Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca Options Fees and Charges and the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges To Extend for One Year a Fee Discount for the Partial Cabinet Solution Bundles Offered in Connection With the Exchange's Co-location Services, 72071-72075 [2019-28168]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Notices
related fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges.
The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 21
For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule changes reflect this competitive
environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 22 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 23
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 24 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
21 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
24 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSENAT–2019–32 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSENAT–2019–32. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSENAT–2019–32
andshould be submitted on or before
January 21, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–28166 Filed 12–27–19; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87839; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2019–97]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE Arca
Options Fees and Charges and the
NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges
To Extend for One Year a Fee Discount
for the Partial Cabinet Solution
Bundles Offered in Connection With
the Exchange’s Co-location Services
December 23, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on December
16, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE
Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Options Fees and Charges
(the ‘‘Options Fee Schedule’’) and the
NYSE Arca Equities Fees and Charges
(the ‘‘Equities Fee Schedule’’ and,
together with the Options Fee Schedule,
the ‘‘Fee Schedules’’) to extend for one
year a fee discount for the Partial
Cabinet Solution bundles offered in
connection with the Exchange’s colocation services. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
25 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00182
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72071
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
72072
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Notices
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedules related to co-location 4
services to extend a fee discount for the
Partial Cabinet Solution (‘‘PCS’’)
bundles that the Exchange offers Users.5
There are four PCS bundles, each of
which includes a partial cabinet; access
to the Liquidity Center Network
(‘‘LCN’’) and internet protocol (‘‘IP’’)
network, the local area networks
available in the data center; two fiber
cross connections; and connectivity to
one of two time feeds.6 The PCS
bundles were designed to attract smaller
Users, including those with minimal
power or cabinet space demands or
those for which the costs attendant with
having a dedicated cabinet or greater
Type of service
Description
Amount of charge
Partial Cabinet Solution bundles Note: A User
and its Affiliates are limited to one Partial
Cabinet Solution bundle at a time. A User
and its Affiliates must have an Aggregate
Cabinet Footprint of 2 kW or less to qualify
for a Partial Cabinet Solution bundle. See
Note 2 under ‘‘General Notes.’’
Option A: 1 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN connection (1 Gb), 1 IP network connection (1
Gb), 2 fiber cross connections and either
the Network Time Protocol Feed or Precision Timing Protocol.
$7,500 initial charge per bundle plus monthly
charge per bundle as follows:
• For Users that order on or before December 31, 2020: $3,000 monthly for first 24
months of service, and $6,000 monthly
thereafter.
• For Users that order after December 31,
2020: $6,000 monthly.
$7,500 initial charge per bundle plus monthly
charge per bundle as follows:
• For Users that order on or before December 31, 2020: $3,500 monthly for first 24
months of service, and $7,000 monthly
thereafter.
• For Users that order after December 31,
2020: $7,000 monthly.
$10,000 initial charge per bundle plus monthly
charge per bundle as follows:
• For Users that order on or before December 31, 2020: $7,000 monthly for first 24
months of service, and $14,000 monthly
thereafter.
• For Users that order after December 31,
2020: $14,000 monthly.
$10,000 initial charge per bundle plus monthly
charge per bundle as follows:
• For Users that order on or before December 31, 2020: $7,500 monthly for first 24
months of service, and $15,000 monthly
thereafter.
• For Users that order after December 31,
2020: $15,000 monthly.
Option B: 2 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN connection (1 Gb), 1 IP network connection (1
Gb), 2 fiber cross connections and either
the Network Time Protocol Feed or Precision Timing Protocol.
Option C: 1 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN connection (10 Gb LX), 1 IP network connection (10 Gb), 2 fiber cross connections and
either the Network Time Protocol Feed or
Precision Timing Protocol.
Option D: 2 kW partial cabinet, 1 LCN connection (10 Gb LX), 1 IP network connection (10 Gb), 2 fiber cross connections and
either the Network Time Protocol Feed or
Precision Timing Protocol.
Application and Impact of the Proposed
Change
The proposed change would apply to
all PCS bundles. The proposed change
would not apply differently to distinct
types or sizes of market participants.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
network connection bandwidth are too
burdensome.7
The Exchange offers Users that
purchase a PCS bundle on or before
December 31, 2019 a 50% reduction in
the monthly recurring charges (‘‘MRC’’)
for the first 24 months.8 The Exchange
proposes to extend the 50% fee
reduction to those Users that purchase
a PCS bundle on or before December 31,
2020.9 The Exchange does not propose
to amend the length of the discount
period.
