Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend Rule 6.31 in Connection with the Exchange's Clearing Editor, 5267-5269 [2020-01518]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MRX–2020–02 and should
be submitted on or before February 19,
2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01520 Filed 1–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–88019; File No. SR–C2–
2020–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating To Amend Rule
6.31 in Connection with the
Exchange’s Clearing Editor
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
January 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
16, 2020, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) proposes to amend
Rule 6.31 in connection with the
Exchange’s Clearing Editor. The text of
the proposed rule change is provided
below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are
[bracketed])
*
*
*
*
*
Rules of Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 6.31. Clearing Editor
(a) No change.
(b) Trading Permit Holders may
change the following fields through the
Clearing Editor: (1) Executing Firm and
Contra Firm; (2) Executing Broker and
Contra Broker; (3) CMTA; (4) Account
and Sub Account; (5) [Customer]Client
Order ID; (6) Position Effect (open/
close); or (7) Capacity (if the change is
from a customer Capacity code of (C) to
any other Capacity code, it must be
accompanied by a Reason Code, and
notice of such change will automatically
be sent to the Exchange with the
submission of the change through the
Clearing Editor).
*
*
*
*
*
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/ctwo/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.31 in connection with its
Clearing Editor. The Clearing Editor
currently allows Trading Permit Holders
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5267
(‘‘TPHs’’) to update executed trades on
their trading dates and revise them for
clearing. Specifically, the Clearing
Editor allows TPHs to correct certain
bonafide errors by changing certain
fields, pursuant to Rule 6.31(b),
including: (1) Executing Firm and
Contra Firm; (2) Executing Broker and
Contra Broker; (3) CMTA; (4) Account
and Sub Account; (5) Customer ID; (6)
Position Effect (open/close); or (7)
Capacity. The Exchange proposes to
amend the rule to provide additional
specificity regarding a Capacity code
change. The proposed rule provides that
that if the change is from a customer
Capacity code of (C) to any other
Capacity code, it must be accompanied
by a Reason Code and notice of such
change will automatically be sent to the
Exchange with the submission of the
change through the Clearing Editor. As
proposed, Rule 6.31(b) would continue
to allow a TPH to change any Capacity
code to another, however, would just
require a TPH to provide automatic
notification and explanation to the
Exchange via a prompted Reason Code
of a Capacity code change from a
customer Capacity code to another
Capacity code.3 The Exchange notes that
while a change from customer Capacity
code does not affect the Consolidated
Tape or terms of a contract, such
changes may affect other substantive
aspects of how a trade was processed,
including whether or not a trade should
have been given certain preferable
customer treatment (e.g. customer
complex orders are not subject to certain
Complex Order Auction (‘‘COA’’)
restrictions and customer orders may
receive specific rebates or are assessed
reduced fees).4 Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that TPHs making
changes to this field should be required
to provide to the Exchange notice and
explanation relating to the change. As a
result, the proposed Reason Code for
customer Capacity code changes would
better enable the Exchange to surveil for
and enforce against potential issues or
abusive behavior via the Clearing Editor
by allowing the Exchange to understand
the rationale behind all such changes.
The proposed rule change also
updates the term Customer ID in Rule
6.31(b) to Client Order ID, as this term
more accurately reflect the name of the
3 Example Reason Codes include: Input Error;
Unmatched Trade; Unknown; Manual Add; Other
Text Required; Trade Nullification; Trade
Adjustment; Error Account; and System Issue.
4 See C2 Options Exchange Fees Schedule. The
Exchange notes that preferential pricing to
Customers is a long-standing options industry
practice.
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
5268
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
field displayed on an order 5 and in the
Clearing Editor. This proposed rule
change is identical to the manner in
which a Capacity code may be changed
via the Clearing Editor, and the term
Client Order ID is used, on the
Exchange’s affiliated exchange, Cboe
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’).6
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.7 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 8 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 9 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, by requiring a TPH to
submit a Reason Code via the Clearing
Editor in conjunction with a change
made from a customer Capacity code,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change may prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and otherwise
promote just and equitable principles of
trade because it would allow the
Exchange to automatically be notified of
such a change and the rationale behind
the change. This, in turn, would allow
the Exchange to better surveil for and
enforce against potential issues or
abusive behavior via the Clearing Editor.
