Securities Investor Protection Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC Member Assessments; Correction, 5519-5525 [2020-01610]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of
FINRA. All comments received will be
posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2020–002 and should be submitted on
or before February 20, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01648 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. SIPA–179A; File No. SIPC–
2019–02]
Securities Investor Protection
Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to
SIPC Member Assessments;
Correction
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
January 24, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 3(e)(1) of the
Securities Investor Protection Act of
1970 (‘‘SIPA’’),1 on November 19, 2019
the Securities Investor Protection
Corporation (‘‘SIPC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) proposed bylaw
changes relating to SIPC member
assessments. On December 10, 2019,
SIPC consented to a 90-day extension of
time before the proposed bylaw changes
would take effect pursuant to section
3(e)(1) of SIPA.2 Pursuant to section
3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA, the Commission finds
that these proposed bylaw changes
involve a matter of such significant
public interest that public comment
should be obtained.3 Therefore,
18 17
1 15
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
2 Id.
3 15
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
5519
pursuant to section 3(e)(2)(A) of SIPA,4
the Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comment from
interested persons on the proposed
bylaw changes.5
In its filing with the Commission,
SIPC included statements concerning
the purpose of and statutory basis for
the proposed bylaw changes as
described below, which description has
been substantially prepared by SIPC.
increase or decrease, within certain
limits, the appropriate assessment rate
in order to maintain the Fund and effect
SIPA’s purposes.
Pursuant to SIPA Section 78ddd(c)(2),
SIPC has consulted with self-regulatory
organizations with respect to the
proposed amendments. SIPC has
determined that the changes are
necessary and appropriate to maintain
the SIPC Fund.
I. SIPC’s Statement of the Purpose of,
and Statutory Basis for, SIPC Proposed
Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC
Member Assessments
Pursuant to Section 3(e)(1) of SIPA, 15
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1),6 SIPC hereby submits
for filing with the Commission proposed
amendments to Article 6 of the SIPC
Bylaws (‘‘Bylaws’’). Article 6 relates to
the assessments that SIPC imposes upon
its members.
As revised, Article 6 would maintain
assessments at the current rate of 0.15
percent of a member’s net operating
revenue from the securities business
until SIPC’s unrestricted net assets
reach $5 billion.7 ‘‘Unrestricted net
assets’’ are comprised primarily of the
amount in the SIPC Fund at year end,
minus the estimated cost to complete
pending liquidation proceedings, as
reflected in SIPC’s most recent audited
Statement of Financial Position. Once
the aforementioned condition is met,
SIPC would commission a study to
consider the adequacy of the SIPC Fund,
and would do so every four years
thereafter. The study would analyze a
variety of factors, as set forth in the
proposed amended Bylaw. After
consideration of the study and the
report thereon, and after consultation
with the Commission and selfregulatory organizations, SIPC could
Background
SIPC is a non-profit member
organization created in 1970 under
SIPA, for the protection of customers of
member broker-dealers placed in
liquidation under SIPA. With some
exceptions set by statute, all registered
securities brokers or dealers are
members of SIPC. SIPC protects the
customers of member firms in
liquidation under SIPA. Among other
things, SIPC advances funds to satisfy
the claims of customers. Each customer
is protected by SIPC up to $500,000
against the loss of missing cash and/or
securities entrusted by the customer to
the broker. The $500,000 includes a
limit of up to $250,000 where the
allowed claim is for cash only. The
advances by SIPC come from a ‘‘Fund’’
that SIPC administers. The Fund largely
is comprised of assessments paid to
SIPC by its members. The Fund also is
used to pay the administrative expenses
of a liquidation proceeding where the
debtor’s general estate is insufficient,
and to finance the day-to-day operations
of SIPC.
4 15
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2)(A).
notice of SIPC’s filing of proposed bylaw
changes relating to SIPC member assessments
supersedes the notice originally published in the
Federal Register on January 23, 2020. See Securities
Investor Protection Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC Member
Assessments, Release No. SIPA–179 (Jan. 16, 2020),
85 FR 3986 (Jan. 23, 2020). The notice published
on January 23, 2020 inadvertently omitted from the
‘‘Text of the Proposed Bylaw Change’’ section
deleted text in paragraph (g) of Section 1 of Article
6 of the SIPC bylaws defining ‘‘net operating
revenues from the securities business.’’ This notice
reflects that the definition would remain the same
but would move from paragraph (g) of Section 1 of
Article 6 of the SIPC bylaws to paragraph (b)(ii) of
Section 3 of Article 6 of the SIPC bylaws.
6 For convenience, references hereinafter to
provisions of SIPA shall be to the United States
Code and shall omit ‘‘15 U.S.C.’’
7 ‘‘Net operating revenues from the securities
business’’ is ‘‘gross revenues from the securities
business less interest and dividend expenses, and
includes those clarifications as are set forth in the
SIPC assessment forms and instructions.’’ SIPC
Bylaw Article 6, Section 1(a)(3)(g) [sic].
5 This
PO 00000
Frm 00153
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Assessment Bylaw
Article 6 of the Bylaws now imposes
a yearly assessment rate of 0.15% of net
operating revenues from the member’s
securities business (‘‘NOR’’) where the
balance of the SIPC Fund is less than
$2.5 billion and will remain at that
amount for six months or more. If the
SIPC Fund has reached $2.5 billion but
SIPC’s unrestricted net asset amount is
less than $2.5 billion, then the yearly
assessment rate is .15% of NOR. Once
the unrestricted net assets total at least
$2.5 billion, then the assessment rate is
a minimum assessment of .02% of NOR.
Currently, SIPC’s only sources of
funding are its Fund and a possible
Government loan. To ensure that SIPC
has sufficient independent resources to
carry out its purposes (thus obviating
the need to borrow from the Federal
Government), SIPC has determined to
keep the assessment rate at 0.15% of
NOR until SIPC’s unrestricted net assets
total $5 billion. This will accomplish a
few things: (1) Provide a larger cushion
for unknown contingencies; (2) reduce
the potential volatility of member
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
5520
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
Basis and Purpose of Proposed Changes
There is no scientific basis for
determining the exact adequacy of the
SIPC Fund. Nevertheless, SIPC’s
statutory obligation to protect customers
of failed firms, and in certain cases, to
pay the costs and expenses of
administration of the liquidation
proceeding, impose upon SIPC a duty to
take a responsible approach to
calculating both the size of the SIPC
Fund, and the reasonableness of an
assessment rate that maintains and
promotes adequate funding.
regarding the uncertainties in an everchanging marketplace, SIPC believes
that in order for its mission of customer
protection to succeed, SIPC must
maintain a robust Fund.
Historical Perspective
The initial SIPC Fund totaled $77.6
million.8 In 1992, SIPC’s Board (‘‘the
Board’’) raised the target balance of the
SIPC Fund to $1 billion, and the SIPC
Fund reached that amount in 1996. The
Board last sought to augment the size of
the Fund in 2009, when, following the
commencement of the liquidation
proceedings of Lehman Brothers Inc.
(‘‘LBI’’), and Bernard L. Madoff
Investment Securities LLC (‘‘BLMIS’’),
the assessment rate was revised to cause
the Fund to grow to $2.5 billion.
The financial crisis of 2008, and the
ensuing liquidation proceedings of LBI
and BLMIS, revealed clearly the need
for SIPC to increase the Fund balance.
Although the LBI liquidation
proceeding ultimately did not require
SIPC to advance funds to satisfy claims,
or pay for expenses of administration,
any future failure of a global enterprise
and its broker-dealer affiliate could have
a very different outcome for SIPC. For
example, had funds sought by LBI been
encumbered overseas, or had LBI been
reducing artificially its segregated
customer reserve requirement through
otherwise legal complex transactions,
that may have imposed significant
demands on the SIPC Fund.