The amended portions of the Fee
Schedules would read as follows:
4 The Exchange initially filed rule changes
relating to its co-location services with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) in 2010. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 63275 (November 8, 2010), 75 FR
70048 (November 16, 2010) (SR–NYSEArca–2010–
100). The Exchange operates a data center in
Mahwah, New Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from
which it provides co-location services to Users.
5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
services, a ‘‘User’’ means any market participant
that requests to receive co-location services directly
from the Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
Rather, it would apply to all Users
equally.
Users that require other sizes or
combinations of cabinets, network
connections and cross connects could
still request them. As is currently the
case, the purchase of any colocation
service, including PCS bundles, is
completely voluntary and the Fee
Schedules are applied uniformly to all
Users.
Release No. 76010 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR
60197 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–82).
As specified in the Fee Schedules, a User that
incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location
service pursuant thereto would not be subject to colocation fees for the same co-location service
charged by the Exchange’s affiliates the New York
Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American LLC, NYSE
Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc. (collectively,
the ‘‘Affiliate SROs’’). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 70173 (August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50459
(August 19, 2013) (SR–NYSEArca–2013–80).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77070
(February 5, 2016), 81 FR 7401 (February 11, 2016)
(SR–NYSEArca–2015–102).
7 Id., at 7402.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84898
(December 20, 2018), 83 FR 67397 (December 28,
2019) (SR–NYSEArca–2018–93).
9 The Exchange previously extended the MRC
reduction for one year. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 82226 (December 6, 2017), 82 FR
58462 (December 12, 2017) (SR–NYSEArca–2017–
134); and 79716 (December 30, 2016), 82 FR 1774
(January 6, 2017) (SR–NYSEArca–2016–168).
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Notices
Competitive Environment
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
A User may host another entity in its
space within the data center. Such Users
are called ‘‘Hosting Users,’’ and their
customers are ‘‘Hosted Customers.’’ 10
Based on conversations with Users
and potential customers, the Exchange
believes that Hosting Users offer
bundles (‘‘Hosting User Bundles’’) that
include cabinet space and space on
shared LCN and IP network
connections—and that the Hosting User
Bundles provide their end users with a
service similar to that of the PCS
bundles, but with a lower cost and
latency.11
The Exchange believes that, by
extending the existing eligibility for a
50% MRC reduction for another year,
the proposed change may make PCS
bundles more competitive with the
services that Hosting Users offer.
Importantly, the proposed extension
would provide potential Users with a
wider range of choices for the period of
the extension, which would be
especially beneficial for potential Users
with minimal power or cabinet space
demands or those for which the costs
attendant with having a dedicated
cabinet or greater network connection
bandwidth are too burdensome.12
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which exchanges
and other vendors (i.e., Hosting Users)
offer co-location services as a means to
facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants
who believe that co-location enhances
the efficiency of their operations. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the
securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and recognized that current
regulation of the market system ‘‘has
been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
10 A Hosting User is required to be a User, but
because only Users can be Hosting Users, a Hosted
Customer is not able to provide hosting services to
any other entities in the space in which it is hosted.
The Exchange allows Users to act as Hosting Users
for a monthly fee. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 76010 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR
60197 (October 5, 2015) (SR–NYSEArca–2015–82).
11 Because Hosting Users’ services are not
regulated, they may offer differentiated pricing and
are not required to make their pricing public or
disclose it to the Exchange. The Exchange therefore
does not have direct visibility into the specific
range of options, or cost thereof, offered by Hosting
Users, and relies on third parties for information.
12 See supra note 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 13
General
As is the case with all Exchange colocation arrangements, (i) neither a User
nor any of the User’s customers would
be permitted to submit orders directly to
the Exchange unless such User or
customer is a member organization, a
Sponsored Participant or an agent
thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing
order entry services); (ii) use of the colocation services proposed herein would
be completely voluntary and available
to all Users on a non-discriminatory
basis; 14 and (iii) a User would only
incur one charge for the particular colocation service described herein,
regardless of whether the User connects
only to the Exchange or to the Exchange
and one or more of the Affiliate SROs.15
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,16 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,17 in particular, because it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,18 because it
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
14 As is currently the case, Users that receive colocation services from the Exchange will not receive
any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems that is separate from, or superior
to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems through the same order gateway,
regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the
data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do
not receive any market data or data service product
that is not available to all Users, although Users that
receive co-location services normally would expect
reduced latencies, as compared to Users that are not
co-located, in sending orders to, and receiving
market data from, the Exchange.
