Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2017-2018, 3618-3620 [2020-00951]

Download as PDF 3618 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices entries covered by this review where an importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For Toscelik, we will instruct CBP to liquidate its entries during the POR imported by the importers identified in its questionnaire responses without regard to antidumping duties, because its weighted-average dumping margin in these final results is zero.13 For the three companies that had shipments during the POR and that were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries and assess antidumping duties at an ad valorem rate equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin specified in the ‘‘Final Rates of the Administrative Review’’ section, above. Consistent with Commerce’s assessment practice, for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by any company upon which we initiated an administrative review and for which we have found that that company had ‘‘no shipments’’ during the POR, or for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.14 We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each of the companies listed in the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review’’ section above will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 13 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012). 14 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 companies not included in the final results of this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a previous review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 14.74 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.15 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 15 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: January 14, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues General Issues Comment 1: Allegation of a Particular Market Situation (PMS) in Turkey Comment 2: Adjusting for PMS Based on Proposed Regression Analysis Borusan-Specific Issues Comment 3: Whether Section 232 Duties Should be Deducted from U.S. Price Comment 4: Borusan Constructed Export Price (CEP) Sales Comment 5: Whether Borusan Reported Theoretical Weight Correctly Comment 6: Whether Borusan’s Overrun Sales are Outside the Ordinary Course of Trade Comment 7: Reallocation of Material Costs Comment 8: Adjustment for Hot-rolled Coil (HRC) Cost to Account for the Effects of a PMS Toscelik-Specific Issues Comment 9: Application of the PMS Adjustment to Toscelik’s Costs VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–00964 Filed 1–21–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–008] Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang), a producer/ exporter of merchandise subject to this administrative review, made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018. The final weighted-average dumping margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section entitled, ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Applicable January 22, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hannah Falvey or Nicolas Mayora, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4889 or (202) 482–3053, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On July 18, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the administrative review of certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. A summary of events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Results can be found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The products are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description of the scope of order remains dispositive. For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.3 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. 1 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 2018, 84 FR 34337 (July 18, 2019) (Preliminary Results). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for Final Results of the 2017–2018 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 3 For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined that Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. (Sheng Yu), Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. (Tension Steel), Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing), and Pat & Jeff Enterprise Co., Ltd. (P&J) had no shipments during the POR.4 Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no comments from interested parties regarding this decision. As a result, and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we continue to find that Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, and P&J made no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce’s practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, and P&J but exported by other parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.5 Final Results of the Review We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for Shin Yang and the 15 companies not selected for individual review, for the period May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018: Producer/exporter Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd ............ Chung Hung Steel Corp ............. Far East Machinery Co., Ltd ...... Far East Machinery Group ......... Fine Blanking & Tool Co., Ltd .... Hou Lih Co., Ltd ......................... Kao Hsing Chang Iron & Steel Corp ........................................ Lang Hwang Corp ...................... Locksure Inc ............................... New Chance Products Co., Ltd .. Pin Tai Metal Inc ........................ Shang Jouch Industrial Co., Ltd Shuan Hwa Industrial Co., Ltd ... Titan Fastech Ltd ........................ Yeong Shien Industrial Co., Ltd Dumping margin (percent) 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 2.73 4 See Preliminary Results, 84 FR at 34338, and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 2–3. 5 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Producer/exporter 3619 Dumping margin (percent) Yousing Precision Industry Co., Ltd ........................................... 