The liquidation proceeding of BLMIS
has required SIPC to make the largest
aggregate advance in its history. In
statistical terms, the amount is more
than 100 standard deviations greater
than the amounts advanced by SIPC in
all of its previous cases.10 Today, an
event statistically comparable to BLMIS
would require advances to customers
amounting to between $4 billion and $5
billion.
SIPC faces risks beyond those posed
by large Ponzi schemes or a credit crisis.
These additional risks, many of which
are hard to quantify, include, for
example, technology-related failures,
such as a cyberattack on a large SIPC
member that restricts access by
customers to their assets; or risks
stemming from the delay in computing
a broker-dealer’s reserve requirement.
For example, SEC Rule 15c3–3, 17 CFR
240.15c3–3, which governs the
protection of customer assets, requires a
broker-dealer to compute its cash
reserve requirement on a weekly, not
daily, basis. Although a number of SIPC
members voluntarily rebalance their
cash reserves on a daily basis, a large
SIPC member that does not might not
have enough cash in its Rule 15c3–3(e)
reserve account due to an increase in its
net cash obligations following its last
required reserve computation.
Another factor underscoring SIPC
concerns is the potential risk to the
solvency of the SIPC Fund under the
Orderly Liquidation provisions of the
Dodd Frank Act, Title II. Dodd-Frank
creates an important role for SIPC in the
event of the failure of a covered, large
complex securities broker-dealer that
presents systemic risk. Under DoddFrank, SIPC is designated as trustee for
the liquidation of the broker-dealer
under SIPA. 12 U.S.C. 5385(A). As
trustee, SIPC must determine and satisfy
claims against the broker-dealer
consistent with SIPA. 12 U.S.C. 5385(D).
While the FDIC has expressed a
preference to use Dodd-Frank to
intervene at the holding company
level,11 the law nevertheless remains
available to liquidate a systemically
important broker-dealer.
8 Comprised of member assessments of $9.6
million, the transfer of $3 million from the
American Stock Exchange, Inc. trust fund, and
confirmed lines of credit totaling $65 million.
9 SIPC’s last credit agreement, a $500 million, 3yr. revolving credit facility, expired March 1, 2010.
10 In addition, the amounts advanced by SIPC in
the BLMIS liquidation are more than 107 times
greater than the average advance of the ten next
largest SIPC cases.
11 Resolution of Systemically Important Financial
Institutions: The Single Point of Entry Strategy, 78
FR 76614 (Dec. 18, 2013).
As the graph above reveals, before the
liquidation of BLMIS in 2008, SIPC’s
Fund balance had doubled roughly
every ten years. In addition, during
those years and until 2010, SIPC had a
substantial confirmed private line of
credit.9 Due to the high cost and/or
unavailability, SIPC no longer has the
private line of credit.
The Risk Landscape
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
As SIPC has witnessed over the past
decade, risks abound—from a large firm
failure with encumbered assets, to a
Ponzi scheme with significant losses to
customers, to risks presented by a
cybersecurity attack or the use of digital
assets. Assessing the adequacy of the
Fund is especially challenging because
the cost of a liquidation does not
necessarily correlate with any
traditional measure of financial
exposure for broker-dealers. Instead, the
Fund’s adequacy depends largely on
member firms’ compliance with
customer protection or net capital rules,
the probability of which is challenging
to quantify.
SIPC’s resources must enhance
investor confidence. Given the risks
described above, and remaining vigilant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00154
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Mechanism for Setting the Assessment
Rate
Once the unrestricted net asset
amount is $5 billion, SIPC would, as it
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
EN30JA20.000
assessments during periods of economic
downturn or individual member crisis;
and (3) promote sound financial
management in light of SIPC’s statutory
mission.
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
often has in the past,12 commission a
study to review the adequacy of the
SIPC Fund. In the ordinary course, SIPC
would commission the study every four
years. The study would entail
consideration of such factors as the
overall state of the SIPC Fund, current
and projected financial market
conditions and trends, historic and
perceived risks and threats to the
viability of the SIPC Fund, any undue
burden on members, or members’
customers, and other factors deemed
appropriate by the SIPC Board.
Upon consideration of the results of
the study and the report thereon that
would issue, and after consultation with
the Commission and one or more selfregulatory organizations, SIPC would set
the appropriate assessment rate
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
12 At various times, the size of SIPC’s Fund has
been independently reviewed. See, e.g., GAO
Report, The Regulatory Framework Has Minimized
SIPC’s Losses, September 1992; Review of SIPC Risk
Profile and Practices, Fitch Risk Management, 2003;
Loss Modeling and Capital Reserve Adequacy
Study, Algorithmics Inc., 2008; Task Force
Recommendation Analysis: Methodology and
Summary of Results, Opera Solutions LLC, 2013.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
necessary to maintain the Fund and
satisfy SIPA’s purposes.
Other provisions of SIPC Bylaw
Article 6 are unchanged such as the rate
when the Fund is less than $150
million, or less than $100 million, or the
circumstances under which the rate
imposed can be more than 1⁄2 of 1% of
gross revenues from the securities
business but not more than 1%
thereof.13 These provisions largely track
the requirements under SIPA Sections
78ddd(c)(3)(B) and 78ddd(d)(1)(A) and
B.
Given not only the risks described
above, but the risk to members that, by
statute, a significant event could cause
assessment rates immediately to jump to
at least 0.50% of gross revenues from
the securities business and possibly be
as high as 1%, SIPC submits that
growing the Fund at a consistent pace
lessens any negative impact on
members, with the attendant benefit of
reaching $5 billion sooner. Barring
13 ‘‘Gross revenues from the securities business’’
is defined in SIPA Section 78lll(9).
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5521
unforeseen sizeable expenditures, SIPC
estimates that at the current yearly
assessment rate of .15% of NOR, SIPC’s
unrestricted net assets, as reflected in
SIPC’s audited Statement of Financial
Position, would be $5 billion by no later
than December 31, 2026. If SIPC did
nothing to address the adequacy of the
Fund or the assessment rate, then at a
rate of 0.02% per annum, which would
be the assessment under the current
version of the Assessment Bylaw, the $5
billion balance would not be reached
until the year 2040.
Impact on Members
Adopting the modifications proposed
by SIPC should have a limited impact
on member firms. As the chart below
reveals, based on 2018 data, SIPC staff
estimates that two-thirds of the total
difference in annual assessments under
the proposed assessment rate structure
would be paid by only 30 members for
which the difference in the assessment
payment would amount, on average,
only to .091% of their total revenue.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
5522
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–C
In the above chart, column 1 refers to
the difference in amount that a brokerdealer would pay as a result of being
assessed at a rate of .15% instead of
.02%. Column 2 is the number of
broker-dealers impacted at that amount.
Column 3 is the percentage that the
broker-dealers at a certain level
represent relative to the total number of
broker-dealers. Column 4 is the total
additional amount paid by all brokerdealers at a given level. Column 5 is the
percentage that the payments reflect
relative to all payments. Column 6 is the
percentage that the payments represent,
on average, relative to the brokerdealers’ revenue.
Thus, an assessment rate of .15%, as
opposed to .02%, would cause the
largest 30 SIPC members to pay
approximately $172 million more out of
their approximately $213 billion in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
revenue. This increase amounts to
approximately 8/100 of 1% of such
members’ revenue, and represents 2⁄3 of
the total impact on all members. More
than half of SIPC members would see an
increase of less than $2,500 in the
amount of their annual assessment, with
more than 20% of members paying a
difference of less than $100. In other
words, the impact of modifying the
assessment structure on both the total
assessment burden, and the distribution
of the assessment burden, among
individual broker-dealers, would be
comparatively limited.
