Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Expand OTC Equity Trading Volume Data Published on FINRA's Website, 44341-44343 [2019-18167]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2019 / Notices
bears on continued their eligibility for
access authorization, access to classified
information, or a sensitive position).
9. The estimated number of hours
needed annually to comply with the
information collection requirement or
request: 188.6.
10. Abstract: NRC collects
information on individuals in order to
determine their eligibility for an NRC
access authorization for access to
classified information. NRC-regulated
facilities and other organization are
required to provide information to the
NRC when requested on the cleared
individual and maintain records to
ensure that only individuals with the
adequate level of protection is provided
access to NRC classified information
and material.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day
of August, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David C. Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–18227 Filed 8–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Sunshine Act Meeting
Wednesday, September
11, 2019, 2 p.m. (OPEN Portion); 2:15
p.m. (CLOSED Portion).
PLACE: Offices of the Corporation,
Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New
York Avenue NW, Washington, DC.
STATUS: Meeting OPEN to the Public
from 2 p.m. to 2:15 p.m. Closed portion
will commence at 2:15 p.m. (approx.)
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. President’s Report
2. Tributes
3. Minutes of the Open Session of the
June 12, 2019, Board of Directors
Meeting
FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
(Closed to the Public 2:15 p.m.):
1. Finance Project—India
2. Insurance Project—Barbados
3. Finance Project—Senegal
4. Finance Project—Argentina
5. Finance Project—Argentina
6. Finance Project—Argentina
7. Finance Project—Argentina
8. Finance Project—Argentina
9. Minutes of the Closed Session of the
June 12, 2019, Board of Directors
Meeting
10. Reports
11. Pending Projects
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
TIME AND DATE:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Information on the meeting may be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Aug 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
obtained from Catherine F. I. Andrade at
(202) 336–8768, or via email at
Catherine.Andrade@opic.gov.
Dated: August 20, 2019.
Catherine Andrade,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private
Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2019–18265 Filed 8–21–19; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86706; File No. SR–FINRA–
2019–019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change To Expand
OTC Equity Trading Volume Data
Published on FINRA’s Website
August 19, 2019.
I. Introduction
On July 1, 2019, the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to amend FINRA
Rules 6110 and 6610 to expand the
summary firm data relating to over-thecounter (‘‘OTC’’) equity trading that
FINRA publishes on its website. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on July
11, 2019.3 The Commission received
two comment letters in support of the
proposed rule change.4 This order
approves the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposal
Currently, FINRA publishes certain
volume information for OTC
transactions in NMS stocks 5 and OTC
Equity Securities,6 that are executed
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86315
(July 5, 2019), 84 FR 33098 (July 11, 2019)
(‘‘Notice’’).
4 See letters to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission from: Ray Ross, Chief Technology
Officer, Clearpool Group (‘‘Clearpool’’), dated
August 1, 2019 (‘‘Clearpool Letter’’); Stephen John
Berger, Managing Director, Global Head of
Government & Regulatory Policy, Citadel Securities
(‘‘Citadel’’), dated August 1, 2019 (‘‘Citadel Letter’’).
5 ‘‘NMS stock’’ is defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of the
Commission’s Regulation NMS. See 17 CFR
242.600(b)(47).
6 ‘‘OTC Equity Security’’ means any equity
security that is not an NMS stock, other than a
Restricted Equity Security. See FINRA Rule 6420(f).
