Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 52459-52460 [2019-21441]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices
access.trade.gov and to all parties in the
Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the
main Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the electronic version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Sunset Reviews
Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce
determines that revocation of the Orders
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping, and that the
magnitude of the dumping margins
likely to prevail would be weightedaverage margins up to 167.11 percent for
Malaysia, 24.01 percent for Thailand,
and 16.25 percent for Vietnam.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or
conversion to judicial protective, orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752(c), and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218
and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii).
Dated: September 25, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Orders
IV. History of the Orders
V. Legal Framework
VI. Discussion of the Issues
A. Likelihood of Continuation or
Recurrence of Dumping
B. Magnitude of the Dumping Margins
Likely to Prevail
VII. Final Results of Sunset Reviews
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2019–21445 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Oct 01, 2019
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018–2019
52459
the POR.5 We asked interested parties to
file comments on this data and submit
comments by July 25, 2019. No party
filed comments.
Scope of the Order
On February 8, 2019, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on uncovered
innerspring units (innersprings) from
the People’s Republic of China (China).1
In response, on February 28, 2019,
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (the
petitioner) requested a review of two
companies, Jietai Machinery Ltd. (HK)
(Jietai) and Green Asia Parts, LTD.
(Green Asia).2 Commerce initiated a
review for both companies on May 2,
2019.3 The deadline for interested
parties to submit an SRA or separate
rate certification (SRC) was June 3,
2019.4 No party submitted an SRA or an
SRC. On July 18, 2019, Commerce
placed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) data on the record of
this review demonstrating that neither
Jietai nor Green Asia had entries during
The merchandise subject to the order
is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal
springs joined together in sizes
corresponding to the sizes of adult
mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
full long, queen, California king and
king) and units used in smaller
constructions, such as crib and youth
mattresses. All uncovered innerspring
units are included in the scope
regardless of width and length. Included
within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76
inches in width and 68 inches to 84
inches in length. Innersprings for crib
mattresses typically range from 25
inches to 27 inches in width and 50
inches to 52 inches in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are
suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of
innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam
encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed
innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings
are typically joined together with helical
wire and border rods. Non-pocketed
innersprings are included in this
definition regardless of whether they
have border rods attached to the
perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed
innersprings are individual coils
covered by a ‘‘pocket’’ or ‘‘sock’’ of a
nonwoven synthetic material or woven
material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified
under subheading 9404.29.9010 and
have also been classified under
subheadings 9404.10.0000,
9404.29.9005, 9404.29.9011,
7326.20.0070, 7326.20.0090,
7320.20.5010, 7320.90.5010, or
7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS).6 The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 84 FR 2816
(February 8, 2019).
2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Uncovered Innerspring
Units from the People’s Republic of China: Request
for Tenth Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated February 28, 2019.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
18777 (May 2, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
4 See Initiation Notice.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘10th Administrative
Review of Uncovered Innerspring Units from the
People’s Republic of China: Customs Data of U.S.
Imports,’’ dated July 18, 2019.
6 Based on a recommendation by CBP, on
September 6, 2017, the Department added HTS
7326.20.0090 to the scope. See Memorandum,
‘‘Request from Customs and Border Protection to
Update the ACE AD/CVD Case Reference File,
Uncovered Innersprings from the People’s Republic
of China (A–570–928) and South Africa (A–791–
821),’’ dated September 6, 2017.
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that the two companies subject to this
administrative review are part of the
China-wide entity because neither filed
a separate rate application (SRA). The
period of review (POR) is February 1,
2018 through January 31, 2019. We
invite interested parties to comment on
these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable October 2, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone at (202) 482–2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
52460
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 2, 2019 / Notices
purposes only; the written description
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213.
Preliminary Results of Review
Neither of the companies subject to
this review filed an SRA. Thus,
Commerce preliminarily determines
that these companies have not
demonstrated their eligibility for
separate rate status. As such, Commerce
preliminarily determines that the
companies subject to review are part of
the China-wide entity. In addition,
Commerce no longer considers the nonmarket economy (NME) entity as an
exporter conditionally subject to an
antidumping duty administrative
review.7 Accordingly, the NME entity
will not be under review unless
Commerce specifically receives a
request for, or self-initiates, a review of
the NME entity.8 In this administrative
review, no party requested a review of
the China-wide entity. Moreover, we
have not self-initiated a review of the
China-wide entity. Because no review of
the China-wide entity is being
conducted, the China-wide entity’s
entries are not subject to the review and
the rate applicable to the NME entity is
not subject to change as a result of this
review. The China-wide entity rate is
234.51 percent.
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results and
may submit case briefs and/or written
comments, filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS), within 30 days after the date
of publication of these preliminary
results of review.9 ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://
access.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit in
room B8024 of the main Commerce
building. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, must be
filed within five days after the time
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7 See
Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963, 65970 (November 4, 2013).
8 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Oct 01, 2019
Jkt 250001
limit for filing case briefs.10 Parties who
submit case or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are requested to submit with
each argument a statement of the issue,
a brief summary of the argument, and a
table of authorities.11
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to Commerce within 30 days of
the date of publication of this notice.12
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case and
rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing
is made, parties will be notified of the
time and date for the hearing to be held
at the U.S. Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington DC 20230.13 Commerce
intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, which will
include the results of our analysis of all
issues raised in the case briefs, within
120 days of publication of these
preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless extended, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of
this review, Commerce will determine,
and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of
subject merchandise covered by this
review.14 We intend to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries containing subject
merchandise exported by the companies
under review that we determine in the
final results to be part of the China-wide
entity at the China-wide entity rate of
234.51 percent. Commerce intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of this
review in the Federal Register.15
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
review for shipments of the subject
merchandise from China entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided by sections
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
10 See
19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR
351.303 (for general filing requirements).
