Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Clearing Rules To Reflect the ISDA NTCE Supplement, 3724-3727 [2020-00915]

Download as PDF 3724 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices • Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility: • Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used. • Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and • Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Agency: DOL–MSHA. Title of Collection: Safety Standards for Underground Coal Mine Ventilation—Belt Entry Used as an Intake Air Course to Ventilate Working Sections and Areas Where Mechanized Mining Equipment is Being Installed or Removed. OMB Control Number: 1219–0138. Affected Public: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits. Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 12. Total Estimated Number of Responses: 161. Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 2,478 hours. Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $38,640. Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). Dated: January 15, 2020. Frederick Licari, Departmental Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–00990 Filed 1–21–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents The Commission is noticing a recent Postal Service filing concerning the calculation of the assumed Federal income tax on competitive products income for Fiscal Year 2019. This notice informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. DATES: Comments are due: March 4, 2020. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P POSTAL SERVICE Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting I. Introduction STATUS: In accordance with 39 U.S.C. 3634 and 39 CFR 3060.40 et seq., the Postal Service filed its calculation of the assumed Federal income tax on competitive products income for fiscal year (FY) 2019.1 The calculation details the FY 2019 competitive product revenue and expenses, the competitive products net income before tax, and the assumed Federal income tax on that net income. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: January 17, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. PLACE: II. Notice of Commission Action In accordance with 39 CFR 3060.42, the Commission establishes Docket No. T2020–1 to review the calculation of the assumed Federal income tax and supporting documentation. The Commission invites comments on whether the Postal Service’s filing in this docket is consistent with the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3634 and 39 CFR 3060.40 et seq. Comments are due no later than March 4, 2020. The Postal Service’s filing can be accessed via the Commission’s website (https:// www.prc.gov). The Commission appoints Jennaca D. Upperman to serve as Public Representative in this docket. It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. T2020–1 to consider the calculation of the assumed Federal income tax on competitive products for FY 2019. 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Jennaca D. Upperman is appointed to serve as an officer of the Commission to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding (Public Representative). 3. Comments are due no later than March 4, 2020. SUMMARY: [FR Doc. 2020–00932 Filed 1–21–20; 8:45 am] TIME AND DATE: [Docket No. T2020–1; Order No. 5406] Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. By the Commission. Ruth Ann Abrams, Acting Secretary. I. Introduction II. Notice of Commission Action III. Ordering Paragraphs III. Ordering Paragraphs AGENCY: 4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION Income Tax Review khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. ADDRESSES: Washington, DC. Closed. 1. Administrative Matters. 2. Financial Matters. 3. Strategic Matters. 4. Personnel Matters. On January 17, 2020, a majority of the members of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service voted unanimously to hold and to close to public observation a special meeting in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Board determined that no earlier public notice was practicable. General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael J. Elston, Acting Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260–1000. Telephone: (202) 268– 4800. Michael J. Elston, Acting Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–01116 Filed 1–17–20; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–87971; File No. SR–ICC– 2019–013] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Clearing Rules To Reflect the ISDA NTCE Supplement January 15, 2020. I. Introduction 1 See Notice of the United States Postal Service of Submission of the Calculation of the FY 2019 Assumed Federal Income Tax on Competitive Products, January 10, 2020. PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On November 15, 2019, ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICE Clear Credit’’ or ‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities and E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1 and Rule 19b– 4thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to make certain changes to the ICC Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’) 3 to implement the 2019 Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions (the ‘‘NTCE Supplement’’) that are being adopted in the broader credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’) market to address socalled narrowly tailored credit events and related matters. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 2, 2019.4 The Commission did not receive comments on the proposed rule change. II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change A. Background Following certain events in the CDS 5 market, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (‘‘ISDA’’), in consultation with market participants, developed and published the NTCE Supplement.6 The NTCE Supplement reflects an effort by ISDA to address so-called narrowly-tailored credit events. According to ISDA, a narrowly-tailored credit event is an arrangement between a participant in the CDS marketplace and a corporation, through which the corporation triggers a credit event on CDS covering the corporation, thereby increasing payment to the buyers of CDS protection on the corporation while minimizing the impact on the corporation.7 The NTCE Supplement, if applied to a CDS transaction, would make two principal changes to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions to address 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings specified in the Rules. 