A ‘‘Restricted Equity Security’’ means any equity
security that meets the definition of ‘‘restricted
security’’ as contained in Securities Act Rule
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44341
outside of an alternative trading system
(‘‘ATS’’).7 All published data is derived
directly from OTC transactions reported
to a FINRA equity trade reporting
facility. FINRA does not charge a fee for
this data.8
Currently, FINRA publishes weekly
non-ATS OTC volume information
(number of trades and shares) by firm
and by security on a two-week or fourweek delayed basis. Weekly securityspecific information for transactions in
NMS stocks in Tier 1 of the NMS Plan
to Address Extraordinary Market
Volatility (‘‘Tier 1 NMS stocks’’) is
published on a two-week delayed basis,
while information on the remaining
NMS stocks (‘‘Tier 2 NMS stocks’’) and
OTC Equity Securities is published on
a four-week delayed basis. FINRA also
publishes aggregate weekly non-ATS
volume totals by firm and category of
security (Tier 1 NMS stocks, Tier 2 NMS
stocks, and OTC Equity Securities) on
the same timeframes, as well as
aggregate non-ATS volume totals by
firm for all NMS stocks and OTC Equity
Securities, for each calendar month on
a one-month delayed basis.9 All data is
published by firm on an attributed
basis 10 except that, for firms executing
fewer than 200 non-ATS transactions
per day on average during the reporting
period,11 FINRA combines and
publishes the volume for these firms on
an aggregate non-attributed basis
identified in the published data as ‘‘De
Minimis Firms.’’ 12
FINRA has proposed to expand, in
two ways, the summary firm data
relating to non-ATS OTC equity trading
that FINRA publishes on its website.
First, FINRA would publish new
144(a)(3). See FINRA Rule 6420(k); 17 CFR
230.144(a)(3).
7 FINRA Rules 6110(b) and 6610(b) govern the
publication of information for OTC transactions
executed outside of an ATS (‘‘non-ATS’’ volume
data or information). FINRA Rules 6110(c) and
6610(c) separately govern the publication of trading
information for OTC transactions executed on
ATSs.
8 OTC transaction volume data published
pursuant to FINRA Rules 6110 and 6610 is available
at https://otctransparency.finra.org/
otctransparency/.
9 Monthly aggregated data are categorized by
NMS stocks and OTC Equity Securities, i.e., there
is no differentiation between Tier 1 NMS stocks and
Tier 2 NMS stocks.
10 Non-ATS data is published at the firm level,
aggregating each market participant identifier
(‘‘MPID’’) used by a particular firm (but excluding
any MPIDs used by a firm to report trades executed
on its ATS).
11 For a firm with multiple non-ATS MPIDs, the
total volume across all its MPIDs is combined for
purposes of determining whether the de minimis
threshold has been met.
12 There is no parallel de minimis exception for
ATS transactions under FINRA Rules 6110(c) and
6610(c). Therefore, all ATS volume data is currently
published on an attributed basis.
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
44342
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2019 / Notices
monthly aggregate block-size trading
data for non-ATS OTC trades in NMS
stocks, on the same terms as FINRA
currently publishes aggregate block-size
trading data for trades in NMS stocks
occurring on ATSs. Second, FINRA
would eliminate the current de minimis
exception for publication of aggregate
non-ATS trading volume across all NMS
stocks and OTC Equity Securities, and
publish each firm’s aggregate non-ATS
volume on an attributed basis. Each
component of the proposed rule change
is addressed below.
Non-ATS Block-Size Trading Data
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to its Rule 6110(c)(2), FINRA
currently publishes monthly
information on block-size trades in all
NMS stocks occurring on ATSs. Data
regarding block-size trades on ATSs is
aggregated across all NMS stocks (i.e.,
there is no security-by-security block
data), are for a time period of one month
of trading, and are published no earlier
than one month following the end of the
month for which trading was
aggregated.
FINRA currently publishes
information on block-size ATS trades in
NMS stocks using share-based
thresholds, dollar-based thresholds, and
thresholds that include both shares and
dollar amount as follows:
• 10,000 or more shares;
• $200,000 or more in dollar value;
• 10,000 or more shares and $200,000
or more in dollar value;
• 2,000 to 9,999 shares;
• $100,000 to $199,999 in dollar
value; and
• 2,000 to 9,999 shares and $100,000
to $199,999 in dollar value.13
For each of these categories, FINRA
publishes monthly trade count and
volume information for each ATS, on an
attributed basis, aggregated across all
NMS stocks with no differentiation
between Tier 1 NMS stocks and Tier 2
NMS stocks. FINRA also calculates and
displays the average trade size and each
ATS’s rank as well as ‘‘ATS Block
Market Share’’ (i.e., the proportion of
each ATS’s block-size trading volume in
relation to total block-size trading by all
ATSs) and ‘‘ATS Block Business Share’’
(i.e., the proportion of a particular
ATS’s overall trading volume that was
done as block-size trades) and rankings
of those metrics for each of the above
categories.14
13 See FINRA Regulatory Notice 16–14 (April
2016) (Alternative Trading Systems).
