Certain Balanced Armature Devices, Products Containing Same, and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation, 65840-65841 [2019-25852]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
65840
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices
California (‘‘Align’’). 82 FR (Dec. 20,
2017). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain color intraoral scanners and
related hardware and software by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 8,363,228 (‘‘the ’228
patent’’); 8,451,456 (‘‘the ’456 patent’’);
8,675,207 (‘‘the ’207 patent’’); 9,101,433
(‘‘the ’433 patent’’); 948,931(‘‘the ’931
patent’’); and 6,685,470 (‘‘the ’470
patent’’). See id. The complaint named
3Shape A/S and 3Shape Inc. as the
respondents. On March 15, 2018, the
ALJ granted Align’s unopposed motion
to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to add as an additional
respondent in this investigation 3Shape
Trios A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark
(respondents are collectively referred to
as ‘‘3Shape’’). See 83 FR 13781–82
(March 30, 2018), unreviewed, Notice
(March 27, 2018). The Office of Unfair
Import Investigations did not participate
in the investigation.
On March 1, 2019, the ALJ issued his
final ID finding that no violation of
section 337 has occurred. On March 18,
2019, Align filed a petition for review
and 3Shape filed a contingent petition
for review of the ID. On March 26, 2019,
all of the parties filed responses to the
respective petitions for review.
On July 18, 2019, the Commission
determined to review the final ID in
part. Specifically, the Commission
determined to review the ID’s findings
on the following issues: (1) Importation;
(2) the construction of ‘‘processor’’; (3)
the construction of ‘‘confocal imaging
techniques’’; (4) all findings concerning
infringement; (5) all findings concerning
invalidity; (6) all findings concerning
whether Align’s products practice one
or more claims of the asserted patents;
and (7) all findings concerning whether
Align’s financial investments and
activities relating to Align’s products
meet the domestic industry
requirement. The Commission requested
briefing on some of the issues under
review, and requested submissions from
the parties, government agencies and
the public on remedy, bonding, and the
public interest. 84 FR 35688 (July 25,
2019). On July 30, 2019, Align and
3Shape filed their written responses to
the Commission’s request for briefing.
On August 6, 2019, Align and 3Shape
filed their reply submissions.
The Commission has examined the
record of this investigation, including
the ALJ’s final ID, the petitions for
review, and the responses thereto, and
filings in response to the Commission’s
request for briefing. The Commission
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Nov 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
affirms in part, with modified reasoning
as discussed in the accompanying
opinion, the ID’s finding of no violation
of section 337. Specifically, the
Commission determines: (1) Claim 1 of
each of the ’228, ’456, and ’207 patents
is infringed; (2) claim 26 of the ’228
patent is infringed; (4) claim 15 of the
’456 patent is not infringed; (5) claim 12
of the ’433 is not infringed; (6) the
asserted claims of the ’228 and ’456
patents are invalid for failing to meet
the written description requirement; (7)
the ’228, ’456, and ’433 patents are not
invalid as anticipated or obvious; (8) the
asserted claim of the ’207 patent is
invalid as obvious; (9) Align’s products
do not practice the ’228, ’456, and ’207
patents; (10) Align’s products practice
claim 12 of the ’433 patent; (11) the
importation requirement is met for
3Shape Trios A/S; (12) to take no
position on whether 3Shape A/S and
3Shape Inc. have met the importation
requirement; (13) to take no position on
whether claim 4 of the ’228 patent is
infringed; (14) to take no position on
secondary considerations for the ’228,
’456, and ’433 patents; and (15) to take
no position on whether Align’s
investments and activities relating to
Align’s products meet the domestic
industry requirement. The Commission
also affirms, without modification, the
ID’s finding of no violation for the ’931
and ’470 patents. The investigation is
terminated.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 22, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–25849 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1186]
Certain Balanced Armature Devices,
Products Containing Same, and
Components Thereof; Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
August 29, 2019, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Knowles Corporation of Itasca,
Illinois; Knowles Electronics, LLC of
Itasca, Illinois; and Knowles Electronics
(Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China.
Supplements to the complaint were
filed on September 18 and November 5,
2019. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, and
in the sale of certain balanced armature
devices, products containing same, and
components thereof by reason of
misappropriation of trade secrets, the
threat or effect of which is to destroy or
substantially injure a domestic industry.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order or, in the
alternative, limited exclusion orders,
and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The authority for institution of this
investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 22, 2019, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, or in the sale of certain
products identified in paragraph (2) by
reason of misappropriation of trade
secrets, the threat or effect of which is
to destroy or substantially injure an
industry in the United States;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is balanced armature
devices (also known as balanced
armature receivers), and devices used
on the ear or in the ear canal containing
accused balanced armature devices
(earphones, ear buds, headsets,
headphones, in-ear monitors, hearing
aids, hearing aid replacement receiver
tubes, receiver in canal (RIC)
replacement modules, and personal
sound amplifiers), and components of
devices used on the ear or in the ear
canal containing accused balanced
armature devices.
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Knowles Corporation, 1151 Maplewood
Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Knowles Electronics, LLC, 1151
Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Knowles Electronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.,
No. 20, Chunxing Road, Xiangcheng
District, Suzhou, 215131, Jiangsu
Province, China.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Liang Li (a/k/a Ryan Li), Room 602,
Building 48, Fengqing Shuian Garden,
Xizhou Road, Suzhou Industrial Park,
Suzhou City, 215028, Jiangsu
Province, China.
Shenzhen Bellsing Acoustic Technology
Co., Ltd., 12/f, Sanhang Science and
Technology Building, 45 Gaoxin
South Ninth Road, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen City, 518057, Guangdong
Province, China.