As such, the proposed rule change is
specifically designed to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange further notes that, for the
same reasons enumerated above, the
proposed rule change is also consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,10 which
5 See Cboe Options FIX Specifications, available
at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/
US_Options_FIX_Specification.pdf.
6 See Cboe Options Rule 6.1.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 Id.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
provides that the Exchange be organized
and have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Act and to
enforce compliance by the Exchange’s
Trading Permit Holders and persons
associated with its Trading Permit
Holders with the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of
the Exchange.
Additionally, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change to update
the term Customer ID to Client Order ID,
a term that more accurately reflects the
field name that is displayed on an order
and in the Clearing Editor, would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and
protect investors by mitigating any
potential confusion surrounding the use
of this field. Finally, the Exchange notes
that the proposed rule change is
identical to the manner in which a
Capacity code change from a customer
Capacity code must be made and the
term Client Order ID is used in Cboe
Options Rule 6.6, previously filed with
the Commission.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe the proposed
rule change would impose any burden
on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the Act, because it would require all
TPHs to input a Reason Code via the
Clearing Editor when changing from a
customer Capacity code. The Exchange
notes that the proposed rule change
does not alter or restrict any the fields
that a TPH may currently change via the
Clearing Editor. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change
would impose any burden on
intermarket competition, because it is
substantially the same as the Clearing
Editor rule on Cboe Options, previously
filed with the Commission. In addition
to this, the Exchange notes that the
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues, but rather, is
concerned with the correction of posttrade information for purposes of
enhancing surveillance and enforcement
for potential issues or abuses of the
Clearing Editor.
PO 00000
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not:
A. significantly affect the protection
of investors or the public interest;
B. impose any significant burden on
competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from
the date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 12
thereunder. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
C2–2020–002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2020–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
11 15
12 17
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
29JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–C2–2020–002, and should
be submitted on or before February 19,
2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01518 Filed 1–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–88020; File No. SR–
PEARL–2020–02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations: MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
PEARL Fee Schedule
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
January 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
15, 2020, MIAX PEARL, LLC (‘‘MIAX
PEARL’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX PEARL Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to make minor, nonsubstantive corrective edits and
clarifying changes.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/pearl at MIAX PEARL’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
VerDate Sep<11>2014
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
Jkt 250001
The Exchange proposes to amend
several sections of the Fee Schedule to
make minor, non-substantive edits to
harmonize terms in the Fee Schedule
with that of the Exchange’s rulebook
and the rulebooks of the Exchange’s
affiliates, Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’) and MIAX
Emerald, LLC (‘‘MIAX Emerald’’).
Currently, throughout the Fee Schedule,
the Exchange’s affiliate, MIAX, is
referred to as ‘‘MIAX Options’’ or
‘‘MIAX Options Exchange.’’ The
Exchange now proposes that all
references throughout the Fee Schedule
that are to ‘‘MIAX Options’’ or ‘‘MIAX
Options Exchange’’ will be amended to
delete the words ‘‘Options’’ or ‘‘Options
Exchange’’ (where applicable), such that
all references will be to the singular
word ‘‘MIAX.’’ The proposed
amendments would be to references to
‘‘MIAX Options’’ or ‘‘MIAX Options
Exchange’’ in the following sections of
the Fee Schedule: (i) the text for the
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5269
definitions of MENI and MIAX in the
Definitions section and the text in the
last paragraph of the Definitions
section 3; (ii) the Routing Fee table in
Section (1)(b); (iii) the text underneath
the Member Network Connectivity
Testing and Certification Fee table in
Section (4)(c); (iv) the text underneath
the Non-Member Network Connectivity
Testing and Certification Fee table in
Section (4)(d); (v) the text underneath
the Monthly Member Network
Connectivity Fee table in Section (5)(a);
and (vi) the text underneath the
Monthly Non-Member Network
Connectivity Fee table in Section (5)(b).