14 ATS block-size data can be viewed at https://
otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/
AtsBlocks. The data may also be directly
downloaded through the OTC Transparency Data
web page, https://otctransparency.finra.org/
otctransparency/AtsBlocksDownload.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Aug 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
FINRA has proposed to expand the
block-size trading data that it publishes
on its website to include monthly
aggregate block-size trading data for all
OTC trades in NMS stocks, regardless of
whether they are ATS or non-ATS
trades.15 The new block-size data for
non-ATS OTC trades would be
published on the same terms as blocksize data is currently published for ATS
trades, and FINRA would not charge a
fee for the new data. Specifically,
proposed paragraph (b)(3) of FINRA
Rule 6110 provides that non-ATS blocksize data would be published in
aggregate across all NMS stocks (i.e.,
there would be no security-by-security
block data), would be for a time period
of one month of trading, and would be
published no earlier than one month
following the end of the month for
which trading was aggregated. All
published data would be derived
directly from OTC trades reported to a
FINRA trade reporting facility and
would not create any new requirements
for FINRA members.
Pursuant to proposed FINRA Rule
6110(b)(3), FINRA would publish the
new non-ATS block-size data with
elements to be determined from time to
time by FINRA in its discretion, as
stated in a Regulatory Notice or other
equivalent publication. As with current
block-size data regarding ATS OTC
trades, non-ATS block-size data will be
published using the same share-based,
dollar-based, and combination shareand dollar-based thresholds used for
ATS block-size data, as described above.
For each category, FINRA would
publish monthly trade count and
volume information for each firm, on an
attributed basis, aggregated across all
NMS stocks with no differentiation
between Tier 1 NMS stocks and Tier 2
NMS stocks.16 Each firm that engages in
block-size non-ATS trading of NMS
stocks would be separately identified,
15 In developing its proposal to publish non-ATS
block-size data, FINRA discussed the initiative with
a number of its industry advisory committees,
informally consulted a number of firms, and
solicited written comment. FINRA stated that firms
were generally supportive of publishing non-ATS
block-size data, which would provide enhanced
transparency into the OTC market as a complement
to the currently published ATS block-size data. See
Notice, 84 FR at 33099. FINRA also stated that
several firms raised potential information leakage
concerns involved with publishing new block-size
data, but indicated that such concerns would be
mitigated by publishing data on an aggregated basis,
rather than security-by-security, and by delaying
publication. See id.
16 FINRA has not proposed at this time to publish
non-ATS block-size data for trading in OTC Equity
Securities. In the Notice, FINRA stated that it will
continue to assess whether block-size trading data
should be expanded to include trades in OTC
Equity Securities or a subset thereof. See Notice, 84
FR at 33099, n. 15.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
i.e., FINRA is not proposing any de
minimis exception for non-ATS blocksize data. FINRA also would calculate
and display the average trade size and
each firm’s rank as well as ‘‘Firm Block
Market Share’’ (i.e., the proportion of
each firm’s block-size trading volume in
relation to total block-size trading by all
firms) and ‘‘Firm Block Business Share’’
(i.e., the proportion of a particular firm’s
overall trading volume that was done as
block-size trades) and rankings of those
metrics for each of the above
categories.17
Elimination of the De Minimis
Exception
FINRA has proposed to eliminate the
current de minimis exception for
publication of aggregate non-ATS OTC
trading volume, and instead publish on
an attributed basis each firm’s aggregate
non-ATS OTC volume (number of trades
and shares) on a weekly or monthly
basis, as applicable.18
FINRA also proposed several other
technical, non-substantive, and
conforming changes to the current rule
text.19
FINRA has stated that it will
announce the effective date of the
proposed rule change in a Regulatory
Notice following a Commission
approval, and the effective date of the
proposed rule change will be no earlier
than October 1, 2019, and no later than
March 31, 2020.20 FINRA anticipates
that it will begin publication of data in
accordance with the proposed rule
change in the fourth quarter of 2019.21
17 In the Notice, FINRA stated that it will
announce any changes to these elements in advance
in a Regulatory Notice or similar publication.
