Respirable Silica (Quartz), 51075-51076 [2019-20751]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2019 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Volume Curve Normal Standards,
Variability, and Effects of Age, 113 Am.
Rev. of Respir. Disease 587 (1976)
(‘‘Knudson 1976’’). See 45 FR 13711.
OWCP is considering developing new
tables based on reference values in one
of two more recent studies: (1) John L.
Hankinson, et al., Spirometric Reference
Values from a Sample of the General
U.S. Population, 159 Am. J. of Respir. &
Critical Care Med. 179 (1999)
(‘‘NHANES III’’); or (2) Philip H.
Quanjer, et al., Multi-Ethnic Reference
Values for Spirometry for the 3–95-Year
Age Range: The Global Lung Function
2012 Equations, 40 Eur. Respir. J. 1324
(2012) (‘‘GLI 2012’’).
9. Is either (or both) of these sets of
reference values superior to the
Knudson 1976 values? Why?
10. Which of these two sets of
reference values is better suited to
evaluating respiratory disability in coal
miners? Why?
11. Are there other sets of reference
values OWCP should consider?
C. Arterial Blood Gas Studies—Test
Administration
12. Should OWCP require facilities
administering ABG studies and
analyzing samples to either have a
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) certificate
or be CLIA-exempt? See 42 CFR 493.2.
13. Should OWCP require the use of
plastic syringes instead of glass
syringes? If plastic syringes are used,
should OWCP prohibit icing blood
samples prior to analysis? See, e.g.,
Thomas P. Knowles, et al., Effects of
Syringe Material, Sample Storage Time,
and Temperature on Blood Gases and
Oxygen Saturation in Arterialized
Human Blood Samples, 51 Resp. Care
732 (2006); Gregg L. Ruppel, Of Time
and Temperature, Plastic and Glass:
Specimen Handling in the Blood-Gas
Laboratory, 51 Resp. Care 717 (2006).
14. Should OWCP require that a blood
sample be analyzed within a certain
time period of the sample being drawn
for the result to be considered valid, and
if so, what should that time period be?
See id.
15. Currently, § 718.105(b) provides
that if an exercise ABG study is
conducted, ‘‘blood shall be drawn
during exercise.’’ Should OWCP allow
pulse oximetry measurements (SpO2) to
be used in lieu of a blood draw during
exercise? See, e.g., 20 CFR part 404,
subpart P, appendix 1, part A, Listing
3.02C (allowing chronic impairment of
gas exchange to be demonstrated
through ABG test or pulse oximetry
results).
16. Currently, appendix C to part 718
provides that ABG tests ‘‘must not be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Sep 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
performed during or soon after an acute
respiratory or cardiac illness.’’ Should
OWCP further define this requirement?
If so, how should it be defined?
17. What are the costs, benefits, and
the technological and economic
feasibility of these suggested changes to
ABG administration standards?
D. Arterial Blood Gas Studies—
Qualifying Disability Criteria
18. Do the Tables in Appendix C need
to be revised? If so, what criteria should
OWCP consider and why?
51075
Dated: September 18, 2019.
Julia K. Hearthway,
Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2019–20851 Filed 9–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CR–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 56, 57, 70, 71, 72, and 90
[Docket No. MSHA–2016–0013]
RIN 1219–AB36
E. Pulse Oximetry (SpO2)
19. Should OWCP adopt test
administration standards for pulse
oximetry? If so, what standards should
OWCP consider adopting and why? See,
e.g., 20 CFR part 404, subpart P,
appendix 1, part A, Listing 3.00H1–2.
20. Are there SpO2 values that would
establish total respiratory disability in a
coal miner under the BLBA absent
contrary probative evidence? If so, what
values should OWCP consider and why?
21. Should OWCP require a threshold
measurement of a miner’s oxygen
saturation level through pulse oximetry
before determining whether more
invasive testing such as an ABG is
necessary? If so, what should the
threshold be? What are the advantages
and disadvantages (including potential
costs or benefits) of adopting such a
threshold measurement?
F. Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for
Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)
22. Should OWCP adopt test
administration standards for DLCO
testing? If so, what standards should
OWCP consider adopting and why? See,
e.g., Brian L. Graham, et al., 2017 ERS/
ATS Standards for Single-Breath
Carbon Monoxide Uptake in the Lung
(2017); 20 CFR part 404, subpart P,
appendix 1, part A, Listing 3.00F1–3.
