Assistance to States for the Education of Children With Disabilities, 56154-56156 [2019-22888]
Download as PDF
56154
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 203 / Monday, October 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
5409, 5442, 5486, 5599, 5630, 94075/01, or
94048/01 installed.
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as
failure of a screw attaching the hydraulic
pump cover. This condition could result in
failure of a cover bolt and loss of fluid from
the hydraulic pump, resulting in loss of the
hydraulic system and subsequent loss of
helicopter control.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2017–14–05,
Amendment 39–18949 (82 FR 31899, July 11,
2017) (AD 2017–14–05).
(d) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
December 20, 2019.
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 2913, Hydraulic Pump (Electric/
Engine) Main.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September
10, 2019.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
(f) Required Actions
(1) Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS)
from July 26, 2017 (the effective date of AD
2017–14–05), replace the RH hydraulic pump
with an airworthy hydraulic pump that is not
listed in paragraph (a) of this AD.
(2) Within 110 hours TIS from the effective
date of this AD, replace the LH hydraulic
pump with an airworthy hydraulic pump
that is not listed in paragraph (a) of this AD.
(3) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install on any helicopter a hydraulic
pump that is listed in paragraph (a) of this
AD.
[FR Doc. 2019–22815 Filed 10–18–19; 8:45 am]
(g) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Safety Management
Section, Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA,
may approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your
proposal to: Matt Fuller, Senior Aviation
Safety Engineer, Safety Management Section,
Rotorcraft Standards Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email 9-ASWFTW-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972)
641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–
3775; or at https://
www.helicopters.airbus.com/website/en/ref/
Technical-Support_73.html. You may review
a copy of the service information at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
No. 2016–0264–E, dated December 22, 2016.
You may view the EASA AD on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov in the AD
Docket.
(i) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. SA330–29.12, Revision
0, dated December 22, 2016, and Nexter
Mechanics Alert Service Bulletin No. NM/
INGE/16–140, Revision 0, dated December
22, 2016, which are not incorporated by
reference, contain additional information
about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 18, 2019
Jkt 250001
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 300
[Docket ID ED–2019–OSERS–0111]
Assistance to States for the Education
of Children With Disabilities
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed
interpretation.
AGENCY:
The Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
established the National Instructional
Materials Access Center (NIMAC) in
2004 to assist State educational agencies
(SEAs) and local educational agencies
(LEAs) to produce accessible
instructional materials for students with
print disabilities. The U.S. Department
of Education (Department) issues this
notice of proposed interpretation to
clarify the definition of ‘‘print
instructional materials’’ in section
674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA to include digital
instructional materials. This means that
the NIMAC would accept digital
instructional materials.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before November 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments submitted by fax or by email
or those submitted after the comment
period. To ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comments only once. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘How to use
Regulations.gov.’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver
your comments about this proposed
interpretation, address them to Tara
Courchaine, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 5054E, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–5076.
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy is to make all comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara
Courchaine, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 5054E, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–5076.
Telephone: (202) 245–6462. Email:
Tara.Courchaine@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments on
this notice of proposed interpretation.
See ADDRESSES for instructions on how
to submit comments.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed interpretation by
accessing Regulations.gov. You may also
inspect the comments in person in
Room 3W104, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW, Washington, DC, between the hours
of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays. If you want to
schedule time to inspect comments,
please contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the Record: On
request, we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or
other documents in the public record for
this document. If you want to schedule
an appointment for this type of aid,
please contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 203 / Monday, October 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
The NIMAC was established under
IDEA in 2004 to assist SEAs and LEAs
in the production of accessible
instructional materials for students with
print disabilities. While discussing
proposed changes to IDEA in the Senate,
Senator Dodd, a co-sponsor of the bill,
commented on the reason for
establishing NIMAC stating ‘‘. . . these
important provisions will greatly aid
blind and print disabled students by
ensuring they receive their textbooks
and other instructional materials in the
formats they require, such as Braille, at
the same time as their sighted peers.’’
108 Cong. Rec. S11, 656 (April 29,
2003). Similarly, the House report notes
that, ‘‘. . . the provision is intended to
provide students who are blind or have
other print disabilities with more timely
access to instructional materials used in
elementary and secondary schools.’’
H.R. Rep. No. 108–77, at 98 (April 29,
2003). Within the legislation, the scope
and duties of the NIMAC as the
searchable online national file
repository of K–12 print textbooks in the
XML-based National Instructional
Materials Accessibility Standard
(NIMAS) format are clearly defined, as
are the key definitions framing its
operations.
