High Pressure Steel Cylinders From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: 2018, 57397-57398 [2019-23336]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices
to or hung from a desktop or other work
surface such as holes punched in the top (i.e.,
not freestanding); or (2) freestanding file
cabinets that have all of the following: (a) At
least a 90 percent drawer extension for all
extendable file storage elements; (b) a central
locking system; (c) a minimum weight
density of 9.5 lbs./cubic foot; and (d) casters
or leveling glides.
‘‘Percentage drawer extension’’ is defined
as the drawer travel distance divided by the
inside depth dimension of the drawer. Inside
depth of drawer is measured from the inside
of the drawer face to the inside face of the
drawer back. Drawer extension is the
distance the drawer travels from the closed
position to the maximum travel position
which is limited by the out stops. In
situations where drawers do not include an
outstop, the drawer is extended until the
drawer back is 31⁄2 inches from the closed
position of inside face of the drawer front.
The ‘‘weight density’’ is calculated by
dividing the cabinet’s actual weight by its
volume in cubic feet (the multiple of the
product’s actual width, depth, and height). A
‘‘central locking system’’ locks all drawers in
a unit.
Also excluded from the scope are fire proof
or fire-resistant file cabinets that meet
Underwriters Laboratories (UL) fire
protection standard 72, class 350, which
covers the test procedures applicable to fireresistant equipment intended to protect
paper records.
The merchandise subject to the
investigation is classified under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheading 9403.10.0020. The subject
merchandise may also enter under HTSUS
subheadings 9403.10.0040, 9403.20.0080,
and 9403.20.0090. While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the investigation
is dispositive.
Appendix II
Appendix IV
List of Companies Receiving All-Others Rate
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Period of Investigation
IV. Scope of Investigation
V. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
VI. Discussion of the Issues
VII. Recommendation
Appendix III
List of Non-Responsive Companies Receiving
AFA Rate
1. Best Beauty Furniture Co., Ltd.
2. Chung Wah Steel Furniture Factory
3. Concept Furniture (Anhui) Co., Ltd.
4. Dong Guan Shing Fai Furniture
5. Dongguan Zhisheng Furniture Co., Ltd.
6. Feel Life Co., Ltd.
7. Fujian lvyer Industrial Co., Ltd.
8. Fuzhou Nu Deco Crafts Co., Ltd.
9. Fuzhou Yibang Furniture Co., Ltd.
10. Gold Future Furnishing Co., Ltd.
11. Guangdong Hongye Furniture
12. Guangxi Gicon Office Furniture Co., Ltd.
13. Guangzhou City Yunrui Imp.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14. Hangzhou Zongda Co., Ltd.
15. Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd.
16. Highbright Enterprise Ltd.
17. Homestar Corp.
18. Honghui Wooden Crafts Co., Ltd.
19. Huabao Steel Appliance Co., Ltd.
20. I.D. International Inc.
21. Jiangmen Kinwai International
22. Jiaxing Haihong Electromechanical
Technology Co., Ltd.
23. Long Sheng Office Furniture
24. Louyong Hua Zhi Jie Office Furniture Co.,
Ltd.
25. Luoyang Hua Wei Office Furniture Co.,
Ltd.
26. Luoyang Huadu Imp. Exp. Co., Ltd.
27. Luoyang Mas Younger Office Furniture
Co., Ltd.
28. Luoyang Shidiu Import & Export Co., Ltd.
29. Luoyang Zhenhai Furniture Co., Ltd.
30. Ningbo Sunburst International Trading
Co., Ltd.
31. Ri Time Group Inc. (Szx)
32. Shenzhen Heng Li de Industry Co., Ltd.
33. Shenzhen Zhijuan (Zhiyuan) Technology
Co., Ltd.
34. Shiny Way Furniture Co., Ltd.
35. South Metal Furniture Factory
36. Suzhou Jie Quan (Jinyuan) Trading Co.,
Ltd.
37. T. H. I. Group (Shanghai) Ltd.
38. Tianjin First Wood Co., Ltd.
39. UenJoy (Tianjin) Technology Co., Ltd.
40. Xiamen Extreme Creations
41. Xinhui Second Light Machinery Factory
Co., Ltd
42. Yahee Technologies
43. Zhe Jiang Jiayang Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
44. Zhejiang Ue Furniture Co., Ltd.
45. Zhong Shan Yue Qin Imp. & Exp.
46. Zhongshan Fmarts Furniture Co., Ltd
18:04 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 250001
The companies receiving the all-others rate
include:
1. Guangzhou Perfect Office Furniture
2. Guangzhou Textiles Holdings Limited
3. Huisen Furniture (Longnan) Co., Ltd.
4. Invention Global Ltd.
5. Jiangxi Yuanjin Science & Technology
Group Co., Ltd.
