Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Make Permanent Certain Options Market Rules That Are Linked to the Equity Market Plan To Address Extraordinary Market Volatility, 57509-57513 [2019-23254]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices with the Plan, should be amended to operate on a permanent basis. The Exchange understands that the other national securities exchanges will also file similar proposals to make permanent their respective pilot programs. Thus, the proposed rule change will help to ensure consistency across market centers without implicating any competitive issues. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 13 and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder.14 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 15 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 16 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as it will allow the current Options Pilots to continue on a permanent basis without any changes, prior to the pilot expiration on October 18, 2019. For this reason, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 14 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Oct 24, 2019 Jkt 250001 57509 proposed rule change as operative upon filing.17 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BOX–2019–31 and should be submitted on or before November 15, 2019. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.18 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– BOX–2019–31 on the subject line. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BOX–2019–31. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 17 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2019–23261 Filed 10–24–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [Release No. 34–87368; File No. SR–BX– 2019–038] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Make Permanent Certain Options Market Rules That Are Linked to the Equity Market Plan To Address Extraordinary Market Volatility October 21, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 18, 2019, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to make permanent certain options market rules that are linked to the equity market Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at 18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 57510 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to make permanent certain options market rules in connection with the equity market Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Plan’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’). This change is being proposed in connection with the recently approved amendment to the Limit UpLimit Down Plan that allows the Plan to continue to operate on a permanent basis (‘‘Amendment 18’’).3 This proposed rule change is substantially similar to a recently-approved rule change by Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’).4 In an attempt to address extraordinary market volatility in NMS Stocks, and, in particular, events like the severe volatility on May 6, 2010, U.S. national securities exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Participants’’) drafted the Plan pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS and under the Act.5 On May 31, 2012, the Commission approved the Plan, as amended, on a one-year pilot 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11, 2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (Order Approving Amendment No. 18). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 86744 (August 23, 2019), 84 FR 45565 (August 29, 2019) (SR–CBOE–2019–049) (Notice of Filing); and 87311 (October 15, 2019) (SR–CBOE–2019–049) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2). The Exchange understands that the other national securities exchanges will also file similar proposals to make permanent their respective pilot programs. 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25, 2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1, 2011) (File No. 4–631). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Oct 24, 2019 Jkt 250001 basis.6 Though the Plan was primarily designed for equity markets, the Exchange believed it would, indirectly, potentially impact the options markets as well. Thus, the Exchange has previously adopted and amended Chapter V, Section 3(d) to ensure the option markets were not harmed as a result of the Plan’s implementation and has implemented such rules on a pilot basis that has coincided with the pilot period for the Plan (the ‘‘Options Pilots’’).7 Chapter V, Section 3(d) addresses the interplay of the Exchange’s rules in response to the Plan, and includes provisions on how the Exchange will treat certain options orders during a limit or straddle state as well as options market maker quoting obligations during a limit or straddle state. In addition, Section 3(d)(iv) provides that during a limit or straddle state, trades are not subject to obvious or catastrophic error review. A limit or straddle state occurs when at least one side of the National Best Bid (‘‘NBB’’) or Offer (‘‘NBO’’) bid/ask is priced at a non-tradable level. Specifically, a straddle state exists when the NBB is below the lower price band while the NBO is inside the prices band or when the NBO is above the upper price band and the NBB is within the band, while a limit state occurs when the NBO equals the lower price band (without crossing the NBB), or the NBB equals the upper price band (without crossing the NBO). The Exchange adopted the Options Pilots to protect investors because when an underlying security is in a limit up-limit down state, there will not be a reliable price for the security to serve as a benchmark for the price of the option. Specifically, the Exchange adopted Chapter V, Section 3(d)(iv) because the application of the obvious and catastrophic error rules would be