Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Circumvention Pursuant to Court Decision, 298-299 [2019-28389]

Download as PDF 298 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2020 / Notices between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to: (1) Approve previous minutes; (2) Summarize status of previously approved and funded projects; (3) Discuss any new projects for which project submission forms have been completed by the deadline of December 27, 2020 and provided in the pre-work package; and (4) Following the public meeting: Vote on projects to move forward for funding approval. The agenda will include time for people to make oral statement of three minutes or less. Individuals wishing to make an oral statement should request in writing by Tuesday, January 7, 2020, to be scheduled on the agenda. Anyone who would like to bring related matters to the attention of the committee may file written statements with the committee staff before or after the meeting. Written comments and requests for time for oral comments must be sent by January 7, 2020 to Robin Hasselquist, RAC Coordinator, 8510 Mendenhall Loop Road, Juneau, Alaska 99801 or by email to robin.hasselquist@usda.gov, or via facsimile 907–586–8808. The agenda will also include time for people to describe new projects that they submitted via a completed project submission form due via email by December 27, 2019 to robin.hasselquist@usda.gov or via facsimile 907–586–8808. To receive a copy of the project submission form please contact Robin Hasselquist. Project statements will be limited to three minutes. Dated: December 27, 2019. Ann Goode, Acting Director, Office of Regulatory and Management Services, USDA Forest Service. [FR Doc. 2019–28351 Filed 1–2–20; 8:45 am] Illinois. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on December 26, 2019. The proposed subzone (22.95 acres) is located at 5100 Lake Terrace Drive, Mt. Vernon. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 31. In accordance with the Board’s regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the Executive Secretary. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The closing period for their receipt is February 12, 2020. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to February 27, 2020. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the ‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz. For further information, contact Elizabeth Whiteman at Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 482–0473. Dated: December 26, 2019. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–28331 Filed 1–2–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–967; C–570–968] BILLING CODE 3411–15–P Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Circumvention Pursuant to Court Decision DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–266–2019] jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Foreign-Trade Zone 31—Granite City, Illinois; Application for Subzone; Walgreen Co.; Mt. Vernon, Illinois An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) by America’s Central Port District, grantee of FTZ 31, requesting subzone status for the facility of Walgreen Co., located in Mt. Vernon, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Jan 02, 2020 Jkt 250001 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 18, 2019, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) issued final judgment in Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 17–00216, Slip Op. 19–164 (CIT AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 December 18, 2019), sustaining the Department of Commerce’s (Commerce) remand results for the anticircumvention determination of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (China). Commerce is notifying the public that the Court has made a final judgment that is not in harmony with Commerce’s final circumvention determination, and that Commerce is amending the final circumvention determination with respect to certain importers. DATES: December 28, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Lui or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0016 or (202) 482–0167, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Final Circumvention Determination on July 26, 2017, finding that certain extruded aluminum products that meet the chemical specifications for 5050-grade aluminum alloy, which are heat-treated, are circumventing the AD and CVD orders 1 on aluminum extrusions from China.2 Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and TAAL America Ltd. (collectively, Tai-Ao) and Regal Ideas Inc. (Regal) filed an action before the Court to challenge Commerce’s Final Circumvention Determination. On June 7, 2019, the Court affirmed Commerce’s determination that heattreated extruded aluminum products from China that meet the chemical specifications for 5050-grade aluminum alloy, regardless of producer, exporter, or importer, are circumventing the Orders under section 781(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) as later-developed merchandise.3 However, the Court found that 1 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011); and Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (collectively, Orders). 2 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Rescission of Minor Alterations Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 82 FR 34630 (July 26, 2017) (Final Circumvention Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 3 See Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Court No. 17–00216, Slip Op. 19– 70 (CIT June 7, 2019) (Remand Order). E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM 03JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 2 / Friday, January 3, 2020 / Notices jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Commerce erred in retroactively applying the determination to the date of the Initiation Notice,4 rather than the date of the Preliminary Determination,5 with respect to Tai-Ao and Regal, and remanded the issue to Commerce ‘‘to reformulate its liquidation instructions consistent with this opinion {.