Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan: Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order, 70937-70941 [2019-27815]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Notices
any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
provide this certification and supporting
records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and/or the
Department of Commerce (Commerce);
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification
for the later of (1) a period of five years from
the date of entry or (2) a period of three years
after the conclusion of any litigation in
United States courts regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain and provide a copy of the exporter’s
certification and supporting records, upon
request, to CBP and/or Commerce;
• I understand that the claims made
herein, and the substantiating
documentation, are subject to verification by
CBP and/or Commerce;
• I understand that failure to maintain the
required certification and/or failure to
substantiate the claims made herein will
result in:
Æ Suspension of liquidation of all
unliquidated entries (and entries for which
liquidation has not become final) for which
these requirements were not met and
Æ the requirement that the importer post
applicable antidumping/countervailing duty
(AD and/or CVD) cash deposits equal to the
rates as determined by Commerce;
• I understand that agents of the importer,
such as brokers, are not permitted to make
this certification;
• This certification was completed at or
prior to the time of Entry; and
• I am aware that U.S. law (including, but
not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes
criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially
false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
lllllllllllllllllllll
Name of Company Official
lllllllllllllllllllll
Title
lllllllllllllllllllll
Date
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix IV
Exporter Certification
I hereby certify that:
• My name is {INSERT COMPANY
OFFICIAL’S NAME HERE} and I am an
official of {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING
COMPANY};
• I have direct personal knowledge of the
facts regarding the production and
exportation of the cold-rolled steel flat
products that were sold to the United States
under invoice number(s) INSERT INVOICE
NUMBER(S). ‘‘Direct personal knowledge’’
refers to facts the certifying party is expected
to have in its own books and records. For
example, an exporter should have ‘‘direct
personal knowledge’’ of the producer’s
identity and location.
• The {MERCHANDISE} covered by this
certification was produced by {NAME OF
PRODUCING COMPANY}, located at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
{ADDRESS OF PRODUCING COMPANY};
for each additional company, repeat: {NAME
OF PRODUCING COMPANY}, located at
{ADDRESS OF PRODUCING COMPANY}.
• These cold-rolled steel flat products
produced in Vietnam do not contain hotrolled steel substrate produced in Korea:
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain a copy of this certification and
sufficient documentation supporting this
certification (i.e., documents maintained in
the normal course of business, or documents
obtained by the certifying party, for example,
mill certificates, productions records,
invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of
five years from the date of entry or (2) a
period of three years after the conclusion of
any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide this
Exporter Certification to the U.S. importer by
the time of shipment;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to
provide a copy of this certification and
supporting records, upon request, to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or
the Department of Commerce (Commerce);
• I understand that the claims made
herein, and the substantiating documentation
are subject to verification by CBP and/or
Commerce;
• I understand that failure to maintain the
required certification and/or failure to
substantiate the claims made herein will
result in:
Æ Suspension of all unliquidated entries
(and entries for which liquidation has not
become final) for which these requirements
were not met and
Æ the requirement that the importer post
applicable antidumping/countervailing duty
(AD and/or CVD) cash deposits equal to the
rates as determined by Commerce;
• This certification was completed at or
prior to the time of shipment; and
• I am aware that U.S. law (including, but
not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes
criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially
false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
lllllllllllllllllllll
Name of Company Official
lllllllllllllllllllll
Title
lllllllllllllllllllll
Date
[FR Doc. 2019–27816 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70937
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–856]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel
Products From Taiwan: Affirmative
Final Determination of Circumvention
Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that imports of
certain corrosion-resistant steel
products (CORE), completed in the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam)
using carbon hot-rolled steel (HRS) and/
or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat products
manufactured in Taiwan, are
circumventing the antidumping duty
(AD) order on CORE from Taiwan.
DATES: Applicable December 26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shanah Lee or Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6386 and (202) 482–0189,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 11, 2019, Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination 1 of circumvention of the
Taiwan CORE Order.2 A summary of
events that occurred since Commerce
published the Preliminary
Determination, as well as a full
discussion of the issues raised by parties
for this final determination, may be
found in the IDM.3 The IDM is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from Taiwan: Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry on the
Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 32864 (July 10,
2019) (Preliminary Determination) and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final
Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India
and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
48390 (July 25, 2016) (Taiwan CORE Order).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for Anti-Circumvention Inquiry on
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from Taiwan,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (IDM).
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
70938
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Notices
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the IDM can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the IDM are identical in
content.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are certain flat-rolled steel products,
either clad, plated, or coated with
corrosion-resistant metals such as zinc,
aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickelor iron-based alloys, whether or not
corrugated or painted, varnished,
laminated, or coated with plastics or
other non-metallic substances in
addition to the metallic coating. For a
complete description of the scope of the
order, see the IDM.
Scope of the Anti-Circumvention
Inquiry
This anti-circumvention inquiry
covers CORE completed in Vietnam
from HRS and/or CRS substrate
manufactured in Taiwan and
subsequently exported from Vietnam to
the United States (merchandise under
consideration). This final ruling applies
to all shipments of merchandise under
consideration entered on or after the
date of the initiation of this inquiry.
Importers and exporters of CORE
produced in Vietnam using: (1) HRS
manufactured in Vietnam or third
countries, (2) CRS manufactured in
Vietnam using HRS produced in
Vietnam or third countries, or (3) CRS
manufactured in third countries, must
certify that the HRS and/or CRS
processed into CORE in Vietnam did not
originate in Taiwan, as provided for in
the certifications attached to the Federal
Register notice. Otherwise, their
merchandise may be subject to
antidumping duties.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this anticircumvention inquiry in accordance
with section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Because
Vietnam is a non-market economy,
within the meaning of section 771(18) of
the Act,4 Commerce calculated the
value of certain processing and
merchandise using factors of production
4 See, e.g., Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 81 FR 24797 (October 14, 2016) unchanged
in Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results
Antidumping Administrative Review; 2014–2015,
82 FR 18611 (April 20, 2017).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
and market economy values, as
discussed in section 773(c) of the Act.
