Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified Income Fund, et al., 2465-2468 [2020-00451]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2020 / Notices
NMS feeds at no additional charge. By
offering the NMS network as part of
these existing services, the Exchange
proposes to offer an additional choice to
such Users for how they could connect
to the NMS feeds. By not charging any
different fees for such expanded service,
all Users will be treated equally and no
differently than how fees are currently
charged for a 10 Gb or 40 Gb connection
to a local area network service.
For the reasons above, the proposed
changes would not unfairly discriminate
between or among market participants
that are otherwise capable of satisfying
any applicable co-location fees,
requirements, terms and conditions
established from time to time by the
Exchange.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change would not impose any
burden on competition because it is not
designed to address any competitive
issues. As described above, SIAC is the
single plan processor for Tape A and B
equities securities and all options
securities and does not currently
compete with any other providers for
these processor services. The proposed
rule change would amend the services
available in co-location to include the
NMS network when a User purchases a
10 Gb or 40 Gb connection to access
either local area network service.
Accordingly, the proposed rule change
would expand the services available in
co-location without changing any fees
for the existing services, or adding fees
for the expanded services. All Users
would have access to the NMS network
and it would be their choice of whether
and at what level to subscribe to such
services, including whether to utilize
the NMS network connection.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change
would place any User at a relative
disadvantage compared to other Users.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended by Amendment No.
1, is consistent with the Act. Comments
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSENAT–2019–19 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSENAT–2019–19. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSENAT–2019–19 and
should be submitted on or before
February 5, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2465
For the Commission, by the Division
of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.29
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–00485 Filed 1–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
33743; 812–15081]
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified
Income Fund, et al.
January 9, 2020.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application under section
6(c) of the Investment Company Act of
1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from
sections 18(a)(2), 18(c), and 18(i) of the
Act, under sections 6(c) and 23(c) of the
Act for an exemption from rule 23c–3
under the Act, and for an order pursuant
to section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–
1 under the Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order to permit certain
registered closed-end management
investment companies to issue multiple
classes of shares and to impose assetbased service and distribution fees, and
early withdrawal charges (‘‘EWCs’’).
APPLICANTS: Goldman Sachs Real Estate
Diversified Income Fund and Goldman
Sachs Credit Income Fund (the ‘‘Initial
Funds’’), Goldman Sachs Asset
Management, LP (the ‘‘Adviser’’), and
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (the
‘‘Distributor’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on December 11, 2019.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on February 3, 2020, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of
an affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under
the Act, hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, any
facts bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
29 17
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
15JAN1
2466
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2020 / Notices
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090;
Applicants: 200 West Street, New York,
NY 10282.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edward J. Rubenstein, Senior Special
Counsel, at (202) 551–6854, or Kaitlin C.
Bottock, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–
6825 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Applicants’ Representations
1. The Goldman Sachs Real Estate
Diversified Income Fund (the ‘‘GS Real
Estate Fund’’) is a Delaware statutory
trust that is registered under the Act and
will operate as a diversified, closed-end
management investment company. The
GS Real Estate Fund will operate as an
‘‘interval fund’’ pursuant to rule 23c–3
under the Act and intends to
continuously offer its shares.
2. The Goldman Sachs Credit Income
Fund (the ‘‘GS Credit Fund’’) is a
Delaware statutory trust that is
registered under the Act and will
operate as a diversified closed-end
management investment company. The
GS Credit Fund will operate as an
‘‘interval fund’’ pursuant to rule 23c–3
under the Act and intends to
continuously offer its shares.
3. The Adviser is a Delaware limited
liability partnership registered as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The
Adviser will serve as investment adviser
to the Initial Funds.
4. The Distributor is registered with
the Commission as a broker-dealer
under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’), and will act
as the distributor of the Initial Funds.
5. Applicants seek an order to permit
the Initial Funds to issue multiple
classes of shares, each having its own
fee and expense structure, and to
impose asset-based distribution and
service fees, and EWCs.
6. Applicants request that the order
also apply to any continuously offered
registered closed-end management
investment company that has been
previously organized or that may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
organized in the future for which the
Adviser or the Distributor or any entity
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with the Adviser or the
Distributor, or any successor in interest
to any such entity,1 acts as investment
adviser or principal underwriter,
respectively, and which operates as an
interval fund pursuant to rule 23c–3
under the Act or provides periodic
liquidity with respect to its shares
pursuant to rule 13e–4 under the
Exchange Act (each, a ‘‘Future Fund’’
and together with the Initial Fund, the
‘‘Funds’’).2
7. Each Initial Fund will make a
continuous public offering of its shares.