18 However, FINRA has not proposed to eliminate
the de minimis exception for purposes of the
security-specific non-ATS OTC volume data under
FINRA Rules 6110(b)(2)(C) and 6610(b)(2)(C).
Therefore, if a firm averages fewer than 200 nonATS OTC transactions per day in a given security
during the reporting period, FINRA would continue
to aggregate the firm’s volume in that security with
that of similarly situated firms, and there would
continue to be a De Minimis Firms category for
published security-by-security volume data.
19 FINRA proposed to amend Rules 6110(b)(1)(A)
and (B) and 6610(b)(1)(A) to clarify that those
provisions apply to the publication of aggregate
weekly trading information, which will conform to
language in current Rules 6110(c) and 6610(c).
FINRA further proposed to amend Rules
6110(b)(2)(B) and 6610(b)(2)(B) (as re-designated by
the proposed rule change) to clarify that the
remaining de minimis exceptions under those
provisions apply to trading information by security.
Finally, FINRA proposed to amend the final
sentence of Rule 6610(b)(3) to correct the crossreference to the definition of ‘‘ATS Trading
Information.’’
20 See Notice, 84 FR at 33100.
21 See id.
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 164 / Friday, August 23, 2019 / Notices
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
jbell on DSK3GLQ082PROD with NOTICES
After careful consideration, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities association.22 In
particular, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,23
which requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.
The Commission previously found
that the earliest iteration of FINRA’s
publication protocols for ATS OTC
trade data were consistent with the
Act.24 Several commenters on that
initial proposal urged FINRA to broaden
its publication protocols to include nonATS OTC trading centers, not only
ATSs. FINRA responded that ‘‘it
considered various alternatives and
concluded that ATS trade information
was an appropriate first step toward
increased transparency in the offexchange OTC market. FINRA stated
further that it would consider additional
steps, including those suggested by the
commenters, in the future.’’ 25
Subsequently, in 2015, FINRA
proposed to expand transparency of
OTC equity trading data by publishing
certain information regarding non-ATS
OTC trading.26 At that time, however,
FINRA did not believe that publishing
volume information for each firm that
executed only a small number of trades
or shares in any given period would
provide meaningful information to the
marketplace.27 Therefore, FINRA
proposed to combine volume from all
members that did not meet a specified
minimum threshold and publish such
information for those members on an
22 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
23 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
24 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71341
(January 17, 2014), 79 FR 4213, 4217 (January 24,
2014) (Order Approving SR–FINRA–2013–042).
FINRA subsequently expanded the scope of the
ATS OTC trade data that it publishes on its website.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76931
(January 19, 2016), 81 FR 4076 (January 25, 2016)
(SR–FINRA–2016–002) (immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change relating to ATS volume and
trading information).
25 Order Approving SR–FINRA–2013–042, 79 FR
at 4215 (citation omitted).
26 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75356
(July 2, 2015), 80 FR 39463 (July 9, 2015) (Notice
of SR–FINRA–2015–020).
27 See id., 80 FR at 39464.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Aug 22, 2019
Jkt 247001
aggregated basis.28 The Commission
approved the proposed rule change
because publishing this data, even
though not to the same degree of
granularity as ATS OTC trade data,
would facilitate better understanding of
the OTC equity market.29
FINRA is now proposing to apply to
non-ATS OTC trade data more of the
publication protocols that it currently
applies to ATS OTC trade data.
Specifically, FINRA will publish new
monthly aggregate block-size trading
data for non-ATS OTC trades in NMS
stocks, on the same terms as FINRA
currently publishes aggregate block-size
trading data for ATS trades in NMS
stocks. Second, FINRA will eliminate
the de minimis exception for
publication of aggregate non-ATS
trading volume across all NMS stocks
and OTC Equity Securities, and publish
each firm’s aggregate non-ATS volume
on an attributed basis. The Commission
believes that the proposal will enhance
transparency in the OTC equity market
by making additional trading volume
data available on FINRA’s website in a
manner reasonably designed to avoid
adverse market impact, and without
imposing any new requirements, on
FINRA members. Therefore, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
a national securities association. The
Commission notes that it received no
comments objecting to the proposal.30
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,31 that the
proposed rule change (SR–FINRA–
2019–019) is approved.