See Preliminary Decision Memorandum
for a full description of the
methodology. We have continued to
apply this methodology for our final
determination.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties in this inquiry
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Based on our analysis of the
comments received and our findings at
verification, we made certain changes to
the value of further processing
calculation, value of input purchases
from Taiwan, and pattern of trade
analysis since the Preliminary
Determination. These changes are
discussed in the IDM. See the ‘‘Changes
since the Preliminary Determination’’
section.
Final Affirmative Determination of
Circumvention
We determine that exports to the
United States of CORE produced in
Vietnam from HRS or CRS substrate
manufactured in Taiwan are
circumventing the Taiwan CORE Order.
We therefore find it appropriate to
determine that this merchandise falls
within the Taiwan CORE Order, and to
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to continue to suspend
liquidation of any entries of CORE from
Vietnam produced using HRS or CRS
substrate manufactured in Taiwan.
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
As stated above, Commerce has made
an affirmative determination of
circumvention of the Taiwan CORE
Order by exports to the United States of
CORE produced in Vietnam using
Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate.
This circumvention finding applies to
CORE produced by any Vietnamese
company using Taiwan-origin HRS or
CRS substrate. In accordance with 19
CFR 351.225(1)(3), Commerce will
direct CBP to continue to suspend
liquidation and to require a cash deposit
of estimated duties on unliquidated
entries of CORE produced in Vietnam
using Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS
substrate that were entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after August 2, 2018,
the date of initiation of this anticircumvention inquiry.
The suspension of liquidation and
cash deposit instructions will remain in
effect until further notice. In order to
prevent evasion, and because the AD
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and countervailing duty (CVD) rates
established in China CORE
Circumvention Determination 5 are
higher than the rates established for
CORE from Korea and Taiwan, and the
rates established for CORE from Korea
are higher than the AD rate established
for CORE from Taiwan, Commerce will
instruct CBP to suspend liquidation and
collect cash deposits in the following
manner. In the situation where no
certification regarding the origin of the
substrate is maintained for an entry, and
AD/CVD orders from three countries
(China, Korea, or Taiwan) potentially
apply to that entry, Commerce will
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and
collect cash deposits at the AD rate
established for the China-wide entity
(199.43 percent) and the CVD rate
established for the China all-others rate
(39.05 percent) pursuant to the China
Core Circumvention Determination.6 In
the situation where a certification is
maintained for the AD/CVD orders on
CORE from China (stating that the
merchandise was not produced from
HRS and/or CRS from China), but no
other certification is maintained,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
suspend the entry and collect cash
deposits at the AD and CVD all-others
rates (i.e., 8.31 percent and 1.19 percent,
respectively) applicable to the AD/CVD
orders on CORE from Korea.7 In the
situation where a certification is
maintained for the AD order on CORE
from China (stating that the
merchandise was not produced from
HRS and/or CRS from China), and for
the AD order on CORE from Korea
(stating that the merchandise was not
produced from HRS and/or CRS from
Korea), but no other certification is
maintained, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and
collect cash deposits at the AD all5 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from the People’s Republic of China: Affirmative
Final Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders,
83 FR 23895 (May 23, 2018) (China CORE
Circumvention Determination).
6 Id.
7 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Flat
Products from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of
China, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan:
Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty
Determination for India and Taiwan, and
Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016). The ‘‘all-others rate’’ was subsequently
amended as the result to litigation. See Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Determination of Investigation
and Notice of Amended Final Results, 83 FR 39054
(August 8, 2018); see also Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Republic
of Korea, and the People’s Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25,
2016) (collectively, Korea CORE Orders).
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Notices
others rate (i.e., 3.66 percent) applicable
to the AD order on CORE from Taiwan.
CORE produced in Vietnam from HRS
or CRS substrate that is not of Taiwanorigin is not subject to this inquiry.
Therefore, cash deposits are not
required for such merchandise.
However, CORE produced in Vietnam
from HRS and/or CRS from China is
subject to the AD/CVD orders on CORE
from China, and CORE produced in
Vietnam from HRS and/or CRS from
Korea is subject to the AD order on
CORE from Korea. If an importer
imports CORE from Vietnam and claims
that the CORE was produced from nonTaiwanese HRS or CRS substrate, in
order not to be subject to cash deposit
requirements, the importer and exporter
are required to meet the certification
and documentation requirements
described in Appendix II. Exporters of
CORE produced in Vietnam from nonTaiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate
must prepare and maintain an Exporter
Certification and documentation
supporting the Exporter Certification
(see Appendix IV). In addition,
importers of such CORE must prepare
and maintain an Importer Certification
(see Appendix III) as well as
documentation supporting the Importer
Certification. In addition to the Importer
Certification, the importer must also
maintain a copy of the Exporter
Certification (see Appendix IV) and
relevant supporting documentation from
its exporter of CORE produced from
non-Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS
substrate.
For this final determination, we
determine that the following companies
are not eligible for the certification
process: 190 Steel Pipe Co. Ltd.; Chinh
Dai Steel Limited; Hoa Phat Steel Pipe;
Perstima Viet Nam; Prima Commodities
Co.; Thong Nhat Flat Steel; Trung
Nguyen Steel Co.; Vietnam Germany
Steel JSC; Vietnam Steel Corp.; Thai
Nguyen Iron and Steel Corp.; Vina
Kyoei Steel Ltd.; and Vietnam Steel
Pipe. Accordingly, importers of CORE
from Vietnam produced and/or exported
by these ineligible companies are
similarly ineligible for the certification
process with regard to those imports.