These duties are:
1. To receive and maintain a catalog
of print instructional materials prepared
in the NIMAS, as established by the
Secretary, made available to such center
by the textbook publishing industry,
SEAs, and LEAs.
2. To provide access to print
instructional materials, including
textbooks, in accessible media, free of
charge, to blind or other persons with
print disabilities in elementary schools
and secondary schools, in accordance
with such terms and procedures as the
NIMAC may prescribe.
3. To develop, adopt, and publish
procedures to protect against copyright
infringement, with respect to the print
instructional materials provided in
sections 612(a)(23) and 613(a)(6) of
IDEA. (34 CFR 300.172(e)(1)(ii); 20
U.S.C. 1474(e)(2)(A), (B), (C))
Under section 674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA,
the term ‘‘print instructional materials’’
means ‘‘printed textbooks and related
printed core materials that are written
and published primarily for use in
elementary school and secondary school
instruction and are required by a State
educational agency or local educational
agency for use by students in the
classroom.’’ During the 15 years since
the NIMAS was created by Federal
statute, the use of digital educational
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 18, 2019
Jkt 250001
materials 1 as a core component of
elementary and secondary curriculum
has grown significantly. Currently, the
majority of States have digital learning
plans and digital learning standards. In
addition, State leaders have
demonstrated a commitment to digital
learning and the use of digital materials
and to support personalized learning
that meets the needs of all students.2 In
fact, in 2014 Florida developed a fiveyear plan that requires all schools to
move to digital classrooms.3 In a recent
United States survey, 75 percent of
classroom teachers expected digital
content to replace traditional print
textbooks by 2026.4
Currently, IDEA does not specifically
address the inclusion or use of digital
instructional materials, which were not
as common when the law was originally
enacted. At this time NIMAC does not
accept digital instructional materials.
This exclusion of digital materials
unnecessarily and inappropriately
limits access to such materials for
students who are blind or visually
impaired. The exclusion of digital
instructional materials from the NIMAC
also forces teachers to retrofit materials
or provide alternate materials that are
not equivalent to those available to
peers without disabilities. Additionally,
these retrofitted materials may not be
provided to students in a timely manner
or are of inconsistent quality.
Consequently, students who are blind or
visually impaired are potentially denied
equal educational opportunity,
comparable access to materials, and
access to information in a timely
manner by excluding digital
instructional materials from the
definition of print instructional
materials. This is especially true for
students in Pre-K–3, who require
embossed braille to ensure a solid
foundation in early literacy, as well as
for older students who use braille
(embossed or digital) to access academic
content.
Digitally formatted materials
accompanied by technology have the
potential to facilitate learning for all
1 For the purpose of this notice of interpretation,
the Department views ‘‘digital educational
materials’’ as ‘‘digital instructional materials.’’
2 State Educational Technology Directors
Association (SETDA). (2019). State K12
Instructional Materials Leadership Trends
Snapshot. See https://www.setda.org/master/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/DMAPS_snapshot_
3.26.19.pdf.
3 Florida’s Digital Classrooms Program. See https://
www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/5658/urlt/
0097843-fdoedigitalclassroomsplan.pdf.
4 Harpur, Paul. (2017). Discrimination, copyright
and equality: Opening the e-book for the print
disabled. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/
abstract=2977629.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
56155
students. However, such materials will
benefit students who are blind, visually
impaired, or have other print disabilities
only if they are available in accessible
formats.5
Proposed Interpretation
Given the purpose of NIMAC, the
trend toward digital instructional
materials and resources, and the silence
of the statute on the acceptance of
digital files, the Department proposes to
interpret the phrase ‘‘printed textbooks
and related printed core materials’’
referred to in the definition of ‘‘print
instructional materials’’ in section
674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA to include digital
instructional materials that comply with
NIMAS, because that is the primary
medium through which many textbooks
and core materials are now printed. The
Department considers digital materials
submitted to NIMAC to be in digital
print format, which falls under the
larger category of ‘‘print’’ and is
consistent with the statutory language of
section 674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA. The
Department believes this interpretation
to be aligned with the purpose of the
statute, which is to provide timely
instructional materials to students who
are blind or have other print disabilities.
Therefore, under this interpretation,
NIMAC would be able to accept digital
instructional materials submitted in a
valid XML-based NIMAS format.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or portable document format (PDF).
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article
search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
5 Harpur, Paul. (2017). Discrimination, copyright
and equality: Opening the e-book for the print
disabled. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/
abstract=2977629.
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
56156
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 203 / Monday, October 21, 2019 / Proposed Rules
documents published by the
Department.
