Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (I); Institution of Investigation, 52125-52126 [2019-21300]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices operate), normal operating levels (hours per week/weeks per year), time for downtime, maintenance, repair, and cleanup, and a typical or representative product mix); and (c) the quantity and value of your firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise and, if known, an estimate of the percentage of total exports to the United States of Subject Merchandise from the Subject Country accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. (12) Identify significant changes, if any, in the supply and demand conditions or business cycle for the Domestic Like Product that have occurred in the United States or in the market for the Subject Merchandise in the Subject Country after 2013, and significant changes, if any, that are likely to occur within a reasonably foreseeable time. Supply conditions to consider include technology; production methods; development efforts; ability to increase production (including the shift of production facilities used for other products and the use, cost, or availability of major inputs into production); and factors related to the ability to shift supply among different national markets (including barriers to importation in foreign markets or changes in market demand abroad). Demand conditions to consider include end uses and applications; the existence and availability of substitute products; and the level of competition among the Domestic Like Product produced in the United States, Subject Merchandise produced in the Subject Country, and such merchandise from other countries. (13) (Optional) A statement of whether you agree with the above definitions of the Domestic Like Product and Domestic Industry; if you disagree with either or both of these definitions, please explain why and provide alternative definitions. jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES Authority: This proceeding is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.61 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 20, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–20882 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1176] Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (I); Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 26, 2019, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Globalfoundries U.S. Inc. of Santa Clara, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on September 13, 2019. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor devices, products containing the same, and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,912,603 (‘‘the ’603 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,750,418 (‘‘the ’418 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,936,986 (‘‘the ’986 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52125 Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2019). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 25, 2019, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–8, 10–13, and 15–19 of the ’603 patent; claims 27–31 of the ’418 patent; and claims 1–7, 12–13, and 15–16 of the ’986 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘semiconductor devices manufactured at the 28nm, 20nm, 16nm, 12nm, and 7nm process nodes and products containing same, and components thereof, which are field programmable gate arrays (including 3D ICs), adaptive compute acceleration platforms, systems on a chip (including MPSoCs and RFSoCs), modems, televisions, tablets, smart watches, development boards, USB accelerators, test boards, and smartphones’’; (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1 jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES 52126 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2019 / Notices Globalfoundries U.S. Inc., 2600 Great America Way, Santa Clara, CA 95054 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., No. 8, Li-Hsin Rd. VI, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan TSMC North America, 2851 Junction Avenue, San Jose, California 95134 MediaTek lnc., No. 1 Dusing 1st Rd., Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 20078, Taiwan MediaTek USA Inc., 2840 Junction Avenue, San Jose, California 95134 Qualcomm Inc., 5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California 92121–1714 Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Dr., San Jose, California 95124 Avnet, Inc., 2211 South 4 7th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Digi-Key Corporation, 701 Brooks Avenue South, Thief River Falls, Minnesota 56701 Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North Main Street, Mansfield, Texas 76063 TCL Corporation, Floor 22, TCL Technology Building, 17 Huifeng 3rd Rd., Zhongkai Hi-tech Development District, Huizhou, Guangdong 516006, P.R. China TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, TCL Multimedia Building, TCL International E City, No. 1001, Zhongshanyuan Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518052, P.R. China Hisense Co. Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17 Donghai West Road, South District, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China Hisense USA Corp., 7310 McGinnis Ferry Road, Suwanee, Georgia 20024 Hisense Import & Export Co. Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17 Donghai West Road, South District, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China Hisense Electric Co., Ltd., 218 Qianwangang Road, Economic Technology Dvpt Zone, Qingdao 266555, P.R. China Hisense International Co., Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17, Donghaixi Road, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China Hisense Group Co., Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17, Donghaixi Road, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China Qingdao Hisense Communication Co., Ltd., No. 18, Tuanjie Road, Huandao Information, Industry Park, Qingdao, Shandong 260071, P.R. China Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:10 Sep 30, 2019 Jkt 250001 Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 West Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago, Illinois 60654 BLU Products, 10814 NW 33rd Street, Doral, Florida 33172 OnePlus Technology Co., Ltd., 18F, Block C, Shenye Tairan Building, Tairan Eight Road, Chegongmiao, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518048, China (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 26, 2019. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2019–21300 Filed 9–30–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–502 and 731– TA–1227 (Review)] Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From Mexico and Turkey; Institution of FiveYear Reviews United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), as amended, to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel concrete reinforcing bar (‘‘rebar’’) from Mexico and the countervailing duty order on rebar from Turkey would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission. DATES: Instituted October 1, 2019. To be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is October 31, 2019. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by December 10, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this proceeding may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On November 6, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) issued an antidumping duty order on imports of rebar from Mexico (79 FR 65925) and a countervailing duty order on imports of rebar from Turkey (79 FR 65926). The Commission is conducting reviews pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), to determine whether revocation of the orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to the domestic industry within E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM 01OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52125-52126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1176]