23. Are there DLCO values that would
establish total respiratory disability in a
coal miner under the BLBA absent
contrary probative evidence? If so, what
values should OWCP consider and why?
G. Other Information
24. Please provide any other data or
information that may be useful to OWCP
in evaluating its quality standards and
related disability criteria, including
whether there are other tests of
respiratory disability for which quality
standards or qualifying disability
criteria should be developed.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Respirable Silica (Quartz)
Mine Safety and Health
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Announcement of public
meeting and correction.
AGENCY:
The Mine Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) is announcing
the date and location of a public
meeting on the Agency’s Request for
Information on Respirable Silica
(Quartz). In addition, this document
corrects a typographical error included
in the Request for Information that
published on August 29, 2019.
DATES: The meeting date and location is
listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Comments must be received or
postmarked by midnight Eastern
Daylight Saving time on October 28,
2019.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments and
informational materials, identified by
Docket No. MSHA–2016–0013, by one
of the following methods:
• Federal E-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: zzMSHA-comments@
dol.gov.
• Email: GoodGuidance@dol.gov.
• Mail: MSHA, Office of Standards,
Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia 22202–5452.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 201 12th
Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington,
Virginia, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. Sign in at the
receptionist’s desk on the 4th floor East,
Suite 4E401.
• Fax: 202–693–9441.
Instructions: All submissions must
include Docket No. MSHA–2016–0013.
Do not include personal information
that you do not want publicly disclosed.
Email Notification: To subscribe to
receive email notification when MSHA
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
51076
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2019 / Proposed Rules
publishes rulemaking documents in the
Federal Register, go to https://
public.govdelivery.com/accounts/
USDOL/subscriber/new.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or https://
arlweb.msha.gov/currentcomments.asp.
To read background documents, go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Review the
docket in person at MSHA, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
201 12th Street South, Arlington,
Virginia, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
Holidays. Sign in at the receptionist’s
desk in Suite 4E401. [Docket Number:
MSHA–2016–0013]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila A. McConnell, Director, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances,
MSHA, at mcconnell.sheila.a@dol.gov
(email), 202–693–9440 (voice), or 202–
693–9441 (fax). These are not toll-free
numbers.
David G. Zatezalo,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety
and Health Administration.
[FR Doc. 2019–20751 Filed 9–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520–43–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2019–0093]
RIN 2127–AL37
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards; Occupant Crash Protection
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM).
I. Public Meeting
SUMMARY:
MSHA will hold a public meeting on
the Agency’s Request for Information on
Respirable Silica (Quartz) to receive
input from industry, labor, and other
interested parties. The public meeting
will be held on October 17, 2019, at
MSHA Headquarters, 201 12th Street
South, Arlington, Virginia 22202–5452.
The public meeting will begin at 9 a.m.
local time and conclude at 5 p.m., or
until the last speaker speaks. The
meeting will be conducted in an
informal manner. Presenters and
attendees may provide written
information to the court reporter for
inclusion in the record. MSHA will
make the transcript of the meeting
available at https://www.regulations.gov
and on MSHA’s website at: https://
arlweb.msha.gov/currentcomments.asp.
II. Correction
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50
mg/m3 (ISO).11’’
MSHA’s Request for Information,
which published in the issue of August
29, 2019, at 84 FR 45452, included a
typographical error.
On page 45453, in the first paragraph,
in the third column, the last sentence is
revised to read: ‘‘In 2016, the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) amended
MSHA’s existing respirable crystalline
silica standards to establish a
permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50
mg/m3 (ISO).11’’ The sentence should
read, ‘‘In 2016, the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA)
amended OSHA’s existing respirable
crystalline silica standards to establish a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:39 Sep 26, 2019
Jkt 247001
AGENCY:
The Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012
directs NHTSA to initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to amend Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208,
‘‘Occupant crash protection,’’ to require
a seat belt use warning system for rear
seats. NHTSA initiated a rulemaking
proceeding in 2013, and as it continues
with this proceeding NHTSA is seeking
public comment on a variety of issues
related to a requirement for a rear seat
belt warning system. NHTSA seeks
comment on, among other things,
potential requirements for such systems,
the vehicles to which they should
apply, their effectiveness, the likely
consumer acceptance, and the
associated costs and benefits.