28 See
id.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76078
(October 5, 2015), 80 FR 61246, 61247–49 (October
9, 2015) (Order Approving SR–FINRA–2015–020).
30 Two commenters generally supported the
proposal while suggesting ways to further expand
publication of non-ATS OTC trade data. Clearpool
suggested that FINRA eliminate the de minimis
exception for purposes of the security-specific nonATS volume data as well as separately identifying
a firm’s volume of trading on a single-dealer
platform. See Clearpool Letter at 2. Citadel
suggested that FINRA separate the monthly
aggregate block-size trading data into ETF and nonETF categories to maximize the granularity and
utility of the data. See Citadel Letter at 1. In
response to these comments, FINRA stated that it
‘‘continue[s] to consider further enhancements to
the OTC volume information published on our
website and we would consider these suggestions
as part of potential future changes, but we would
not plan to include them in this filing.’’ Email to
David Michehl, Special Counsel, Commission, from
Robert McNamee, Assistant General Counsel,
FINRA (dated August 8, 2019).
31 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
29 See
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44343
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.32
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–18167 Filed 8–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–86705; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2019–061]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Nasdaq Official Closing
Price for Nasdaq-Listed ExchangeTraded Products
August 19, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on August 8,
2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes a rule change
regarding how the Nasdaq Official
Closing Price (‘‘NOCP’’) will be
determined for a Nasdaq-listed security
that is an exchange-traded product (as
defined herein).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
32 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\23AUN1.SGM
23AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44341-44343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18167]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-86706; File No. SR-FINRA-2019-019]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Expand OTC
Equity Trading Volume Data Published on FINRA's Website
August 19, 2019.
I. Introduction
On July 1, 2019, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend FINRA Rules 6110 and 6610 to expand the
summary firm data relating to over-the-counter (``OTC'') equity trading
that FINRA publishes on its website. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on July 11, 2019.\3\ The
Commission received two comment letters in support of the proposed rule
change.\4\ This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86315 (July 5,
2019), 84 FR 33098 (July 11, 2019) (``Notice'').
\4\ See letters to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary, Commission
from: Ray Ross, Chief Technology Officer, Clearpool Group
(``Clearpool''), dated August 1, 2019 (``Clearpool Letter'');
Stephen John Berger, Managing Director, Global Head of Government &
Regulatory Policy, Citadel Securities (``Citadel''), dated August 1,
2019 (``Citadel Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposal
Currently, FINRA publishes certain volume information for OTC
transactions in NMS stocks \5\ and OTC Equity Securities,\6\ that are
executed outside of an alternative trading system (``ATS'').\7\ All
published data is derived directly from OTC transactions reported to a
FINRA equity trade reporting facility. FINRA does not charge a fee for
this data.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ ``NMS stock'' is defined in Rule 600(b)(47) of the
Commission's Regulation NMS. See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
\6\ ``OTC Equity Security'' means any equity security that is
not an NMS stock, other than a Restricted Equity Security. See FINRA
Rule 6420(f). A ``Restricted Equity Security'' means any equity
security that meets the definition of ``restricted security'' as
contained in Securities Act Rule 144(a)(3). See FINRA Rule 6420(k);
17 CFR 230.144(a)(3).
\7\ FINRA Rules 6110(b) and 6610(b) govern the publication of
information for OTC transactions executed outside of an ATS (``non-
ATS'' volume data or information). FINRA Rules 6110(c) and 6610(c)
separately govern the publication of trading information for OTC
transactions executed on ATSs.
