Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 315, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program, To Reflect the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's Adoption of a Final Rule on Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions, 535-538 [2019-28448]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2020 / Notices
Written statements may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Statements
• Use the Commission’s internet
submission form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml); or
• Send an email message to rulescomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. 265–28 on the subject line; or
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Paper Statements
• Send paper statements to Vanessa
A. Countryman, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
265–28. This file number should be
included on the subject line if email is
used. To help us process and review
your statement more efficiently, please
use only one method.
Statements also will be available for
website viewing and printing in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
100 F Street NE, Room 1503,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. All statements received
will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc Oorloff Sharma, Chief Counsel,
Office of the Investor Advocate, at (202)
551–3302, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting will be open to the public via
telephone. Persons needing special
accommodations to take part because of
a disability should notify the contact
person listed in the section above
entitled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The agenda for the meeting includes:
Welcome remarks; a discussion of the
SEC’s proxy voting advice and Rule
14a–8 proposed rulemakings (which
may include a recommendation from
the Investor as Owner Subcommittee);
and a discussion of exchange rebate tier
disclosure (which may include a
recommendation of the Market
Structure Subcommittee).
Dated: December 31, 2019.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–28499 Filed 1–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jan 03, 2020
Jkt 250001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87871; File No. SR–MIAX–
2019–52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rule 315,
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
Program, To Reflect the Financial
Crimes Enforcement Network’s
Adoption of a Final Rule on Customer
Due Diligence Requirements for
Financial Institutions
December 30, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
20, 2019, Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX Options’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’), the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange, to reflect the
Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network’s (‘‘FinCEN’’) adoption of a
final rule on Customer Due Diligence
Requirements for Financial Institutions
(‘‘CDD Rule’’). Specifically, the
proposed amendments would conform
MIAX Rule 315 to the CDD Rule’s
amendments to the minimum regulatory
requirements for Members’ 5 anti-money
laundering (‘‘AML’’) compliance
programs by requiring such programs to
include risk-based procedures for
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or
organization approved to exercise the trading rights
associated with a Trading Permit. Members are
deemed ‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
535
conducting ongoing customer due
diligence. This ongoing customer due
diligence element for AML programs
includes: (1) Understanding the nature
and purpose of customer relationships
for the purpose of developing a
customer risk profile; and (2)
conducting ongoing monitoring to
identify and report suspicious
transactions and, on a risk basis, to
maintain and update customer
information. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as ‘‘noncontroversial’’ under paragraph (f)(6) of
Rule 19b–4 under the Act,6 and
provided the Commission with the
notice required by Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
under the Act.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/ at MIAX Options’ principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
I. Background
The Bank Secrecy Act 7 (‘‘BSA’’),
among other things, requires financial
institutions,8 including broker-dealers,
to develop and implement AML
programs that, at a minimum, meet the
statutorily enumerated ‘‘four pillars.’’ 9
These four pillars currently require
broker-dealers to have written AML
programs that include, at a minimum:
• The establishment and
implementation of policies, procedures
and internal controls reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with
the applicable provisions of the BSA
and implementing regulations;
6 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
U.S.C. 5311, et seq.
8 See U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) (defining ‘‘financial
institution’’).
9 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)(1).
7 31
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
536
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2020 / Notices
• independent testing for compliance
by broker-dealer personnel or a
qualified outside party;
• designation of an individual or
individuals responsible for
implementing and monitoring the
operations and internal controls of the
AML program; and
• ongoing training for appropriate
persons.10
In addition to meeting the BSA’s
requirements with respect to AML
programs, Exchange Members 11 must
also comply with Exchange Rule 315,
which incorporates the BSA’s four
pillars, as well as requires Members’
AML programs to establish and
implement policies and procedures that
can be reasonably expected to detect
and cause the reporting of suspicious
transactions.
On May 11, 2016, FinCEN, the bureau
of the Department of the Treasury
responsible for administering the BSA
and its implementing regulations,
issued the CDD Rule 12 to clarify and
strengthen customer due diligence for
covered financial institutions,13
including broker-dealers. In its CDD
Rule, FinCEN identifies four
components of customer due diligence:
(1) Customer identification and
verification; (2) beneficial ownership
identification and verification; (3)
understanding the nature and purpose
of customer relationships; and (4)
ongoing monitoring for reporting
suspicious transactions and, on a risk
basis, maintaining and updating
customer information.14 As the first
component is already required to be part
of a broker-dealers AML program under
the BSA, the CDD Rule focuses on the
other three components.