Applicants state that additional
offerings by any Fund relying on the
order may be on a private placement or
public offering basis. Shares of the
Funds will not be listed on any
securities exchange, nor quoted on any
quotation medium. The Funds do not
expect there to be a secondary trading
market for their shares.
8. If the requested relief is granted, the
GS Real Estate Fund expects to offer at
least eight classes of shares and the GS
Credit Fund expects to offer at least five
classes of shares. The Initial Funds may
also offer additional classes of shares in
the future, with each class having its
own fee and expense structure.
9. Applicants state that, from time to
time, the Funds may create additional
classes of shares, the terms of which
may differ from the initial class
pursuant to and in compliance with rule
18f–3 under the Act.
10. Applicants state that shares of a
Fund may be subject to a repurchase fee
at a rate of no greater than 2% of the
shareholder’s repurchase proceeds if the
interval between the date of purchase of
the shares and the valuation date with
respect to the repurchase of those shares
is less than one year. Any repurchase
fee will apply equally to all classes of
shares of a Fund, consistent with
section 18 of the Act and rule 18f–3
thereunder. Further, applicants
represent that to the extent a Fund
determines to waive, impose scheduled
variations of, or eliminate any
repurchase fee, it will do so consistently
with the requirements of rule 22d–1
under the Act as if the repurchase fee
were a CDSL (defined below) and as if
the Fund were an open-end investment
1 A successor in interest is limited to an entity
that results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization.
2 Any Fund relying on this relief in the future will
do so in compliance with the terms and conditions
of the application. Applicants represent that each
entity presently intending to rely on the requested
relief is listed as an applicant.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
company and the Fund’s waiver of,
scheduled variation in, or elimination
of, any such repurchase fee will apply
uniformly to all shareholders of the
Fund regardless of class.
11. Applicants state that the Initial
Funds will adopt a fundamental policy
to repurchase a specified percentage of
its shares (no less than 5% and not more
than 25%) at net asset value on a
periodic basis. Such repurchase offers
will be conducted pursuant to rule 23c–
3 under the Act.3 Each Future Fund will
likewise adopt a fundamental
investment policy in compliance with
rule 23c–3 and make periodic
repurchase offers to its shareholders, or
provide periodic liquidity with respect
to its shares pursuant to rule 13e–4
under the Exchange Act. Any
repurchase offers made by the Funds
will be made to all holders of shares of
each such Fund.
12. Applicants represent that any
asset-based service and/or distribution
fees for each class of shares will comply
with the provisions of FINRA Rule 2341
(‘‘Sales Charge Rule’’).4 Applicants also
represent that each Fund will disclose
in its prospectus the fees, expenses, and
other characteristics of each class of
shares offered for sale by the prospectus,
as is required for open-end multiple
class funds under Form N–1A. As is
required for open-end funds, each Fund
will disclose its expenses in shareholder
reports, and describe any arrangements
that result in breakpoints in or
elimination of sales loads in its
prospectus.5 In addition, applicants will
comply with applicable enhanced fee
disclosure requirements for fund of
funds, including registered funds of
hedge funds.6
13. Each of the Funds will comply
with any requirements that the
3 Applicants submit that rule 23c–3 and
Regulation M under the Exchange Act permit an
interval fund to make repurchase offers to
repurchase its shares while engaging in a
continuous offering of its shares pursuant to rule
415 under the Securities Act of 1933.
4 Any reference to the Sales Charge Rule includes
any successor or replacement rule that may be
adopted by the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (‘‘FINRA’’).
5 See Shareholder Reports and Quarterly Portfolio
Disclosure of Registered Management Investment
Companies, Investment Company Act Release No.
26372 (Feb. 27, 2004) (adopting release) (requiring
open-end investment companies to disclose fund
expenses in shareholder reports); and Disclosure of
Breakpoint Discounts by Mutual Funds, Investment
Company Act Release No. 26464 (June 7, 2004)
(adopting release) (requiring open-end investment
companies to provide prospectus disclosure of
certain sales load information).
