Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Allow the Exchange To Continue To List Classes of Options on the MSCI Emerging Markets Index After January 1, 2020, 72409-72414 [2019-28215]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
investors affected by, the Rule. For the
reasons stated above, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Partial
Amendments Nos. 1 and 2
The Commission finds good cause,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
for approving the proposed rule change,
as modified by Partial Amendment Nos.
1 and 2 thereto, prior to the 30th day
after publication of Partial Amendment
No. 2 in the Federal Register. Partial
Amendment No. 2 responds specifically
to comments received in response to the
Order Instituting Proceedings and
makes corresponding amendments to
the proposal. These revisions
specifically respond to comments
received, add clarity to the proposal,
and do not raise any novel regulatory
concerns. Accordingly, the Commission
finds that good cause exists to approve
the proposal, as modified by Partial
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 on an
accelerated basis.
VI. Solicitation of Comments on Partial
Amendment No. 2
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended by Partial
Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, is consistent
with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2019–012 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2019–012. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2019–012 and should be submitted on
or before January 21, 2020.
VII. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered pursuant to
Exchange Act Section 19(b)(2) 53 that the
proposal (SR–FINRA–2019–012), as
modified by Partial Amendments Nos. 1
and 2, be, and it hereby is, approved on
an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.230
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–28216 Filed 12–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87852; File No. SR–CBOE–
2019–122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change To Allow
the Exchange To Continue To List
Classes of Options on the MSCI
Emerging Markets Index After January
1, 2020
December 23, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on December 12, 2019, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
72409
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons and, for
the reasons discussed below, is issuing
this order approving the proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. seeks approval
from the Securities and Exchange
Commission to continue listing classes
of options on the MSCI EM Index.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to seek
approval pursuant to Rule 4.10(i) for the
continued listing of options on the EM
Index (‘‘EM Options’’). Rule 4.10(i)
establishes maintenance listing
standards that apply to options on the
EM Index 3 and also provides that in the
event a class of index options listed on
the Exchange fails to satisfy the
maintenance listing standards, the
Exchange shall not open for trading any
additional series of options of that class
unless the continued listing of that class
of index options has been approved by
the Commission under Section 19(b)(2)
of the Exchange Act. Specifically, Rule
4.10(i)(2), requires that the total number
of component securities in the EM Index
230 17
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3 As well as the MSCI EAFE, FTSE Emerging and
FTSE Developed Europe indexes.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
72410
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
may not increase or decrease by more
than 10% over the last six-month period
(the ‘‘component securities threshold’’).
Due to global market trends and the
overall objectives of the EM Index, as
described below, the Exchange has
become aware that the EM Index will
not meet this requirement for the next
bi-annual index surveillance review of
the EM Index components as-of January
1, 2020. Thus, the Exchange now seeks
the Commission’s approval for the
continued listing of options on the EM
Index, specifically, in connection with
the component securities threshold,
beginning January 1, 2020, as provided
in Rule 4.10(i). The Commission’s
approval would allow the Exchange to
continue to open for trading additional
series of options on such index without
interruption to the market and investor
participation.
The EM Index is designed to capture
large and mid-cap representation across
emerging market countries. In
particular, it is built to ‘‘be flexible
enough to adjust quickly to a constantly
changing opportunity set’’, that is,
emerging markets.4 It seeks ‘‘to
capitalize on the unique attributes of
these vibrant economies’’, which
includes ‘‘superior growth potential’’.5
Indeed, EM has experienced a
continuous rise in the number of its
component securities. When initially
listed on the Exchange in 2015, the EM
Index consisted of the following 23
emerging market country indexes:
Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech
Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India,
Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico,
Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia,
South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey
and United Arab Emirates. At that time,
the EM Index had 834 constituents
which covered approximately 85% of
the free float-adjusted market
capitalization in each country. Since its
initial listing, Argentina,6 Pakistan,7 and
Saudi Arabia 8 have joined the list of
countries represented in the EM Index.
Over recent years, the component
securities of the EM Index have grown
to a market capitalization of 5,582,502
(USD Millions) (up from 3,219,779 in
2016) and average market capitalization
per constituent of 4,644 (USD Millions)
(up from 3,847 in 2016). In addition to
this, the components securities have an
average daily volume of over 42 billion,
4 See
MSCI Emerging Markets Index brochure
(dated May 2019) located at: https://www.msci.com/
documents/1296102/15035999/USLetter-MIS-EMMay2019-cbr-en.pdf/fb580e1e-d54c-4c68-1314977bbff69bd7?t=1559125400402.
5 Id.
6 Added in June 2018.
7 Added in June 2017.
8 Added in June 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
and an average daily volume per
constituent of over 35 million.
Additionally, the largest constituent in
the EM Index currently only accounts
for 4.5% of the weight of the EM Index.9
Indeed, as a result of the growth of the
emerging markets represented, the index
has experienced continued expansion.
As of July 1, 2019, the number of
constituents in the EM Index had grown
to a total of 1,194, and, as of October 31,
2019, a total of 1,202 constituents. In
particular, the most notable expansion
has been the recent (2018) introduction
of Saudi Arabian securities (as indicated
above) and mainland China component
securities 10 into the EM Index. In early
2019, MSCI implemented a two-step
inclusion plan for Saudi Arabian
component securities and a three-step
inclusion plan for mainland China
component securities.11 The plan
‘‘phased-in’’ increases in the weight and
number of Saudi Arabian component
securities, which was completed in
August 2019,12 and the weight and
number of mainland China component
securities, which was completed in
November 2019.13 The Exchange notes
that the cumulative average growth rate
of the EM Index component securities
since 2015 has averaged 4.5% every six
months. In the six-month window from
January 2019 through July 2019 the EM
Index experienced approximately a
6.2% increase in component securities;
the majority of this increase was a direct
result of MSCI’s first inclusion phase of
Saudi Arabian and mainland China
component security. Though this was a
departure from the 4.5% average every
six months, the January 2019 through
July 2019 increase was contained within
the 10% threshold pursuant to Rule
4.10(i)(2). However, as a result of the
second inclusion phase for Saudi
9 See MSCI Emerging Markets Index fact sheet
(dated October 31, 2019) located at: https://
www.msci.com/documents/10199/c0db0a48-01f24ba9-ad01-226fd5678111.
10 China ‘‘A-Shares’’, which trade on the
Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock
Exchange.