Specifically, the CDD Rule focuses
particularly on the second component
by adding a new requirement that
covered financial institutions identify
and verify the identity of the beneficial
owners of all legal entity customers at
the time a new account is opened,
10 31
CFR 1023.210(b).
Exchange Rule 100.
12 FinCEN Customer Due Diligence Requirements
for Financial Institutions; CDD Rule, 81 FR 29397
(May 11, 2016) (CDD Rule Release); 82 FR 45182
(September 28, 2017) (making technical correcting
amendments to the final CDD Rule published on
May 11, 2016). FinCEN is authorized to impose
AML program requirements on financial
institutions and to require financial institutions to
maintain procedures to ensure compliance with the
BSA and associated regulations. 31 U.S.C.
5318(h)(2) and (a)(2). The CDD Rule is the result of
the rulemaking process FinCEN initiated in March
2012. See 77 FR 13046 (March 5, 2012) (Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking) and 79 FR 45151
(Aug. 4, 2014) (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking).
13 See 31 CFR 1010.230(f) (defining ‘‘covered
financial institution’’).
14 See CDD Rule Release at 29398.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
11 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jan 03, 2020
Jkt 250001
subject to certain exclusions and
exemptions.15 The CDD Rule also
addresses the third and fourth
components, which FinCEN states ‘‘are
already implicitly required for covered
financial institutions to comply with
their suspicious activity reporting
requirements,’’ by amending the
existing AML program rules for covered
financial institutions to explicitly
require these components to be
included in AML programs as a new
‘‘fifth pillar.’’
On November 21, 2017, FINRA
published Regulatory Notice 17–40 to
provide guidance to member firms
regarding their obligations under FINRA
Rule 3310 in light of the adoption of
FinCEN’s CDD Rule. In addition, the
Notice summarized the CDD Rule’s
impact on member firms, including the
addition of the new fifth pillar required
for member firms’ AML programs.
FINRA also amended FINRA Rule 3310
to explicitly incorporate the fifth
pillar.16 This proposed rule change
amends MIAX Rule 315 to harmonize it
with the FINRA rule and incorporate the
fifth pillar.
II. Exchange Rule 315 and Amendment
to Minimum Requirements for
Members’ AML Programs
Section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act
of 2001 17 amended the BSA to require
broker-dealers to develop and
implement AML programs that include
the four pillars mentioned above.
Consistent with Section 352 of the
PATRIOT Act, and incorporating the
four pillars, MIAX Rule 315 requires
each Member to develop and implement
a written AML program reasonably
designed to achieve and monitor the
Member’s compliance with the BSA and
implementing regulations. Among other
requirements, MIAX Rule 315 requires
that each Member firm, at a minimum:
(1) Establish and implement policies
and procedures that can be reasonably
expected to detect and cause the
reporting of suspicious transactions; (2)
establish and implement policies,
procedures, and internal controls
reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the BSA and
implementing regulations; (3) provide
independent testing for compliance to
be conducted by Member personnel or
15 See 31 CFR 1010.230(d) (defining ‘‘beneficial
owner’’) and 31 CFR 1010.230(e) (defining ‘‘legal
entity customer’’).
16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83154
(May 2, 2018), 83 FR 20906 (May 8, 2018) (File No.
SR–FINRA–2018–016).
17 Uniting and Strengthening America by
Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107–
56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a qualified outside party; (4) designate
and identify to MIAX an individual or
individuals (i.e., AML compliance
person(s)) who will be responsible for
implementing and monitoring the dayto-day operations and internal controls
of the AML program and provide
prompt notification to the Exchange of
any changes to the designation; and (5)
provide ongoing training for appropriate
persons.
