Procurement Roles and Responsibilities for Job Corps Contracts, 64738-64740 [2019-25441]
Download as PDF
64738
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and approved by appropriate personnel.
Additionally, it would typically be
appropriate for the summary to provide
each subsequent reviewer with an
understanding of the support behind
these adjustments. Therefore, the staff
normally would expect management to
document the nature of any adjustments
and the underlying rationale for making
the changes.
The staff also normally would expect
this documentation to be provided to
those among management making the
final determination of the allowance for
credit losses amount.
4. Validating a Systematic Methodology
Question 7: What is the staff’s
guidance to a registrant on validating,
and documenting the validation of, its
systematic methodology used to
estimate allowance for credit losses?
Interpretive Response: The staff
believes that a registrant’s allowance for
credit losses methodology is considered
reasonable when it results in a valuation
account that adjusts the net amount of
its existing portfolio to cash flows
expected to be collected.42
The staff normally would expect the
registrant’s systematic methodology to
include procedures to assess the
continued relevance and reliability of
methods, data, and assumptions used to
estimate expected cash flows.
To verify that the allowance for credit
losses methodology is reasonable and
conforms to GAAP, the staff believes it
would be appropriate for management
to establish internal control policies,
appropriate for the size of the registrant
and the type and complexity of its loan
products and modeling methods.
These policies may include
procedures for a review, by a party who
is independent of the allowance for
expected credit losses estimation
process, of the allowance methodology
and its application in order to confirm
its effectiveness.
While registrants may employ many
different procedures when assessing the
reasonableness of the design and
performance of its allowance for credit
losses methodology and appropriateness
of the data and assumptions used, the
procedures should allow management to
determine whether there may be
deficiencies in its overall methodology.
Examples of procedures may include:
• A review of how management’s
prior assumptions (including
expectations regarding loan
delinquencies, troubled debt
restructurings, write-offs, and
recoveries) have compared to actual
loan performance;
42 See
ASC paragraph 326–20–30–1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
• A review of the allowance for credit
losses process by a party that is
independent and possesses
competencies on the subject matter.
This often involves the independent
party reviewing, on a test basis, source
documents and underlying data and
assumptions to determine that the
established methodology develops
reasonable loss estimates;
• A retrospective analysis of whether
the models used performed in a manner
consistent with the intended purpose of
developing an estimate of expected
credit losses; and
• When the fair value of collateral is
used, an evaluation of the appraisal
process of the underlying collateral.
This may be accomplished by
periodically comparing the appraised
value to the actual sales price on
selected properties sold.
The staff believes that management
should support its validation process
with documentation of the specific
validation procedures performed,
including any findings of an
independent reviewer. The staff
normally would expect that, if the
methodology is changed based upon the
findings of the validation process,
documentation that describes and
supports the changes would be
maintained.
The staff encourages anyone with
questions or suggestions regarding this
interpretation to contact the staff via
email at OCA@sec.gov or phone at (202)
551–5300.
[FR Doc. 2019–25450 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 686
RIN 1205–AB96
Procurement Roles and
Responsibilities for Job Corps
Contracts
Employment and Training
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this final rule, the
Department of Labor (Department)
makes two procedural changes to its
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act (WIOA) Job Corps regulations to
enable the Secretary to delegate
procurement authority as it relates to
the development and issuance of
requests for proposals for the operation
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of Job Corps centers, outreach and
admissions, career transitional services,
and other operational support services.
The Department is taking this
procedural action to align regulatory
provisions with the relevant WIOA
statutory language and to provide
greater flexibility for internal operations
and management of the Job Corps
program.
DATES: This final rule will become
effective on December 26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi M. Casta, Deputy Administrator,
Office of Policy Development and
Research, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW, Room
N–5641, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693–3700 (this is not a
toll-free number).
Individuals with hearing or speech
impairments may access the telephone
number above via TTY by calling the
toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department is amending two
provisions of 20 CFR part 686, which
implements subtitle C of title I of WIOA.