}’’ 6 Commerce issued its Results of Redetermination on July 22, 2019, in which it stated its intent to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that entries of extruded aluminum products that meet the chemical specifications for 5050 grade aluminum alloy and are heat-treated, are outside the scope of the Orders if they: (1) Were the subject of Commerce’s Final Circumvention Determination; (2) were exported from China by Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and/or imported into the United States by TAAL America Ltd.; (3) were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period March 21, 2016 through November 13, 2016; and (4) remain unliquidated as of September 15, 2017.7 Commerce included draft instructions to CBP related to Tai-Ao in its Results of Redetermination and stated its intent to issue those instructions: (1) Should the Court issue a final decision in which it affirms Commerce’s final remand redetermination; and (2) after Commerce has issued its ‘‘Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Circumvention and Notice of Amended Final Determination of Circumvention Pursuant to Court Decision.’’ 8 With respect to Regal, Commerce stated in its Results of Redetermination that there are no applicable entries which have been imported by Regal during the period March 21, 2016 through November 13, 2016. Accordingly, Commerce did not prepare instructions with respect to Regal.9 On December 18, 2019, the Court sustained Commerce’s Results of 4 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 81 FR 15039 (March 21, 2016) (Initiation Notice). 5 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Intent To Rescind Minor Alterations AntiCircumvention Inquiry, 81 FR 79444 (November 14, 2016) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 6 See Remand Order. 7 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Court No. 17–00216, Slip Op. 19–70 (CIT June 7, 2019), dated July 22, 2019 (Results of Redetermination). 8 Id. 9 Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Jan 02, 2020 Jkt 250001 Redetermination, and entered final judgment.10 Timken Notice Amended Final Determination of Circumvention Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. In the event the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct CBP that entries of extruded aluminum products that meet the chemical specifications for 5050 grade aluminum alloy and are heat-treated, are outside the scope of the Orders if they: (1) Were the subject of Commerce’s Final Circumvention Determination; (2) were exported from China by Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and/or imported into the United States by TAAL America Ltd.; (3) were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period March 21, 2016 through November 13, 2016; and (4) remain unliquidated as of September 15, 2017. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516(A)(e), 781(d), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 27, 2019. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2019–28389 Filed 1–2–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 10 See Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Court No. 17–00216, Slip Op. 19– 164 (CIT Dec. 18, 2019). 11 See Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 12 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades). Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–809] In its decision in Timken,11 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,12 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The Court’s December 18, 2019 judgment sustaining Commerce’s Results of Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with Commerce’s Final Circumvention Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirement of Timken. PO 00000 299 Sfmt 4703 Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled CarbonQuality Steel Products From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) continues to find that Novolipetsk Steel (NLMK), Severstal PAO, and Severstal Export GmbH made no shipments of certain hot-rolled flatrolled carbon-quality steel products (hot-rolled steel) from the Russian Federation during the period of review (POR) of December 1, 2017 through November 30, 2018. DATES: Applicable January 3, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston N. Cox, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On October 7, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results, but we received no comments. Accordingly, we made no changes to the Preliminary Results. Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order For the purposes of this order, ‘‘hotrolled steel’’ means certain hot-rolled flat-rolled carbon-quality steel products of a rectangular shape, of a width of 0.5 inch or greater, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal and whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances, in coils (whether or not in successively superimposed layers) regardless of thickness, and in straight lengths, of a thickness less than 4.75 mm and of a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness. Universal mill plate (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled CarbonQuality Steel Products from the Russian Federation: Preliminary No Shipments Determination of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 2018, 84 FR 53408 (October 7, 2019) (Preliminary Results). E:\FR\FM\03JAN1.SGM 03JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 298-299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-967; C-570-968]


Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Notice 
of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination and Notice of 
Amended Final Determination of Circumvention Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 18, 2019, the United States Court of International 
Trade (the Court) issued final judgment in Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) 
Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 17-00216, Slip Op. 
19-164 (CIT December 18, 2019), sustaining the Department of Commerce's 
(Commerce) remand results for the anti-circumvention determination of 
the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on 
aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China (China). 
Commerce is notifying the public that the Court has made a final 
judgment that is not in harmony with Commerce's final circumvention 
determination, and that Commerce is amending the final circumvention 
determination with respect to certain importers.

DATES: December 28, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Lui or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0016 or (202) 482-0167, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    Commerce published the Final Circumvention Determination on July 
26, 2017, finding that certain extruded aluminum products that meet the 
chemical specifications for 5050-grade aluminum alloy, which are heat-
treated, are circumventing the AD and CVD orders \1\ on aluminum 
extrusions from China.\2\ Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and TAAL 
America Ltd. (collectively, Tai-Ao) and Regal Ideas Inc. (Regal) filed 
an action before the Court to challenge Commerce's Final Circumvention 
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011); and Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 
Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (collectively, Orders).
    \2\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Orders and Rescission of Minor Alterations 
Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 82 FR 34630 (July 26, 2017) (Final 
Circumvention Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 7, 2019, the Court affirmed Commerce's determination that 
heat-treated extruded aluminum products from China that meet the 
chemical specifications for 5050-grade aluminum alloy, regardless of 
producer, exporter, or importer, are circumventing the Orders under 
section 781(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) as 
later-developed merchandise.\3\ However, the Court found that

[[Page 299]]

Commerce erred in retroactively applying the determination to the date 
of the Initiation Notice,\4\ rather than the date of the Preliminary 
Determination,\5\ with respect to Tai-Ao and Regal, and remanded the 
issue to Commerce ``to reformulate its liquidation instructions 
consistent with this opinion {.{time} '' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00216, Slip Op. 19-70 (CIT June 7, 2019) 
(Remand Order).
    \4\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Initiation of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry, 81 FR 15039 (March 21, 
2016) (Initiation Notice).
    \5\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Circumvention of the 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Intent To Rescind 
Minor Alterations Anti- Circumvention Inquiry, 81 FR 79444 (November 
14, 2016) (Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.
    \6\ See Remand Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce issued its Results of Redetermination on July 22, 2019, in 
which it stated its intent to instruct U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) that entries of extruded aluminum products that meet 
the chemical specifications for 5050 grade aluminum alloy and are heat-
treated, are outside the scope of the Orders if they: (1) Were the 
subject of Commerce's Final Circumvention Determination; (2) were 
exported from China by Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and/or 
imported into the United States by TAAL America Ltd.; (3) were entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period March 
21, 2016 through November 13, 2016; and (4) remain unliquidated as of 
September 15, 2017.\7\ Commerce included draft instructions to CBP 
related to Tai-Ao in its Results of Redetermination and stated its 
intent to issue those instructions: (1) Should the Court issue a final 
decision in which it affirms Commerce's final remand redetermination; 
and (2) after Commerce has issued its ``Notice of Court Decision Not in 
Harmony With Final Determination of Circumvention and Notice of Amended 
Final Determination of Circumvention Pursuant to Court Decision.'' \8\ 
With respect to Regal, Commerce stated in its Results of 
Redetermination that there are no applicable entries which have been 
imported by Regal during the period March 21, 2016 through November 13, 
2016. Accordingly, Commerce did not prepare instructions with respect 
to Regal.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United States, 
Court No. 17-00216, Slip Op. 19-70 (CIT June 7, 2019), dated July 
22, 2019 (Results of Redetermination).
    \8\ Id.
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 18, 2019, the Court sustained Commerce's Results of 
Redetermination, and entered final judgment.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. et al. v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00216, Slip Op. 19-164 (CIT Dec. 18, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\11\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\12\ the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Act, 
Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ``in 
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of 
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's December 
18, 2019 judgment sustaining Commerce's Results of Redetermination 
constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with 
Commerce's Final Circumvention Determination. This notice is published 
in fulfillment of the publication requirement of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Timken Co., v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. 
Cir. 1990) (Timken).
    \12\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Determination of Circumvention

    Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject 
merchandise pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if 
appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. In the event 
the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, 
Commerce will instruct CBP that entries of extruded aluminum products 
that meet the chemical specifications for 5050 grade aluminum alloy and 
are heat-treated, are outside the scope of the Orders if they: (1) Were 
the subject of Commerce's Final Circumvention Determination; (2) were 
exported from China by Tai-Ao Aluminum (Taishan) Co., Ltd. and/or 
imported into the United States by TAAL America Ltd.; (3) were entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period March 
21, 2016 through November 13, 2016; and (4) remain unliquidated as of 
September 15, 2017.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516(A)(e), 781(d), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 27, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-28389 Filed 1-2-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.