Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend the Fee Schedule Applicable to Members and Non-Members of the Exchange Pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c), 45606-45608 [2019-18634]

Download as PDF 45606 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2019 / Notices [FR Doc. 2019–18618 Filed 8–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–86743; File No. SR– CboeEDGX–2019–052] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend the Fee Schedule Applicable to Members and Non-Members of the Exchange Pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c) August 23, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 16, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change to amend the fee schedule applicable to Members and non-Members 3 of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal are effective upon filing. The text of the proposed rule change is attached [sic] as Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 A Member is defined as ‘‘any registered broker or dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n). 2 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Aug 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule applicable to its options trading platform (‘‘EDGX Options’’) to adopt a fee for the equity leg of a stockoption order, which orders would yield fee code ‘‘EQ’’, effective August 16, 2019. The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the Exchange is only one of 16 options venues to which market participants may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information, no single options exchange has more than 20% of the market share.4 Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no single options exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of option order flow. The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the Exchange’s transaction fees, and market participants can readily trade on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues to be more favorable. In response to competitive pricing, the Exchange, like other options exchanges, offers rebates and assesses fees for certain order types executed on or routed through the Exchange. Pursuant to rule filing SR–2019– CboeEDGX–039,5 the Exchange will 4 See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Volume Summary (August 15, 2019), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_ statistics/. 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86353 (July 11, 2019), 84 FR 34230 (July 17, 2019) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Add Stock-Option Order Functionality and Complex Qualified Contingent PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 implement stock-option order functionality on August 16, 2019. Stockoption orders are complex instruments that constitute the purchase or sale of a stated number of units of an underlying stock or a security convertible into the underlying stock coupled with the purchase or sale of an option contract(s) on the opposite side of the market and execute in the same manner as complex orders. Through this new functionality, the stock portions of stock-option strategy orders will be electronically communicated by the Exchange to a designated broker-dealer, who will then manage the execution of such stock portions. In connection with the new functionality, the Exchange proposes to adopt a stock handling fee of $0.0010 per share for the processing and routing by the Exchange of the stock portion of stock-option strategy orders executed through those mechanisms. The purpose of the proposed stock handling fee is to cover the fees charges by the outside venue that prints the trade, as well as assist in covering the Exchange’s costs in matching these stock-option orders against other stock option orders on the complex book. Additionally, the Exchange will also largely pass through to Members the fees assessed to the Exchange by the designated broker that will be managing the execution of these stock portions of stock-option strategy orders. The Exchange notes that other exchanges have likewise implemented fees for stock portions of stock-option strategy order in response to their respective implementations of stockoption strategy order functionality.6 Moreover, the proposed fee is identical to fees assessed by other options exchanges, including that of its affiliated exchange, Cboe Options, for stock legs executed as a part of stockoption strategy orders.7 Cross (‘‘QCC’’) Order With Stock Functionality, and To Make Other Changes to its Rules) (SR– CboeEDGX–2019–039). 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85909 (May 21, 2019), 84 FR 24587 (May 28, 2019) (SR– EMERALD–2019–21); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83788 (August 7, 2018), 83 FR 40110 (August 13, 2018) (SR–MIAX–2018–18); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67383 (July 10, 2012), 77 FR 41841 (July 16, 2012) (SR–CBOE– 2012–063). 7 See NASDAQ ISE Options Pricing Schedule, Section 4.12; NASDAQ MRX Options Pricing Schedule, Section 4(1); MIAX Emerald Fee Schedule, Section 1(a)(vi); MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Section 1(a)(x); and Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Stock Portion of Stock-Option Strategy Orders (each exchange charges the same fee of $0.0010 per share and capped at $50 per order). The Exchange notes that at this time it does not have the functionality available to impose a cap per order. The Exchange intends to have this functionality in place by Quarter 1 of 2020. The Exchange also does not believe that the absence of a cap prior to this timeframe will impact market E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM 29AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2019 / Notices khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6 of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the requirements of Section 6(b)(4),9 in particular, as it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that its proposed change to assess a charge for stock portions of stock-option strategy orders processed and routed through the Exchange transactions is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act in that the proposal is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory. The Exchange believes the proposed stock handling fee for stock-option orders is reasonable and equitable as the proposed fee will cover the costs of developing and maintaining the systems that allow for the matching and processing of the stock legs of stockoption orders executed in the complex order book, as well as all fees charged by the outside venue that prints the trade. The Exchange also believes it is reasonable and equitable to largely pass through to the Member any fees assessed by the routing broker-dealer utilized by the Exchange with respect to the execution of the stock leg of any such order. The Exchange notes that other exchanges assess the same fee for participants as the stock-option strategy functionality will be new, thus large trades and large volume executed through such orders will take some time to gain traction on the Exchange, and, the Exchange notes that a majority of large complex orders executed on the Exchange are currently executed through its complex order auctions and QCC (including QCC with stock). The fee codes appended to these order types do not impose a cap. 8 15 U.S.C. 78f. 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Aug 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 stock components of stock option strategies for the purposes of covering similar costs.10 The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee for the stock legs of a stock-option strategy order is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will be uniformly applied to all Members that execute stock-option orders in the complex order book on the Exchange. As noted, the proposed fee is identical to fees assessed by other options exchanges for stock legs executed as a part of stock-option strategy orders.11 As such, stock-option strategy orders are available on other options exchanges and participants can readily direct order flow to another exchange if they deem other exchanges’ fees to be more favorable. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impose any burden on intramarket competitions that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed change will apply uniformly to the stock portions of all market participants’ stock-option strategy orders. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on and direct their order flow, including 15 other options exchanges. Based on publicly available information, no single options exchange has more than 20% of the market share.12 Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of option order flow. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. The proposed fee is substantially similar to fees charged for stock components of stock-option 10 See supra note 6. supra note 7. 12 See supra note 4. 11 See PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 45607 strategy orders by the Exchange’s affiliate, Cboe Options, and other competing exchanges,13 therefore, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change appropriately reflects this competitive environment. Indeed, participants can readily choose to send their orders to other exchanges, and, additionally off-exchange venues, if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the market system ‘‘has been remarkably successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors and listed companies.’’ 14 The fact that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is ‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for execution’; [and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted’ because ‘no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker dealers’. . ..’’.15 Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change imposes any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 13 See supra note 6. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005). 15 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782– 83 (December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)). 14 See E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM 29AUN1 45608 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 168 / Thursday, August 29, 2019 / Notices of the Act 16 and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b–417 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CboeEDGX–2019–052 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeEDGX–2019–052. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 16 15 17 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Aug 28, 2019 Jkt 247001 will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– CboeEDGX–2019–052 and should be submitted on or before September 19, 2019. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.18 Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2019–18634 Filed 8–28–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change consists of amendments to the FICC Government Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) Rulebook (the ‘‘Rules’’) 4 to: (i) Establish a new deadline and associated late fees for satisfaction of net cash obligations in GCF Repo Transaction 5 and CCIT Transaction 6 activity (hereinafter ‘‘GCF Repo/CCIT activity’’) 7 and remove the current 6 p.m. Collateral Allocation Obligation 8 deadline; (ii) establish a process to provide liquidity to FICC in situations where a Netting Member or CCIT Member 9 with a net cash obligation in GCF Repo/CCIT activity, that is otherwise in good standing, is either (1) delayed in satisfying or (2) unable to satisfy its cash obligation (in whole or in part); and (iii) make a clarification, certain technical changes and corrections, all as further described below. [Release No. 34–86745; File No. SR–FICC– 2019–004] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the GSD Rulebook To Establish a Process To Address Liquidity Needs in Certain Situations in the GCF Repo and CCIT Services and Make Other Changes August 23, 2019. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on August 9, 2019, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the clearing agency.3 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 18 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 On August 9, 2019, FICC filed this proposed rule change as an advance notice (SR–FICC–2019– 801) with the Commission pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act entitled the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010, 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1), and Rule 19b– 4(n)(1)(i) under the Act, 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i). A copy of the advance notice is available at https:// www.dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4 Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined in the Rules, available at https://www.dtcc.com/ legal/rules-and-procedures. 5 ‘‘GCF Repo Transaction’’ means a Repo Transaction involving Generic CUSIP Numbers the data on which are submitted to FICC on a LockedIn-Trade basis pursuant to the provisions of Rule 6C, for netting and settlement by FICC pursuant to the provisions of Rule 20. Rule 1, supra note 4. 6 ‘‘CCIT Transaction’’ means a transaction that is processed by FICC in the CCIT Service. Because the CCIT Service leverages the infrastructure and processes of the GCF Repo Service, a CCIT Transaction must be: (i) In a Generic CUSIP Number approved for the GCF Repo Service and (ii) between a CCIT Member and a Netting Member who participates in the GCF Repo Service where the CCIT Member is the cash lender in the transaction. Rule 1, supra note 4. 7 The GCF Repo Service is primarily governed by Rule 20 and enables Netting Members to trade general collateral finance repurchase agreement transactions based on rate, term, and underlying product throughout the day with brokers on a blind basis. The CCIT Service is governed by Rule 3B and enables tri-party repurchase agreement transactions in GCF Repo Securities between Netting Members that participate in the GCF Repo Service and institutional cash lenders (other than investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended). Rule 20 and Rule 3B, supra note 4. 8 ‘‘Collateral Allocation Obligation’’ means the obligation of a Netting Member to allocate securities or cash for the benefit of FICC to secure such Member’s GCF Net Funds Borrower Position. Rule 1, supra note 4. 9 ‘‘CCITTM’’ means Centrally Cleared Institutional Triparty. The terms ‘‘Centrally Cleared Institutional Triparty Member’’ and ‘‘CCIT Member’’ mean a legal entity other than a Registered Investment Company approved to participate in the FICC’s CCIT Service as a cash lender. Rule 1, supra note 4. Eligibility to become a CCIT Member is described in Section 2 of Rule 3B. Rule 3B, Section 2, supra note 4. E:\FR\FM\29AUN1.SGM 29AUN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 168 (Thursday, August 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45606-45608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18634]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86743; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2019-052]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
Relating To Amend the Fee Schedule Applicable to Members and Non-
Members of the Exchange Pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c)

August 23, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on August 16, 2019, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') is filing 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
rule change to amend the fee schedule applicable to Members and non-
Members \3\ of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rules 15.1(a) and (c). 
Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal are effective 
upon filing. The text of the proposed rule change is attached [sic] as 
Exhibit 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Member is defined as ``any registered broker or dealer 
that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See Exchange 
Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule applicable to its 
options trading platform (``EDGX Options'') to adopt a fee for the 
equity leg of a stock-option order, which orders would yield fee code 
``EQ'', effective August 16, 2019.
    The Exchange first notes that it operates in a highly competitive 
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive or incentives to be insufficient. More specifically, the 
Exchange is only one of 16 options venues to which market participants 
may direct their order flow. Based on publicly available information, 
no single options exchange has more than 20% of the market share.\4\ 
Thus, in such a low-concentrated and highly competitive market, no 
single options exchange possesses significant pricing power in the 
execution of option order flow. The Exchange believes that the ever-
shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month 
demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or 
discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in 
response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the 
Exchange's transaction fees, and market participants can readily trade 
on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues 
to be more favorable. In response to competitive pricing, the Exchange, 
like other options exchanges, offers rebates and assesses fees for 
certain order types executed on or routed through the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Options Market Volume Summary 
(August 15, 2019), available at https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/market_statistics/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to rule filing SR-2019-CboeEDGX-039,\5\ the Exchange will 
implement stock-option order functionality on August 16, 2019. Stock-
option orders are complex instruments that constitute the purchase or 
sale of a stated number of units of an underlying stock or a security 
convertible into the underlying stock coupled with the purchase or sale 
of an option contract(s) on the opposite side of the market and execute 
in the same manner as complex orders. Through this new functionality, 
the stock portions of stock-option strategy orders will be 
electronically communicated by the Exchange to a designated broker-
dealer, who will then manage the execution of such stock portions. In 
connection with the new functionality, the Exchange proposes to adopt a 
stock handling fee of $0.0010 per share for the processing and routing 
by the Exchange of the stock portion of stock-option strategy orders 
executed through those mechanisms. The purpose of the proposed stock 
handling fee is to cover the fees charges by the outside venue that 
prints the trade, as well as assist in covering the Exchange's costs in 
matching these stock-option orders against other stock option orders on 
the complex book. Additionally, the Exchange will also largely pass 
through to Members the fees assessed to the Exchange by the designated 
broker that will be managing the execution of these stock portions of 
stock-option strategy orders. The Exchange notes that other exchanges 
have likewise implemented fees for stock portions of stock-option 
strategy order in response to their respective implementations of 
stock-option strategy order functionality.\6\ Moreover, the proposed 
fee is identical to fees assessed by other options exchanges, including 
that of its affiliated exchange, Cboe Options, for stock legs executed 
as a part of stock-option strategy orders.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86353 (July 11, 
2019), 84 FR 34230 (July 17, 2019) (Notice of Filing and Immediate 
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Add Stock-Option Order 
Functionality and Complex Qualified Contingent Cross (``QCC'') Order 
With Stock Functionality, and To Make Other Changes to its Rules) 
(SR-CboeEDGX-2019-039).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85909 (May 21, 
2019), 84 FR 24587 (May 28, 2019) (SR-EMERALD-2019-21); Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 83788 (August 7, 2018), 83 FR 40110 (August 
13, 2018) (SR-MIAX-2018-18); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
67383 (July 10, 2012), 77 FR 41841 (July 16, 2012) (SR-CBOE-2012-
063).