The purpose of these changes is to
harmonize the term ‘‘MIAX’’ in the
Exchange’s Fee Schedule with the
MIAX PEARL rulebook,4 and to provide
consistency for the term ‘‘MIAX’’ across
the Fee Schedules and rulebooks of the
Exchange’s affiliates, MIAX and MIAX
Emerald.5
Next, the Exchange proposes to
amend the Definitions section of the Fee
Schedule to amend a cross-reference in
one of the defined terms. Currently, the
term ‘‘ABBO’’ contains a cross-reference
to Exchange Rule 1400(f), which is
meant to be a cross-reference to the
definition for an ‘‘Eligible Exchange.’’
The correct citation to the definition for
‘‘Eligible Exchange’’ is Exchange Rule
1400(g).6 Accordingly, the Exchange
proposes to amend the cross-reference
in the definition for ‘‘ABBO’’ in the
Definitions section of the Fee Schedule
to be to Exchange Rule 1400(g).
Next, the Exchange proposes to
amend Section (2)(c) of the Fee
Schedule, Web CRD Fees, to make nonsubstantives edits to the sentence in
parentheses following the FINRA
Disclosure Processing Fee under the
section titled ‘‘GENERAL
REGISTRATION FEES.’’ Currently, the
FINRA Disclosure Processing Fee
includes the following in parentheses
‘‘(Form U4, Form U5, Form BD &
amendments)’’. The Exchange now
proposes to delete the ampersand in that
sentence and replace it with the word
3 In connection with this change, the Exchange
also proposes to delete the word ‘‘the’’ before
‘‘MIAX Options’’ in the last paragraph of the
Definitions section as a grammatical correction.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85771
(May 3, 2019), 84 FR 20445 (May 9, 2019) (SR–
PEARL–2019–16).
5 See MIAX and MIAX Emerald Fee Schedules,
Definitions section. See also MIAX Rule 100 and
MIAX Emerald Rule 100.
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87693
(December 9, 2019), 84 FR 68264 (December 13,
2019) (SR–MIAX–2019–48) (which amended,
among other rules, MIAX Rule 1400 citations). The
Exchange notes that the rules contained in MIAX
Chapter XIV are incorporated by reference into
MIAX PEARL Chapter XIV. See MIAX PEARL
Rulebook, Chapter XIV.
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5267-5269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01518]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-88019; File No. SR-C2-2020-002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Amend Rule 6.31 in Connection with the Exchange's Clearing Editor
January 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 16, 2020, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'') proposes to
amend Rule 6.31 in connection with the Exchange's Clearing Editor. The
text of the proposed rule change is provided below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed])
* * * * *
Rules of Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.
* * * * *
Rule 6.31. Clearing Editor
(a) No change.
(b) Trading Permit Holders may change the following fields through
the Clearing Editor: (1) Executing Firm and Contra Firm; (2) Executing
Broker and Contra Broker; (3) CMTA; (4) Account and Sub Account; (5)
[Customer]Client Order ID; (6) Position Effect (open/close); or (7)
Capacity (if the change is from a customer Capacity code of (C) to any
other Capacity code, it must be accompanied by a Reason Code, and
notice of such change will automatically be sent to the Exchange with
the submission of the change through the Clearing Editor).