11 See MSCI Implementation Q&A: Inclusion of
the MSCI Argentina, the MSCI Saudi Arabia
Indexes and China A Shares in the MSCI Emerging
Markets Indexes, at 17, 24 (May 2019) located at:
https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/
af029454-117c-f15c-8d5e-52aa627efa14.
12 See MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release,
MSCI Equity Indexes August 2019 Index Review
(August 7, 2019) located at: https://www.msci.com/
eqb/pressreleases/archive/MSCI_Aug19_QIRPR.pdf;
and MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release, MSCI
Equity Indexes May 2019 Index Review (May 13,
2019) located at: https://app2.msci.com/eqb/
pressreleases/archive/MSCI_May19_QIRPR.pdf.
13 See MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release,
MSCI Equity Indexes November 2019 Index review
(November 7, 2019) located at: https://
www.msci.com/eqb/pressreleases/archive/MSCI_
Nov19_QIRPR.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Arabian and mainland China shares in
August 2019, coupled with the third,
and last, inclusion phase for mainland
China shares in November 2019, the EM
Index has surpassed a 10% increase
from July 2019, and therefore, will be
non-compliant with the component
securities threshold for the Exchange’s
next bi-annual review of the component
securities as-of January 1, 2020.
Specifically, as a result of the August
2019 and November 2019 inclusions,
the EM Index has experienced
approximately a 17% increase from July
2019 (1,202 component securities at this
time) to November 2019 (a total of 1,410
component securities after the
November 2019 inclusion). The
Exchange notes that this significant
increase since July 2019 is an isolated
departure from the 4.5% average sixmonth increases the EM Index has
typically and steadily experienced since
2015. The Exchange further notes that
the component securities threshold was
the only threshold implicated as a result
of MSCI’s inclusion plan, and that the
other threshold tests applicable to the
EM Index under Rule 4.10(h) will be
met as-of January 1, 2019 [sic]. As such,
the Exchange respectfully requests that
the Commission approve the continued
listing of options on the EM Index in
connection with the component
securities threshold beginning January
1, 2020, as provided in Rule 4.10(i).
The Exchange believes that MSCI’s
recent inclusion plans are an exception
to the normal course of the MSCI index
reviews. The timing of the inclusion
plans for the two, rapidly expanding
markets arose around the same time,
due to similar market overhauls
separately undertaken by Saudi Arabia
and China. In the recent years, Saudi
Arabian markets have increased
privatization and implemented several
enhancements that further opened their
markets to international institutional
investors, while the Chinese
government has eased previously strict
access controls on the their markets.14
As a result of these developments, MSCI
conducted ‘‘extensive global
consultation with a large number of
international institutional investors,
including asset owners, asset managers,
broker/dealers and other market
14 See MSCI Press Release, MSCI Will Increase the
Weight of China A Shares in MSCI Indexes
(February 28, 2019) located at: https://
www.msci.com/documents/10199/238444/China_
A_Further_Weight_Increase_PR_Eng.pdf/43f3ee8b5182-68d4-a758-2968b4206e54; see also MSCI Press
Release, Results of the MSCI 2018 Market
Classification Review (June 20, 2018) located at:
https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/95fa3628ff2e-e9cd-53b9-8912329ec40c (discussing the
decision to include Saudi Arabia).
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
participants worldwide,’’ 15 in order to
ultimately implement the inclusion
plans. The Exchange also notes that,
although MSCI announced the inclusion
phase-in plan prior to its
implementation, the number of
component securities actually added (or
removed as part of MSCI’s regular
quarterly reviews) in each phase was
unknown until the August 2019 and
November 2019 review releases.
The Exchange notes that the 10%
threshold is designed to prevent
significant adjustments to the number of
EM Index constituents, particularly
decreases that could: (i) Reduce
component securities in the EM Index to
a point that would raise manipulation
concerns; or (ii) change the general
character of the EM Index over which
index options are issued. The 10%
threshold is designed to allow for the
more rapid, shorter-term changes (e.g.,
an average 4.5% increase in constituents
every six-months, and occasional
increases from this, like the 6.2%
increase from January 2019 through July
2019 as a result of the one inclusion
phase) experienced by emerging markets
that the EM Index is designed to
capture. The current threshold is
aligned with the way the EM Index has
grown over the past four years and is
expected to continue growing.16
As noted above, the 10% threshold is
designed to prevent material increases
that could change the character of the
index over which broad-based index
options are issued. The Exchange does
not believe that the increase described
herein changes the character of the EM
Index. Unlike an index that is meant to
represent a relatively fixed constituent
count reflection of large-cap stocks,
such as the S&P 500 Index, the EM
Index contains mid-cap components
and is designed to be flexible to change
over time as the represented markets
change. Given the increasingly high
number of constituents and
capitalization of the EM Index, the deep
and liquid markets for the securities
underlying the index, and the low
15 See
id.
Exchange also notes that the generic listing
standards applicable to ETPs listed on other
national securities exchanges (e.g., Cboe BZX
Exchange Rule 14.11(c)(3)(A)(ii)) do not include any
requirements based on the increase or decrease in
component securities, and instead only require that
an ETP based on an index that includes non-U.S.
component stocks includes at least 20 component
securities, among other diversification, liquidity,
and market cap requirements. As such, an ETP
based on the EM Index would not be delisted based
on a percentage increase or decrease in component
securities as long as it continued to have at least
20 component securities. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that the proposed threshold is more
restrictive than the current standard for listing
products on the EM Index.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
16 The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
percentage each constituent comprises
of the total EM Index weight, and
normally steady recent growth patterns,
the concerns that a further increase,
even such a significant 17% increase, in
component securities would change the
character of the index or allow for
potential market manipulation and/or
disruption in the underlying markets are
greatly reduced. As stated above, the
17% increase is an outlying departure
from the incremental increases the EM
Index typically experiences.
The Exchange notes that significant
decreases, as opposed to increases like
those described herein, are more likely
to raise concerns related to
manipulation and/or disruption in the
underlying markets, although the
Exchange does not believe that a
decrease in the number of constituents
in any index, even by an amount greater
than 10%, necessarily gives rise to
manipulation concerns. Further, the
Exchange currently maintains ‘‘watch
lists’’ made up of countries and indexes
with large constituent count changes
which it reviews at least quarterly. The
Exchange also conducts intermediate
reviews on at least a quarterly basis to
identify potential compliance concerns
in connection with the continued listing
standards in advance of its formal semiannual index maintenance reviews. If
the Exchange determines from its
reviews that a change in the EM Index’s
composition would affect the protection
of investors, it may cease listing series
on the EM Index pursuant to Rule 4.4,
notwithstanding Commission approval
to continue listing options or if an index
is still compliant with the component
security threshold. The Exchange
believes the frequency of these reviews
will continue to successfully identify
and address continued listing
compliance concerns that the
component securities threshold is also
designed to address for the EM Index.