Through these amendments, the
Department is aligning these regulatory
provisions with the language in WIOA
by broadening the authority to issue
contract solicitations from the
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA) to the Secretary of
Labor. The Department is making this
procedural change to the WIOA
regulation to provide greater flexibility
in the management and operation of the
Job Corps program by allowing the
Secretary of Labor to designate the
component of the Department that is
authorized to issue solicitations for the
operation of Job Corps centers, outreach
and admissions, career transitional
services, and other operational support
services. This change will provide the
Department with the flexibility to more
efficiently manage the Job Corps
procurement process, which will in turn
allow greater economies of scale and
operational efficiencies. This rule is
consistent with the President’s
Management Agenda Cross-Agency
Priority (CAP) Goal Number 5—Sharing
Quality Services. The Department is
implementing this CAP, in part, via the
Department’s Enterprise-Wide Shared
Services Initiatives whose primary goals
are as follows:
1. Improve human resources
efficiency, effectiveness, and
accountability;
2. Provide modern technology
solutions that empower the DOL
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
mission and serve the American public
through collaboration and innovation;
3. Maximize DOL’s federal buying
power through effective procurement
management; and
4. Safeguard fiscal integrity, and
promote the effective and efficient use
of resources.
This rule will assist the Department’s
implementation of its Enterprise-Wide
Shared Services Initiative.
This rule is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
II. Summary of Final Rule
Sec. 147(a) of WIOA authorizes the
Secretary of Labor to enter into
agreements with eligible entities to
operate Job Corps centers and to provide
activities to a Job Corps center. Two
provisions in the regulation
implementing subtitle C of Title I of
WIOA implement section 147(a). Title
20 CFR 686.310(a) broadly states that
the Secretary selects eligible entities to
operate contract centers on a
competitive basis in accordance with
applicable statutes and regulations, and
20 CFR 686.340(a) states that the
Secretary selects eligible entities to
provide outreach and admission, career
transition, and operational support
services on a competitive basis in
accordance with applicable statutes and
regulations. However, both provisions
also specifically require ETA to develop
and issue solicitations for these Job
Corps contracts. These provisions are
inconsistent with section 147(a) and
constrain the Department’s ability to
assign the authority to develop and
issue solicitations to whichever
component of the agency determined
appropriate to further the important
goals of selecting the appropriate
entities to support the Job Corps
program.
This final rule amends §§ 686.310(a)
and 686.340(a) by replacing ‘‘ETA’’ with
‘‘the Secretary.’’ Through this final rule,
the Department is aligning the text of
sections 686.310(a) and 686.340(a) with
the statutory language in section 147(a)
of WIOA, eliminating the inconsistency
between the regulation and the statute.
This change affords the Department
greater flexibility to manage and oversee
the Job Corps procurement process in a
manner that it determines appropriate.
III. Discussion of Public Comments
The Department invited written
comments on all aspects of the proposed
rule from interested parties for
consideration prior to issuing a final
rule (84 FR 45449). The written
comment period closed on September
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
30, 2019. The Department received two
significant adverse comments. The
Department also received one comment
that was outside the scope of the
rulemaking.
One commenter that represents a
national association expressed a
concern that decentralization of
procurement authority outside of ETA
would result in ‘‘the further separation
of Job Corps’ programmatic, budget, and
procurement authorities which could
negatively impact Job Corps center
operations, students, and taxpayers.’’
The commenter opined that the
proposal, if implemented, would place
Job Corps’ procurement function under
a different agency, with different
political leadership, different goals and
priorities, and different measures of
performance success. This, according to
the commenter, could potentially
negatively impact Job Corps students.
The commenter suggested that because
of the interrelation between program,
budget, and contracting, all Job Corps
contracting functions should be
consolidated under a single political
official or, ideally, within the Office of
Job Corps, but regardless suggested that
the Department establish performance
measures for contracting officials related
to student outcomes.
The second commenter opined that
the proposed change would affect how
contracts for outreach and admission,
career transition and operational
services would be awarded.
Specifically, the commenter expressed
concern that the change would
politicize the awarding of Job Corps
contracts, in contravention of OMB’s
Uniform Guidance, rather than awards
being made on the basis of an offeror’s
technical ability to provide the services.