* * * * *
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/ctwo/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.31 in connection with its
Clearing Editor. The Clearing Editor currently allows Trading Permit
Holders (``TPHs'') to update executed trades on their trading dates and
revise them for clearing. Specifically, the Clearing Editor allows TPHs
to correct certain bonafide errors by changing certain fields, pursuant
to Rule 6.31(b), including: (1) Executing Firm and Contra Firm; (2)
Executing Broker and Contra Broker; (3) CMTA; (4) Account and Sub
Account; (5) Customer ID; (6) Position Effect (open/close); or (7)
Capacity. The Exchange proposes to amend the rule to provide additional
specificity regarding a Capacity code change. The proposed rule
provides that that if the change is from a customer Capacity code of
(C) to any other Capacity code, it must be accompanied by a Reason Code
and notice of such change will automatically be sent to the Exchange
with the submission of the change through the Clearing Editor. As
proposed, Rule 6.31(b) would continue to allow a TPH to change any
Capacity code to another, however, would just require a TPH to provide
automatic notification and explanation to the Exchange via a prompted
Reason Code of a Capacity code change from a customer Capacity code to
another Capacity code.\3\ The Exchange notes that while a change from
customer Capacity code does not affect the Consolidated Tape or terms
of a contract, such changes may affect other substantive aspects of how
a trade was processed, including whether or not a trade should have
been given certain preferable customer treatment (e.g. customer complex
orders are not subject to certain Complex Order Auction (``COA'')
restrictions and customer orders may receive specific rebates or are
assessed reduced fees).\4\ Accordingly, the Exchange believes that TPHs
making changes to this field should be required to provide to the
Exchange notice and explanation relating to the change. As a result,
the proposed Reason Code for customer Capacity code changes would
better enable the Exchange to surveil for and enforce against potential
issues or abusive behavior via the Clearing Editor by allowing the
Exchange to understand the rationale behind all such changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Example Reason Codes include: Input Error; Unmatched Trade;
Unknown; Manual Add; Other Text Required; Trade Nullification; Trade
Adjustment; Error Account; and System Issue.
\4\ See C2 Options Exchange Fees Schedule. The Exchange notes
that preferential pricing to Customers is a long-standing options
industry practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also updates the term Customer ID in Rule
6.31(b) to Client Order ID, as this term more accurately reflect the
name of the
[[Page 5268]]
field displayed on an order \5\ and in the Clearing Editor. This
proposed rule change is identical to the manner in which a Capacity
code may be changed via the Clearing Editor, and the term Client Order
ID is used, on the Exchange's affiliated exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc.
(``Cboe Options'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Cboe Options FIX Specifications, available at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/US_Options_FIX_Specification.pdf.
\6\ See Cboe Options Rule 6.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, by requiring a TPH to submit a Reason Code via the
Clearing Editor in conjunction with a change made from a customer
Capacity code, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change may
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and otherwise promote just and
equitable principles of trade because it would allow the Exchange to
automatically be notified of such a change and the rationale behind the
change. This, in turn, would allow the Exchange to better surveil for
and enforce against potential issues or abusive behavior via the
Clearing Editor. As such, the proposed rule change is specifically
designed to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
further notes that, for the same reasons enumerated above, the proposed
rule change is also consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\10\
which provides that the Exchange be organized and have the capacity to
be able to carry out the purposes of the Act and to enforce compliance
by the Exchange's Trading Permit Holders and persons associated with
its Trading Permit Holders with the Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
to update the term Customer ID to Client Order ID, a term that more
accurately reflects the field name that is displayed on an order and in
the Clearing Editor, would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and
protect investors by mitigating any potential confusion surrounding the
use of this field. Finally, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule
change is identical to the manner in which a Capacity code change from
a customer Capacity code must be made and the term Client Order ID is
used in Cboe Options Rule 6.6, previously filed with the Commission.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change would impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
Act, because it would require all TPHs to input a Reason Code via the
Clearing Editor when changing from a customer Capacity code. The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule change does not alter or restrict
any the fields that a TPH may currently change via the Clearing Editor.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on intermarket competition, because it is
substantially the same as the Clearing Editor rule on Cboe Options,
previously filed with the Commission. In addition to this, the Exchange
notes that the proposed rule change is not intended to address
competitive issues, but rather, is concerned with the correction of
post-trade information for purposes of enhancing surveillance and
enforcement for potential issues or abuses of the Clearing Editor.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
A. significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-C2-2020-002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2020-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use
[[Page 5269]]
only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-C2-2020-002, and should be submitted on
or before February 19, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-01518 Filed 1-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P