Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend the Fat Finger Check in Rule 21.17 as it Applies To Stop Limit Orders, 64600-64602 [2019-25318]
Download as PDF
64600
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
compliance with the terms and
conditions of the application and the
procedures established to achieve such
compliance.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–25308 Filed 11–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[Release No. 34–87561; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2019–096]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Amend the Fat Finger Check in Rule
21.17 as it Applies To Stop Limit
Orders
November 18, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
12, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX Options’’)
proposes to amend the fat finger check
in Rule 21.17 as it applies to Stop Limit
Orders. The text of the proposed rule
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fat finger check under Rule 21.17(b) as
it applies to Stop Limit Orders.
Currently, Rule 21.17(b) provides that if
a User submits a buy (sell) limit order
to the System with a price that is more
than an Exchange-determined buffer
amount above (below) the NBO (NBB),
the System will reject or cancel back to
the User the limit order (i.e., the ‘‘fat
finger’’ check). This check applies to
orders and quotes with a limit price
with the exception of bulk messages.5
The Exchange proposes to add Stop
Limit Orders to Rule 21.17(b) as an
additional order type to which the fat
finger check does not apply. A Stop
Limit Order is an order that becomes a
limit order when the stop price (selected
by the User) is elected. A Stop Limit
Order to buy is elected and becomes a
buy limit order when the consolidated
last sale in the option occurs at or
above, or the NBB is equal to or higher
than, the specified stop price. A Stop
Limit Order to sell is elected and
becomes a sell limit order when the
consolidated last sale in the option
occurs at or below, or the NBO is equal
to or lower than, the specified stop
price.6 Stop Limit Orders allow Users
increased control and flexibility over
their transactions and the prices at
which they are willing to execute an
order. The purpose of a Stop Limit
Order is to not execute upon entry, and
instead rest in the System until the
market reaches a certain price level, at
which time the order could be executed.
As such, when a buy (sell) Stop Limit
Order is activated, its limit price may
5 The Exchange notes that a separate provision
governs a fat finger check specific to bulk messages.
See Rule 21.17(f).
6 See Rule 21.1(d)(12) (definition of Stop Limit
Order).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
likely be outside of the buffer amount
above (below) the NBO (NBB) in
anticipation of capturing rapidly
increasing (decreasing) market prices.
The primary purpose of the fat finger
check is to prevent limit orders from
executing at potentially erroneous
prices upon entry, because the limit
prices are ‘‘too far away’’ from the thencurrent NBBO. As noted above, a Stop
Limit Order is not intended to execute
upon entry. Currently, because a Stop
Limit Order does not ‘‘become’’ a limit
order until activated, the limit order fat
finger check applies to a Stop Limit
Order at the time the order is activated.
As noted above, at that time, the limit
price may cross the NBO, and thus may
be cancelled due to the fat finger check
if the limit price crosses the NBO by
more than the buffer. Therefore, the
manner in which the fat finger check
cancels/rejects a Stop Limit Order may
conflict with the intended purpose of a
Stop Limit Order and a User’s control
over the time when and the price at
which it executes. For example, assume
that when the NBBO is 8.00 × 8.05, a
User submits a Stop Limit Order to buy
at 9.25 and a stop price of 8.15 and the
Exchange has set the fat finger buffer to
$1.00. Assume the NBBO then updates
to 8.15 × 8.20. The updated NBB equals
the stop price of the order will activate
the stop price of the Stop Limit Order,
converting it into a limit order to buy at
9.25, which would be more than the fat
finger buffer of $1.00 above the current
NBO, thus canceled/rejected by the
System in accordance with the fat finger
check. The Exchange also notes that the
System is currently able to apply only
one buffer amount across multiple order
types. Therefore, the Exchange would
not be able to expand the buffer amount
to accommodate Stop Limit Orders
without potentially over-expanding the
buffer amount for other limit orders that
execute upon entry.
The Exchange notes that a User’s Stop
Limit Orders would still be subject to
other price protections already in place
on the Exchange. In particular, drillthrough price protections are in place
pursuant to Rule 21.17(d), such that, if
a buy (sell) order would execute (i.e.,
when the stop price for a Stop Limit
Order is activated), the System executes
the order up to a buffer amount
(established by the Exchange) above
(below) the NBO (NBB) that existed at
the time of order entry (‘‘the drillthrough price’’).