Additionally, exporters are not eligible
to certify shipments of merchandise
produced by the above-listed
companies. Accordingly, Hoa Phat
Group Joint Stock Company and Hoa
Phat Steel Sheet are not eligible to
certify shipments of CORE produced by
Hoa Phat Steel Pipe.8
8 See
IDM at Comment 9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice will serve as the only
reminder to all parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and
published in accordance with section
781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f).
Dated: December 13, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance .
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
V. Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
VI. Statutory Framework
VII. Statutory Analysis
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Companies That Did
Not Receive Commerce’s Quantity and
Value (Q&V) Questionnaire Should Be
Permitted to Participate in the
Certification Process
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Abused
Its Discretion in Rejecting the Q&V
Questionnaire Responses of Certain
Companies
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Lacks
Statutory Authority to Apply AFA
Where Respondents Did Not Deprive
Commerce of Information Regarding Its
Ability To Trace Inputs
Comment 4: Whether Commerce’s Use of
AFA Impermissibly Departs Without
Explanation from Its Decision in the
China Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
Comment 5: Whether Precluding Certain
Importers and Exporters from
Participating in the Certification Process
is Inappropriate and Unfairly Punishes
Importers
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should
Allow Additional Time for Completing
Certification for Pre-Preliminary
Determination Entries
Comment 7: Whether a Country-Wide
Determination is Justified
Comment 8: Whether Commerce’s
Interpretation of Section 781(b) of the
Act Applies to the CORE Production
Process in Vietnam and Expands the
Scope of the Taiwan CORE Order
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70939
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should
Amend the Exporter Certification
Language to Prevent Funneling
Comment 10: Whether to Apply AFA to
Certain Vietnamese Producers that are
Affiliated with Those that are Deemed
Non-Responsive
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should
Preclude Companies that Failed to
Cooperate in Both the CORE from China
and CORE from Taiwan Inquiries from
Participating in the Certification Regime
Comment 12: Whether to Apply the
Highest of the Petition Rate or
Investigation Calculated Rate as the Cash
Deposit Rate for Non-Responsive
Companies
Comment 13: Whether CSVC’s
Manufacturing Operations in Vietnam
Constitute Circumvention Under the
Statutory Criteria Established in Section
781(b)(2) of the Act
Comment 14: Whether Nam Kim Should
Be Eligible for Certification
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II
Certification Requirements
If an importer imports certain corrosionresistant steel products (CORE) from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) and
claims that the CORE was not produced from
hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel
substrate (substrate) manufactured in
Taiwan, the importer is required to complete
and maintain the importer certification
attached hereto as Appendix III and all
supporting documentation. Where the
importer uses a broker to facilitate the entry
process, it should obtain the entry number
from the broker. Agents of the importer, such
as brokers, however, are not permitted to
make this certification on behalf of the
importer.
The exporter is required to complete and
maintain the exporter certification, attached
as Appendix IV, and is further required to
provide the importer a copy of that
certification and all supporting
documentation.
As discussed in the Issues and Decisions
Memorandum, for this final determination,
we are extending the period for completing
certifications for shipments and/or entries
during the August 2, 2018 through July 18,
2019 period established in the Preliminary
Determination. Accordingly, for shipments
and/or entries on or after August 2, 2018
through July 18, 2019 for which certifications
are required, importers and exporters should
complete the required certification within 30
days of the publication of this final
determination notice in the Federal Register.
For companies that were not eligible to
certify pursuant to the Preliminary
Determination, but are now eligible pursuant
to the final determination, we are also
extending the period for completion of their
certifications for shipments and/or entries
from August 2, 2018 through the date of
Federal Register publication of the final
determination until 30 days after publication
of this determination.
Accordingly, where appropriate, the
relevant bullet in the certification should be
edited to reflect that the certification was
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
70940
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Notices
completed within the time frame specified
above. For example, the bullet in the
importer certification that reads: ‘‘This
certification was completed at or prior to the
time of Entry,’’ could be edited as follows:
‘‘The imports referenced herein entered
before July 19, 2019. This certification was
completed on mm/dd/yyyy, within 30 days
of the Federal Register notice publication of
the final determination of circumvention.’’
Similarly, the bullet in the exporter
certification that reads, ‘‘This certification
was completed at or prior to the time of
shipment,’’ could be edited as follows: ‘‘The
shipments/products referenced herein
shipped before July 19, 2019. This
certification was completed on mm/dd/yyyy,
within 30 days of the Federal Register notice
publication of the final determination of
circumvention.’’ For such entries/shipments,
importers and exporters each have the option
to complete a blanket certification covering
multiple entries/shipments, individual
certifications for each entry/shipment, or a
combination thereof.
For shipments and/or entries on or after
the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, for which certifications are
required, importers should complete the
required certification at or prior to the date
of Entry and exporters should complete the
required certification and provide it to the
importer at or prior to the date of shipment.
For shipments and/or entries made on or
after 10 days after the date of publication of
this final determination, exporters should use
the certification contained below that
incorporates additional information that was
not in the preliminary determination
certification. Specifically, the certification
now requires identification of the producer of
the merchandise being exported to the
United States. The importer and Vietnamese
exporter are also required to maintain
sufficient documentation supporting their
certifications. The importer will not be
required to submit the certifications or
supporting documentation to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) as part of the
entry process at this time. However, the
importer and the exporter will be required to
present the certifications and supporting
documentation, to Commerce and/or CBP, as
applicable, upon request by the respective
agency. Additionally, the claims made in the
certifications and any supporting
documentation are subject to verification by
Commerce and/or CBP. The importer and
exporter are required to maintain the
certifications and supporting documentation
for the later of (1) a period of five years from
the date of entry or (2) a period of three years
after the conclusion of any litigation in
United States courts regarding such entries.