15 See 78 FR 50459, supra note 5, at 50459. Each
of the Affiliate SROs has submitted substantially
the same proposed rule change to propose the
changes described herein. See SR–NYSE–2019–72,
SR–NYSEAmer–2019–58, SR–NYSECHX–2019–27,
and SR–NYSENAT–2019–32.
16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72073
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members, issuers and other
persons using its facilities and does not
unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Proposed Change is Not Unfairly
Discriminatory
The Exchange believes its proposal is
not unfairly discriminatory.
The proposed change would not
apply differently to distinct types or
sizes of market participants. Rather, it
would apply to all Users equally. The
Exchange would continue to offer the
four different PCS bundles with
different cabinet footprints and network
connections options. Users that require
other sizes or combinations of cabinets,
network connections and cross connects
could still request them. As is currently
the case, the purchase of any colocation
service, including PCS bundles, would
be completely voluntary.
The proposed change would ensure
that all Users that order a bundle on or
before December 31, 2020 would have
their MRC reduced by 50% for the first
24 months. Extending the period would
make it more cost effective for current
or potential Users to utilize co-location
by offering a cost effective, convenient
way to create a colocation environment,
through the choice among PCS bundles
with different cabinet footprints and
network connections options. The
Exchange expects that such Users would
include those with minimal power or
cabinet space demands and Users for
which the costs attendant with having a
dedicated cabinet or greater network
connection bandwidth are too
burdensome.
The Proposed Change is Reasonable
The Exchange believes its proposal is
reasonable.
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable to extend the period of
eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction as
an incentive to Users to utilize PCS
bundles. Extending the existing
eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction for
another year would provide smaller
current or potential Users with minimal
power or cabinet space demands with
additional time to purchase a PCS
bundle at a discounted rate.
The Exchange believes that, by
extending the existing eligibility for a
50% MRC reduction for another year,
the proposed change may make PCS
bundles more competitive with the
services that Hosting Users offer. The
proposed extension would continue to
provide potential Users with a wider
range of choices for the period of the
extension.
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
72074
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Proposed Change is an Equitable
Allocation of Fees and Credits
The Exchange believes its proposal
equitably allocates its fees among its
market participants.
The proposed change would not
apply differently to distinct types or
sizes of market participants. Rather, it
would apply to all Users equally. The
Exchange would continue to offer the
four different PCS bundles with
different cabinet footprints and network
connections options. Users that require
other sizes or combinations of cabinets,
network connections and cross connects
could still request them. As is currently
the case, the purchase of any colocation
service, including PCS bundles, would
be completely voluntary.
Having the change apply to all PCS
bundles would ensure that all Users that
order a bundle on or before December
31, 2020 would have their MRC reduced
by 50% for the first 24 months.
Extending the period would make it
more cost effective for current or
potential Users to utilize co-location by
continuing to offer a cost effective,
convenient way to create a colocation
environment, through the choice among
PCS bundles with different cabinet
footprints and network connections
options. The Exchange expects that such
Users would include those with
minimal power or cabinet space
demands and Users for which the costs
attendant with having a dedicated
cabinet or greater network connection
bandwidth are too burdensome.
Without this proposed rule change,
potential Users choosing between a PCS
bundle and a Hosting User Bundle
would have fewer attractive options.
This would be a detriment for them,
especially for potential Users with
minimal power or cabinet space
demands or those for which the costs
attendant with having a dedicated
cabinet or greater network connection
bandwidth are too burdensome.19
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For the reasons above, the proposed
changes do not unfairly discriminate
between or among market participants
that are otherwise capable of satisfying
any applicable co-location fees,
requirements, terms and conditions
established from time to time by the
Exchange.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
19 See
supra note 7.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Dec 27, 2019
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule changes will not
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of Section
6(b)(8) of the Act.20
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed change would place any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate. The
proposed changes would enhance
competition by extending the period of
eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction to
all Users that order a bundle on or
before December 31, 2020. Such change
would make it more cost effective for
current or potential Users to utilize colocation by offering a cost effective,
convenient way to create a colocation
environment, through the choice among
PCS bundles with different cabinet
footprints and network connections
options. The Exchange believes that, by
extending the period of eligibility, the
proposed change may make PCS
bundles more attractive to potential
Users who might otherwise opt to
become Hosted Customers, and thus
enhance the competitive environment
for potential Users (who would then
have more options from which to
select).