The Exchange believes that allowing a
Stop Limit Order, once activated, with
a limit price outside of the NBBO
(notwithstanding any fat finger buffer)
to execute at that limit price (up to the
drill-through buffer amount) is
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
consistent with the intended purpose of
a Stop Limit Order. As stated, when a
buy (sell) Stop Limit Order is activated,
its limit price is intended to be at a
consequential amount above (below) the
NBO (NBB) in order to capture rapidly
increasing (decreasing) trade prices, to
which the NBBO would as rapidly track
and reflect. To cancel or reject such
orders based on the NBBO at the time
of its activation would inhibit Stop
Limit Orders from capturing favorable
trade prices as a result of a rapidly
shifting market. The Exchange further
notes that its affiliated exchange, Cboe
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’),
recently submitted a rule filing that also
proposed to exclude Stop Limit Orders
from its fat finger check, which function
in substantively the same manner as on
the Exchange.7
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the proposed rule
change benefits market participants by
ensuring that they are able to use Stop
Limit Orders to achieve their intended
purpose. As stated, Stop Limit Orders
are intended to increase User price
control and flexibility, particularly in
the face of price swings and market
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87455
(November 4, 2019), 84 FR 60461 (November 8,
2019) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend the
Fat Finger Check in Rule 5.34 as It Applies to StopLimit Orders) (SR–CBOE–2019–102).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
volatility, by resting in the System until
the market reaches a certain price level.
Thus, they are not intended to execute
upon entry. Conversely, the primary
purpose of the fat finger check is to
prevent limit orders from executing at
potentially erroneous prices upon entry,
because the limit prices are ‘‘too far
away’’ from the then-current NBBO. By
excluding Stop Limit Orders from the
fat finger check, which would currently
cancel/reject a Stop Limit Order if its
buy (sell) limit price was above (below)
the NBO (NBB) upon activation of its
stop limit price, the proposed rule
change removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and national market system
by allowing Users the control and
flexibility to set the limit prices on Stop
Limit Orders so as to capture significant
market fluctuations, which, as stated,
result in corresponding significant
adjustments in the NBBO. Therefore, the
proposed rule change is designed to
protect investors by allowing their Stop
Limit Orders to execute as intended
without being canceled or rejected in
connection with the NBBO that existed
at the time of their activation, and
instead to consider rapid price
movements and corresponding NBBO
adjustments. The Exchange notes that
the proposed rule change will not affect
the protection of investors or the
maintenance of a fair and orderly
market because the drill-through price
controls would apply to Stop Limit
Orders when their stop prices are
activated and they become limit orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change will not impose
any burden on intramarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because all Users’ Stop Limit Orders
will be excluded from the fat finger
check in the same manner. Also, all
Users’ Stop Limit Orders will continue
to be subject to other specific price
controls in place once their stop prices
are activated and they become limit
orders. The proposed rule change will
not impose any burden on intermarket
competition that that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the
proposed change is merely designed to
allow Users’ Stop Limit Orders to
execute in a manner that achieves their
intended purpose by updating a price
protection mechanism already in place
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64601
on the Exchange and applicable only to
trading on the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 11 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.12
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 13 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 14
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Exchange believes
that waiver of the operative delay is
appropriate because, as the Exchange
discussed above, excluding Stop Limit
Orders from the fat finger check, which
would currently cancel/reject a Stop
Limit Order if its buy (sell) limit price
was above (below) the NBO (NBB) upon
activation of its stop limit price, will
benefit market participants by ensuring
that they are able to use Stop Limit
Orders to achieve their intended
purpose. Thus, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change is
designed to protect investors by
allowing their Stop Limit Orders to
execute as intended without being
canceled or rejected due to the
application of the fat finger check
provision.
The Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
12 17
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64602
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
investors and the public interest
because the proposal will permit Stop
Limit Orders to execute as intended and
not be inadvertently cancelled in certain
situation, as discussed above, by the fat
finger check provision. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposal as operative upon filing.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2019–096 and
should be submitted on or before
December 13, 2019.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeBZX–2019–096 on the subject line.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeBZX–2019–096. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission also has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
[FR Doc. 2019–25318 Filed 11–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–87558; File No. SR–ICEEU–
2019–025]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Europe Limited; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change, SecurityBased Swap Submission or Advance
Notice Relating to Amendments to the
ICE Clear Europe Clearing Rules and
General Contract Terms
November 18, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
12, 2019, ICE Clear Europe Limited
(‘‘ICE Clear Europe’’ or the ‘‘Clearing
House’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule changes described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by ICE Clear
Europe. ICE Clear Europe filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(4)(ii) thereunder,4 such that the
proposed rule change was immediately
16 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change, Security-Based Swap
Submission, or Advance Notice
The principal purpose of the
proposed amendments is for ICE Clear
Europe to amend its Clearing Rules (the
‘‘Rules’’) 5 and General Contact Terms in
connection with the clearing of F&O
contracts for a new market, ICE Futures
Abu Dhabi (‘‘IFAD’’).