6 Fund of Funds Investments, Investment
Company Act Rel. Nos. 26198 (Oct. 1, 2003)
(proposing release) and 27399 (Jun. 20, 2006)
(adopting release). See also Rules 12d1–1, et seq. of
the Act.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2020 / Notices
Commission or FINRA may adopt
regarding disclosure at the point of sale
and in transaction confirmations about
the costs and conflicts of interest arising
out of the distribution of open-end
investment company shares, and
regarding prospectus disclosure of sales
loads and revenue sharing
arrangements, as if those requirements
applied to each Fund. In addition, each
Fund will contractually require that any
distributor of the Fund’s shares comply
with such requirements in connection
with the distribution of such Fund’s
shares.
14. Applicants state that each Fund
may impose an EWC on shares
submitted for repurchase that have been
held less than a specified period and
may waive the EWC for certain
categories of shareholders or
transactions to be established from time
to time. Applicants state that each of the
Funds will apply the EWC (and any
waivers or scheduled variations of the
EWC) uniformly to all shareholders in a
given class and consistently with the
requirements of rule 22d–1 under the
Act as if the Funds were open-end
investment companies.
15. Each Fund operating as an interval
fund pursuant to rule 23c–3 under the
Act may offer its shareholders an
exchange feature under which the
shareholders of the Fund may, in
connection with the Fund’s periodic
repurchase offers, exchange their shares
of the Fund for shares of the same class
of (i) registered open-end investment
companies or (ii) other registered
closed-end investment companies that
comply with rule 23c–3 under the Act
and continuously offer their shares at
net asset value, that are in the Fund’s
group of investment companies
(collectively, ‘‘Other Funds’’). Shares of
a Fund operating pursuant to rule 23c–
3 that are exchanged for shares of Other
Funds will be included as part of the
amount of the repurchase offer amount
for such Fund as specified in rule 23c–
3 under the Act. Any exchange option
will comply with rule 11a–3 under the
Act, as if the Fund were an open-end
investment company subject to rule
11a–3. In complying with rule 11a–3,
each Fund will treat an EWC as if it
were a contingent deferred sales load
(‘‘CDSL’’).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
Multiple Classes of Shares
1. Section 18(a)(2) of the Act makes it
unlawful for a closed-end investment
company to issue a senior security that
is a stock unless certain requirements
are met. Applicants state that the
creation of multiple classes of shares of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
the Funds may violate section 18(a)(2)
because the Funds may not meet such
requirements with respect to a class of
shares that may be a senior security.
2. Section 18(c) of the Act provides,
in relevant part, that a registered closedend investment company may not issue
or sell any senior security if,
immediately thereafter, the company
has outstanding more than one class of
senior security. Applicants state that the
creation of multiple classes of Shares of
a Fund proposed herein may result in
Shares of a class having ‘‘priority over
[another] class as to . . . payment of
dividends,’’ and being deemed a ‘‘senior
security,’’ because shareholders of
different classes may pay different
distribution fees, different shareholder
services fees, and any other expense.
Accordingly, applicants state that the
creation of multiple classes of Shares of
a Fund with different fees and expenses
may be prohibited by section 18(c).
3. Section 18(i) of the Act provides, in
relevant part, that each share of stock
issued by a registered management
investment company will be a voting
stock and have equal voting rights with
every other outstanding voting stock.
Applicants state that multiple classes of
shares of the Funds may violate section
18(i) of the Act because each class
would be entitled to exclusive voting
rights with respect to matters solely
related to that class.
4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that
the Commission may exempt any
person, security or transaction or any
class or classes of persons, securities or
transactions from any provision of the
Act, or from any rule or regulation
under the Act, if and to the extent such
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act. Applicants
request an exemption under section 6(c)
from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) to
permit the Funds to issue multiple
classes of shares.
5. Applicants submit that the
proposed allocation of expenses relating
to distribution and voting rights among
multiple classes is equitable and will
not discriminate against any group or
class of shareholders. Applicants submit
that the proposed arrangements would
permit a Fund to facilitate the
distribution of its securities and provide
investors with a broader choice of
shareholder services. Applicants assert
that the proposed closed-end
investment company multiple class
structure does not raise the concerns
underlying section 18 of the Act to any
greater degree than open-end
investment companies’ multiple class
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2467
structures that are permitted by rule
18f–3 under the Act. Applicants state
that each Fund will comply with the
provisions of rule 18f–3 as if it were an
open-end investment company.