DATES: You should submit your
comments early enough to be received
not later than November 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to the docket number identified in the
heading of this document by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
11 Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA). 2016. Occupational Exposure to Respirable
Crystalline Silica—Final Rule. 81 FR 16286.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act discussion
below. We will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments filed after the
closing date.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone:
(202) 366–9826.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000, (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Confidential Business Information: If
you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, you should
submit two copies, from which you
have deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to the Docket at
the address given above. When you send
a comment containing information
claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR part
512).
You
may contact Ms. Carla Rush, Office of
Crashworthiness Standards, Telephone:
202–366–4583, Facsimile: 202–493–
2739 or Mr. John Piazza, Office of Chief
Counsel, Telephone: 202–366–2992,
Facsimile: 202–366–3820. You may
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\27SEP1.SGM
27SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51075-51076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20751]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Mine Safety and Health Administration
30 CFR Parts 56, 57, 70, 71, 72, and 90
[Docket No. MSHA-2016-0013]
RIN 1219-AB36
Respirable Silica (Quartz)
AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Announcement of public meeting and correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) is announcing
the date and location of a public meeting on the Agency's Request for
Information on Respirable Silica (Quartz). In addition, this document
corrects a typographical error included in the Request for Information
that published on August 29, 2019.
DATES: The meeting date and location is listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document. Comments must be received or
postmarked by midnight Eastern Daylight Saving time on October 28,
2019.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments and informational materials, identified by
Docket No. MSHA-2016-0013, by one of the following methods:
Federal E-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected].
Email: [email protected].
Mail: MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations, and
Variances, 201 12th Street South, Suite 4E401, Arlington, Virginia
22202-5452.
Hand Delivery or Courier: 201 12th Street South, Suite
4E401, Arlington, Virginia, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Sign in at the receptionist's
desk on the 4th floor East, Suite 4E401.
Fax: 202-693-9441.
Instructions: All submissions must include Docket No. MSHA-2016-
0013. Do not include personal information that you do not want publicly
disclosed.
Email Notification: To subscribe to receive email notification when
MSHA
[[Page 51076]]
publishes rulemaking documents in the Federal Register, go to https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDOL/subscriber/new.
Docket: For access to the docket to read comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov or https://arlweb.msha.gov/currentcomments.asp. To read background documents, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Review the docket in person at MSHA, Office of
Standards, Regulations, and Variances, 201 12th Street South,
Arlington, Virginia, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Sign in at the receptionist's desk in Suite
4E401. [Docket Number: MSHA-2016-0013]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila A. McConnell, Director, Office
of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at
[email protected] (email), 202-693-9440 (voice), or 202-693-
9441 (fax). These are not toll-free numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Meeting
MSHA will hold a public meeting on the Agency's Request for
Information on Respirable Silica (Quartz) to receive input from
industry, labor, and other interested parties. The public meeting will
be held on October 17, 2019, at MSHA Headquarters, 201 12th Street
South, Arlington, Virginia 22202-5452. The public meeting will begin at
9 a.m. local time and conclude at 5 p.m., or until the last speaker
speaks. The meeting will be conducted in an informal manner. Presenters
and attendees may provide written information to the court reporter for
inclusion in the record. MSHA will make the transcript of the meeting
available at https://www.regulations.gov and on MSHA's website at:
https://arlweb.msha.gov/currentcomments.asp.
II. Correction
MSHA's Request for Information, which published in the issue of
August 29, 2019, at 84 FR 45452, included a typographical error.
On page 45453, in the first paragraph, in the third column, the
last sentence is revised to read: ``In 2016, the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) amended MSHA's existing respirable
crystalline silica standards to establish a permissible exposure limit
(PEL) of 50 [micro]g/m\3\ (ISO).\11\'' The sentence should read, ``In
2016, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) amended
OSHA's existing respirable crystalline silica standards to establish a
permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 [micro]g/m\3\ (ISO).\11\''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 2016.
Occupational Exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica--Final Rule.
81 FR 16286.
David G. Zatezalo,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Mine Safety and Health Administration.
[FR Doc. 2019-20751 Filed 9-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4520-43-P