4 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87612 (November 25, 2019), 84 FR 66036 (Dec. 2, 2019) (SR–ICC–2019–013) (‘‘Notice’’). 5 The following description is substantially excerpted from the Notice. See Notice, FR at 66036. 6 See ISDA Board Statement on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events available at https:// www.isda.org/2018/04/11/isda-board-statement-onnarrowly-tailored-credit-events/; see also Joint Statement on Opportunistic Strategies in the Credit Derivatives Market (‘‘The continued pursuit of various opportunistic strategies in the credit derivatives markets, including but not limited to those that have been referred to as ‘manufactured credit events,’ may adversely affect the integrity, confidence and reputation of the credit derivatives markets, as well as markets more generally.’’) available at https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2019-106. 7 See ISDA Board Statement on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events, available at https:// www.isda.org/2018/04/11/isda-board-statement-onnarrowly-tailored-credit-events/. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 2 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 narrowly-tailored credit events.8 First, the NTCE Supplement would change the definition of the ‘‘Failure to Pay’’ credit event to exclude certain narrowly tailored credit events through a new Credit Deterioration Requirement. The Credit Deterioration Requirement would provide that a failure of a corporation to make a payment on an obligation would not constitute a Failure to Pay Credit Event triggering CDS on that corporation if the failure does not directly or indirectly either result from, or result in, a deterioration in the creditworthiness or financial condition of the corporation.9 Thus, a narrowly tailored or manufactured failure to pay that does not reflect or result in a credit deterioration by a corporation would not constitute a Credit Event for CDS Contracts that incorporate the NTCE Supplement and thus would not necessarily trigger payment to buyers of CDS protection. The NTCE Supplement would also provide guidance related to the factors that would be relevant to determining whether the Credit Deterioration Requirement had been met, which determination would, under the 2014 Definitions, in the ordinary course be made by the relevant Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee. Second, the NTCE Supplement would reduce the amount of payout a CDS protection buyer could claim in certain circumstances by imposing a new provision for Fallback Discounting. Fallback Discounting would discount a CDS protection buyer’s claim for payout under a CDS contract where that claim for payout is based on an obligation issued by a corporation at a discount.10 This would address the potential scenario where a corporation agrees to issue a bond at a substantial discount to its principal amount and the bond is delivered in settlement of a CDS at its full principal amount. In this scenario, Fallback Discounting would prevent a buyer of CDS protection from using the full principal amount of the bond issued at a discount as a basis for payout under the CDS contract. B. Changes to the ICC Clearing Rules Because ICC will clear and settle CDS contracts to which the NTCE Supplement will apply, it must ensure that its relevant Rules accurately reflect the changes described above that will be 8 See ISDA 2019 NTCE Protocol FAQ, available at https://www.isda.org/protocol/isda-2019-ntceprotocol. 9 See ISDA 2019 Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions (Published on July 15, 2019), available at https://www.isda.org/a/KDqME/Final-NTCESupplement.pdf. 10 Id. PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3725 implemented by the NTCE Supplement. Accordingly, the proposed rule change would ensure that the changes being implemented by the NTCE Supplement are accurately reflected in its relevant Rules for both new and existing cleared transactions that incorporate the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions.11 For this purpose, the proposed ICC amendments will apply to all cleared CDS contracts with corporate (i.e., nonsovereign) reference entities.12 Specifically, ICC would amend Rule 20–102 to include new definitions for (i) the ‘‘NTCE Supplement,’’ which would be the Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions published by ISDA on July 15, 2019, (ii) ‘‘NTCE Amending Contracts,’’ which would be those Contracts being amended to incorporate the NTCE Supplement as specified in a list to be maintained by ICC, and (iii) the ‘‘NTCE Effective Date,’’ which will be January 27, 2020 (the date of implementation of the amendment), or such later date as designated by ICC by Circular.13 In addition, ICC would amend each relevant subchapter of Chapter 26 of the Rules to implement the NTCE Supplement and ensure that relevant contracts already being cleared and settled by ICE Clear Credit but that do not reference the new standard terms supplement are fungible with new contracts cleared and settled by ICE Clear Credit that do reference the new standard terms supplement.14 One set of amendments would apply to index CDS transactions and a separate but substantially similar set of amendments would apply to single-name CDS transactions.15 In the case of index CDS, for CDX.NA Index CDS transactions, the definition of CDX.NA Untranched Terms Supplement in Rule 26A–102 in subchapter 26A would be amended to include the new 2020 standard terms supplement for such transactions, as published by ISDA, which incorporates the NTCE Supplement, along with conforming changes to crossreferences.16 Rule 26A–316 would be amended by adding a new paragraph (e), which provides that open positions in CDX.NA Untranched Contracts that are NTCE Amending Contracts would be amended, effective as of the NTCE Effective Date, to reference the updated 2020 standard terms supplement in lieu 11 Notice, 84 FR at 66037. 