Proposed Technical Changes
Clarification of Role of Collection Agent
In addition to the above, SIPC
proposes to amend that portion of the
Assessment Bylaw relating to Collection
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of General Assessments (SIPC Bylaw
Article 6, Section 1(c)).
Under SIPA Section 78iii(a), each selfregulatory organization (‘‘SRO’’) may act
as the collection agent for SIPC to
collect assessments payable by members
for which the SRO is the examining
authority. However, SIPA does not
mandate that SIPC use a collection agent
to collect assessments, and SIPA does
not restrict collection exclusively to
collection agents. See, e.g., SIPA Section
78ddd(c)(1) (‘‘Each member of SIPC
shall pay to SIPC, or the collection agent
for SIPC . . . .[emphasis added]’’).
Furthermore, under SIPA Section
78ccc(b)(8), since SIPC has the power to
‘‘do any and all other acts and things as
may be necessary or incidental to the
conduct of its business and the exercise
of all other rights and powers granted to
SIPC,’’ SIPC has the general authority
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
EN30JA20.001
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
directly to collect assessments. Indeed,
for more than 20 years—since the mid1990s—members have paid assessments
directly to SIPC. Where members have
failed to pay their assessments, SIPC has
referred the delinquency to Commission
staff and currently brings the matter to
the attention of FINRA for collection.
In keeping with current practice, and
in light of technological developments
and capabilities that have continued to
improve considerably, the proposed
bylaw removes the provision that
requires members to pay assessments to
collection agents. The proposed Bylaw
amendment re-letters the provisions that
follow current Bylaw Article 6, Section
1(c). The re-lettered provisions include
current Section 1(d) of Bylaw Article 6
(Report by Collection Agents). Section
1(d) requires the SROs to report in
writing to SIPC as to any member from
which the SRO has or has not been
successful in collecting payment. In this
manner, SIPC can stay informed as to
any member that continues to be
delinquent and refer the member, as
needed, to the Commission for further
action under SIPA Section 78jjj(a).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Elimination of Interest Payment Period
on Past-Due Payments
Currently, the SIPC Bylaw provides
that if a member’s assessment payment
has not been received within 15 days of
the due date, the stated interest rate for
late payments applies to unpaid
amounts. In January, 2019, SIPC
developed an internet payment portal,
whereby members can pay SIPC directly
online. SIPC is also presently working
on the development of a portal through
which, among other things, members
can file assessment forms. The creation
by SIPC of the means by which
members can make immediate payment
obviates the need for a grace period.
Conclusion
Given the many risks that have arisen
in the past two decades, and the
potential risks SIPC continues to face,
SIPC must be prudent in determining
what constitutes a sufficient level of
funding. Indeed, maintaining the
adequacy of the SIPC Fund is in
everyone’s interest—it enhances
investor protection. While SIPC could
raise the assessment on an ad hoc basis
as the situation warrants, it believes that
the approach set forth herein is the
better course of action, as it promotes
greater stability and predictability for
both investors and member firms.
II. Need for Public Comment
Section 3(e)(1) of SIPA provides that
the SIPC Board must file a copy of any
proposed bylaw change with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
Commission, accompanied by a concise
general statement of the basis and
purpose of the proposed bylaw
change.14 The proposed bylaw change
will become effective thirty days after
the date of filing with the Commission
or upon such later date as SIPC may
designate or such earlier date as the
Commission may determine unless: (A)
The Commission, by notice to SIPC
setting forth the reasons for such action,
disapproves the proposed bylaw change
as being contrary to the public interest
or contrary to the purposes of SIPA; or
(B) the Commission finds that the
proposed bylaw change involves a
matter of such significant public interest
that public comment should be
obtained, in which case it may, after
notifying SIPC in writing of such
finding, require that the procedures for
SIPC proposed rule changes in section
3(e)(2) of SIPA be followed with respect
to the proposed bylaw change.15
The SIPC Fund, which is built from
assessments on its members and the
interest earned on the Fund, is used for
the protection of customers of members
liquidated under SIPA to maintain
investor confidence in the securities
markets. In light of this fact and that the
bylaw change provides for a modified
calculation of the assessment rate and a
change to collection practices, the
Commission finds, pursuant to section
3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA,16 that the proposed
bylaw change involves a matter of such
significant public interest that public
comment should be obtained and is
requiring that the procedures applicable
to SIPC proposed rule changes in
section 3(e)(2) of SIPA 17 be followed.
As required by section 3(e)(1)(B) of
SIPA,18 the Commission has notified
SIPC of this finding in writing.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Bylaw Changes and Timing
for Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, or within such longer period
(A) as the Commission may designate of
not more than ninety days after such
date if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons
for so finding or (B) as to which SIPC
consents, the Commission shall: (i) By
order approve such proposed bylaw
changes; or (ii) institute proceedings to
determine whether such proposed
bylaw changes should be disapproved.19
14 15
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
16 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
17 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2).
18 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
19 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2)(B).
15 15
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5523
IV. Text of Proposed Bylaw Change
The text of the proposed bylaw
changes is provided below. Proposed
new language is in italics; proposed
deletions are in brackets.
Article 6
Assessments
Section 1. General
(a) Amount of Assessment
(1) The amount of each member’s
assessment for the member’s fiscal year
shall be the product of the assessment
rate established by SIPC for that fiscal
year and either the member’s gross [or
net ]revenues or net operating revenues
from the securities business, as follows:
(A) [The assessment rate shall be onefourth (1⁄4) of one (1) percent per annum
of net operating revenues from the
member’s securities business for each
calendar year or part thereof unless
SIPC determines that the balance of the
SIPC Fund, as defined in Section 4(a)(2)
of the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines
of credit,] If at any time SIPC determines
that SIPC’s unrestricted net assets are:
(i) Less than $5.0 billion but not less
than $2.5 billion, and are reasonably
likely to remain less than $5.0 billion
but not less than $2.5 billion, the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be 0.15 percent per annum of net
operating revenues from the member’s
securities business for each calendar
year or part thereof. [has aggregated a
balance of $2.5 billion, and]
(ii) less than $2.5 billon, the amount
of each member’s assessment shall be
one-fourth (1⁄4) of one (1) percent per
annum of net operating revenues from
the member’s securities business for
each calendar year or part thereof. [will
remain at or above $2.5 billion for six
months or more.]
(B) Notwithstanding anything herein
to the contrary, if at any time SIPC
determines that the balance of the SIPC
Fund aggregates or is reasonably likely
to aggregate:
(i) Less than $150,000,000—the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined
by SIPC, but in no case shall the amount
of each member’s assessment be less
than an assessment rate of one-fourth
(1⁄4) of one (1) percent per annum of
such member’s gross revenues from the
securities business.
(ii) less than $100,000,000—the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined
by SIPC, but in no case shall the amount
of each member’s assessment be less
than an assessment rate of one-half (1⁄2)
of one (1) percent per annum of such
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
5524
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
member’s gross revenues from the
securities business.
(iii) The amount of each member’s
assessment shall not exceed one-half
(1⁄2) of one (1) percent per annum of
such member’s gross revenues from the
securities business, unless SIPC
determines that a rate in excess of onehalf (1⁄2) of one (1) percent during any
twelve (12) month period will not have
a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of its members or
their customers. No assessment made
pursuant to this section 1(a)(1) shall
require payments during any such
period that exceed in the aggregate one
(1) percent of any member’s gross
revenues from the securities business for
such period.
[Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 1(a)(1)(A) herein, if SIPC
determines that the balance of the SIPC
Fund, as defined in Section 4(a)(2) of
the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of
credit, (i) has aggregated $2.5 billion,
and (ii) will remain at or above $2.5
billion for six months or more, but
SIPC’s unrestricted net assets, as
reflected in SIPC’s most recent audited
Statement of Financial Position, are less
than $2.5 billion, the assessment rate
shall be 0.15 percent per annum of net
operating revenues from the member’s
securities business for each calendar
year or part thereof.]