    \7\ See NASDAQ ISE Options Pricing Schedule, Section 4.12; 
NASDAQ MRX Options Pricing Schedule, Section 4(1); MIAX Emerald Fee 
Schedule, Section 1(a)(vi); MIAX Options Fee Schedule, Section 
1(a)(x); and Cboe Options Fees Schedule, Stock Portion of Stock-
Option Strategy Orders (each exchange charges the same fee of 
$0.0010 per share and capped at $50 per order). The Exchange notes 
that at this time it does not have the functionality available to 
impose a cap per order. The Exchange intends to have this 
functionality in place by Quarter 1 of 2020. The Exchange also does 
not believe that the absence of a cap prior to this timeframe will 
impact market participants as the stock-option strategy 
functionality will be new, thus large trades and large volume 
executed through such orders will take some time to gain traction on 
the Exchange, and, the Exchange notes that a majority of large 
complex orders executed on the Exchange are currently executed 
through its complex order auctions and QCC (including QCC with 
stock). The fee codes appended to these order types do not impose a 
cap.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 45607]]

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6 of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the requirements 
of Section 6(b)(4),\9\ in particular, as it is designed to provide for 
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between 
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange also believes that 
the proposed rule change is consistent with the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5) requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to 
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just 
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, 
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions 
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a 
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to 
protect investors and the public interest, and, particularly, is not 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposed change to assess a charge 
for stock portions of stock-option strategy orders processed and routed 
through the Exchange transactions is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of 
the Act in that the proposal is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory. The Exchange believes the proposed stock handling fee 
for stock-option orders is reasonable and equitable as the proposed fee 
will cover the costs of developing and maintaining the systems that 
allow for the matching and processing of the stock legs of stock-option 
orders executed in the complex order book, as well as all fees charged 
by the outside venue that prints the trade. The Exchange also believes 
it is reasonable and equitable to largely pass through to the Member 
any fees assessed by the routing broker-dealer utilized by the Exchange 
with respect to the execution of the stock leg of any such order. The 
Exchange notes that other exchanges assess the same fee for stock 
components of stock option strategies for the purposes of covering 
similar costs.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee for the stock legs 
of a stock-option strategy order is equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because it will be uniformly applied to all Members that 
execute stock-option orders in the complex order book on the Exchange. 
As noted, the proposed fee is identical to fees assessed by other 
options exchanges for stock legs executed as a part of stock-option 
strategy orders.\11\ As such, stock-option strategy orders are 
available on other options exchanges and participants can readily 
direct order flow to another exchange if they deem other exchanges' 
fees to be more favorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not 
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does not believe that 
the proposed change will impose any burden on intramarket competitions 
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of 
the Act because the proposed change will apply uniformly to the stock 
portions of all market participants' stock-option strategy orders.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously 
discussed, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. 
Members have numerous alternative venues that they may participate on 
and direct their order flow, including 15 other options exchanges. 
Based on publicly available information, no single options exchange has 
more than 20% of the market share.\12\ Therefore, no exchange possesses 
significant pricing power in the execution of option order flow. In 
such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to 
remain competitive with other exchanges and to attract order flow to 
the Exchange. The proposed fee is substantially similar to fees charged 
for stock components of stock-option strategy orders by the Exchange's 
affiliate, Cboe Options, and other competing exchanges,\13\ therefore, 
the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change appropriately 
reflects this competitive environment. Indeed, participants can readily 
choose to send their orders to other exchanges, and, additionally off-
exchange venues, if they deem fee levels at those other venues to be 
more favorable. Moreover, the Commission has repeatedly expressed its 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, 
in Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market 
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized 
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably 
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that 
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\ The fact 
that this market is competitive has also long been recognized by the 
courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. 
Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for 
order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. 
national market system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the 
broker-dealers that act as their order-routing agents, have a wide 
range of choices of where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no 
exchange can afford to take its market share percentages for granted' 
because `no exchange possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in 
the execution of order flow from broker dealers'. . ..''.\15\ 
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change 
imposes any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 4.
    \13\ See supra note 6.
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
    \15\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010) 
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2, 
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)

[[Page 45608]]

of the Act \16\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4\17\ thereunder. At any 
time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the 
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it 
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate 
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such 
action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether 
the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-052 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2019-052. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. 
Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying 
at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be 
posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that 
we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment 
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
CboeEDGX-2019-052 and should be submitted on or before September 19, 
2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-18634 Filed 8-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.