The Exchange further notes that EM
Options are currently listed for trading
on the Exchange and that the Exchange
generally adds new series after an
expiration, which allows trading to
commence in the new series on the first
trading day after the expiration date.
The Exchange currently lists EM options
that expire monthly, as well as Fridayexpiring weekly options. In addition to
this, the Exchange offers FLEX options
on this index, which may only be listed
if the standard options on an index are
authorized to be listed. Specifically,
without the Commission’s approval,
additional series of weekly EM options
may no longer be scheduled to be
added, nor will additional monthly
series after expiration on January 17,
2020, which would allow trading to
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72411
commence in the additional series on
the next trading day of January 20, 2020.
In light of MSCI’s November 2019
inclusion, market participants have
already begun to express concern to the
Exchange regarding interruption in their
trading of series on the EM Index come
January 2020 as a result of noncompliance with the Exchange’s
component securities threshold. Indeed,
market participants that intend to write
optionality with weekly expiration dates
in the first weeks of January 2020 will,
instead, have to take their volume OTC.
This poses counter party risks to which
a market participant would not
otherwise have exposure if series were
available on the EM Index. The inability
to add the EM options would be a
detriment to market participants seeking
to hedge portfolios indexed to the EM
Index, positions in ETPs based on the
EM Index (e.g., EEM), options on EEM
and futures on the EM Index, and
European-traded derivatives on the EM
Index. Further, there are ETPs that use
options on the EM Index as part of their
investment strategy. Without the ability
to add the EM options, these ETPs could
be unable to achieve their investment
objective, to the detriment of investors.
Additionally, to the extent market
participants want to roll a position in
EM options that expire in January to
series at a later expiration date and at a
favorable or comparable price, they will
be prevented from doing so without the
Commission’s approval for continued
listing. Furthermore, in the time in
which the Exchange may not list
additional series on the EM Index, FLEX
trades which may result in the creation
of new FLEX series will be nullified,
which may cause confusion and prove
burdensome to market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.17 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 18 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
17 15
18 15
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
31DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
72412
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 19 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
Commission’s approval to continue
listing options on the EM Index will
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest, because it will allow the
Exchange to continue to list EM Options
in light of the recent inclusion plan
exceptions to MSCI’s normal course of
reviews. As stated above, the 10%
threshold is intended to prevent
significant changes over shorter periods
of time in the EM Index that might
potentially change the character of the
index or make it more susceptible to
manipulation. Given that the EM Index
itself is designed to capture and allow
for continuous emerging market growth
and trends and that the 17% constituent
increase appears to be only a temporary
departure from the normal incremental
growth experienced by the EM Index,
the Exchange does not believe that the
recent increase changes the character of
the EM Index or otherwise raises
concerns of market manipulation and/or
disruption in the underlying markets.
As a general principle, increases in the
elements that make up an index, such
as market capitalization and the weight
and number component securities, do
not in and of themselves do not lead to
manipulation and/or disruption. This
general principle applies to the recent
inclusions, therefore, the Exchange does
not believe the index has become
susceptible to manipulation and/or
disruption as a result. Although
significant decreases, not increases,
would be more likely to raise concerns
related to manipulation and/or
disruption in the underlying markets,
the Exchange notes that it does not
believe that a decrease in the number of
constituents in any index, even by an
amount greater than 10%, necessarily
creates manipulation concerns. The
Exchange also does not believe that the
EM Index is otherwise easily susceptible
to manipulation, as it is a broad-based
index, its component securities have a
high market capitalization, it has an
average daily volume of over 42 billion,
and no single component comprises
19 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
more than 4.5% of the index. The
Exchange also notes that a total
component securities standard, as
provided in Rule 4.10(i)(2), is not
essential to the continued listing
standards for EM Index-based products,
and, instead, is an additional protection
against potential manipulation and/or
disruption in the underlying securities.
Because the EM Index has continued to
experience incremental increases in
component securities (notwithstanding
the exceptional increase as a result of
the 2019 inclusion plan), capitalization,
and market liquidity in line with
continuous emerging market growth
trends and the EM’s overall investment
objectives, the Exchange does not
believe that the continued listing of the
EM Index following the inclusion plan
would circumvent the additional
protections of the component securities
threshold nor would it affect the
protection of investors and the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market. In addition to this, the Exchange
continues to maintain and review
country and index watch lists, as well
as conduct intermediate reviews on at
least a quarterly basis. Thus, it
continues to be able to identify potential
compliance concerns in connection
with the continued listing standards and
may cease listing series on the EM Index
at any time if it determines that a
change in the index’s composition
would affect the protection of investors.
As stated above, without the
Commission’s approval, the Exchange
would not be able to list new series of
weekly or monthly options on the EM
Index after the January 2020 review. The
Exchange believes that the
Commission’s approval to continue
listing options on the EM Index is
necessary for the protection of investors
and the public interest, as without such,
the Exchange will be prevented from
adding the weekly and monthly EM
options. Indeed, market participants
that intend to write optionality with
weekly expiration dates in the first
weeks of January 2020 will, instead,
have to take their volume OTC. OTC
poses counter party risks for investors
that they would not normally otherwise
choose to be subject to if series on the
EM Index were available for trading.
The inability to add the EM options
would be a detriment to market
participants seeking to hedge positions
in ETPs based on the EM Index (e.g.,
EEM), options on EEM and EM futures,
and European-traded derivatives on the
EM Index. Further, there are ETPs that
use options on the EM Index as part of
their investment strategy. Without the
ability to add the EM options, these
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ETPs could be unable to achieve their
investment objective, to the detriment of
investors. Additionally, market
participants that wish to roll a position
in EM options that expire in January to
a position in a series with a later
expiration month at a favorable or
comparable price, will be prevented
from doing so without this amendment.