6. Jpc Co., Ltd. (HK)
7. Leder Lighting Co., Ltd.
8. Luoyang Cuide Imp. & Exp.
9. Ningbo Haishu Spark Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.
10. Ningbo Haitian International Co.
11. Qingdao Liansheng
12. Shanxi Ktl Agricultural Technology Co.,
Ltd.
13. Shanxi Sijian Group Co., Ltd.
14. Shenzhen Zhilai Sci and Tech Co., Ltd.
15. Top Perfect Ltd.
16. Zhengzhou Puhui Trading Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2019–23338 Filed 10–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57397
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–978]
High Pressure Steel Cylinders From
the People’s Republic of China:
Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review: 2018
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain high pressure steel cylinders
(steel cylinders) from the People’s
Republic of China (China) for the period
of review (POR) January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018, based on the timely
withdrawal of the requests for review.
DATES: Applicable October 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On June 3, 2019, Commerce published
a notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the CVD order
on steel cylinders from China for the
POR of January 1, 2018, through
December 31, 2018.1 Commerce
received a timely-filed request from
Norris Cylinder Company (Norris) for an
administrative review of Beijing Tianhai
Industry Co., Ltd. (BTIC), Tianjin
Tianhai High Pressure Container Co.,
Ltd. (Tianjin Tianhai), and Langfang
Tianhai High Pressure Container Co.,
Ltd. (Langfang Tianhai) and a request
from BTIC for a review of itself, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.213(b).2
On July 29, 2019, pursuant to these
requests and in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a
notice initiating an administrative
review of the countervailing duty order
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 25521
(June 3, 2019).
2 See letter from Norris, ‘‘High Pressure Steel
Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China;
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated June 24,
2019, and BTIC, ‘‘Request for the Seventh
Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the
People’s Republic of China, C–570–978 (POR: 01/
01/18–12/31/18),’’ dated June 27, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
57398
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices
on steel cylinders from China with
respect to BTIC, Tianjin Tianhai, and
Langfang Tianhai.3 On October 1, 2019,
Norris and BTIC withdrew their
requests for an administrative review.4
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party or parties that
requested a review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of
initiation of the requested review.
Norris withdrew its request for review
of BTIC, Langfang Tianhai High
Pressure Container, and Tianjin Tianhai
High Pressure Container, and BTIC
withdrew its request for review of itself.
Both parties withdrew their requests
within 90 days of the publication date
of the notice of initiation. No other
parties requested an administrative
review of the order. Therefore, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
we are rescinding this review in its
entirety.
Assessment
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
countervailing duties on all appropriate
entries of HPSC from China.
Countervailing duties shall be assessed
at rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated countervailing duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to
issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to all parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
36572 (July 29, 2019).
4 See letter from Norris, ‘‘High Pressure Steel
Cylinders from the People’s Republic of China;
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’
and BTIC, ‘‘Withdrawal of Review Request in the
Seventh Administrative Review of Countervailing
Duty Order on High Pressure Steel Cylinders from
the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated October 1,
2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:04 Oct 24, 2019
Jkt 250001
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Period of Investigation
Dated: October 21, 2019.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is file cabinets from China.
For a complete discussion of the scope
of this investigation, see the Appendix
to this notice.
[FR Doc. 2019–23336 Filed 10–24–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
International Trade Administration
[A–570–110]
Vertical Metal File Cabinets From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that vertical
metal file cabinets (file cabinets) from
the People’s Republic of China (China)
are being, or are likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value
(LTFV).
DATES: Applicable October 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathryn Wallace, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6251.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 1, 2019, Commerce
published its Preliminary Determination
of sales at LTFV of file cabinets from
China and gave parties an opportunity
to comment.1 Commerce received no
comments or requests for a hearing. As
there are no changes from, or comments
upon, the Preliminary Determination,
Commerce finds that there is no reason
to modify its analysis. Accordingly, no
decision memorandum accompanies
this Federal Register notice. For further
details of the issues addressed in this
proceeding, see the Preliminary
Determination.2
1 See Vertical Metal File Cabinets from the
Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 84
FR 37618 (August 1, 2019) (Preliminary
Determination), and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
2 See Preliminary Determination, 84 FR at 37618.
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Scope of the Investigation
Separate Rates
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
PO 00000
The period of investigation (POI) is
October 1, 2017 through March 31,
2018.