(C) SIPC shall commission a study
(‘‘Study’’) every four years to examine
the adequacy of the balance of SIPC’s
unrestricted net assets and the SIPC
Fund and the appropriate assessment
rate that is necessary to fulfill the
purposes of the Act. The Study will
examine the overall state of SIPC’s
unrestricted net assets and Fund
balances, current and projected
financial market conditions and trends,
historic and perceived risks and threats
to the viability of SIPC’s unrestricted net
assets and Fund, any undue burden on
members or members’ customers, and
such other factors as the Board
determines. The Study shall result in a
report (‘‘Report’’) to be furnished to
SIPC. The first Study shall be
commissioned when SIPC reasonably
anticipates that SIPC’s unrestricted net
assets have reached a total of $5.0
billion. [If SIPC determines that the
balance of the SIPC Fund, as defined in
Section 4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of
confirmed lines of credit, has aggregated
$2.5 billion or more, and will remain at
or above $2.5 billion for six months or
more, and SIPC’s unrestricted net assets,
as reflected in SIPC’s most recent
audited Statement of Financial Position,
are at or above $2.5 billion, members
shall pay a minimum assessment, which
shall be 0.02 percent of the net
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
operating revenues from the securities
business for each calendar year or part
thereof.]
(D) Without limitation of SIPC’s
authority under 15 U.S.C. 78ccc and
78ddd to set assessments, if SIPC
determines that SIPC’s unrestricted net
assets are $5.0 billion or more and are
reasonably likely to remain above $5.0
billion, and after review of the
information contained in the last Report
at such time, and after consultation with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission and self-regulatory
organizations, SIPC may not more than
once in any four-year period, increase or
decrease the assessment rate by up to,
but not more than, twenty-five percent
(25%) of the rate in effect at that time.
[Anything to the contrary herein
notwithstanding, if at any time SIPC
determines that the balance of the SIPC
Fund, as defined in Section 4(a)(2) of
the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of
credit, aggregates or is reasonably likely
to aggregate:
(i) Less than $2.5 billion and will
likely remain less than $2.5 billion for
a period of six (6) months or more—the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be at an assessment rate of onefourth (1⁄4) of one (1) percent per annum
of net operating revenue.
(ii) less than $150,000,000—the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined
by SIPC, but in no case shall the amount
of each member’s assessment be less
than an assessment rate of one-fourth
(1⁄4) of one (1) percent per annum of
such member’s gross revenues from the
securities business.
(iii) less than $100,000,000—the
amount of each member’s assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined
by SIPC, but in no case shall the amount
of each member’s assessment be less
than an assessment rate of one-half (1⁄2)
of one (1) percent per annum of such
member’s gross revenues from the
securities business.
(iv) The amount of each member’s
assessment shall not exceed one-half
(1⁄2) of one (1) percent per annum of
such member’s gross revenues from the
securities business, unless SIPC
determines that a rate in excess of onehalf (1⁄2) of one (1) percent during any
twelve (12) month period will not have
a material adverse effect on the financial
condition of its members or their
customers. No assessment made
pursuant to this section 1(a)(1) shall
require payments during any such
period that exceed in the aggregate one
(1) percent of any member’s gross
revenues from the securities business
for such period.]
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(E) Any minimum assessment
imposed upon each member of SIPC
shall be 0.02 percent of the net
operating revenues from the securities
business of such member for each
calendar year or part thereof.
(2) Any change in assessments made
in accordance with Section 1(a)(1)
herein shall commence on the first day
of the year following the date on which
SIPC announces its determination, or on
such other date if the exigency of the
circumstances so warrants in SIPC’s
determination, and continue until such
time as SIPC provides otherwise.
(3) Commencing on the first day of the
month following the date on which
SIPC borrows moneys pursuant to
Section 4(f) or Section 4(g) of the Act,
and continuing while any such
borrowing is outstanding and until such
further time as SIPC provides otherwise,
the amount of each member’s
assessment shall be at an assessment
rate of not less than one-half (1⁄2) of one
(1) percent per annum of such member’s
gross revenues from the securities
business.
(b) Payments. Assessments shall be
payable at such times and in such
manner as may be determined by SIPC’s
Vice President—Finance with the
approval of the Chairman.
[(c) Collection of General
Assessments. Each member of the
Corporation who is a member of a selfregulatory organization shall pay
assessments to its collection agent. In
the case of members who are not
members of any self-regulatory
organization, assessments shall be paid
directly to the Corporation.]
[(d)](c) Report by Collection Agents.
Within 45 days after each due date, each
self-regulatory organization that acts
as[which is the] collection agent for
SIPC shall submit a written report to
SIPC [ the Corporation] as to any entity
[for whom it acts as collection agent]
whose filing or assessment payment has
not been received.
[(e)](d) Interest on Assessments. If all
or any part of an assessment payable
under Section 4 of the Act has not been
timely received [by the collection agent
within 15 days after the due date
thereof], the member shall pay, in
addition to the amount of the
assessment, interest at the rate of 20%
per annum on the unpaid portion of the
assessment for each day it has been
overdue. If any broker or dealer has
incorrectly filed a claim for exclusion
from membership in the Corporation,
such broker or dealer shall pay, in
addition to assessments due, interest at
the rate of 20% per annum on the
unpaid assessment for each day it has
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 20 / Thursday, January 30, 2020 / Notices
not been paid since the date on which
it should have been paid.
[(f) Gross Revenues. The term ‘‘gross
revenues from the securities business’’
includes the revenues in the definition
of gross revenues from the securities
business set forth in the applicable
sections of the Act.
(g) Net Operating Revenues. The term
‘‘net operating revenues from the
securities business’’ means gross
revenues from the securities business
less interest and dividend expenses, and
includes those clarifications as are set
forth in the SIPC assessment forms and
instructions.]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Section 2. Overpayments
If the final annual reconciliation filed
by a terminated member reflects an
assessment overpayment carried
forward that exceeds $150.00, SIPC may
refund such excess to the member upon
receipt of the member’s written request
therefor and after [the member’s] SIPC
[collection agent] has confirmed [to
SIPC]that all of the member’s SIPC
assessment form filings and payments
and reports required by SEC Rule 17a–
5 covering periods through the
termination date have been reviewed
and accepted.
Section 3. Interpretation of Terms
(a) For purposes of calculating
assessments [this article]:
[(a)](i) The term ‘‘securities in trading
accounts’’ shall mean securities held for
sale in the ordinary course of business
and not identified as having been held
for investment.
[(b)](ii) The term ‘‘securities in
investment accounts’’ shall mean
securities that are clearly identified as
having been acquired for investment in
accordance with provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code applicable to
dealers in securities.
[(c)](iii) The term ‘‘fees and other
income from such other categories of the
securities business’’ shall mean all
revenue related either directly or
indirectly to the securities business
except revenue included in Section
16(9)(A)–(K) and revenue specifically
excepted in Section 4(c)(3)(C).
(b) For purposes of this Article:
(i) Gross Revenues. The term ‘‘gross
revenues from the securities business’’
includes the revenues in the definition
of gross revenues from the securities
business set forth in the applicable
sections of the Act.
(ii) Net Operating Revenues. The term
‘‘net operating revenues from the
securities business’’ means gross
revenues from the securities business
less interest and dividend expenses, and
includes those clarifications as are set
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:56 Jan 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
forth in the SIPC assessment forms and
instructions.
(iii) SIPC Fund or Fund. The term
‘‘SIPC Fund’’ or ‘‘Fund’’ is as defined in
Section 4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of
confirmed lines of credit.