FinCEN’s CDD Rule does not change
the requirements of Exchange Rule 315,
and Members must continue to comply
with its requirements.18 However,
FinCEN’s CDD Rule amends the
minimum regulatory requirements for
broker-dealers’ AML programs by
explicitly requiring such programs to
include risk-based procedures for
conducting ongoing customer due
diligence.19 Accordingly, the Exchange
is proposing to amend Exchange Rule
315 to incorporate this ongoing
customer due diligence element, or
‘‘fifth pillar’’ required for AML
programs. Thus, proposed Rule 315(f)
would provide that the AML programs
required by this Rule shall, at a
minimum include appropriate riskbased procedures for conducting
ongoing customer due diligence, to
include, but not be limited to: (1)
Understanding the nature and purpose
of customer relationships for the
purpose of developing a customer risk
profile; and (2) conducting ongoing
monitoring to identify and report
suspicious transactions and, on a risk
basis, to maintain and update customer
information.
As stated in the CDD Rule, these
provisions are not new and merely
codify existing expectations for
Members to adequately identify and
report suspicious transactions as
required under the BSA and encapsulate
practices generally already undertaken
by securities firms to know and
understand their customers.20 The
proposed rule change simply
incorporates into Exchange Rule 315 the
ongoing customer due diligence
element, or ‘‘fifth pillar,’’ required for
AML programs by the CDD Rule to aid
Members in complying with the CDD
Rule’s requirements. However, to the
extent that these elements, which are
briefly summarized below, are not
already included in Members’ AML
18 FinCEN notes that broker-dealers must
continue to comply with FINRA Rules,
notwithstanding differences between the CDD Rule
and FINRA Rule 3310, which is substantially
identical to Exchange Rule 315. See CDD Rule
Release 29421, n. 85.
19 See CDD Rule Release at 29420; 31 CFR
1023.210.
20 Id. at 29419.
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2020 / Notices
programs, the CDD Rule requires
Members to update their AML programs
to explicitly incorporate them.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
III. Summary of Fifth Pillar’s
Requirements
Understanding the Nature and Purpose
of Customer Relationships
FinCEN states in the CDD Rule that
firms must necessarily have an
understanding of the nature and
purpose of the customer relationship in
order to determine whether a
transaction is potentially suspicious
and, in turn, to fulfill their SAR
obligations.21 To that end, the CDD Rule
requires that firms understand the
nature and purpose of the customer
relationship in order to develop a
customer risk profile. The customer risk
profile refers to information gathered
about a customer to form the baseline
against which customer activity is
assessed for suspicious transaction
reporting.22 Information relevant to
understanding the nature and purpose
of the customer relationship may be
self-evident and, depending on the facts
and circumstances, may include such
information as the type of customer,
account or service offered, and the
customer’s income, net worth, domicile,
or principal occupation or business, as
well as, in the case of existing
customers, the customer’s history of
activity.23 The CDD Rule also does not
prescribe a particular form of the
customer risk profile.24 Instead, the CDD
Rule states that depending on the firm
and the nature of its business, a
customer risk profile may consist of
individualized risk scoring, placement
of customers into risk categories or
another means of assessing customer
risk that allows firms to understand the
risk posed by the customer and to
demonstrate that understanding.25
The CDD Rule also addresses the
interplay of understanding the nature
and purpose of customer relationships
with the ongoing monitoring obligation
discussed below. The CDD Rule
explains that firms are not necessarily
required or expected to integrate
customer information or the customer
risk profile into existing transaction
monitoring systems (for example, to
serve as the baseline for identifying and
assessing suspicious transactions on a
contemporaneous basis).26 Rather,
FinCEN expects firms to use the
customer information and customer risk
21 Id.
22 Id.
at 29421.
at 29422.
23 Id.
24 Id.
25 Id.
26 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jan 03, 2020
Jkt 250001
profile as appropriate during the course
of complying with their obligations
under the BSA in order to determine
whether a particular flagged transaction
is suspicious.27
Conduct Ongoing Monitoring
As with the requirement to
understand the nature and purpose of
the customer relationship, the
requirement to conduct ongoing
monitoring to identify and report
suspicious transactions and, on a risk
basis, to maintain and update customer
information, merely adopts existing
supervisory and regulatory expectations
as explicit minimum standards of
customer due diligence required for
firms’ AML programs.28 If, in the course
of its normal monitoring for suspicious
activity, the Member detects
information that is relevant to assessing
the customer’s risk profile, the Member
must update the customer information,
including the information regarding the
beneficial owners of legal entity
customers.29 However, there is no
expectation that the Member update
customer information, including
beneficial ownership information, on an
ongoing or continuous basis.30
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.31 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 32 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest because it will aid
Members in complying with the CDD
Rule’s requirement that Members’ AML
programs include risk-based procedures
for conducting ongoing customer due
diligence by also incorporating the
requirement into Exchange Rule 315.