\8\ OTC transaction volume data published pursuant to FINRA
Rules 6110 and 6610 is available at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, FINRA publishes weekly non-ATS OTC volume information
(number of trades and shares) by firm and by security on a two-week or
four-week delayed basis. Weekly security-specific information for
transactions in NMS stocks in Tier 1 of the NMS Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility (``Tier 1 NMS stocks'') is published on
a two-week delayed basis, while information on the remaining NMS stocks
(``Tier 2 NMS stocks'') and OTC Equity Securities is published on a
four-week delayed basis. FINRA also publishes aggregate weekly non-ATS
volume totals by firm and category of security (Tier 1 NMS stocks, Tier
2 NMS stocks, and OTC Equity Securities) on the same timeframes, as
well as aggregate non-ATS volume totals by firm for all NMS stocks and
OTC Equity Securities, for each calendar month on a one-month delayed
basis.\9\ All data is published by firm on an attributed basis \10\
except that, for firms executing fewer than 200 non-ATS transactions
per day on average during the reporting period,\11\ FINRA combines and
publishes the volume for these firms on an aggregate non-attributed
basis identified in the published data as ``De Minimis Firms.'' \12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Monthly aggregated data are categorized by NMS stocks and
OTC Equity Securities, i.e., there is no differentiation between
Tier 1 NMS stocks and Tier 2 NMS stocks.
\10\ Non-ATS data is published at the firm level, aggregating
each market participant identifier (``MPID'') used by a particular
firm (but excluding any MPIDs used by a firm to report trades
executed on its ATS).
\11\ For a firm with multiple non-ATS MPIDs, the total volume
across all its MPIDs is combined for purposes of determining whether
the de minimis threshold has been met.
\12\ There is no parallel de minimis exception for ATS
transactions under FINRA Rules 6110(c) and 6610(c). Therefore, all
ATS volume data is currently published on an attributed basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA has proposed to expand, in two ways, the summary firm data
relating to non-ATS OTC equity trading that FINRA publishes on its
website. First, FINRA would publish new
[[Page 44342]]
monthly aggregate block-size trading data for non-ATS OTC trades in NMS
stocks, on the same terms as FINRA currently publishes aggregate block-
size trading data for trades in NMS stocks occurring on ATSs. Second,
FINRA would eliminate the current de minimis exception for publication
of aggregate non-ATS trading volume across all NMS stocks and OTC
Equity Securities, and publish each firm's aggregate non-ATS volume on
an attributed basis. Each component of the proposed rule change is
addressed below.
Non-ATS Block-Size Trading Data
Pursuant to its Rule 6110(c)(2), FINRA currently publishes monthly
information on block-size trades in all NMS stocks occurring on ATSs.
Data regarding block-size trades on ATSs is aggregated across all NMS
stocks (i.e., there is no security-by-security block data), are for a
time period of one month of trading, and are published no earlier than
one month following the end of the month for which trading was
aggregated.
FINRA currently publishes information on block-size ATS trades in
NMS stocks using share-based thresholds, dollar-based thresholds, and
thresholds that include both shares and dollar amount as follows:
10,000 or more shares;
$200,000 or more in dollar value;
10,000 or more shares and $200,000 or more in dollar
value;
2,000 to 9,999 shares;
$100,000 to $199,999 in dollar value; and
2,000 to 9,999 shares and $100,000 to $199,999 in dollar
value.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See FINRA Regulatory Notice 16-14 (April 2016) (Alternative
Trading Systems).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each of these categories, FINRA publishes monthly trade count
and volume information for each ATS, on an attributed basis, aggregated
across all NMS stocks with no differentiation between Tier 1 NMS stocks
and Tier 2 NMS stocks. FINRA also calculates and displays the average
trade size and each ATS's rank as well as ``ATS Block Market Share''
(i.e., the proportion of each ATS's block-size trading volume in
relation to total block-size trading by all ATSs) and ``ATS Block
Business Share'' (i.e., the proportion of a particular ATS's overall
trading volume that was done as block-size trades) and rankings of
those metrics for each of the above categories.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ATS block-size data can be viewed at https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsBlocks. The data may
also be directly downloaded through the OTC Transparency Data web
page, https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsBlocksDownload.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA has proposed to expand the block-size trading data that it
publishes on its website to include monthly aggregate block-size
trading data for all OTC trades in NMS stocks, regardless of whether
they are ATS or non-ATS trades.\15\ The new block-size data for non-ATS
OTC trades would be published on the same terms as block-size data is
currently published for ATS trades, and FINRA would not charge a fee
for the new data. Specifically, proposed paragraph (b)(3) of FINRA Rule
