Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Draft Research Test Procedures, 64405-64406 [2019-25217]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Notices
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–25223 Filed 11–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0102]
RIN 2127–ZRIN
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Draft Research Test Procedures
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comments (RFC).
AGENCY:
NHTSA seeks public
comment on a series of nine draft
research test procedures developed by
the agency to assess the performance of
certain types of Advanced Driver
Assistance Systems (ADAS) available to
consumers. NHTSA is specifically
requesting comment on whether these
draft research test procedures
adequately, objectively, and practically
assess the system performance of the
underlying ADAS in a test track
environment. NHTSA intends to use
these draft research test procedures to
further its research goals by using the
output from clearly defined test
methods to help better understand
system operation, performance, and
potential limitations.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than January 21, 2020.
ADDRESSES:
Documents: The draft research test
procedures described in this RFC are
available for viewing in PDF format in
Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0102.
Comments: You may submit
comments, identified by Docket No.
NHTSA–2019–0102, by any of the
following methods:
• Internet: To submit comments
electronically, go to the U.S.
Government regulations website at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: Written comments may be
faxed to 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
• Hand Delivery: If you submit
written comments by hand or courier,
please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, Washington, DC between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• You may call Docket Management
at 1–800–647–5527.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information, see the Public Participation
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice, DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS, accessible through https://
www.transportation.gov/privacy. To
facilitate tracking and response, we
encourage commenters to provide their
name, or the name of their organization;
however, submission of names is
completely optional. All timely
comments will be fully considered,
regardless of whether commenters
directly identify themselves. If you wish
to provide comments containing
proprietary or confidential information,
please contact the agency for alternate
submission instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
research issues: Mr. Garrick
Forkenbrock, Research Engineer,
Vehicle Research and Test Center,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 10820 SR 347, Bldg. 60,
East Liberty, OH 43319. Telephone:
937–666–4511. Email:
garrick.forkenbrock@dot.gov. For legal
issues: Ms. Sara Bennett, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: 202–366–2992. Email:
sara.bennett@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA
seeks comment on the draft research test
procedures listed below, which assess
nine different ADAS technologies. As
background, the agency develops
different test procedures for different
purposes. Most commonly, those test
procedures are for rulemaking, New Car
Assessment Program (NCAP), or
research purposes. This RFC includes
test procedures that have been
developed for research purposes only.
Research test procedures are used by the
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64405
agency to evaluate a technology of
interest and, when presented publicly,
provide a basis from which gaps in test
methodology or other specific
deficiencies may be identified and
resolved. In contrast, rulemaking test
procedures are developed to support
identified rulemaking efforts and, if a
regulation is adopted, focus on ensuring
that a technology meets the level of
performance defined in the regulation
and are used by the agency to determine
compliance. Thus, the fact that NHTSA
is researching a specific technology is
not an indication that it will now or at
any time initiate a rulemaking related to
that technology or include that
technology as part of NCAP. To the
extent that research does inform future
rulemaking efforts or revisions to NCAP,
the agency will appropriately engage the
public through public comment and
other means during those processes.
NHTSA developed the draft test
procedures made available today to
research ways to objectively and
practically assess the performance of
ADAS technologies presently available
to consumers on certain vehicles sold in
the United States. NHTSA highlights
that some of the research test
procedures included in this RFC are in
the early stages of development, while
others are closer to being fully
developed.
For light vehicles, these include:
• Active Parking Assist (APA) 1
• Blind Spot Detection (BSD) 2
• Blind Spot Intervention (BSI) 3
• Intersection Safety Assist (ISA) 4
• Opposing Traffic Safety Assist
(OTSA) 5
• Pedestrian Automatic Emergency
Braking (PAEB) 6
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, August). Active park assist system
confirmation test (DOT HS 812 714). Washington,
DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
2 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2018, June). Blind spot detection system
confirmation test (working draft). Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
3 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, July). Blind spot intervention system
confirmation test (working draft). Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
4 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, September). Intersection safety assist system
confirmation test (working draft). Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
5 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, September). Opposing traffic safety assist
system confirmation test (working draft).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
6 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, April). Pedestrian automatic emergency
brake system confirmation test (working draft).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
64406
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Notices
• Rear Automatic Braking 7
• Traffic Jam Assist (TJA) 8
For heavy vehicles, this includes:
• Forward Collision Warning (FCW) 9
• Automatic Emergency Braking
(AEB) 9
Each draft procedure includes test
scenarios designed to emulate realworld crash-imminent situations, all
performed within the controlled
confines of a test track. To ensure these
tests are objective (i.e., clear about
exactly how they should be executed),
and can be accurately and repeatedly
performed, each draft procedure
contains detailed specifications
pertaining to test conduct including, but
not limited to, the equipment, facilities,
instructions, and tolerances needed to
perform them in the most objective and
consistent manner possible. While the
procedures include draft evaluation
criteria, there are no pass/fail
assessments provided because they have
been assembled for research purposes
only.
NHTSA invites public comment on
each of its draft research ADAS test
procedures. Specifically, the agency
seeks information related to the
following areas of interest. In your
responses, please clearly specify to
which test procedure(s) your comments
apply.