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based
Swap Submission or Advance Notice
In its filing with the Commission, ICE
Clear Europe included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. ICE
Clear Europe has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections (A), (B), and (C)
below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change, Security-Based
Swap Submission or Advance Notice
(a) Purpose
ICE Clear Europe is proposing to
amend its Rules in order to provide
clearing services to IFAD, an affiliated
newly established futures exchange
which will form part of the
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. global
network of exchanges.6 IFAD will
operate an energy futures and options
market and intends to initially launch a
physically delivered futures contract
whose underlying is Murban crude oil.7
5 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings specified in the ICE Clear
Europe Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’).
6 Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. has announced
the planned launch of IFAD, which will be a
recognized investment exchange under the laws of
the Abu Dhabi Global Market (‘‘ADGM’’).
7 The initial launch of IFAD trading is expected
to be in the first half of 2020, subject to completion
of all regulatory approvals and other conditions.
ICE Clear Europe expects that prior to the launch,
it will adopt amendments to its Delivery Procedures
relating to settlement of the launched contracts,
which will be filed with the Commission under
Rule 19b–4.
IFAD has stated that it may in the future list other
crude oil and crude-oil related products and other
financial futures or options contracts on such
futures contracts, subject to applicable regulatory
authorizations.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64600-64602]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25318]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-87561; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-096]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Amend the Fat Finger Check in Rule 21.17 as it Applies To Stop Limit
Orders
November 18, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 12, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX Options'')
proposes to amend the fat finger check in Rule 21.17 as it applies to
Stop Limit Orders. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its fat finger check under Rule
21.17(b) as it applies to Stop Limit Orders. Currently, Rule 21.17(b)
provides that if a User submits a buy (sell) limit order to the System
with a price that is more than an Exchange-determined buffer amount
above (below) the NBO (NBB), the System will reject or cancel back to
the User the limit order (i.e., the ``fat finger'' check). This check
applies to orders and quotes with a limit price with the exception of
bulk messages.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange notes that a separate provision governs a fat
finger check specific to bulk messages. See Rule 21.17(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to add Stop Limit Orders to Rule 21.17(b) as
an additional order type to which the fat finger check does not apply.
A Stop Limit Order is an order that becomes a limit order when the stop
price (selected by the User) is elected. A Stop Limit Order to buy is
elected and becomes a buy limit order when the consolidated last sale
in the option occurs at or above, or the NBB is equal to or higher
than, the specified stop price. A Stop Limit Order to sell is elected
and becomes a sell limit order when the consolidated last sale in the
option occurs at or below, or the NBO is equal to or lower than, the
specified stop price.\6\ Stop Limit Orders allow Users increased
control and flexibility over their transactions and the prices at which
they are willing to execute an order. The purpose of a Stop Limit Order
is to not execute upon entry, and instead rest in the System until the
market reaches a certain price level, at which time the order could be
executed. As such, when a buy (sell) Stop Limit Order is activated, its
limit price may likely be outside of the buffer amount above (below)
the NBO (NBB) in anticipation of capturing rapidly increasing
(decreasing) market prices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Rule 21.1(d)(12) (definition of Stop Limit Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary purpose of the fat finger check is to prevent limit
orders from executing at potentially erroneous prices upon entry,
because the limit prices are ``too far away'' from the then-current
NBBO. As noted above, a Stop Limit Order is not intended to execute
upon entry. Currently, because a Stop Limit Order does not ``become'' a
limit order until activated, the limit order fat finger check applies
to a Stop Limit Order at the time the order is activated. As noted
above, at that time, the limit price may cross the NBO, and thus may be
cancelled due to the fat finger check if the limit price crosses the
NBO by more than the buffer. Therefore, the manner in which the fat
finger check cancels/rejects a Stop Limit Order may conflict with the
intended purpose of a Stop Limit Order and a User's control over the
time when and the price at which it executes. For example, assume that
when the NBBO is 8.00 x 8.05, a User submits a Stop Limit Order to buy
at 9.25 and a stop price of 8.15 and the Exchange has set the fat
finger buffer to $1.00. Assume the NBBO then updates to 8.15 x 8.20.