In the situation where no certification is
maintained for an entry, and AD/CVD orders
from three countries (China, Korea, or
Taiwan) potentially apply to that entry,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
suspend the entry and collect cash deposits
at the CORE China Circumvention Final rates
(i.e., the AD rate established for the Chinawide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD
rate established for China all-others rate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
(39.05 percent)).9 In the situation where a
certification is maintained for the AD/CVD
orders on CORE from China (stating that the
merchandise was not produced from HRS
and/or CRS from China), but no other
certification is maintained, then Commerce
intends to instruct CBP to suspend the entry
and collect cash deposits at the AD and CVD
all-others rates (i.e., 8.31 percent and 1.19
percent, respectively) applicable to the AD/
CVD orders on CORE from Korea. In the
situation where a certification is maintained
for the AD order on CORE from China
(stating that the merchandise was not
produced from HRS and/or CRS from China),
and for the AD order on CORE from Korea
(stating that the merchandise was not
produced from HRS and/or CRS from Korea),
but no other certification is maintained,
Commerce intends to instruct CBP to
suspend the entry and collect cash deposits
at the AD all-others rate (i.e., 3.66 percent)
applicable to the AD order on CORE from
Taiwan.
Appendix III
Importer Certification
I hereby certify that:
• My name is {INSERT COMPANY
OFFICIAL’S NAME HERE} and I am an
official of {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING
COMPANY};
• I have direct personal knowledge of the
facts regarding the importation into the
Customs territory of the United States of the
corrosion-resistant steel products produced
in Vietnam that entered under entry
number(s) {INSERT ENTRY NUMBER(S)}
and are covered by this certification. ‘‘Direct
personal knowledge’’ refers to facts the
certifying party is expected to have in its own
records. For example, the importer should
have ‘‘direct personal knowledge’’ of the
importation of the product (e.g., the name of
the exporter) in its records;
• I have personal knowledge of the facts
regarding the production of the imported
products covered by this certification.
‘‘Personal knowledge’’ includes facts
obtained from another party, (e.g.,
correspondence received by the importer (or
exporter) from the producer regarding the
source of the input used to produce the
imported products);
• These corrosion-resistant steel products
produced in Vietnam do not contain hotrolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate
produced in Taiwan:
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain a copy of this certification and
sufficient documentation supporting this
certification (i.e., documents maintained in
the normal course of business, or documents
obtained by the certifying party, for example,
mill certificates, productions records,
invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of
five years from the date of entry or (2) a
period of three years after the conclusion of
any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
9 See CORE China Circumvention Final, 83 FR at
23896.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide this certification and supporting
records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and/or the
Department of Commerce (Commerce);
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain a copy of the exporter’s certification
for the later of (1) a period of five years from
the date of entry or (2) a period of three years
after the conclusion of any litigation in
United States courts regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
IMPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain and provide a copy of the exporter’s
certification and supporting records, upon
request, to CBP and/or Commerce;
• I understand that the claims made
herein, and the substantiating
documentation, are subject to verification by
CBP and/or Commerce;
• I understand that failure to maintain the
required certification and/or failure to
substantiate the claims made herein will
result in:
Æ Suspension of liquidation of all
unliquidated entries (and entries for which
liquidation has not become final) for which
these requirements were not met and
Æ the requirement that the importer post
applicable antidumping duty (AD) cash
deposits equal to the rates as determined by
Commerce;
• I understand that agents of the importer,
such as brokers, are not permitted to make
this certification;
• This certification was completed at or
prior to the time of Entry; and
• I am aware that U.S. law (including, but
not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes
criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially
false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
lllllllllllllllllllll
Name of Company Official
lllllllllllllllllllll
Title
lllllllllllllllllllll
Date
Appendix IV
Exporter Certification
I hereby certify that:
• My name is {INSERT COMPANY
OFFICIAL’S NAME HERE} and I am an
official of {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING
COMPANY};
• I have direct personal knowledge of the
facts regarding the production and
exportation of the corrosion-resistant steel
products that were sold to the United States
under invoice number(s) INSERT INVOICE
NUMBER(S). ‘‘Direct personal knowledge’’
refers to facts the certifying party is expected
to have in its own books and records. For
example, an exporter should have ‘‘direct
personal knowledge’’ of the producer’s
identity and location.
• The {MERCHANDISE} covered this
certification was produced by {NAME OF
PRODUCING COMPANY}, located at
{ADDRESS OF PRODUCING COMPANY};
for each additional company, repeat: {NAME
OF PRODUCING COMPANY}, located at
{ADDRESS OF PRODUCING COMPANY}.
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Notices
• These corrosion-resistant steel products
produced in Vietnam do not contain hotrolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel substrate
produced in Taiwan:
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to
maintain a copy of this certification and
sufficient documentation supporting this
certification (i.e., documents maintained in
the normal course of business, or documents
obtained by the certifying party, for example,
mill certificates, productions records,
invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period of
five years from the date of entry or (2) a
period of three years after the conclusion of
any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} must provide this
Exporter Certification to the U.S. importer by
the time of shipment;
• I understand that {INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTING COMPANY} is required to
provide a copy of this certification and
supporting records, upon request, to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and/or
the Department of Commerce (Commerce);
• I understand that the claims made
herein, and the substantiating documentation
are subject to verification by CBP and/or
Commerce;
• I understand that failure to maintain the
required certification and/or failure to
substantiate the claims made herein will
result in:
Æ Suspension of all unliquidated entries
(and entries for which liquidation has not
become final) for which these requirements
were not met and
Æ the requirement that the importer post
applicable antidumping duty (AD) cash
deposits equal to the rates as determined by
Commerce;
• This certification was completed at or
prior to the time of shipment;
• I am aware that U.S. law (including, but
not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes
criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially
false statements to the U.S. government.