Early Withdrawal Charges
1. Section 23(c) of the Act provides,
in relevant part, that no registered
closed-end investment company shall
purchase securities of which it is the
issuer, except: (a) On a securities
exchange or other open market; (b)
pursuant to tenders, after reasonable
opportunity to submit tenders given to
all holders of securities of the class to
be purchased; or (c) under other
circumstances as the Commission may
permit by rules and regulations or
orders for the protection of investors.
2. Rule 23c–3 under the Act permits
an interval fund to make repurchase
offers of between five and twenty-five
percent of its outstanding shares at net
asset value at periodic intervals
pursuant to a fundamental policy of the
interval fund. Rule 23c–3(b)(1) under
the Act permits an interval fund to
deduct from repurchase proceeds only a
repurchase fee, not to exceed two
percent of the proceeds, that is paid to
the interval fund and is reasonably
intended to compensate the fund for
expenses directly related to the
repurchase.
3. Section 23(c)(3) provides that the
Commission may issue an order that
would permit a closed-end investment
company to repurchase its shares in
circumstances in which the repurchase
is made in a manner or on a basis that
does not unfairly discriminate against
any holders of the class or classes of
securities to be purchased.
4. Applicants request relief under
section 6(c), discussed above, and
section 23(c)(3) from rule 23c–3 to the
extent necessary for the Funds to
impose EWCs on shares of the Funds
submitted for repurchase that have been
held for less than a specified period.
5. Applicants state that the EWCs they
intend to impose are functionally
similar to CDSLs imposed by open-end
investment companies under rule 6c–10
under the Act. Rule 6c–10 permits openend investment companies to impose
CDSLs, subject to certain conditions.
Applicants note that rule 6c–10 is
grounded in policy considerations
supporting the employment of CDSLs
where there are adequate safeguards for
the investor and state that the same
policy considerations support
imposition of EWCs in the interval fund
context. In addition, applicants state
that EWCs may be necessary for the
distributor to recover distribution costs.
Applicants represent that any EWC
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2468
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
imposed by the Funds will comply with
rule 6c–10 under the Act as if the rule
were applicable to closed-end
investment companies. The Funds will
disclose EWCs in accordance with the
requirements of Form N–1A concerning
CDSLs.
Asset-Based Service and Distribution
Fees
1. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule
17d–1 under the Act prohibit an
affiliated person of a registered
investment company, or an affiliated
person of such person, acting as
principal, from participating in or
effecting any transaction in connection
with any joint enterprise or joint
arrangement in which the investment
company participates unless the
Commission issues an order permitting
the transaction. In reviewing
applications submitted under section
17(d) and rule 17d–1, the Commission
considers whether the participation of
the investment company in a joint
enterprise or joint arrangement is
consistent with the provisions, policies
and purposes of the Act, and the extent
to which the participation is on a basis
different from or less advantageous than
that of other participants.
2. Rule 17d–3 under the Act provides
an exemption from section 17(d) and
rule 17d–1 to permit open-end
investment companies to enter into
distribution arrangements pursuant to
rule 12b–1 under the Act. Applicants
request an order under section 17(d) and
rule 17d–1 under the Act to the extent
necessary to permit the Funds to impose
asset-based service and distribution
fees. Applicants have agreed to comply
with rules 12b–1 and 17d–3 as if those
rules applied to closed-end investment
companies, which they believe will
resolve any concerns that might arise in
connection with a Fund financing the
distribution of its shares through assetbased service and distribution fees.
3. For the reasons stated above,
applicants submit that the exemptions
requested under section 6(c) are
necessary and appropriate in the public
interest and are consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act. Applicants further
submit that the relief requested
pursuant to section 23(c)(3) will be
consistent with the protection of
investors and will insure that applicants
do not unfairly discriminate against any
holders of the class of securities to be
purchased. Finally, applicants state that
the Funds’ imposition of asset-based
service and distribution fees is
consistent with the provisions, policies,
and purposes of the Act and does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
involve participation on a basis different
from or less advantageous than that of
other participants.
Applicants’ Condition
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following condition:
Each Fund relying on the order will
comply with the provisions of rules 6c–
10, 12b–1, 17d–3, 18f–3, 22d–1, and,
where applicable, 11a–3 under the Act,
as amended from time to time, as if
those rules applied to closed-end
management investment companies,
and will comply with the Sales Charge
Rule, as amended from time to time, as
if that rule applied to all closed-end
management investment companies.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–00451 Filed 1–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87927; File No. SR–NYSE–
2019–46)
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Amendment No. 1 to
Proposed Rule Change Amending the
Exchange’s Price List Related to CoLocation Services in the Mahwah, New
Jersey Data Center
January 9, 2020.