Suzhou Bellsing Acoustic Technology
Co., Ltd., Ruiqi Building, No. 668,
Fenting Avenue, Suzhou Industrial
Park, Suzhou City, 215028, Jiangsu
Province, China.
Bellsing Corporation, 3333 Warrenville
Rd, #155, Lisle, IL 60532.
Dongguan Bellsing Precision Device Co.,
Ltd., Fifth Industry Zone, Xieshan
Village, Xiegang Town, Dongguan,
523598, Guangdong Province, China.
Dongguan Xinyao Electronics Industrial
Co., Ltd., d/b/a Fidue Acoustics,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Nov 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
Liuhua West Street, Xiakou,
Dongcheng District, 523115,
Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Soundlink Co., Ltd., 2F–1# Building
North, No. 89 Songshan Road,
Shishan Industrial Complex Park,
New District, 215129 Suzhou, China.
Magnatone Hearing Aid Corporation d/
b/a Persona, Medical and InEarz
Audio, 170 N Cypress Way,
Casselberry, FL 32707.
Jerry Harvey Audio LLC, 111 W.
Jefferson St., Ste. 300, Orlando, FL
32801.
Magic Dynamics, LLC d/b/a MagicEar,
22089 U.S. Hwy 19 N, Clearwater, FL
33765.
Campfire Audio, LLC, 2400 SE Ankeny
St., Portland, OR 97214.
Clear Tune Monitors, Inc., 5528
Commerce Dr., Orlando, FL 32839.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
Administrative Law Judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: November 22, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–25852 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–513 and 731–
TA–1249 (Review)]
Sugar From Mexico; Institution of FiveYear Reviews
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted reviews
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’), as amended, to determine
whether termination of the suspension
investigation on sugar from Mexico
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury.
Pursuant to the Act, interested parties
are requested to respond to this notice
by submitting the information specified
below to the Commission.
DATES: Instituted November 29, 2019.
To be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is December 30,
2019. Comments on the adequacy of
responses may be filed with the
Commission by February 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On December 19, 2014,
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) suspended antidumping
and countervailing duty investigations
on imports of sugar from Mexico (79 FR
78039 and 78044, December 29, 2014).1
SUMMARY:
1 On January 16, 2015, Commerce received timely
requests pursuant to sections 734(g) and 704(g) of
the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1673c(g), 1671c(g)),
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65841
Continued
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65840-65841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25852]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1186]
Certain Balanced Armature Devices, Products Containing Same, and
Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 29, 2019, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Knowles
Corporation of Itasca, Illinois; Knowles Electronics, LLC of Itasca,
Illinois; and Knowles Electronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. of China.
Supplements to the complaint were filed on September 18 and November 5,
2019. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, and in the sale of certain balanced
armature devices, products containing same, and components thereof by
reason of misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of
which is to destroy or substantially injure a domestic industry. The
complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order or, in
the alternative, limited exclusion orders, and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205-2560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
19 CFR 210.10 (2018).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 22, 2019, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(A) of
[[Page 65841]]
section 337 in the importation into the United States, or in the sale
of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
misappropriation of trade secrets, the threat or effect of which is to
destroy or substantially injure an industry in the United States;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is balanced armature
devices (also known as balanced armature receivers), and devices used
on the ear or in the ear canal containing accused balanced armature
devices (earphones, ear buds, headsets, headphones, in-ear monitors,
hearing aids, hearing aid replacement receiver tubes, receiver in canal
(RIC) replacement modules, and personal sound amplifiers), and
components of devices used on the ear or in the ear canal containing
accused balanced armature devices.
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Knowles Corporation, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Knowles Electronics, LLC, 1151 Maplewood Drive, Itasca, IL 60143.
Knowles Electronics (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., No. 20, Chunxing Road,
Xiangcheng District, Suzhou, 215131, Jiangsu Province, China.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Liang Li (a/k/a Ryan Li), Room 602, Building 48, Fengqing Shuian
Garden, Xizhou Road, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou City, 215028,
Jiangsu Province, China.
Shenzhen Bellsing Acoustic Technology Co., Ltd., 12/f, Sanhang Science
and Technology Building, 45 Gaoxin South Ninth Road, Nanshan District,
Shenzhen City, 518057, Guangdong Province, China.
Suzhou Bellsing Acoustic Technology Co., Ltd., Ruiqi Building, No. 668,
Fenting Avenue, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou City, 215028, Jiangsu
Province, China.
Bellsing Corporation, 3333 Warrenville Rd, #155, Lisle, IL 60532.
Dongguan Bellsing Precision Device Co., Ltd., Fifth Industry Zone,
Xieshan Village, Xiegang Town, Dongguan, 523598, Guangdong Province,
China.
Dongguan Xinyao Electronics Industrial Co., Ltd., d/b/a Fidue
Acoustics, Liuhua West Street, Xiakou, Dongcheng District, 523115,
Dongguan, Guangdong, China.
Soundlink Co., Ltd., 2F-1# Building North, No. 89 Songshan Road,
Shishan Industrial Complex Park, New District, 215129 Suzhou, China.
Magnatone Hearing Aid Corporation d/b/a Persona, Medical and InEarz
Audio, 170 N Cypress Way, Casselberry, FL 32707.
Jerry Harvey Audio LLC, 111 W. Jefferson St., Ste. 300, Orlando, FL
32801.
Magic Dynamics, LLC d/b/a MagicEar, 22089 U.S. Hwy 19 N, Clearwater, FL
33765.
Campfire Audio, LLC, 2400 SE Ankeny St., Portland, OR 97214.
Clear Tune Monitors, Inc., 5528 Commerce Dr., Orlando, FL 32839.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the Administrative
Law Judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 22, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-25852 Filed 11-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P