The updated NBB equals the stop price of the order will activate the
stop price of the Stop Limit Order, converting it into a limit order to
buy at 9.25, which would be more than the fat finger buffer of $1.00
above the current NBO, thus canceled/rejected by the System in
accordance with the fat finger check. The Exchange also notes that the
System is currently able to apply only one buffer amount across
multiple order types. Therefore, the Exchange would not be able to
expand the buffer amount to accommodate Stop Limit Orders without
potentially over-expanding the buffer amount for other limit orders
that execute upon entry.
The Exchange notes that a User's Stop Limit Orders would still be
subject to other price protections already in place on the Exchange. In
particular, drill-through price protections are in place pursuant to
Rule 21.17(d), such that, if a buy (sell) order would execute (i.e.,
when the stop price for a Stop Limit Order is activated), the System
executes the order up to a buffer amount (established by the Exchange)
above (below) the NBO (NBB) that existed at the time of order entry
(``the drill-through price'').
The Exchange believes that allowing a Stop Limit Order, once
activated, with a limit price outside of the NBBO (notwithstanding any
fat finger buffer) to execute at that limit price (up to the drill-
through buffer amount) is
[[Page 64601]]
consistent with the intended purpose of a Stop Limit Order. As stated,
when a buy (sell) Stop Limit Order is activated, its limit price is
intended to be at a consequential amount above (below) the NBO (NBB) in
order to capture rapidly increasing (decreasing) trade prices, to which
the NBBO would as rapidly track and reflect. To cancel or reject such
orders based on the NBBO at the time of its activation would inhibit
Stop Limit Orders from capturing favorable trade prices as a result of
a rapidly shifting market. The Exchange further notes that its
affiliated exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe Options''), recently
submitted a rule filing that also proposed to exclude Stop Limit Orders
from its fat finger check, which function in substantively the same
manner as on the Exchange.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87455 (November 4,
2019), 84 FR 60461 (November 8, 2019) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend
the Fat Finger Check in Rule 5.34 as It Applies to Stop-Limit
Orders) (SR-CBOE-2019-102).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the proposed rule change benefits market
participants by ensuring that they are able to use Stop Limit Orders to
achieve their intended purpose. As stated, Stop Limit Orders are
intended to increase User price control and flexibility, particularly
in the face of price swings and market volatility, by resting in the
System until the market reaches a certain price level. Thus, they are
not intended to execute upon entry. Conversely, the primary purpose of
the fat finger check is to prevent limit orders from executing at
potentially erroneous prices upon entry, because the limit prices are
``too far away'' from the then-current NBBO. By excluding Stop Limit
Orders from the fat finger check, which would currently cancel/reject a
Stop Limit Order if its buy (sell) limit price was above (below) the
NBO (NBB) upon activation of its stop limit price, the proposed rule
change removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market and national market system by allowing Users the control
and flexibility to set the limit prices on Stop Limit Orders so as to
capture significant market fluctuations, which, as stated, result in
corresponding significant adjustments in the NBBO. Therefore, the
proposed rule change is designed to protect investors by allowing their
Stop Limit Orders to execute as intended without being canceled or
rejected in connection with the NBBO that existed at the time of their
activation, and instead to consider rapid price movements and
corresponding NBBO adjustments. The Exchange notes that the proposed
rule change will not affect the protection of investors or the
maintenance of a fair and orderly market because the drill-through
price controls would apply to Stop Limit Orders when their stop prices
are activated and they become limit orders.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change
will not impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because all Users' Stop Limit Orders will be excluded from the fat
finger check in the same manner. Also, all Users' Stop Limit Orders
will continue to be subject to other specific price controls in place
once their stop prices are activated and they become limit orders. The
proposed rule change will not impose any burden on intermarket
competition that that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act because the proposed change is merely designed
to allow Users' Stop Limit Orders to execute in a manner that achieves
their intended purpose by updating a price protection mechanism already
in place on the Exchange and applicable only to trading on the
Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \13\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \14\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay is appropriate
because, as the Exchange discussed above, excluding Stop Limit Orders
from the fat finger check, which would currently cancel/reject a Stop
Limit Order if its buy (sell) limit price was above (below) the NBO
(NBB) upon activation of its stop limit price, will benefit market
participants by ensuring that they are able to use Stop Limit Orders to
achieve their intended purpose. Thus, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is designed to protect investors by allowing their
Stop Limit Orders to execute as intended without being canceled or
rejected due to the application of the fat finger check provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of
[[Page 64602]]
investors and the public interest because the proposal will permit Stop
Limit Orders to execute as intended and not be inadvertently cancelled
in certain situation, as discussed above, by the fat finger check
provision. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay
and designates the proposal as operative upon filing.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please
include File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-096 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-096. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-096 and should be submitted
on or before December 13, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-25318 Filed 11-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P