No change to the proposal is being
made in response to these comments.
This change aligns the Job Corps
regulation with the statutory language
and affords the Department greater
flexibility in managing the Job Corps
procurement functions. The Department
disagrees that this change will adversely
impact the operation of the Job Corps
program. The Department and ETA will
continue to support Job Corps and its
programmatic needs and interests,
including ensuring that there is
appropriate coordination and
consultation during the various phases
of the procurement process. ETA
program and budget staff will continue
to work closely with the assigned
procurement staff to develop and
review, as appropriate, solicitations for
Job Corps operation and support
contracts. Similarly, these changes do
not involve or limit the evaluation of
proposals or quotations submitted in
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64739
response to solicitations. Additionally,
the Department disagrees that this
change will politicize the awarding of
Job Corps contracts. The Department
will continue to conduct all Job Corps
procurements in accordance with the
relevant provisions of the Federal
Acquisition Regulations, which,
contrary to the commenter’s assertion,
governs the development and award of
all Job Corps contract solicitations and
awards, as well as in compliance with
all of the WIOA statutory and regulatory
requirements and the evaluation and
selection criteria announced in
Department solicitations. Regarding the
commenter’s suggestion to establish
performance measures for contracting
officials related to student outcomes, the
Department does not tie performance
measures for contracting officials related
to either formation or administration of
contracts to program outcomes.
Successful program outcomes are the
responsibility of the office
administering the program, in this case
the Office of Job Corps, and the
contractors directly serving students.
Therefore, the Department is
finalizing the regulatory text as
proposed.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review)
Executive Order 12866 requires that
regulatory agencies assess both the costs
and benefits of significant regulatory
actions. Under the Executive Order, a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ is one
meeting any of a number of specified
conditions, including the following:
Having an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more; creating a
serious inconsistency or interfering with
an action of another agency; materially
altering the budgetary impact of
entitlements or the rights of entitlement
recipients, or raising novel legal or
policy issues. The Department has
determined that this final rule is not a
‘‘significant’’ regulatory action and a
cost-benefit and economic analysis is
not required. This regulation merely
makes a procedural change to allow
flexibility to manage and oversee the Job
Corps procurement process in a manner
that the Department determines
appropriate.
Executive Order 13563 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64740
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility to minimize
burden.
This rule makes only a procedural
change to allow flexibility to manage
and oversee the Job Corps procurement
process in a manner that the Department
determines appropriate. Therefore, this
rule is not expected to have any
regulatory impacts.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
at 5 U.S.C. 603(a), requires agencies to
prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, which describes the impact of
the final rule on small entities. Section
605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an
analysis, if the final rule is not expected
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule does not affect
small entities as defined in the RFA.
Therefore, the Department certifies that
the final rule will not have a significant
economic impacts on a substantial
number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
Department consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public. The Department has determined
that this rule does not alter any
information collection burdens.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Section 6 of E.O. 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consult with State
entities when a regulation or policy may
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, within the
meaning of the E.O. Section 3(b) of the
E.O. further provides that Federal
agencies must implement regulations
that have a substantial direct effect only
if statutory authority permits the
regulation and it is of national
significance.
This final rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States,
the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
levels of government, within the
meaning of the E.O. This final rule
merely makes a procedural change for
internal Departmental operations and
management for Job Corps procurement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulatory action has been
reviewed in accordance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(the Reform Act). Under the Reform Act,
a Federal agency must determine
whether a regulation proposes a Federal
mandate that would result in the
increased expenditures by State, local,
or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any single year. This final
rule merely makes an administrative
change regarding the Departmental
entity authorized for Job Corps
procurement responsibilities. Therefore,
the relevant requirements the Reform
Act do not apply.