Signature
lllllllllllllllllllll
Name of Company Official
lllllllllllllllllllll
Title
[FR Doc. 2019–27815 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
[A–523–813, A–580–903]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet
From the Republic of Korea and the
Sultanate of Oman: Postponement of
Preliminary Determinations in the
Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable December 26, 2019.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita at (202) 482–4243 or
Katherine Sliney at (202) 482–2437
(Republic of Korea (Korea)); Matthew
Renkey at (202) 482–2312 or Javier
Barrientos at (202) 482–2243 (Sultanate
of Oman (Oman)), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 19, 2019, the Department
of Commerce (Commerce) initiated lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigations of
imports of polyethylene terephthalate
sheet from Korea and Oman.1 Currently,
the preliminary determinations are due
no later than January 6, 2020.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
Commerce to issue the preliminary
determination in an LTFV investigation
within 140 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation.
However, section 733(c)(1) of the Act
permits Commerce to postpone the
preliminary determination until no later
than 190 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation if:
(A) the petitioner makes a timely
request for a postponement; or (B)
Commerce concludes that the parties
concerned are cooperating, that the
investigation is extraordinarily
complicated, and that additional time is
necessary to make a preliminary
determination. Under 19 CFR
351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a
request for postponement 25 days or
more before the scheduled date of the
preliminary determination and must
state the reasons for the request.
Commerce will grant the request unless
it finds compelling reasons to deny the
request.2
On December 3, 2019, the petitioners 3
submitted a timely request that
Commerce postpone the preliminary
determinations in these LTFV
investigations.4 The petitioners stated
that a postponement is necessary to
1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Sheet from the
Republic of Korea, Mexico, and the Sultanate of
Oman: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 84 FR 44854 (August 27, 2019).
2 See 19 CFR 351.205(e).
3 The petitioners are Advanced Extrusion Inc., ExTech Plastics, Inc., and Multi-Plastics Extrusions,
Inc. (collectively, the petitioners).
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene
Terephthalate Sheet from Oman and Korea—
Petitioners’ Request to Postpone Preliminary
Determinations,’’ dated December 3, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70941
provide Commerce with adequate time
to solicit additional information from
the respondents, to review
supplemental questionnaire responses,
and to consider petitioners’ particular
market situation allegation.5
For the reasons stated above and
because there are no compelling reasons
to deny the request, Commerce, in
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of
the Act, is postponing the deadline for
the preliminary determinations by 50
days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
which these investigations were
initiated). As a result, Commerce will
issue its preliminary determinations no
later than February 25, 2020. In
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the
deadline for the final determinations of
these investigations will continue to be
75 days after the date of the preliminary
determinations, unless postponed at a
later date.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: December 17, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–27694 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Advisory Committee on Supply Chain
Competitiveness Charter Renewal
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Chief Financial Officer
and Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the General Services Administration,
renewed the Charter for the Advisory
Committee on Supply Chain
Competitiveness on November 14, 2019.
DATES: The Charter for the Advisory
Committee on Supply Chain
Competitiveness was renewed on
November 14, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Boll, Supply Chain Team,
Room 11014, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; phone
202–482–1135; email: richard.boll@
trade.gov.
SUMMARY:
5 Id.
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70937-70941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27815]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-856]
Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From Taiwan:
Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention Inquiry on the
Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports
of certain corrosion-resistant steel products (CORE), completed in the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) using carbon hot-rolled steel
(HRS) and/or cold-rolled steel (CRS) flat products manufactured in
Taiwan, are circumventing the antidumping duty (AD) order on CORE from
Taiwan.
DATES: Applicable December 26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanah Lee or Peter Zukowski, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6386 and (202) 482-0189,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 11, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Determination
\1\ of circumvention of the Taiwan CORE Order.\2\ A summary of events
that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Determination,
as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for this
final determination, may be found in the IDM.\3\ The IDM is a public
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://
[[Page 70938]]
access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the IDM can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the electronic versions of
the IDM are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan:
Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
on the Antidumping Duty Order, 84 FR 32864 (July 10, 2019)
(Preliminary Determination) and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
\2\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India,
Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea and
Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination for
India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 25,
2016) (Taiwan CORE Order).
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for Anti-
Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan,'' dated concurrently
with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (IDM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are certain flat-rolled steel
products, either clad, plated, or coated with corrosion-resistant
metals such as zinc, aluminum, or zinc-, aluminum-, nickel- or iron-
based alloys, whether or not corrugated or painted, varnished,
laminated, or coated with plastics or other non-metallic substances in
addition to the metallic coating. For a complete description of the
scope of the order, see the IDM.
Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
This anti-circumvention inquiry covers CORE completed in Vietnam
from HRS and/or CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan and subsequently
exported from Vietnam to the United States (merchandise under
consideration). This final ruling applies to all shipments of
merchandise under consideration entered on or after the date of the
initiation of this inquiry. Importers and exporters of CORE produced in
Vietnam using: (1) HRS manufactured in Vietnam or third countries, (2)
CRS manufactured in Vietnam using HRS produced in Vietnam or third
countries, or (3) CRS manufactured in third countries, must certify
that the HRS and/or CRS processed into CORE in Vietnam did not
originate in Taiwan, as provided for in the certifications attached to
the Federal Register notice. Otherwise, their merchandise may be
subject to antidumping duties.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this anti-circumvention inquiry in
accordance with section 781(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Because Vietnam is a non-market economy, within the meaning
of section 771(18) of the Act,\4\ Commerce calculated the value of
certain processing and merchandise using factors of production and
market economy values, as discussed in section 773(c) of the Act. See
Preliminary Decision Memorandum for a full description of the
methodology. We have continued to apply this methodology for our final
determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See, e.g., Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 81 FR 24797 (October 14, 2016) unchanged
in Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Final Results Antidumping Administrative Review; 2014-2015,
82 FR 18611 (April 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this inquiry are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at
verification, we made certain changes to the value of further
processing calculation, value of input purchases from Taiwan, and
pattern of trade analysis since the Preliminary Determination. These
changes are discussed in the IDM. See the ``Changes since the
Preliminary Determination'' section.
Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention
We determine that exports to the United States of CORE produced in
Vietnam from HRS or CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan are
circumventing the Taiwan CORE Order. We therefore find it appropriate
to determine that this merchandise falls within the Taiwan CORE Order,
and to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to
suspend liquidation of any entries of CORE from Vietnam produced using
HRS or CRS substrate manufactured in Taiwan.
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
As stated above, Commerce has made an affirmative determination of
circumvention of the Taiwan CORE Order by exports to the United States
of CORE produced in Vietnam using Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate.
This circumvention finding applies to CORE produced by any Vietnamese
company using Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate. In accordance with 19
CFR 351.225(1)(3), Commerce will direct CBP to continue to suspend
liquidation and to require a cash deposit of estimated duties on
unliquidated entries of CORE produced in Vietnam using Taiwan-origin
HRS or CRS substrate that were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after August 2, 2018, the date of initiation of
this anti-circumvention inquiry.
The suspension of liquidation and cash deposit instructions will
remain in effect until further notice. In order to prevent evasion, and
because the AD and countervailing duty (CVD) rates established in China
CORE Circumvention Determination \5\ are higher than the rates
established for CORE from Korea and Taiwan, and the rates established
for CORE from Korea are higher than the AD rate established for CORE
from Taiwan, Commerce will instruct CBP to suspend liquidation and
collect cash deposits in the following manner. In the situation where
no certification regarding the origin of the substrate is maintained
for an entry, and AD/CVD orders from three countries (China, Korea, or
Taiwan) potentially apply to that entry, Commerce will instruct CBP to
suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the AD rate established
for the China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate established
for the China all-others rate (39.05 percent) pursuant to the China
Core Circumvention Determination.\6\ In the situation where a
certification is maintained for the AD/CVD orders on CORE from China
(stating that the merchandise was not produced from HRS and/or CRS from
China), but no other certification is maintained, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the AD
and CVD all-others rates (i.e., 8.31 percent and 1.19 percent,
respectively) applicable to the AD/CVD orders on CORE from Korea.\7\ In
the situation where a certification is maintained for the AD order on
CORE from China (stating that the merchandise was not produced from HRS
and/or CRS from China), and for the AD order on CORE from Korea
(stating that the merchandise was not produced from HRS and/or CRS from
Korea), but no other certification is maintained, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the AD
all-
[[Page 70939]]
others rate (i.e., 3.66 percent) applicable to the AD order on CORE
from Taiwan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from the
People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty
Orders, 83 FR 23895 (May 23, 2018) (China CORE Circumvention
Determination).
\6\ Id.
\7\ See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Flat Products from
India, Italy, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Korea,
and Taiwan: Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
for India and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July
25, 2016). The ``all-others rate'' was subsequently amended as the
result to litigation. See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
with Final Determination of Investigation and Notice of Amended
Final Results, 83 FR 39054 (August 8, 2018); see also Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from India, Italy, Republic of
Korea, and the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty
Order, 81 FR 48387 (July 25, 2016) (collectively, Korea CORE
Orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORE produced in Vietnam from HRS or CRS substrate that is not of
Taiwan-origin is not subject to this inquiry. Therefore, cash deposits
are not required for such merchandise. However, CORE produced in
Vietnam from HRS and/or CRS from China is subject to the AD/CVD orders
on CORE from China, and CORE produced in Vietnam from HRS and/or CRS
from Korea is subject to the AD order on CORE from Korea. If an
importer imports CORE from Vietnam and claims that the CORE was
produced from non-Taiwanese HRS or CRS substrate, in order not to be
subject to cash deposit requirements, the importer and exporter are
required to meet the certification and documentation requirements
described in Appendix II. Exporters of CORE produced in Vietnam from
non-Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate must prepare and maintain an
Exporter Certification and documentation supporting the Exporter
Certification (see Appendix IV). In addition, importers of such CORE
must prepare and maintain an Importer Certification (see Appendix III)
as well as documentation supporting the Importer Certification. In
addition to the Importer Certification, the importer must also maintain
a copy of the Exporter Certification (see Appendix IV) and relevant
supporting documentation from its exporter of CORE produced from non-
Taiwan-origin HRS or CRS substrate.
For this final determination, we determine that the following
companies are not eligible for the certification process: 190 Steel
Pipe Co. Ltd.; Chinh Dai Steel Limited; Hoa Phat Steel Pipe; Perstima
Viet Nam; Prima Commodities Co.; Thong Nhat Flat Steel; Trung Nguyen
Steel Co.; Vietnam Germany Steel JSC; Vietnam Steel Corp.; Thai Nguyen
Iron and Steel Corp.; Vina Kyoei Steel Ltd.; and Vietnam Steel Pipe.