On August 22, 2019, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend its co-location fee
schedule to offer co-location Users 3
access to the ‘‘NMS Network’’—an
alternate, dedicated network providing
connectivity to data feeds for the
National Market System Plans for which
Securities Industry Automation
Corporation (‘‘SIAC’’) is engaged as the
exclusive securities information
processor (‘‘SIP’’)—and establish
associated fees. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on September 10,
2019.4 On October 24, 2019, the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See infra note 9 defining ‘‘Users.’’
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 86865
(September 4, 2019), 84 FR 47592.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Commission extended the time period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, to
December 9, 2019.5 The Commission
received one comment letter on the
proposal, a response from the
Exchanges, and a subsequent letter from
the original commenter.6 On December
9, 2019, the Commission instituted
proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.7 On December 23, 2019,
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on Amendment No. 1
to the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
services available to Users that use colocation services in the Mahwah, New
Jersey data center to add the NMS
network to connect to the NMS feeds.
This Amendment No. 1, which
supersedes the original filing in its
entirety, is designed to address
comments in the Commission’s Order
instituting proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
original filing.8 The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 87399,
84 FR 58189 (October 30, 2019).
6 See, respectively, letter dated October 24, 2019
from John M. Yetter, Vice President and Senior
Deputy General Counsel, Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’), to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission (‘‘Nasdaq Letter’’); letter dated
November 8, 2019 from Elizabeth K. King, Chief
Regulatory Officer, ICE, General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary, NYSE to Ms. Vanessa
Countryman, Secretary, Commission (‘‘NYSE
Response Letter’’); and letter dated November 25,
2019 from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President
and Corporate Secretary, Nasdaq, to Vanessa
Countryman, Secretary, Commission (‘‘Second
Nasdaq Letter’’). All comments received by the
Commission on the proposed rule change are
available on the Commission’s website at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2019-46/srnyse
201946.htm.
7 See infra note 8.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87699
(December 9, 2019), 84 FR 68239 (December 13,
2019) (SR–NYSE–2019–46) (‘‘Order’’).
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2465-2468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00451]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 33743; 812-15081]
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified Income Fund, et al.
January 9, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'') for an exemption from sections
18(a)(2), 18(c), and 18(i) of the Act, under sections 6(c) and 23(c) of
the Act for an exemption from rule 23c-3 under the Act, and for an
order pursuant to section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the
Act.
Summary of Application: Applicants request an order to permit certain
registered closed-end management investment companies to issue multiple
classes of shares and to impose asset-based service and distribution
fees, and early withdrawal charges (``EWCs'').
Applicants: Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified Income Fund and
Goldman Sachs Credit Income Fund (the ``Initial Funds''), Goldman Sachs
Asset Management, LP (the ``Adviser''), and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
(the ``Distributor'').
Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 11, 2019.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on February 3, 2020, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of an affidavit, or, for
lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0-5 under the Act,
hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any
facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the
reason for the
[[Page 2466]]
request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by writing to the Commission's
Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090; Applicants: 200 West Street, New
York, NY 10282.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward J. Rubenstein, Senior Special
Counsel, at (202) 551-6854, or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at
(202) 551-6825 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's
Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. The Goldman Sachs Real Estate Diversified Income Fund (the ``GS
Real Estate Fund'') is a Delaware statutory trust that is registered
under the Act and will operate as a diversified, closed-end management
investment company. The GS Real Estate Fund will operate as an
``interval fund'' pursuant to rule 23c-3 under the Act and intends to
continuously offer its shares.
2. The Goldman Sachs Credit Income Fund (the ``GS Credit Fund'') is
a Delaware statutory trust that is registered under the Act and will
operate as a diversified closed-end management investment company. The
GS Credit Fund will operate as an ``interval fund'' pursuant to rule
23c-3 under the Act and intends to continuously offer its shares.
3. The Adviser is a Delaware limited liability partnership
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940. The Adviser will serve as investment adviser to the Initial
Funds.
4. The Distributor is registered with the Commission as a broker-
dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Exchange
Act''), and will act as the distributor of the Initial Funds.