Furthermore, in the time in which the
Exchange may not list additional series
on EM, FLEX trades which may result
in the creation of new FLEX series will
be nullified, which may cause confusion
and prove burdensome to market
participants. The Exchange also notes
that since the last inclusion phase was
implemented in MSCI’s November 2019
review, multiple market participants
have expressed their concern to the
Exchange regarding interruption of their
activity in EM Index series as a result of
anticipated non-compliance with the
component securities threshold.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the continued listing of options on the
EM Index, and the Commission’s
approval of which the Exchange seeks,
would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. The Exchange does
not believe the continued listing would
impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the Act as
it would facilitate the continued,
uninterrupted trading of options on the
EM Index, on which series are currently
listed and readily available for all
market participants to trade, as would
be the case for series added following
the approval for the EM Index’s
continued listing.
The Exchange does not believe that
the continued listing of options on the
EM Index would impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the Act as it does not alter the types
of products offered by the Exchange in
which market participants already may
choose to participate. The Commission’s
approval would merely allow the
Exchange to continue listing certain
index options in light of the MSCI’s
recent completion of its inclusion plan
and the Exchange would continue to
adequately surveil for any concerning
changes.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
Number SR–CBOE–2019–122 and
should be submitted on or before
January 21, 2020.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2019–122 on the subject line.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–122. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of this
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the Exchange’s proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a
national securities exchange.20 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) 21 of the Exchange
Act, which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange be designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and
not be designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission first notes the
Exchange’s statement that the 17%
increase in component securities from
July 2019 to November 2019 under
MSCI’s recent inclusion plans is an
isolated departure from the 4.5%
average six-month increases the MSCI
EM Index has since 2015. Additionally,
the Exchange points out that the 10%
component-securities threshold was the
only threshold implicated as a result of
MSCI’s inclusion plan, and that the
other threshold tests applicable to the
EM Index under Rule 4.10(h) will be
met as-of January 1, 2020.
Furthermore, the Exchange explains
that the 10% component-securities
threshold under Rule 4.10(i) is designed
to prevent significant adjustments to the
number of EM Index constituents,
particularly decreases, that could: (i)
Reduce component securities in the EM
Index to a point that would raise
manipulation concerns; or (ii) change
the general character of the EM Index
over which index options are issued.
The Exchange states that the 10%
component-securities threshold is
designed to allow for the more rapid,
shorter-term changes, such as the recent
4.5% average six-month increases the
MSCI EM Index has typically and
steadily experienced since 2015. The
Exchange also does not believe that the
EM Index is otherwise easily susceptible
to manipulation, as it is a broad-based
20 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule’s
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72413
index, its component securities have a
high market capitalization, it has an
average daily volume of over 42 billion,
and no single component comprises
more than 4.5% of the index. Finally,
the Exchange asserts that as a general
principle, increases in the elements that
make up an index, such as market
capitalization and the weight and
number component securities, do not in
and of themselves lead to manipulation
and/or disruption; the Exchange then
concludes that this general principle
applies to the recent MSCI inclusions of
its EM Index.
Based on the foregoing and after
careful consideration, the Commission
finds it consistent with Exchange Act to
to allow the Exchange to open for
trading any additional series of options
of MSCI EM options class
notwithstanding the maintence standard
set forth in Rule 4.10(i). The
Commission believes that allowing an
exception to the 10% componentsecurities threshold under these specific
circumstances is consistent with the
purpose behind Rule 4.10, and
therefore, is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade and to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market.
Specifically, the increase in component
securities under the recent MSCI
inclusion plan does not appear likely to
lead to market manipulation or
disruption. Furthermore, this 17%
increase in component securities does
not appear to change the general
character of the EM Index over which
index options are issued. Accordingly,
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act.
The Exchange has requested that
Commission finds good cause for
approving the proposed rule change
prior to the 30th day after the date of
publication of notice of in the Federal
Register. The Exchange represents that,
although MSCI announced the inclusion
phase-in plan prior to its
implementation, the number of
component securities actually added (or
removed as part of MSCI’s regular
quarterly reviews) in each phase was
unknown until the August 2019 and
November 2019 review releases.
Furthemore, the Exchange asserts that
investors and other market participants
will likely be harmed if the Exchange is
not able to list new series of weekly or
monthly options on the EM Index after
January 1, 2020. First, market
participants that intend to write
optionality with weekly expiration dates
in the first weeks of January 2020 will,
instead, have to take their volume OTC;
the Exchange believes that OTC poses
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
72414
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 250 / Tuesday, December 31, 2019 / Notices
counter party risks for investors that
they would not normally otherwise
choose to be subject to if series on the
EM Index were available for trading.
Next, the Exchange states that the
inability to add the EM options would
be a detriment to market participants
seeking to hedge positions in ETPs
based on the EM Index (e.g., EEM),
options on EEM and EM futures, and
European-traded derivatives on the EM
Index. Likewise, the Exchange notes
that there are ETPs that use options on
the EM Index as part of their investment
strategy. Without the ability to add the
EM options, these ETPs could be unable
to achieve their investment objective,
which the Exchange believes would be
to the detriment of investors.
Additionally, the Exchange states that
market participants that wish to roll a
position in EM options that expire in
January to a position in a series with a
later expiration month at a favorable or
comparable price, will be prevented
from doing so should the Commission
not approve this proposal prior to
January 1, 2020.
Based on the foregoing, the
Commission believes that good cause
exists to issue this order approving a
one-time exception to the 10%
component-securities threshold under
Rule 4.10(i) prior to the 30th day after
the date of publication of notice of in
the Federal Register. Approving the
proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis should protect investors and the
public interest from potential harm that
might arise from a disruption in the
listing of classes of options on the MSCI
Emerging Markets Index. Accordingly,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,22 the Commission finds
good cause to approve the proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis.
