Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Certain Clearing Editor Functionality in Rule 6.6 of the Shell Rulebook, 51693-51696 [2019-21103]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
requires 956,656 hours each year ((3,764
broker-dealers × 254 hours) + (200
broker-dealers × 3 hours) 1. These
burdens are recordkeeping burdens.
The staff believes that compliance
personnel would be charged with
ensuring compliance with Commission
regulation, including Rule 17a–4. The
staff estimates that the hourly salary of
a Compliance Clerk is $70 per hour.2
Based upon these numbers, the total
internal cost of compliance for 4,104
respondents is the dollar cost of
approximately $67 (956,656 yearly
hours × $70). The total burden hour
decrease of 86,210 is due to a decrease
in the number of respondents from
4,104 to 3,764.
Based on conversations with members
of the securities industry and the
Commission’s experience in the area,
the staff estimates that the average
broker-dealer spends approximately
$5,000 each year to store documents
required to be retained under Rule 17a–
4. Costs include the cost of physical
space, computer hardware and software,
etc., which vary widely depending on
the size of the broker-dealer and the
type of storage media employed. The
Commission estimates that the annual
reporting and recordkeeping cost
burden is $18,820,000. This cost is
calculated by the number of active,
registered broker-dealers multiplied by
the reporting and recordkeeping cost for
each respondent (3,764 active,
registered broker-dealers × $5,000).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view the background
documentation for this information
1 On June 5, 2019, the Commission adopted Rule
151–1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
establishing a standard of conduct for brokerdealers and natural persons who are associated
persons of a broker-dealer when making a
recommendation of any securities. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 86031 (June 5, 2019), 84
FR 33318 (July 12, 2019). At the same time, the
Commission adopted Exchange Act Rule 17a–14
(CFR 240.17a–14) and Form CRS (17 CFR 249.640)
under the Exchange Act. See Form CRS
Relationship Summary; Amendments to Form ADV
Exchange Act Release No. 86032, Advisers Act
Release No. 5247, File No. S7–08–18 (June 5, 2019),
84 FR 33492 (July 12, 2019). As part of new Rule
17a–14 and Form CRS, and Regulation Best Interest,
the Commission amended Rule 17a–4 by adding
new paragraphs (a)(24) and (a)(35). The collections
of information and the related burdens associated
with these amendments have been separately
noticed for comment and are currently under
review.
2 This figure is based on SIFMA’s Office Salaries
in the Securities Industry 2013, modified by
Commission staff to account for an 1,800-hour
work-year multiplied by 2.93 to account for
bonuses, firm size, employee benefits, and
overhead.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 27, 2019
Jkt 247001
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Lindsay.M.Abate@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Candace
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or by sending an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: September 24, 2019.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–21081 Filed 9–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–87079; File No. SR–CBOE–
2019–062]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Certain
Clearing Editor Functionality in Rule
6.6 of the Shell Rulebook
September 24, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 18, 2019, Cboe Exchange,
Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe
Options’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51693
certain Clearing Editor functionality in
Rule 6.6 of the shell Rulebook.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On September 5, 2019, the Exchange
filed a rule filing, SR–CBOE–2019–056,
which, amended Exchange Rules in
connection with the Cboe Trading
Match System (‘‘CTM’’).5 Pursuant to
SR–CBOE–2019–056, which will be
effective on October 7, 2019, the
Exchange proposed to harmonize
current Rule 6.67, in connection with
the CTM, with C2 Rule 6.31, which
provides for the ‘‘Clearing Editor’’ and
is functionally equivalent to the
Exchange’s current CTM. Under SR–
CBOE–2019–056, Rule 6.6 in the shell
Rulebook will govern the Exchange’s
Clearing Editor and Rule 6.67 will be
deleted from the current Rulebook,
upon migration.6 SR–CBOE–2019–056
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86920
(September 10, 2019) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Cboe Trade Match System) (SR–
CBOE–2019–056).