5. Applicants seek an order to permit the Initial Funds to issue
multiple classes of shares, each having its own fee and expense
structure, and to impose asset-based distribution and service fees, and
EWCs.
6. Applicants request that the order also apply to any continuously
offered registered closed-end management investment company that has
been previously organized or that may be organized in the future for
which the Adviser or the Distributor or any entity controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser or the
Distributor, or any successor in interest to any such entity,\1\ acts
as investment adviser or principal underwriter, respectively, and which
operates as an interval fund pursuant to rule 23c-3 under the Act or
provides periodic liquidity with respect to its shares pursuant to rule
13e-4 under the Exchange Act (each, a ``Future Fund'' and together with
the Initial Fund, the ``Funds'').\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A successor in interest is limited to an entity that results
from a reorganization into another jurisdiction or a change in the
type of business organization.
\2\ Any Fund relying on this relief in the future will do so in
compliance with the terms and conditions of the application.
Applicants represent that each entity presently intending to rely on
the requested relief is listed as an applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Each Initial Fund will make a continuous public offering of its
shares. Applicants state that additional offerings by any Fund relying
on the order may be on a private placement or public offering basis.
Shares of the Funds will not be listed on any securities exchange, nor
quoted on any quotation medium. The Funds do not expect there to be a
secondary trading market for their shares.
8. If the requested relief is granted, the GS Real Estate Fund
expects to offer at least eight classes of shares and the GS Credit
Fund expects to offer at least five classes of shares. The Initial
Funds may also offer additional classes of shares in the future, with
each class having its own fee and expense structure.
9. Applicants state that, from time to time, the Funds may create
additional classes of shares, the terms of which may differ from the
initial class pursuant to and in compliance with rule 18f-3 under the
Act.
10. Applicants state that shares of a Fund may be subject to a
repurchase fee at a rate of no greater than 2% of the shareholder's
repurchase proceeds if the interval between the date of purchase of the
shares and the valuation date with respect to the repurchase of those
shares is less than one year. Any repurchase fee will apply equally to
all classes of shares of a Fund, consistent with section 18 of the Act
and rule 18f-3 thereunder. Further, applicants represent that to the
extent a Fund determines to waive, impose scheduled variations of, or
eliminate any repurchase fee, it will do so consistently with the
requirements of rule 22d-1 under the Act as if the repurchase fee were
a CDSL (defined below) and as if the Fund were an open-end investment
company and the Fund's waiver of, scheduled variation in, or
elimination of, any such repurchase fee will apply uniformly to all
shareholders of the Fund regardless of class.
11. Applicants state that the Initial Funds will adopt a
fundamental policy to repurchase a specified percentage of its shares
(no less than 5% and not more than 25%) at net asset value on a
periodic basis. Such repurchase offers will be conducted pursuant to
rule 23c-3 under the Act.\3\ Each Future Fund will likewise adopt a
fundamental investment policy in compliance with rule 23c-3 and make
periodic repurchase offers to its shareholders, or provide periodic
liquidity with respect to its shares pursuant to rule 13e-4 under the
Exchange Act. Any repurchase offers made by the Funds will be made to
all holders of shares of each such Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Applicants submit that rule 23c-3 and Regulation M under the
Exchange Act permit an interval fund to make repurchase offers to
repurchase its shares while engaging in a continuous offering of its
shares pursuant to rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Applicants represent that any asset-based service and/or
distribution fees for each class of shares will comply with the
provisions of FINRA Rule 2341 (``Sales Charge Rule'').\4\ Applicants
also represent that each Fund will disclose in its prospectus the fees,
expenses, and other characteristics of each class of shares offered for
sale by the prospectus, as is required for open-end multiple class
funds under Form N-1A. As is required for open-end funds, each Fund
will disclose its expenses in shareholder reports, and describe any
arrangements that result in breakpoints in or elimination of sales
loads in its prospectus.\5\ In addition, applicants will comply with
applicable enhanced fee disclosure requirements for fund of funds,
including registered funds of hedge funds.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Any reference to the Sales Charge Rule includes any
successor or replacement rule that may be adopted by the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'').
\5\ See Shareholder Reports and Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
of Registered Management Investment Companies, Investment Company
Act Release No. 26372 (Feb. 27, 2004) (adopting release) (requiring
open-end investment companies to disclose fund expenses in
shareholder reports); and Disclosure of Breakpoint Discounts by
Mutual Funds, Investment Company Act Release No. 26464 (June 7,
2004) (adopting release) (requiring open-end investment companies to
provide prospectus disclosure of certain sales load information).