Importantly, the proposed extension
would provide potential Users with a
wider range of choices for the period of
the extension, which would be
especially beneficial for potential Users
with minimal power or cabinet space
demands or those for which the costs
attendant with having a dedicated
cabinet or greater network connection
bandwidth are too burdensome. At the
same time, however, no potential User
would be obligated to purchase a PCS
bundle, and it would still have the
options offered by Hosting Users.
PCS bundles allow Users to select
their desired cabinet footprint and
network connections at a reduced MRC
for the first 24 months. Such Users may
choose, in turn, to pass on such cost
savings to their customers. In addition
to the proposed services being
completely voluntary, they are available
to all Users on an equal basis (i.e. the
same products and services are available
to all Users, and the extension of the
50% reduction for the MRC for the PCS
bundles, would apply to all Users).
Intermarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed fee would impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
20 15
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
Frm 00185
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
is not necessary or appropriate. The
proposed change is not meant to affect
competition among national securities
exchanges. Rather, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change is a
reasonable attempt to maintain a more
level playing field between the
Exchange and the Hosting Users, who
compete for Hosted Customer business.
Because Hosting Users’ services are not
regulated, they may offer differentiated
pricing and are not required to make
their pricing public. The Exchange
believes that the proposed change may
make PCS bundles more attractive to
potential Users who might otherwise
opt to become Hosted Customers.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which exchanges
offer co-location services as a means to
facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants
who believe that co-location enhances
the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for colocation services are constrained by the
active competition for the order flow of,
and other business from, such market
participants. If a particular exchange
charges excessive fees for co-location
services, affected market participants
will opt to terminate their co-location
arrangements with that exchange, and
adopt a possible range of alternative
strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate
location outside the exchange’s data
center (which could be a competing
exchange), or pursuing strategies less
dependent upon the lower exchange-toparticipant latency associated with colocation. Accordingly, the exchange
charging excessive fees would stand to
lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly colocated trading firms, which could have
additional follow-on effects on the
market share and revenue of the affected
exchange. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually review, and
consider adjusting, its services and
related fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges.
The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Notices
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 21
For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule changes reflect this competitive
environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 22 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–423
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 24 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2019–97 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2019–97. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2019–97 and
should be submitted on or before
January 21, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–28168 Filed 12–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87818; File No. SR–GEMX–
2019–17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Adopt a New Rule
Titled ‘‘Off-Exchange RWA Transfers’’
at GEMX Options 6, Section 6
72075
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
17, 2019, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
new rule titled ‘‘Off-Exchange RWA
Transfers’’ at GEMX Options 6, Section
6.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqgemx.cchwallstreet.com/,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt a
new rule titled, ‘‘Off-Exchange RWA
Transfers’’ at GEMX Options 6, Section
6. This proposal is substantially the
same as Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’)
Rule 6.8.3
Proposed Options 6, Section 6 is
intended to facilitate the reduction of
risk-weighted assets (‘‘RWA’’)
attributable to open options positions.
SEC Rule 15c3–1 (Net Capital
Requirements for Brokers or Dealers)
(‘‘Net Capital Rules’’) requires registered
broker-dealers, unless otherwise
December 20, 2019.
21 See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
24 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
25 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00186
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87374
(October 21, 2019), 84 FR 57542 (October 25, 2019)
(SR–Cboe–2019–044).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM
30DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72071-72075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-87839; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2019-97]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
Arca Options Fees and Charges and the NYSE Arca Equities Fees and
Charges To Extend for One Year a Fee Discount for the Partial Cabinet
Solution Bundles Offered in Connection With the Exchange's Co-location
Services
December 23, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on December 16, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fees and
Charges (the ``Options Fee Schedule'') and the NYSE Arca Equities Fees
and Charges (the ``Equities Fee Schedule'' and, together with the
Options Fee Schedule, the ``Fee Schedules'') to extend for one year a
fee discount for the Partial Cabinet Solution bundles offered in
connection with the Exchange's co-location services. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
[[Page 72072]]
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedules related to co-
location \4\ services to extend a fee discount for the Partial Cabinet
Solution (``PCS'') bundles that the Exchange offers Users.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange initially filed rule changes relating to its
co-location services with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') in 2010. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
63275 (November 8, 2010), 75 FR 70048 (November 16, 2010) (SR-
NYSEArca-2010-100). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah,
New Jersey (the ``data center'') from which it provides co-location
services to Users.