Sfmt 4703
As no company subject to this
investigation submitted an application
for separate rate status, Commerce
preliminarily determined that none of
the companies subject to this
investigation demonstrated eligibility
for separate rate status and were thus
found to be part of the China-wide
entity.3 In this final determination, we
continue to treat all 62 exporters or
producers subject to this investigation
as part of the China-wide entity.4
China-Wide Entity
As explained in the Preliminary
Determination, Commerce did not
receive timely responses to its quantity
and value (Q&V) questionnaire from
exporters and/or producers of subject
merchandise that were named in the
petition and to which Commerce issued
Q&V questionnaires.5 As noted above,
these non-responsive companies also
did not demonstrate separate rate
eligibility, and accordingly, were
determined to be a part of the Chinawide entity. Furthermore, as explained
in the Preliminary Determination, the
China-wide entity failed to provide
necessary information, withheld
information requested by Commerce,
failed to provide information in a timely
manner, and significantly impeded this
proceeding by not submitting the
requested information. Moreover, the
China-wide entity was found to be noncooperative.6 Thus, we continue to find
that the use of adverse facts available
(AFA) pursuant to section 776(a)–(b) of
the Act is appropriate, and we are
continuing to base the China-wide
entity’s rate on AFA.
China-Wide Rate
In selecting the AFA rate for the
China-wide entity, Commerce’s practice
is to select a rate that is sufficiently
adverse to ensure that the uncooperative
party does not obtain a more favorable
result by failing to cooperate than if it
3 Id.
4 Id.
5 See
6 Id.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 6.
at 6–7.
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57397-57398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-978]
High Pressure Steel Cylinders From the People's Republic of
China: Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: 2018
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain
high pressure steel cylinders (steel cylinders) from the People's
Republic of China (China) for the period of review (POR) January 1,
2018 through December 31, 2018, based on the timely withdrawal of the
requests for review.
DATES: Applicable October 25, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations, Office
I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-5075.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 3, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the CVD order on steel cylinders
from China for the POR of January 1, 2018, through December 31,
2018.\1\ Commerce received a timely-filed request from Norris Cylinder
Company (Norris) for an administrative review of Beijing Tianhai
Industry Co., Ltd. (BTIC), Tianjin Tianhai High Pressure Container Co.,
Ltd. (Tianjin Tianhai), and Langfang Tianhai High Pressure Container
Co., Ltd. (Langfang Tianhai) and a request from BTIC for a review of
itself, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative
Review, 84 FR 25521 (June 3, 2019).
\2\ See letter from Norris, ``High Pressure Steel Cylinders from
the People's Republic of China; Request for Administrative Review,''
dated June 24, 2019, and BTIC, ``Request for the Seventh
Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on High
Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People's Republic of China, C-570-
978 (POR: 01/01/18-12/31/18),'' dated June 27, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 29, 2019, pursuant to these requests and in accordance with
19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce published a notice initiating an
administrative review of the countervailing duty order
[[Page 57398]]
on steel cylinders from China with respect to BTIC, Tianjin Tianhai,
and Langfang Tianhai.\3\ On October 1, 2019, Norris and BTIC withdrew
their requests for an administrative review.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 36572 (July 29, 2019).
\4\ See letter from Norris, ``High Pressure Steel Cylinders from
the People's Republic of China; Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review,'' and BTIC, ``Withdrawal of Review Request in
the Seventh Administrative Review of Countervailing Duty Order on
High Pressure Steel Cylinders from the People's Republic of China,''
dated October 1, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party or parties
that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the
publication date of the notice of initiation of the requested review.
Norris withdrew its request for review of BTIC, Langfang Tianhai High
Pressure Container, and Tianjin Tianhai High Pressure Container, and
BTIC withdrew its request for review of itself. Both parties withdrew
their requests within 90 days of the publication date of the notice of
initiation. No other parties requested an administrative review of the
order. Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are
rescinding this review in its entirety.
Assessment
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of HPSC from
China. Countervailing duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties required at the time of
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of
this notice in the Federal Register.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder to all parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of
the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: October 21, 2019.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2019-23336 Filed 10-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P