Johnny W. Collett,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–22888 Filed 10–18–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0556; FRL–10001–
23–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; San
Diego Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the San Diego Air Pollution
Control District (SDAPCD) portion of
the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). This revision concerns
emissions of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) from Adhesive
Material Application Operations. We are
proposing to approve a local rule to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We
SUMMARY:
are taking comments on this proposal
and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
November 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2019–0556 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 947–4125 or by
email at vineyard.christine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA’s Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rule
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the dates that it was
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted to the EPA by the California
Air Resource Board.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule #
SDAPCD .................................
67.21
monitoring requirements. The EPA’s
technical support document (TSD) has
more information about this rule.
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
Rules in the SIP must be enforceable
(see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
Generally, SIP rules must require
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of
sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
as well as each major source of VOCs in
ozone nonattainment areas classified as
Moderate or above (see CAA section
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
Emissions of VOCs help produce
ground-level ozone, or smog, and
particulate matter, which harm human
health and the environment. Sections
110(a) and 182(b)(2) of the CAA require
states to submit regulations that control
VOC emissions. Rule 67.21 establishes
VOC content limits and workplace
standards from the application of
adhesives, sealants, and adhesive and
sealant primers. It also contains related
recordkeeping, reporting, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 18, 2019
Jkt 250001
Amended
Adhesive Material Application Operations .............................
On February 9, 2018, the submittal for
SDAPCD Rule 67.21 was deemed by
operation of law to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
There are no previous versions of
Rule 67.21 in the SIP.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Rule title
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
05/14/08
Submitted
08/09/17
182(b)(2)). The SDAPCD regulates an
ozone nonattainment area classified as
Moderate for the 2008 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
40 CFR 81.305. Therefore, this rule must
implement RACT.
Guidance and policy documents that
we used to evaluate enforceability,
revision/relaxation and rule stringency
requirements for the applicable criteria
pollutant includes the following:
1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General
Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070
(April 28, 1992).
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,’’
EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised
January 11, 1990).
3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,’’
EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little
Bluebook).
4. ‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives,’’ EPA–
453/R–08–005, September 2008. (https://
E:\FR\FM\21OCP1.SGM
21OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 203 (Monday, October 21, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 56154-56156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22888]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 300
[Docket ID ED-2019-OSERS-0111]
Assistance to States for the Education of Children With
Disabilities
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed interpretation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
established the National Instructional Materials Access Center (NIMAC)
in 2004 to assist State educational agencies (SEAs) and local
educational agencies (LEAs) to produce accessible instructional
materials for students with print disabilities. The U.S. Department of
Education (Department) issues this notice of proposed interpretation to
clarify the definition of ``print instructional materials'' in section
674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA to include digital instructional materials. This
means that the NIMAC would accept digital instructional materials.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before November 20, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments submitted by fax or by email or those submitted after
the comment period. To ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies,
please submit your comments only once. In addition, please include the
Docket ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to
submit your comments electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site
under ``How to use Regulations.gov.''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: If you
mail or deliver your comments about this proposed interpretation,
address them to Tara Courchaine, U.S. Department of Education, 400
Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5054E, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC
20202-5076.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments
received from members of the public available for public viewing in
their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara Courchaine, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5054E, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202-5076. Telephone: (202) 245-6462. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation to Comment:
We invite you to submit comments on this notice of proposed
interpretation. See ADDRESSES for instructions on how to submit
comments.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed interpretation by accessing
Regulations.gov. You may also inspect the comments in person in Room
3W104, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays. If you want to schedule time to inspect
comments, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Record: On request, we will provide an appropriate accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who needs assistance
to review the comments or other documents in the public record for this
document. If you want to schedule an appointment for this type of aid,
please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
[[Page 56155]]
Background
The NIMAC was established under IDEA in 2004 to assist SEAs and
LEAs in the production of accessible instructional materials for
students with print disabilities. While discussing proposed changes to
IDEA in the Senate, Senator Dodd, a co-sponsor of the bill, commented
on the reason for establishing NIMAC stating ``. . . these important
provisions will greatly aid blind and print disabled students by
ensuring they receive their textbooks and other instructional materials
in the formats they require, such as Braille, at the same time as their
sighted peers.'' 108 Cong. Rec. S11, 656 (April 29, 2003). Similarly,
the House report notes that, ``. . . the provision is intended to
provide students who are blind or have other print disabilities with
more timely access to instructional materials used in elementary and
secondary schools.'' H.R. Rep. No. 108-77, at 98 (April 29, 2003).