impracticable given the potential for lack of a reliable NBBO in the options market during limit and straddle states. When adjusting or busting a trade pursuant to the obvious error rule, the determination of theoretical value of a trade generally references the NBB (for erroneous sell transactions) or NBO (for erroneous buy transactions) just prior to the trade in question, and is therefore not reliable when at least one side of the NBBO is priced at a non-tradeable level, as is the case in limit and straddle states. In such a situation, determining 6 See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69119 (March 12, 2013), 78 FR 16746 (March 18, 2013) (SR–BX–2013–021); 69334 (April 5, 2013), 78 FR 21653 (April 11, 2013) (SR–BX–2013–022); and 69343 (April 8, 2013), 78 FR 21982 (April 12, 2013) (SR–BX–2013–026). PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 theoretical value may often times be a very subjective rather than an objective determination and could give rise to additional uncertainty and confusion for investors. As a result, application of the obvious and catastrophic error rules would be impracticable given the lack of a reliable NBBO in the options market during limit and straddle states, and may produce undesirable effects or unanticipated consequences. As noted above, the Exchange adopted additional measures via other Options Pilot rules that are designed to protect investors during limit and straddle states.8 For example, the Exchange will reject Market Orders (as defined in Chapter VI, Section 1) during a Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure that only those orders with a limit price will be executed during a limit or straddle state given the uncertainty of market prices during such a state. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that eliminating the application of obvious error rules during a limit or straddle state eliminates the re-evaluation of a transaction executed during such a state that could potentially create an unreasonable adverse selection opportunity due to the lack of a reliable reference price on one side of the market or another and discourage participants from providing liquidity during limit and straddle states, which is contrary to the goal in limiting participants’ adverse selection with the application of the obvious error rule during normal trading states. For these reasons, the Exchange believes the Options Pilots and related rules are designed to add certainty on the options markets, which encourages more investors to participate in light of the changes associated with the Plan. The Plan was originally implemented on a pilot-basis in order to allow the public, the participating exchanges, and the Commission to assess the operation of the Plan and whether the Plan should be modified prior to approval on a permanent basis. As stated, the Exchange adopted the Option Pilots to coincide with this pilot; to continue the protections therein while the industry gains further experience operating the Plan. In connection with the order approving the establishment of the obvious error pilot, as well as the extensions of the obvious error pilot, the Exchange committed to submit monthly data regarding the program and to submit an overall analysis of the obvious error pilot in conjunction with 8 As set forth in Chapter V, Section 3(d), this includes rules in connection with special handling for Market Orders, and options market maker quoting obligations during a limit or straddle state. E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices the data submitted under the Plan and any other data as requested by the Commission. Pursuant to a rule filing, approved on April 8, 2014, each month, the Exchange committed to provide the Commission, and the public, a dataset containing the data for each straddle and limit state in optionable stocks that had at least one trade on the Exchange.9 The Exchange has continued to provide the Commission with this data on a monthly basis. For each trade on the Exchange, the Exchange provides (a) the stock symbol, option symbol, time at the start of the straddle or limit state, an indicator for whether it is a straddle or limit state, and (b) for the trades on the Exchange, the executed volume, timeweighted quoted bid-ask spread, timeweighted average quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted average quoted depth at the offer, high execution price, low execution price, number of trades for which a request for review for error was received during straddle and limit states, an indicator variable for whether those options outlined above have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying stock’s limit or straddle state compared to the last available option price as reported by OPRA before the start of the limit or straddle state. In addition, to help evaluate the impact of the pilot program, the Exchange has provided to the Commission, and the public, assessments relating to the impact of the operation of the obvious error rules during limit and straddle states including: (1) An evaluation of the statistical and economic impact of limit and straddle states on liquidity and market quality in the options markets, and (2) an assessment of whether the lack of obvious error rules in effect during the straddle and limit states are problematic. The Exchange has concluded that the Options Pilots do not negatively impact market quality during normal market conditions,10 and that there has been insufficient data to assess whether a lack of obvious error rules is problematic, however, the Exchange believes the continuation of the Options Pilots function to protect against any unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a limit or 9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71900 (April 8, 2014), 79 FR 20951 (April 14, 2014) (SR– BX–2014–017); see also BX LULD Reports, available at: https://www.nasdaq.com/solutions/options/ LULD. 10 See also BX LULD Reports, available at: https:// www.nasdaq.com/solutions/options/LULD. During the most recent Review Period the Exchange did not receive any obvious error review requests for LimitUp-Limit Down trades, and Limit Up-Limit Down trade volume accounted for nominal overall trade volume. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Oct 24, 2019 Jkt 250001 straddle state and add certainty on the options markets. The Commission recently approved the Plan on a permanent basis (Amendment 18).11 In connection with this approval, the Exchange now proposes to amend Chapter V, Section 3(d) that currently implement provisions of the Plan on a pilot basis to eliminate the pilot basis, which effectiveness expires on October 18, 2019, and to make such rules permanent. In its approval order to make the Plan permanent, the Commission recognized that, as a result of the Participants’ and industry analysis of the Plan’s operation, the Limit Up-Limit Down mechanism effectively addresses extraordinary market volatility. Indeed, the Plan benefits markets and market participants by helping to ensure orderly markets, but also, the Exchange believes, based on the data made available to the public and the Commission during the pilot period, that the obvious error pilot does not negatively impact market quality during normal market conditions.12 Rather, the Exchange believes the obvious error pilot functions to protect against any unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a limit or straddle state and add certainty on the options markets. The Exchange also believes the other Options Pilots rules provide additional measures designed to protect investors during limit and straddle states. For example, the Exchange will reject Market Orders during a Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure that only those orders with a limit price will be executed during a limit or straddle state given the uncertainty of market prices during such a state.13 This removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and national market system by encouraging more investors to participate in light of the changes associated with the Plan. The Exchange believes that if approved on a permanent basis, the Options Pilots would permanently provide investors with the above-described additional certainty of market prices and mitigation of unanticipated consequences and unreasonable adverse selection risk during limit and straddle states. Since the Commission’s approval of Amendment 18 allowing the Plan to operate on a permanent basis, the Exchange and other national securities 11 See supra note 3. supra note 10. 13 See supra note 8. 12 See PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57511 exchanges have determined that no further amendments should be made to the Options Pilots; 14 the current Options Pilots effectively address extraordinary market volatility, are reasonably designed to comply with the requirements of the Plan, facilitate compliance with the Plan and should now operate on a permanent basis, consistent with the Plan. The Exchange does not propose any substantive or additional changes to Chapter V, Section 3(d). 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,15 in general, and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,16 in particular, in that it is designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest and not to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule supports the objectives of perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and the national market system because it promotes transparency and uniformity across markets concerning rules for options markets adopted to coincide with the Plan. The Exchange believes that eliminating the pilot basis for the Options Pilots and making such rules permanent facilitates compliance with the Plan by adding certainty to the markets during periods of market volatility, which has been approved and found by the Commission to be reasonably designed to prevent potentially harmful price volatility in NMS Stocks. It has been determined by the Commission that the Plan benefits markets and market participants by helping to ensure orderly markets, and, based on the data made available to the public and the Commission during the pilot period for Chapter V, Section 3(d)(iv), the Plan does not negatively impact options market quality during normal market conditions. Rather, the Plan, as it is implemented under the obvious error pilot, functions to protect against any unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a limit or straddle state and add certainty on the options markets. During a limit or 14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85622 (April 11, 2019), 84 FR 16116 (April 17, 2019) (SR– BX–2019–007). 15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 16 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 57512 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices straddle state, determining theoretical value of an option may be a subjective rather than an objective determination given the lack of a reliable NBBO, which may create an unreasonable adverse selection opportunity and discourage participants from providing liquidity during limit and straddle states. Therefore, the Exchange believes eliminating obvious error review in such states would, in turn, eliminate uncertainty and confusion for investors and benefit investors by encouraging more participation in light of the changes associated with the Plan. As stated, the Exchange believes the other Options Pilots rules provide additional measures designed to protect investors during limit and straddle states. For example, the Exchange will reject Market Orders during a Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure that only those orders with a limit price will be executed during a limit or straddle state given the uncertainty of market prices during such a state.17 Accordingly, the Exchange believes that making the Options Pilots permanent will further the goals of investor protection and fair and orderly markets as the rules effectively address extraordinary market volatility pursuant to the Plan. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is necessary to reflect that the Plan no longer operates as a pilot and has been approved to operate on a permanent basis by the Commission. As such, Chapter V, Section 3(d), which implement protections in connection with the Plan, should be amended to operate on a permanent basis. The Exchange understands that the other national securities exchanges will also file similar proposals to make permanent their respective pilot programs.18 Thus, the proposed rule change will help to ensure consistency across market centers without implicating any competitive issues. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. 17 See supra note 8. addition, the Exchange’s proposal is substantially similar to Cboe’s recently approved rule change. See supra note 4. 18 In VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Oct 24, 2019 Jkt 250001 III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 19 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.20 A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 21 normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 22 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as it will allow the current Options Pilots to continue on a permanent basis without any changes, prior to the pilot expiration on October 18, 2019. For this reason, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.23 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. 19 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 21 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 22 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). 23 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 20 17 PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– BX–2019–038 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BX–2019–038. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–BX–2019–038 and should be submitted on or before November 15, 2019. E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2019 / Notices For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.24 Eduardo A. Aleman, Deputy Secretary. places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. [FR Doc. 2019–23254 Filed 10–24–19; 8:45 am] A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–87370; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2019–086] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Make Permanent Certain Options Market Rules That Are Linked to the Equity Market Plan To Address Extraordinary Market Volatility October 21, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 18, 2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to make permanent certain options market rules that are linked to the equity market Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the 24 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Oct 24, 2019 Jkt 250001 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to make permanent certain options market rules in connection with the equity market Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Plan’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’). This change is being proposed in connection with the recently approved amendment to the Limit UpLimit Down Plan that allows the Plan to continue to operate on a permanent basis (‘‘Amendment 18’’).3 This proposed rule change is substantially similar to a recently-approved rule change by Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’).4 In an attempt to address extraordinary market volatility in NMS Stocks, and, in particular, events like the severe volatility on May 6, 2010, U.S. national securities exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Participants’’) drafted the Plan pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS and under the Act.5 On May 31, 2012, the Commission approved the Plan, as amended, on a one-year pilot basis.6 Though the Plan was primarily designed for equity markets, the Exchange believed it would, indirectly, potentially impact the options markets as well. Thus, the Exchange has previously adopted and amended Chapter V, Section 3(d) to ensure the option markets were not harmed as a result of the Plan’s implementation and has implemented such rules on a pilot basis that has coincided with the pilot period for the Plan (the ‘‘Options Pilots’’).7 Chapter V, Section 3(d) 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11, 2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (Order Approving Amendment No. 18). 4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 86744 (August 23, 2019), 84 FR 45565 (August 29, 2019) (SR–CBOE–2019–049) (Notice of Filing); and 87311 (October 15, 2019) (SR–CBOE–2019–049) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2). The Exchange understands that the other national securities exchanges will also file similar proposals to make permanent their respective pilot programs. 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25, 2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1, 2011) (File No. 4–631). 