27 Id.
at 29402.
29 Id. at 29420–21. See also FINRA Regulatory
Notice 17–40 (discussing identifying and verifying
the identity of beneficial owners of legal entity
customers).
30 Id.
31 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
32 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00045
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change simply
incorporates into Exchange Rule 315 the
ongoing customer due diligence
element, or ‘‘fifth pillar,’’ required for
AML programs by the CDD Rule.
Regardless of the proposed rule change,
to the extent that the elements of the
fifth pillar are not already included in
Members’ AML programs, the CDD Rule
requires Members to update their AML
programs to explicitly incorporate them.
In addition, as stated in the CDD Rule,
these elements are already implicitly
required for covered financial
institutions to comply with their
suspicious activity reporting
requirements. Further, all Exchange
Members that have customers are
required to be members of FINRA
pursuant to Rule 15b9–1 under the
Exchange Act,33 and are therefore
already subject to the requirements of
FINRA Rule 3310. Additionally, the
proposed rule change is virtually
identical 34 to FINRA Rule 3310. The
Exchange is not imposing any
additional direct or indirect burdens on
member firms or their customers
through this proposal, and as such, the
proposal imposes no new burdens on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 35 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 36
thereunder.
33 17
28 Id.
PO 00000
537
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CFR 240.15b9–1.
Exchange notes that changes between the
proposed Rule and FINRA Rule 3310 are nonsubstantive and relate to cross references.
35 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
36 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
34 The
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
Continued
06JAN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
538
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 3 / Monday, January 6, 2020 / Notices
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2019–52 and should
be submittedon or before January 27,
2020.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.37
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2019–52 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2019–52. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
December 31, 2019.
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jan 03, 2020
Jkt 250001
[FR Doc. 2019–28448 Filed 1–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Investment Company Act Release No.
33739; 812–15040]
Fundrise Real Estate Interval Fund,
LLC, et al.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of application for an order
(‘‘Order’’) under section 17(d) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the Act to
permit certain joint transactions
otherwise prohibited by section 17(d) of
the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549–
1090. Applicants: 11 Dupont Circle NW,
9th Floor, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce R. MacNeil, Senior Counsel, at
202–551–6817, or Kaitlin C. Bottock,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551–6825
(Division of Investment Management,
Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order to permit certain
closed-end management investment
companies to co-invest in portfolio
companies with each other and with
affiliated investment funds and
accounts.
APPLICANTS: Fundrise Real Estate
Interval Fund, LLC (the ‘‘Company’’),
Fundrise Real Estate Investment Trust,
LLC, Fundrise Equity REIT, LLC,
Fundrise Income eREIT II, LLC,
37 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Fundrise Income eREIT III, LLC,
Fundrise Income eREIT 2019, LLC,
Fundrise Growth eREIT II, LLC,
Fundrise Growth eREIT III, LLC,
Fundrise Growth eREIT 2019, LLC,
Fundrise Midland Opportunistic REIT,
LLC, Fundrise West Coast Opportunistic
REIT, LLC, Fundrise East Coast
Opportunistic REIT, LLC, Fundrise ForSale Housing eFUND—Los Angeles CA,
LLC, Fundrise For-Sale Housing
eFUND—Washington DC, LLC, Fundrise
National For-Sale Housing eFund, LLC,
Fundrise Opportunity Fund, LP, (the
‘‘Existing Affiliated Funds’’), Fundrise
Advisors, LLC (‘‘FA’’) and Fundrise
Lending LLC.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on June 11, 2019, and amended on
September 4, 2019, and November 26,
2019.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on January 24, 2020, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of
service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file
number, or for an applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
Introduction
1. The applicants request an order of
the Commission under section 17(d) of
the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act to
permit, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the application
(the ‘‘Conditions’’), one or more
Regulated Funds 1 and/or one or more
1 ‘‘Regulated Funds’’ means the Company and the
Future Regulated Funds. ‘‘Future Regulated Fund’’
means a closed-end management investment
company (a) that is registered under the Act, (b)
whose investment adviser is an Adviser, and (c)
that intends to participate in the proposed coinvestment program (the ‘‘Co-Investment
Program’’).