\5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, a
``User'' means any market participant that requests to receive co-
location services directly from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76010 (September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60197
(October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-82). As specified in the Fee
Schedules, a User that incurs co-location fees for a particular co-
location service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-
location fees for the same co-location service charged by the
Exchange's affiliates the New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE American
LLC, NYSE Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc. (collectively, the
``Affiliate SROs''). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70173
(August 13, 2013), 78 FR 50459 (August 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-
80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are four PCS bundles, each of which includes a partial
cabinet; access to the Liquidity Center Network (``LCN'') and internet
protocol (``IP'') network, the local area networks available in the
data center; two fiber cross connections; and connectivity to one of
two time feeds.\6\ The PCS bundles were designed to attract smaller
Users, including those with minimal power or cabinet space demands or
those for which the costs attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or
greater network connection bandwidth are too burdensome.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77070 (February 5,
2016), 81 FR 7401 (February 11, 2016) (SR-NYSEArca-2015-102).
\7\ Id., at 7402.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange offers Users that purchase a PCS bundle on or before
December 31, 2019 a 50% reduction in the monthly recurring charges
(``MRC'') for the first 24 months.\8\ The Exchange proposes to extend
the 50% fee reduction to those Users that purchase a PCS bundle on or
before December 31, 2020.\9\ The Exchange does not propose to amend the
length of the discount period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84898 (December 20,
2018), 83 FR 67397 (December 28, 2019) (SR-NYSEArca-2018-93).
\9\ The Exchange previously extended the MRC reduction for one
year. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 82226 (December 6,
2017), 82 FR 58462 (December 12, 2017) (SR-NYSEArca-2017-134); and
79716 (December 30, 2016), 82 FR 1774 (January 6, 2017) (SR-
NYSEArca-2016-168).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amended portions of the Fee Schedules would read as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of service Description Amount of charge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial Cabinet Solution bundles Option A: 1 kW $7,500 initial
Note: A User and its Affiliates partial cabinet, charge per bundle
are limited to one Partial 1 LCN connection plus monthly
Cabinet Solution bundle at a (1 Gb), 1 IP charge per bundle
time. A User and its Affiliates network as follows:
must have an Aggregate Cabinet connection (1 For Users
Footprint of 2 kW or less to Gb), 2 fiber that order on or
qualify for a Partial Cabinet cross connections before December
Solution bundle. See Note 2 and either the 31, 2020: $3,000
under ``General Notes.'' Network Time monthly for first
Protocol Feed or 24 months of
Precision Timing service, and
Protocol. $6,000 monthly
thereafter.
For Users
that order after
December 31,
2020: $6,000
monthly.
Option B: 2 kW $7,500 initial
partial cabinet, charge per bundle
1 LCN connection plus monthly
(1 Gb), 1 IP charge per bundle
network as follows:
connection (1 For Users
Gb), 2 fiber that order on or
cross connections before December
and either the 31, 2020: $3,500
Network Time monthly for first
Protocol Feed or 24 months of
Precision Timing service, and
Protocol. $7,000 monthly
thereafter.
For Users
that order after
December 31,
2020: $7,000
monthly.
Option C: 1 kW $10,000 initial
partial cabinet, charge per bundle
1 LCN connection plus monthly
(10 Gb LX), 1 IP charge per bundle
network as follows:
connection (10 For Users
Gb), 2 fiber that order on or
cross connections before December
and either the 31, 2020: $7,000
Network Time monthly for first
Protocol Feed or 24 months of
Precision Timing service, and
Protocol. $14,000 monthly
thereafter.
For Users
that order after
December 31,
2020: $14,000
monthly.
Option D: 2 kW $10,000 initial
partial cabinet, charge per bundle
1 LCN connection plus monthly
(10 Gb LX), 1 IP charge per bundle
network as follows:
connection (10 For Users
Gb), 2 fiber that order on or
cross connections before December
and either the 31, 2020: $7,500
Network Time monthly for first
Protocol Feed or 24 months of
Precision Timing service, and
Protocol. $15,000 monthly
thereafter.
