Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article II, Section 2.03 of the Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange To Remove the Independence Requirement for the Director Elected by Exchange Membership Organizations, 65875-65877 [2019-25834]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–87588; File No. SR–NYSE– 2019–62] Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article II, Section 2.03 of the Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange To Remove the Independence Requirement for the Director Elected by Exchange Membership Organizations November 22, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 15, 2019, New York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend Article II, Section 2.03 of the Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange (‘‘Operating Agreement’’), to remove the independence requirement for the director elected by Exchange membership organizations, and make additional conforming and nonsubstantive edits. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, 1 15 2 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend Article II, Section 2.03 (Board) of the Exchange’s Operating Agreement to remove the independence requirement for the director elected by Exchange membership organizations, and make additional conforming and nonsubstantive edits. Proposed Amendments to Section 2.03 Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, at least twenty percent of the Board shall be persons who are not members of the board of directors of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (‘‘ICE’’), the Exchange’s ultimate parent company, but qualify as independent under the Exchange’s director independence policy (such policy, the ‘‘Independence Policy’’ and such directors, the ‘‘Non-Affiliated Directors’’).3 The Non-Affiliated Directors are nominated by the member organizations of the Exchange (‘‘Member Organizations’’),4 through a process set forth in the Operating Agreement.5 Background The requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent dates to the de-mutualization of the Exchange, when the Exchange filed with the Commission a proposed new organizational structure, including that all Board members would be required to be independent.6 Some commentators 3 See Operating Agreement, Article II, Section 2.03(a)(iii). See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 84635 (November 20, 2018), 83 FR 60924 (November 27, 2018) (SR–NYSE–2018–56) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend Article II, Section 2.03(h)(ii) and Article VI of the Operating Agreement), and 85913 (May 22, 2019), 84 FR 24853 (May 29, 2019) (SR–NYSE–2019–27) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend the Independence Policy of the Board of Directors of the Exchange). 4 ‘‘Member Organizations’’ includes ‘‘members, allied members and member organizations of the [Exchange].’’ Operating Agreement, Article II, Section 2.02 (Rules; Supervision of Member Organizations). As discussed below, the Exchange proposes to amend the definition to delete the obsolete reference to ‘‘allied members.’’ 5 See id., Section 2.03(a)(iii)–(v). Other than to remove the independence requirement, the Exchange does not propose to amend the process for nominating the Non-Affiliated Directors. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (February 27, 2006), 71 FR 11251 (March 6, 2006) (SR–NYSE–2005–77) (order granting approval of PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65875 on that proposal questioned whether the independence requirement comported with the ‘‘fair representation’’ requirement of the Exchange Act,7 asking whether ‘‘such a structure is desirable from a policy perspective because it will exclude nearly all persons with significant and recent industry experience, which will result in inferior regulatory oversight.’’ 8 The Commission approved the Exchange’s proposal, concluding that the fair representation requirement was met by the proposed structure. The Commission recognized that other demutualized self-regulatory organizations allowed for direct member representation on their boards of directors, and stated that there was not only one method to satisfy the fair representation requirement of the Exchange Act.9 The requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent precludes the Member Organizations from nominating a candidate from among their own numbers or who was recently employed by a Member or Member Organization. In this way, it limits members’ ability to nominate the individual of their choice. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to remove the requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent. After the proposed change, as required by the Operating Agreement 10 and as is true now, (a) the majority of the members of the Board shall be U.S. persons that satisfy the requirements of the Independence Policy, and (b) at least twenty percent of the members of the Board shall be Non-Affiliated Directors.11 Proposed Change proposed rule change and Amendment Nos. 1, 3, and 5 thereto and notice of filing and order granting accelerated approval to Amendment Nos. 6 and 8 relating to the NYSE’s business combination with Archipelago Holdings, Inc.). 7 Section 6(b)(3) of the Exchange Act requires that the rules of a national securities exchange assure the fair representation of its members in the selection of its directors and administration of its affairs. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3). 8 71 FR 11251, supra note 6, at 11260 (citing letter from Marc E. Lackritz, President, Securities Industry Association and Micah S. Green, President and CEO, The Bond Market Association, to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated February 2, 2006). 9 Id. at note 104. 10 See Operating Agreement, Article II, Section 2.03(a)(i). 