Accordingly, importers of CORE from Vietnam produced and/or exported by
these ineligible companies are similarly ineligible for the
certification process with regard to those imports. Additionally,
exporters are not eligible to certify shipments of merchandise produced
by the above-listed companies. Accordingly, Hoa Phat Group Joint Stock
Company and Hoa Phat Steel Sheet are not eligible to certify shipments
of CORE produced by Hoa Phat Steel Pipe.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See IDM at Comment 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice will serve as the only reminder to all parties subject
to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This determination is issued and published in accordance with
section 781(b) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.225(f).
Dated: December 13, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance .
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Scope of the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
V. Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
VI. Statutory Framework
VII. Statutory Analysis
VIII. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Companies That Did Not Receive Commerce's
Quantity and Value (Q&V) Questionnaire Should Be Permitted to
Participate in the Certification Process
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Abused Its Discretion in Rejecting
the Q&V Questionnaire Responses of Certain Companies
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Lacks Statutory Authority to Apply
AFA Where Respondents Did Not Deprive Commerce of Information
Regarding Its Ability To Trace Inputs
Comment 4: Whether Commerce's Use of AFA Impermissibly Departs
Without Explanation from Its Decision in the China Anti-
Circumvention Inquiry
Comment 5: Whether Precluding Certain Importers and Exporters
from Participating in the Certification Process is Inappropriate and
Unfairly Punishes Importers
Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should Allow Additional Time for
Completing Certification for Pre-Preliminary Determination Entries
Comment 7: Whether a Country-Wide Determination is Justified
Comment 8: Whether Commerce's Interpretation of Section 781(b)
of the Act Applies to the CORE Production Process in Vietnam and
Expands the Scope of the Taiwan CORE Order
Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should Amend the Exporter
Certification Language to Prevent Funneling
Comment 10: Whether to Apply AFA to Certain Vietnamese Producers
that are Affiliated with Those that are Deemed Non-Responsive
Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should Preclude Companies that
Failed to Cooperate in Both the CORE from China and CORE from Taiwan
Inquiries from Participating in the Certification Regime
Comment 12: Whether to Apply the Highest of the Petition Rate or
Investigation Calculated Rate as the Cash Deposit Rate for Non-
Responsive Companies
Comment 13: Whether CSVC's Manufacturing Operations in Vietnam
Constitute Circumvention Under the Statutory Criteria Established in
Section 781(b)(2) of the Act
Comment 14: Whether Nam Kim Should Be Eligible for Certification
IX. Recommendation
Appendix II
Certification Requirements
If an importer imports certain corrosion-resistant steel
products (CORE) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) and
claims that the CORE was not produced from hot-rolled steel and/or
cold-rolled steel substrate (substrate) manufactured in Taiwan, the
importer is required to complete and maintain the importer
certification attached hereto as Appendix III and all supporting
documentation. Where the importer uses a broker to facilitate the
entry process, it should obtain the entry number from the broker.
Agents of the importer, such as brokers, however, are not permitted
to make this certification on behalf of the importer.
The exporter is required to complete and maintain the exporter
certification, attached as Appendix IV, and is further required to
provide the importer a copy of that certification and all supporting
documentation.
As discussed in the Issues and Decisions Memorandum, for this
final determination, we are extending the period for completing
certifications for shipments and/or entries during the August 2,
2018 through July 18, 2019 period established in the Preliminary
Determination. Accordingly, for shipments and/or entries on or after
August 2, 2018 through July 18, 2019 for which certifications are
required, importers and exporters should complete the required
certification within 30 days of the publication of this final
determination notice in the Federal Register.
For companies that were not eligible to certify pursuant to the
Preliminary Determination, but are now eligible pursuant to the
final determination, we are also extending the period for completion
of their certifications for shipments and/or entries from August 2,
2018 through the date of Federal Register publication of the final
determination until 30 days after publication of this determination.
Accordingly, where appropriate, the relevant bullet in the
certification should be edited to reflect that the certification was
[[Page 70940]]
completed within the time frame specified above. For example, the
bullet in the importer certification that reads: ``This
certification was completed at or prior to the time of Entry,''
could be edited as follows: ``The imports referenced herein entered
before July 19, 2019. This certification was completed on mm/dd/
yyyy, within 30 days of the Federal Register notice publication of
the final determination of circumvention.'' Similarly, the bullet in
the exporter certification that reads, ``This certification was
completed at or prior to the time of shipment,'' could be edited as
follows: ``The shipments/products referenced herein shipped before
July 19, 2019. This certification was completed on mm/dd/yyyy,
within 30 days of the Federal Register notice publication of the
final determination of circumvention.'' For such entries/shipments,
importers and exporters each have the option to complete a blanket
certification covering multiple entries/shipments, individual
certifications for each entry/shipment, or a combination thereof.
For shipments and/or entries on or after the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register, for which certifications are
required, importers should complete the required certification at or
prior to the date of Entry and exporters should complete the
required certification and provide it to the importer at or prior to
the date of shipment.
For shipments and/or entries made on or after 10 days after the
date of publication of this final determination, exporters should
use the certification contained below that incorporates additional
information that was not in the preliminary determination
certification. Specifically, the certification now requires
identification of the producer of the merchandise being exported to
the United States. The importer and Vietnamese exporter are also
required to maintain sufficient documentation supporting their
certifications. The importer will not be required to submit the
certifications or supporting documentation to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) as part of the entry process at this time.
However, the importer and the exporter will be required to present
the certifications and supporting documentation, to Commerce and/or
CBP, as applicable, upon request by the respective agency.
Additionally, the claims made in the certifications and any
supporting documentation are subject to verification by Commerce
and/or CBP. The importer and exporter are required to maintain the
certifications and supporting documentation for the later of (1) a
period of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three
years after the conclusion of any litigation in United States courts
regarding such entries.
