Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 59355-59356 [2019-24044]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2019 / Notices
exist with respect to imports of collated
staples from China shipped by Best
Nail, Xin Group, Ningbo Deli, and all
other producers and exporters.
Final Critical Circumstances
Determinations
We will issue our final determinations
concerning critical circumstances when
we issue our final CVD and AD
determinations. All interested parties
will have the opportunity to address
these determinations in case briefs to be
submitted after the issuance of the
preliminary CVD and AD
determinations. Commerce will specify
the applicable deadlines at a later date.
ITC Notification
In accordance with sections 703(f)
and 733(f) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of these preliminary determinations
of critical circumstances.
Suspension of Liquidation
In accordance with section 703(e)(2)
of the Act, because we have
preliminarily found that critical
circumstances exist with regard to
imports from all producers and
exporters of collated staples from China,
if we make an affirmative preliminary
determination that countervailable
subsidies have been provided to these
same producers/exporters at above de
minimis rates, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
suspend liquidation of all entries of
subject merchandise from these
producers/exporters that are entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, on or after the date that is
90 days prior to the effective date of
provisional measures (e.g., the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of an affirmative preliminary
determination that countervailable
subsidies have been provided at above
de minimis rates). At such time, we will
also instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the estimated
preliminary subsidy rates reflected in
the preliminary determination
published in the Federal Register. The
suspension of liquidation will remain in
effect until further notice.
In accordance with section 733(e)(2)
of the Act, because we have
preliminarily found that critical
circumstances exist with regard to
imports from certain producers and
exporters of collated staples from China,
if we make an affirmative preliminary
determination that sales at LTFV have
been made by these same producers/
exporters at above de minimis rates, we
will instruct CBP to suspend liquidation
of all entries of subject merchandise
from these producers/exporters that are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:48 Nov 01, 2019
Jkt 250001
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date that
is 90 days prior to the effective date of
provisional measures (e.g., the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of an affirmative preliminary
determination of sales at LTFV at above
de minimis rates). At such time, we will
also instruct CBP to require a cash
deposit equal to the estimated
preliminary dumping margins reflected
in the preliminary determination
published in the Federal Register. The
suspension of liquidation will remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Interested Parties
These determinations are issued and
published pursuant to section 777(i)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206(c)(2).
Dated: October 24, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–23732 Filed 11–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–824, A–583–837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From India and Taiwan: Final
Results of the Expedited Third Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited
sunset reviews, Commerce finds that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders would be likely to lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the levels indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable November 4, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2019, Commerce published
the notice of initiation of the third
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty
orders on polyethylene terephthalate
film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59355
India and Taiwan 1 pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act.2 On July 11, 2019, and
July 16, 2019, Commerce received
notices of intent to participate from the
petitioners 3 and Terphane LLC
(Terphane), respectively.4 Each filing
was timely submitted within the 15-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners and
Terphane each claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act
as a producer of PET Film in the United
States.
On July 31, 2019, Commerce received
adequate substantive responses to the
notice of initiation from the petitioners
as well as from Terphane, a
manufacturer of domestic like product,
within the 30-day deadline specified in
19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).5 On July 31,
2019, Polyplex USA LLC, (Polyplex
USA), a domestic interested party, filed
a notice of appearance and a substantive
response.6 We received no substantive
responses from respondent interested
parties with respect to either of the
orders covered by these sunset reviews.
On September 3, 2019, Commerce
notified the U.S. International Trade
1 See Notice of Amended Final: Antidumping
Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67
FR 44175 (July 1, 2002) (Antidumping Duty Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84
FR 31304 (July 1 2019).
3 The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films,
Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc.
4 See Petitioners’ Letters, ‘‘Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
India: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset
Review,’’ dated July 11; 2019; and ‘‘Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
Taiwan: Notice of Intent to Participate in Sunset
Review, ‘‘dated July 11, 2019; Terphane’s Letter,
‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping
Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet, And Strip from India: Notice of Intent to
Participate,’’ dated July 16, 2019;’’ see also
Terphane’s Letter, ‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of
Antidumping Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate
(PET) Film, Sheet, And Strip from Taiwan: Notice
of Intent to Participate,’’ dated July 16, 2019.
5 See Petitioners’ Letters, Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
India: Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation,’’ dated July 31, 2019 (Petitioners’ India
Substantive Response); and, Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
Taiwan: Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation,’’ dated July 31, 2019 (Petitioners’ Taiwan
Substantive Response); see alsoTerphane’s Letter,
‘‘Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of Antidumping
Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet, And Strip from India And Taiwan, and
Countervailing Duty Order on PET Film, Sheet, And
Strip from India: Terphane’s Substantive Response,
’’ dated July 31, 2019 (Terphane’s Substantive
Response).
6 See Polyplex USA LLC’s notice of appearance,
dated July 31, 2019; see also Polyplex USA LLC’s
Letter, ‘‘Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film
from India and Taiwan: Response to the Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews and
Support for Continuation of the Orders,’’ dated July
31, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
59356
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 213 / Monday, November 4, 2019 / Notices
Commission that it did not receive an
adequate substantive response from
respondent interested parties.7 As a
result, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is
conducting expedited (120-day) sunset
reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on PET Film from India and Taiwan.
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by this Order is
PET Film and is currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) under item
number 3920.62.00.90. A full
description of the scope of the Order is
contained in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum.8
Analysis of Comments Received 9
All issues raised in these sunset
reviews are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum,10 which is
hereby adopted by this notice. The
issues discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence
of dumping and the magnitude of the
dumping margin likely to prevail if the
orders were revoked. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and to all in the
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
the main Commerce building. A list of
topics discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum is included as
an Appendix to this notice. In addition,
a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
7 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews
Initiated on July 1, 2019,’’ dated September 3, 2019.