Certain Semiconductor Devices, Products Containing the Same, and 
Components Thereof (I); Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 26, 2019, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Globalfoundries 
U.S. Inc. of Santa Clara, California. A supplement to the complaint was 
filed on September 13, 2019. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain semiconductor devices, products containing 
the same, and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,912,603 (``the '603 patent''); U.S. Patent 
No. 7,750,418 (``the '418 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,936,986 
(``the '986 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry 
in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal 
Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 112, Washington, 
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for institution of this 
investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2019).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on September 25, 2019, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1-8, 10-13, and 15-19 of the '603 patent; claims 27-31 of the 
'418 patent; and claims 1-7, 12-13, and 15-16 of the '986 patent; and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``semiconductor 
devices manufactured at the 28nm, 20nm, 16nm, 12nm, and 7nm process 
nodes and products containing same, and components thereof, which are 
field programmable gate arrays (including 3D ICs), adaptive compute 
acceleration platforms, systems on a chip (including MPSoCs and 
RFSoCs), modems, televisions, tablets, smart watches, development 
boards, USB accelerators, test boards, and smartphones'';
    (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties and other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), 
(f)(1), (g)(1);
    (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:


[[Page 52126]]


Globalfoundries U.S. Inc., 2600 Great America Way, Santa Clara, CA 
95054

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., No. 8, Li-Hsin Rd. VI, 
Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

TSMC North America, 2851 Junction Avenue, San Jose, California 95134

MediaTek lnc., No. 1 Dusing 1st Rd., Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 
20078, Taiwan

MediaTek USA Inc., 2840 Junction Avenue, San Jose, California 95134

Qualcomm Inc., 5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, California 92121-1714

Xilinx, Inc., 2100 Logic Dr., San Jose, California 95124

Avnet, Inc., 2211 South 4 7th Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85034

Digi-Key Corporation, 701 Brooks Avenue South, Thief River Falls, 
Minnesota 56701

Mouser Electronics, Inc., 1000 North Main Street, Mansfield, Texas 
76063

TCL Corporation, Floor 22, TCL Technology Building, 17 Huifeng 3rd Rd., 
Zhongkai Hi-tech Development District, Huizhou, Guangdong 516006, P.R. 
China

TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, TCL Multimedia Building, TCL 
International E City, No. 1001, Zhongshanyuan Road, Nanshan District, 
Shenzhen, Guangdong Province 518052, P.R. China

Hisense Co. Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17 Donghai West Road, South 
District, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China

Hisense USA Corp., 7310 McGinnis Ferry Road, Suwanee, Georgia 20024

Hisense Import & Export Co. Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17 Donghai West 
Road, South District, Qingdao 266071, P.R. China

Hisense Electric Co., Ltd., 218 Qianwangang Road, Economic Technology 
Dvpt Zone, Qingdao 266555, P.R. China

Hisense International Co., Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17, Donghaixi Road, 
Qingdao 266071, P.R. China

Hisense Group Co., Ltd., Hisense Tower, No. 17, Donghaixi Road, Qingdao 
266071, P.R. China

Qingdao Hisense Communication Co., Ltd., No. 18, Tuanjie Road, Huandao 
Information, Industry Park, Qingdao, Shandong 260071, P.R. China

Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043

Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 West Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago, 
Illinois 60654

BLU Products, 10814 NW 33rd Street, Doral, Florida 33172

OnePlus Technology Co., Ltd., 18F, Block C, Shenye Tairan Building, 
Tairan Eight Road, Chegongmiao, Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 
518048, China

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 26, 2019.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-21300 Filed 9-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.