\6\ Fund of Funds Investments, Investment Company Act Rel. Nos.
26198 (Oct. 1, 2003) (proposing release) and 27399 (Jun. 20, 2006)
(adopting release). See also Rules 12d1-1, et seq. of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Each of the Funds will comply with any requirements that the
[[Page 2467]]
Commission or FINRA may adopt regarding disclosure at the point of sale
and in transaction confirmations about the costs and conflicts of
interest arising out of the distribution of open-end investment company
shares, and regarding prospectus disclosure of sales loads and revenue
sharing arrangements, as if those requirements applied to each Fund. In
addition, each Fund will contractually require that any distributor of
the Fund's shares comply with such requirements in connection with the
distribution of such Fund's shares.
14. Applicants state that each Fund may impose an EWC on shares
submitted for repurchase that have been held less than a specified
period and may waive the EWC for certain categories of shareholders or
transactions to be established from time to time. Applicants state that
each of the Funds will apply the EWC (and any waivers or scheduled
variations of the EWC) uniformly to all shareholders in a given class
and consistently with the requirements of rule 22d-1 under the Act as
if the Funds were open-end investment companies.
15. Each Fund operating as an interval fund pursuant to rule 23c-3
under the Act may offer its shareholders an exchange feature under
which the shareholders of the Fund may, in connection with the Fund's
periodic repurchase offers, exchange their shares of the Fund for
shares of the same class of (i) registered open-end investment
companies or (ii) other registered closed-end investment companies that
comply with rule 23c-3 under the Act and continuously offer their
shares at net asset value, that are in the Fund's group of investment
companies (collectively, ``Other Funds''). Shares of a Fund operating
pursuant to rule 23c-3 that are exchanged for shares of Other Funds
will be included as part of the amount of the repurchase offer amount
for such Fund as specified in rule 23c-3 under the Act. Any exchange
option will comply with rule 11a-3 under the Act, as if the Fund were
an open-end investment company subject to rule 11a-3. In complying with
rule 11a-3, each Fund will treat an EWC as if it were a contingent
deferred sales load (``CDSL'').
Applicants' Legal Analysis
Multiple Classes of Shares
1. Section 18(a)(2) of the Act makes it unlawful for a closed-end
investment company to issue a senior security that is a stock unless
certain requirements are met. Applicants state that the creation of
multiple classes of shares of the Funds may violate section 18(a)(2)
because the Funds may not meet such requirements with respect to a
class of shares that may be a senior security.
2. Section 18(c) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that a
registered closed-end investment company may not issue or sell any
senior security if, immediately thereafter, the company has outstanding
more than one class of senior security. Applicants state that the
creation of multiple classes of Shares of a Fund proposed herein may
result in Shares of a class having ``priority over [another] class as
to . . . payment of dividends,'' and being deemed a ``senior
security,'' because shareholders of different classes may pay different
distribution fees, different shareholder services fees, and any other
expense. Accordingly, applicants state that the creation of multiple
classes of Shares of a Fund with different fees and expenses may be
prohibited by section 18(c).
3. Section 18(i) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that each
share of stock issued by a registered management investment company
will be a voting stock and have equal voting rights with every other
outstanding voting stock. Applicants state that multiple classes of
shares of the Funds may violate section 18(i) of the Act because each
class would be entitled to exclusive voting rights with respect to
matters solely related to that class.
4. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person, security or transaction or any class or classes of persons,
securities or transactions from any provision of the Act, or from any
rule or regulation under the Act, if and to the extent such exemption
is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with
the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Act. Applicants request an exemption under
section 6(c) from sections 18(a)(2), 18(c) and 18(i) to permit the
Funds to issue multiple classes of shares.
5. Applicants submit that the proposed allocation of expenses
relating to distribution and voting rights among multiple classes is
equitable and will not discriminate against any group or class of
shareholders. Applicants submit that the proposed arrangements would
permit a Fund to facilitate the distribution of its securities and
provide investors with a broader choice of shareholder services.
Applicants assert that the proposed closed-end investment company
multiple class structure does not raise the concerns underlying section
18 of the Act to any greater degree than open-end investment companies'
multiple class structures that are permitted by rule 18f-3 under the
Act. Applicants state that each Fund will comply with the provisions of
rule 18f-3 as if it were an open-end investment company.