2.73 Assessment Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). For Shin Yang, because its weightedaverage dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment rates. We calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total sales quantity associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review where an importerspecific assessment rate is not zero or de minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis. For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we will assign an assessment rate equal to Shin Yang’s dumping margin identified above.6 The final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.7 As noted in the ‘‘Final Determination of No Shipments’’ section, above, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, or P&J, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if applicable, or at the all-others rate. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 6 The Act does not specify how to calculate a dumping margin for a respondent that is not selected for individual review in an administrative review. Therefore, we look to section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which explains how to calculate the ‘‘all others’’ rate in an investigation, for guidance. Consistent with how we would calculate the ‘‘all others’’ rate in an investigation, we are basing the dumping margin for non-selected companies on the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for the selected respondent, Shin Yang. 7 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1 3620 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be equal to the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review, including the companies Commerce has determined had no shipments in these final results, but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment in which the company was reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the allothers rate established in the LTFV investigation.8 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment 8 See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: January 14, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–00951 Filed 1–21–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–845] Sugar From Mexico: Amendment to the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Applicable January 15, 2020. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) and a representative of the signatory sugar producers/exporters accounting for substantially all imports of sugar from Mexico have signed an amendment to the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico (AD Agreement). The amendment to the AD Agreement modifies the definitions for sugar from Mexico, revises the reference prices for the applicable sugar from Mexico, and provides for enhanced monitoring and enforcement mechanisms. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally C. Gannon or David Cordell at (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–0408, respectively; Bilateral Agreements Unit, Office of Policy, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 17, 2014, Commerce initiated an antidumping duty investigation under section 732 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), to determine whether imports of sugar from Mexico are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 fair value (LTFV).1 On October 24, 2014, Commerce preliminarily determined that sugar from Mexico is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at LTFV, as provided in section 733 of the Act, and postponed the final determination in this investigation until no later than 135 days after the date of publication of the preliminary determination in the Federal Register.2 Commerce and a representative of the signatory producers/exporters accounting for substantially all imports of sugar from Mexico signed the AD Agreement on December 19, 2014.3 On January 8, 2015, Imperial Sugar Company (Imperial) and AmCane Sugar LLC (AmCane) each notified Commerce that they had petitioned the International Trade Commission (ITC) to conduct a review of the AD Agreement under section 734(h) of the Act, to determine whether the injurious effects of the imports of the subject merchandise are eliminated completely by the AD Agreement. On March 24, 2015, in a unanimous vote, the ITC found that the AD Agreement eliminated completely the injurious effects of imports of sugar from Mexico.4 As a result of the ITC’s determination, the AD Agreement remained in effect, and on March 27, 2015, Commerce, in accordance with section 734(h)(3) of the Act, instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the suspension of liquidation of all entries of sugar from Mexico and refund all cash deposits. Notwithstanding issuance of the AD Agreement, pursuant to requests by domestic interested parties, Commerce continued its investigation and made an affirmative final determination of sales at LTFV.5 In its Final Determination, Commerce calculated weighted-average dumping margins of 40.48 percent for Fondo de Empresas Expropiadas del Sector Azucarero (FEESA), 42.14 percent for Ingenio Tala S.A. de C.V. and certain affiliated sugar mills of Grupo Azucarero Mexico S.A. de C.V. (collectively, the GAM Group), and 1 See Sugar from Mexico: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 22795 (April 24, 2014). 2 See Sugar from Mexico: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 79 FR 65189 (November 3, 2014). 3 See Sugar From Mexico: Suspension of Antidumping Investigation, 79 FR 78039 (December 29, 2014) (AD Agreement). 4 See Sugar from Mexico; Determinations, 80 FR 16426 (March 27, 2015). 5 See Sugar From Mexico: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 80 FR 25278 (May 4, 2015); Sugar From Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 80 FR 57341 (September 23, 2015) (Final Determination). E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3618-3620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-008]


Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Shin 
Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang), a producer/exporter of merchandise 
subject to this administrative review, made sales of subject 
merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review (POR) 
May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018. The final weighted-average dumping 
margins for the reviewed firms are listed below in the section 
entitled, ``Final Results of the Review.''

DATES: Applicable January 22, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hannah Falvey or Nicolas Mayora, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of

[[Page 3619]]

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 
(202) 482-4889 or (202) 482-3053, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On July 18, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 
administrative review of certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and 
tubes from Taiwan.\1\ We invited interested parties to comment on the 
Preliminary Results. A summary of events that occurred since Commerce 
published the Preliminary Results can be found in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\2\ Commerce conducted this administrative review 
in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended 
(the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 
from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2017-2018, 84 FR 34337 (July 18, 2019) (Preliminary 
Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for Final 
Results of the 2017-2018 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 
from Taiwan,'' dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this 
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded 
carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The products are currently 
classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings: 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 
7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written product description of 
the scope of order remains dispositive. For a full description of the 
scope, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ For a full description of the scope, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as an 
Appendix. The Issues and Decision memorandum is a public document and 
is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and 
in the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined that 
Sheng Yu Steel Co., Ltd. (Sheng Yu), Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. 
(Tension Steel), Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing), and Pat 
& Jeff Enterprise Co., Ltd. (P&J) had no shipments during the POR.\4\ 
Following publication of the Preliminary Results, we received no 
comments from interested parties regarding this decision. As a result, 
and because the record contains no evidence to the contrary, we 
continue to find that Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, and P&J made 
no shipments during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with Commerce's 
practice, we intend to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by 
Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, and P&J but exported by other 
parties without their own rate, at the all-others rate.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results, 84 FR at 34338, and accompanying 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 2-3.
    \5\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal from the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for Shin Yang and the 15 companies not selected for individual 
review, for the period May 1, 2017 through April 30, 2018:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Dumping
                      Producer/exporter                         margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd....................................        2.73
Chung Hung Steel Corp.......................................        2.73
Far East Machinery Co., Ltd.................................        2.73
Far East Machinery Group....................................        2.73
Fine Blanking & Tool Co., Ltd...............................        2.73
Hou Lih Co., Ltd............................................        2.73
Kao Hsing Chang Iron & Steel Corp...........................        2.73
Lang Hwang Corp.............................................        2.73
Locksure Inc................................................        2.73
New Chance Products Co., Ltd................................        2.73
Pin Tai Metal Inc...........................................        2.73
Shang Jouch Industrial Co., Ltd.............................        2.73
Shuan Hwa Industrial Co., Ltd...............................        2.73
Titan Fastech Ltd...........................................        2.73
Yeong Shien Industrial Co., Ltd.............................        2.73
Yousing Precision Industry Co., Ltd.........................        2.73
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).
    For Shin Yang, because its weighted-average dumping margin is not 
zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has 
calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates. We 
calculated importer-specific antidumping duty assessment rates by 
aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined 
sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total 
sales quantity associated with those sales. We will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this 
review where an importer-specific assessment rate is not zero or de 
minimis. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to 
liquidate without regard to antidumping duties any entries for which 
the importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis.
    For the companies which were not selected for individual review, we 
will assign an assessment rate equal to Shin Yang's dumping margin 
identified above.\6\ The final results of this review shall be the 
basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of 
merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future 
deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Act does not specify how to calculate a dumping margin 
for a respondent that is not selected for individual review in an 
administrative review. Therefore, we look to section 735(c)(5)(A) of 
the Act, which explains how to calculate the ``all others'' rate in 
an investigation, for guidance. Consistent with how we would 
calculate the ``all others'' rate in an investigation, we are basing 
the dumping margin for non-selected companies on the weighted-
average dumping margin calculated for the selected respondent, Shin 
Yang.
    \7\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted in the ``Final Determination of No Shipments'' section, 
above, Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of 
merchandise produced by Sheng Yu, Tension Steel, Yieh Hsing, or P&J, 
but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate 
reseller, if applicable, or at the all-others rate.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon

[[Page 3620]]

publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific 
company listed above will be equal to the rate established in the final 
results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by 
producers or exporters not covered in this review, including the 
companies Commerce has determined had no shipments in these final 
results, but covered in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment in which the company was 
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to 
be 9.70 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV 
investigation.\8\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 
from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order, 49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and increase the subsequent assessment 
of double antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties Regarding Administrative Protective 
Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: January 14, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-00951 Filed 1-21-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.