), and (2) either entered
electronically or verbally represented at the point of sale. When
verbally representing customer interest, Floor brokers must bid or
offer by articulating the following elements: Symbol, side (buy or
sell), size, and, if the order is a limit order, the price. See
Member Education Bulletin 19-01 (June 21, 2019); see generally Rule
123(b) (record of orders must contain the required terms of the
order, including the name and amount of the security, the terms of
the order and the time when such order was received).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes a new ``Regulatory Trading Official'' that
may be consulted regarding whether a bid or offer was verbalized at the
point of sale in time to be eligible for inclusion in the Closing
Auction by the DMM.
Under proposed Rule 46B, Regulatory Trading Officials would be an
Exchange employee or officer designated by the Chief Regulatory Officer
or its designee to perform the functions specified in Exchange rules.
As proposed, Regulatory Trading Officials would have the authority to
review whether a bid or offer was verbalized at the point of sale in
time to be eligible for inclusion in the Closing Auction. The final
determination to include or exclude verbal interest from the Closing
Auction will be made by the DMM pursuant to Rule 104. Floor Officials
would retain the authority to settle disputes arising on bids or offers
for all transactions on the Exchange other than the Closing Auction.
The Exchange believes that it is more appropriate for a regulatory
employee to consult with a Floor broker and DMM relating to the timely
entry of verbal interest in the Closing Auction. Whether a bid or offer
was verbalized at the point of sale in time to be eligible for
inclusion in the Closing Auction will often require assessing whether a
Floor broker complied with the rules for entry of verbal interest prior
to the Closing Auction.\11\ The Exchange believes that having a
regulatory employee involved in such discussions will emphasize the
importance of including verbal interest entered in a timely manner in
the closing auction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See note 10, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To effectuate these changes, the Exchange proposes a new Rule 46B
that would provide that a Regulatory Trading Official would be an
Exchange employee or officer designated by the Chief Regulatory Officer
or its designee to perform those functions specified in Exchange rules.
The Exchange further proposes to amend Rule 47 to specify that,
whether a bid or offer was verbalized at the point of sale in time to
be eligible for inclusion in the Closing Auction by a DMM, would be
governed by Rule 75(b). The proposed changes to Rule 75 would separate
the current rule text into two sections. First, the existing text of
Rule 75 relating to the authority of Floor Officials to resolve
disputes between members arising on bids or offers would be renumbered
as new subsection (a)(1) and the existing text of Supplementary
Material .10 would be renumbered as new subsection (a)(2). The Exchange
proposes no substantive changes to the existing text of Rule 75 or
current Supplementary Material .10.
The proposed authority of Regulatory Trading Officials would be set
forth in a new subsection (b) to Rule 75. Proposed Rule 75(b) would
provide that a Regulatory Trading Official may be consulted regarding
whether a bid or offer was verbalized at the point of sale in time to
be eligible for inclusion in the Closing Auction by the DMM. The
proposed rule would provide that either the Floor broker with the
verbal interest or the DMM responsible for the Closing Auction in the
relevant security may request Regulatory Trading Official review.
Proposed Rule 75(b) would also provide that if such a request has been
made, the DMM will not facilitate the Closing Auction until a
Regulatory Trading Official has completed his or her review. Finally,
the proposed rule would provide, consistent with current rules, that
the final determination to include or exclude verbal interest from the
Closing Auction will be made by the DMM pursuant to Rule 104.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes that creating a new category
of trading official to review whether a bid or offer was verbalized in
time to be included in the Closing Auction would promote just and
equitable principles of trade and remove impediments to a free and open
market by providing additional certainty to the Closing Auction when a
dispute arises, thereby facilitating fair competition among brokers and
dealers and among exchange markets. The Exchange's Closing Auction is a
recognized industry reference point,\14\ and the Exchange believes that
having a regulatory employee review whether verbal interest was
correctly and timely entered at the end of the trading day would
promote the efficient execution of the Closing Auction, thereby
contributing to fair and orderly markets and strengthening investor
confidence in the market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ For example, the pricing and valuation of certain indices,
funds, and derivative products require primary market prints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that assigning responsibility for reviewing
whether verbal interest was eligible for inclusion in the Closing
Auction to a regulatory employee designated by the Chief Regulatory
Officer will contribute to the protection of investors and the public
interest. As noted above, the Exchange believes that regulatory
employees are appropriately suited to the role of consultation
regarding entry of verbal interest in time to participate in the
Closing Auction. The Exchange also believes the proposed amendments
further the goal of transparency and add clarity to the Exchange's
rules, which would not be inconsistent with the public interest and the
protection of investors because investors would not be harmed and in
fact would benefit from the increased transparency and clarity in the
Exchange's rules, thereby reducing potential confusion.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The
[[Page 5513]]
proposed rule change is not designed to address and competitive issues,
but rather assign responsibility for reviewing eligibility of verbal
interest for inclusion in the Closing Auction to a regulatory employee.
Since the proposal does not substantively modify the Closing Auction or
system functionality, the proposed changes will not impose any burden
on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, or such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2020-03 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-03 and should be submitted on
or before February 20, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-01646 Filed 1-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P