6110 provides that non-ATS block-size data would be published in
aggregate across all NMS stocks (i.e., there would be no security-by-
security block data), would be for a time period of one month of
trading, and would be published no earlier than one month following the
end of the month for which trading was aggregated. All published data
would be derived directly from OTC trades reported to a FINRA trade
reporting facility and would not create any new requirements for FINRA
members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ In developing its proposal to publish non-ATS block-size
data, FINRA discussed the initiative with a number of its industry
advisory committees, informally consulted a number of firms, and
solicited written comment. FINRA stated that firms were generally
supportive of publishing non-ATS block-size data, which would
provide enhanced transparency into the OTC market as a complement to
the currently published ATS block-size data. See Notice, 84 FR at
33099. FINRA also stated that several firms raised potential
information leakage concerns involved with publishing new block-size
data, but indicated that such concerns would be mitigated by
publishing data on an aggregated basis, rather than security-by-
security, and by delaying publication. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to proposed FINRA Rule 6110(b)(3), FINRA would publish the
new non-ATS block-size data with elements to be determined from time to
time by FINRA in its discretion, as stated in a Regulatory Notice or
other equivalent publication. As with current block-size data regarding
ATS OTC trades, non-ATS block-size data will be published using the
same share-based, dollar-based, and combination share- and dollar-based
thresholds used for ATS block-size data, as described above. For each
category, FINRA would publish monthly trade count and volume
information for each firm, on an attributed basis, aggregated across
all NMS stocks with no differentiation between Tier 1 NMS stocks and
Tier 2 NMS stocks.\16\ Each firm that engages in block-size non-ATS
trading of NMS stocks would be separately identified, i.e., FINRA is
not proposing any de minimis exception for non-ATS block-size data.
FINRA also would calculate and display the average trade size and each
firm's rank as well as ``Firm Block Market Share'' (i.e., the
proportion of each firm's block-size trading volume in relation to
total block-size trading by all firms) and ``Firm Block Business
Share'' (i.e., the proportion of a particular firm's overall trading
volume that was done as block-size trades) and rankings of those
metrics for each of the above categories.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ FINRA has not proposed at this time to publish non-ATS
block-size data for trading in OTC Equity Securities. In the Notice,
FINRA stated that it will continue to assess whether block-size
trading data should be expanded to include trades in OTC Equity
Securities or a subset thereof. See Notice, 84 FR at 33099, n. 15.
\17\ In the Notice, FINRA stated that it will announce any
changes to these elements in advance in a Regulatory Notice or
similar publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elimination of the De Minimis Exception
FINRA has proposed to eliminate the current de minimis exception
for publication of aggregate non-ATS OTC trading volume, and instead
publish on an attributed basis each firm's aggregate non-ATS OTC volume
(number of trades and shares) on a weekly or monthly basis, as
applicable.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ However, FINRA has not proposed to eliminate the de minimis
exception for purposes of the security-specific non-ATS OTC volume
data under FINRA Rules 6110(b)(2)(C) and 6610(b)(2)(C). Therefore,
if a firm averages fewer than 200 non-ATS OTC transactions per day
in a given security during the reporting period, FINRA would
continue to aggregate the firm's volume in that security with that
of similarly situated firms, and there would continue to be a De
Minimis Firms category for published security-by-security volume
data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA also proposed several other technical, non-substantive, and
conforming changes to the current rule text.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ FINRA proposed to amend Rules 6110(b)(1)(A) and (B) and
6610(b)(1)(A) to clarify that those provisions apply to the
publication of aggregate weekly trading information, which will
conform to language in current Rules 6110(c) and 6610(c). FINRA
further proposed to amend Rules 6110(b)(2)(B) and 6610(b)(2)(B) (as
re-designated by the proposed rule change) to clarify that the
remaining de minimis exceptions under those provisions apply to
trading information by security. Finally, FINRA proposed to amend
the final sentence of Rule 6610(b)(3) to correct the cross-reference
to the definition of ``ATS Trading Information.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA has stated that it will announce the effective date of the
proposed rule change in a Regulatory Notice following a Commission
approval, and the effective date of the proposed rule change will be no
earlier than October 1, 2019, and no later than March 31, 2020.\20\
FINRA anticipates that it will begin publication of data in accordance
with the proposed rule change in the fourth quarter of 2019.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See Notice, 84 FR at 33100.