11 The balance of the Board membership is not required to be independent or a Non-Affiliated Director. Presently, a senior officer of ICE is a member of the Board. E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 65876 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to the Independence Policy,12 a director is not independent— and therefore cannot be a Non-Affiliated Director—if, among other things, the director: • Or one of his or her immediate family members is, or within the last year was, a Member 13 of the Exchange; • Is, or within the last year was, employed by a Member Organization; 14 • Has within the last year received from any Member Organization more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation, or received from Member Organizations in the aggregate an amount of direct compensation which in any one year is more than 10 percent of the director’s annual gross income for such year; 15 or • Is affiliated, directly or indirectly, with a Member Organization. The proposed amendments would remove these limitations by: • Amending Section 2.03(a)(i) to delete the requirement that NonAffiliated Directors qualify as independent under the Independence Policy and adding a sentence stating that ‘‘[t]he Non-Affiliated Directors need not be independent, and must meet any status or constituent affiliation qualifications prescribed by the Company and filed with and approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘SEC’).’’ • Amending the third sentence of the second paragraph of Section 2.03(a)(iv) and fourth sentence of Section 2.03(l) to remove the references to potential petition candidates and current directors qualifying as independent under the Independence Policy. In addition to allowing Member Organizations to nominate the NonAffiliated Directors of their choice, the proposed amendments would have the benefit of bringing Section 2.03 into greater conformity with Section 2.03 of the operating agreement of the Exchange’s affiliate NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’), which does not require that the NYSE American Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent under the NYSE American 12 The Independence Policy can be found at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/regulation/ nyse/Director_Independence_Policy_of_New_York_ Stock_Exchange_LLC.pdf. See also 84 FR 24853, supra note 3. 13 The term ‘‘Member’’ is used in the Independence Policy as defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Exchange Act. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(3)(A)(i). 14 The term ‘‘Member Organization’’ is used in the Independence Policy as defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A)(ii), 3(a)(3)(A)(iii) and 3(a)(3)(A)(iv) of the Exchange Act. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(3)(A)(ii)–(iv). 15 Such limitations exclude director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 Director Independence Policy.16 The proposed additional sentence in Section 2.03(a)(i) would be the same as the second sentence in Section 2.03(a)(i) of the NYSE American Operating Agreement. In addition, the proposed amendments would bring the Operating Agreement into greater conformity with the bylaws of the Exchange’s affiliates NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc., none of which require that the directors nominated by their trading permit holders be qualified as independent.17 The Exchange notes that the proposed changes also would be consistent with the governing documents of other selfregulatory organizations, such as the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC 18 and CBOE BYX Exchange, Inc.,19 which do not require that the directors nominated by the membership of the exchange be independent. Additional Proposed Amendments The Exchange proposes to delete the reference to ‘‘allied members’’ from the definition of ‘‘Member Organizations’’ in Section 2.02 because the Exchange no longer has allied members and therefore the reference is obsolete.20 The Exchange proposes to make a non-substantive amendment to the first sentence of Article III, Section 3.03 (No Transfers) to replace the definition of the Commission with ‘‘SEC.’’ Because proposed Section 2.03(a)(i) would 16 See Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE American Operating Agreement’’), Section 2.03(a) and (l). The NYSE American Director Independence Policy is the same as the Exchange’s Independence Policy. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85919 (May 22, 2019), 84 FR 24842 (May 29, 2019) (SR–NYSEAMER–2019–20) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend the Independence Policy of the Board of Directors of NYSE American). 17 See Bylaws of NYSE Arca, Inc., Article III, Section 3.02(a) and NYSE Arca Rule 3.2(b)(3)(C)(ii) (Directors Nominated by the Trading Permit Holders); Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of NYSE Chicago, Inc., Article II, Section 2 (General Composition and Term of Office); and Sixth Amended and Restated By-Laws of NYSE National, Inc., Article III, Sections 3.2(a) (General Composition). 18 See Bylaws of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, Article I (noting that a ‘‘Member Representative Director may, but is not required to be, an officer, director, employee, or agent of a Nasdaq Member’’). 19 See Ninth Amended and Restated Bylaws of CBOE BYX Exchange, Inc., Article III, Sections 3.1 and 3.2. 20 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 43720 (August 21, 2018), 83 FR 43720 (August 27, 2018) (SR–NYSE–2018–38) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend the Independence Policy of the Board of Directors of the Exchange); and 58549 (September 15, 2008), 73 FR 54444 (September 19, 2008) (SR– NYSE–2008–80) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change and Amendment No. 1 thereto conforming certain NYSE Rules to changes to NYSE incorporated rules recently filed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.). PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 include a definition of the Commission, a definition would no longer be required in Section 3.03. Finally, the Exchange proposes to make non-substantive conforming changes to the title, recitals and signature page of the Operating Agreement, which would become the Thirteenth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Exchange Act 21 in general, and Section 6(b)(3) 22 in particular, in that it is intended to give members a voice in the selection of an exchange’s directors and the administration of its affairs. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) 23 of the Act, in that it would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with the provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. As noted above, the requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent under the Independence Policy precludes the Member Organizations from nominating a candidate from among their own numbers or who was recently employed by a Member or Member Organization. Yet those are the very persons who, by virtue of their work as, with, or in affiliation with a Member Organization, are the most informed about the Member Organizations, their operations, and their concerns. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would be consistent with Section 6(b)(3) because it would give the Member Organizations more flexibility and greater options in selecting their preferred nominees for the NonAffiliated Directors and, therefore, the administration of the Exchange’s affairs. In so doing, the proposed rule change would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act. At the same time, the Exchange would continue to have a majority of the members of the Board qualify as independent under the Independence Policy. The Exchange notes that the proposed changes to Section 2.03 would have the 21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3). 23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1). 22 See E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES additional benefit of bringing the Operating Agreement into greater conformity with the NYSE American Operating Agreement, which does not require that the NYSE American NonAffiliated Directors qualify as independent under the NYSE American Director Independence Policy, and the bylaws of the Exchange’s affiliates NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc., none of which require that the directors nominated by their trading permit holders be qualified as independent. In addition, the proposed amendments would make Section 2.03 more consistent with the governing documents of other selfregulatory organizations that do not require that the directors nominated by the membership of the exchange be independent. The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to Section 2.02 of the Operating Agreement would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and comply with the provisions of the Exchange Act by its members and persons associated with members because it would remove an obsolete reference to allied members, thereby adding clarity and transparency to the Operating Agreement by removing any confusion that may result if it retained such obsolete reference. The Exchange further believes that market participants would benefit from the increased clarity, reducing potential confusion. The proposed amendments to effect non-substantive technical and conforming changes would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members, with the provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange because the changes would ensure that persons subject to the Exchange’s jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public can more easily navigate and understand the Operating Agreement. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to address competitive issues but rather is concerned solely with the administration and functioning of the Exchange. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:49 Nov 27, 2019 Jkt 250001 C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or up [sic] to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NYSE–2019–62 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–2019–62. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65877 provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–2019–62, and should be submitted on or before December 20, 2019. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.24 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–25834 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736. Extension: Rule 17f–7; SEC File No. 270–470; OMB Control No. 3235–0529. Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521) (‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit these existing collections of information to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for extension and approval. Rule 17f–7 (17 CFR 270.17f–7) permits a fund under certain conditions to maintain its foreign assets with an eligible securities depository, which has to meet minimum standards for a depository. The fund or its investment adviser generally determines whether the depository complies with those requirements based on information 24 17 E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 29NON1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65875-65877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25834]



[[Page 65875]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87588; File No. SR-NYSE-2019-62]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Article II, Section 
2.03 of the Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the 
Exchange To Remove the Independence Requirement for the Director 
Elected by Exchange Membership Organizations

November 22, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on November 15, 2019, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments 
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Article II, Section 2.03 of the 
Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange 
(``Operating Agreement''), to remove the independence requirement for 
the director elected by Exchange membership organizations, and make 
additional conforming and non-substantive edits. The proposed rule 
change is available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the 
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Article II, Section 2.03 (Board) of 
the Exchange's Operating Agreement to remove the independence 
requirement for the director elected by Exchange membership 
organizations, and make additional conforming and non-substantive 
edits.