6 Cboe Options intends to migrate its trading
platform to the same system used by the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges (i.e., together with Cboe
Options, C2 Exchange, Inc. (‘‘C2’’), Cboe EDGA
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’), Cboe EDGX Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’ or ‘‘EDGX Options’’), Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘BZX Options’’), and
Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX’’)) which the
Exchange expects to complete on October 7, 2019.
In connection with this technology migration, the
Exchange has a shell Rulebook that resides
alongside its current Rulebook, which shell
Rulebook will contain the Rules that will be in
place upon completion of the Cboe Options
technology migration.
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
51694
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2019 / Notices
intended to amend the rule to conform
to the Clearing Editor functionality and
rule language of that of C2 to the extent
necessary to retain intended differences
unique to Cboe Options market-model,
functionality, and/or rule text. However,
the Exchange now proposes to update
Rule 6.6 in the shell Rulebook to
describe additional functionality that is
unique to the Exchange that was
inadvertently not included in that
previously filing. In order to coincide
with the effective date of SR–CBOE–
2019–056 and the migration of the
Exchange’s trading platform to the same
system used by the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges,7 the Exchange also intends
to implement this proposed rule change
on October 7, 2019.
In particular, the Exchange
inadvertently removed paragraph (b)
under current Rule 6.67, which
currently applies to both trades
executed electronically and in open
outcry, which is unique to Cboe
Options, and will continue to apply to
trades executed in open outcry upon
migration. Specifically, current Rule
6.67(b) permits Trading Permit Holders
(‘‘TPHs’’) to change certain fields in
CTM (Clearing Editor, as proposed),
including series, quantity, buy or sell,
and premium price, only if they provide
notice to the Exchange. While the
Exchange notes the removal this
provision as it relates to trades executed
electronically and in conformity with
C2 Rule 6.31 is accurate, it will continue
to apply to open outcry trades postmigration. Therefore, the Exchange now
proposes to amend Rule 6.6 in the shell
Rulebook and add Rule 6.6(d), which is
substantively the same as current Rule
6.67(b) that was inadvertently removed
under SR–CBOE–2019–056.
Specifically, proposed Rule 6.6(d) states
that, in addition to the fields listed in
paragraph (b), Trading Permit Holders
may change the following fields through
the Clearing Editor for trades executed
in open outcry: (1) Series, (2) Quantity,
(3) Buy or Sell; or (4) Price. Each of
these changes must be accompanied by
a Reason Code. Notification of changes
made pursuant to this paragraph (d) will
automatically be sent to the Exchange
with the submission of the changes
through the Clearing Editor. The
proposed rule change updates the
language to make it explicit that
proposed Rule 6.6(d) applies only to
trades executed in open outcry. It also
updates the term premium price to price
and Customer ID (in Rule 6.6(a)) to
Client Order ID, as these terms more
accurately reflect the names of the fields
7 See
id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 27, 2019
Jkt 247001
that are displayed on an order 8 and in
the Clearing Editor, as well as the term
origin code to Capacity code, which is
in line with the language in Rule 6.6
and definition currently in the shell
Rulebook.9 The current rule provides
that notification of the change shall be
made as soon as practicable, but no later
than 15 minutes after the change has
been made. The proposed rule change
does not incorporate this language
because, upon migration, the Exchange
will automatically receive notification
of changes to the fields listed under
proposed Rule 6.6(d) when a TPH
submits changes through use of the
Clearing Editor. The automatic
notification will include a Reason Code
associated with each change in which a
TPH will be prompted to provide in the
Clearing Editor when making changes
pursuant to proposed Rule 6.6(d).10
Therefore, the Exchange notes that the
proposed rule does not substantively
alter the notification requirement
attached to proposed Rule 6.6(d), but
only updates it to accurately reflect the
manner in which notice will
automatically be submitted to the
Exchange through use of the Clearing
Editor.