12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
13 See 19 CFR 310(d).
14 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
15 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
11 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
companies that have a separate rate, the
cash deposit rate will be that established
in the final results of this review
(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis,
then zero cash deposit will be required);
(2) for previously investigated or
reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese
exporters not listed above that received
a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that for the China-wide entity (i.e.,
234.51 percent); and (4) for all nonChinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the Chinese
exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter. These deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act,
and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: September 24, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019–21441 Filed 10–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–931]
Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless
Pressure Pipe From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the
Expedited Second Sunset Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52459-52460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21441]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-928]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines
that the two companies subject to this administrative review are part
of the China-wide entity because neither filed a separate rate
application (SRA). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2018
through January 31, 2019. We invite interested parties to comment on
these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable October 2, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone at (202) 482-2243.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On February 8, 2019, Commerce published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on
uncovered innerspring units (innersprings) from the People's Republic
of China (China).\1\ In response, on February 28, 2019, Leggett &
Platt, Incorporated (the petitioner) requested a review of two
companies, Jietai Machinery Ltd. (HK) (Jietai) and Green Asia Parts,
LTD. (Green Asia).\2\ Commerce initiated a review for both companies on
May 2, 2019.\3\ The deadline for interested parties to submit an SRA or
separate rate certification (SRC) was June 3, 2019.\4\ No party
submitted an SRA or an SRC. On July 18, 2019, Commerce placed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data on the record of this review
demonstrating that neither Jietai nor Green Asia had entries during the
POR.\5\ We asked interested parties to file comments on this data and
submit comments by July 25, 2019. No party filed comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity to Request Administrative
Review, 84 FR 2816 (February 8, 2019).
\2\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Uncovered Innerspring Units from
the People's Republic of China: Request for Tenth Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review,'' dated February 28, 2019.
\3\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 84 FR 18777 (May 2, 2019) (Initiation
Notice).
\4\ See Initiation Notice.
\5\ See Memorandum, ``10th Administrative Review of Uncovered
Innerspring Units from the People's Republic of China: Customs Data
of U.S. Imports,'' dated July 18, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together in
sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin, twin
long, full, full long, queen, California king and king) and units used
in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. All
uncovered innerspring units are included in the scope regardless of
width and length. Included within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76 inches in width and 68 inches
to 84 inches in length. Innersprings for crib mattresses typically
range from 25 inches to 27 inches in width and 50 inches to 52 inches
in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings are typically joined together
with helical wire and border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings are
included in this definition regardless of whether they have border rods
attached to the perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are
individual coils covered by a ``pocket'' or ``sock'' of a nonwoven
synthetic material or woven material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 9404.29.9010
and have also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000,
9404.29.9005, 9404.29.9011, 7326.20.0070, 7326.20.0090, 7320.20.5010,
7320.90.5010, or 7326.20.0071 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS).\6\ The HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs
[[Page 52460]]
purposes only; the written description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Based on a recommendation by CBP, on September 6, 2017, the
Department added HTS 7326.20.0090 to the scope. See Memorandum,
``Request from Customs and Border Protection to Update the ACE AD/
CVD Case Reference File, Uncovered Innersprings from the People's
Republic of China (A-570-928) and South Africa (A-791-821),'' dated
September 6, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19
CFR 351.213.
Preliminary Results of Review
Neither of the companies subject to this review filed an SRA. Thus,
Commerce preliminarily determines that these companies have not
demonstrated their eligibility for separate rate status. As such,
Commerce preliminarily determines that the companies subject to review
are part of the China-wide entity. In addition, Commerce no longer
considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as an exporter
conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative review.\7\
Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless Commerce
specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the
NME entity.\8\ In this administrative review, no party requested a
review of the China-wide entity. Moreover, we have not self-initiated a
review of the China-wide entity. Because no review of the China-wide
entity is being conducted, the China-wide entity's entries are not
subject to the review and the rate applicable to the NME entity is not
subject to change as a result of this review. The China-wide entity
rate is 234.51 percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65970 (November 4,
2013).
\8\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should
specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters
comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names
of such exporters in their request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Comment
Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary
results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
within 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary
results of review.\9\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit in room B8024 of the main Commerce building. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed
within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\10\
Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a
brief summary of the argument, and a table of authorities.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii).
\10\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2).
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c) and (d); see also 19 CFR 351.303 (for
general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate
if one is requested, must submit a written request to Commerce within
30 days of the date of publication of this notice.\12\ Requests should
contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is
made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to
be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington DC 20230.\13\ Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review, which will include the results
of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120
days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c)
\13\ See 19 CFR 310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results of this review, Commerce will
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise covered by this review.\14\ We intend to
instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise
exported by the companies under review that we determine in the final
results to be part of the China-wide entity at the China-wide entity
rate of 234.51 percent. Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this
review in the Federal Register.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\15\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market
Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties,
76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the
subject merchandise from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by
sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For companies that have a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the
final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de
minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not listed
above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing
exporter-specific rate; (3) for all Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate,
the cash deposit rate will be that for the China-wide entity (i.e.,
234.51 percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the Chinese exporter that supplied
that non-Chinese exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 315.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these preliminary results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: September 24, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-21441 Filed 10-1-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P