Executive Order 13175 (Indian Tribal
Governments)
The Department has reviewed the
final rule under the terms of E.O. 13175
and DOL’s Tribal Consultation Policy,
and have concluded that the changes to
regulatory text which are the focus of
the final rule would not have tribal
implications, as these changes do not
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, nor the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Therefore, no consultations with tribal
governments, officials, or other tribal
institutions were necessary.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 686
Employment, Grant programs—labor,
Job Corps.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department amends 20
CFR part 686 as follows:
PART 686—THE JOBS CORPS UNDER
TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE
INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT
1. The authority citation for part 686
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 142, 144, 146, 147, 159,
189, 503, Pub. L. 113–128, 128 Stat. 1425
(Jul. 22, 2014).
2. Amend § 686.310 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 686.310 How are entities selected to
receive funding to operate centers?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible
entities to operate contract centers on a
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 686.340 How are entities selected to
receive funding to provide outreach and
admission, career transition and other
operations support services?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible
entities to provide outreach and
admission, career transition, and
operational services on a competitive
basis in accordance with applicable
statutes and regulations. In selecting an
entity, the Secretary issues requests for
proposals (RFP) for operational support
services according to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter
1) and Department of Labor Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The
Secretary develops RFPs for operational
support services in consultation with
the Governor, the center workforce
council (if established), and the Local
WDB for the workforce development
area in which the center is located.
*
*
*
*
*
John Pallasch,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019–25441 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
Amended Regulatory Text
PO 00000
competitive basis in accordance with
applicable statutes and regulations. In
selecting an entity, the Secretary issues
requests for proposals (RFPs) for the
operation of all contract centers
according to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and
Department of Labor Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The
Secretary develops RFPs for center
operators in consultation with the
Governor, the center workforce council
(if established), and the Local WDB for
the workforce development area in
which the center is located.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 686.340 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771
[Docket No. ATF 33F; AG Order No. 4577–
2019]
RIN 1140–AA40
Rules of Practice in Explosives
License and Permit Proceedings
(2007R–5P); Revisions Reflecting
Changes Consistent With the
Homeland Security Act of 2002
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64738-64740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25441]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
20 CFR Part 686
RIN 1205-AB96
Procurement Roles and Responsibilities for Job Corps Contracts
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this final rule, the Department of Labor (Department) makes
two procedural changes to its Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
(WIOA) Job Corps regulations to enable the Secretary to delegate
procurement authority as it relates to the development and issuance of
requests for proposals for the operation of Job Corps centers, outreach
and admissions, career transitional services, and other operational
support services. The Department is taking this procedural action to
align regulatory provisions with the relevant WIOA statutory language
and to provide greater flexibility for internal operations and
management of the Job Corps program.
DATES: This final rule will become effective on December 26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi M. Casta, Deputy Administrator,
Office of Policy Development and Research, U.S. Department of Labor,
200 Constitution Avenue NW, Room N-5641, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone (202) 693-3700 (this is not a toll-free number).
Individuals with hearing or speech impairments may access the
telephone number above via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department is amending two provisions of 20 CFR part 686, which
implements subtitle C of title I of WIOA. Through these amendments, the
Department is aligning these regulatory provisions with the language in
WIOA by broadening the authority to issue contract solicitations from
the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) to the Secretary of
Labor. The Department is making this procedural change to the WIOA
regulation to provide greater flexibility in the management and
operation of the Job Corps program by allowing the Secretary of Labor
to designate the component of the Department that is authorized to
issue solicitations for the operation of Job Corps centers, outreach
and admissions, career transitional services, and other operational
support services. This change will provide the Department with the
flexibility to more efficiently manage the Job Corps procurement
process, which will in turn allow greater economies of scale and
operational efficiencies. This rule is consistent with the President's
Management Agenda Cross-Agency Priority (CAP) Goal Number 5--Sharing
Quality Services. The Department is implementing this CAP, in part, via
the Department's Enterprise-Wide Shared Services Initiatives whose
primary goals are as follows:
1. Improve human resources efficiency, effectiveness, and
accountability;
2. Provide modern technology solutions that empower the DOL
[[Page 64739]]
mission and serve the American public through collaboration and
innovation;
3. Maximize DOL's federal buying power through effective
procurement management; and
4. Safeguard fiscal integrity, and promote the effective and
efficient use of resources.
This rule will assist the Department's implementation of its
Enterprise-Wide Shared Services Initiative.