6 See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012) 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69120 (March 12, 2013), 78 FR 16740 (March 18, 2013) PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 57513 addresses the interplay of the Exchange’s rules in response to the Plan, and includes provisions on how the Exchange will treat certain options orders during a limit or straddle state as well as options market maker quoting obligations during a limit or straddle state. In addition, Section 3(d)(iv) provides that during a limit or straddle state, trades are not subject to obvious or catastrophic error review. A limit or straddle state occurs when at least one side of the National Best Bid (‘‘NBB’’) or Offer (‘‘NBO’’) bid/ask is priced at a non-tradable level. Specifically, a straddle state exists when the NBB is below the lower price band while the NBO is inside the prices band or when the NBO is above the upper price band and the NBB is within the band, while a limit state occurs when the NBO equals the lower price band (without crossing the NBB), or the NBB equals the upper price band (without crossing the NBO). The Exchange adopted the Options Pilots to protect investors because when an underlying security is in a limit up-limit down state, there will not be a reliable price for the security to serve as a benchmark for the price of the option. Specifically, the Exchange adopted Chapter V, Section 3(d)(iv) because the application of the obvious and catastrophic error rules would be impracticable given the potential for lack of a reliable NBBO in the options market during limit and straddle states. When adjusting or busting a trade pursuant to the obvious error rule, the determination of theoretical value of a trade generally references the NBB (for erroneous sell transactions) or NBO (for erroneous buy transactions) just prior to the trade in question, and is therefore not reliable when at least one side of the NBBO is priced at a non-tradeable level, as is the case in limit and straddle states. In such a situation, determining theoretical value may often times be a very subjective rather than an objective determination and could give rise to additional uncertainty and confusion for investors. As a result, application of the obvious and catastrophic error rules would be impracticable given the lack of a reliable NBBO in the options market during limit and straddle states, and may produce undesirable effects or unanticipated consequences. As noted above, the Exchange adopted additional measures via other Options Pilot rules that are designed to protect investors (SR–NASDAQ–2013–040); 69333 (April 5, 2013), 78 FR 21675 (April 11, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013– 043); and 69341 (April 8, 2013), 78 FR 21996 (April 12, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–048). E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM 25OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57509-57513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87368; File No. SR-BX-2019-038]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Make Permanent 
Certain Options Market Rules That Are Linked to the Equity Market Plan 
To Address Extraordinary Market Volatility

October 21, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on October 18, 2019, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this 
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to make permanent certain options market 
rules that are linked to the equity market Plan to Address 
Extraordinary Market Volatility.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at

[[Page 57510]]

the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to make permanent 
certain options market rules in connection with the equity market Plan 
to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down 
Plan'' or the ``Plan''). This change is being proposed in connection 
with the recently approved amendment to the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan 
that allows the Plan to continue to operate on a permanent basis 
(``Amendment 18'').\3\ This proposed rule change is substantially 
similar to a recently-approved rule change by Cboe Exchange, Inc. 
(``Cboe'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (April 11, 
2019), 84 FR 16086 (April 17, 2019) (Order Approving Amendment No. 
18).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 86744 (August 23, 
2019), 84 FR 45565 (August 29, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-049) (Notice of 
Filing); and 87311 (October 15, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-049) (Notice of 
Filing of Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2). The 
Exchange understands that the other national securities exchanges 
will also file similar proposals to make permanent their respective 
pilot programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In an attempt to address extraordinary market volatility in NMS 
Stocks, and, in particular, events like the severe volatility on May 6, 
2010, U.S. national securities exchanges and the Financial Industry 
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (collectively, ``Participants'') drafted the 
Plan pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS and under the Act.\5\ On 
May 31, 2012, the Commission approved the Plan, as amended, on a one-
year pilot basis.\6\ Though the Plan was primarily designed for equity 
markets, the Exchange believed it would, indirectly, potentially impact 
the options markets as well. Thus, the Exchange has previously adopted 
and amended Chapter V, Section 3(d) to ensure the option markets were 
not harmed as a result of the Plan's implementation and has implemented 
such rules on a pilot basis that has coincided with the pilot period 
for the Plan (the ``Options Pilots'').\7\ Chapter V, Section 3(d) 
addresses the interplay of the Exchange's rules in response to the 
Plan, and includes provisions on how the Exchange will treat certain 
options orders during a limit or straddle state as well as options 
market maker quoting obligations during a limit or straddle state. In 
addition, Section 3(d)(iv) provides that during a limit or straddle 
state, trades are not subject to obvious or catastrophic error review. 