In addition, the proposed rule change
adds certain Cboe Options-specific
fields to the list of fields that do not
require a reason code under proposed
Rule 6.6(b). The Exchange now proposes
to incorporate Strategy ID,11 Frequent
Trader ID,12 Compression Trade ID,13
and ORS ID 14 to the list of fields that
a TPH may change through the Clearing
Editor (for both trades executed
electronically and in open outcry)
without notice to the Exchange. These
fields are unique to orders executed on
Cboe Options 15 and TPHs currently
8 See Cboe Options FIX Specifications, available
at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/
US_Options_FIX_Specification.pdf.
9 See Rule 1.1 in the shell Rulebook.
10 Example Reason Codes include: Input Error;
Unmatched Trade; Unknown; Manual Add; Other
Text Required; Trade Nullification; Trade
Adjustment; Error Account; and System Issue.
11 Strategy ID indicates whether an order qualifies
for certain treatment for various strategies provided
under the Exchange’s Fees Schedule. See Cboe
Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule (for example, footnote
13).
12 Frequent Trader ID is a unique identification
number which can be appended by executing
agents to orders submitted to the Exchange on
behalf of those customers registered for the
Frequent Trader Program. See Cboe Exchange, Inc.
Fees Schedule, ‘‘Frequent Trader Program’’ Table.
13 Compression Trader ID indicates whether an
order qualifies for certain treatment in connection
with facilitating a compression of options positions.
See Cboe Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule, footnote 41.
14 ORS ID indicates whether an order qualifies for
certain treatment under the ORS Program. See Cboe
Options Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule, ‘‘Order
Router Subsidy Program’’ Table.
15 See supra note 8.
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submit all updates to such fields to the
Exchange populated via a form postexecution today.16 Upon migration, the
Exchange functionality will allow for
automated entry for these fields, just
like all other order fields. Therefore, the
proposed amendment merely intends to
make it explicit that TPHs may continue
to submit updates to these fields postexecution. The Exchange also proposes
to clarify that a TPH may make a change
from a Capacity code (C) to any other
Capacity code only if the change is
accompanied by a Reason Code and,
like proposed paragraph (d), makes it
explicit that notice of such change will
automatically be sent to the Exchange
with the submission of the change
through the Clearing Editor. This is
substantially the same manner in which
current Rule 6.67 functions, where both
Rule 6.67(a) and (b) are applicable to
trades executed electronically and on
open outcry (therefore, changing a
customer Capacity code is permissible
under current Rule 6.67 for all trades
executed if notification is provided to
the Exchange). The Exchange proposes
to maintain that a TPH may change the
Capacity code from a customer Capacity
code to any other Capacity code for
trades executed electronically or in
open outcry, however, it still must
provide notification to the Exchange via
a prompted Reason Code and, like
changes made pursuant to proposed
paragraph (d), will automatically
provide such notification to the
Exchange when the change is submitted
through the Clearing Editor.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.17 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 18 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
16 The Exchange notes that TPHs may currently
update Frequent Trader ID via CTM. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 86617 (August 9, 2019),
84 FR 41776 (August 15, 2019) Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend the Ability To Submit Frequent Trader
Forms (SR–CBOE–2019–043).
17 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
18 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 19 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The proposed rule change is
substantively the same as the manner in
which the CTM rules and postexecution functionality and/or
processes work today. The proposed
change merely amends the rule
proposed under SR–CBOE–2019–056 to
permit changes in certain fields that
TPHs are already permitted to change
through the Clearing Editor or other
post-execution forms. The proposed
change is intended to correct an
inadvertent omission from Rule 6.6 in
the shell Rulebook of a provision from
Rule 6.67 in the current Rulebook that
currently applies to open outcry
executions, and will continue to apply
to open outcry executions upon
migration. Likewise, the Exchange notes
that TPHs may currently update fields
that require notification for trades
executed in open outcry and make
changes made from customer Capacity
code (C), with the same requisite notice.