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 Id. 15 Id. 16 Id. E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1 3726 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES of the standard terms supplement previously in effect.17 This will have the effect of converting all existing CDX.NA Untranched Contracts to reference the new standard terms supplement, such that they will be fungible with new CDX.NA Untranched Contracts, which will also reference the new standard terms supplement.18 New paragraph (e) would also provide that the amendments will be effective regardless of whether any transaction record in the Deriv/SERV warehouse is updated to reflect the change.19 Substantially similar changes for other categories of index CDS would also be made in subchapters 26F (for iTraxx Europe Untranched Contracts) and 26J (for iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts).20 In the case of single-name CDS, for Standard North American Corporate (SNAC) Contracts, in subchapter 26B, Rule 26B–616 would be amended by adding a new paragraph (c), which provides that open positions in SNAC Contracts that are NTCE Amending Contracts would be amended, effective as of the NTCE Effective Date, to incorporate the NTCE Supplement and specify that the Fallback Discounting and Credit Deterioration Requirement provisions will be applicable.21 The contracts would also be amended to reference the new ISDA physical settlement matrix, to be published as of the NTCE Effective Date (or other relevant implementation date as determined by ICC).22 The amendments will have the effect of converting existing SNAC Contracts to reference the updated physical settlement matrix, such that they will be fungible with new SNAC Contracts, which will also reference that matrix.23 New paragraph (c) would also provide that the amendments will be effective regardless of whether any transaction record in the Deriv/SERV warehouse is updated to reflect the change.24 Substantially similar changes for other categories of single-name CDS would also be made in subchapters 26G (for Standard European Corporate Contracts), 26H (for Standard European Financial Corporate Contracts), 26M (for Standard Australian Corporate Contracts), 26N (for Standard Australia Financial Corporate Contracts), 26O (for Standard Asia Corporate Contracts), 26P 17 Id. 18 Id. (for Standard Asia Financial Corporate Contracts) and 26Q (for Standard Emerging Market Corporate Contracts).25 III. Commission Findings Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the organization.26 For the reasons given below, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 27 and Rule 17Ad–22(d)(1) thereunder.28 A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that the rules of ICC be designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or control of ICC or for which it is responsible, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.29 As described above, the NTCE Supplement would amend the underlying legal terms applicable to CDS contracts to which it applies by, among other things, limiting Credit Events to those that reflect a deterioration in the creditworthiness or financial condition of the relevant company. It also would reduce the amount of payout a CDS protection buyer could claim in certain circumstances where the claim for payout is based on an obligation issued by a company at a discount. Further, because ISDA has set an implementation date of January 27, 2020, the NTCE Supplement will apply to all single-name CDS contracts and components of index CDS contracts that incorporate the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions entered into on or after that date. As noted above, because ICC will clear and settle CDS contracts that are subject to the changes being made by the NTCE Supplement, the proposed rule change would amend the ICC Clearing Rules to incorporate the amendments resulting from the NTCE Supplement, thereby ensuring that ICC’s 19 Id. 20 Id. 25 Notice, 21 Id. 26 15 84 FR at 66037–66038. U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C). 27 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 28 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(1). 29 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). 22 Id. 23 Id. 24 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Rules accurately reflect and appropriately apply the legal terms and conditions applicable to such CDS contracts, and that existing contracts that do not reference the new standard terms supplement will be fungible with new contract that do. In the Commission’s view, a lack of clarity in the underlying legal terms and conditions applicable to the transactions that ICC clears and settles could hinder ICC’s ability to promptly and accurately clear and settle such transactions. Likewise, disputes regarding the applicable legal terms and conditions of such transactions could lead to disputes or confusion regarding the necessary and appropriate margin submitted in connection with such transactions, thereby threatening ICC’s ability to safeguard such margin. Accordingly, by making the changes described above, and in particular by ensuring the ICC’s Rules accurately reflect and appropriately apply the legal terms and conditions applicable to the CDS contracts that are cleared and settled by ICC and that existing contracts that do not reference the new standard terms supplement will be fungible with new contract that do, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change would help ensure that ICC’s Rules continue to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of such the CDS contracts and assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in ICC’s custody and control. For