(iv) SIPC’s unrestricted net assets. The
term ‘‘SIPC’s unrestricted net assets’’
means the lesser of SIPC’s unrestricted
net assets as reflected in SIPC’s most
recent audited Statement of Financial
Position or reasonably expected by SIPC
to be reflected in its next audited
Statement of Financial Position.
5525
All submissions should refer to File
Number SIPC–2019–02, and should be
submitted on orbefore February 20,
2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01610 Filed 1–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
V. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing by
any of the following methods:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number
SIPC–2019–02 on the subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Phlx’s Pricing
Schedule
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments to Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All comments should refer to File
Number SIPC–2019–02. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed bylaw
changes that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed bylaw changes between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Commission. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
PO 00000
Frm 00159
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Release No. 34–88036; File No. SR–Phlx–
2020–02]
January 24, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
14, 2020, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Phlx’s Pricing Schedule. Specifically,
the Exchange proposes to amend
Options 7, Section 4, titled ‘‘Multiply
Listed Options Fees (Includes options
overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and
indexes which are Multiply Listed).’’
The Exchange originally filed the
proposed pricing changes on January 2,
2020 (SR-Phlx-2020–01). On January 14,
2020, the Exchange withdrew that filing
and submitted this filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(f)(2)(i); 17 CFR 200.30–3(f)(3).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5519-5525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01610]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. SIPA-179A; File No. SIPC-2019-02]
Securities Investor Protection Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC Member Assessments; Correction
January 24, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 3(e)(1) of the Securities Investor Protection
Act of 1970 (``SIPA''),\1\ on November 19, 2019 the Securities Investor
Protection Corporation (``SIPC'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') proposed bylaw changes relating to
SIPC member assessments. On December 10, 2019, SIPC consented to a 90-
day extension of time before the proposed bylaw changes would take
effect pursuant to section 3(e)(1) of SIPA.\2\ Pursuant to section
3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA, the Commission finds that these proposed bylaw
changes involve a matter of such significant public interest that
public comment should be obtained.\3\ Therefore, pursuant to section
3(e)(2)(A) of SIPA,\4\ the Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comment from interested persons on the proposed bylaw
changes.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
\2\ Id.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2)(A).
\5\ This notice of SIPC's filing of proposed bylaw changes
relating to SIPC member assessments supersedes the notice originally
published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2020. See
Securities Investor Protection Corporation; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC Member Assessments, Release
No. SIPA-179 (Jan. 16, 2020), 85 FR 3986 (Jan. 23, 2020). The notice
published on January 23, 2020 inadvertently omitted from the ``Text
of the Proposed Bylaw Change'' section deleted text in paragraph (g)
of Section 1 of Article 6 of the SIPC bylaws defining ``net
operating revenues from the securities business.'' This notice
reflects that the definition would remain the same but would move
from paragraph (g) of Section 1 of Article 6 of the SIPC bylaws to
paragraph (b)(ii) of Section 3 of Article 6 of the SIPC bylaws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its filing with the Commission, SIPC included statements
concerning the purpose of and statutory basis for the proposed bylaw
changes as described below, which description has been substantially
prepared by SIPC.
I. SIPC's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, SIPC
Proposed Bylaw Changes Relating to SIPC Member Assessments
Pursuant to Section 3(e)(1) of SIPA, 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1),\6\ SIPC
hereby submits for filing with the Commission proposed amendments to
Article 6 of the SIPC Bylaws (``Bylaws''). Article 6 relates to the
assessments that SIPC imposes upon its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For convenience, references hereinafter to provisions of
SIPA shall be to the United States Code and shall omit ``15 U.S.C.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As revised, Article 6 would maintain assessments at the current
rate of 0.15 percent of a member's net operating revenue from the
securities business until SIPC's unrestricted net assets reach $5
billion.\7\ ``Unrestricted net assets'' are comprised primarily of the
amount in the SIPC Fund at year end, minus the estimated cost to
complete pending liquidation proceedings, as reflected in SIPC's most
recent audited Statement of Financial Position. Once the aforementioned
condition is met, SIPC would commission a study to consider the
adequacy of the SIPC Fund, and would do so every four years thereafter.
The study would analyze a variety of factors, as set forth in the
proposed amended Bylaw. After consideration of the study and the report
thereon, and after consultation with the Commission and self-regulatory
organizations, SIPC could increase or decrease, within certain limits,
the appropriate assessment rate in order to maintain the Fund and
effect SIPA's purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ``Net operating revenues from the securities business'' is
``gross revenues from the securities business less interest and
dividend expenses, and includes those clarifications as are set
forth in the SIPC assessment forms and instructions.'' SIPC Bylaw
Article 6, Section 1(a)(3)(g) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to SIPA Section 78ddd(c)(2), SIPC has consulted with self-
regulatory organizations with respect to the proposed amendments. SIPC
has determined that the changes are necessary and appropriate to
maintain the SIPC Fund.
Background
SIPC is a non-profit member organization created in 1970 under
SIPA, for the protection of customers of member broker-dealers placed
in liquidation under SIPA. With some exceptions set by statute, all
registered securities brokers or dealers are members of SIPC. SIPC
protects the customers of member firms in liquidation under SIPA. Among
other things, SIPC advances funds to satisfy the claims of customers.
Each customer is protected by SIPC up to $500,000 against the loss of
missing cash and/or securities entrusted by the customer to the broker.
The $500,000 includes a limit of up to $250,000 where the allowed claim
is for cash only. The advances by SIPC come from a ``Fund'' that SIPC
administers. The Fund largely is comprised of assessments paid to SIPC
by its members. The Fund also is used to pay the administrative
expenses of a liquidation proceeding where the debtor's general estate
is insufficient, and to finance the day-to-day operations of SIPC.
The Assessment Bylaw
Article 6 of the Bylaws now imposes a yearly assessment rate of
0.15% of net operating revenues from the member's securities business
(``NOR'') where the balance of the SIPC Fund is less than $2.5 billion
and will remain at that amount for six months or more. If the SIPC Fund
has reached $2.5 billion but SIPC's unrestricted net asset amount is
less than $2.5 billion, then the yearly assessment rate is .15% of NOR.
Once the unrestricted net assets total at least $2.5 billion, then the
assessment rate is a minimum assessment of .02% of NOR.
Currently, SIPC's only sources of funding are its Fund and a
possible Government loan. To ensure that SIPC has sufficient
independent resources to carry out its purposes (thus obviating the
need to borrow from the Federal Government), SIPC has determined to
keep the assessment rate at 0.15% of NOR until SIPC's unrestricted net
assets total $5 billion. This will accomplish a few things: (1) Provide
a larger cushion for unknown contingencies; (2) reduce the potential
volatility of member
[[Page 5520]]
assessments during periods of economic downturn or individual member
crisis; and (3) promote sound financial management in light of SIPC's
statutory mission.
Basis and Purpose of Proposed Changes
There is no scientific basis for determining the exact adequacy of
the SIPC Fund. Nevertheless, SIPC's statutory obligation to protect
customers of failed firms, and in certain cases, to pay the costs and
expenses of administration of the liquidation proceeding, impose upon
SIPC a duty to take a responsible approach to calculating both the size
of the SIPC Fund, and the reasonableness of an assessment rate that
maintains and promotes adequate funding.
As SIPC has witnessed over the past decade, risks abound--from a
large firm failure with encumbered assets, to a Ponzi scheme with
significant losses to customers, to risks presented by a cybersecurity
attack or the use of digital assets. Assessing the adequacy of the Fund
is especially challenging because the cost of a liquidation does not
necessarily correlate with any traditional measure of financial
exposure for broker-dealers. Instead, the Fund's adequacy depends
largely on member firms' compliance with customer protection or net
capital rules, the probability of which is challenging to quantify.