V. Conclusion
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,23
that the proposed rule change (SR–
CBOE–2019–122) be, and it hereby is,
approved on an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–28215 Filed 12–30–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
24 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87856; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2019–107]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt
Rule 14.11(m), Portfolio Fund Shares,
and To List and Trade Shares of the
Fidelity Value ETF, Fidelity Growth
ETF, and Fidelity Opportunistic ETF,
Each a Series of the Fidelity Beach
Street Trust, Under Proposed Rule
14.11(m)
December 23, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
12, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes a rule change
to adopt Rule 14.11(m), Portfolio Fund
Shares, and to list and trade shares of
the Fidelity Value ETF, Fidelity Growth
ETF, and Fidelity Opportunistic ETF
(each a ‘‘Fund’’ and, collectively, the
‘‘Funds’’), each a series of the Fidelity
Beach Street Trust (the ‘‘Trust’’), under
such proposed Rule 14.11(m). The
shares of each Fund are referred to
herein as the ‘‘Shares.’’ The text of the
proposed rule change is also available
on the Exchange’s website (https://
markets.cboe.com/us/equities/
regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
22 15
23 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 30, 2019
1 15
2 17
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to add new
Rule 14.11(m) 3 for the purpose of
permitting the listing and trading, or
trading pursuant to unlisted trading
privileges, of Portfolio Fund Shares,
which are securities issued by an
actively managed open-end
management investment company.4
Proposed Rule 14.11(m)
Proposed Rule 14.11(m)(3)(A)
provides that the term ‘‘Portfolio Fund
Share’’ means a security that: (i)
Represents an interest in a registered
investment company (‘‘Investment
Company’’) organized as an open-end
management investment company or
3 The Exchange notes that it is proposing new
Rule 14.11(m) because it has also proposed a new
Rule 14.11(k) and new Rule 14.11(l) under two
separate proposals. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 87062 (September 23, 2019), 84 FR
51193 (September 27, 2019) (SR–CboeBZX–2019–
047) and 87560 (November 18, 2019), 84 FR 64607
(November 22, 2019) (CboeBZX–2019–097).
4 The basis of this proposal are several
applications for exemptive relief that were filed
with the Commission and for which public notice
was issued on November 14, 2019 (the ‘‘Notice’’)
and subsequent order granting certain exemptive
relief to, among others, Fidelity Management &
Research Company and FMR Co., Inc., Fidelity
Beach Street Trust, and Fidelity Distributors
Corporation (File No. 812–14364), issued on
December 10, 2019 (the ‘‘Order’’ and, collectively,
with the Application and the Notice, the
‘‘Exemptive Order’’). See Investment Company Act
Release Nos. 33683 and 33712. The Order
specifically notes that ‘‘granting the requested
exemptions is appropriate in and consistent with
the public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
It is further found that the terms of the proposed
transactions, including the consideration to be paid
or received, are reasonable and fair and do not
involve overreaching on the part of any person
concerned, and that the proposed transactions are
consistent with the policy of each registered
investment company concerned and with the
general purposes of the Act.’’ The Exchange notes
that it also referred to the application for exemptive
relief orders for T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and
T. Rowe Price Equity Series, Inc. (File No. 812–
14214 and Investment Company Act Release Nos.
33685 and 33713), Natixis ETF Trust II, et al. (File
No. 812–14870 and Investment Company Act
Release Nos. 33684 and 33711), Blue Tractor ETF
Trust and Blue Tractor Group, LLC (File No. 812–
14625 and Investment Company Act Release Nos.
33682 and 33710), and Gabelli ETFs Trust, et al.
(File No. 812–15036 and Investment Company Act
Release Nos. 33681 and 33708). While there are
certain differences between the applications, the
Exchange believes that each would qualify as
Portfolio Fund Shares under proposed Rule
14.11(m).
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 250 (Tuesday, December 31, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72409-72414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-87852; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change To Allow the Exchange To Continue To List Classes of Options on
the MSCI Emerging Markets Index After January 1, 2020
December 23, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on December 12, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons and, for the reasons
discussed below, is issuing this order approving the proposed rule
change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. seeks approval from the Securities and Exchange
Commission to continue listing classes of options on the MSCI EM Index.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to seek approval pursuant to Rule 4.10(i) for
the continued listing of options on the EM Index (``EM Options''). Rule
4.10(i) establishes maintenance listing standards that apply to options
on the EM Index \3\ and also provides that in the event a class of
index options listed on the Exchange fails to satisfy the maintenance
listing standards, the Exchange shall not open for trading any
additional series of options of that class unless the continued listing
of that class of index options has been approved by the Commission
under Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act. Specifically, Rule
4.10(i)(2), requires that the total number of component securities in
the EM Index
[[Page 72410]]
may not increase or decrease by more than 10% over the last six-month
period (the ``component securities threshold''). Due to global market
trends and the overall objectives of the EM Index, as described below,
the Exchange has become aware that the EM Index will not meet this
requirement for the next bi-annual index surveillance review of the EM
Index components as-of January 1, 2020. Thus, the Exchange now seeks
the Commission's approval for the continued listing of options on the
EM Index, specifically, in connection with the component securities
threshold, beginning January 1, 2020, as provided in Rule 4.10(i). The
Commission's approval would allow the Exchange to continue to open for
trading additional series of options on such index without interruption
to the market and investor participation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ As well as the MSCI EAFE, FTSE Emerging and FTSE Developed
Europe indexes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EM Index is designed to capture large and mid-cap
representation across emerging market countries. In particular, it is
built to ``be flexible enough to adjust quickly to a constantly
changing opportunity set'', that is, emerging markets.\4\ It seeks ``to
capitalize on the unique attributes of these vibrant economies'', which
includes ``superior growth potential''.\5\ Indeed, EM has experienced a
continuous rise in the number of its component securities. When
initially listed on the Exchange in 2015, the EM Index consisted of the
following 23 emerging market country indexes: Brazil, Chile, China,
Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia,
Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Russia,
South Africa, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. At
that time, the EM Index had 834 constituents which covered
approximately 85% of the free float-adjusted market capitalization in
each country. Since its initial listing, Argentina,\6\ Pakistan,\7\ and
Saudi Arabia \8\ have joined the list of countries represented in the
EM Index. Over recent years, the component securities of the EM Index
have grown to a market capitalization of 5,582,502 (USD Millions) (up
from 3,219,779 in 2016) and average market capitalization per
constituent of 4,644 (USD Millions) (up from 3,847 in 2016). In
addition to this, the components securities have an average daily
volume of over 42 billion, and an average daily volume per constituent
of over 35 million. Additionally, the largest constituent in the EM
Index currently only accounts for 4.5% of the weight of the EM
Index.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See MSCI Emerging Markets Index brochure (dated May 2019)
located at: https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/15035999/USLetter-MIS-EM-May2019-cbr-en.pdf/fb580e1e-d54c-4c68-1314-977bbff69bd7?t=1559125400402.
\5\ Id.
\6\ Added in June 2018.
\7\ Added in June 2017.
\8\ Added in June 2018.