these same reasons the Commission also finds that the proposed rule change would, in general, protect investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.30 B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad–22(d)(1) Rule 17Ad–22(d)(1) requires a clearing agency to establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to provide for a well-founded, transparent and enforceable legal framework for each aspect of its activities in all relevant jurisdictions.31 As discussed above, the proposed rule change would help to clarify and ensure that ICC’s Rules accurately reflect and appropriately apply the legal terms and conditions applicable to the CDS contracts that are cleared and settled by ICC and that existing contracts that do not reference the new standard terms supplement will be fungible with new contract that do. The Commission believes that this, in turn, would help 30 15 31 17 E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(1). 22JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2020 / Notices ensure that the ICC Clearing Rules provide a consistent and enforceable legal basis for clearing and settling CDS contracts to which the NTCE Supplement applies in light of the amendments made by the NTCE Supplement. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 17Ad–22(d)(1). IV. Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 32 and Rule 17Ad–22(d)(1) thereunder.33 It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 34 that the proposed rule change (SR–ICC–2019– 013), be, and hereby is, approved.35 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.36 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–00915 Filed 1–21–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–87978; File No. SR– NYSEArca–2020–03] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges To Introduce a New Lead Market Maker Credit January 15, 2020. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on January 2, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to 32 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F). CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(1). 34 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 35 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission considered the proposal’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 36 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 33 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:42 Jan 21, 2020 Jkt 250001 solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to (1) introduce a new Lead Market Maker (‘‘LMM’’) credit, (2) introduce a new LMM rebate, and (3) replace the rebate applicable to ETP Holders and Market Makers with a monthly rebate payable on a persecurity basis that is tied to quoting requirements in NYSE Arca-listed securities. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective January 2, 2020. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to (1) introduce a new LMM 3 credit, (2) introduce a new LMM rebate, and (3) replace the rebate applicable to ETP Holders 4 with a monthly rebate payable on a persecurity basis that is tied to quoting requirements in NYSE Arca-listed securities. The proposed changes respond to the current competitive environment where order flow providers have a choice of where to direct liquidity-providing orders by offering further incentives for ETP Holders and LMMs to send 3 The term ‘‘Lead Market Maker’’ is defined in Rule 1.1(w) to mean a registered Market Maker that is the exclusive Designated Market Maker in listings for which the Exchange is the primary market. 4 All references to ETP Holders in connection with this proposed fee change include Market Makers. PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 3727 additional displayed liquidity to the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes effective January 2, 2020. Background The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 5 As the Commission itself recognized, the market for trading services in NMS stocks has become ‘‘more fragmented and competitive.’’ 6 Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 13 exchanges,7 31 alternative trading systems,8 and numerous broker-dealer internalizers and wholesalers, all competing for order flow. Based on publicly-available information for November 2019, no single exchange has more than 18% market share (whether including or excluding auction volume).9 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of equity order flow. More specifically, in November 2019, the Exchange had 7.6% market share of executed volume of equity trades (excluding auction volume).10 The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can move order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of products. While it is not possible to know a firm’s reason for shifting order flow, the Exchange believes that one such reason is because of fee changes at any of the registered exchanges or non5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 84 FR 5202, 5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7– 05–18) (Final Rule). 7 See Cboe U.S Equities Market Volume Summary, available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/ equities/market_share. See generally https:// www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmr exchangesshtml.html. 8 See FINRA ATS Transparency Data, available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/ AtsIssueData. A list of alternative trading systems registered with the Commission is available at https://www.sec.gov/foia/docs/atslist.htm. 9 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary, available at https:// markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. 10 See id. E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM 22JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3724-3727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87971; File No. SR-ICC-2019-013]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order 
Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to the ICC Clearing Rules To 
Reflect the ISDA NTCE Supplement