Proposed Amendments to Section 2.03
    Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, at least twenty percent of the 
Board shall be persons who are not members of the board of directors of 
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (``ICE''), the Exchange's ultimate 
parent company, but qualify as independent under the Exchange's 
director independence policy (such policy, the ``Independence Policy'' 
and such directors, the ``Non-Affiliated Directors'').\3\ The Non-
Affiliated Directors are nominated by the member organizations of the 
Exchange (``Member Organizations''),\4\ through a process set forth in 
the Operating Agreement.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Operating Agreement, Article II, Section 2.03(a)(iii). 
See also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 84635 (November 20, 
2018), 83 FR 60924 (November 27, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2018-56) (notice of 
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend 
Article II, Section 2.03(h)(ii) and Article VI of the Operating 
Agreement), and 85913 (May 22, 2019), 84 FR 24853 (May 29, 2019) 
(SR-NYSE-2019-27) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
proposed rule change to amend the Independence Policy of the Board 
of Directors of the Exchange).
    \4\ ``Member Organizations'' includes ``members, allied members 
and member organizations of the [Exchange].'' Operating Agreement, 
Article II, Section 2.02 (Rules; Supervision of Member 
Organizations). As discussed below, the Exchange proposes to amend 
the definition to delete the obsolete reference to ``allied 
members.''
    \5\ See id., Section 2.03(a)(iii)-(v). Other than to remove the 
independence requirement, the Exchange does not propose to amend the 
process for nominating the Non-Affiliated Directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    The requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as 
independent dates to the de-mutualization of the Exchange, when the 
Exchange filed with the Commission a proposed new organizational 
structure, including that all Board members would be required to be 
independent.\6\ Some commentators on that proposal questioned whether 
the independence requirement comported with the ``fair representation'' 
requirement of the Exchange Act,\7\ asking whether ``such a structure 
is desirable from a policy perspective because it will exclude nearly 
all persons with significant and recent industry experience, which will 
result in inferior regulatory oversight.'' \8\ The Commission approved 
the Exchange's proposal, concluding that the fair representation 
requirement was met by the proposed structure. The Commission 
recognized that other demutualized self-regulatory organizations 
allowed for direct member representation on their boards of directors, 
and stated that there was not only one method to satisfy the fair 
representation requirement of the Exchange Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53382 (February 27, 
2006), 71 FR 11251 (March 6, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-77) (order granting 
approval of proposed rule change and Amendment Nos. 1, 3, and 5 
thereto and notice of filing and order granting accelerated approval 
to Amendment Nos. 6 and 8 relating to the NYSE's business 
combination with Archipelago Holdings, Inc.).
    \7\ Section 6(b)(3) of the Exchange Act requires that the rules 
of a national securities exchange assure the fair representation of 
its members in the selection of its directors and administration of 
its affairs. 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
    \8\ 71 FR 11251, supra note 6, at 11260 (citing letter from Marc 
E. Lackritz, President, Securities Industry Association and Micah S. 
Green, President and CEO, The Bond Market Association, to Nancy M. 
Morris, Secretary, Commission, dated February 2, 2006).
    \9\ Id. at note 104.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as 
independent precludes the Member Organizations from nominating a 
candidate from among their own numbers or who was recently employed by 
a Member or Member Organization. In this way, it limits members' 
ability to nominate the individual of their choice. Accordingly, the 
Exchange proposes to remove the requirement that Non-Affiliated 
Directors qualify as independent. After the proposed change, as 
required by the Operating Agreement \10\ and as is true now, (a) the 
majority of the members of the Board shall be U.S. persons that satisfy 
the requirements of the Independence Policy, and (b) at least twenty 
percent of the members of the Board shall be Non-Affiliated 
Directors.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Operating Agreement, Article II, Section 2.03(a)(i).