Early Withdrawal Charges
1. Section 23(c) of the Act provides, in relevant part, that no
registered closed-end investment company shall purchase securities of
which it is the issuer, except: (a) On a securities exchange or other
open market; (b) pursuant to tenders, after reasonable opportunity to
submit tenders given to all holders of securities of the class to be
purchased; or (c) under other circumstances as the Commission may
permit by rules and regulations or orders for the protection of
investors.
2. Rule 23c-3 under the Act permits an interval fund to make
repurchase offers of between five and twenty-five percent of its
outstanding shares at net asset value at periodic intervals pursuant to
a fundamental policy of the interval fund. Rule 23c-3(b)(1) under the
Act permits an interval fund to deduct from repurchase proceeds only a
repurchase fee, not to exceed two percent of the proceeds, that is paid
to the interval fund and is reasonably intended to compensate the fund
for expenses directly related to the repurchase.
3. Section 23(c)(3) provides that the Commission may issue an order
that would permit a closed-end investment company to repurchase its
shares in circumstances in which the repurchase is made in a manner or
on a basis that does not unfairly discriminate against any holders of
the class or classes of securities to be purchased.
4. Applicants request relief under section 6(c), discussed above,
and section 23(c)(3) from rule 23c-3 to the extent necessary for the
Funds to impose EWCs on shares of the Funds submitted for repurchase
that have been held for less than a specified period.
5. Applicants state that the EWCs they intend to impose are
functionally similar to CDSLs imposed by open-end investment companies
under rule 6c-10 under the Act. Rule 6c-10 permits open-end investment
companies to impose CDSLs, subject to certain conditions. Applicants
note that rule 6c-10 is grounded in policy considerations supporting
the employment of CDSLs where there are adequate safeguards for the
investor and state that the same policy considerations support
imposition of EWCs in the interval fund context. In addition,
applicants state that EWCs may be necessary for the distributor to
recover distribution costs. Applicants represent that any EWC
[[Page 2468]]
imposed by the Funds will comply with rule 6c-10 under the Act as if
the rule were applicable to closed-end investment companies. The Funds
will disclose EWCs in accordance with the requirements of Form N-1A
concerning CDSLs.
Asset-Based Service and Distribution Fees
1. Section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d-1 under the Act prohibit
an affiliated person of a registered investment company, or an
affiliated person of such person, acting as principal, from
participating in or effecting any transaction in connection with any
joint enterprise or joint arrangement in which the investment company
participates unless the Commission issues an order permitting the
transaction. In reviewing applications submitted under section 17(d)
and rule 17d-1, the Commission considers whether the participation of
the investment company in a joint enterprise or joint arrangement is
consistent with the provisions, policies and purposes of the Act, and
the extent to which the participation is on a basis different from or
less advantageous than that of other participants.
2. Rule 17d-3 under the Act provides an exemption from section
17(d) and rule 17d-1 to permit open-end investment companies to enter
into distribution arrangements pursuant to rule 12b-1 under the Act.
Applicants request an order under section 17(d) and rule 17d-1 under
the Act to the extent necessary to permit the Funds to impose asset-
based service and distribution fees. Applicants have agreed to comply
with rules 12b-1 and 17d-3 as if those rules applied to closed-end
investment companies, which they believe will resolve any concerns that
might arise in connection with a Fund financing the distribution of its
shares through asset-based service and distribution fees.
3. For the reasons stated above, applicants submit that the
exemptions requested under section 6(c) are necessary and appropriate
in the public interest and are consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions
of the Act. Applicants further submit that the relief requested
pursuant to section 23(c)(3) will be consistent with the protection of
investors and will insure that applicants do not unfairly discriminate
against any holders of the class of securities to be purchased.
Finally, applicants state that the Funds' imposition of asset-based
service and distribution fees is consistent with the provisions,
policies, and purposes of the Act and does not involve participation on
a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other
participants.
Applicants' Condition
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following condition:
Each Fund relying on the order will comply with the provisions of
rules 6c-10, 12b-1, 17d-3, 18f-3, 22d-1, and, where applicable, 11a-3
under the Act, as amended from time to time, as if those rules applied
to closed-end management investment companies, and will comply with the
Sales Charge Rule, as amended from time to time, as if that rule
applied to all closed-end management investment companies.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-00451 Filed 1-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P