SIPC's resources must enhance investor confidence. Given the risks
described above, and remaining vigilant regarding the uncertainties in
an ever-changing marketplace, SIPC believes that in order for its
mission of customer protection to succeed, SIPC must maintain a robust
Fund.
Historical Perspective
The initial SIPC Fund totaled $77.6 million.\8\ In 1992, SIPC's
Board (``the Board'') raised the target balance of the SIPC Fund to $1
billion, and the SIPC Fund reached that amount in 1996. The Board last
sought to augment the size of the Fund in 2009, when, following the
commencement of the liquidation proceedings of Lehman Brothers Inc.
(``LBI''), and Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (``BLMIS''),
the assessment rate was revised to cause the Fund to grow to $2.5
billion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Comprised of member assessments of $9.6 million, the
transfer of $3 million from the American Stock Exchange, Inc. trust
fund, and confirmed lines of credit totaling $65 million.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30JA20.000
As the graph above reveals, before the liquidation of BLMIS in
2008, SIPC's Fund balance had doubled roughly every ten years. In
addition, during those years and until 2010, SIPC had a substantial
confirmed private line of credit.\9\ Due to the high cost and/or
unavailability, SIPC no longer has the private line of credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ SIPC's last credit agreement, a $500 million, 3-yr.
revolving credit facility, expired March 1, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Risk Landscape
The financial crisis of 2008, and the ensuing liquidation
proceedings of LBI and BLMIS, revealed clearly the need for SIPC to
increase the Fund balance. Although the LBI liquidation proceeding
ultimately did not require SIPC to advance funds to satisfy claims, or
pay for expenses of administration, any future failure of a global
enterprise and its broker-dealer affiliate could have a very different
outcome for SIPC. For example, had funds sought by LBI been encumbered
overseas, or had LBI been reducing artificially its segregated customer
reserve requirement through otherwise legal complex transactions, that
may have imposed significant demands on the SIPC Fund.
The liquidation proceeding of BLMIS has required SIPC to make the
largest aggregate advance in its history. In statistical terms, the
amount is more than 100 standard deviations greater than the amounts
advanced by SIPC in all of its previous cases.\10\ Today, an event
statistically comparable to BLMIS would require advances to customers
amounting to between $4 billion and $5 billion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In addition, the amounts advanced by SIPC in the BLMIS
liquidation are more than 107 times greater than the average advance
of the ten next largest SIPC cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIPC faces risks beyond those posed by large Ponzi schemes or a
credit crisis. These additional risks, many of which are hard to
quantify, include, for example, technology-related failures, such as a
cyberattack on a large SIPC member that restricts access by customers
to their assets; or risks stemming from the delay in computing a
broker-dealer's reserve requirement. For example, SEC Rule 15c3-3, 17
CFR 240.15c3-3, which governs the protection of customer assets,
requires a broker-dealer to compute its cash reserve requirement on a
weekly, not daily, basis. Although a number of SIPC members voluntarily
rebalance their cash reserves on a daily basis, a large SIPC member
that does not might not have enough cash in its Rule 15c3-3(e) reserve
account due to an increase in its net cash obligations following its
last required reserve computation.
Another factor underscoring SIPC concerns is the potential risk to
the solvency of the SIPC Fund under the Orderly Liquidation provisions
of the Dodd Frank Act, Title II. Dodd-Frank creates an important role
for SIPC in the event of the failure of a covered, large complex
securities broker-dealer that presents systemic risk. Under Dodd-Frank,
SIPC is designated as trustee for the liquidation of the broker-dealer
under SIPA. 12 U.S.C. 5385(A). As trustee, SIPC must determine and
satisfy claims against the broker-dealer consistent with SIPA. 12
U.S.C. 5385(D). While the FDIC has expressed a preference to use Dodd-
Frank to intervene at the holding company level,\11\ the law
nevertheless remains available to liquidate a systemically important
broker-dealer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Resolution of Systemically Important Financial
Institutions: The Single Point of Entry Strategy, 78 FR 76614 (Dec.
18, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanism for Setting the Assessment Rate
Once the unrestricted net asset amount is $5 billion, SIPC would,
as it
[[Page 5521]]
often has in the past,\12\ commission a study to review the adequacy of
the SIPC Fund. In the ordinary course, SIPC would commission the study
every four years. The study would entail consideration of such factors
as the overall state of the SIPC Fund, current and projected financial
market conditions and trends, historic and perceived risks and threats
to the viability of the SIPC Fund, any undue burden on members, or
members' customers, and other factors deemed appropriate by the SIPC
Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ At various times, the size of SIPC's Fund has been
independently reviewed. See, e.g., GAO Report, The Regulatory
Framework Has Minimized SIPC's Losses, September 1992; Review of
SIPC Risk Profile and Practices, Fitch Risk Management, 2003; Loss
Modeling and Capital Reserve Adequacy Study, Algorithmics Inc.,
2008; Task Force Recommendation Analysis: Methodology and Summary of
Results, Opera Solutions LLC, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon consideration of the results of the study and the report
thereon that would issue, and after consultation with the Commission
and one or more self-regulatory organizations, SIPC would set the
appropriate assessment rate necessary to maintain the Fund and satisfy
SIPA's purposes.
Other provisions of SIPC Bylaw Article 6 are unchanged such as the
rate when the Fund is less than $150 million, or less than $100
million, or the circumstances under which the rate imposed can be more
than \1/2\ of 1% of gross revenues from the securities business but not
more than 1% thereof.\13\ These provisions largely track the
requirements under SIPA Sections 78ddd(c)(3)(B) and 78ddd(d)(1)(A) and
B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ ``Gross revenues from the securities business'' is defined
in SIPA Section 78lll(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given not only the risks described above, but the risk to members
that, by statute, a significant event could cause assessment rates
immediately to jump to at least 0.50% of gross revenues from the
securities business and possibly be as high as 1%, SIPC submits that
growing the Fund at a consistent pace lessens any negative impact on
members, with the attendant benefit of reaching $5 billion sooner.
Barring unforeseen sizeable expenditures, SIPC estimates that at the
current yearly assessment rate of .15% of NOR, SIPC's unrestricted net
assets, as reflected in SIPC's audited Statement of Financial Position,
would be $5 billion by no later than December 31, 2026. If SIPC did
nothing to address the adequacy of the Fund or the assessment rate,
then at a rate of 0.02% per annum, which would be the assessment under
the current version of the Assessment Bylaw, the $5 billion balance
would not be reached until the year 2040.
Impact on Members
Adopting the modifications proposed by SIPC should have a limited
impact on member firms. As the chart below reveals, based on 2018 data,
SIPC staff estimates that two-thirds of the total difference in annual
assessments under the proposed assessment rate structure would be paid
by only 30 members for which the difference in the assessment payment
would amount, on average, only to .091% of their total revenue.
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
[[Page 5522]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30JA20.001
BILLING CODE 8011-01-C
In the above chart, column 1 refers to the difference in amount
that a broker-dealer would pay as a result of being assessed at a rate
of .15% instead of .02%. Column 2 is the number of broker-dealers
impacted at that amount. Column 3 is the percentage that the broker-
dealers at a certain level represent relative to the total number of
broker-dealers. Column 4 is the total additional amount paid by all
broker-dealers at a given level. Column 5 is the percentage that the
payments reflect relative to all payments. Column 6 is the percentage
that the payments represent, on average, relative to the broker-
dealers' revenue.