January 15, 2020.

I. Introduction

    On November 15, 2019, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICE Clear Credit'' or 
``ICC'') filed with the Securities and

[[Page 3725]]

Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule 
change to make certain changes to the ICC Clearing Rules (the 
``Rules'') \3\ to implement the 2019 Narrowly Tailored Credit Event 
Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions (the ``NTCE 
Supplement'') that are being adopted in the broader credit default swap 
(``CDS'') market to address so-called narrowly tailored credit events 
and related matters. The proposed rule change was published for comment 
in the Federal Register on December 2, 2019.\4\ The Commission did not 
receive comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the 
meanings specified in the Rules.
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87612 (November 25, 
2019), 84 FR 66036 (Dec. 2, 2019) (SR-ICC-2019-013) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

A. Background

    Following certain events in the CDS \5\ market, the International 
Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (``ISDA''), in consultation 
with market participants, developed and published the NTCE 
Supplement.\6\ The NTCE Supplement reflects an effort by ISDA to 
address so-called narrowly-tailored credit events. According to ISDA, a 
narrowly-tailored credit event is an arrangement between a participant 
in the CDS marketplace and a corporation, through which the corporation 
triggers a credit event on CDS covering the corporation, thereby 
increasing payment to the buyers of CDS protection on the corporation 
while minimizing the impact on the corporation.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The following description is substantially excerpted from 
the Notice. See Notice, FR at 66036.
    \6\ See ISDA Board Statement on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events 
available at https://www.isda.org/2018/04/11/isda-board-statement-on-narrowly-tailored-credit-events/; see also Joint Statement on 
Opportunistic Strategies in the Credit Derivatives Market (``The 
continued pursuit of various opportunistic strategies in the credit 
derivatives markets, including but not limited to those that have 
been referred to as `manufactured credit events,' may adversely 
affect the integrity, confidence and reputation of the credit 
derivatives markets, as well as markets more generally.'') available 
at https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2019-106.
    \7\ See ISDA Board Statement on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events, 
available at https://www.isda.org/2018/04/11/isda-board-statement-on-narrowly-tailored-credit-events/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The NTCE Supplement, if applied to a CDS transaction, would make 
two principal changes to the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions 
to address narrowly-tailored credit events.\8\ First, the NTCE 
Supplement would change the definition of the ``Failure to Pay'' credit 
event to exclude certain narrowly tailored credit events through a new 
Credit Deterioration Requirement. The Credit Deterioration Requirement 
would provide that a failure of a corporation to make a payment on an 
obligation would not constitute a Failure to Pay Credit Event 
triggering CDS on that corporation if the failure does not directly or 
indirectly either result from, or result in, a deterioration in the 
creditworthiness or financial condition of the corporation.\9\ Thus, a 
narrowly tailored or manufactured failure to pay that does not reflect 
or result in a credit deterioration by a corporation would not 
constitute a Credit Event for CDS Contracts that incorporate the NTCE 
Supplement and thus would not necessarily trigger payment to buyers of 
CDS protection. The NTCE Supplement would also provide guidance related 
to the factors that would be relevant to determining whether the Credit 
Deterioration Requirement had been met, which determination would, 
under the 2014 Definitions, in the ordinary course be made by the 
relevant Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See ISDA 2019 NTCE Protocol FAQ, available at https://www.isda.org/protocol/isda-2019-ntce-protocol.
    \9\ See ISDA 2019 Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to 
the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions (Published on July 15, 
2019), available at https://www.isda.org/a/KDqME/Final-NTCE-Supplement.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the NTCE Supplement would reduce the amount of payout a CDS 
protection buyer could claim in certain circumstances by imposing a new 
provision for Fallback Discounting. Fallback Discounting would discount 
a CDS protection buyer's claim for payout under a CDS contract where 
that claim for payout is based on an obligation issued by a corporation 
at a discount.\10\ This would address the potential scenario where a 
corporation agrees to issue a bond at a substantial discount to its 
principal amount and the bond is delivered in settlement of a CDS at 
its full principal amount. In this scenario, Fallback Discounting would 
prevent a buyer of CDS protection from using the full principal amount 
of the bond issued at a discount as a basis for payout under the CDS 
contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Changes to the ICC Clearing Rules