Therefore, the proposed change does not
alter the manner in which the current
rule functions but instead removes
impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market
and national market system by
continuing to allow for these functions,
along with automatic notification
containing reason codes transmitted to
the Exchange through submission of the
changes in the Clearing Editor, upon
migration. Additionally, the Exchange
notes that the proposed amendment to
add certain fields for which updates do
not require notification to the rule will
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and national market system because
TPHs may already submit updates to
these fields (in paper form) postexecution and the rule is designed to
continue to allow TPHs to make such
updates post-execution in electronic
form upon migration.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
19 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 27, 2019
Jkt 247001
proposed amendment merely updates
Rule 6.6 in the shell Rulebook to
continue to allow for certain postexecution changes, which are currently
permitted on the Exchange, through the
use of the Clearing Editor after October
7, 2019. The Exchange notes that all
proposed changes and current changes
made pursuant to Rule 6.6 occur postexecution, therefore will not have any
impact on trading. As the same postexecution changes are already permitted
and made via processes and
functionality currently in place on the
Exchange, the Exchange believes this
proposed filing to allow for the
continuation of the same post-execution
changes through use of the Clearing
Editor will have no impact on
competition. The Exchange also notes
that the proposed change is intended to
reduce the compliance burden on TPHs
by providing them with functionality
that allows for automatic input and
notification to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 20 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.21
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 22 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 23
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
20 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
22 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
21 17
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51695
operative delay. The Exchange believes
that waiver of the operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because, as the Exchange discussed
above, its proposal complements its
recent filing, SR–CBOE–2019–056, in
which it conformed the rule governing
the Clearing Editor to that of C2 but
inadvertently omitted from that
proposal current Cboe-specific
provisions that the Exchange wishes to
maintain post migration. Accordingly,
its proposal is designed to preserve
current functionality in order to
continue to permit TPHs to make certain
post-execution changes after October 7,
2019 through the use of the Clearing
Editor. The Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because the proposal does not raise any
new or novel issues, and waiver will
allow the changes in this filing to align
with the proposed amendments to Rule
6.6 that the Exchange adopted pursuant
to SR–CBOE–2019–056, thereby
minimizing disruptions to TPHs and
their customers with respect to postexecution functionality and processes
available on the Exchange. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the
proposal as operative upon filing.24
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
24 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission also has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
51696
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2019 / Notices
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2019–062 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–062. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2019–062 and
should be submitted on or before
October 21, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.25
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–21103 Filed 9–27–19; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
25 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:16 Sep 27, 2019
Jkt 247001
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736.
Extension:
Rule 10b–10, SEC File No. 270–389, OMB
Control No. 3235–0444.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 10b–10 (17 CFR 240.10b–10) under
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 10b–10 requires broker-dealers
to convey specified information to
customers regarding their securities
transactions. This information includes
the date and time of the transaction, the
identity and number of shares bought or
sold, and whether the broker-dealer acts
as agent for the customer or as principal
for its own account. Depending on
whether the broker-dealer acts as agent
or principal, Rule 10b–10 requires the
disclosure of commissions, as well as
mark-up and mark-down information.
For transactions in debt securities, Rule
10b–10 requires the disclosure of
redemption and yield information. Rule
10b–10 potentially applies to all of the
approximately 3,750 firms registered
with the Commission that effect
transactions for or with customers.
Based on information provided by
registered broker-dealers to the
Commission in FOCUS Reports, the
Commission staff estimates that on
average, registered broker-dealers
process approximately 18,843,624,843
order tickets per year for transactions for
or with customers. Each order ticket
representing a transaction effected for or
with a customer generally results in one
confirmation. Therefore, the
Commission staff estimates that
approximately 18,843,624,843
confirmations are sent to customers
annually. The confirmations required by
Rule 10b–10 are generally processed
through automated systems. It takes
approximately 30 seconds to generate
and send a confirmation. Accordingly,
the Commission staff estimates that
broker-dealers spend approximately
157,030,207 hours per year complying
with Rule 10b–10 (18,843,624,843 × .5
÷ 60).