\9\ See MSCI Emerging Markets Index fact sheet (dated October
31, 2019) located at: https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/c0db0a48-01f2-4ba9-ad01-226fd5678111.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed, as a result of the growth of the emerging markets
represented, the index has experienced continued expansion. As of July
1, 2019, the number of constituents in the EM Index had grown to a
total of 1,194, and, as of October 31, 2019, a total of 1,202
constituents. In particular, the most notable expansion has been the
recent (2018) introduction of Saudi Arabian securities (as indicated
above) and mainland China component securities \10\ into the EM Index.
In early 2019, MSCI implemented a two-step inclusion plan for Saudi
Arabian component securities and a three-step inclusion plan for
mainland China component securities.\11\ The plan ``phased-in''
increases in the weight and number of Saudi Arabian component
securities, which was completed in August 2019,\12\ and the weight and
number of mainland China component securities, which was completed in
November 2019.\13\ The Exchange notes that the cumulative average
growth rate of the EM Index component securities since 2015 has
averaged 4.5% every six months. In the six-month window from January
2019 through July 2019 the EM Index experienced approximately a 6.2%
increase in component securities; the majority of this increase was a
direct result of MSCI's first inclusion phase of Saudi Arabian and
mainland China component security. Though this was a departure from the
4.5% average every six months, the January 2019 through July 2019
increase was contained within the 10% threshold pursuant to Rule
4.10(i)(2). However, as a result of the second inclusion phase for
Saudi Arabian and mainland China shares in August 2019, coupled with
the third, and last, inclusion phase for mainland China shares in
November 2019, the EM Index has surpassed a 10% increase from July
2019, and therefore, will be non-compliant with the component
securities threshold for the Exchange's next bi-annual review of the
component securities as-of January 1, 2020. Specifically, as a result
of the August 2019 and November 2019 inclusions, the EM Index has
experienced approximately a 17% increase from July 2019 (1,202
component securities at this time) to November 2019 (a total of 1,410
component securities after the November 2019 inclusion). The Exchange
notes that this significant increase since July 2019 is an isolated
departure from the 4.5% average six-month increases the EM Index has
typically and steadily experienced since 2015. The Exchange further
notes that the component securities threshold was the only threshold
implicated as a result of MSCI's inclusion plan, and that the other
threshold tests applicable to the EM Index under Rule 4.10(h) will be
met as-of January 1, 2019 [sic]. As such, the Exchange respectfully
requests that the Commission approve the continued listing of options
on the EM Index in connection with the component securities threshold
beginning January 1, 2020, as provided in Rule 4.10(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ China ``A-Shares'', which trade on the Shanghai Stock
Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange.
\11\ See MSCI Implementation Q&A: Inclusion of the MSCI
Argentina, the MSCI Saudi Arabia Indexes and China A Shares in the
MSCI Emerging Markets Indexes, at 17, 24 (May 2019) located at:
https://www.msci.com/documents/1296102/af029454-117c-f15c-8d5e-52aa627efa14.
\12\ See MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release, MSCI Equity
Indexes August 2019 Index Review (August 7, 2019) located at:
https://www.msci.com/eqb/pressreleases/archive/MSCI_Aug19_QIRPR.pdf;
and MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release, MSCI Equity Indexes May
2019 Index Review (May 13, 2019) located at: https://app2.msci.com/eqb/pressreleases/archive/MSCI_May19_QIRPR.pdf.
\13\ See MSCI Emerging Markets Press Release, MSCI Equity
Indexes November 2019 Index review (November 7, 2019) located at:
https://www.msci.com/eqb/pressreleases/archive/MSCI_Nov19_QIRPR.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that MSCI's recent inclusion plans are an
exception to the normal course of the MSCI index reviews. The timing of
the inclusion plans for the two, rapidly expanding markets arose around
the same time, due to similar market overhauls separately undertaken by
Saudi Arabia and China. In the recent years, Saudi Arabian markets have
increased privatization and implemented several enhancements that
further opened their markets to international institutional investors,
while the Chinese government has eased previously strict access
controls on the their markets.\14\ As a result of these developments,
MSCI conducted ``extensive global consultation with a large number of
international institutional investors, including asset owners, asset
managers, broker/dealers and other market
[[Page 72411]]
participants worldwide,'' \15\ in order to ultimately implement the
inclusion plans. The Exchange also notes that, although MSCI announced
the inclusion phase-in plan prior to its implementation, the number of
component securities actually added (or removed as part of MSCI's
regular quarterly reviews) in each phase was unknown until the August
2019 and November 2019 review releases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See MSCI Press Release, MSCI Will Increase the Weight of
China A Shares in MSCI Indexes (February 28, 2019) located at:
https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/238444/China_A_Further_Weight_Increase_PR_Eng.pdf/43f3ee8b-5182-68d4-a758-2968b4206e54; see also MSCI Press Release, Results of the MSCI 2018
Market Classification Review (June 20, 2018) located at: https://www.msci.com/documents/10199/95fa3628-ff2e-e9cd-53b9-8912329ec40c
(discussing the decision to include Saudi Arabia).
\15\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the 10% threshold is designed to prevent
significant adjustments to the number of EM Index constituents,
particularly decreases that could: (i) Reduce component securities in
the EM Index to a point that would raise manipulation concerns; or (ii)
change the general character of the EM Index over which index options
are issued. The 10% threshold is designed to allow for the more rapid,
shorter-term changes (e.g., an average 4.5% increase in constituents
every six-months, and occasional increases from this, like the 6.2%
increase from January 2019 through July 2019 as a result of the one
inclusion phase) experienced by emerging markets that the EM Index is
designed to capture. The current threshold is aligned with the way the
EM Index has grown over the past four years and is expected to continue
growing.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The Exchange also notes that the generic listing standards
applicable to ETPs listed on other national securities exchanges
(e.g., Cboe BZX Exchange Rule 14.11(c)(3)(A)(ii)) do not include any
requirements based on the increase or decrease in component
securities, and instead only require that an ETP based on an index
that includes non-U.S. component stocks includes at least 20
component securities, among other diversification, liquidity, and
market cap requirements. As such, an ETP based on the EM Index would
not be delisted based on a percentage increase or decrease in
component securities as long as it continued to have at least 20
component securities. Therefore, the Exchange believes that the
proposed threshold is more restrictive than the current standard for
listing products on the EM Index.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, the 10% threshold is designed to prevent material
increases that could change the character of the index over which
broad-based index options are issued. The Exchange does not believe
that the increase described herein changes the character of the EM
Index. Unlike an index that is meant to represent a relatively fixed
constituent count reflection of large-cap stocks, such as the S&P 500
Index, the EM Index contains mid-cap components and is designed to be
flexible to change over time as the represented markets change. Given
the increasingly high number of constituents and capitalization of the
EM Index, the deep and liquid markets for the securities underlying the
index, and the low percentage each constituent comprises of the total
EM Index weight, and normally steady recent growth patterns, the
concerns that a further increase, even such a significant 17% increase,
in component securities would change the character of the index or
allow for potential market manipulation and/or disruption in the
underlying markets are greatly reduced. As stated above, the 17%
increase is an outlying departure from the incremental increases the EM
Index typically experiences.