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 3 (Monday, January 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 535-538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28448]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-87871; File No. SR-MIAX-2019-52]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rule 315, Anti-Money Laundering
Compliance Program, To Reflect the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network's Adoption of a Final Rule on Customer Due Diligence
Requirements for Financial Institutions
December 30, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 20, 2019, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``MIAX Options'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission''), the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange, to
reflect the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's (``FinCEN'')
adoption of a final rule on Customer Due Diligence Requirements for
Financial Institutions (``CDD Rule''). Specifically, the proposed
amendments would conform MIAX Rule 315 to the CDD Rule's amendments to
the minimum regulatory requirements for Members' \5\ anti-money
laundering (``AML'') compliance programs by requiring such programs to
include risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due
diligence. This ongoing customer due diligence element for AML programs
includes: (1) Understanding the nature and purpose of customer
relationships for the purpose of developing a customer risk profile;
and (2) conducting ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious
transactions and, on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer
information. The Exchange has designated this proposal as ``non-
controversial'' under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 under the Act,\6\
and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
\6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/ at MIAX Options'
principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
I. Background
The Bank Secrecy Act \7\ (``BSA''), among other things, requires
financial institutions,\8\ including broker-dealers, to develop and
implement AML programs that, at a minimum, meet the statutorily
enumerated ``four pillars.'' \9\ These four pillars currently require
broker-dealers to have written AML programs that include, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 31 U.S.C. 5311, et seq.
\8\ See U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) (defining ``financial institution'').
\9\ 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The establishment and implementation of policies,
procedures and internal controls reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the applicable provisions of the BSA and implementing
regulations;
[[Page 536]]
independent testing for compliance by broker-dealer
personnel or a qualified outside party;
designation of an individual or individuals responsible
for implementing and monitoring the operations and internal controls of
the AML program; and
ongoing training for appropriate persons.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 31 CFR 1023.210(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to meeting the BSA's requirements with respect to AML
programs, Exchange Members \11\ must also comply with Exchange Rule
315, which incorporates the BSA's four pillars, as well as requires
Members' AML programs to establish and implement policies and
procedures that can be reasonably expected to detect and cause the
reporting of suspicious transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 11, 2016, FinCEN, the bureau of the Department of the
Treasury responsible for administering the BSA and its implementing
regulations, issued the CDD Rule \12\ to clarify and strengthen
customer due diligence for covered financial institutions,\13\
including broker-dealers. In its CDD Rule, FinCEN identifies four
components of customer due diligence: (1) Customer identification and
verification; (2) beneficial ownership identification and verification;
(3) understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships; and
(4) ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a
risk basis, maintaining and updating customer information.\14\ As the
first component is already required to be part of a broker-dealers AML
program under the BSA, the CDD Rule focuses on the other three
components.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ FinCEN Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial
Institutions; CDD Rule, 81 FR 29397 (May 11, 2016) (CDD Rule
Release); 82 FR 45182 (September 28, 2017) (making technical
correcting amendments to the final CDD Rule published on May 11,
2016). FinCEN is authorized to impose AML program requirements on
financial institutions and to require financial institutions to
maintain procedures to ensure compliance with the BSA and associated
regulations. 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)(2) and (a)(2). The CDD Rule is the
result of the rulemaking process FinCEN initiated in March 2012. See
77 FR 13046 (March 5, 2012) (Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking)
and 79 FR 45151 (Aug. 4, 2014) (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking).
\13\ See 31 CFR 1010.230(f) (defining ``covered financial
institution'').