This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
II. Summary of Final Rule
Sec. 147(a) of WIOA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to enter into
agreements with eligible entities to operate Job Corps centers and to
provide activities to a Job Corps center. Two provisions in the
regulation implementing subtitle C of Title I of WIOA implement section
147(a). Title 20 CFR 686.310(a) broadly states that the Secretary
selects eligible entities to operate contract centers on a competitive
basis in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations, and 20
CFR 686.340(a) states that the Secretary selects eligible entities to
provide outreach and admission, career transition, and operational
support services on a competitive basis in accordance with applicable
statutes and regulations. However, both provisions also specifically
require ETA to develop and issue solicitations for these Job Corps
contracts. These provisions are inconsistent with section 147(a) and
constrain the Department's ability to assign the authority to develop
and issue solicitations to whichever component of the agency determined
appropriate to further the important goals of selecting the appropriate
entities to support the Job Corps program.
This final rule amends Sec. Sec. 686.310(a) and 686.340(a) by
replacing ``ETA'' with ``the Secretary.'' Through this final rule, the
Department is aligning the text of sections 686.310(a) and 686.340(a)
with the statutory language in section 147(a) of WIOA, eliminating the
inconsistency between the regulation and the statute. This change
affords the Department greater flexibility to manage and oversee the
Job Corps procurement process in a manner that it determines
appropriate.
III. Discussion of Public Comments
The Department invited written comments on all aspects of the
proposed rule from interested parties for consideration prior to
issuing a final rule (84 FR 45449). The written comment period closed
on September 30, 2019. The Department received two significant adverse
comments. The Department also received one comment that was outside the
scope of the rulemaking.
One commenter that represents a national association expressed a
concern that decentralization of procurement authority outside of ETA
would result in ``the further separation of Job Corps' programmatic,
budget, and procurement authorities which could negatively impact Job
Corps center operations, students, and taxpayers.'' The commenter
opined that the proposal, if implemented, would place Job Corps'
procurement function under a different agency, with different political
leadership, different goals and priorities, and different measures of
performance success. This, according to the commenter, could
potentially negatively impact Job Corps students. The commenter
suggested that because of the interrelation between program, budget,
and contracting, all Job Corps contracting functions should be
consolidated under a single political official or, ideally, within the
Office of Job Corps, but regardless suggested that the Department
establish performance measures for contracting officials related to
student outcomes.
The second commenter opined that the proposed change would affect
how contracts for outreach and admission, career transition and
operational services would be awarded. Specifically, the commenter
expressed concern that the change would politicize the awarding of Job
Corps contracts, in contravention of OMB's Uniform Guidance, rather
than awards being made on the basis of an offeror's technical ability
to provide the services.
No change to the proposal is being made in response to these
comments. This change aligns the Job Corps regulation with the
statutory language and affords the Department greater flexibility in
managing the Job Corps procurement functions. The Department disagrees
that this change will adversely impact the operation of the Job Corps
program. The Department and ETA will continue to support Job Corps and
its programmatic needs and interests, including ensuring that there is
appropriate coordination and consultation during the various phases of
the procurement process. ETA program and budget staff will continue to
work closely with the assigned procurement staff to develop and review,
as appropriate, solicitations for Job Corps operation and support
contracts. Similarly, these changes do not involve or limit the
evaluation of proposals or quotations submitted in response to
solicitations. Additionally, the Department disagrees that this change
will politicize the awarding of Job Corps contracts. The Department
will continue to conduct all Job Corps procurements in accordance with
the relevant provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulations, which,
contrary to the commenter's assertion, governs the development and
award of all Job Corps contract solicitations and awards, as well as in
compliance with all of the WIOA statutory and regulatory requirements
and the evaluation and selection criteria announced in Department
solicitations. Regarding the commenter's suggestion to establish
performance measures for contracting officials related to student
outcomes, the Department does not tie performance measures for
contracting officials related to either formation or administration of
contracts to program outcomes. Successful program outcomes are the
responsibility of the office administering the program, in this case
the Office of Job Corps, and the contractors directly serving students.