    \11\ The balance of the Board membership is not required to be 
independent or a Non-Affiliated Director. Presently, a senior 
officer of ICE is a member of the Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Change

[[Page 65876]]

    Pursuant to the Independence Policy,\12\ a director is not 
independent--and therefore cannot be a Non-Affiliated Director--if, 
among other things, the director:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Independence Policy can be found at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/regulation/nyse/Director_Independence_Policy_of_New_York_Stock_Exchange_LLC.pdf. See 
also 84 FR 24853, supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Or one of his or her immediate family members is, or 
within the last year was, a Member \13\ of the Exchange;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The term ``Member'' is used in the Independence Policy as 
defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A)(i) of the Exchange Act. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(a)(3)(A)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Is, or within the last year was, employed by a Member 
Organization; \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The term ``Member Organization'' is used in the 
Independence Policy as defined in Section 3(a)(3)(A)(ii), 
3(a)(3)(A)(iii) and 3(a)(3)(A)(iv) of the Exchange Act. See 15 
U.S.C. 78c(a)(3)(A)(ii)-(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Has within the last year received from any Member 
Organization more than $100,000 per year in direct compensation, or 
received from Member Organizations in the aggregate an amount of direct 
compensation which in any one year is more than 10 percent of the 
director's annual gross income for such year; \15\ or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Such limitations exclude director and committee fees and 
pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service 
(provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on 
continued service).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Is affiliated, directly or indirectly, with a Member 
Organization.
    The proposed amendments would remove these limitations by:
     Amending Section 2.03(a)(i) to delete the requirement that 
Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent under the Independence 
Policy and adding a sentence stating that ``[t]he Non-Affiliated 
Directors need not be independent, and must meet any status or 
constituent affiliation qualifications prescribed by the Company and 
filed with and approved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the `SEC').''
     Amending the third sentence of the second paragraph of 
Section 2.03(a)(iv) and fourth sentence of Section 2.03(l) to remove 
the references to potential petition candidates and current directors 
qualifying as independent under the Independence Policy.
    In addition to allowing Member Organizations to nominate the Non-
Affiliated Directors of their choice, the proposed amendments would 
have the benefit of bringing Section 2.03 into greater conformity with 
Section 2.03 of the operating agreement of the Exchange's affiliate 
NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American''), which does not require that the 
NYSE American Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as independent under the 
NYSE American Director Independence Policy.\16\ The proposed additional 
sentence in Section 2.03(a)(i) would be the same as the second sentence 
in Section 2.03(a)(i) of the NYSE American Operating Agreement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Twelfth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of 
NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American Operating Agreement''), Section 
2.03(a) and (l). The NYSE American Director Independence Policy is 
the same as the Exchange's Independence Policy. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 85919 (May 22, 2019), 84 FR 24842 (May 29, 
2019) (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-20) (notice of filing and immediate 
effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend the Independence 
Policy of the Board of Directors of NYSE American).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the proposed amendments would bring the Operating 
Agreement into greater conformity with the bylaws of the Exchange's 
affiliates NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago, Inc. and NYSE National, Inc., 
none of which require that the directors nominated by their trading 
permit holders be qualified as independent.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Bylaws of NYSE Arca, Inc., Article III, Section 3.02(a) 
and NYSE Arca Rule 3.2(b)(3)(C)(ii) (Directors Nominated by the 
Trading Permit Holders); Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of NYSE 
Chicago, Inc., Article II, Section 2 (General Composition and Term 
of Office); and Sixth Amended and Restated By-Laws of NYSE National, 
Inc., Article III, Sections 3.2(a) (General Composition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the proposed changes also would be 
consistent with the governing documents of other self-regulatory 
organizations, such as the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC \18\ and CBOE BYX 
Exchange, Inc.,\19\ which do not require that the directors nominated 
by the membership of the exchange be independent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Bylaws of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, Article I 
(noting that a ``Member Representative Director may, but is not 
required to be, an officer, director, employee, or agent of a Nasdaq 
Member'').