The Exchange notes that significant decreases, as opposed to
increases like those described herein, are more likely to raise
concerns related to manipulation and/or disruption in the underlying
markets, although the Exchange does not believe that a decrease in the
number of constituents in any index, even by an amount greater than
10%, necessarily gives rise to manipulation concerns. Further, the
Exchange currently maintains ``watch lists'' made up of countries and
indexes with large constituent count changes which it reviews at least
quarterly. The Exchange also conducts intermediate reviews on at least
a quarterly basis to identify potential compliance concerns in
connection with the continued listing standards in advance of its
formal semi-annual index maintenance reviews. If the Exchange
determines from its reviews that a change in the EM Index's composition
would affect the protection of investors, it may cease listing series
on the EM Index pursuant to Rule 4.4, notwithstanding Commission
approval to continue listing options or if an index is still compliant
with the component security threshold. The Exchange believes the
frequency of these reviews will continue to successfully identify and
address continued listing compliance concerns that the component
securities threshold is also designed to address for the EM Index.
The Exchange further notes that EM Options are currently listed for
trading on the Exchange and that the Exchange generally adds new series
after an expiration, which allows trading to commence in the new series
on the first trading day after the expiration date. The Exchange
currently lists EM options that expire monthly, as well as Friday-
expiring weekly options. In addition to this, the Exchange offers FLEX
options on this index, which may only be listed if the standard options
on an index are authorized to be listed. Specifically, without the
Commission's approval, additional series of weekly EM options may no
longer be scheduled to be added, nor will additional monthly series
after expiration on January 17, 2020, which would allow trading to
commence in the additional series on the next trading day of January
20, 2020.
In light of MSCI's November 2019 inclusion, market participants
have already begun to express concern to the Exchange regarding
interruption in their trading of series on the EM Index come January
2020 as a result of non-compliance with the Exchange's component
securities threshold. Indeed, market participants that intend to write
optionality with weekly expiration dates in the first weeks of January
2020 will, instead, have to take their volume OTC. This poses counter
party risks to which a market participant would not otherwise have
exposure if series were available on the EM Index. The inability to add
the EM options would be a detriment to market participants seeking to
hedge portfolios indexed to the EM Index, positions in ETPs based on
the EM Index (e.g., EEM), options on EEM and futures on the EM Index,
and European-traded derivatives on the EM Index. Further, there are
ETPs that use options on the EM Index as part of their investment
strategy. Without the ability to add the EM options, these ETPs could
be unable to achieve their investment objective, to the detriment of
investors. Additionally, to the extent market participants want to roll
a position in EM options that expire in January to series at a later
expiration date and at a favorable or comparable price, they will be
prevented from doing so without the Commission's approval for continued
listing. Furthermore, in the time in which the Exchange may not list
additional series on the EM Index, FLEX trades which may result in the
creation of new FLEX series will be nullified, which may cause
confusion and prove burdensome to market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
[[Page 72412]]
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \19\ requirement that the rules
of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the Commission's approval to continue
listing options on the EM Index will remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system,
and, in general, protect investors and the public interest, because it
will allow the Exchange to continue to list EM Options in light of the
recent inclusion plan exceptions to MSCI's normal course of reviews. As
stated above, the 10% threshold is intended to prevent significant
changes over shorter periods of time in the EM Index that might
potentially change the character of the index or make it more
susceptible to manipulation. Given that the EM Index itself is designed
to capture and allow for continuous emerging market growth and trends
and that the 17% constituent increase appears to be only a temporary
departure from the normal incremental growth experienced by the EM
Index, the Exchange does not believe that the recent increase changes
the character of the EM Index or otherwise raises concerns of market
manipulation and/or disruption in the underlying markets. As a general
principle, increases in the elements that make up an index, such as
market capitalization and the weight and number component securities,
do not in and of themselves do not lead to manipulation and/or
disruption. This general principle applies to the recent inclusions,
therefore, the Exchange does not believe the index has become
susceptible to manipulation and/or disruption as a result. Although
significant decreases, not increases, would be more likely to raise
concerns related to manipulation and/or disruption in the underlying
markets, the Exchange notes that it does not believe that a decrease in
the number of constituents in any index, even by an amount greater than
10%, necessarily creates manipulation concerns. The Exchange also does
not believe that the EM Index is otherwise easily susceptible to
manipulation, as it is a broad-based index, its component securities
have a high market capitalization, it has an average daily volume of
over 42 billion, and no single component comprises more than 4.5% of
the index. The Exchange also notes that a total component securities
standard, as provided in Rule 4.10(i)(2), is not essential to the
continued listing standards for EM Index-based products, and, instead,
is an additional protection against potential manipulation and/or
disruption in the underlying securities. Because the EM Index has
continued to experience incremental increases in component securities
(notwithstanding the exceptional increase as a result of the 2019
inclusion plan), capitalization, and market liquidity in line with
continuous emerging market growth trends and the EM's overall
investment objectives, the Exchange does not believe that the continued
listing of the EM Index following the inclusion plan would circumvent
the additional protections of the component securities threshold nor
would it affect the protection of investors and the maintenance of a
fair and orderly market. In addition to this, the Exchange continues to
maintain and review country and index watch lists, as well as conduct
intermediate reviews on at least a quarterly basis. Thus, it continues
to be able to identify potential compliance concerns in connection with
the continued listing standards and may cease listing series on the EM
Index at any time if it determines that a change in the index's
composition would affect the protection of investors.