\14\ See CDD Rule Release at 29398.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the CDD Rule focuses particularly on the second
component by adding a new requirement that covered financial
institutions identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners
of all legal entity customers at the time a new account is opened,
subject to certain exclusions and exemptions.\15\ The CDD Rule also
addresses the third and fourth components, which FinCEN states ``are
already implicitly required for covered financial institutions to
comply with their suspicious activity reporting requirements,'' by
amending the existing AML program rules for covered financial
institutions to explicitly require these components to be included in
AML programs as a new ``fifth pillar.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See 31 CFR 1010.230(d) (defining ``beneficial owner'') and
31 CFR 1010.230(e) (defining ``legal entity customer'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 21, 2017, FINRA published Regulatory Notice 17-40 to
provide guidance to member firms regarding their obligations under
FINRA Rule 3310 in light of the adoption of FinCEN's CDD Rule. In
addition, the Notice summarized the CDD Rule's impact on member firms,
including the addition of the new fifth pillar required for member
firms' AML programs. FINRA also amended FINRA Rule 3310 to explicitly
incorporate the fifth pillar.\16\ This proposed rule change amends MIAX
Rule 315 to harmonize it with the FINRA rule and incorporate the fifth
pillar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83154 (May 2,
2018), 83 FR 20906 (May 8, 2018) (File No. SR-FINRA-2018-016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Exchange Rule 315 and Amendment to Minimum Requirements for
Members' AML Programs
Section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 \17\ amended the BSA to
require broker-dealers to develop and implement AML programs that
include the four pillars mentioned above. Consistent with Section 352
of the PATRIOT Act, and incorporating the four pillars, MIAX Rule 315
requires each Member to develop and implement a written AML program
reasonably designed to achieve and monitor the Member's compliance with
the BSA and implementing regulations. Among other requirements, MIAX
Rule 315 requires that each Member firm, at a minimum: (1) Establish
and implement policies and procedures that can be reasonably expected
to detect and cause the reporting of suspicious transactions; (2)
establish and implement policies, procedures, and internal controls
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the BSA and implementing
regulations; (3) provide independent testing for compliance to be
conducted by Member personnel or a qualified outside party; (4)
designate and identify to MIAX an individual or individuals (i.e., AML
compliance person(s)) who will be responsible for implementing and
monitoring the day-to-day operations and internal controls of the AML
program and provide prompt notification to the Exchange of any changes
to the designation; and (5) provide ongoing training for appropriate
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, Pub.
L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FinCEN's CDD Rule does not change the requirements of Exchange Rule
315, and Members must continue to comply with its requirements.\18\
However, FinCEN's CDD Rule amends the minimum regulatory requirements
for broker-dealers' AML programs by explicitly requiring such programs
to include risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due
diligence.\19\ Accordingly, the Exchange is proposing to amend Exchange
Rule 315 to incorporate this ongoing customer due diligence element, or
``fifth pillar'' required for AML programs. Thus, proposed Rule 315(f)
would provide that the AML programs required by this Rule shall, at a
minimum include appropriate risk-based procedures for conducting
ongoing customer due diligence, to include, but not be limited to: (1)
Understanding the nature and purpose of customer relationships for the
purpose of developing a customer risk profile; and (2) conducting
ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and,
on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ FinCEN notes that broker-dealers must continue to comply
with FINRA Rules, notwithstanding differences between the CDD Rule
and FINRA Rule 3310, which is substantially identical to Exchange
Rule 315. See CDD Rule Release 29421, n. 85.