A limit or straddle state occurs when at least one side of the National 
Best Bid (``NBB'') or Offer (``NBO'') bid/ask is priced at a non-
tradable level. Specifically, a straddle state exists when the NBB is 
below the lower price band while the NBO is inside the prices band or 
when the NBO is above the upper price band and the NBB is within the 
band, while a limit state occurs when the NBO equals the lower price 
band (without crossing the NBB), or the NBB equals the upper price band 
(without crossing the NBO). The Exchange adopted the Options Pilots to 
protect investors because when an underlying security is in a limit up-
limit down state, there will not be a reliable price for the security 
to serve as a benchmark for the price of the option. Specifically, the 
Exchange adopted Chapter V, Section 3(d)(iv) because the application of 
the obvious and catastrophic error rules would be impracticable given 
the potential for lack of a reliable NBBO in the options market during 
limit and straddle states. When adjusting or busting a trade pursuant 
to the obvious error rule, the determination of theoretical value of a 
trade generally references the NBB (for erroneous sell transactions) or 
NBO (for erroneous buy transactions) just prior to the trade in 
question, and is therefore not reliable when at least one side of the 
NBBO is priced at a non-tradeable level, as is the case in limit and 
straddle states. In such a situation, determining theoretical value may 
often times be a very subjective rather than an objective determination 
and could give rise to additional uncertainty and confusion for 
investors. As a result, application of the obvious and catastrophic 
error rules would be impracticable given the lack of a reliable NBBO in 
the options market during limit and straddle states, and may produce 
undesirable effects or unanticipated consequences. As noted above, the 
Exchange adopted additional measures via other Options Pilot rules that 
are designed to protect investors during limit and straddle states.\8\ 
For example, the Exchange will reject Market Orders (as defined in 
Chapter VI, Section 1) during a Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure 
that only those orders with a limit price will be executed during a 
limit or straddle state given the uncertainty of market prices during 
such a state. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that eliminating the 
application of obvious error rules during a limit or straddle state 
eliminates the re-evaluation of a transaction executed during such a 
state that could potentially create an unreasonable adverse selection 
opportunity due to the lack of a reliable reference price on one side 
of the market or another and discourage participants from providing 
liquidity during limit and straddle states, which is contrary to the 
goal in limiting participants' adverse selection with the application 
of the obvious error rule during normal trading states. For these 
reasons, the Exchange believes the Options Pilots and related rules are 
designed to add certainty on the options markets, which encourages more 
investors to participate in light of the changes associated with the 
Plan. The Plan was originally implemented on a pilot-basis in order to 
allow the public, the participating exchanges, and the Commission to 
assess the operation of the Plan and whether the Plan should be 
modified prior to approval on a permanent basis. As stated, the 
Exchange adopted the Option Pilots to coincide with this pilot; to 
continue the protections therein while the industry gains further 
experience operating the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64547 (May 25, 
2011), 76 FR 31647 (June 1, 2011) (File No. 4-631).
    \6\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69119 (March 12, 
2013), 78 FR 16746 (March 18, 2013) (SR-BX-2013-021); 69334 (April 
5, 2013), 78 FR 21653 (April 11, 2013) (SR-BX-2013-022); and 69343 
(April 8, 2013), 78 FR 21982 (April 12, 2013) (SR-BX-2013-026).