1. Can the test procedures be expected
to assess adequately for the purposes of
research, within practical limitations,
the performance of the underlying
ADAS technologies? If not, please
provide specific reasons why, and
suggestions for how they may be
improved.
2. Do any of the draft research test
procedures contain elements that may
potentially confound the system
operation and/or test results (e.g.,
regarding test conduct)? If so, please
indicate what those elements are and
how they might be addressed and/or
mitigated?
3. Are the draft research test
procedures clearly written,
understandable, and executable? If not,
please provide specific areas for which
clarification is necessary, and
7 National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2015, December). Rear automatic braking feature
confirmation test procedure). Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. NHTSA–2015–
0119–0030.
8 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, June). Traffic jam assist system confirmation
test (working draft). Washington, DC: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
9 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(2019, March). Test track procedures for heavy
vehicle forward collision warning and automatic
emergency braking systems. Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
suggestions for how they may be
improved.
4. Are the ranges of test speeds, speed
combinations, and/or speed increments
specified within each draft research test
procedure reasonable? If not, please
provide any data or evidence to support
any claim of unreasonableness from a
research perspective.
5. To reduce test burden for the
assessment of some technologies for
research purposes, the number of
repeated trials per test condition is
proposed to be less than or equal to
seven based on our experience from past
test procedure design work. Is this
adequate, or should another number of
repeated trials be performed for all
technology/condition combinations to
support an assessment of whether
differences in the test results, for a given
condition, are statistically significant?
6. Are there additional ADAS
technologies NHTSA should be
evaluating for research purposes? If so,
please indicate what they are.
7. Are there existing, alternative test
procedures for the ADAS technologies
identified in this notice that NHTSA
should consider? If so, please identify
them and provide any comparisons/
contrasts that might be useful to the
agency.
Public Participation
How can I be sure that my comments
were received?
If you submit comments by hard copy
and wish Docket Management to notify
you upon its receipt of your comments,
enclose a self-addressed, stamped
postcard in the envelope containing
your comments. Upon receiving your
comments, Docket Management will
return the postcard by mail. If you
submit comments electronically, your
comments should appear automatically
in Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0102 on
www.regulations.gov. If they do not
appear within two weeks of posting,
NHTSA suggested that you call the
Docket Management Facility at (202)
366–9826.
How do I submit confidential business
information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Office of
Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. In addition, you should submit
a copy, from which you have deleted
the claimed confidential business
PO 00000
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you
should include a cover letter setting
forth the information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512)
Will the agency consider late
comments?
In our response, we will consider all
comments that Docket Management
receives before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent
possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management
receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted
by other people?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES. The
hours of the docket are indicated above
in the same location. You may also see
the comments on the internet, at
www.regulations.gov, identified by the
docket number at the heading of this
notice. Please note that, even after the
comment closing date, NHTSA will
continue to file relevant information in
the docket as it becomes available.
Further, some people may submit late
comments. Accordingly, NHTSA
recommends that you periodically
check the docket for new material.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.4.
James Clayton Owens,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–25217 Filed 11–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for [REG–106542–98] T.D.
9032
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Internal Revenue Service,
as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64405-64406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25217]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102]
RIN 2127-ZRIN
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Draft Research Test Procedures
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comments (RFC).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks public comment on a series of nine draft research
test procedures developed by the agency to assess the performance of
certain types of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) available to
consumers. NHTSA is specifically requesting comment on whether these
draft research test procedures adequately, objectively, and practically
assess the system performance of the underlying ADAS in a test track
environment. NHTSA intends to use these draft research test procedures
to further its research goals by using the output from clearly defined
test methods to help better understand system operation, performance,
and potential limitations.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than January 21, 2020.
ADDRESSES:
Documents: The draft research test procedures described in this RFC
are available for viewing in PDF format in Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102.
Comments: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. NHTSA-
2019-0102, by any of the following methods:
Internet: To submit comments electronically, go to the
U.S. Government regulations website at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: Written comments may be faxed to 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: If you submit written comments by hand or
courier, please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may call Docket Management at 1-800-647-5527.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information, see the Public Participation heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records notice, DOT/ALL-14 FDMS, accessible
through https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. To facilitate tracking
and response, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the
name of their organization; however, submission of names is completely
optional. All timely comments will be fully considered, regardless of
whether commenters directly identify themselves. If you wish to provide
comments containing proprietary or confidential information, please
contact the agency for alternate submission instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For research issues: Mr. Garrick
Forkenbrock, Research Engineer, Vehicle Research and Test Center,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 10820 SR 347, Bldg. 60,
East Liberty, OH 43319. Telephone: 937-666-4511. Email:
[email protected]. For legal issues: Ms. Sara Bennett,
Attorney-Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: 202-366-2992. Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA seeks comment on the draft research
test procedures listed below, which assess nine different ADAS
technologies. As background, the agency develops different test
procedures for different purposes. Most commonly, those test procedures
are for rulemaking, New Car Assessment Program (NCAP), or research
purposes. This RFC includes test procedures that have been developed
for research purposes only. Research test procedures are used by the
agency to evaluate a technology of interest and, when presented
publicly, provide a basis from which gaps in test methodology or other
specific deficiencies may be identified and resolved. In contrast,
rulemaking test procedures are developed to support identified
rulemaking efforts and, if a regulation is adopted, focus on ensuring
that a technology meets the level of performance defined in the
regulation and are used by the agency to determine compliance. Thus,
the fact that NHTSA is researching a specific technology is not an
indication that it will now or at any time initiate a rulemaking
related to that technology or include that technology as part of NCAP.