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset
Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip
from India and Taiwan,’’ dated concurrently with
this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
9 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) states that where a
domestic interested party intends to participate in
a sunset review, it must file a notice of intent to
participate with Commerce within 15 days after the
publications of the notice of initiation. As noted
above, Polyplex USA untimely filed its notice of
appearance on July 31, 2019. 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A) states that Commerce will not
accept or consider any unsolicited submissions
from that party during the course of the review.
Accordingly, we have not considered Polyplex
USA’s submissions.
10 See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:48 Nov 01, 2019
Jkt 250001
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on PET Film
from India and Taiwan would be likely
to lead to the continuation or recurrence
of dumping at weighted-average
dumping margins up to 24.10 percent
for India and 8.99 percent for Taiwan.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c),
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218.
Dated: October 29, 2019.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–24044 Filed 11–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
C–533–825
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From India: Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset
Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited
sunset review, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) finds that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order on polyethylene terephthalate
film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from
India would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies as indicated
in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset Review’’
section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable November 4, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0197.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On July 1, 2019, Commerce published
the initiation of the five-year (sunset)
review of the countervailing duty order
on PET film from India, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).1 Commerce
received notices of intent to participate
in this sunset review from DuPont
Teijin Films, Mitsubishi Polyester Film,
Inc., SKC, Inc., and Terphane LLC
(collectively, domestic interested
parties), within the 15-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).
The domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act as producers of the
domestic like product.
Commerce received adequate
substantive responses to the Notice of
Initiation from the domestic interested
parties within the 30-day period
specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
Commerce received no substantive
response from any respondent
interested parties. In accordance with
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited (120-day)
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84
FR 31304 (July 1, 2019).
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59355-59356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24044]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-824, A-583-837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From India and
Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of these expedited sunset reviews, Commerce finds
that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would be likely to lead
to the continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in
the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Applicable November 4, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 1, 2019, Commerce published the notice of initiation of the
third sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from India and Taiwan
\1\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.\2\ On July 11, 2019, and
July 16, 2019, Commerce received notices of intent to participate from
the petitioners \3\ and Terphane LLC (Terphane), respectively.\4\ Each
filing was timely submitted within the 15-day deadline specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The petitioners and Terphane each claimed
interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act as a
producer of PET Film in the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Amended Final: Antidumping Duty Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order:
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from India, 67 FR
44175 (July 1, 2002) (Antidumping Duty Order).
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 31304
(July 1 2019).
\3\ The petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., and SKC, Inc.
\4\ See Petitioners' Letters, ``Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Notice of Intent to Participate
in Sunset Review,'' dated July 11; 2019; and ``Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan: Notice of
Intent to Participate in Sunset Review, ``dated July 11, 2019;
Terphane's Letter, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review of Antidumping
Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, And Strip
from India: Notice of Intent to Participate,'' dated July 16,
2019;'' see also Terphane's Letter, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review
of Antidumping Order on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet, And Strip from Taiwan: Notice of Intent to Participate,''
dated July 16, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 31, 2019, Commerce received adequate substantive responses
to the notice of initiation from the petitioners as well as from
Terphane, a manufacturer of domestic like product, within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).\5\ On July 31, 2019,
Polyplex USA LLC, (Polyplex USA), a domestic interested party, filed a
notice of appearance and a substantive response.\6\ We received no
substantive responses from respondent interested parties with respect
to either of the orders covered by these sunset reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Petitioners' Letters, Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
Film, Sheet, and Strip from India: Substantive Response to the
Notice of Initiation,'' dated July 31, 2019 (Petitioners' India
Substantive Response); and, Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Film,
Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan: Substantive Response to the Notice of
Initiation,'' dated July 31, 2019 (Petitioners' Taiwan Substantive
Response); see alsoTerphane's Letter, ``Five-Year (``Sunset'')
Review of Antidumping Orders on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET)
Film, Sheet, And Strip from India And Taiwan, and Countervailing
Duty Order on PET Film, Sheet, And Strip from India: Terphane's
Substantive Response, '' dated July 31, 2019 (Terphane's Substantive
Response).
\6\ See Polyplex USA LLC's notice of appearance, dated July 31,
2019; see also Polyplex USA LLC's Letter, ``Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film from India and Taiwan: Response to the
Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews and Support for
Continuation of the Orders,'' dated July 31, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 3, 2019, Commerce notified the U.S. International
Trade
[[Page 59356]]
Commission that it did not receive an adequate substantive response
from respondent interested parties.\7\ As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce is conducting expedited (120-day)
sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on PET Film from India
and Taiwan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Sunset Reviews Initiated on July 1,
2019,'' dated September 3, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The products covered by this Order is PET Film and is currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. A full description of the
scope of the Order is contained in the accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip from India and
Taiwan,'' dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) states that where a domestic
interested party intends to participate in a sunset review, it must
file a notice of intent to participate with Commerce within 15 days
after the publications of the notice of initiation. As noted above,
Polyplex USA untimely filed its notice of appearance on July 31,
2019. 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii)(A) states that Commerce will not
accept or consider any unsolicited submissions from that party
during the course of the review. Accordingly, we have not considered
Polyplex USA's submissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All issues raised in these sunset reviews are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum,\10\ which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the
magnitude of the dumping margin likely to prevail if the orders were
revoked. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and
to all in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum is included as an Appendix to this notice. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act,
Commerce determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on
PET Film from India and Taiwan would be likely to lead to the
continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average dumping
margins up to 24.10 percent for India and 8.99 percent for Taiwan.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which
is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the final results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and
19 CFR 351.218.
Dated: October 29, 2019.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
1. Likelihood of Continuation or Recurrence of Dumping
2. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Review
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019-24044 Filed 11-1-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P