Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 69361-69362 [2019-27264]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs.
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
not later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
If a respondent’s weighted-average
dumping margin is above de minimis in
the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific
assessment rate based on the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for
each importer’s examined sales and the
total entered value of the sales in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).8
If a respondent’s weighted-average
dumping margin or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis in
the final results of this review, we will
instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties in accordance with
the Final Modification for Reviews.9 The
final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise under review
and for future deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Dongkuk
or Hyundai Steel, which Dongkuk or
Hyundai (as applicable) did not know
was destined for the United States, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate these
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.
For the companies identified above
that were not selected for individual
examination, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate entries at the rates listed
above.
We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements for estimated antidumping
duties will be effective upon publication
of the notice of final results of this
8 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied
the assessment rate calculation method adopted in
Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the
Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
9 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at
8103; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
review for all shipments of CTL plate
from Korea entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for companies subject to
this review will be equal to the
weighted-average dumping margins
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
companies not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation but the producer is, then
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recently
completed segment for the producer of
the merchandise; and (4) the cash
deposit rate for all other producers or
exporters will continue to be 0.98
percent,10 the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation, adjusted for
the export-subsidy rate in the
companion countervailing duty
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
Commerce is issuing and publishing
these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 12, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Rates for Non-Examined Companies
10 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 32629, 32630 (July 13,
2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69361
V. Discussion of the Methodology
VI. Currency Conversion
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–27266 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–806]
Silicon Metal From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017–2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Yunnan
Fuyang Trade Co., Ltd. (Fuyang) did not
make a bona fide sale during the period
of review (POR) June 1, 2017 through
May 31, 2018. Therefore, we are
rescinding this administrative review.
DATES: Applicable December 18, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli
Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 14, 2019, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of
this review in the Federal Register 1 and
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On September 13,
2019, we received case briefs from
Yunnan Fuyang Trade Co., Ltd.
(Fuyang) and the petitioner (i.e., Globe
Specialty Metals, Inc.). On September
23, 2019, we received rebuttal briefs
from Fuyang and the petitioner.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
silicon metal containing at least 96.00
but less than 99.99 percent of silicon by
weight, and silicon metal with a higher
aluminum content containing between
89 and 96 percent silicon by weight. For
the full text of the scope of the order,
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.2
1 See Silicon Metal From the People’s Republic of
China: Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 84 FR
40395 (August 14, 2019) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
Continued
18DEN1
69362
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs submitted in this review
are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
is attached as an appendix to this
notice. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Bona Fides Analysis
We preliminarily found that Fuyang’s
sale of subject merchandise to the
United States during the POR is not a
bona fide sale.3 After analyzing parties’
comments, we continue to find that
Fuyang’s sale is not a bona fide sale. We
reached this conclusion based on
multiple issues, including: (a) The
atypical nature of both the price and
quantity of the sale; (b) factors calling
into question whether the sale was
made at arm’s-length; and (c) other
relevant factors.
Because we have determined that
Fuyang had no bona fide sales during
the POR, we are rescinding this
administrative review.
Assessment
Because Commerce is rescinding this
administrative review, we have not
calculated a company-specific dumping
margin for Fuyang. Fuyang remains part
of the China-wide entity and entries of
its subject merchandise during the POR
will be assessed antidumping duties at
the China-wide entity rate. The Chinawide entity rate is 139.49 percent.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
As noted above, Commerce is
rescinding this administrative review.
Thus, we have not calculated a
company-specific dumping margin for
Fuyang. Therefore, entries of Fuyang’s
Order on Silicon Metal from the People’s Republic
of China; 2017–2018,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘2017–2018 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review of Silicon Metal from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Bona
Fide Sales Analysis for Yunnan Fuyang Trade Co.,
Ltd.,’’ dated August 6, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
subject merchandise continue to be
subject to the China-wide entity cash
deposit rate of 139.49 percent. This cash
deposit requirement shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to Administrative
Protective Order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in these segments of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 11, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment: Whether Fuyang’s Sole U.S.