To the extent that research does inform future rulemaking efforts or
revisions to NCAP, the agency will appropriately engage the public
through public comment and other means during those processes.
NHTSA developed the draft test procedures made available today to
research ways to objectively and practically assess the performance of
ADAS technologies presently available to consumers on certain vehicles
sold in the United States. NHTSA highlights that some of the research
test procedures included in this RFC are in the early stages of
development, while others are closer to being fully developed.
For light vehicles, these include:
Active Parking Assist (APA) \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
August). Active park assist system confirmation test (DOT HS 812
714). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blind Spot Detection (BSD) \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2018, June).
Blind spot detection system confirmation test (working draft).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blind Spot Intervention (BSI) \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019, July).
Blind spot intervention system confirmation test (working draft).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intersection Safety Assist (ISA) \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
September). Intersection safety assist system confirmation test
(working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opposing Traffic Safety Assist (OTSA) \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
September). Opposing traffic safety assist system confirmation test
(working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (PAEB) \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
April). Pedestrian automatic emergency brake system confirmation
test (working draft). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64406]]
Rear Automatic Braking \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2015,
December). Rear automatic braking feature confirmation test
procedure). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. www.regulations.gov, Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0119-
0030.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Traffic Jam Assist (TJA) \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019, June).
Traffic jam assist system confirmation test (working draft).
Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For heavy vehicles, this includes:
Forward Collision Warning (FCW) \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2019,
March). Test track procedures for heavy vehicle forward collision
warning and automatic emergency braking systems. Washington, DC:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) \9\
Each draft procedure includes test scenarios designed to emulate
real-world crash-imminent situations, all performed within the
controlled confines of a test track. To ensure these tests are
objective (i.e., clear about exactly how they should be executed), and
can be accurately and repeatedly performed, each draft procedure
contains detailed specifications pertaining to test conduct including,
but not limited to, the equipment, facilities, instructions, and
tolerances needed to perform them in the most objective and consistent
manner possible. While the procedures include draft evaluation
criteria, there are no pass/fail assessments provided because they have
been assembled for research purposes only.
NHTSA invites public comment on each of its draft research ADAS
test procedures. Specifically, the agency seeks information related to
the following areas of interest. In your responses, please clearly
specify to which test procedure(s) your comments apply.
1. Can the test procedures be expected to assess adequately for the
purposes of research, within practical limitations, the performance of
the underlying ADAS technologies? If not, please provide specific
reasons why, and suggestions for how they may be improved.
2. Do any of the draft research test procedures contain elements
that may potentially confound the system operation and/or test results
(e.g., regarding test conduct)? If so, please indicate what those
elements are and how they might be addressed and/or mitigated?
3. Are the draft research test procedures clearly written,
understandable, and executable? If not, please provide specific areas
for which clarification is necessary, and suggestions for how they may
be improved.
4. Are the ranges of test speeds, speed combinations, and/or speed
increments specified within each draft research test procedure
reasonable? If not, please provide any data or evidence to support any
claim of unreasonableness from a research perspective.
5. To reduce test burden for the assessment of some technologies
for research purposes, the number of repeated trials per test condition
is proposed to be less than or equal to seven based on our experience
from past test procedure design work. Is this adequate, or should
another number of repeated trials be performed for all technology/
condition combinations to support an assessment of whether differences
in the test results, for a given condition, are statistically
significant?
6. Are there additional ADAS technologies NHTSA should be
evaluating for research purposes? If so, please indicate what they are.
7. Are there existing, alternative test procedures for the ADAS
technologies identified in this notice that NHTSA should consider? If
so, please identify them and provide any comparisons/contrasts that
might be useful to the agency.
Public Participation
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
If you submit comments by hard copy and wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by
mail. If you submit comments electronically, your comments should
appear automatically in Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0102 on
www.regulations.gov. If they do not appear within two weeks of posting,
NHTSA suggested that you call the Docket Management Facility at (202)
366-9826.
How do I submit confidential business information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Office of Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have
deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket
Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a
comment containing information claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the
information specified in our confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512)
Will the agency consider late comments?
In our response, we will consider all comments that Docket
Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing
date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also
consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the docket are
indicated above in the same location. You may also see the comments on
the internet, at www.regulations.gov, identified by the docket number
at the heading of this notice. Please note that, even after the comment
closing date, NHTSA will continue to file relevant information in the
docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late
comments. Accordingly, NHTSA recommends that you periodically check the
docket for new material.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.4.
James Clayton Owens,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-25217 Filed 11-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P