In the situation where no certification is maintained for an
entry, and AD/CVD orders from three countries (China, Korea, or
Taiwan) potentially apply to that entry, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the
CORE China Circumvention Final rates (i.e., the AD rate established
for the China-wide entity (199.43 percent) and the CVD rate
established for China all-others rate (39.05 percent)).\9\ In the
situation where a certification is maintained for the AD/CVD orders
on CORE from China (stating that the merchandise was not produced
from HRS and/or CRS from China), but no other certification is
maintained, then Commerce intends to instruct CBP to suspend the
entry and collect cash deposits at the AD and CVD all-others rates
(i.e., 8.31 percent and 1.19 percent, respectively) applicable to
the AD/CVD orders on CORE from Korea. In the situation where a
certification is maintained for the AD order on CORE from China
(stating that the merchandise was not produced from HRS and/or CRS
from China), and for the AD order on CORE from Korea (stating that
the merchandise was not produced from HRS and/or CRS from Korea),
but no other certification is maintained, Commerce intends to
instruct CBP to suspend the entry and collect cash deposits at the
AD all-others rate (i.e., 3.66 percent) applicable to the AD order
on CORE from Taiwan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See CORE China Circumvention Final, 83 FR at 23896.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix III
Importer Certification
I hereby certify that:
My name is {INSERT COMPANY OFFICIAL'S NAME HERE{time}
and I am an official of {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING COMPANY{time} ;
I have direct personal knowledge of the facts regarding
the importation into the Customs territory of the United States of
the corrosion-resistant steel products produced in Vietnam that
entered under entry number(s) {INSERT ENTRY NUMBER(S){time} and are
covered by this certification. ``Direct personal knowledge'' refers
to facts the certifying party is expected to have in its own
records. For example, the importer should have ``direct personal
knowledge'' of the importation of the product (e.g., the name of the
exporter) in its records;
I have personal knowledge of the facts regarding the
production of the imported products covered by this certification.
``Personal knowledge'' includes facts obtained from another party,
(e.g., correspondence received by the importer (or exporter) from
the producer regarding the source of the input used to produce the
imported products);
These corrosion-resistant steel products produced in
Vietnam do not contain hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel
substrate produced in Taiwan:
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to maintain a copy of this certification
and sufficient documentation supporting this certification (i.e.,
documents maintained in the normal course of business, or documents
obtained by the certifying party, for example, mill certificates,
productions records, invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period
of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years
after the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to provide this certification and
supporting records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of Commerce (Commerce);
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to maintain a copy of the exporter's
certification for the later of (1) a period of five years from the
date of entry or (2) a period of three years after the conclusion of
any litigation in United States courts regarding such entries;
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF IMPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to maintain and provide a copy of the
exporter's certification and supporting records, upon request, to
CBP and/or Commerce;
I understand that the claims made herein, and the
substantiating documentation, are subject to verification by CBP
and/or Commerce;
I understand that failure to maintain the required
certification and/or failure to substantiate the claims made herein
will result in:
[cir] Suspension of liquidation of all unliquidated entries (and
entries for which liquidation has not become final) for which these
requirements were not met and
[cir] the requirement that the importer post applicable
antidumping duty (AD) cash deposits equal to the rates as determined
by Commerce;
I understand that agents of the importer, such as
brokers, are not permitted to make this certification;
This certification was completed at or prior to the
time of Entry; and
I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited
to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially false statements to the U.S.
government.
Signature
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Company Official
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Appendix IV
Exporter Certification
I hereby certify that:
My name is {INSERT COMPANY OFFICIAL'S NAME HERE{time}
and I am an official of {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING COMPANY{time} ;
I have direct personal knowledge of the facts regarding
the production and exportation of the corrosion-resistant steel
products that were sold to the United States under invoice number(s)
INSERT INVOICE NUMBER(S). ``Direct personal knowledge'' refers to
facts the certifying party is expected to have in its own books and
records. For example, an exporter should have ``direct personal
knowledge'' of the producer's identity and location.
The {MERCHANDISE{time} covered this certification was
produced by {NAME OF PRODUCING COMPANY{time} , located at {ADDRESS
OF PRODUCING COMPANY{time} ; for each additional company, repeat:
{NAME OF PRODUCING COMPANY{time} , located at {ADDRESS OF PRODUCING
COMPANY{time} .
[[Page 70941]]
These corrosion-resistant steel products produced in
Vietnam do not contain hot-rolled steel and/or cold-rolled steel
substrate produced in Taiwan:
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to maintain a copy of this certification
and sufficient documentation supporting this certification (i.e.,
documents maintained in the normal course of business, or documents
obtained by the certifying party, for example, mill certificates,
productions records, invoices, etc.) for the later of (1) a period
of five years from the date of entry or (2) a period of three years
after the conclusion of any litigation in the United States courts
regarding such entries;
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING
COMPANY{time} must provide this Exporter Certification to the U.S.
importer by the time of shipment;
I understand that {INSERT NAME OF EXPORTING
COMPANY{time} is required to provide a copy of this certification
and supporting records, upon request, to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) and/or the Department of Commerce (Commerce);
I understand that the claims made herein, and the
substantiating documentation are subject to verification by CBP and/
or Commerce;
I understand that failure to maintain the required
certification and/or failure to substantiate the claims made herein
will result in:
[cir] Suspension of all unliquidated entries (and entries for
which liquidation has not become final) for which these requirements
were not met and
[cir] the requirement that the importer post applicable
antidumping duty (AD) cash deposits equal to the rates as determined
by Commerce;
This certification was completed at or prior to the
time of shipment;
I am aware that U.S. law (including, but not limited
to, 18 U.S.C. 1001) imposes criminal sanctions on individuals who
knowingly and willfully make materially false statements to the U.S.
government.
Signature
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of Company Official
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Title
[FR Doc. 2019-27815 Filed 12-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P