    \19\ See Ninth Amended and Restated Bylaws of CBOE BYX Exchange, 
Inc., Article III, Sections 3.1 and 3.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Proposed Amendments
    The Exchange proposes to delete the reference to ``allied members'' 
from the definition of ``Member Organizations'' in Section 2.02 because 
the Exchange no longer has allied members and therefore the reference 
is obsolete.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 43720 (August 21, 
2018), 83 FR 43720 (August 27, 2018) (SR-NYSE-2018-38) (notice of 
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change to amend 
the Independence Policy of the Board of Directors of the Exchange); 
and 58549 (September 15, 2008), 73 FR 54444 (September 19, 2008) 
(SR-NYSE-2008-80) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness of 
proposed rule change and Amendment No. 1 thereto conforming certain 
NYSE Rules to changes to NYSE incorporated rules recently filed by 
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to make a non-substantive amendment to the 
first sentence of Article III, Section 3.03 (No Transfers) to replace 
the definition of the Commission with ``SEC.'' Because proposed Section 
2.03(a)(i) would include a definition of the Commission, a definition 
would no longer be required in Section 3.03.
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to make non-substantive conforming 
changes to the title, recitals and signature page of the Operating 
Agreement, which would become the Thirteenth Amended and Restated 
Operating Agreement of the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Exchange Act \21\ in general, and Section 
6(b)(3) \22\ in particular, in that it is intended to give members a 
voice in the selection of an exchange's directors and the 
administration of its affairs. The Exchange believes that the proposed 
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) \23\ of the Act, in that 
it would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity 
to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, 
and to enforce compliance by its exchange members and persons 
associated with its exchange members, with the provisions of the 
Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of 
the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \22\ See 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(3).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted above, the requirement that Non-Affiliated Directors 
qualify as independent under the Independence Policy precludes the 
Member Organizations from nominating a candidate from among their own 
numbers or who was recently employed by a Member or Member 
Organization. Yet those are the very persons who, by virtue of their 
work as, with, or in affiliation with a Member Organization, are the 
most informed about the Member Organizations, their operations, and 
their concerns. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
rule change would be consistent with Section 6(b)(3) because it would 
give the Member Organizations more flexibility and greater options in 
selecting their preferred nominees for the Non-Affiliated Directors 
and, therefore, the administration of the Exchange's affairs. In so 
doing, the proposed rule change would enable the Exchange to be so 
organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes 
of the Exchange Act. At the same time, the Exchange would continue to 
have a majority of the members of the Board qualify as independent 
under the Independence Policy.
    The Exchange notes that the proposed changes to Section 2.03 would 
have the

[[Page 65877]]

additional benefit of bringing the Operating Agreement into greater 
conformity with the NYSE American Operating Agreement, which does not 
require that the NYSE American Non-Affiliated Directors qualify as 
independent under the NYSE American Director Independence Policy, and 
the bylaws of the Exchange's affiliates NYSE Arca, Inc., NYSE Chicago, 
Inc. and NYSE National, Inc., none of which require that the directors 
nominated by their trading permit holders be qualified as independent. 
In addition, the proposed amendments would make Section 2.03 more 
consistent with the governing documents of other self-regulatory 
organizations that do not require that the directors nominated by the 
membership of the exchange be independent.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to Section 2.02 
of the Operating Agreement would enable the Exchange to be so organized 
as to have the capacity to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act 
and comply with the provisions of the Exchange Act by its members and 
persons associated with members because it would remove an obsolete 
reference to allied members, thereby adding clarity and transparency to 
the Operating Agreement by removing any confusion that may result if it 
retained such obsolete reference. The Exchange further believes that 
market participants would benefit from the increased clarity, reducing 
potential confusion.
    The proposed amendments to effect non-substantive technical and 
conforming changes would enable the Exchange to be so organized as to 
have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange 
Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its exchange members 
and persons associated with its exchange members, with the provisions 
of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the 
rules of the Exchange because the changes would ensure that persons 
subject to the Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing 
public can more easily navigate and understand the Operating Agreement.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The proposed rule 
change is not intended to address competitive issues but rather is 
concerned solely with the administration and functioning of the 
Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or up [sic] to 90 days (i) as the Commission may 
designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and 
publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2019-62 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-62. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2019-62, and should be submitted on 
or before December 20, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-25834 Filed 11-27-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.