    \8\ As set forth in Chapter V, Section 3(d), this includes rules 
in connection with special handling for Market Orders, and options 
market maker quoting obligations during a limit or straddle state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with the order approving the establishment of the 
obvious error pilot, as well as the extensions of the obvious error 
pilot, the Exchange committed to submit monthly data regarding the 
program and to submit an overall analysis of the obvious error pilot in 
conjunction with

[[Page 57511]]

the data submitted under the Plan and any other data as requested by 
the Commission. Pursuant to a rule filing, approved on April 8, 2014, 
each month, the Exchange committed to provide the Commission, and the 
public, a dataset containing the data for each straddle and limit state 
in optionable stocks that had at least one trade on the Exchange.\9\ 
The Exchange has continued to provide the Commission with this data on 
a monthly basis. For each trade on the Exchange, the Exchange provides 
(a) the stock symbol, option symbol, time at the start of the straddle 
or limit state, an indicator for whether it is a straddle or limit 
state, and (b) for the trades on the Exchange, the executed volume, 
time-weighted quoted bid-ask spread, time-weighted average quoted depth 
at the bid, time-weighted average quoted depth at the offer, high 
execution price, low execution price, number of trades for which a 
request for review for error was received during straddle and limit 
states, an indicator variable for whether those options outlined above 
have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying stock's limit 
or straddle state compared to the last available option price as 
reported by OPRA before the start of the limit or straddle state. In 
addition, to help evaluate the impact of the pilot program, the 
Exchange has provided to the Commission, and the public, assessments 
relating to the impact of the operation of the obvious error rules 
during limit and straddle states including: (1) An evaluation of the 
statistical and economic impact of limit and straddle states on 
liquidity and market quality in the options markets, and (2) an 
assessment of whether the lack of obvious error rules in effect during 
the straddle and limit states are problematic. The Exchange has 
concluded that the Options Pilots do not negatively impact market 
quality during normal market conditions,\10\ and that there has been 
insufficient data to assess whether a lack of obvious error rules is 
problematic, however, the Exchange believes the continuation of the 
Options Pilots function to protect against any unanticipated 
consequences in the options markets during a limit or straddle state 
and add certainty on the options markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71900 (April 8, 
2014), 79 FR 20951 (April 14, 2014) (SR-BX-2014-017); see also BX 
LULD Reports, available at: https://www.nasdaq.com/solutions/options/LULD.
    \10\ See also BX LULD Reports, available at: https://www.nasdaq.com/solutions/options/LULD. During the most recent Review 
Period the Exchange did not receive any obvious error review 
requests for Limit-Up-Limit Down trades, and Limit Up-Limit Down 
trade volume accounted for nominal overall trade volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission recently approved the Plan on a permanent basis 
(Amendment 18).\11\ In connection with this approval, the Exchange now 
proposes to amend Chapter V, Section 3(d) that currently implement 
provisions of the Plan on a pilot basis to eliminate the pilot basis, 
which effectiveness expires on October 18, 2019, and to make such rules 
permanent. In its approval order to make the Plan permanent, the 
Commission recognized that, as a result of the Participants' and 
industry analysis of the Plan's operation, the Limit Up-Limit Down 
mechanism effectively addresses extraordinary market volatility. 
Indeed, the Plan benefits markets and market participants by helping to 
ensure orderly markets, but also, the Exchange believes, based on the 
data made available to the public and the Commission during the pilot 
period, that the obvious error pilot does not negatively impact market 
quality during normal market conditions.\12\ Rather, the Exchange 
believes the obvious error pilot functions to protect against any 
unanticipated consequences in the options markets during a limit or 
straddle state and add certainty on the options markets. The Exchange 
also believes the other Options Pilots rules provide additional 
measures designed to protect investors during limit and straddle 
states. For example, the Exchange will reject Market Orders during a 
Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure that only those orders with a limit 
price will be executed during a limit or straddle state given the 
uncertainty of market prices during such a state.\13\ This removes 
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and 
national market system by encouraging more investors to participate in 
light of the changes associated with the Plan. The Exchange believes 
that if approved on a permanent basis, the Options Pilots would 
permanently provide investors with the above-described additional 
certainty of market prices and mitigation of unanticipated consequences 
and unreasonable adverse selection risk during limit and straddle 
states.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 3.