Thus, an assessment rate of .15%, as opposed to .02%, would cause
the largest 30 SIPC members to pay approximately $172 million more out
of their approximately $213 billion in revenue. This increase amounts
to approximately 8/100 of 1% of such members' revenue, and represents
\2/3\ of the total impact on all members. More than half of SIPC
members would see an increase of less than $2,500 in the amount of
their annual assessment, with more than 20% of members paying a
difference of less than $100. In other words, the impact of modifying
the assessment structure on both the total assessment burden, and the
distribution of the assessment burden, among individual broker-dealers,
would be comparatively limited.
Proposed Technical Changes
Clarification of Role of Collection Agent
In addition to the above, SIPC proposes to amend that portion of
the Assessment Bylaw relating to Collection of General Assessments
(SIPC Bylaw Article 6, Section 1(c)).
Under SIPA Section 78iii(a), each self-regulatory organization
(``SRO'') may act as the collection agent for SIPC to collect
assessments payable by members for which the SRO is the examining
authority. However, SIPA does not mandate that SIPC use a collection
agent to collect assessments, and SIPA does not restrict collection
exclusively to collection agents. See, e.g., SIPA Section 78ddd(c)(1)
(``Each member of SIPC shall pay to SIPC, or the collection agent for
SIPC . . . .[emphasis added]''). Furthermore, under SIPA Section
78ccc(b)(8), since SIPC has the power to ``do any and all other acts
and things as may be necessary or incidental to the conduct of its
business and the exercise of all other rights and powers granted to
SIPC,'' SIPC has the general authority
[[Page 5523]]
directly to collect assessments. Indeed, for more than 20 years--since
the mid-1990s--members have paid assessments directly to SIPC. Where
members have failed to pay their assessments, SIPC has referred the
delinquency to Commission staff and currently brings the matter to the
attention of FINRA for collection.
In keeping with current practice, and in light of technological
developments and capabilities that have continued to improve
considerably, the proposed bylaw removes the provision that requires
members to pay assessments to collection agents. The proposed Bylaw
amendment re-letters the provisions that follow current Bylaw Article
6, Section 1(c). The re-lettered provisions include current Section
1(d) of Bylaw Article 6 (Report by Collection Agents). Section 1(d)
requires the SROs to report in writing to SIPC as to any member from
which the SRO has or has not been successful in collecting payment. In
this manner, SIPC can stay informed as to any member that continues to
be delinquent and refer the member, as needed, to the Commission for
further action under SIPA Section 78jjj(a).
Elimination of Interest Payment Period on Past-Due Payments
Currently, the SIPC Bylaw provides that if a member's assessment
payment has not been received within 15 days of the due date, the
stated interest rate for late payments applies to unpaid amounts. In
January, 2019, SIPC developed an internet payment portal, whereby
members can pay SIPC directly online. SIPC is also presently working on
the development of a portal through which, among other things, members
can file assessment forms. The creation by SIPC of the means by which
members can make immediate payment obviates the need for a grace
period.
Conclusion
Given the many risks that have arisen in the past two decades, and
the potential risks SIPC continues to face, SIPC must be prudent in
determining what constitutes a sufficient level of funding. Indeed,
maintaining the adequacy of the SIPC Fund is in everyone's interest--it
enhances investor protection. While SIPC could raise the assessment on
an ad hoc basis as the situation warrants, it believes that the
approach set forth herein is the better course of action, as it
promotes greater stability and predictability for both investors and
member firms.
II. Need for Public Comment
Section 3(e)(1) of SIPA provides that the SIPC Board must file a
copy of any proposed bylaw change with the Commission, accompanied by a
concise general statement of the basis and purpose of the proposed
bylaw change.\14\ The proposed bylaw change will become effective
thirty days after the date of filing with the Commission or upon such
later date as SIPC may designate or such earlier date as the Commission
may determine unless: (A) The Commission, by notice to SIPC setting
forth the reasons for such action, disapproves the proposed bylaw
change as being contrary to the public interest or contrary to the
purposes of SIPA; or (B) the Commission finds that the proposed bylaw
change involves a matter of such significant public interest that
public comment should be obtained, in which case it may, after
notifying SIPC in writing of such finding, require that the procedures
for SIPC proposed rule changes in section 3(e)(2) of SIPA be followed
with respect to the proposed bylaw change.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SIPC Fund, which is built from assessments on its members and
the interest earned on the Fund, is used for the protection of
customers of members liquidated under SIPA to maintain investor
confidence in the securities markets. In light of this fact and that
the bylaw change provides for a modified calculation of the assessment
rate and a change to collection practices, the Commission finds,
pursuant to section 3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA,\16\ that the proposed bylaw
change involves a matter of such significant public interest that
public comment should be obtained and is requiring that the procedures
applicable to SIPC proposed rule changes in section 3(e)(2) of SIPA
\17\ be followed. As required by section 3(e)(1)(B) of SIPA,\18\ the
Commission has notified SIPC of this finding in writing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Bylaw Changes and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, or within such longer period (A) as the Commission
may designate of not more than ninety days after such date if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so
finding or (B) as to which SIPC consents, the Commission shall: (i) By
order approve such proposed bylaw changes; or (ii) institute
proceedings to determine whether such proposed bylaw changes should be
disapproved.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78ccc(e)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Text of Proposed Bylaw Change
The text of the proposed bylaw changes is provided below. Proposed
new language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.
Article 6
Assessments
Section 1. General
(a) Amount of Assessment
(1) The amount of each member's assessment for the member's fiscal
year shall be the product of the assessment rate established by SIPC
for that fiscal year and either the member's gross [or net ]revenues or
net operating revenues from the securities business, as follows:
(A) [The assessment rate shall be one-fourth (\1/4\) of one (1)
percent per annum of net operating revenues from the member's
securities business for each calendar year or part thereof unless SIPC
determines that the balance of the SIPC Fund, as defined in Section
4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of credit,] If at any
time SIPC determines that SIPC's unrestricted net assets are:
(i) Less than $5.0 billion but not less than $2.5 billion, and are
reasonably likely to remain less than $5.0 billion but not less than
$2.5 billion, the amount of each member's assessment shall be 0.15
percent per annum of net operating revenues from the member's
securities business for each calendar year or part thereof. [has
aggregated a balance of $2.5 billion, and]
(ii) less than $2.5 billon, the amount of each member's assessment
shall be one-fourth (\1/4\) of one (1) percent per annum of net
operating revenues from the member's securities business for each
calendar year or part thereof. [will remain at or above $2.5 billion
for six months or more.]
(B) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if at any time
SIPC determines that the balance of the SIPC Fund aggregates or is
reasonably likely to aggregate:
(i) Less than $150,000,000--the amount of each member's assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined by SIPC, but in no case shall
the amount of each member's assessment be less than an assessment rate
of one-fourth (\1/4\) of one (1) percent per annum of such member's
gross revenues from the securities business.
(ii) less than $100,000,000--the amount of each member's assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined by SIPC, but in no case shall
the amount of each member's assessment be less than an assessment rate
of one-half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent per annum of such
[[Page 5524]]
member's gross revenues from the securities business.
(iii) The amount of each member's assessment shall not exceed one-
half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent per annum of such member's gross
revenues from the securities business, unless SIPC determines that a
rate in excess of one-half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent during any twelve
(12) month period will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of its members or their customers. No assessment
made pursuant to this section 1(a)(1) shall require payments during any
such period that exceed in the aggregate one (1) percent of any
member's gross revenues from the securities business for such period.
[Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1(a)(1)(A) herein, if
SIPC determines that the balance of the SIPC Fund, as defined in
Section 4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of credit, (i)
has aggregated $2.5 billion, and (ii) will remain at or above $2.5
billion for six months or more, but SIPC's unrestricted net assets, as
reflected in SIPC's most recent audited Statement of Financial
Position, are less than $2.5 billion, the assessment rate shall be 0.15
percent per annum of net operating revenues from the member's
securities business for each calendar year or part thereof.]