The amount of confirmations sent and
the cost of sending each confirmation
varies from firm to firm. Smaller firms
generally send fewer confirmations than
larger firms because they effect fewer
transactions. The Commission staff
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
estimates the costs of producing and
sending a paper confirmation, including
postage, to be approximately 63 cents.
The Commission staff also estimates
that the cost of producing and sending
a wholly electronic confirmation is
approximately 39 cents. Based on
informal discussions with industry
participants, as well as representations
made in requests for exemptive and noaction letters relating to Rule 10b–10,
the staff estimates that broker-dealers
used electronic confirmations for
approximately 35 percent of
transactions. Based on these
calculations, Commission staff estimates
that 12,248,356,148 paper confirmations
are mailed each year at a cost of
$7,716,464,373. Commission staff also
estimates that 6,595,268,695 wholly
electronic confirmations are sent each
year at a cost of $2,572,154,791.
Accordingly, Commission staff
estimates that the total annual cost
associated with generating and
delivering to investors the information
required under Rule 10b–10 would be
$10,288,619,164.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Lindsay.M.Abate@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
Charles Riddle, Acting Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Candace
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549, or by sending an email to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: September 24, 2019.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–21083 Filed 9–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public
TIME AND DATE:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51693-51696]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21103]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-87079; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-062]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Certain Clearing Editor Functionality in Rule 6.6 of the Shell Rulebook
September 24, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 18, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend certain Clearing Editor functionality in Rule 6.6 of the shell
Rulebook.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On September 5, 2019, the Exchange filed a rule filing, SR-CBOE-
2019-056, which, amended Exchange Rules in connection with the Cboe
Trading Match System (``CTM'').\5\ Pursuant to SR-CBOE-2019-056, which
will be effective on October 7, 2019, the Exchange proposed to
harmonize current Rule 6.67, in connection with the CTM, with C2 Rule
6.31, which provides for the ``Clearing Editor'' and is functionally
equivalent to the Exchange's current CTM. Under SR-CBOE-2019-056, Rule
6.6 in the shell Rulebook will govern the Exchange's Clearing Editor
and Rule 6.67 will be deleted from the current Rulebook, upon
migration.\6\ SR-CBOE-2019-056
[[Page 51694]]
intended to amend the rule to conform to the Clearing Editor
functionality and rule language of that of C2 to the extent necessary
to retain intended differences unique to Cboe Options market-model,
functionality, and/or rule text. However, the Exchange now proposes to
update Rule 6.6 in the shell Rulebook to describe additional
functionality that is unique to the Exchange that was inadvertently not
included in that previously filing. In order to coincide with the
effective date of SR-CBOE-2019-056 and the migration of the Exchange's
trading platform to the same system used by the Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges,\7\ the Exchange also intends to implement this proposed rule
change on October 7, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86920 (September 10,
2019) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to the Cboe Trade Match System) (SR-CBOE-2019-
056).
\6\ Cboe Options intends to migrate its trading platform to the
same system used by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges (i.e., together
with Cboe Options, C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), Cboe EDGA Exchange,
Inc. (``EDGA''), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or ``EDGX
Options''), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or ``BZX Options''),
and Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'')) which the Exchange expects to
complete on October 7, 2019. In connection with this technology
migration, the Exchange has a shell Rulebook that resides alongside
its current Rulebook, which shell Rulebook will contain the Rules
that will be in place upon completion of the Cboe Options technology
migration.
\7\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange inadvertently removed paragraph (b)
under current Rule 6.67, which currently applies to both trades
executed electronically and in open outcry, which is unique to Cboe
Options, and will continue to apply to trades executed in open outcry
upon migration. Specifically, current Rule 6.67(b) permits Trading
Permit Holders (``TPHs'') to change certain fields in CTM (Clearing
Editor, as proposed), including series, quantity, buy or sell, and
premium price, only if they provide notice to the Exchange. While the
Exchange notes the removal this provision as it relates to trades
executed electronically and in conformity with C2 Rule 6.31 is
accurate, it will continue to apply to open outcry trades post-
migration. Therefore, the Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 6.6 in
the shell Rulebook and add Rule 6.6(d), which is substantively the same
as current Rule 6.67(b) that was inadvertently removed under SR-CBOE-
2019-056. Specifically, proposed Rule 6.6(d) states that, in addition
to the fields listed in paragraph (b), Trading Permit Holders may
change the following fields through the Clearing Editor for trades
executed in open outcry: (1) Series, (2) Quantity, (3) Buy or Sell; or
(4) Price. Each of these changes must be accompanied by a Reason Code.