Sale During the Period of Review is Bona
Fide
i. Whether Sale Price Weighs in Favor of
Finding Fuyang’s Sale Was Not Bona
Fide
ii. Whether Sale Quantity Weighs in Favor
of Finding Fuyang’s Sale Was Not Bona
Fide
iii. Whether Sale Timing Weighs in Favor
of Finding Fuyang’s Sale Was Not Bona
Fide
iv. Whether the Goods were Resold at a
Profit
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
v. Whether the Sale was Made on an
Arm’s-Length Basis
vi. Other Relevant Factors
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–27264 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[Docket Number DARS–2019–0063]
Information Collection Requirement;
Covered Defense Telecommunications
Equipment or Services; Request for
OMB Emergency Clearance; Comment
Request
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
DoD is requesting the Office
of Management and Budget provide
emergency clearance of collections of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by January 17, 2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD is
requesting the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) provide emergency
clearance of collections of information
associated with an interim rule to be
published in the Federal Register under
the title ‘‘Covered Defense
Telecommunications Equipment or
Services (DFARS Case 2018–D022).’’
Consistent with 5 CFR 1320.13, DoD
has determined the following conditions
have been met:
a. The collection of information is
needed prior to the expiration of time
periods normally associated with a
routine submission for review under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act in view of the restrictions imposed
by section 1656 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91), which
was signed into law on December 12,
2017. Subsequently, section 889(a)(1)(A)
of the NDAA for FY 2019 (Pub. L. 115–
232), was signed into law on August 13,
2018, and established a similar
Governmentwide prohibition. The
interim DFARS rule implements the
section 1656 and DoD-specific
procedures associated with the section
889(a)(1)(A) prohibitions for DoD, and is
structured to align with and supplement
the higher-level Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) implementation of the
section 889(a)(1)(A) Governmentwide
prohibition. Immediate action is
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69361-69362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27264]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-806]
Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Yunnan
Fuyang Trade Co., Ltd. (Fuyang) did not make a bona fide sale during
the period of review (POR) June 1, 2017 through May 31, 2018.
Therefore, we are rescinding this administrative review.
DATES: Applicable December 18, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eli Lovely, AD/CVD Operations, Office
IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 14, 2019, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
this review in the Federal Register \1\ and invited parties to comment
on the Preliminary Results. On September 13, 2019, we received case
briefs from Yunnan Fuyang Trade Co., Ltd. (Fuyang) and the petitioner
(i.e., Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.). On September 23, 2019, we
received rebuttal briefs from Fuyang and the petitioner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Silicon Metal From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Rescission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2017-2018, 84 FR 40395 (August 14, 2019) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is silicon metal containing at
least 96.00 but less than 99.99 percent of silicon by weight, and
silicon metal with a higher aluminum content containing between 89 and
96 percent silicon by weight. For the full text of the scope of the
order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Silicon Metal from the People's Republic of China; 2017-
2018,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 69362]]
Analysis of the Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs submitted in this
review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of
the issues raised is attached as an appendix to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Bona Fides Analysis
We preliminarily found that Fuyang's sale of subject merchandise to
the United States during the POR is not a bona fide sale.\3\ After
analyzing parties' comments, we continue to find that Fuyang's sale is
not a bona fide sale. We reached this conclusion based on multiple
issues, including: (a) The atypical nature of both the price and
quantity of the sale; (b) factors calling into question whether the
sale was made at arm's-length; and (c) other relevant factors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``2017-2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Silicon Metal from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Yunnan Fuyang Trade Co.,
Ltd.,'' dated August 6, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because we have determined that Fuyang had no bona fide sales
during the POR, we are rescinding this administrative review.
Assessment
Because Commerce is rescinding this administrative review, we have
not calculated a company-specific dumping margin for Fuyang. Fuyang
remains part of the China-wide entity and entries of its subject
merchandise during the POR will be assessed antidumping duties at the
China-wide entity rate. The China-wide entity rate is 139.49 percent.
Cash Deposit Requirements
As noted above, Commerce is rescinding this administrative review.
Thus, we have not calculated a company-specific dumping margin for
Fuyang. Therefore, entries of Fuyang's subject merchandise continue to
be subject to the China-wide entity cash deposit rate of 139.49
percent. This cash deposit requirement shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in these segments of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(5).
Dated: December 11, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment: Whether Fuyang's Sole U.S. Sale During the Period of
Review is Bona Fide
i. Whether Sale Price Weighs in Favor of Finding Fuyang's Sale
Was Not Bona Fide
ii. Whether Sale Quantity Weighs in Favor of Finding Fuyang's
Sale Was Not Bona Fide
iii. Whether Sale Timing Weighs in Favor of Finding Fuyang's
Sale Was Not Bona Fide
iv. Whether the Goods were Resold at a Profit
v. Whether the Sale was Made on an Arm's-Length Basis
vi. Other Relevant Factors
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-27264 Filed 12-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P