\21\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 44343]]
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
association.\22\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\23\ which
requires, among other things, that FINRA rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission previously found that the earliest iteration of
FINRA's publication protocols for ATS OTC trade data were consistent
with the Act.\24\ Several commenters on that initial proposal urged
FINRA to broaden its publication protocols to include non-ATS OTC
trading centers, not only ATSs. FINRA responded that ``it considered
various alternatives and concluded that ATS trade information was an
appropriate first step toward increased transparency in the off-
exchange OTC market. FINRA stated further that it would consider
additional steps, including those suggested by the commenters, in the
future.'' \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71341 (January 17,
2014), 79 FR 4213, 4217 (January 24, 2014) (Order Approving SR-
FINRA-2013-042). FINRA subsequently expanded the scope of the ATS
OTC trade data that it publishes on its website. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 76931 (January 19, 2016), 81 FR 4076
(January 25, 2016) (SR-FINRA-2016-002) (immediate effectiveness of
proposed rule change relating to ATS volume and trading
information).
\25\ Order Approving SR-FINRA-2013-042, 79 FR at 4215 (citation
omitted).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequently, in 2015, FINRA proposed to expand transparency of OTC
equity trading data by publishing certain information regarding non-ATS
OTC trading.\26\ At that time, however, FINRA did not believe that
publishing volume information for each firm that executed only a small
number of trades or shares in any given period would provide meaningful
information to the marketplace.\27\ Therefore, FINRA proposed to
combine volume from all members that did not meet a specified minimum
threshold and publish such information for those members on an
aggregated basis.\28\ The Commission approved the proposed rule change
because publishing this data, even though not to the same degree of
granularity as ATS OTC trade data, would facilitate better
understanding of the OTC equity market.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75356 (July 2,
2015), 80 FR 39463 (July 9, 2015) (Notice of SR-FINRA-2015-020).
\27\ See id., 80 FR at 39464.
\28\ See id.
\29\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76078 (October 5,
2015), 80 FR 61246, 61247-49 (October 9, 2015) (Order Approving SR-
FINRA-2015-020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA is now proposing to apply to non-ATS OTC trade data more of
the publication protocols that it currently applies to ATS OTC trade
data. Specifically, FINRA will publish new monthly aggregate block-size
trading data for non-ATS OTC trades in NMS stocks, on the same terms as
FINRA currently publishes aggregate block-size trading data for ATS
trades in NMS stocks. Second, FINRA will eliminate the de minimis
exception for publication of aggregate non-ATS trading volume across
all NMS stocks and OTC Equity Securities, and publish each firm's
aggregate non-ATS volume on an attributed basis. The Commission
believes that the proposal will enhance transparency in the OTC equity
market by making additional trading volume data available on FINRA's
website in a manner reasonably designed to avoid adverse market impact,
and without imposing any new requirements, on FINRA members. Therefore,
the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities association. The Commission notes that it received no
comments objecting to the proposal.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Two commenters generally supported the proposal while
suggesting ways to further expand publication of non-ATS OTC trade
data. Clearpool suggested that FINRA eliminate the de minimis
exception for purposes of the security-specific non-ATS volume data
as well as separately identifying a firm's volume of trading on a
single-dealer platform. See Clearpool Letter at 2. Citadel suggested
that FINRA separate the monthly aggregate block-size trading data
into ETF and non-ETF categories to maximize the granularity and
utility of the data. See Citadel Letter at 1. In response to these
comments, FINRA stated that it ``continue[s] to consider further
enhancements to the OTC volume information published on our website
and we would consider these suggestions as part of potential future
changes, but we would not plan to include them in this filing.''
Email to David Michehl, Special Counsel, Commission, from Robert
McNamee, Assistant General Counsel, FINRA (dated August 8, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\31\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2019-019) is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-18167 Filed 8-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P