Notification of changes made pursuant to this paragraph (d) will
automatically be sent to the Exchange with the submission of the
changes through the Clearing Editor. The proposed rule change updates
the language to make it explicit that proposed Rule 6.6(d) applies only
to trades executed in open outcry. It also updates the term premium
price to price and Customer ID (in Rule 6.6(a)) to Client Order ID, as
these terms more accurately reflect the names of the fields that are
displayed on an order \8\ and in the Clearing Editor, as well as the
term origin code to Capacity code, which is in line with the language
in Rule 6.6 and definition currently in the shell Rulebook.\9\ The
current rule provides that notification of the change shall be made as
soon as practicable, but no later than 15 minutes after the change has
been made. The proposed rule change does not incorporate this language
because, upon migration, the Exchange will automatically receive
notification of changes to the fields listed under proposed Rule 6.6(d)
when a TPH submits changes through use of the Clearing Editor. The
automatic notification will include a Reason Code associated with each
change in which a TPH will be prompted to provide in the Clearing
Editor when making changes pursuant to proposed Rule 6.6(d).\10\
Therefore, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule does not
substantively alter the notification requirement attached to proposed
Rule 6.6(d), but only updates it to accurately reflect the manner in
which notice will automatically be submitted to the Exchange through
use of the Clearing Editor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Cboe Options FIX Specifications, available at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/US_Options_FIX_Specification.pdf.
\9\ See Rule 1.1 in the shell Rulebook.
\10\ Example Reason Codes include: Input Error; Unmatched Trade;
Unknown; Manual Add; Other Text Required; Trade Nullification; Trade
Adjustment; Error Account; and System Issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the proposed rule change adds certain Cboe Options-
specific fields to the list of fields that do not require a reason code
under proposed Rule 6.6(b). The Exchange now proposes to incorporate
Strategy ID,\11\ Frequent Trader ID,\12\ Compression Trade ID,\13\ and
ORS ID \14\ to the list of fields that a TPH may change through the
Clearing Editor (for both trades executed electronically and in open
outcry) without notice to the Exchange. These fields are unique to
orders executed on Cboe Options \15\ and TPHs currently submit all
updates to such fields to the Exchange populated via a form post-
execution today.\16\ Upon migration, the Exchange functionality will
allow for automated entry for these fields, just like all other order
fields. Therefore, the proposed amendment merely intends to make it
explicit that TPHs may continue to submit updates to these fields post-
execution. The Exchange also proposes to clarify that a TPH may make a
change from a Capacity code (C) to any other Capacity code only if the
change is accompanied by a Reason Code and, like proposed paragraph
(d), makes it explicit that notice of such change will automatically be
sent to the Exchange with the submission of the change through the
Clearing Editor. This is substantially the same manner in which current
Rule 6.67 functions, where both Rule 6.67(a) and (b) are applicable to
trades executed electronically and on open outcry (therefore, changing
a customer Capacity code is permissible under current Rule 6.67 for all
trades executed if notification is provided to the Exchange). The
Exchange proposes to maintain that a TPH may change the Capacity code
from a customer Capacity code to any other Capacity code for trades
executed electronically or in open outcry, however, it still must
provide notification to the Exchange via a prompted Reason Code and,
like changes made pursuant to proposed paragraph (d), will
automatically provide such notification to the Exchange when the change
is submitted through the Clearing Editor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Strategy ID indicates whether an order qualifies for
certain treatment for various strategies provided under the
Exchange's Fees Schedule. See Cboe Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule (for
example, footnote 13).