\19\ See CDD Rule Release at 29420; 31 CFR 1023.210.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As stated in the CDD Rule, these provisions are not new and merely
codify existing expectations for Members to adequately identify and
report suspicious transactions as required under the BSA and
encapsulate practices generally already undertaken by securities firms
to know and understand their customers.\20\ The proposed rule change
simply incorporates into Exchange Rule 315 the ongoing customer due
diligence element, or ``fifth pillar,'' required for AML programs by
the CDD Rule to aid Members in complying with the CDD Rule's
requirements. However, to the extent that these elements, which are
briefly summarized below, are not already included in Members' AML
[[Page 537]]
programs, the CDD Rule requires Members to update their AML programs to
explicitly incorporate them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id. at 29419.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Summary of Fifth Pillar's Requirements
Understanding the Nature and Purpose of Customer Relationships
FinCEN states in the CDD Rule that firms must necessarily have an
understanding of the nature and purpose of the customer relationship in
order to determine whether a transaction is potentially suspicious and,
in turn, to fulfill their SAR obligations.\21\ To that end, the CDD
Rule requires that firms understand the nature and purpose of the
customer relationship in order to develop a customer risk profile. The
customer risk profile refers to information gathered about a customer
to form the baseline against which customer activity is assessed for
suspicious transaction reporting.\22\ Information relevant to
understanding the nature and purpose of the customer relationship may
be self-evident and, depending on the facts and circumstances, may
include such information as the type of customer, account or service
offered, and the customer's income, net worth, domicile, or principal
occupation or business, as well as, in the case of existing customers,
the customer's history of activity.\23\ The CDD Rule also does not
prescribe a particular form of the customer risk profile.\24\ Instead,
the CDD Rule states that depending on the firm and the nature of its
business, a customer risk profile may consist of individualized risk
scoring, placement of customers into risk categories or another means
of assessing customer risk that allows firms to understand the risk
posed by the customer and to demonstrate that understanding.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Id. at 29421.
\22\ Id. at 29422.
\23\ Id.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CDD Rule also addresses the interplay of understanding the
nature and purpose of customer relationships with the ongoing
monitoring obligation discussed below. The CDD Rule explains that firms
are not necessarily required or expected to integrate customer
information or the customer risk profile into existing transaction
monitoring systems (for example, to serve as the baseline for
identifying and assessing suspicious transactions on a contemporaneous
basis).\26\ Rather, FinCEN expects firms to use the customer
information and customer risk profile as appropriate during the course
of complying with their obligations under the BSA in order to determine
whether a particular flagged transaction is suspicious.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
\27\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conduct Ongoing Monitoring
As with the requirement to understand the nature and purpose of the
customer relationship, the requirement to conduct ongoing monitoring to
identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to
maintain and update customer information, merely adopts existing
supervisory and regulatory expectations as explicit minimum standards
of customer due diligence required for firms' AML programs.\28\ If, in
the course of its normal monitoring for suspicious activity, the Member
detects information that is relevant to assessing the customer's risk
profile, the Member must update the customer information, including the
information regarding the beneficial owners of legal entity
customers.\29\ However, there is no expectation that the Member update
customer information, including beneficial ownership information, on an
ongoing or continuous basis.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Id. at 29402.
\29\ Id. at 29420-21. See also FINRA Regulatory Notice 17-40
(discussing identifying and verifying the identity of beneficial
owners of legal entity customers).
\30\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\31\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \32\ requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
because it will aid Members in complying with the CDD Rule's
requirement that Members' AML programs include risk-based procedures
for conducting ongoing customer due diligence by also incorporating the
requirement into Exchange Rule 315.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\32\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change simply incorporates into Exchange Rule 315 the ongoing
customer due diligence element, or ``fifth pillar,'' required for AML
programs by the CDD Rule. Regardless of the proposed rule change, to
the extent that the elements of the fifth pillar are not already
included in Members' AML programs, the CDD Rule requires Members to
update their AML programs to explicitly incorporate them. In addition,
as stated in the CDD Rule, these elements are already implicitly
required for covered financial institutions to comply with their
suspicious activity reporting requirements. Further, all Exchange
Members that have customers are required to be members of FINRA
pursuant to Rule 15b9-1 under the Exchange Act,\33\ and are therefore
already subject to the requirements of FINRA Rule 3310. Additionally,
the proposed rule change is virtually identical \34\ to FINRA Rule
3310. The Exchange is not imposing any additional direct or indirect
burdens on member firms or their customers through this proposal, and
as such, the proposal imposes no new burdens on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ 17 CFR 240.15b9-1.
\34\ The Exchange notes that changes between the proposed Rule
and FINRA Rule 3310 are non-substantive and relate to cross
references.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \35\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \36\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\36\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 538]]
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2019-52 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2019-52. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2019-52 and
should be submitted on or before January 27, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\37\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\37\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-28448 Filed 1-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