Within the legislation, the scope and duties of the NIMAC as the
searchable online national file repository of K-12 print textbooks in
the XML-based National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard
(NIMAS) format are clearly defined, as are the key definitions framing
its operations.
These duties are:
1. To receive and maintain a catalog of print instructional
materials prepared in the NIMAS, as established by the Secretary, made
available to such center by the textbook publishing industry, SEAs, and
LEAs.
2. To provide access to print instructional materials, including
textbooks, in accessible media, free of charge, to blind or other
persons with print disabilities in elementary schools and secondary
schools, in accordance with such terms and procedures as the NIMAC may
prescribe.
3. To develop, adopt, and publish procedures to protect against
copyright infringement, with respect to the print instructional
materials provided in sections 612(a)(23) and 613(a)(6) of IDEA. (34
CFR 300.172(e)(1)(ii); 20 U.S.C. 1474(e)(2)(A), (B), (C))
Under section 674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA, the term ``print instructional
materials'' means ``printed textbooks and related printed core
materials that are written and published primarily for use in
elementary school and secondary school instruction and are required by
a State educational agency or local educational agency for use by
students in the classroom.'' During the 15 years since the NIMAS was
created by Federal statute, the use of digital educational materials
\1\ as a core component of elementary and secondary curriculum has
grown significantly. Currently, the majority of States have digital
learning plans and digital learning standards. In addition, State
leaders have demonstrated a commitment to digital learning and the use
of digital materials and to support personalized learning that meets
the needs of all students.\2\ In fact, in 2014 Florida developed a
five-year plan that requires all schools to move to digital
classrooms.\3\ In a recent United States survey, 75 percent of
classroom teachers expected digital content to replace traditional
print textbooks by 2026.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For the purpose of this notice of interpretation, the
Department views ``digital educational materials'' as ``digital
instructional materials.''
\2\ State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA).
(2019). State K12 Instructional Materials Leadership Trends
Snapshot. See https://www.setda.org/master/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DMAPS_snapshot_3.26.19.pdf.
\3\ Florida's Digital Classrooms Program. See https://www.fldoe.org/core/fileparse.php/5658/urlt/0097843-fdoedigitalclassroomsplan.pdf.
\4\ Harpur, Paul. (2017). Discrimination, copyright and
equality: Opening the e-book for the print disabled. Retrieved from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977629.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, IDEA does not specifically address the inclusion or use
of digital instructional materials, which were not as common when the
law was originally enacted. At this time NIMAC does not accept digital
instructional materials. This exclusion of digital materials
unnecessarily and inappropriately limits access to such materials for
students who are blind or visually impaired. The exclusion of digital
instructional materials from the NIMAC also forces teachers to retrofit
materials or provide alternate materials that are not equivalent to
those available to peers without disabilities. Additionally, these
retrofitted materials may not be provided to students in a timely
manner or are of inconsistent quality. Consequently, students who are
blind or visually impaired are potentially denied equal educational
opportunity, comparable access to materials, and access to information
in a timely manner by excluding digital instructional materials from
the definition of print instructional materials. This is especially
true for students in Pre-K-3, who require embossed braille to ensure a
solid foundation in early literacy, as well as for older students who
use braille (embossed or digital) to access academic content.
Digitally formatted materials accompanied by technology have the
potential to facilitate learning for all students. However, such
materials will benefit students who are blind, visually impaired, or
have other print disabilities only if they are available in accessible
formats.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Harpur, Paul. (2017). Discrimination, copyright and
equality: Opening the e-book for the print disabled. Retrieved from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2977629.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Interpretation
Given the purpose of NIMAC, the trend toward digital instructional
materials and resources, and the silence of the statute on the
acceptance of digital files, the Department proposes to interpret the
phrase ``printed textbooks and related printed core materials''
referred to in the definition of ``print instructional materials'' in
section 674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA to include digital instructional materials
that comply with NIMAS, because that is the primary medium through
which many textbooks and core materials are now printed. The Department
considers digital materials submitted to NIMAC to be in digital print
format, which falls under the larger category of ``print'' and is
consistent with the statutory language of section 674(e)(3)(C) of IDEA.
The Department believes this interpretation to be aligned with the
purpose of the statute, which is to provide timely instructional
materials to students who are blind or have other print disabilities.
Therefore, under this interpretation, NIMAC would be able to accept
digital instructional materials submitted in a valid XML-based NIMAS
format.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or portable document format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article
search feature at www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through
the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to
[[Page 56156]]
documents published by the Department.
Johnny W. Collett,
Assistant Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-22888 Filed 10-18-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P