    \12\ See supra note 10.
    \13\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the Commission's approval of Amendment 18 allowing the Plan 
to operate on a permanent basis, the Exchange and other national 
securities exchanges have determined that no further amendments should 
be made to the Options Pilots; \14\ the current Options Pilots 
effectively address extraordinary market volatility, are reasonably 
designed to comply with the requirements of the Plan, facilitate 
compliance with the Plan and should now operate on a permanent basis, 
consistent with the Plan. The Exchange does not propose any substantive 
or additional changes to Chapter V, Section 3(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85622 (April 11, 
2019), 84 FR 16116 (April 17, 2019) (SR-BX-2019-007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\15\ in general, and 
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ in particular, in that it is designed 
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest and not to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
supports the objectives of perfecting the mechanism of a free and open 
market and the national market system because it promotes transparency 
and uniformity across markets concerning rules for options markets 
adopted to coincide with the Plan. The Exchange believes that 
eliminating the pilot basis for the Options Pilots and making such 
rules permanent facilitates compliance with the Plan by adding 
certainty to the markets during periods of market volatility, which has 
been approved and found by the Commission to be reasonably designed to 
prevent potentially harmful price volatility in NMS Stocks. It has been 
determined by the Commission that the Plan benefits markets and market 
participants by helping to ensure orderly markets, and, based on the 
data made available to the public and the Commission during the pilot 
period for Chapter V, Section 3(d)(iv), the Plan does not negatively 
impact options market quality during normal market conditions. Rather, 
the Plan, as it is implemented under the obvious error pilot, functions 
to protect against any unanticipated consequences in the options 
markets during a limit or straddle state and add certainty on the 
options markets. During a limit or

[[Page 57512]]

straddle state, determining theoretical value of an option may be a 
subjective rather than an objective determination given the lack of a 
reliable NBBO, which may create an unreasonable adverse selection 
opportunity and discourage participants from providing liquidity during 
limit and straddle states. Therefore, the Exchange believes eliminating 
obvious error review in such states would, in turn, eliminate 
uncertainty and confusion for investors and benefit investors by 
encouraging more participation in light of the changes associated with 
the Plan. As stated, the Exchange believes the other Options Pilots 
rules provide additional measures designed to protect investors during 
limit and straddle states. For example, the Exchange will reject Market 
Orders during a Limit Up-Limit Down state to ensure that only those 
orders with a limit price will be executed during a limit or straddle 
state given the uncertainty of market prices during such a state.\17\ 
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that making the Options Pilots 
permanent will further the goals of investor protection and fair and 
orderly markets as the rules effectively address extraordinary market 
volatility pursuant to the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is 
necessary to reflect that the Plan no longer operates as a pilot and 
has been approved to operate on a permanent basis by the Commission. As 
such, Chapter V, Section 3(d), which implement protections in 
connection with the Plan, should be amended to operate on a permanent 
basis. The Exchange understands that the other national securities 
exchanges will also file similar proposals to make permanent their 
respective pilot programs.\18\ Thus, the proposed rule change will help 
to ensure consistency across market centers without implicating any 
competitive issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ In addition, the Exchange's proposal is substantially 
similar to Cboe's recently approved rule change. See supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or 
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along 
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \21\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \22\ permits the Commission to 
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked 
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed 
rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing. 
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is 
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as 
it will allow the current Options Pilots to continue on a permanent 
basis without any changes, prior to the pilot expiration on October 18, 
2019. For this reason, the Commission hereby waives the 30-day 
operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as operative 
upon filing.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \23\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or 
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2019-038 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2019-038. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-BX-2019-038 and should be submitted on 
or before November 15, 2019.


[[Page 57513]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23254 Filed 10-24-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.