For Users
that order after
December 31,
2020: $15,000
monthly.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Application and Impact of the Proposed Change
The proposed change would apply to all PCS bundles. The proposed
change would not apply differently to distinct types or sizes of market
participants. Rather, it would apply to all Users equally.
Users that require other sizes or combinations of cabinets, network
connections and cross connects could still request them. As is
currently the case, the purchase of any colocation service, including
PCS bundles, is completely voluntary and the Fee Schedules are applied
uniformly to all Users.
[[Page 72073]]
Competitive Environment
A User may host another entity in its space within the data center.
Such Users are called ``Hosting Users,'' and their customers are
``Hosted Customers.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A Hosting User is required to be a User, but because only
Users can be Hosting Users, a Hosted Customer is not able to provide
hosting services to any other entities in the space in which it is
hosted. The Exchange allows Users to act as Hosting Users for a
monthly fee. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76010
(September 29, 2015), 80 FR 60197 (October 5, 2015) (SR-NYSEArca-
2015-82).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on conversations with Users and potential customers, the
Exchange believes that Hosting Users offer bundles (``Hosting User
Bundles'') that include cabinet space and space on shared LCN and IP
network connections--and that the Hosting User Bundles provide their
end users with a service similar to that of the PCS bundles, but with a
lower cost and latency.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Because Hosting Users' services are not regulated, they may
offer differentiated pricing and are not required to make their
pricing public or disclose it to the Exchange. The Exchange
therefore does not have direct visibility into the specific range of
options, or cost thereof, offered by Hosting Users, and relies on
third parties for information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that, by extending the existing eligibility
for a 50% MRC reduction for another year, the proposed change may make
PCS bundles more competitive with the services that Hosting Users
offer. Importantly, the proposed extension would provide potential
Users with a wider range of choices for the period of the extension,
which would be especially beneficial for potential Users with minimal
power or cabinet space demands or those for which the costs attendant
with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth
are too burdensome.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
exchanges and other vendors (i.e., Hosting Users) offer co-location
services as a means to facilitate the trading and other market
activities of those market participants who believe that co-location
enhances the efficiency of their operations. The Commission has
repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the
securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and recognized that current regulation of the market
system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition
in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
General
As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i)
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is
a member organization, a Sponsored Participant or an agent thereof
(e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services); (ii) use of
the co-location services proposed herein would be completely voluntary
and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory basis; \14\ and
(iii) a User would only incur one charge for the particular co-location
service described herein, regardless of whether the User connects only
to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or more of the Affiliate
SROs.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from,
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location
services normally would expect reduced latencies, as compared to
Users that are not co-located, in sending orders to, and receiving
market data from, the Exchange.
\15\ See 78 FR 50459, supra note 5, at 50459. Each of the
Affiliate SROs has submitted substantially the same proposed rule
change to propose the changes described herein. See SR-NYSE-2019-72,
SR-NYSEAmer-2019-58, SR-NYSECHX-2019-27, and SR-NYSENAT-2019-32.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers,
or dealers. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\18\ because it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members, issuers and other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Change is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes its proposal is not unfairly discriminatory.
The proposed change would not apply differently to distinct types
or sizes of market participants. Rather, it would apply to all Users
equally. The Exchange would continue to offer the four different PCS
bundles with different cabinet footprints and network connections
options. Users that require other sizes or combinations of cabinets,
network connections and cross connects could still request them. As is
currently the case, the purchase of any colocation service, including
PCS bundles, would be completely voluntary.
The proposed change would ensure that all Users that order a bundle
on or before December 31, 2020 would have their MRC reduced by 50% for
the first 24 months. Extending the period would make it more cost
effective for current or potential Users to utilize co-location by
offering a cost effective, convenient way to create a colocation
environment, through the choice among PCS bundles with different
cabinet footprints and network connections options. The Exchange
expects that such Users would include those with minimal power or
cabinet space demands and Users for which the costs attendant with
having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth are
too burdensome.
The Proposed Change is Reasonable
The Exchange believes its proposal is reasonable.
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to extend the period of
eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction as an incentive to Users to utilize
PCS bundles. Extending the existing eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction
for another year would provide smaller current or potential Users with
minimal power or cabinet space demands with additional time to purchase
a PCS bundle at a discounted rate.
The Exchange believes that, by extending the existing eligibility
for a 50% MRC reduction for another year, the proposed change may make
PCS bundles more competitive with the services that Hosting Users
offer. The proposed extension would continue to provide potential Users
with a wider range of choices for the period of the extension.