    Because ICC will clear and settle CDS contracts to which the NTCE 
Supplement will apply, it must ensure that its relevant Rules 
accurately reflect the changes described above that will be implemented 
by the NTCE Supplement. Accordingly, the proposed rule change would 
ensure that the changes being implemented by the NTCE Supplement are 
accurately reflected in its relevant Rules for both new and existing 
cleared transactions that incorporate the 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives 
Definitions.\11\ For this purpose, the proposed ICC amendments will 
apply to all cleared CDS contracts with corporate (i.e., non-sovereign) 
reference entities.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Notice, 84 FR at 66037.
    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, ICC would amend Rule 20-102 to include new 
definitions for (i) the ``NTCE Supplement,'' which would be the 
Narrowly Tailored Credit Event Supplement to the 2014 ISDA Credit 
Derivatives Definitions published by ISDA on July 15, 2019, (ii) ``NTCE 
Amending Contracts,'' which would be those Contracts being amended to 
incorporate the NTCE Supplement as specified in a list to be maintained 
by ICC, and (iii) the ``NTCE Effective Date,'' which will be January 
27, 2020 (the date of implementation of the amendment), or such later 
date as designated by ICC by Circular.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, ICC would amend each relevant subchapter of Chapter 26 
of the Rules to implement the NTCE Supplement and ensure that relevant 
contracts already being cleared and settled by ICE Clear Credit but 
that do not reference the new standard terms supplement are fungible 
with new contracts cleared and settled by ICE Clear Credit that do 
reference the new standard terms supplement.\14\ One set of amendments 
would apply to index CDS transactions and a separate but substantially 
similar set of amendments would apply to single-name CDS 
transactions.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id.
    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the case of index CDS, for CDX.NA Index CDS transactions, the 
definition of CDX.NA Untranched Terms Supplement in Rule 26A-102 in 
subchapter 26A would be amended to include the new 2020 standard terms 
supplement for such transactions, as published by ISDA, which 
incorporates the NTCE Supplement, along with conforming changes to 
cross-references.\16\ Rule 26A-316 would be amended by adding a new 
paragraph (e), which provides that open positions in CDX.NA Untranched 
Contracts that are NTCE Amending Contracts would be amended, effective 
as of the NTCE Effective Date, to reference the updated 2020 standard 
terms supplement in lieu

[[Page 3726]]

of the standard terms supplement previously in effect.\17\ This will 
have the effect of converting all existing CDX.NA Untranched Contracts 
to reference the new standard terms supplement, such that they will be 
fungible with new CDX.NA Untranched Contracts, which will also 
reference the new standard terms supplement.\18\ New paragraph (e) 
would also provide that the amendments will be effective regardless of 
whether any transaction record in the Deriv/SERV warehouse is updated 
to reflect the change.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Id.
    \17\ Id.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Substantially similar changes for other categories of index CDS 
would also be made in subchapters 26F (for iTraxx Europe Untranched 
Contracts) and 26J (for iTraxx Asia/Pacific Untranched Contracts).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the case of single-name CDS, for Standard North American 
Corporate (SNAC) Contracts, in subchapter 26B, Rule 26B-616 would be 
amended by adding a new paragraph (c), which provides that open 
positions in SNAC Contracts that are NTCE Amending Contracts would be 
amended, effective as of the NTCE Effective Date, to incorporate the 
NTCE Supplement and specify that the Fallback Discounting and Credit 
Deterioration Requirement provisions will be applicable.\21\ The 
contracts would also be amended to reference the new ISDA physical 
settlement matrix, to be published as of the NTCE Effective Date (or 
other relevant implementation date as determined by ICC).\22\ The 
amendments will have the effect of converting existing SNAC Contracts 
to reference the updated physical settlement matrix, such that they 
will be fungible with new SNAC Contracts, which will also reference 
that matrix.\23\ New paragraph (c) would also provide that the 
amendments will be effective regardless of whether any transaction 
record in the Deriv/SERV warehouse is updated to reflect the 
change.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Substantially similar changes for other categories of single-name 
CDS would also be made in subchapters 26G (for Standard European 
Corporate Contracts), 26H (for Standard European Financial Corporate 
Contracts), 26M (for Standard Australian Corporate Contracts), 26N (for 
Standard Australia Financial Corporate Contracts), 26O (for Standard 
Asia Corporate Contracts), 26P (for Standard Asia Financial Corporate 
Contracts) and 26Q (for Standard Emerging Market Corporate 
Contracts).\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Notice, 84 FR at 66037-66038.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Commission Findings

    Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a 
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that 
the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the 
organization.\26\ For the reasons given below, the Commission finds 
that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) 
of the Act \27\ and Rule 17Ad-22(d)(1) thereunder.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Consistency With Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act

    Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires, among other things, that 
the rules of ICC be designed to promote the prompt and accurate 
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent 
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to 
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the 
custody or control of ICC or for which it is responsible, and, in 
general, to protect investors and the public interest.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, the NTCE Supplement would amend the underlying 
legal terms applicable to CDS contracts to which it applies by, among 
other things, limiting Credit Events to those that reflect a 
deterioration in the creditworthiness or financial condition of the 
relevant company. It also would reduce the amount of payout a CDS 
protection buyer could claim in certain circumstances where the claim 
for payout is based on an obligation issued by a company at a discount. 
Further, because ISDA has set an implementation date of January 27, 
2020, the NTCE Supplement will apply to all single-name CDS contracts 
and components of index CDS contracts that incorporate the 2014 ISDA 
Credit Derivatives Definitions entered into on or after that date.
    As noted above, because ICC will clear and settle CDS contracts 
that are subject to the changes being made by the NTCE Supplement, the 
proposed rule change would amend the ICC Clearing Rules to incorporate 
the amendments resulting from the NTCE Supplement, thereby ensuring 
that ICC's Rules accurately reflect and appropriately apply the legal 
terms and conditions applicable to such CDS contracts, and that 
existing contracts that do not reference the new standard terms 
supplement will be fungible with new contract that do.
    In the Commission's view, a lack of clarity in the underlying legal 
terms and conditions applicable to the transactions that ICC clears and 
settles could hinder ICC's ability to promptly and accurately clear and 
settle such transactions. Likewise, disputes regarding the applicable 
legal terms and conditions of such transactions could lead to disputes 
or confusion regarding the necessary and appropriate margin submitted 
in connection with such transactions, thereby threatening ICC's ability 
to safeguard such margin. Accordingly, by making the changes described 
above, and in particular by ensuring the ICC's Rules accurately reflect 
and appropriately apply the legal terms and conditions applicable to 
the CDS contracts that are cleared and settled by ICC and that existing 
contracts that do not reference the new standard terms supplement will 
be fungible with new contract that do, the Commission believes that the 
proposed rule change would help ensure that ICC's Rules continue to 
promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of such the 
CDS contracts and assure the safeguarding of securities and funds in 
ICC's custody and control. For these same reasons the Commission also 
finds that the proposed rule change would, in general, protect 
investors and the public interest.
    Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Consistency With Rule 17Ad-22(d)(1)

    Rule 17Ad-22(d)(1) requires a clearing agency to establish, 
implement, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures 
reasonably designed to provide for a well-founded, transparent and 
enforceable legal framework for each aspect of its activities in all 
relevant jurisdictions.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the proposed rule change would help to clarify 
and ensure that ICC's Rules accurately reflect and appropriately apply 
the legal terms and conditions applicable to the CDS contracts that are 
cleared and settled by ICC and that existing contracts that do not 
reference the new standard terms supplement will be fungible with new 
contract that do. The Commission believes that this, in turn, would 
help

[[Page 3727]]

ensure that the ICC Clearing Rules provide a consistent and enforceable 
legal basis for clearing and settling CDS contracts to which the NTCE 
Supplement applies in light of the amendments made by the NTCE 
Supplement.
    Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is 
consistent with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(1).

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, 
and in particular, with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the 
Act \32\ and Rule 17Ad-22(d)(1) thereunder.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \33\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 
\34\ that the proposed rule change (SR-ICC-2019-013), be, and hereby 
is, approved.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \35\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission 
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and 
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-00915 Filed 1-21-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.