As stated above, without the Commission's approval, the Exchange
would not be able to list new series of weekly or monthly options on
the EM Index after the January 2020 review. The Exchange believes that
the Commission's approval to continue listing options on the EM Index
is necessary for the protection of investors and the public interest,
as without such, the Exchange will be prevented from adding the weekly
and monthly EM options. Indeed, market participants that intend to
write optionality with weekly expiration dates in the first weeks of
January 2020 will, instead, have to take their volume OTC. OTC poses
counter party risks for investors that they would not normally
otherwise choose to be subject to if series on the EM Index were
available for trading. The inability to add the EM options would be a
detriment to market participants seeking to hedge positions in ETPs
based on the EM Index (e.g., EEM), options on EEM and EM futures, and
European-traded derivatives on the EM Index. Further, there are ETPs
that use options on the EM Index as part of their investment strategy.
Without the ability to add the EM options, these ETPs could be unable
to achieve their investment objective, to the detriment of investors.
Additionally, market participants that wish to roll a position in EM
options that expire in January to a position in a series with a later
expiration month at a favorable or comparable price, will be prevented
from doing so without this amendment. Furthermore, in the time in which
the Exchange may not list additional series on EM, FLEX trades which
may result in the creation of new FLEX series will be nullified, which
may cause confusion and prove burdensome to market participants. The
Exchange also notes that since the last inclusion phase was implemented
in MSCI's November 2019 review, multiple market participants have
expressed their concern to the Exchange regarding interruption of their
activity in EM Index series as a result of anticipated non-compliance
with the component securities threshold.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the continued listing of options
on the EM Index, and the Commission's approval of which the Exchange
seeks, would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
does not believe the continued listing would impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the Act as it would facilitate the continued,
uninterrupted trading of options on the EM Index, on which series are
currently listed and readily available for all market participants to
trade, as would be the case for series added following the approval for
the EM Index's continued listing.
The Exchange does not believe that the continued listing of options
on the EM Index would impose any burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the Act as it does
not alter the types of products offered by the Exchange in which market
participants already may choose to participate. The Commission's
approval would merely allow the Exchange to continue listing certain
index options in light of the MSCI's recent completion of its inclusion
plan and the Exchange would continue to adequately surveil for any
concerning changes.
[[Page 72413]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-122 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-122. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of this filing will also be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-122 and should be submitted on
or before January 21, 2020.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission finds that the Exchange's
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\20\ In particular, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) \21\ of the
Exchange Act, which requires, among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general,
to protect investors and the public interest, and not be designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission first notes the Exchange's statement that the 17%
increase in component securities from July 2019 to November 2019 under
MSCI's recent inclusion plans is an isolated departure from the 4.5%
average six-month increases the MSCI EM Index has since 2015.
Additionally, the Exchange points out that the 10% component-securities
threshold was the only threshold implicated as a result of MSCI's
inclusion plan, and that the other threshold tests applicable to the EM
Index under Rule 4.10(h) will be met as-of January 1, 2020.
Furthermore, the Exchange explains that the 10% component-
securities threshold under Rule 4.10(i) is designed to prevent
significant adjustments to the number of EM Index constituents,
particularly decreases, that could: (i) Reduce component securities in
the EM Index to a point that would raise manipulation concerns; or (ii)
change the general character of the EM Index over which index options
are issued. The Exchange states that the 10% component-securities
threshold is designed to allow for the more rapid, shorter-term
changes, such as the recent 4.5% average six-month increases the MSCI
EM Index has typically and steadily experienced since 2015. The
Exchange also does not believe that the EM Index is otherwise easily
susceptible to manipulation, as it is a broad-based index, its
component securities have a high market capitalization, it has an
average daily volume of over 42 billion, and no single component
comprises more than 4.5% of the index. Finally, the Exchange asserts
that as a general principle, increases in the elements that make up an
index, such as market capitalization and the weight and number
component securities, do not in and of themselves lead to manipulation
and/or disruption; the Exchange then concludes that this general
principle applies to the recent MSCI inclusions of its EM Index.
Based on the foregoing and after careful consideration, the
Commission finds it consistent with Exchange Act to to allow the
Exchange to open for trading any additional series of options of MSCI
EM options class notwithstanding the maintence standard set forth in
Rule 4.10(i). The Commission believes that allowing an exception to the
10% component-securities threshold under these specific circumstances
is consistent with the purpose behind Rule 4.10, and therefore, is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market. Specifically, the increase in component securities under the
recent MSCI inclusion plan does not appear likely to lead to market
manipulation or disruption. Furthermore, this 17% increase in component
securities does not appear to change the general character of the EM
Index over which index options are issued. Accordingly, Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements
of the Exchange Act.
The Exchange has requested that Commission finds good cause for
approving the proposed rule change prior to the 30th day after the date
of publication of notice of in the Federal Register. The Exchange
represents that, although MSCI announced the inclusion phase-in plan
prior to its implementation, the number of component securities
actually added (or removed as part of MSCI's regular quarterly reviews)
in each phase was unknown until the August 2019 and November 2019
review releases. Furthemore, the Exchange asserts that investors and
other market participants will likely be harmed if the Exchange is not
able to list new series of weekly or monthly options on the EM Index
after January 1, 2020. First, market participants that intend to write
optionality with weekly expiration dates in the first weeks of January
2020 will, instead, have to take their volume OTC; the Exchange
believes that OTC poses
[[Page 72414]]
counter party risks for investors that they would not normally
otherwise choose to be subject to if series on the EM Index were
available for trading. Next, the Exchange states that the inability to
add the EM options would be a detriment to market participants seeking
to hedge positions in ETPs based on the EM Index (e.g., EEM), options
on EEM and EM futures, and European-traded derivatives on the EM Index.
Likewise, the Exchange notes that there are ETPs that use options on
the EM Index as part of their investment strategy. Without the ability
to add the EM options, these ETPs could be unable to achieve their
investment objective, which the Exchange believes would be to the
detriment of investors. Additionally, the Exchange states that market
participants that wish to roll a position in EM options that expire in
January to a position in a series with a later expiration month at a
favorable or comparable price, will be prevented from doing so should
the Commission not approve this proposal prior to January 1, 2020.
Based on the foregoing, the Commission believes that good cause
exists to issue this order approving a one-time exception to the 10%
component-securities threshold under Rule 4.10(i) prior to the 30th day
after the date of publication of notice of in the Federal Register.
Approving the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis should
protect investors and the public interest from potential harm that
might arise from a disruption in the listing of classes of options on
the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\22\ the Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Exchange Act,\23\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2019-122) be,
and it hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-28215 Filed 12-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P