\12\ Frequent Trader ID is a unique identification number which
can be appended by executing agents to orders submitted to the
Exchange on behalf of those customers registered for the Frequent
Trader Program. See Cboe Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule, ``Frequent
Trader Program'' Table.
\13\ Compression Trader ID indicates whether an order qualifies
for certain treatment in connection with facilitating a compression
of options positions. See Cboe Exchange, Inc. Fees Schedule,
footnote 41.
\14\ ORS ID indicates whether an order qualifies for certain
treatment under the ORS Program. See Cboe Options Exchange, Inc.
Fees Schedule, ``Order Router Subsidy Program'' Table.
\15\ See supra note 8.
\16\ The Exchange notes that TPHs may currently update Frequent
Trader ID via CTM. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86617
(August 9, 2019), 84 FR 41776 (August 15, 2019) Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Ability To Submit Frequent Trader Forms (SR-CBOE-2019-043).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\17\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \18\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in
[[Page 51695]]
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) \19\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change is substantively the same as the manner in
which the CTM rules and post-execution functionality and/or processes
work today. The proposed change merely amends the rule proposed under
SR-CBOE-2019-056 to permit changes in certain fields that TPHs are
already permitted to change through the Clearing Editor or other post-
execution forms. The proposed change is intended to correct an
inadvertent omission from Rule 6.6 in the shell Rulebook of a provision
from Rule 6.67 in the current Rulebook that currently applies to open
outcry executions, and will continue to apply to open outcry executions
upon migration. Likewise, the Exchange notes that TPHs may currently
update fields that require notification for trades executed in open
outcry and make changes made from customer Capacity code (C), with the
same requisite notice. Therefore, the proposed change does not alter
the manner in which the current rule functions but instead removes
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and
national market system by continuing to allow for these functions,
along with automatic notification containing reason codes transmitted
to the Exchange through submission of the changes in the Clearing
Editor, upon migration. Additionally, the Exchange notes that the
proposed amendment to add certain fields for which updates do not
require notification to the rule will remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and national market system
because TPHs may already submit updates to these fields (in paper form)
post-execution and the rule is designed to continue to allow TPHs to
make such updates post-execution in electronic form upon migration.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed amendment merely
updates Rule 6.6 in the shell Rulebook to continue to allow for certain
post-execution changes, which are currently permitted on the Exchange,
through the use of the Clearing Editor after October 7, 2019. The
Exchange notes that all proposed changes and current changes made
pursuant to Rule 6.6 occur post-execution, therefore will not have any
impact on trading. As the same post-execution changes are already
permitted and made via processes and functionality currently in place
on the Exchange, the Exchange believes this proposed filing to allow
for the continuation of the same post-execution changes through use of
the Clearing Editor will have no impact on competition. The Exchange
also notes that the proposed change is intended to reduce the
compliance burden on TPHs by providing them with functionality that
allows for automatic input and notification to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \20\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\21\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \22\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \23\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest because, as the
Exchange discussed above, its proposal complements its recent filing,
SR-CBOE-2019-056, in which it conformed the rule governing the Clearing
Editor to that of C2 but inadvertently omitted from that proposal
current Cboe-specific provisions that the Exchange wishes to maintain
post migration. Accordingly, its proposal is designed to preserve
current functionality in order to continue to permit TPHs to make
certain post-execution changes after October 7, 2019 through the use of
the Clearing Editor. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because the proposal does not raise any new or novel
issues, and waiver will allow the changes in this filing to align with
the proposed amendments to Rule 6.6 that the Exchange adopted pursuant
to SR-CBOE-2019-056, thereby minimizing disruptions to TPHs and their
customers with respect to post-execution functionality and processes
available on the Exchange. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the proposal as operative upon
filing.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\24\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
[[Page 51696]]
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-062 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-062. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-062 and should be submitted on
or before October 21, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-21103 Filed 9-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P