[[Page 72074]]
The Proposed Change is an Equitable Allocation of Fees and Credits
The Exchange believes its proposal equitably allocates its fees
among its market participants.
The proposed change would not apply differently to distinct types
or sizes of market participants. Rather, it would apply to all Users
equally. The Exchange would continue to offer the four different PCS
bundles with different cabinet footprints and network connections
options. Users that require other sizes or combinations of cabinets,
network connections and cross connects could still request them. As is
currently the case, the purchase of any colocation service, including
PCS bundles, would be completely voluntary.
Having the change apply to all PCS bundles would ensure that all
Users that order a bundle on or before December 31, 2020 would have
their MRC reduced by 50% for the first 24 months. Extending the period
would make it more cost effective for current or potential Users to
utilize co-location by continuing to offer a cost effective, convenient
way to create a colocation environment, through the choice among PCS
bundles with different cabinet footprints and network connections
options. The Exchange expects that such Users would include those with
minimal power or cabinet space demands and Users for which the costs
attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection
bandwidth are too burdensome.
Without this proposed rule change, potential Users choosing between
a PCS bundle and a Hosting User Bundle would have fewer attractive
options. This would be a detriment for them, especially for potential
Users with minimal power or cabinet space demands or those for which
the costs attendant with having a dedicated cabinet or greater network
connection bandwidth are too burdensome.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For the reasons above, the proposed changes do not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule changes will not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change would place
any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate. The proposed changes would enhance competition by
extending the period of eligibility for a 50% MRC reduction to all
Users that order a bundle on or before December 31, 2020. Such change
would make it more cost effective for current or potential Users to
utilize co-location by offering a cost effective, convenient way to
create a colocation environment, through the choice among PCS bundles
with different cabinet footprints and network connections options. The
Exchange believes that, by extending the period of eligibility, the
proposed change may make PCS bundles more attractive to potential Users
who might otherwise opt to become Hosted Customers, and thus enhance
the competitive environment for potential Users (who would then have
more options from which to select).
Importantly, the proposed extension would provide potential Users
with a wider range of choices for the period of the extension, which
would be especially beneficial for potential Users with minimal power
or cabinet space demands or those for which the costs attendant with
having a dedicated cabinet or greater network connection bandwidth are
too burdensome. At the same time, however, no potential User would be
obligated to purchase a PCS bundle, and it would still have the options
offered by Hosting Users.
PCS bundles allow Users to select their desired cabinet footprint
and network connections at a reduced MRC for the first 24 months. Such
Users may choose, in turn, to pass on such cost savings to their
customers. In addition to the proposed services being completely
voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis (i.e. the
same products and services are available to all Users, and the
extension of the 50% reduction for the MRC for the PCS bundles, would
apply to all Users).
Intermarket Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed fee would impose
any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate. The proposed change is not meant to affect competition
among national securities exchanges. Rather, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change is a reasonable attempt to maintain a more level
playing field between the Exchange and the Hosting Users, who compete
for Hosted Customer business. Because Hosting Users' services are not
regulated, they may offer differentiated pricing and are not required
to make their pricing public. The Exchange believes that the proposed
change may make PCS bundles more attractive to potential Users who
might otherwise opt to become Hosted Customers.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
exchanges offer co-location services as a means to facilitate the
trading and other market activities of those market participants who
believe that co-location enhances the efficiency of their operations.
Accordingly, fees charged for co-location services are constrained by
the active competition for the order flow of, and other business from,
such market participants. If a particular exchange charges excessive
fees for co-location services, affected market participants will opt to
terminate their co-location arrangements with that exchange, and adopt
a possible range of alternative strategies, including placing their
servers in a physically proximate location outside the exchange's data
center (which could be a competing exchange), or pursuing strategies
less dependent upon the lower exchange-to-participant latency
associated with co-location. Accordingly, the exchange charging
excessive fees would stand to lose not only co-location revenues but
also the liquidity of the formerly co-located trading firms, which
could have additional follow-on effects on the market share and revenue
of the affected exchange. In such an environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider adjusting, its services and related
fees and credits to remain competitive with other exchanges.
The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its
[[Page 72075]]
broader forms that are most important to investors and listed
companies.'' \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule changes reflect this competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \22\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4\23\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \24\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2019-97 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2019-97. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2019-97 and should be submitted
on or before January 21, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-28168 Filed 12-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