(C) SIPC shall commission a study (``Study'') every four years to
examine the adequacy of the balance of SIPC's unrestricted net assets
and the SIPC Fund and the appropriate assessment rate that is necessary
to fulfill the purposes of the Act. The Study will examine the overall
state of SIPC's unrestricted net assets and Fund balances, current and
projected financial market conditions and trends, historic and
perceived risks and threats to the viability of SIPC's unrestricted net
assets and Fund, any undue burden on members or members' customers, and
such other factors as the Board determines. The Study shall result in a
report (``Report'') to be furnished to SIPC. The first Study shall be
commissioned when SIPC reasonably anticipates that SIPC's unrestricted
net assets have reached a total of $5.0 billion. [If SIPC determines
that the balance of the SIPC Fund, as defined in Section 4(a)(2) of the
Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of credit, has aggregated $2.5
billion or more, and will remain at or above $2.5 billion for six
months or more, and SIPC's unrestricted net assets, as reflected in
SIPC's most recent audited Statement of Financial Position, are at or
above $2.5 billion, members shall pay a minimum assessment, which shall
be 0.02 percent of the net operating revenues from the securities
business for each calendar year or part thereof.]
(D) Without limitation of SIPC's authority under 15 U.S.C. 78ccc
and 78ddd to set assessments, if SIPC determines that SIPC's
unrestricted net assets are $5.0 billion or more and are reasonably
likely to remain above $5.0 billion, and after review of the
information contained in the last Report at such time, and after
consultation with the Securities and Exchange Commission and self-
regulatory organizations, SIPC may not more than once in any four-year
period, increase or decrease the assessment rate by up to, but not more
than, twenty-five percent (25%) of the rate in effect at that time.
[Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, if at any time SIPC
determines that the balance of the SIPC Fund, as defined in Section
4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of credit, aggregates
or is reasonably likely to aggregate:
(i) Less than $2.5 billion and will likely remain less than $2.5
billion for a period of six (6) months or more--the amount of each
member's assessment shall be at an assessment rate of one-fourth (\1/
4\) of one (1) percent per annum of net operating revenue.
(ii) less than $150,000,000--the amount of each member's assessment
shall be at an amount to be determined by SIPC, but in no case shall
the amount of each member's assessment be less than an assessment rate
of one-fourth (\1/4\) of one (1) percent per annum of such member's
gross revenues from the securities business.
(iii) less than $100,000,000--the amount of each member's
assessment shall be at an amount to be determined by SIPC, but in no
case shall the amount of each member's assessment be less than an
assessment rate of one-half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent per annum of
such member's gross revenues from the securities business.
(iv) The amount of each member's assessment shall not exceed one-
half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent per annum of such member's gross
revenues from the securities business, unless SIPC determines that a
rate in excess of one-half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent during any twelve
(12) month period will not have a material adverse effect on the
financial condition of its members or their customers. No assessment
made pursuant to this section 1(a)(1) shall require payments during any
such period that exceed in the aggregate one (1) percent of any
member's gross revenues from the securities business for such period.]
(E) Any minimum assessment imposed upon each member of SIPC shall
be 0.02 percent of the net operating revenues from the securities
business of such member for each calendar year or part thereof.
(2) Any change in assessments made in accordance with Section
1(a)(1) herein shall commence on the first day of the year following
the date on which SIPC announces its determination, or on such other
date if the exigency of the circumstances so warrants in SIPC's
determination, and continue until such time as SIPC provides otherwise.
(3) Commencing on the first day of the month following the date on
which SIPC borrows moneys pursuant to Section 4(f) or Section 4(g) of
the Act, and continuing while any such borrowing is outstanding and
until such further time as SIPC provides otherwise, the amount of each
member's assessment shall be at an assessment rate of not less than
one-half (\1/2\) of one (1) percent per annum of such member's gross
revenues from the securities business.
(b) Payments. Assessments shall be payable at such times and in
such manner as may be determined by SIPC's Vice President--Finance with
the approval of the Chairman.
[(c) Collection of General Assessments. Each member of the
Corporation who is a member of a self-regulatory organization shall pay
assessments to its collection agent. In the case of members who are not
members of any self-regulatory organization, assessments shall be paid
directly to the Corporation.]
[(d)](c) Report by Collection Agents. Within 45 days after each due
date, each self-regulatory organization that acts as[which is the]
collection agent for SIPC shall submit a written report to SIPC [ the
Corporation] as to any entity [for whom it acts as collection agent]
whose filing or assessment payment has not been received.
[(e)](d) Interest on Assessments. If all or any part of an
assessment payable under Section 4 of the Act has not been timely
received [by the collection agent within 15 days after the due date
thereof], the member shall pay, in addition to the amount of the
assessment, interest at the rate of 20% per annum on the unpaid portion
of the assessment for each day it has been overdue. If any broker or
dealer has incorrectly filed a claim for exclusion from membership in
the Corporation, such broker or dealer shall pay, in addition to
assessments due, interest at the rate of 20% per annum on the unpaid
assessment for each day it has
[[Page 5525]]
not been paid since the date on which it should have been paid.
[(f) Gross Revenues. The term ``gross revenues from the securities
business'' includes the revenues in the definition of gross revenues
from the securities business set forth in the applicable sections of
the Act.
(g) Net Operating Revenues. The term ``net operating revenues from
the securities business'' means gross revenues from the securities
business less interest and dividend expenses, and includes those
clarifications as are set forth in the SIPC assessment forms and
instructions.]
Section 2. Overpayments
If the final annual reconciliation filed by a terminated member
reflects an assessment overpayment carried forward that exceeds
$150.00, SIPC may refund such excess to the member upon receipt of the
member's written request therefor and after [the member's] SIPC
[collection agent] has confirmed [to SIPC]that all of the member's SIPC
assessment form filings and payments and reports required by SEC Rule
17a-5 covering periods through the termination date have been reviewed
and accepted.
Section 3. Interpretation of Terms
(a) For purposes of calculating assessments [this article]:
[(a)](i) The term ``securities in trading accounts'' shall mean
securities held for sale in the ordinary course of business and not
identified as having been held for investment.
[(b)](ii) The term ``securities in investment accounts'' shall mean
securities that are clearly identified as having been acquired for
investment in accordance with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
applicable to dealers in securities.
[(c)](iii) The term ``fees and other income from such other
categories of the securities business'' shall mean all revenue related
either directly or indirectly to the securities business except revenue
included in Section 16(9)(A)-(K) and revenue specifically excepted in
Section 4(c)(3)(C).
(b) For purposes of this Article:
(i) Gross Revenues. The term ``gross revenues from the securities
business'' includes the revenues in the definition of gross revenues
from the securities business set forth in the applicable sections of
the Act.
(ii) Net Operating Revenues. The term ``net operating revenues from
the securities business'' means gross revenues from the securities
business less interest and dividend expenses, and includes those
clarifications as are set forth in the SIPC assessment forms and
instructions.
(iii) SIPC Fund or Fund. The term ``SIPC Fund'' or ``Fund'' is as
defined in Section 4(a)(2) of the Act, exclusive of confirmed lines of
credit.
(iv) SIPC's unrestricted net assets. The term ``SIPC's unrestricted
net assets'' means the lesser of SIPC's unrestricted net assets as
reflected in SIPC's most recent audited Statement of Financial Position
or reasonably expected by SIPC to be reflected in its next audited
Statement of Financial Position.
V. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SIPC-2019-02 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All comments should refer to File Number SIPC-2019-02. To help the
Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/other.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed bylaw changes that are filed
with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
proposed bylaw changes between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Commission.
All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SIPC-2019-02, and
should be submitted on or before February 20, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(f)(2)(i); 17 CFR 200.30-3(f)(3).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-01610 Filed 1-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P