Therefore, the Department is finalizing the regulatory text as
proposed.
IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review)
Executive Order 12866 requires that regulatory agencies assess both
the costs and benefits of significant regulatory actions. Under the
Executive Order, a ``significant regulatory action'' is one meeting any
of a number of specified conditions, including the following: Having an
annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; creating a
serious inconsistency or interfering with an action of another agency;
materially altering the budgetary impact of entitlements or the rights
of entitlement recipients, or raising novel legal or policy issues. The
Department has determined that this final rule is not a ``significant''
regulatory action and a cost-benefit and economic analysis is not
required. This regulation merely makes a procedural change to allow
flexibility to manage and oversee the Job Corps procurement process in
a manner that the Department determines appropriate.
Executive Order 13563 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health
[[Page 64740]]
and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility to
minimize burden.
This rule makes only a procedural change to allow flexibility to
manage and oversee the Job Corps procurement process in a manner that
the Department determines appropriate. Therefore, this rule is not
expected to have any regulatory impacts.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), at 5 U.S.C. 603(a), requires
agencies to prepare and make available for public comment an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, which describes the impact of the
final rule on small entities. Section 605 of the RFA allows an agency
to certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the final rule
is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This final rule does not affect small
entities as defined in the RFA. Therefore, the Department certifies
that the final rule will not have a significant economic impacts on a
substantial number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the Department consider the impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed on the public. The Department
has determined that this rule does not alter any information collection
burdens.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Section 6 of E.O. 13132 requires Federal agencies to consult with
State entities when a regulation or policy may have a substantial
direct effect on the States, the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, within the
meaning of the E.O. Section 3(b) of the E.O. further provides that
Federal agencies must implement regulations that have a substantial
direct effect only if statutory authority permits the regulation and it
is of national significance.
This final rule does not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, within the meaning of the E.O. This final
rule merely makes a procedural change for internal Departmental
operations and management for Job Corps procurement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulatory action has been reviewed in accordance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act). Under the Reform
Act, a Federal agency must determine whether a regulation proposes a
Federal mandate that would result in the increased expenditures by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any single year. This final
rule merely makes an administrative change regarding the Departmental
entity authorized for Job Corps procurement responsibilities.
Therefore, the relevant requirements the Reform Act do not apply.
Executive Order 13175 (Indian Tribal Governments)
The Department has reviewed the final rule under the terms of E.O.
13175 and DOL's Tribal Consultation Policy, and have concluded that the
changes to regulatory text which are the focus of the final rule would
not have tribal implications, as these changes do not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, nor the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Therefore, no consultations with tribal governments, officials, or
other tribal institutions were necessary.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 686
Employment, Grant programs--labor, Job Corps.
Amended Regulatory Text
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department amends 20
CFR part 686 as follows:
PART 686--THE JOBS CORPS UNDER TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION
AND OPPORTUNITY ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 686 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 142, 144, 146, 147, 159, 189, 503, Pub. L. 113-
128, 128 Stat. 1425 (Jul. 22, 2014).
0
2. Amend Sec. 686.310 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 686.310 How are entities selected to receive funding to operate
centers?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible entities to operate contract
centers on a competitive basis in accordance with applicable statutes
and regulations. In selecting an entity, the Secretary issues requests
for proposals (RFPs) for the operation of all contract centers
according to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and
Department of Labor Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The
Secretary develops RFPs for center operators in consultation with the
Governor, the center workforce council (if established), and the Local
WDB for the workforce development area in which the center is located.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 686.340 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 686.340 How are entities selected to receive funding to provide
outreach and admission, career transition and other operations support
services?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible entities to provide outreach and
admission, career transition, and operational services on a competitive
basis in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations. In
selecting an entity, the Secretary issues requests for proposals (RFP)
for operational support services according to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and Department of Labor Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The Secretary develops RFPs for
operational support services in consultation with the Governor, the
center workforce council (if established), and the Local WDB for the
workforce development area in which the center is located.
* * * * *
John Pallasch,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019-25441 Filed 11-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P